Arxeooptik - Archaeo-optics - Wikipedia

Arxeooptik, yoki arxeologik optika, qadimgi odamlar tomonidan nurni urf-odatlari va tajribalaridan o'rganish. Arxeologik optika insoniyatning uzoq o'tmishdagi jismoniy muhit haqidagi tasavvurlarini o'rganadigan va arxeologiyaning bir qismi. arxeoastronomiya bu osmon jismlarini qadimgi kuzatuvlari va tovushning qo'llanilishi bilan shug'ullanadigan arxeologik akustika.

Dunyo bo'ylab bir nechta tergovchilar tomonidan olib borilgan tadqiqotlar qadimgi odamlar qanday duch kelganini va ulardan qanday foydalanganligini aniqladi fotoapparat turli maqsadlar uchun printsip. Qorong'i xonada kichik teshikdan o'tgan yorug'lik hayajonli va vaqtinchalik harakatlanuvchi tasvirlarni yaratishi mumkin, bu esa fikrlarni buzish rejimlarini, vakillik shakllarini va boshqa dunyo sohalariga ishonishni kuchaytirishi va kuchaytirishi mumkin edi.[1]

Optik asos

Engil

Ko'rinadigan yorug'lik, elektromagnit spektrning kichik bir qismi 380-750 nanometrgacha bo'lgan to'lqin uzunliklarini o'z ichiga oladi, ular odamlar spektr ranglari sifatida qabul qiladilar: qizil, to'q sariq, sariq, yashil, ko'k, indigo va binafsha rang. Yorug'lik o'zini aniq belgilangan qoidalar to'plami asosida tutadi: agar u boshqacha singan yoki boshqa ob'ekt tomonidan aks ettirilmasa yoki tortishish kuchi bilan egri bo'lmasa, u to'g'ri chiziqlar bo'ylab harakatlanadi.

Vizyon

An ko'z mohiyatan qoraygan kamera bo'lib, uning oldida yorug'lik kirib borishini ta'minlaydigan kichik teshik bor. O'quvchining teshiklari orqasida joylashgan ob'ektiv juda aniq, ammo qora rangda ko'rinadi, chunki uning orqasidagi ichki bo'shliq qorong'i. Nur nurlari linzadan o'tib, retinada teskari tasvir hosil qiladi.[2] Miya tasvirni qayta o'zgartiradi. Teskari tasvirni proektsiyalashning ushbu optik jarayoni a deb nomlanadi fotoapparat (lotincha, qorong'i xona degan ma'noni anglatadi). Birinchi pinhole / kamera obscura ko'zlari taxminan 540 million yil oldin dengiz mollyuskasida, ya'ni nautilus, Kembriy davrida. Kamera obscura printsipi ibtidoiy va er yuzidagi hayot undan foydalanish uchun rivojlangan.

Kamera xiralashishi

Kamera obscura printsipi faqat ko'zlar, hatto linzalar bilan chegaralanib qolmaydi, balki kichik teshik yoki diafragma va har qanday o'lchamdagi yoki shakldagi har qanday qoraygan bo'shliq bilan ishlaydi. Zamonaviy davrda kamera obscuras poyabzal qutilaridan, jo'xori uni qutilaridan, soda qutilaridan, pechene konteynerlaridan, dengiz qobig'idan, tuxum qobig'idan, muzlatgichlardan, chodirlardan, yuk mashinalaridan, samolyot angarlaridan va hatto qor va axloqsizlikning tozalangan shakllaridan yaratilgan. Kamera obscurasi, shuningdek tomning, devorning yoki deraza oynasining kichik teshigidan hosil bo'lishi mumkin, bu orqali tashqi ko'rinishi qorong'i xona ichidagi devorga chiqadi.[3] Biolog Donald Perri Kosta-Rikaning yomg'ir o'rmoniga ekspeditsiyaga bordi va u erda katta bo'shliq daraxtining bo'shlig'iga chiqdi va tashqi dunyoning teskari qiyofasini magistralning ichki devoriga aks ettiradigan kichik teshikni topdi. .[4] Bunday tajriba vaqt o'tishi bilan mavjud.[5]

Yaratilgan rasm teskari kino kabi ko'rinadi. Kamera obscura yorqin tashqi dunyo va xira ichki makon o'rtasidagi qarama-qarshilikka asoslanadi, shuning uchun katta kontrast aniqroq tasavvurga ega tasvirni hosil qiladi. Ichki makonda mutlaqo qorong'ulik kerak emas, lekin ikkita yoritish darajasi o'rtasida sezilarli farq bo'lishi kerak.

Arxeologik asos

Arxitektura

Arxeologik yozuvlar vaqt o'tishi bilan qurilgan inshootlarni qazish bilan to'ldirilgan, ammo materiallarning tabiiy parchalanishi va saqlanish injiqliklari tufayli, vaqt orqaga qarab orqaga qarab, asarlar saqlanib qolish ehtimoli kamroq. Masalan, Paleolit dan boshpana inshootlari Quyi paleolit (taxminan 2,600,000 - 300,000 BP) va O'rta Paleolit ​​(taxminan 300,000 - 45,000 BP) odatda kamroq to'liq va shu bilan izohlanishga to'g'ri keladi, yuqori paleolitga tegishli bo'lganlar (taxminan 45,000- 10,000,000 BP) ham ko'proq va yaxshiroqdir. saqlanib qolgan. Paleolitik tuzilmalarda, umuman, qolgan uskuna yo'q va ular asarlarning izidan kelib chiqishi kerak.[6]

Aksincha, ba'zilari Neolitik tuzilmalar er usti elementlaridan yuqori bo'lib turadi. Neolit ​​davrida qishloq xo'jaligi rivojlanib, aholi punktlari tashkil etilgan bo'lib, ular oziq-ovqat mahsulotlarining ortiqcha qismini ishlab chiqargan va aholi zichligi oshgan. Katta, kelishilgan ishchi kuchi ulkan toshlarni tortib olish jarayoniga katta, doimiy inshootlarni qurish imkoniyatini berdi. Taxminan 5000 BP ga ko'ra, keng tarqalgan hududda ko'plab odamlar jamoat joylarini o'rab olish uchun katta yog'och va toshlarni yoki megalitlarni barpo etishgan. Tarixiy davrlarga kelib, yozuvning rivojlanishi, tashqi ko'rinishi, materiallari, dizayni, ishlatilishi va tuzilmalar bilan bog'liq voqealar tavsiflari bilan yana bir ma'lumot qatlamini taqdim etdi. Qoldiqlar va yozuvlarning bu kombinatsiyasi arxeooptik tahlilning aniqligini oshiradi.

Arxeologik optika va arxeoastronomiya

Tarixdan oldin quyoshning ufqdagi holatiga yo'naltirilgan tuzilmalar ham kameraning obscura holatlarini yaratganligi haqida ba'zi dalillar mavjud. G'arbiy Evropada bunga misol qilib midwinter sunrise at Newgrange,[7] midwinter quyosh botishi Maeshove,[8] va yozning o'rtalarida quyosh chiqishi Bryn Celli Ddu.[9]

Arxeoastronomik tadqiqotlar an'anaviy ravishda ushbu yodgorlik turlarini rasadxonalar sifatida muhokama qilgan bo'lsa, 1990-yillarda o'tkazilgan dala ishlari Balnuaran Ronni Skott va Tim Fillipsning "Klava" filmi shuni ko'rsatadiki, qishning o'rtalarida quyosh botishi ikkitaning ichida tasvirlarni yaratgan bo'lar edi mozorlar. Ushbu yodgorliklarning qulab tushgan tomlarini vaqtincha rekonstruksiya qilish orqali ular o'zlarining o'tish yo'llari bo'ylab quyoshni ko'rish harakati nafaqat ko'zi ojizligini, balki bir vaqtning o'zida bir kishi uni aniq ko'rishlari mumkinligini ta'kidladilar. Aksincha, yigirma kishidan ziyod tomoshabin ikkala kameraning devorlariga o'rnatilgan qasddan naqshli toshlarga quyosh nurlari tushishini kuzatish uchun orqa tomonga qarab turishi mumkin edi.[10] Ushbu kuzatuvlar Skottni ushbu tuzilmalar kameralar obscuras ekanligi va quyosh diskining optik proektsiyasi osmon orqali quyosh harakatlarini ko'paytirib, ko'p odamlar birdan ko'rishi mumkinligiga ishontirishga ilhomlantirdi.[11]

Arxeologik optika va hislar arxeologiyasi

Arxeologik optika intizomning yanada kengroq bo'lishiga, hislar arxeologiyasiga yordam beradi. Faqat o'tmishdagi qoldiqlarni, masalan, tik turgan toshlar yoki qurilgan devorlarni qayd etish o'rniga, bu kengroq intizom, bu xususiyatlar orasidagi bo'shliqlar, hatto asl tuzilmalarning qismlari yo'qolib ketgan bo'lsa ham, hissiy tajriba maydonlari bo'lishi mumkinligini ta'kidlaydi. Hislar orasida ko'rish muhim ahamiyatga ega, shu jumladan saytlar orasidagi ko'rinishni o'rganish,[12] geologiya va topografiya bilan o'zaro aloqalar,[13] arxeoastronomik hizalama,[14] yoki rang ramziyligi.[15] Shu bilan birga, antropologiya boshqa hissiyotlarni ta'kidlaydigan jamiyatlarni ochib berdi[16] hid va hid kabi fazilatlarni o'z ichiga oladi.[17] Oziq-ovqat va ichimliklar hissiyotining ijtimoiy ahamiyati,[18] va teginish va to'qima[19] ham ko'rib chiqilishi mumkin.

Boshqa tadqiqotlar arxeomusikologiya va arxeoakustikani o'rganib chiqdi.[20] Paleolit ​​davriga oid suyak buyumlari musiqa asboblari sifatida talqin qilingan,[21] yoki "ovoz chiqaruvchi qurilmalar",[22] g'orlar ichidagi ba'zi tabiiy xususiyatlar g'ayrioddiy tovushlarni chiqarishi aniqlandi.[23] G'orlar ayniqsa rezonans xususiyatiga ega bo'lgan joylarda paleolit ​​davridagi g'or san'ati guruhlari haqida takliflar mavjud.[24] 1990-yillarda qurilgan me'morchilikning ovozli xususiyatlari tobora chuqurroq tekshirila boshlanib, kamerali neolit ​​davri ichidagi ovozli rezonanslarni tekshirishda,[25] turli megalitik tuzilmalar doirasidagi kengroq akustik hodisa.[26]

Arxeologik optikani o'z ichiga olgan hislar arxeologiyasi, o'tmishda o'tmishdagi tajribalari tabiatan qisman va sub'ektiv bo'lgan tirik odamlar yashaganligini ta'kidlaydi. Darhaqiqat, ushbu sub'ektivlik qadimgi inshootlarda sodir bo'layotgan voqealar uchun ham mazmunli, ham sirli bo'lishi mumkin edi. Bu hislar vaqt o'tishi bilan odamlar tomonidan juda xilma-xil ishlatilgan va tushunilgan bo'lishi mumkinligini tan oladi.

