Jamiyat tanlovini birlashtirish - Community Choice Aggregation

Jamiyat tanlovini birlashtirish (CCA), shuningdek, nomi bilan tanilgan Jamiyat tanlovi energiyasi, shahar birlashmasi, hukumat yig'ilishi, elektr energiyasini yig'ishva jamoaviy birlashma, investitsiyalarga tegishli bo'lgan kommunal energiya ta'minoti tizimiga alternativa bo'lib, Qo'shma Shtatlardagi mahalliy tashkilotlar muqobil energiya ta'minoti shartnomalarini ta'minlash uchun belgilangan yurisdiktsiya doirasida individual xaridorlarning sotib olish qobiliyatini to'playdilar.[1] CCA iste'molchilar nomidan energiya ishlab chiqarish manbasini tanlaydi.

Quvvat uzatish

Sotib olish qobiliyatini jamlab, ular generatorlar bilan katta shartnomalar tuzishga qodir, buni individual xaridorlar qila olmaydi. CCA-larning asosiy maqsadlari iste'molchilar uchun xarajatlarni pasaytirish yoki iste'molchilarga energiya aralashmasi ustidan ko'proq nazorat qilish imkoniyatini berish, asosan mahalliy kommunal xizmatlarga qaraganda "yashil" avlod portfellarini taklif qilishdir. Qo'shma Shtatlarning sakkiz shtati CCA qonunini qabul qildi. Ular: Massachusets shtati, Ogayo shtati, Kaliforniya, Illinoys, Nyu-Jersi, Nyu York, Rod-Aylend va Virjiniya. Umuman olganda, ular 2014 yilga kelib 1300 dan ortiq munitsipalitetdagi 5% amerikaliklarga xizmat ko'rsatadilar.[2]

Elektr energiyasini taqsimlashda CCA qanday ishlaydi

1-rasm: CCAlarning kommunal xizmatlar va iste'molchilar bilan o'zaro aloqasi[3]

CCAlar elektr energiyasini ishlab chiqarish uchun energiya manbalari to'g'risida qaror qabul qilish rolini o'z zimmalariga olgan, nodavlat notijorat tashkilotlari. O'rnatilgandan so'ng, CCA'lar standart xizmat ko'rsatuvchi provayderga aylanadi quvvat aralashmasi mijozlarga etkazib berildi. CCA xizmat ko'rsatish hududida amaldagi kommunal uzatish va tarqatish infratuzilmasiga, hisoblagichga va hisob-kitoblarga egalik qiladi va saqlaydi.[4] CCA tashabbuskori bo'lgan munitsipalitet, odatda mahalliy saylangan mansabdor shaxslardan iborat bo'lgan boshqaruv kengashini tuzadi, ular xaridlar, narxlar va qanday mahalliy energiya dasturlarini moliyalashtirish to'g'risida asosiy qarorlarni qabul qiladi. [5]

Qayta tiklanadigan energiya ahamiyati

Shamol kuchi

CCAlar elektr energiyasi uchun to'lovlarni kamaytirish bilan bir qatorda yashil energiya va iqlimni muhofaza qilish bo'yicha milliy rekordlarni o'rnatdilar Qayta tiklanadigan energiya milliy laboratoriyasi (NREL) va Atrof muhitni muhofaza qilish agentligi (EPA) sezilarli darajada yuqori natijalarga erishish uchun tan olinishi qayta tiklanadigan energiya odatdagi fotoalbom va yadroga asoslangan kommunal energiya bilan raqobatdosh stavkalarni saqlab turganda portfellar. AQShning CCA tasarrufidagi bir nechta yirik aholi punktlari mahalliy kommunal xizmatlar yoki boshqa to'g'ridan-to'g'ri kirish provayderlariga qaraganda kattaroq darajadagi energiya portfellariga o'tdilar, ammo kommunal xizmatlar yoki to'g'ridan-to'g'ri kirish stavkalari bo'yicha hech qanday haq to'lamaydilar. Shuning uchun CCAlar qayta tiklanadigan energetikada erishgan yutuqlari uchun AQSh atrof-muhitni muhofaza qilish agentligining "yashil energiya etakchisi mukofotlari" ga sazovor bo'lgan "yashil energiya" innovatsiyalarining etakchilari hisoblanadi (MCE Clean Energy; Oak Park, IL, Cincinnati, OH). 2019 yilga kelib Sonoma Clean Power 91% uglerodsiz quvvat bilan ta'minladi va o'zining EverGreen Servis xizmatiga 2000 mijozni qabul qildi va mahalliy quyosh panellari va geotermik stansiyalardan 100% qayta tiklanadigan energiya bilan ta'minladi. Bundan tashqari, Petaluma hududida oltita quyosh stansiyalariga egalik qilishni va boshqarishni rejalashtirmoqda.[6]