Arxeologik optika sohasini rivojlantirish

Qadimgi yorug'lik tushunchalarini o'rganish ko'plab xilma-xil manbalardan - arxeologlar, rassomlar, antiqiylar va astronomlar tomonidan ishlab chiqilgan - prekursorlar kamida ming yillikka erishgan. 1998 yilda arxeolog Ronni Skott neolit ​​davri deb taxmin qildi mozorlar Shotlandiyada kamera obscuras sifatida ishlatilgan bo'lishi mumkin.[27] 2000 yilda Robert Temple tergovni e'lon qildi kristalli linzalar bu sana qadimgi davrga tegishli.[28]

Arxeooptikalar hali noma'lum bo'lib, 2005 yildan boshlanib, Mett Gatton va uning hamkasblari tomonidan "Kamera obscura va san'atning kelib chiqishi" ning Kentukki shtatidagi Luisvill universitetida taqdimot bilan boshlandi. Ular keyinchalik 2006 yilda Lissabon Universitetida va 2007 yilda Oksford Universitetidagi Arxeologiya Institutida ma'ruzalar qildilar. Kam sonli tadqiqotchilar mustaqil ravishda Neolit ​​davri qabrlarida arxeologik optik tadqiqotlar olib borishni boshladilar. 2011 yilda Morgan Saletta Frantsiyaning janubidagi ikkita joyda kameraning obscura proektsiyasini qayd etgan maqolasini chop etdi.[29] 2011 yilda Gatton Daniyadagi saytlarda optik proektsiyalarni hujjatlashtirishni boshladi. Aaron Uotson Ronni Skott bilan hamkorlikda 2012 yilda Shotlandiyadagi, 2014 yilda Uelsdagi yodgorliklarning arxeo-optik xususiyatlarini qayd etishni boshladi.[30]

2011 yildan buyon arxeologik optika kontseptsiyasi yanada keng ilmiy yo'nalish sifatida Konstantinos Papadopulos va Xolli Moyesning Arxeologiya bo'yicha Oksford yorug'lik qo'llanmasini rejalashtirish bilan birlashdi, bu esa shu kabi yo'nalishlarda ishlaydigan tadqiqotchilarni aloqaga keltirdi.[31]

Paleolitik arxeologik optika

Paleolitik tuzilmalar

Quyi paleolit ​​davri kabi dastlabki odamlar davri bo'lgan Homo habilis va Homo erectus. Quyi paleolit ​​davrida boshpana qurilishining erta rivojlanishining mumkin bo'lgan ko'rsatkichlari qazishmalar natijasida kelib chiqqan Olduvay darasi,[32] Melka Kunturé,[33] Pont-de-Lava,[34] Isernia La Pineta,[35] Maozhushan,[36] Bilzingsleben,[37] va Terra Amata.[38]

O'rta paleolit ​​davrida Homo erectus ning pasayishi kuzatildi Homo neandertalensis Evrosiyoda rivojlangan va Homo sapiens Afrikada rivojlangan. O'rta paleolitda boshpana qurilishining mumkin bo'lgan dalillarini Port-Pignot,[39] Sent-Vaast-la-Xyu,[40] Le Lazaret,[41] La Baume des Peyrards,[42] Taroqli Grenal,[43] La Butte d'Arvigny,[44] La Foli,[45] La Ferrassi,[46] Binek,[47] Vilas Ruivas,[48] Ripiceni-Izvor,[49] va Molodava I.[50]

Yuqori paleolitda Homo sapiensning kengayishi va Homo neandertalensisning kamayib borishi va yo'q bo'lib ketishi kuzatilgan. Yuqori paleolit ​​davrida boshpana berishning eng yaxshi namunalari Kostienki,[51] Kueva Morin,[52] Grotte du Renne,[53] Vigne-Brune,[54] Dolní Vstonice,[55] Les Peyrugues,[56] Mezin,[57] Ohalo II,[58] Malta,[59] Le Cerisier,[60] Perren platosi,[61] Gonsi,[62] Mejirich,[63] Gonnersdorf,[64] Pincevent,[65] va Bornek.[66]

Taphonomy

Paleolit ​​davri boshpanalarining haqiqiy dalillari tosh va suyak kabi doimiy materiallar bilan cheklangan. Yog'och post yoki hayvon terisi topilmadi, chunki bu materiallar vaqt o'tishi bilan parchalanib ketadi. Ammo buziladigan elementlarning mavjudligini aniqlash mumkin. Postholes yog'och tayanchlarning mavjudligini isbotlaydi. Teshiklarning tekislanishi yoki qo'llab-quvvatlovchi toshlar doirasi ramkaning izlarini tasvirlaydi. Pichoq ishidan va boshqa uy-ro'zg'or ishlaridan tarqalgan toshbo'ron bilan qoplangan maydon strukturaning ichki shaklini yanada chegaralaydi.

Lagerlarda joylashgan toshlar, suyaklar va minerallarning turlari hayvonlarning terisidan chodir qoplamasi sifatida foydalanishni yanada tavsiflaydi. Olov o'chog'i atrofida topilgan so'yilgan va yoqib yuborilgan hayvonlarning suyaklari qaysi turdagi hayvonlar ovlangani va iste'mol qilinganligini ko'rsatadi. Terini tayyorlashda ishlatiladigan terini qirg'ichlar va minerallarning yotqiziqlari kabi toshdan yasalgan vositalar hayvonlarning terisidan muntazam foydalanilishini ko'rsatadi. Bunga qo'shimcha ravishda, etnografik parallelliklar ham mavjud, chunki butun dunyo bo'ylab mahalliy madaniyatlar zamonaviy davr boshlanguniga qadar qoplama materiali sifatida hayvon terilariga tayangan.

Hayot yo'llari

Paleolit ​​davri odamlari qishloq xo'jaligi va hayvonlarni xonakilashtirishdan oldin mavjud bo'lgan va ular kichik guruhlar bo'lib yashagan bo'lar edi. ovchilarni yig'uvchilar, o'simlik, hayvonot va mineral resurslardan foydalanib, joydan joyga ko'chish. Joyni tanlashga ta'sir qiluvchi omillardan ikkitasi chuchuk suvga yaqinligi va hayvonlarning ko'chishi yo'llari edi.[67] Paleolitik yem-xashak egalari, shuningdek, tuyoqli o'to't hayvonlar podalari yashaydigan dalalarga qaraydigan lager tashkil qilar edi.[68]

Paleolit ​​lagerlari takroriy, mavsumiy, qisqa muddatli ishg'ol bilan ajralib turardi. Aholisi yuk ko'taradigan hayvonlarsiz juda harakatchan bo'lsa-da, boshpanalar tashilmadi. Chodir buzilishidan va tiklanishidan oldin bir necha yil davomida o'z o'rnida turishi mumkin edi. Arxeologik yozuvlarda, xuddi shu joyda qayta-qayta qurilgan boshpanalar tasvirlangan. Paleolit ​​davridagi ovchilarni yig'ish guruhlari yo'l bo'ylab strategik nuqtalarda qurilgan boshpanalar bilan har yili ko'chib o'tdilar.

Ochoqlar

Paleolit ​​lagerlari tashqi yong'in o'choqlari va ichki o'choqlari bilan nuqta edi. Ichki o'choqlar ochiq olovli o'tin emas, balki isitilgan toshlar va ko'mirni ushlab turadigan ichi bo'sh joylar edi.[69] Olovlar turar joyni issiq ushlab turish uchun issiqlik energiyasi saqlanib, vaqt o'tishi bilan asta-sekin ajralib turadigan issiqlik batareyalari yoki issiqlik ushlagichlari vazifasini bajargan. Issiq toshlar va ko'mirlar tayoq yoki suyaklar bilan qalin hayvon terisiga o'ralgan va o'txonadan o'choqqa bir necha metr masofada uzatilgan bo'lar edi. Ertasi kuni topshiriq takrorlanadi: o'choqlar ajratilib, muntazam ravishda yig'ilib turardi. Tez-tez qizib ketish natijasida toshlar rangsizlanib, parchalanib ketgan. Bir marta tosh issiqlikni ushlab turishda samarasiz bo'lib qolgandan so'ng, uni hayvonlar suyaklari va boshqa maishiy chiqindilar bilan birga yaqin atrofdagi chiqindi chuquriga tashladilar. Ichki tosh o'choq - iliq turishning samarali strategiyasi, ammo u hech qanday yorug'lik bermadi.[70] Keyinchalik chodirlarning ichki qismi xira joylar edi, qadimgi odamlar kameraning obscura effektiga guvoh bo'lishgan.

Paleolitik arxeologik optika

Paleolitik arxeologik optika paleolit ​​davridagi chodirni qayta tiklashning tasvirni proektsion imkoniyatlarini tekshirishni o'z ichiga oladi.

Qayta qurish

Paleolitik chodirlar / boshpanalarning tasodifan kamerani obscura shakllanishiga yaroqliligi 2005 va 2006 yillarda Mett Gatton rahbarligida o'tkazilgan bir qator eksperimentlar davomida o'rganilgan.[71] Birinchi eksperimentlar to'plami Kentukki shtatining Oldxem okrugidagi bizon fermasida bo'lib o'tdi, u erda kichik, ibtidoiy bizon yashiringan. teepee yaylov yonida qurilgan va bizon tasvirlari teridagi teshikdan tashlanib, chodirga proyeksiyalangan. Ikkinchi eksperimentlar to'plami Kentukki shtatining Estill okrugi Irvin shahridan tashqaridagi toshlardan saqlanadigan joyda sodir bo'ldi, u erda tergovchilar daraxt shoxlarini tosh devoriga suyab, bizon terilari bilan qopladilar. Tashqaridagi ot tasviri teridagi qo'pol tuynuk orqali va ichki makonga proyeksiyalangan edi. Uchinchi eksperimentlar to'plami Belgiyadagi Du Malgré-Tout muzeyida bo'lib o'tdi, u erda arxeologlar Pyer Kattelayn va Kler Bellier Frantsiya, Germaniya va Ukrainaning bir necha joylarida turli xil paleolitik inshootlarni tikladilar. Har bir chodirning qopqog'ida teshiklar bor edi. Nemis saytida tasvirlar qayta qurish ichida quyon terisida aks ettirilgan.

Statistik tahlil

Chodirni rekonstruktsiya qilish Paleolit ​​davrida kameraning obscura shakllanishining tasodifiy shakllanishining ba'zi bir mantiqiyligini aniqladi, ammo ishonuvchanlik ehtimollik emas, shuning uchun prognoz qilinayotgan tasvirlarning chastotasi ehtimoli Bayesiyalik statistik modellashtirish.[72]

Noma'lum hodisa ehtimolini baholash uchun imkoniyat daraxtini yaratish uchun bir qator shartli ehtimolliklar ishlatilgan TreeAge Pro 2011 (Uilyamstaun, MA). Rejalashtirilgan tasvirlarning ko'rinishiga ta'sir qiluvchi holatlar boshpananing umumiy konteksti, diafragmaning mavjudligi, diafragma kattaligi, quyosh nurlari, ob-havo, yashash joyi va uyning o'ziga xos kontekstidir. O'zgaruvchilarga nisbatan har xil vaziyatlarni hisobga olgan holda; paleolitik uy ichida proektsiyalangan tasvirni kuzatayotgan odamning ehtimolligi kuniga 1% dan 8% gacha yoki yiliga 4 dan 29 martagacha bo'lgan.[73] Yillik hodisalarni yillar oralig'iga va taxminiy odam soniga ko'paytirish; kameraning obscura tasvirlari 54,8 milliarddan 4,38 trillion baravargacha (5,48x10) kuzatilishi mumkin edi10 4.38x10 gacha12) tarixgacha.[74]

Ta'siri

Tarixdan oldingi fotoapparatlarning insoniyat tajribasi davomida keng tarqalishi san'at, diniy e'tiqodlar, falsafa va mavjud g'or san'atining rivojlanishi uchun bir necha muhim natijalarni keltirib chiqaradi.