Mamlakat bo'ylab CCA-larning atigi 13% "yashil energiya" ni taklif qiladi, chunki ularning asosiy maqsadi mijozlarga elektr energiyasi xarajatlarini kamaytirishdir. Kaliforniya CCAlari qayta tiklanadigan elektr energiyasini taklif qilishda etakchilik qilmoqda, chunki ular davlat qonunchiligida shunday talab qilinadi. Biroq, Kaliforniyadagi CCAlar qayta tiklanadigan energiyani ixtiyoriy ravishda qayta tiklanadigan portfel standarti (RPS) talablaridan yuqori darajada sotib olishadi. UCLA Luskin Innovatsiyalar Markazining ma'lumotlariga ko'ra, 2011-2018 yillarda Kaliforniyadagi CCA'lar to'g'ridan-to'g'ri 24 teravatt-soat (TWh) elektr energiyasini sotib olishdi, shundan 11 TVt / soat ixtiyoriy yoki RPSga mos keladi. [7] Bundan tashqari, AQShda 100% toza energiya bilan ishlaydigan 72 ta shahar va tumanning 64 tasi Kaliforniyada va CCA a'zosi. [8] Nyu-York shtatida yagona CCA sotuvlarining taxminan 50% yashil rangga ega. Illinoys, Mass va Ogayo shtatlaridagi qo'shimcha 90 ta CCA qayta tiklanadigan energiya bilan ta'minlaydi; ammo aksariyat CCA'lar ixtiyoriy ravishda qayta tiklanadigan energiyani standart energiya mahsuloti sifatida taklif qilmaydi.[9]

CCA uchun siyosat asoslari

AQShda CCA sakkizta shtatda: Massachusets, Ogayo, Kaliforniya, Illinoys, Nyu-Jersi, Nyu-York, Rod-Aylend va Virjiniyada ruxsat etiladi. Shtatlar avval agentlik tuzilishidan oldin CCAni shakllantirishga imkon beradigan qonunchilikni qabul qilishlari kerak. Hozircha faqat tartibga solinmagan davlatlar (qarang elektrni tartibga solish ) CCA qonunchiligini qabul qildilar.[10] Bu tabiiy o'sishdir, chunki elektr energiyasini tartibga solish elektr energiyasini ishlab chiqarish va tarqatishdan iste'molchilarga elektr energiyasini ishlab chiqaruvchisini tanlashga imkon beradigan funktsiyalarni ajratadi. Keyinchalik, bu ajratish CCA-larga elektr energiyasini ko'chirish uchun infratuzilmani yaratmasdan iste'molchilar nomidan elektr energiyasini ishlab chiqarish aralashmasini tanlashga imkon beradi. Biroq, faqat 17 ta shtat va Kolumbiya okrugi tartibga solinmagan bozorlarga ega.[11] Qolgan 33 ta davlat tartibga solingan deb hisoblanadi, bu erda kommunal xizmatlar elektr energiyasini ishlab chiqarish, uzatish va taqsimlash bo'yicha monopoliyani saqlab qoladi.[11]