San'at

San'atning kelib chiqishi muhim sir bo'lib kelgan, chunki aloqa shakli sifatida san'at asosan a ijtimoiy qurilish. Asosiy masala shundaki, bunday tasvirni iloji borligini bilmasdan ob'ekt yoki sahnani namoyish etish niyati bo'lishi mumkin emas.[75] Tadqiqotchilar prehistorik odamlar vakillik imkoniyati g'oyasiga qanday qilib birinchi marta qoqilganligi haqida tushuntirishlar berishda katta qiyinchiliklarga duch kelishdi.[76] Arxeooptik tushuntirish shundan iboratki, Kembrij professori Nayjel Spiveyning so'zlariga ko'ra, taqdim etilgan turar-joy binolari ichida tasvirlangan tasvirlar, "... vakillik tushunchasini keltirib chiqaradigan prototipik vizual tajriba ..."[77] Bundan tashqari, tasvirlar chodirda yoki inshootda bir vaqtning o'zida hamma tomonidan ko'riladigan tajribalar bilan o'rtoqlashiladi.[78] Shunday qilib, guruh o'zlarining yuzalarida aks ettirilgan tasvirlarni birgalikda tajriba qilishi, muhokama qilishi, tekshirishi, tasdiqlashi, tekshirishi va izohlashi mumkin edi. Tasviriy san'atning rivojlanishini ijtimoiy jihatdan amalga oshiradigan obrazlarning kommunal tomoni.

"Tasodifiy proektsiyalangan tasvir haqiqiy ob'ektni anglatadi; u bizonni go'sht va qon zuboni bo'lmasdan aytadi, referent g'oyasini ekadi, san'atning kontseptual boshlanishi." -Mat Gatton[79]

Iymon

Kamera obscura tasvirlari diniy e'tiqodni kuchaytirishi mumkin. Dinning keng ta'rifi - bu jismoniy haqiqatga ta'sir qiluvchi muqobil sohaga bo'lgan ishonch. Dinshunos Rudolf Otto dinning kelib chiqishi muqaddas tushunchada, ilohiy o'zini "butunlay boshqacha" narsa (ganz andere) sifatida ko'rsatishda tushuniladi degan fikrda.[80] Paleolit ​​davridagi chodirlarda aks ettirilgan tasvirlar bir lahzada ko'rilmagan narsaga ishonishni boshlagan muqobil soha tushunchasi, "boshqasi" tushunchasi uchun dastlabki eshikni taklif qilgan bo'lar edi. Bir paytlar ko'rilgan tasvirlar ongda saqlanib, madaniyatda ildiz otgan.

"Kamera tasviri bir zumda kvazi haqiqatni haqiqatdan uzoqlashtirmoqda," boshqa "ni" bor "dan tozalab tashlamoqda; hayvonlar, o'simliklar va odamlarda boshqa shakllarda, ruhlarda va boshqa tekisliklarda mavjudlik borligi haqidagi g'oyani singdirish ». - Mett Gatton[81]

Muqobil shohlik tushunchasi ildiz otgandan so'ng, u "boshqa" dunyo agentlari uchun odamlarning ishlariga aralashishi uchun imkoniyat yaratgan bo'lar edi. Ruh shakllari tushunchasi - bu dinning ma'lum bo'lgan eng qadimgi va ehtimol birinchi shaklidir. Tasodifiy tasvir, ehtimol, "ilohiy" ning birinchi qarashidir.[82]

Falsafa

Metafizikaning asosiy masalasi voqelikning mohiyatini o'rganishdir. Paleolitik chodirdagi tasvirlar voqelikning mohiyati haqidagi fikrlar kaskadini keltirib chiqarishi mumkin edi: nima bu mavjudlik tekisligi? Va refleksli ravishda, bu nima bu samolyotmi?[83] Faqatgina muqobil haqiqatni ko'rib, ushbu haqiqat shubha ostiga olinadi - mavhum imtihonning boshlanishi.

Sxematik buzilishlar

Kamera obscura proektsiyalari, shuningdek, hayvonlar va odamlarning g'or rasmlari orasida ba'zi umumiy xususiyatlarni tushuntirishi mumkin. Paleolit g'or san'ati odatda juda kichik boshlari va juda katta, ko'pincha egilib turadigan tanalari bilan tasvirlangan, sxematik shakllar bilan mashhur. Ba'zi paleolit ​​madaniyati vizual leksikasining asosiy elementlari misollari - takrorlash, uzish, harakatlanish, ustma-ust joylashish va buzilish - yashash joylari ichidagi yassi toshlar va suyaklarga, shuningdek chuqur g'orlarning devorlariga o'yib yozilgan.[84]

2005 yil may oyida Mett Gatton, Uolter Brok va Dilan Brok Kentukki shtatining Harrodsburg shahridagi fermada xona o'lchamidagi kamera obscurasini o'rnatdilar. Kichkina yassi toshga otning tasviri tushirilgan edi. Rassom tasvirni tanasi, gavdaga mahkamlangan o'yma tosh va teskari tasvirga ko'zlarini tikkan holda tutishi tabiiy edi. Ushbu stsenariyda toshni ozgina egish foydali bo'ldi. Tosh qanchalik qiyshaygan bo'lsa, hayvonlar qiyofasi shunchalik buzilganki, hayvonning boshi kichrayib, oshqozon pastga egilib, xuddi ba'zi bir chuqur g'or san'atlaridagi buzilishlarga o'xshaydi.[85] Ushbu buzilish asosiy tosh effekti. Gatton chuqur g'orning buzilishlari kameralardagi palatkalardagi obscura effektlaridan kelib chiqishi mumkin deb taxmin qildi.[86]

Paleolitik arxeooptik tushunchalar keng madaniyatda

Paleolitik odamlar o'zlarining boshpanalarida kameraning obscura effektlarini ko'rganligi haqidagi gipoteza - Gattonning paleolitik kamerasi obscura nazariyasi - so'nggi bir necha yil ichida, shu jumladan quyidagi joylarda aniq ma'lumotlarga ega bo'lgan keng qamrovga ega bo'ldi.

  • Doktor Nayjel Spivey: "Dunyo qanday qilib san'at yaratdi: Kembrijdagi intervyular: 2-qism," Kun rasmlari tug'ilgan "KCET / BBC, 2006 yil 22-iyun. Mark Xedjeko tomonidan ishlab chiqarilgan va rejissyor Robin Dashvud.[87]
  • Malda Pédagogique-dagi "Le cinéma / Pré-cinéma" ko'rgazmasi, Frantsiyaning Kan shahridagi Kalvadosdagi Cinema kolleji (2009-2010).
  • 2014 yil Belgiyaning Leuven shahrida o'tkazilgan Artefact festivali Gattonning paleolitik kamerasi obscura nazariyasi, "De Prehistorie van het Beeld" (Tasvirning tarixiy tarixi) mavzusida bo'lib o'tdi. Per Kattelayn va Kler Bellier va ularning guruhi "Malge-Tout" muzeyidan Tweebronnen jamoat kutubxonasidagi atriumda Le Ceriser paleolitiga oid (taxminan 18000 mil.) Chodirning nusxasini qurdilar. Gatton tashrif buyuruvchilarga chodir ichida qanday tasvirlar tushirilganligini ko'rsatish uchun edi.[88] Festivaldan so'ng, chodir qismlarga ajratildi va doimiy o'rnatish uchun Musée du Malgré-Tout muzeyiga etkazildi.
  • AQShda birinchi bo'lib 2014 yil 6 aprelda namoyish etilgan "1-faslning kosmosdagi kosmosdagi kosmik vaqti: Odisseya" ning "Nurda yashirinish" seriyasining boshlanishi. Serial National Geographic kanali va FOX bilan hamkorlikda ishlab chiqarilgan va Enn Druyan va Stiven Soter tomonidan yozilgan va Nil deGrasse Tayson tomonidan rivoyat qilingan.
  • BU rasm, Podkast №1: Qadimgi kamera (Obscura kamerasi). "Chelsi" va "Toni Nortrup" tomonidan uyushtirilgan, "Art of Art and Photography", 2016 yil 25-yanvar

Neolitik arxeologik optika

The Neolitik davr qurilgan me'morchilik doirasida optik tasvir proektsiyalarini o'rganish imkoniyatini beradi. Neolitik inshootlar oddiy uylardan tortib to ulkan qafas va tepaliklarga qadar bo'lgan bo'lib, ular er, yog'och va tosh birikmalaridan foydalangan holda qurilgan. Arxeotik-optik dala ishlariga e'tibor qaratildi megalitik yodgorliklar.

Megalitik tuzilmalar

Megalitlar yoki yirik toshlar me'moriy taqdimotlarning ikkita asosiy turiga kiradi: mustaqil va er bilan qoplangan. Alohida va turgan toshlarning guruhlari - doiralar, chiziqlar, tasvirlar, "U" shakllari yoki to'rtburchaklar shakllanishida - ular ustidagi tuproq og'irligini ushlab turish uchun ishlatilmadi, lekin marker sifatida xizmat qildi. Tuproq, maysazor, moloz yoki toshning og'irligini ko'tarish uchun mo'ljallangan megalitik kameralar guruhlarga, shu jumladan dolmenlar, portal dolmenlari, galereya qabrlari, xanjar qabrlari, mozorlar va sud qabrlari. "Dolmen" atamasi katta o'lchamdagi rudimentar stol singari bitta katta, yassi tom tomondagi toshni qo'llab-quvvatlaydigan o'rnatilgan toshlarning guruhlanishini tavsiflaydi. "Portal dolmenlari" burchakli tosh taxtaga ega bo'lib, ular ko'pincha kirish joyi bo'lgan kamerani belgilaydigan tik ustunlar tomonidan qo'llab-quvvatlanadi. "Galereya" qabrlari bir qator tekis tom toshlarini (lintellarni) qo'llab-quvvatlovchi ikki qatorli tik toshlardan (ortostatlar) iborat uzun bo'yli dolmenlardir. "Takoz" qabrlari og'zidan kengroq va ichkariga qarab orqaga qarab torayib boradi. "O'tish qabrlari" ko'milgan kameraga olib boradigan toshdan qurilgan uzun yo'lakka ega. "Sud" qabrlari shunday nomlangan, chunki ular qabr xonasi oldida turgan toshlar bilan o'ralgan hovliga o'xshaydi. Ushbu tuzilmalarning aksariyati hozirgi kunda mustaqil yodgorlik sifatida ko'rinsa-da, ularning toshlari ko'pincha eroziya yoki inson ta'sirida olib tashlangan tepaliklarning skelet asoslari bo'lgan.