Jamiyat tanlovini birlashtirish uchun qonuniy avtorizatsiya[12]
ShtatYilVakolatli qonunchilikQonun hujjatlari nomini avtorizatsiya qilish
Massachusets shtati1997M.G.L. ch.93A §11997 yilda kommunal xizmatlarni qayta qurish to'g'risidagi qonun
Ogayo shtati2001Mahalliy byulleten o'lchoviYo'q
Kaliforniya2002117-moddaElektrni qayta qurish: yig'ish
Illinoys2002 yil (turar joy)220 ILCS 5 / Art. XVIElektr xizmati mijozlarining tanlovi va tariflarni engillashtirish to'g'risidagi 1997 yilgi qonun
Nyu-Jersi2003Assambleya to'g'risidagi qonun 21652003 yilgi hukumatning energiya yig'ilishi to'g'risidagi qonuni
Nyu York2016PSC Case 14-M-0224Jamiyat tanlovini birlashtirishni bekor qilish dasturi uchun avtorizatsiya qilish doirasiga buyurtma bering
Rod-Aylend1996RIPUC № 81241996 yilda kommunal xizmatlarni qayta qurish to'g'risidagi qonun

Dastlabki kunlar

Massachusets shtatida, mamlakatning birinchi CCA loyihasi (Senat 447, Montigny) birinchi bo'lib Massachusets senatining energetika qo'mitasi direktori tomonidan ishlab chiqilgan. Pol Duglas Fen 1995 yilda[13] va 1997 yilda qabul qilingan,[14] ning joylari Cape Cod va Martaning uzumzori tashkil etdi Cape Light Compact va CCA qonunchiligini qabul qilish uchun muvaffaqiyatli lobbichilik qildi. Cape Light Compact asoschilaridan ikkitasi, Falmouth Tanlovchi Metyu Patrik va Barnstable okrugi Komissar Rob O'Liri keyinchalik Massachusets Vakillar Palatasi va Senatga saylandi. 1995-2000 yillarda Fenn Amerikaning mahalliy kuch loyihasini tuzdi va Patrik bilan birgalikda Ogayo, Nyu-Jersi va boshqa shtatlarda shu kabi qonunlarni ishlab chiqish va qabul qilishda ishladi.[15]

Massachusets shtati

Mamlakatdagi birinchi CCA - Cape Light Compact hozirda 200 ming mijozga xizmat qiladi, energiya samaradorligini oshiruvchi va shaffof dasturlarni amalga oshiradi va Cape Cod maktablari, o't o'chirish punktlari va kutubxonalariga quyosh qurilmalarini o'rnatadi.[16]

2019 yil mart oyidan boshlab Massachusets shtatining 150 ga yaqin shahar va shaharchalari jamoatchilik tanlovini birlashtirgan, shu jumladan Boston va Vester.[17][18]

Ogayo shtati

Ogayo shtatida, eng yirik CCA 2000 yilda shtat qonunchilik organi Shimoliy-Sharqiy Ogayo shtati jamoat energetikasi kengashini (NOPEC) tashkil etgan CCA qonunini qabul qilganida,[19] 8 ta okrug va shaharlarda joylashgan 500000 mijozdan iborat bo'lib, elektr energiyasini ishlab chiqarish bo'yicha yoqilg'i ta'minotini ko'mir va atom energiyasi aralashmasidan tabiiy gaz aralashmasiga va qayta tiklanadigan elektr energiyasining ozgina foiziga o'tkazadigan elektr ta'minoti shartnomasini sotib oldi va mintaqaning energiya aralashmasida havo ifloslanishining 70 foizga kamayishini e'lon qildi. Kaliforniya CCA-laridan farqli o'laroq, NOPEC elektr energiyasini (510 ming mijoz) va tabiiy gazni (400 ming mijoz) taklif qiladi.[20] Kengash 14 ta okrugdagi 228 ta jamoaga aylandi.[21]