Megalitik kameralar uchun asosiy e'tibor G'arbiy Evropada: Skandinaviya, Britaniya orollari, Frantsiya va Iberiyada. Ularning kelib chiqishi, xronologiyasi va maqsadi doimiy tadqiqotlar va munozaralarning mavzusidir. Darhaqiqat, ular Evropa bilan cheklanib qolmay, Evroosiyo va butun dunyo bo'ylab uchraydi. O'tgan madaniyatlarda ularning ahamiyati ularni yaratish uchun zarur bo'lgan mehnat va resurslar bilan taklif qilinadi. Zo'r va murakkab tarzda qurilgan tepaliklar muhim ishlarga aylandi, ularni qurish uchun o'n minglab soat talab qilingan. Masalan, har yili ikki oy davomida doimiy ravishda ishlaydigan 400 kishidan iborat ishchi kuchi Newgrange-da 200 ming tonna zinapoyani qurish uchun taxminan 16 yil vaqt sarf qilishi kerak edi.[89]

Britaniya orollari va Irlandiyada har xil kamerali yodgorliklar, shu jumladan yog'ochdan yasalgan yodgorliklar optik hodisani yaratishga moslashgan bo'lishi mumkin. So'nggi tadqiqotlar, xususan, bitta formatga e'tibor qaratdi: megalitik o'tish qabri.

Maqbaralar o'tish joyi

O'tish qabrlari toshga qurilgan bitta o'tish yo'lidan iborat bo'lib, markaziy kameraga kirish imkoniyatini beradi va u erda qo'shni xonalar yoki kameralar bo'lishi mumkin. Ushbu qurilish butunlay tuproq, moloz, maysazor yoki loydan iborat bo'lishi mumkin bo'lgan tepalik bilan qoplangan. Ularning tarqalishi Evropaning g'arbiy qismida tarqaladi. Ushbu saytlarning aniq raqamlarini aniqlash ko'pchilikning yomon saqlanib qolishi sababli muammoli. Irlandiyada bir yuz ellikdan ziyod o'tmishdagi qabrlar mavjud bo'lib, ularning umumiy bahosi uch yuzdan oshadi,[90] Daniyada taxminan besh yuz,[91] va Shotlandiyada 250 dan ortiq.[92] Ularning tasnifi Orkney-Kromarti, Maeshove va Klavaning an'analari kabi guruhlarga bo'lingan, ammo barchasi bir xil asosiy formatni saqlab qolgan. Ularning qurilishi, ehtimol 5600 miloddan ko'p o'tmay, avvalgi neolit ​​davrida boshlangan[93] va Clava Cairn dafn etilgan qabrlarning qazib olingan namunalarida 4000 BP atrofida tarqaladi,[94] ammo bu ular shu vaqt ichida qurilgan yoki ishlatilgan degani emas.

Maqbarani saqlash

O'tish qabrlarining omon qolishi o'zgaruvchan va ko'plab omillarga bog'liq. Keyinchalik Klavadagi Balnuaranda joylashgan neolit ​​davriga oid ikkita qabrni qazish, ularning me'morchiligi tabiatan beqaror ekanligini va ular qurilganidan keyin o'nlab yillar ichida qulab tushishini ko'rsatdi.[95] Avvalgi misollar, shu jumladan Orkney-Kromarti formati, umuman, yanada mustahkamroq edi. O'tish qabrlari keyingi davrlarda, shu jumladan temir asri va o'rta asrning boshlarida ham qayta ishlatilishi mumkin edi va ba'zan ularning neolit ​​davri tarkibi olib tashlangan. Ularning ustiga yangi inshootlar qurilganda, ba'zilari yo'q qilindi.[96] Ularning aksariyati jamoatchilikka kirish uchun konsolidatsiya, qayta qurish yoki kuchaytirishni talab qilmoqda. Boyne vodiysida Newgrange va Knowth muhim qazish va tiklash ishlarini olib bordi.[97][98] Orkneyda XII asrda vikinglar tomonidan etkazilgan zarar tufayli Maeshove ichidagi palataning tomi tiklandi.[99] Ba'zi hollarda, so'nggi qurilish ishlari ularning ko'rinishini sezilarli darajada o'zgartirdi, bu ularning o'tish joylari va kameralari ichidagi optik hodisalarni kuzatish va talqin qilishda hisobga olinishi kerak bo'lgan hal qiluvchi omil.

Foydalanish jumboqlari

Evropa bo'ylab o'tadigan qabrlar azaldan afsona va rivoyatlar uchun diqqat markazida bo'lib kelgan. O'rta asrlarning ilm-fanida sehrgarlar, gigantlar, jodugarlar yoki jinlar buyuk toshlarni o'rnatganligi va tepaliklar gnomes, elflar, hayvonlar va goblinlarning uyi bo'lganligi aytilgan.[100] Daniyada o'tish qabrlari hali ham jættestuer (trol uylari) deb nomlanadi. Irlandiyalik xalq ertaklarini tahlil qilish shuni ko'rsatdiki, megalitik qo'rg'onlar qadimgi qahramonlarning dafn etilgan joyi sifatida ham xizmat qilgan va g'ayritabiiy mavjudotlar turar joyi bo'lgan.[101]

Ko'pgina o'tish qabrlarida haqiqatan ham o'liklarning qoldiqlari bor, ba'zida ular juda ko'p. Masalan, qazish ishlari Quanterness turli yoshdagi 157 kishining suyaklarini aniqladi, ammo qabrda saqlanganlarning umumiy soni 400 ga yaqin bo'lishi mumkin.[102] Hayvonlarning qoldiqlari va eksponatlari, shuningdek, ba'zi joylarda, shu jumladan boncuklar, tosh to'plar va sopol idishlar.

Ko'rinib turibdiki, dafn marosimi "qabrlar" ning yagona vazifasi emas edi. Ba'zi saytlarda odamlarning qoldiqlari to'g'risida ozgina dalillar mavjud, ammo bu ularning keyingi tarixlarini aks ettirishi mumkin, boshqalarida esa tiriklar tomonidan olib boriladigan faoliyat uchun dalillar mavjud. Orkneydagi saytlarda yong'inlar yoqildi[103] va Irlandiyadagi Nouit, Dowth va Newgrange-da tasvirlar o'zlarining ichki qismidagi toshlar ustiga joyida o'yilgan misollar mavjud.[104][105] Yilning muhim davrlarida bir nechta joylardagi parchalar quyosh chiqishi yoki quyosh botishi bilan mos keladi, buning natijasida ularning qoraygan xonalari yoritiladi. Ko'pchilik ajoyib akustik xususiyatlarini namoyish etadi. Ushbu omillar birgalikda dafn etilgan qabrlarni tiriklar va o'liklar bilan bog'liq bo'lgan turli xil tadbirlar o'tkaziladigan joy sifatida talqin qilish mumkin.

O'tish maqbaralaridan kamera obscuras sifatida foydalanish

O'tish maqbaralarining optik xususiyatlarini o'rganadigan asosiy dala ishlari Daniyada Mett Gatton, Frantsiyada Morgan Saletta, Uelsda Aaron Uotson, Shotlandiyada Aaron Uotson va Ronni Skott va Ispaniyada Eva Bosch tomonidan olib borilgan.

Formatlash

Maqbaralar formati optik proektsiyalarni yaratish va boshqarish uchun juda mos keladi. Ushbu tuzilmalar kameraning obscurasining asosiy formatini takrorlaydi[106] va dala ishlari haqiqatan ham ajoyib proektsion imkoniyatlarga ega bo'lishlarini namoyish etdi.[107] Kamera qorong'i bo'shliqni taqdim etadi, bitta o'tish yo'li esa yorug'lik harakatini diqqat bilan boshqarishga imkon beradi. Ba'zi hollarda ularning asosiy konfiguratsiyasi proektsiyani amalga oshirish uchun etarli,[108] va oz sonli mexanizmlar yorug'likni yaqindan boshqarish mumkin bo'lgan mexanizmlarni taklif qiladi. Masalan, Newgrange-dagi tomning qutisida optik proektsiyalarni boshqarish uchun ishlatilishi mumkin bo'lgan kvarts bloklarini qayta-qayta ko'chirish uchun dalillar mavjud.[109] Aksariyat hollarda, qo'shimcha teshiklarni talab qilishgan.

Kirish cheklangan

Ko'pgina o'tish qabrlari kirish joylari vaqtincha turli xil usullar bilan muhrlanganga o'xshaydi: toshlar, plitalar, bloklar, taxtalar yoki yog'och ramkalar, buni kirish joyidagi teshiklar tasdiqlaydi. Maeshove o'tish joyi yonida chuqurchaga ega bo'lib, uning o'rnini burish mumkin bo'lgan puxta muvozanatli portal toshini ushlab turadi.[110] Bu ushbu blokning yuqori qismi va o'tish joylari o'rtasida tor bo'shliqni qoldiradi, shu bilan hatto o'tish joyi odamlar o'tib bo'lmaydigan bo'lsa ham yorug'likning kirib kelishiga imkon beradi.[111] Aksincha, Newgrange-dagi tom qutisi, Carrowkeel-dagi Cairn G-da taqqoslanadigan xususiyat bo'lgani kabi, o'tish joyi ustida joylashgan. Ushbu teshiklarni mustaqil ravishda parchalargacha boshqarish mumkin edi. Bunday qurilmalar bo'lmagan taqdirda ham yodgorlikni operativ kamerali obscuraga aylantirish uchun faqat mayda qo'shimchalar - tosh bloklar, yog'och taxtadagi teshik yoki hayvon ustunidan ustunlar orasiga osilgan bo'lishi kerak. O'tish yorug'lik uchun kanal bo'lib xizmat qiladi va kameraning orqa qismi proektsion sirt vazifasini bajaradi.