2020 yilda Ogayo shtatining poytaxti Kolumb 2023 yil boshiga qadar 100% qayta tiklanadigan energiya bilan ta'minlaydigan elektr energiyasini yig'ish rejasini berib, shahar bo'ylab saylov byulletenini tasdiqladi. Uning sotuvchisi AEP Energy, Ogayo shtatida elektr energiyasini etkazib berishga yordam berish uchun yangi shamol va quyosh elektrostansiyalarini qurishni rejalashtirmoqda. .[22]

Kaliforniya

Umumiy nuqtai

2002 yilda Kaliforniya shtati qonun chiqaruvchi qonuni qabul qilindi 117-modda, Kaliforniyada Community Choice Aggregatsiya uchun asos yaratmoqda.[23] Qonun loyihasida ma'lum qilinishicha, mahalliy, notijorat xizmat ko'rsatuvchi provayderlar, ular tomonidan mahalliy saylangan mansabdor shaxslar tomonidan nazorat qilinadi, CCAlar o'zlarining xizmat ko'rsatish hududlarida afzal ko'rilgan xizmat ko'rsatuvchi provayderlardir. Shunday qilib, CCA qonuni mijozlarni avtomatik ravishda o'zlarining mahalliy CCA-lariga ro'yxatdan o'tkazishni talab qildi va istalgan vaqtda o'zlarining amaldagi kommunal xizmatlari bilan "paketli mijoz" bo'lib qolish imkoniyatidan voz kechish imkoniyatiga ega bo'lishlari kerak edi. Shuningdek, qonunda Kaliforniyada CCAlar qonuniy ta'rifi bilan kommunal xizmatlar emasligi va Kaliforniya qonunchiligida qonuniy ravishda notijorat elektr xizmatlari etkazib beruvchilari sifatida belgilanganligi to'g'risida tushuntirishlar berilgan.[2]

AB 117-dan keyin Kaliforniya shtatining kommunal xizmatlar komissiyasida ikki yillik qoidabuzarliklar kuzatildi. 2003 yildan 2005 yilgacha bo'lgan davrda CCAni tartibga solish asoslari ushbu qoidalar tarkibiga kiritilgan:

  • 1-bosqich Qaror: Dekabr 2004 yil: AB 117-qismning jamoatchilik tanlovini birlashtirishga oid qismlarini amalga oshirish[24]
  • 2-bosqich Qarori: 2005 yil 15-dekabr: Jamiyat tanlovi yig'ilishini amalga oshirish bo'yicha 2-bosqich masalalarini hal qilish to'g'risida qaror[25]

Ushbu qoidalarni tuzish jarayoni tugagandan so'ng, CCA 2005 yil oxirida mahalliy hukumatlarga taqdim etildi.

Ning dastlabki kunlarida Kaliforniyadagi energetika inqirozi, Pol Fenn, Massachusets Senatining Energiya qo'mitasi direktori, CCA qonunining huquqiy tadqiqotlarini va loyihalarini ishlab chiqqan, Local Power Inc.ni tashkil etgan va Kaliforniya uchun yangi CCA qonunchiligini ishlab chiqqan.[26] Mahalliy kuch tomonidan uyushtirilgan kampaniyada San-Frantsisko shahri va okrugi Oklend, Berkli, Marin okrugi va bir guruh Los-Anjeles munitsipalitetlari Kaliforniya shtatidagi tartibga solinmagan elektr energiyasi bozorining muvaffaqiyatsizligiga javoban davlat CCA qonunini qabul qilishni so'rab qaror qabul qilishda boshchilik qildilar. Fennning qonun loyihasi 2001 yilda Assambleyaning a'zosi Kerol Migden (D-San-Frantsisko) tomonidan homiylik qilingan va qonun loyihasi (AB117) 2002 yil sentyabr oyida qabul qilingan.[27]

Kaliforniyada CCA tashkil etilishi shtatning investorlarga qarashli kommunal xizmatlari tomonidan dastlabki siyosiy qarshilik tufayli kechiktirildi. 2010 yil iyun oyida, Tinch okeanidagi gaz va elektr energiyasi byulleten tashabbusiga homiylik qildi, 16-taklif, davlat tashkilotlari chakana savdoga kirishlari uchun oddiy ko'pchilik emas, balki saylovchilarning uchdan ikki qismi ovozini talab qilish orqali mahalliy sub'ektlar uchun kommunal xizmatlar yoki CCA tashkil etishni qiyinlashtirish. kuch biznes.[28] Garchi PG&E o'tkazish uchun 46 million dollardan ko'proq mablag 'sarfladi tashabbus Prop 16-ning muxoliflari, oddiy toza energiya faollari, Local Power Inc. va Utility Reform Network boshchiligidagi keng koalitsiya 100 ming dollardan kam mablag 'yig'di va sarfladi,[29][30] 16-taklif mag'lubiyatga uchradi.

San-Frantsisko 2004 yilda Fenn (86-04, Tom Ammiano) tomonidan ishlab chiqilgan CCA Farmonini qabul qildi, u 360 megavatt (MVt) quyosh, yashil taqsimlangan avlod, shamol ishlab chiqarish va energiya samaradorligi va javobni talab qilish dan foydalangan holda San-Frantsisko ratepayers-ga xizmat ko'rsatish quyosh aloqalari.[31] Xususan, ushbu farmon CCA-ning energiya sotib olish vakolatlarini daromad zayomlari bo'yicha vakolatli organ bilan birlashtirgan va Fenn tomonidan ishlab chiqarilgan, H Bond Authority (San-Fransisko Xartiyasi 9.107.8-bo'limi, Ammiano) deb nomlanuvchi CCA kuchini kengaytirish uchun CCA-ga ruxsat berish uchun. qiymati 1 milliard dollarga teng bo'lgan yangi yashil energiya infratuzilmasini moliyalashtirish. 2007 yilda shahar Fenn (Ordinance 447-07, Ammiano va Mirkarimi) tomonidan yozilgan batafsil CCA rejasini qabul qildi, u 2017 yilga kelib San-Fransisko uchun 51% yangilanadigan portfel standartini yaratdi.[32] Keyingi o'n yillikda Sonoma va San-Frantsisko Fennning Local Power Inc kompaniyasi bilan qayta tiklanadigan energiya manbalari va energiya samaradorligini oshirish orqali energiyani lokalizatsiyalashga yo'naltirilgan dastur loyihalari ustida ishladilar.[33]

Iqlimni muhofaza qilish harakatlaridan ilhomlanib, CCA Bay mintaqasi va shtat bo'ylab tarqaldi. 2007 yilda Kaliforniyaning 40 ta mahalliy hukumati CCA-ni o'rganish jarayonida edi, ularning deyarli barchasi shtatdagi uchta investorga tegishli bo'lgan kommunal xizmatlarning yashil energiya darajasini (Renewable Portfolio Standard yoki "RPS) ikki baravar, uch yoki to'rt baravar oshirishga intilishdi. 2020 yil noyabr oyida Kaliforniya bo'ylab 180 dan ortiq shahar va tumanlarda 10 milliondan ortiq xaridorlarning energiya ehtiyojlariga xizmat ko'rsatadigan 23 ta CCA mavjud va 2020-2021 yillarda yangi dasturlarning ishga tushirilishi va mavjud dasturlarning kengayishi bilan ko'proq CCA xizmatiga ega bo'lishi kutilmoqda.[34]

2014 yil aprel oyida Assambleyaning a'zosi Stiv Bredford (D-Gardena) CCAlarning mijozlarni ro'yxatdan o'tkazish imkoniyatlarini keskin cheklaydigan qonunlarni (AB 2145) joriy etdi. CCA himoyachilari va mahalliy hukumatning keng koalitsiyasi, biznes va atrof-muhitni muhofaza qilish tashkiloti oppozitsiyaga ko'tarilib, AB 2145 ni mag'lubiyatga uchratdi.[35] AB 2145 Kaliforniya Assambleyasida o'tgan, ammo 2014 yil 30 avgustda Senatning qonunchilik yig'ilishi ovoz berishga kelmasdan tugaganida Senatda vafot etgan.[36]