Diafragma tekisligi

The character of optical projections within passage tombs is determined by a number of interconnected factors. Lighting inside the monument needs to be low but total darkness is not always required, depending on the relative brightness outside.[112][113] Observations at the Grey Cairns of Camster by Aaron Watson and Ronnie Scott showed that it was possible to cast projections in fog, rain and under heavy cloud, but that such conditions significantly impaired their clarity.[114] The size and brightness of projections can be adjusted both by modifying the size of the aperture and moving the aperture plane itself in relation to the focal plane, which is frequently the wall of the chamber aligned with the passageway. Increasing the focal distance by moving the aperture along the passage increases the size of the projection but also reduces its brightness. Reducing the aperture diameter results in a more focused, but increasingly dark, image. A further contributing factor is the texture of the surface upon which the image is projected. For example, observations by Aaron Watson have revealed that the slab that constitutes the back wall of the chamber at Bryn Celli Ddu is smooth enough to carry a detailed image.[115] In contrast, projections inside Cuween Hill fall upon rough stone walling, requiring the distance between the aperture and focal plane to be increased, thereby enlarging the image in order to render it visible.[116]

Types of images projected within Neolithic passage tombs

Images of the sun

When aligned upon the sun, a properly configured passage tomb is capable of casting an enlarged image of the solar disc. As long as the aperture remains static this projected solar disc will move along the wall as the sun moves across the sky. During sunrise, for example, the sun's image will appear to travel across the chamber and then out along the walls of the passageway. Gatton has suggested that images carved upon the chamber walls of Cairn T at Loughcrew may reproduce these movements of the sun's disc.[117]

In 2011, archaeologist Morgan Saletta reported solar projections within the sites of Grotte de Bounias and Grotte de la Source during equinoctial sunsets. These were a result of the architectural format of these monuments creating sufficiently restricted apertures to cast a distinct, though unfocused, projection.[118]

During the time of midsummer sunrise in 2014 and 2015, Aaron Watson documented solar projections within Bryn Celli Ddu. By locating the aperture close to the chamber it was possible to cast a distinct image of nearby trees and the rising sun, together framed by the outline of the passage. In contrast, relocating the aperture to the passage entrance significantly enlarged the sun's disc to a diameter of 10 cm.[119]

Images of aligned monuments

If a passage tomb is aligned upon another monument, the camera obscura method can be used to project recognisable images of that monument into the chamber. For example, while the setting sun shines directly into Maeshowe's chamber when the sun is at its southwestern extreme (winter solstice sunset), there is also a reverse alignment (summer solstice sunrise) when the sun is at its northeastern extreme. This will illuminate the distant Barnhouse Stone such that its image could be projected inside Maeshowe's chamber.[120]

At Balnuaran of Clava, two neighbouring passage tombs share a south-westerly axis in order that their passageways open towards the midwinter sunset.[121] Not only does the cairn to the south-west appear centrally framed when looking down the passage from that to the north-east, but fieldwork by Ronnie Scott and Tim Phillips has documented how the midwinter setting sun appears to descend directly into the apex of its roof.[122]

Images of the landscape

Many passage tombs are set in elevated situations with extensive views, or even focused upon distinctive topographic features. These would therefore appear within optical projections inside their chambers. Aaron Watson has documented optical projections inside Cuween Hill, Orkney, that feature expansive views across the Bay of Firth. Inside the Dwarfie Stane, also in Orkney, it is possible to cast a panoramic image of the uplands of Hoy.[123]

While the majority of passage tombs may have lost their lintels and roofs it is possible to consider the views that may originally have been projected into their chambers. For example, the ruinous site of Badnabay, north-west Scotland, appears to be aligned upon a mountain with a distinctive profile.[124]

Images of people

Reflected sunlight can illuminate people located within passage tomb forecourts, creating what Gatton has described as "spirit" projections due to their ephemeral, spectral qualities.[125] When backlit these figures appear as dark silhouettes, but at those times when the sun is behind the monument, and the forecourt area brightly lit, they are enhanced in color and detail. Aaron Watson has photographed optical projections of people inside Cuween Hill, Wideford Hill, Vinquoy Hill, the Dwarfie Stane and the Grey Cairns of Camster.[126]

Camera obscura projections are animated in a manner akin to cinematography and, while projected human figures appear upside down and back to front, they move in real time. This creates distinctive illusions where individuals, or even groups of people, can appear to emerge from the chamber wall. As the angles between the external subject and the aperture become increasingly oblique, projections can also be cast upon the floor, walls and ceiling of a monument. This can create the illusion of a human shadow moving through the passage tomb.[127]

Immersive multisensory experiences within passage tombs

Passage tomb architecture spatially constrains the number of people who can simultaneously occupy their chambers, effectively restricting access to specialist kinds of knowledge[128] and unusual combinations of sensory experience. Whether these sites embody astronomical orientations, occupy special places in the landscape, or acted as the receptacles for ancestral remains, the camera obscura theory expands the significance and meaning of light entering these monuments.

Inverted images of the outside world, viewed by people located in the depths of a megalithic cairn, would very effectively generate a sense of "otherness".[129] Furthermore, people in the Neolithic did not share present-day knowledge of optical physics, and would have had their own understandings. Even from a scientific perspective, however, the act of witnessing the projection of the sun's disc, or human figures emerging from a stone wall, is rather suggestive of an encounter with the supernatural. It has been suggested that projections of the sun may have been interpreted as the manifestation of a Neolithic solar deity.[130]

Finally, optical projections converge with other sensory qualities of these places, potentially including the presence of the remains of the dead, rock art, and dynamic archaeo-acoustic sound effects. There is also a possibility that these kinds of experiences were combined and choreographed in order to maximize their theatrical impact upon an audience.[131] Rather than silent places of the death, passage tombs may have acted as places where people could engage with powerful multi-sensory experiences that transported their occupants to other dimensions, or brought them into the presence of forces that are difficult to imagine in the present day.

Ancient Egyptian funerary monuments

The Ancient Egyptians may have also witnessed—and recorded—camera obscura effects. Ancient Egyptian texts, known collectively as the Books of the Netherworld, describe pharaonic funerary complexes as sun-powered resurrection machines that somehow affected a merger of the pharaoh's soul with the sun god.[132] The continuation of the entire cosmos was dependent upon the sun god who was regenerated in darkness.[133]

The ancient Egyptian concept of the pharaonic soul was complicated and divided into several aspects. The ka jihat was a spirit double, created at birth, with the physical appearance of the person. After death, the ka would leave the body and travel through the underworld at night and return to its physical representation (the mummy, statue, or artworks) each morning. Fir'avn mortuary temples, which faced east toward the dawn sun and were affixed to the side of piramidalar during the pyramid building era, featured a darkened inner sanctuary with a ka statue of the pharaoh. When the sun rose on the horizon, its rays would travel down the central passageway of the temple, and project the image of the sun onto the ka and, conversely, reflect the ka back to the sun, uniting the two.[134] This is the conceptual leap that underpins Ancient Egyptian culture — the pharaoh's soul road on a beam of light.[135]

Ancient Greek mystery cult rites

Mystery religions dominated the Mediterranean sphere during classical antiquity. The foremost Mystery sect was the hallowed rite of the Goddess Persephone at Eleusis, Greece, which held sway for nearly two thousand years (from at least 1500 BCE until the end of fourth century CE). The Eleusiniyalik sirlar started out as a small localized religion, grew steadily, and were adopted as part of the state religion of nearby Athens around 600 BCE.

Inside the dark cavernous temple was a sacred smaller building that held cult objects, normally sculptural idols, and a very bright fire. In the temple, the initiates had a direct face-to-face experience with the gods, who appeared as phantoms of light. Plato describes initiates experiencing "perfect, simple, calm, and blissful apparitions [eudaímona phásmata] in a pure light …" (Fedrus 250c ).

The optical principle of the camera obscura — an image cast into a dark area from an adjacent bright area via a small aperture — works irrespective of the scale of the dark and light areas. If the inside of a room is made very bright and the outside is very dark then a hole will cast the image from the smaller space to the larger, rather like a movie projector in a theater.[136] Matt Gatton has proposed the priests (or priestesses) at Eleusis had operated a rudimentary projection booth, an "Eleusinian Projector", where the priest's holy fire-room acted as the box of light and the dark cavernous space crowded with initiates was the theater.

“The initiates were not directing their attention toward the priest or the sacred house, but looking the other direction at spectral images that they believed were gods, shining and moving about…” -Matt Gatton[137]

Qo'shimcha o'qish

Papadopoulos C. and Moyes, H., eds. (2016). The Oxford Handbook of Light in Archaeology. Oksford: Oksford universiteti matbuoti.