Qayta tiklanadigan yangi rivojlanish

Kaliforniyadagi qayta tiklanadigan energiya portfelining standarti (RPS) - bu Kaliforniya shtati tomonidan o'rnatilgan standart, bu shtatdagi elektr ta'minot xizmatlarini etkazib beruvchilar o'zlarining energiya aralashmalariga belgilangan qayta tiklanadigan energiyaning ma'lum minimal darajalarini kiritishni talab qiladi.[37] Kaliforniyada barcha CCAlar ushbu minimal standartlarga javob beradi yoki undan oshadi.[38] (8-betga qarang).

CCAlar mahalliy boshqaruv kengashlari tomonidan tartibga solinadi, ular asosan mahalliy hokimiyat tomonidan saylanadigan mansabdorlardan iborat. Bundan tashqari, CCAlar ularga tegishli bo'lgan davlat va federal qoidalarga rioya qilishlari kerak. Ular ko'plab shtat va federal idoralar, shu jumladan ularning tartibga solish nazorati, Kaliforniya kommunal xizmatlari komissiyasi, shuningdek, Kaliforniya havo resurslari kengashi, Kaliforniya energetika komissiyasi va Federal energiya nazorati komissiyasi bilan aloqada.[39]

CCAlar Kaliforniyada yaxshi tashkil etilgan bo'lib, birinchisi 2010 yilda xizmatni ishga tushirgan. 2020 yil yanvar holatiga ko'ra hozirda 21 ta operatsion CCA mavjud.[40] Kaliforniyada 10 milliondan ortiq mijozlarga xizmat ko'rsatmoqda.[41] CCAlar Kaliforniyadagi quyosh, shamol va bioenergiyani o'z ichiga olgan 3000 megavattdan ortiq yangi qayta tiklanadigan energiya uchun javobgardir.[42] Ular Kaliforniyaning qayta tiklanadigan energiya portfeliga muvofiq qayta tiklanadigan energetikaning shtatdagi asosiy ta'minotchilari.

Quyosh panellari

Kaliforniyadagi barcha CCAlar qayta tiklanadigan energiya manbalari bo'yicha shartnomalar tuzmoqda. 2018 yilda 19 ta Kaliforniya CCA-laridan oltitasida yangi qayta tiklanadigan energiya manbalari bo'yicha elektr energiyasini sotib olish bo'yicha kelishuvlar mavjud bo'lib, bu CCAlarning umumiy yukining taxminan 10% ni va Kaliforniyaning umumiy yukining 1,6% ni qayta tiklanadigan texnologiyalarning barcha turlari uchun o'rtacha 30% quvvat koeffitsientini hisobga olgan holda tashkil etadi.[43]

Quvvat zaryadining befarqligini sozlash

Jamiyat tanlovini yig'ishni rivojlantirish natijasida kelib chiqishi mumkin bo'lgan boshqa masalalar orasida chiqish to'lovlarini ishlab chiqish, xususan Kaliforniya shtatida. Bu Kaliforniya shtatidagi CCAlar uchun muammo, chunki bunga imkon beradi Investorlarga tegishli kommunal xizmat (IOU) Quvvat zaryadining befarqligini sozlash (PCIA) yoki chiqish to'lovi orqali narxlarni ko'tarish,[44][45] mijozlar uchun CCA dasturlariga qo'shilish qimmatroq bo'ladi, chunki mijozlar o'zlarining yordam dasturlari tomonidan taqdim etilgan paketli xizmatlardan foydalanishni to'xtatish va CCA dasturidan foydalanishni boshlashni tanlaganlarida haq olinadi. Odatda 5 yil davomida olinadigan chiqish to'lovi xaridor tomonidan iste'mol qilingan har bir kilovatt-soat elektr energiyasiga nisbatan qo'llaniladi va CCA mijozlarining oylik to'lovlari alohida to'lov sifatida namoyon bo'ladi. Kaliforniyada amaldagi kommunal xizmatda qoladigan mijozlarga ushbu uzoq muddatli xizmatlar uchun o'zlarining adolatli ulushidan ko'proq pul to'lamaganlar uchun chiqish narxini aniqlash qiyin kechdi, bu esa chiqish to'lovlarining tez o'zgarishiga olib keldi. Pacific Gas & Electric kompaniyasining xizmat ko'rsatish zonasidagi chiqish to'lovlari 2012-2013 yillarda 62 foizga kamaydi, faqat 2013-2016 yillarda 211 foizga o'sdi va 2018 yilgi CPUC tartibida yana oshdi.[46] PCIA-ni qayta ko'rib chiqadigan asosiy masalalar dasturning shaffofligi, agentliklarning hisobdorligi va chiqish to'lovlari bilan bog'liq xarajatlarni to'g'ri baholashdir. Chiqish to'lovlari CCA foydalanuvchilariga IOU xizmatlarida qolganlarga sarflanadigan xarajatlarni qoplash uchun to'lanadi.[47]

PCIA, IOU va CCA mijozlari uchun chiqish to'lovlarining qaysi darajasi "adolatli" ekanligi to'g'risidagi siyosat va me'yoriy munozaralar tufayli juda o'zgaruvchan va noaniq bo'lib qoldi. Masalan, PG&E uchun PCIA 2012-2013 yillarda 62% ga kamaydi va 2013-2016 yillarda 211% ga o'sdi.[48]

Chiqish uchun to'lovlar va narxlarni oshirish kabi xarajatlar kamchilik bo'lib qolishi mumkin, chunki CCA mijozlar uchun narxlarni ko'tarishi mumkin. Narxlarni belgilovchilar va mahalliy mansabdor shaxslar CCA narxlarini belgilashlari mumkin, agar mahalliy hokimiyat o'z manfaatlari yo'lida harakat qilsa yoki mahalliy hokimiyat o'z hududlarida CCA va narxlar to'g'risida qaror qabul qilish uchun bilimga ega bo'lmasa.[49]

2018 yil oktyabr oyida, ushbu masala bo'yicha bir yil davomida ish olib borganidan so'ng, CPUC-ning regulyatorlari IOU mijozlari CCA-larga o'tib ketganligi sababli IOU mijozlari ortiqcha energiya xarajatlariga duch kelmasliklarini sug'urta qilish uchun PCIA narxlarini oshirishni davom ettirish va oshirish to'g'risida qarorlarini e'lon qilishdi. CCAlarga jo'nab ketuvchilarning stavkasi PG & E-ni tark etgan mijozlarga nisbatan 1,68% o'sishi kutilgan edi; Kaliforniya shtatidagi Edison defektorlarida 2,5% ga o'sish va SDG & E-dan chiqib ketadigan mijozlarda 5,25%.[50]Rad etish tanlovi xaridor tanlovi uchun foydali bo'lishi mumkin, ammo CCA dasturlari uchun ham xavf tug'dirishi mumkin, chunki agar ko'plab mijozlar xizmatlardan voz kechishni tanlasalar, bu CCA o'rtasida moliyaviy beqarorlikka olib kelishi mumkin.[51]

Energiyani sotib olish va energiya sotuvchilarining roli

Ko'pgina Jamiyat tanlovi yig'uvchilar energiya manbalarini sotib olish va rejalashtirish va energiya xizmatlarini etkazib beruvchilardan kuchlarini ko'pini sotib olish uchun energiya bozorlarida tajribaga ega bo'lgan uchinchi tomon maslahatchilarini yollashadi.[52] yoki mustaqil energiya ishlab chiqaruvchilar. Bu ularning jamoalarining elektr energiyasiga bo'lgan ehtiyojlarini qondirish uchun zarurdir, chunki ko'pgina CCA'lar kredit reytinglariga ega emas yoki past;[53] shuning uchun ular o'zlarining ishlab chiqarish aktivlarini qurishni moliyalashtirishga qodir emaslar.[54] Bu o'zgarib bormoqda; 2019 yilda Moody's Peninsula Clean Energy Authority-ga birinchi marta Baa2 emitentining reytingini tayinladi.[55]