Tashqi havolalar

Adabiyotlar

  1. ^ Gatton, M. (2009). "First Light: Inside the Palaeolithic camera obscura." In Acts of Seeing: Artists, Scientists and the History of the Visual -- a volume dedicated to Martin Kemp (Assimina Kaniari and Marina Wallace, eds.) London: Zidane. 153.
  2. ^ Explanation of camera obscura operations derived from Pollack, P. (1969). The Picture History of Photography: From the Earliest Beginnings to the Present Day. Nyu-York: Garri N. Abrams. 18.
  3. ^ Gernsheim, H. and Gernsheim, A. (1969). The History of Photography: From the Camera Obscura to the Beginning of the Modern Era. Nyu-York: McGraw-Hill. 17.
  4. ^ Perry, D. (1988). Life above the Jungle Floor. Nyu-York: Simon va Shuster. 46-47.
  5. ^ Renner, E. (2004). Pinhole Photography: Rediscovering a Historic Technique (3rd ed). Oksford: Focal Press. 3.
  6. ^ For a good overview of Palaeolithic dwellings structures and strategies see Cattelain, P. and Hauzeur, A. (1998). "Des premiers abris aux premières maisons." In Les grandes inventions de la Préhistoire (Bellier C. and Cattelain, P. eds.) (Guides archéologiques du Malgré-Tout) Treignes: CEDARC. 37-46; and De Beaune, S. (2012). "Aux origins de la construction." In Édifice et Artifice (R. Carvais, A. Guillerme, V. Nègre, J. Sakarovitch, eds.) Premier Congrès francophone d’histoire de la construction Paris, 2008 Paris: Piccard. 77-89.
  7. ^ O’Kelly, M. (1982). Newgrange. Archaeology, Art and Legend. London, Temza va Xadson. 117, 123-5.
  8. ^ MacKie, E.W. (1997). "Maeshowe and the Winter Solstice: ceremonial aspects of the Orkney Grooved Ware culture." Antiquity 71. 338-59.
  9. ^ Burrow, S. (2010). "Bryn Celli Ddu Passage Tomb, Anglesey: Alignment, Construction, Date and Ritual." In Proceedings of the Prehistoric Society 76. 261.
  10. ^ Scott, R. and Phillips, T. (1999). "Clava: Light at the End of the Tunnel." Current Archaeology 165. 332-5.
  11. ^ Scott, R. and Phillips, T. (1998). "Archaeological experiment at Balnuaran of Clava North Eastern cairn on 20th and 22nd December 1997." In Sites and Monuments Archive: <http://her.highland.gov.uk/hbsmrgatewayhighland/DataFiles/LibraryLinkFiles/37677.pdf >
  12. ^ Woodward, A.B. and Woodwood, P.J. (1996). "The topography of some barrow cemeteries in Bronze Age Wessex." In Proceedings of the Prehistoric Society 62. 275-91.
  13. ^ Bradley, R. (1998). Ruined buildings, ruined stones: enclosures, tombs and natural places in the Neolithic of south-west England. World Archaeology 30. 13-22.
  14. ^ Ruggles, C. (1999). Astronomy in Prehistoric Britain and Ireland. London: Yel universiteti matbuoti.
  15. ^ Jones, A. and MacGregor, G., eds. (2002). Colouring the past: the significance of colour in archaeological research. London: Berg.
  16. ^ Howes, D. and Classen, C., eds. (1991). The varieties of sensory experience. London: Berg.
  17. ^ Classen, C., Howes, D., and Synnott, A. (1994). Aroma: the cultural history of smell. London: Routledge.
  18. ^ Hamilakis, Y. (1999). "Food technologies/technologies of the body: the social context of wine and oil production and consumption in Bronze Age Crete." In World Archaeology 31(1). 38-54.
  19. ^ Cummings, V. (2002). "Experiencing texture and transformation in the British Neolithic."In Oxford Journal of Archaeology 21(3). 249-61.
  20. ^ Scarre, C and Lawson, G., eds. (2006). Archaeoacoustics. Kembrij: Arxeologik tadqiqotlar uchun McDonald instituti.
  21. ^ Megaw, J.V.S. (1960). "Penny whistles and prehistory." Antiquity 34, 6-13.
  22. ^ Lund. C. (1981). "The archaeomusicology of Scandinavia." In World Archaeology 12. 246-65.
  23. ^ Dams, L. (1984). "Preliminary findings at the ‘Organ’ Sanctuary in the cave of Nerja, Malaga, Spain." In Oxford Journal of Archaeology 3. 1-14.
  24. ^ Reznikoff, I. and Dauvois, M. (1988). "La dimension sonore des grottes ornées." In Bulletin de la Société Préhistorique Française 85. 238-46.
  25. ^ Devereux, P. and Jahn, R (1996). "Preliminary investigations and cognitive considerations of the acoustical resonances of selected archaeological sites." In Antiquity 70. 665-6.
  26. ^ Watson, A. and Keating. D. (1999). "Architecture and sound: an acoustic analysis of megalithic monuments in prehistoric Britain." In Antiquity 73. 325-36.
  27. ^ Scott, R. and Phillips, T. (1998). "Archaeological experiment at Balnuaran of Clava North Eastern cairn on 20th and 22nd December 1997." In Sites and Monuments Archive: <http://her.highland.gov.uk/hbsmrgatewayhighland/DataFiles/LibraryLinkFiles/37677.pdf >
  28. ^ Temple, R. (2000). The Crystal Sun: The Most Secret Science of the Ancient World. Nyu-York: tasodifiy uy.
  29. ^ Saletta, M. (2011). "The Archaeoastronomy of the Megalithic Monuments of Arles-Fontvieille: The Equinox, the Pleiades and Orion." In Proceedings of the International Astronomical Union 7. 364-73.
  30. ^ Watson, A. and Scott, R. (2016). "Materialising Light, Making Worlds: Optical Image Projection within the Megalithic Passage Tombs of Britain and Ireland." In Papadopoulos. C. and Moyes, H., eds., The Oxford Handbook of Light in Archaeology. Oksford: Oksford universiteti matbuoti.
  31. ^ Watson, A. and Scott, R. (2016). "Materialising Light, Making Worlds: Optical Image Projection within the Megalithic Passage Tombs of Britain and Ireland." In Papadopoulos. C. and Moyes, H., eds., The Oxford Handbook of Light in Archaeology. Oksford: Oksford universiteti matbuoti.
  32. ^ Leakey, M.D. (1971). Olduvai Gorge, Volume 3: Excavations in beds I & II 1960–1963. Nyu-York: Kembrij universiteti matbuoti. 24.
  33. ^ Chavaillon, J. (2004). "The site of Gomboré I: Discovery, geological introduction and study of percussion material and tools on pebble." In Studies on the early Paleolithic site of Melka Konturé, Ethiopia. (Chavaillon, J. and Piperno, M., eds.) Origines. Istituto Italiano di Preistoria e Protoistoria: Firenze. 263
  34. ^ Chavaillon, J. (2004). "The site of Gomboré I: Discovery, geological introduction and study of percussion material and tools on pebble." In Studies on the early Palaeolithic site of Melka Konturé, Ethiopia. (Chavaillon, J. and Piperno, M., eds.) Origines. Istituto Italiano di Preistoria e Protoistoria: Firenze. 263
  35. ^ Giusberti, G., Guerreschi, A., and Peretto, C. (1983). "Le strutture d’abitato dell’accampamento Paleolitico di Isernia La Pineta: Prime considerazioni." In Isernia La Pineta: Un accampamento più antico di 700.000 anni. Calderini: Bologna. 100.
  36. ^ Fang, Y., Huang, Y., and Shen, C. (2004). "Pebble semicircle structure from a Lower Palaeolithic site in Southern China." In Eurasian Prehistory 2(2). 3-12.
  37. ^ Mania D. and Mania U., (2005). "The natural and socio-cultural environment of Homo erectus at Bilzingsleben, Germany." In Gamble and Porr (eds.) The Hominid Individual in Context: Archaeological investigations of Lower and Middle Palaeolithic landscapes, locales, and artefacts. Nyu-York: Routledge. 98-114.
  38. ^ de Lumley, H. (1966). "Les fouilles de Terra Amata à Nice: Premier résultats." In Bulletin du Musée d’Anthropologie Préhistorique de Monaco 13. 29-51; de Lumley, H. (1969). "A Palaeolithic camp at Nice." In Scientific American 22, No. 5. 33-41.
  39. ^ Michel, D. (1982). "Le gisement préhistorique de Port Pignot à Fermanville (Manche)." In Gallia Préhistoire, Vol. 25, Issue 1. 1-68; Michel, D. (1983). "Structures d’habitat du paléolithique inférieur du Nord Cotentin." In Bulletin de la Société Normande d’Etudes Préhistoriques et Historiques, XLVIII. 11-13.
  40. ^ Fosse, G. (1981). "Le site moustérien de Saint-Vaast-la-Hougue (Manche): Premiers résultats at problématiques generals." In Gallia Préhistoire 24, 2. 383-386.
  41. ^ de Lumley, H. (1969). "Une Cabane Acheuléenne dans la Grotte du Lazaret (Nice)." In Mémoires de la Société Préhistorique Française, vol. 7 Paris.
  42. ^ de Lumley, H. (1957). "Le Moustérien de la Baume des Peyrards (Vaucluse): Note Préliminaire." In Bulletin de la Société d’Etude des Sciences naturelles de Vaucluse. 1-23.de Lumley, H. (1962). "Paléolithique ancien et moyen en Vaucluse: notes préliminaires (1957-1962)." In Bulletin de la Société d’Etude des Sciences naturelles de Vaucluse. 29-79.
  43. ^ Mellars, P. (1995). The Neanderthal legacy: An archaeological perspective from Western Europe . Prinston: Prinston universiteti matbuoti. 292-308.
  44. ^ Gouédo, J-M., Bats, J-C., Krier, V., Pernot, P., and Ricard, J-L. (1994). "Le Gisement Moustérien de la ‘Butte d’Arvigny’ Commune de Moissy-Cramayel (Seine-et-Marne): Premiers Résultats." In Bulletin de la Société Préhistorique Française, Vol. 91, Issue 6. 369-377.
  45. ^ Bourguignon, L., Sellami, F., Deloze, V., Sellier-Segard, N., Beyries, S., and Emery-Barbier, A. (2012). "L’habitat moustérien de « La Folie » (Poitiers, Vienne): synthèse des premiers résultats." In Paleo: Revue d’archéologie Préhistorique vol 14. 29-48.
  46. ^ Peyrony, D. (1934) "La Ferrassie" in Préhistoire III. Parij. 1-92.
  47. ^ Cyrek, K. (2003). "Biśnik Cave: A reconstruction of the site’s occupation in the context of environmental changes." In Eurasian Prehistory 1(1). 5-29.
  48. ^ Zilhão, J. (2001). "Middle Palaeolithic Settlement Patterns in Portugal." In Settlement Dynamics of the Middle Palaeolithic and Middle Stone Age (Nicholas Conard, ed.) Tübingen: Kerns Verlag. 597-608.
  49. ^ Păunescu, A. (1965). "Sur la succession des habitats paléolithiques et post-paléolithiques de Ripiceni Izvor." In Dacia N.S. 9. 5–31.
  50. ^ Demay, L., Péan, S., and Patou-Mathis, M. (2012). "Mammoths used as food and building resources by Neanderthals: Zooarchaeological study applied to layer 4, Molodova I (Ukraine)." In Quaternary International vol. 276-277. 212-226.
  51. ^ Sinitsyn, A. (2007). "Variabilité du Gravettien de Kostienki (Bassin moyen du Don) et des territoires associés." In Paléo, 19. 181-201; Hoffecker, J., Holliday, V., Anikovich, M.V., Sinitsyn, A.A. and Popov, V.V. (2009). Early Palaeolithic Settlement at Kostenki, Russia. A Research Report to the National Geographic Society: Grant 8528-08.
  52. ^ Freeman, L.G. and González Echegaray, J. (1970). "Aurignacian Structural Features and Burials at Cueva Morín (Santander, Spain)." In Nature, 226. 722-726.
  53. ^ Freeman, L.G. and González Echegaray, J. (1970). "Aurignacian Structural Features and Burials at Cueva Morín (Santander, Spain)." In Nature, 226. 722-726.
  54. ^ Combier, J. (1988). "L’Organisation de l’espace habité des hommes du Paléolithique Supérieur en France." In Espacio, Tiempo y Forma, Serie I, Number I, Prehistoria y Arqueología. 111-124.; Digan, M. (2008). "New technological and economic data from La Vigne-Brun (unit KL19), Loire: a contribution to the identification of early Gravettian lithic technological expertise." In Quartär 55. 115-125.
  55. ^ Martin Oliva, M. (2014). "Dolní Věstonice (1922-1942): Karel Absolon, Hans Freising, and Assien Bohmers." In Anthropos-Studies, Vol. 37 N.S. 29 (2014).
  56. ^ Allard, M. (2006). "25.000 years old architecture: Habitat 22 of Les Peyrugues" (C67-16) presented in Session 67 ‘Settlement dynamics and environment resources in the Palaeolithic of Southwest France: The case of the Quercy region’ at the XV Congress of the International Union for Prehistoric and Protohistoric Sciences, Lisbon, (4–9 September 2006); Allard, M. (1993). "Remontage lithique exceptionnel dans le Solutréen inférieur des Peyrugues (Orniac, Lot)." In Paléo, Vol. 5, Issue 5. 179-191.
  57. ^ Allard, M. (2006). "25.000 years old architecture: Habitat 22 of Les Peyrugues" (C67-16) presented in Session 67 ‘Settlement dynamics and environment resources in the Palaeolithic of Southwest France: The case of the Quercy region’ at the XV Congress of the International Union for Prehistoric and Protohistoric Sciences, Lisbon, (4–9 September 2006). Allard, M. (1993). "Remontage lithique exceptionnel dans le Solutréen inférieur des Peyrugues (Orniac, Lot)." In Paléo, Vol. 5, Issue 5. 179-191.
  58. ^ Nadel, D., Weiss, E., Simchoni, O., Tsatskin, A., Danin, A., and Kislev, M. (2004). "Stone age hut in Israel yields world’s oldest evidence of bedding." In Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (USA) vol. 101 yo'q. 17. 6821- 6826
  59. ^ Gerasimov, M.M. (1935). "Raskopi Paleoliticheskoi Stoianki Mal’ta." in Paleolit SSSR. Moskva.
  60. ^ Gerasimov, M.M. (1935). "Raskopi Paleoliticheskoi Stoianki Mal’ta." in Paleolit SSSR. Moskva.
  61. ^ Gaussen, J. (1994). "Le Plateau Parrain: l’orginisation." In L’Anthropologie 98 (2-3). 418-426.
  62. ^ Iakovleva, L., Djindjian, F., Maschenko, E.N., Konik, S., Moigne, A.-M. (2012). "The late Upper Palaeolithic site of Gontsy (Ukraine): A reference for the reconstruction of the hunter-gatherer system based on a mammoth economy." In Quaternary International 255. 86-93.
  63. ^ Soffer, O., Adovasio, J., Kornietz, N., Velichko, A., Gribchenko, Y., Lenz, B., and Suntsov, V. (1997). "Cultural Stratigraphy at Mezhirich, an Upper Palaeolithic Site in Ukraine with Multiple Occupations" in Antiquity 71. 48-62. Svoboda, J., Péan, S., and Wojtal, P. (2005). "Mammoth Bone Deposits and Subsistence Practices during Mid-Upper Palaeolithic in Central Europe: Three cases from Moravia and Poland." In Quaternary International 126–128. 209-221.Gladkikh, M.I., Kornietz, N.L., and Soffer, O. (1984). "Mammoth Bone Dwellings on the Russian Plain." In Scientific American (November, 1984). 164-75.
  64. ^ Bosinski, G. (2008). Tierdarstellungen von Gönnersdorf: Nachträge zu Mammut und Pferd sowie die übrigen Tierdarstellungen, Der Magdalénien-Fundplatz Gönnersdorf Volume 9. Mainz: RGZM.Bosinski, G., d'Errico, F., and Schiller, P. (2001). Die gravierten Frauendarstellungen von Gönnersdorf, Der Magdalénien-Fundplatz Gönnersdorf Volume 8. Stuttgart: Steiner.Franken, E. and Veil, S. (1983). Die Steinartefakte von Gönnersdorf, Der Magdalénien-Fundplatz Gönnersdorf Volume 7. Wiesbaden: Steiner.Terberger, T. (1997). Die Siedlungsbefunde von Gönnersdorf: Konzentrationen III und IV, Der Magdalénien-Fundplatz Gönnersdorf Volume 6. Wiesbaden: Steiner.Bosinski, G. and Fischer, G. (1980). Mammut- und Pferdedarstellungen von Gönnersdorf, Der Magdalénien-Fundplatz Gönnersdorf Volume 5. Weisbaden: Steiner, 1980.Brunnacker, K. (1978). Geowissenschaftliche Untersuchungen in Gönnersdorf, Der Magdalénien-Fundplatz Gönnersdorf Volume 4. Weisbaden: Steiner.Bosinski, G. (1978) Die Ausgrabungen in Gönnersdorf 1968-1976 und die Siedlungsbefunde der Grabung 1968, Der Magdalénien-Fundplatz Gönnersdorf Volume 3. Weisbaden: Steiner.F. Poplin, F. (1976). Les grands vertébrés de Gönnersdorf, Fouilles 1968, Der Magdalénien-Fundplatz Gönnersdorf Volume 2. Wiesbaden: Steiner.Bosinski, G. and Fischer, G. (1974). Die Menschendarstellungen von Gönnersdorf der Ausgrabung von 1968, Der Magdalénien-Fundplatz Gönnersdorf Volume 1. Wiesbaden: Steiner.
  65. ^ Leroi-Gourhan, A. (1984). Pincevent: Campement magdalénien de chasseurs de rennes. Guides Archeologiques de la France: L'Imprimerie Nationale.Leroi-Gourhan, A. and Brézillon, M. (1972). "Fouilles de Pincevent: Essai d’analyse ethnographique d’un habitat magdalénien (la section 36)." In Gallia Préhistoire, supplement VIIè.Leroi-Gourhan, A. and Brézillon, M. (1966). "L'habitation magdalénienne n° 1 de Pincevent près Monterau (Seine-et-Marne)." In Gallia Préhistoire Vol. 9, Issue 9-2. 263-385. To learn more about the distribution of materials see Enloe, J.G., David, F. and Hare, T. (1994). "Patterns of Faunal Processing at Section 27 of Pincevent: The use of spatial analysis and ethnoarchaeological data in the interpretation of archaeological site structure." In the Journal of Anthropological Archaeology 13. 105-124.
  66. ^ Rust, A. (1962). Vor 20 000 Jahren: Rentierjäger der Eiszeit. Neumünster: Karl Wachholtz Verlag. Fischer, A. and Tauber, H. (1986). "New C-14 Datings of Late Palaeolithic Cultures from Northwestern Europe" in Journal of Danish Archaeology, Vol. 5. 7-13.
  67. ^ Bahn, P.G. (1985). Pyrenean Prehistory: A Palaeoeconomic Survey of the French Sites. Warminster: Aris va Fillips. 336.
  68. ^ Lambert, D. (1987). The Field Guide to Early Man. New York: Diagram Group. 164.
  69. ^ Leesch, D. and Bullinger, J. (2012). "Identifying dwellings in Upper Palaeolithic open-air sites: The Magdalenian site at Monruz (Switzerland) and its contribution to analysing palimpsest." In A Mind Set on Flint: Studies in Honour of Dick Stapert (Niekus, M., Barton, N., Street, M., Terberger, T., eds.) Groningen Archaeological Studies, Vol. 16. Groningen: Barkhuis. 167-168. Leesch and Bullinger also cite Coudret, P., Larrière, M., and Valentine, B. (1989) "Comparer des Foyers: Une entreprise difficile." In Nature et Fonction des Foyers Prehistoriques (M. Olive and Y. Taborin, eds.). Colloque International de Nemours, 12–14 May 1987 (Mémoires du Musée de Préhistoire d’Ile-de-France 2) Association pour la Promotion de la Recherche Archéologique en Ile-de-France, Nemours, 37-45. Valentin, B. (1989). "Nature et Fonction des Foyers de l’habitation n°1 à Pincevent." In Nature et Fonction des Foyers Prehistoriques (M. Olive and Y. Taborin, eds.) Colloque International de Nemours, 12–14 May 1987 (Mémoires du Musée de Préhistoire d’Ile-de-France 2) Association pour la Promotion de la Recherche Archéologique en Ile-de-France, Nemours, 209-219.Valentin, B. and Bodu, P. (1991). "Perspectives de l’expérimentation appliquée à l’étude des foyers paléolithiques: Le cas des foyers del’habitation n°1 à Pincevent (Seine-et-Marne)." In Archéologie Experimentale-2, l’os et la pierre, la Maison et les champs. Colloque International ‘Expérimentation en Archéologie: bilan et perspectives’, Archéodrome de Beaune, 6–9 April 1988. Editions Errance: Paris. 138-145.Leesch, D. (1997). "Hauterive-Champréveyres, 10. Un campement magdalénien au bord du lac de Neuchâtel: cadre chronologique et culturel, mobilier et structures (secteur 1)." In Archéologie Neuchâteloise 19 (Musée Cantonal d’archéologie, Neuchâtel, 1997) 170-172.Plumettaz, N. (2007). "Le site magdalénien de Monruz, 2. Étude des foyers à partir de l’analyse des pierres de leurs remontages." In Archéologie Neuchâteloise 38. Office et Musée Cantonal d’Archéologie Neuchâtel.
  70. ^ Leesch, D., and Bullinger, J. (2012). "Identifying dwellings in Upper Palaeolithic open-air sites: The Magdalenian site at Monruz (Switzerland) and its contribution to analysing palimpsest." In A Mind Set on Flint: Studies in Honour of Dick Stapert (Niekus, M., Barton, N., Street, M., Terberger, T., eds.) Groningen Archaeological Studies, Vol. 16. Groningen: Barkhuis. 168.
  71. ^ Gatton, M. (2005). "Excerpts from — The Camera Obscura and the Origin of Art: The case for image projection in the Palaeolithic, first presented at the University of Louisville." In 6 October 2005.
  72. ^ Gatton, M. and Carreon, L. (2011). "Probability and the Origin of Art: Simulations of the Paleo-camera Theory." In APLIMAT, Journal of Applied Mathematics, Volume 4. 181-190 Gatton, M. and Carreon, L. (2012). "Projecting Projection: A statistical analysis of cast-light images." In Pleistocene Coalition Newsletter #18.
  73. ^ Gatton, M. and Carreon, L. (2011). "Probability and the Origin of Art: Simulations of the Paleo-camera Theory." In APLIMAT, Journal of Applied Mathematics, Volume 4. 185.
  74. ^ Gatton, M. and Carreon, L. (2011). "Probability and the Origin of Art: Simulations of the Paleo-camera Theory." In APLIMAT, Journal of Applied Mathematics, Volume 4. 185.
  75. ^ Davidson, I. and Noble, W. (1989). "The Archaeology of Perception: Traces of Depiction and Language." In Current Anthropology 30. 129.
  76. ^ Lewis-Williams, D. (2002). Mind in the Cave. London: Thames & Hudson, 2002. 184.
  77. ^ Personal correspondence, E-mail from Nigel Spivey to Matt Gatton sent on Monday, 6 March 2006.
  78. ^ Gatton, M., Carreon, L., Cawein, M., Brock, W., and Scott, V. (2010). "The Camera Obscura and the Origin of Art: The case for image projection in the Palaeolithic." In the Official Proceedings of the XV World Congress of the Union Internationale des Sciences Préhistoriques et Protohistoriques (UISPP) 35, Lisbon 2006, Global State of the Art--SO7 (Kumar, G. and Bednarik, R., eds.) Oxford: Archaeopress. 138.
  79. ^ Gatton, M. "First Light: Inside the Palaeolithic camera obscura" in Acts of Seeing: Artists, Scientists and the History of the Visual -- a volume dedicated to Martin Kemp (Kaniari, A. and Wallace, M., eds.) London: Zidane. 153.
  80. ^ Otto, R. (1950 ed.). Muqaddas g'oya; an inquiry into the non-rational factor in the idea of the divine and its relation to the rational [Harvey, J.W., trans.]. New York: Oxford University Press, 1950 ed. Originally published in German as Das Heilige (1917).
  81. ^ Gatton, M. (2010). “Paleo-camera and the Concept of Representation." In Pleistocene Coalition News, Vol. 2: Issue 3 (Feliks, J., ed.) May–June. 5.
  82. ^ Gatton, M. (2010). "Paleo-camera and the Concept of Representation." In Pleistocene Coalition News, Vol. 2: Issue 3 (Feliks, J., ed.) May–June. 5.
  83. ^ Gatton, M. (2009). “First Light: Inside the Palaeolithic camera obscura.” In Acts of Seeing: Artists, Scientists and the History of the Visual -- a volume dedicated to Martin Kemp (Kaniari, A. and Wallace, M., eds.) London: Zidane. 153.
  84. ^ Gatton, M. (2010). “The Camera and the Cave: Understanding the style of Palaeolithic art.” In Pleistocene Coalition News, Vol. 2: Issue 5 (Feliks, J., ed.) September–October.Gatton, M. (2010). “Paleo-camera, Phase II: Projected images in art and ritual (or why European Upper Palaeolithic art looks the way it does).” In Pleistocene Coalition News, Vol. 2: Issue 4 (Feliks, J., ed.) July–August.
  85. ^ Gatton, M. (2009). “First Light: Inside the Palaeolithic camera obscura.” In Acts of Seeing: Artists, Scientists and the History of the Visual -- a volume dedicated to Martin Kemp (Kaniari, A. and Wallace, M., eds.) London: Zidane. 151.
  86. ^ Gatton, M. (2005). “Drawing experiments” in “Excerpts from — The Camera Obscura and the Origin of Art: The case for image projection in the Palaeolithic, first presented at the University of Louisville.” In May 2005.
  87. ^ https://www.pbs.org/howartmadetheworld/interviews/
  88. ^ Television coverage: De Prehistorie van Het Beeld, Vlaamse Radio- en Televisieomroeporganisatie (VRT). (Feb. 13, 2014).<http://cobra.canvas.be/cm/cobra/videozone/rubriek/kunst-videozone/1.1874453 > Radio coverage: Radio 1, Helena De Groot and Marc de Bie<http://www.radio1.be/programmas/bar-du-matin/artefact-de-prehistorie-van-het-beeld[doimiy o'lik havola ]>
  89. ^ O’Kelly, M. (1982). Newgrange. Archaeology, Art and Legend. London: Temza va Xadson. 117-8.
  90. ^ Eogan, G. (1986). Knowth and the passage tombs of Ireland. London: Temza va Xadson. 24-5.
  91. ^ Nualláin, S.Ó. (1979). "The Megalithic Tombs of Ireland" in Expedition 21, no. 3, University of Pennsylvania. 11. See also Møder med Danmarks oldtid (2011) (exhibition). National Museet, Copenhagen.
  92. ^ Henshall, A.S. and Ritchie, J.N.G. (2001). The Chambered Cairns of the Central Highlands. Edinburg: Edinburg universiteti matbuoti. 98.
  93. ^ Davidson, J.L. and Henshall, A.S. (1991). The Chambered Cairns of Caithness. Edinburg: Edinburg universiteti matbuoti. 83-4.
  94. ^ Bradley, R. (2000). The Good Stones: A new investigation of the Clava Cairns. Edinburgh: Society of Antiquaries of Scotland Monograph 17. 160.
  95. ^ Bredli. R. (1998). "Architecture, Imagination and the Neolithic world." In Creativity in Human Evolution and Prehistory, (Mithen, S., ed.). London: Routledge. 227-240.
  96. ^ Hingley, R. (1996). "Ancestors and identity in the later prehistory of Atlantic Scotland: the reuse and reinvention of Neolithic monuments and material culture." In World Archaeology 28. 231-43.
  97. ^ O’Kelly, M. (1982). Newgrange. Archaeology, Art and Legend. London, Temza va Xadson.
  98. ^ Eogan, G. (1986). Knowth and the passage tombs of Ireland. London: Temza va Xadson.
  99. ^ Davidson, J.L. and Henshall, A.S. (1989). The Chambered Cairns of Orkney. Edinburg: Edinburg universiteti matbuoti. 62-3.
  100. ^ Burl, A. (1999). Circles of Stone: The Prehistoric Rings of Britain and Ireland. London: Harvill Press. 9-11.
  101. ^ O’Kelly, M. (1982). Newgrange: Archaeology, art and legend. London: Temza va Xadson. 45.
  102. ^ Davidson, J.L. and Henshall, A.S. (1989). The Chambered Cairns of Orkney. Edinburg: Edinburg universiteti matbuoti. 154.
  103. ^ Davidson, J.L. and Henshall, A.S. (1989). The Chambered Cairns of Orkney. Edinburg: Edinburg universiteti matbuoti. 59.
  104. ^ Eogan, G. (1986). Knowth and the passage tombs of Ireland. London: Temza va Xadson.
  105. ^ Jones, A. (2004). "By Way of Illustration: Art, Memory and Materiality in the Irish Sea and Beyond." In The Neolithic of the Irish Sea: Materiality and Traditions of Practice, (Cummings, V. and Fowler, C., eds.) Oxford: Oxbow. 202-13.
  106. ^ Gatton, M. (2010). "Excerpts from — The Camera Obscura and the Megalithic Tomb: The role of projected solar images in the symbolic renewal of Life." In 9 March 2010.
  107. ^ Watson, A. and Scott, R. (2016). "Materialising Light, Making Worlds: Optical Image Projection within the Megalithic Passage Tombs of Britain and Ireland." In The Oxford Handbook of Light in Archaeology (Papadopoulos, C. and Moyes, H. eds.) Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  108. ^ Saletta, M. (2011). "The Archaeoastronomy of the Megalithic Monuments of Arles-Fontvieille: The Equinox, the Pleiades and Orion." In Proceedings of the International Astronomical Union 7. 370-1.
  109. ^ O’Kelly, M. (1982). Newgrange: Archaeology, art and legend. London: Temza va Xadson. 96.
  110. ^ Davidson, J.L. and Henshall, A.S. (1989). The Chambered Cairns of Orkney. Edinburg: Edinburg universiteti matbuoti. 51.
  111. ^ Ruggles, C. (1999). Astronomy in Prehistoric Britain and Ireland. London: Yel universiteti matbuoti. 129.
  112. ^ Gatton, M. (2010). "Palaeo-camera and the Concept of Representation." In Pleistocene Coalition News 2 (3). 5.
  113. ^ Gatton, M., Carreon, L., Cawein, M., Brock, W. and Scott, V. (2010). "The Camera Obscura and the Origin of Art: The Case for Image Projection in the Palaeolithic." In Proceedings of the XV World Congress of the Union Internationale des Sciences Préhistoriques et Protohistoriques (UISPP) 35, Global State of the Art (SO7), BAR S2108, (Kumar, G. and Bednarik, R., eds.) 135-41. Oksford: Archaeopress.
  114. ^ Watson, A. (2016). "Archaeo-optics and image projection in the Neolithic." In .
  115. ^ Watson, A. (2016). "Archaeo-optics and image projection in the Neolithic." In .
  116. ^ Watson, A. and Scott, R. (2016). "Materialising Light, Making Worlds: Optical Image Projection within the Megalithic Passage Tombs of Britain and Ireland." In The Oxford Handbook of Light in Archaeology (Papadopoulos, C. and Moyes, H. eds.) Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  117. ^ Gatton, M. (2010). "Excerpts from — The Camera Obscura and the Megalithic Tomb: The role of projected solar images in the symbolic renewal of life." In 9 March 2010.
  118. ^ Saletta, M. (2011). "The Archaeoastronomy of the Megalithic Monuments of Arles-Fontvieille: The Equinox, the Pleiades and Orion." In Proceedings of the International Astronomical Union 7. 370-1.
  119. ^ Watson, A. and Scott, R. (2016). "Materialising Light, Making Worlds: Optical Image Projection within the Megalithic Passage Tombs of Britain and Ireland." In The Oxford Handbook of Light in Archaeology (Papadopoulos, C. and Moyes, H., eds.) Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  120. ^ Gatton, M. (2010). "Excerpts from — The Camera Obscura and the Megalithic Tomb: The role of projected solar images in the symbolic renewal of life." In 9 March 2010.
  121. ^ See Bradley, R. (2000). The Good Stones: A New Investigation of the Clava Cairns. Edinburgh: Society of Antiquaries of Scotland Monograph 17.
  122. ^ Scott, R. and Phillips, T. (1999). "Clava: Light at the End of the Tunnel." In Current Archaeology 165. 332-335.
  123. ^ Watson, A. and Scott, R. (2016). "Materialising Light, Making Worlds: Optical Image Projection within the Megalithic Passage Tombs of Britain and Ireland." In The Oxford Handbook of Light in Archaeology (Papadopoulos, C. and Moyes, H., eds.) Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  124. ^ Watson, A. (2016). "Archaeo-optics and image projection in the Neolithic." In .
  125. ^ Gatton, M. (2010). "Excerpts from — The Camera Obscura and the Megalithic Tomb: The role of projected solar images in the symbolic renewal of Life." In 9 March 2010.
  126. ^ Watson, A. and Scott, R. (2016). "Materialising Light, Making Worlds: Optical Image Projection within the Megalithic Passage Tombs of Britain and Ireland." In The Oxford Handbook of Light in Archaeology (Papadopoulos, C. and Moyes, H., eds.) Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  127. ^ Watson, A. and Scott, R. (2016). "Materialising Light, Making Worlds: Optical Image Projection within the Megalithic Passage Tombs of Britain and Ireland." In The Oxford Handbook of Light in Archaeology (Papadopoulos, C. and Moyes, H., eds.) Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  128. ^ Thomas, J. (1992). "Monuments, Movement and the Context of Megalithic Art." In Vessels for the Ancestors, (Sharples, N. and Sheridan, A., Eds.) Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press. 62-76.
  129. ^ Watson, A. and Scott, R. (2016). "Materialising Light, Making Worlds: Optical Image Projection within the Megalithic Passage Tombs of Britain and Ireland." In The Oxford Handbook of Light in Archaeology (Papadopoulos, C. and Moyes, H., eds.) Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  130. ^ Saletta, M. (2011). "The Archaeoastronomy of the Megalithic Monuments of Arles-Fontvieille: The Equinox, the Pleiades and Orion." In Proceedings of the International Astronomical Union 7. 371.
  131. ^ Watson, A. (2001). "Transformatsiya tovushlari: ingliz neolitida akustika, yodgorliklar va marosim". "Shamanism arxeologiyasi" kitobida, (Narx, N., tahr.) London: Routledge. 178-92.
  132. ^ Lehner, M. (1997). To'liq piramidalar: qadimiy sirlarni echish. London: Temza va Xadson. 20. Quyoshning tirilish jarayoni qanday ketayotgani haqida tushuntirish uchun 30-betga qarang.
  133. ^ Xornung, E. (1999). Axenaten va nur dini [Devid Lorton, tarjima] Ithaca: Cornell University Press. 19.
  134. ^ Gatton, M. (2010). "Parchalar - Amin-Ra nuri: Fir'avnning marosimlarini yangilashda prognoz qilingan tasvirlarning asosiy roli." da 9 mart 2010 yil.
  135. ^ Gatton, M. (2010). "Parchalar - Amin-Ra nuri: Fir'avnning marosimlarini yangilashda prognoz qilingan tasvirlarning asosiy roli." da 9 mart 2010 yil.
  136. ^ Gatton, M. (2016). "Eleusinian Projektor: Ierofantning ma'buda bilan bog'liq bo'lgan optik usuli." Arxeologiyada yorug'lik bo'yicha Oksford qo'llanmasida (Papadopulos, C. and Moyes, H., eds.). Oksford: Oksford universiteti matbuoti.
  137. ^ Gatton, M. (2016). "Eleusinian Proyektori: Ierofantning ma'buda bilan bog'liq bo'lgan optik usuli." Arxeologiyada yorug'lik bo'yicha Oksford qo'llanmasida (Papadopulos, C. and Moyes, H., eds.). Oksford: Oksford universiteti matbuoti.