CCA taqdim etishi mumkin bo'lgan afzalliklardan biri bu mahalliy ish joylarini yaratish va mahalliy energiya manbalarini qo'llab-quvvatlashga qaratilgan.[56] Kaliforniyadagi CCAlar elektr energiyasini arzon narxlarda etkazib berish vakolati tufayli zarurat bo'yicha Shell, Calpine Energy Direct Energy va Constellation (Exelonning sho'ba korxonasi) kabi ko'p millatli va yoqilg'iga asoslangan korporatsiyalar bilan shartnoma tuzdilar.

Energiya resurslarining barqarorligi va so'nggi kurortni etkazib beruvchi

2017 yildan boshlab Kaliforniyadagi CCA'lar resurslarning etarliligiga oid ba'zi talablarga ega, ammo amaldagi kommunal oxirgi kurort (POLR) Provayderi bo'lib qolmoqda.[57] Kaliforniyada CCAlar ko'payib borayotganligi sababli, agar CCA ishlamay qolsa, kim POLR javobgarligini o'z zimmasiga olishi haqida munozaralar va xavotirlar mavjud. Ba'zi investorlarga tegishli bo'lgan kommunal xizmatlar elektr energiyasini sotib olish va sotishni to'xtatish istagini bildirishdi va agar hozirgi kommunal xizmatlar endi elektr energiyasini etkazib berish bilan shug'ullanmasa, endi ular ushbu orqaga qaytishni ta'minlashlari mumkin emas.[58] Shaxsiy CCAlar ushbu mas'uliyatni xohlashi yoki o'z zimmasiga olishi mumkinligi bilan farq qiladi.

CPUC "Yashil kitob" nomli tadqiqotni nashr etdi, bu agentlikning 1993 yildagi "Moviy" va "Sariq" kitoblarini eslatadi, bu Kaliforniyani tartibga solish va keyingi 2000-yillarning boshlarida energiya inqiroziga olib keldi. "Yashil kitob" ning mazmuni davlatga qayta tiklanadigan energiya manbalarini maqsadlarini bajarishda va tartibga solinmagan va bo'laklangan energiya ta'minotchilari va etkazib beruvchilarning notinchligidan qochish uchun yordam berish uchun puxta va har tomonlama energiya rejalashtirishga chaqirishdan iborat.[59]

Kaliforniya shtatining energetika siyosatining uchta ustuniga tahdid soladigan muhim tendentsiyalar mavjud: ishonchlilik, arzonlik va chuqur dekarbonizatsiya. Birinchi tendentsiya parchalangan qarorlarni qabul qilish bilan bog'liq. 2017 yilda to'qqizta CCA iste'molchilarga energiya etkazib berdi; bugun 21 ta. 2020-yillarning o'rtalariga kelib Kaliforniyadagi 85 foiz quvvatni 2019 yilda elektr energiyasini etkazib beruvchilardan farq qiladigan yangi tashkilotlar ta'minlashi mumkin edi. Ikkinchi tendentsiya ishonchliligini ta'minlash uchun zarur bo'lgan resurslarni yomon rejalashtirilgan va uyushgan ravishda sotib olish. Uchinchi tendentsiya salohiyatga e'tibor bermayapti agar mijozlar elektr ta'minotchisi ishlamay qolsa, 2000 yil boshidagi inqirozda bo'lgani kabi, elektr energiyasini yo'qotishi mumkin. Tanqidchilar "Yashil kitob" dagi qo'pol prognozlar va noaniq tavsiyalar asosli emas deb javob berishdi.[60]

Energiya tizimining parchalanishi bilan bog'liq bo'lgan xatarlar

Tizimning parchalanishi davlatni toza energiya maqsadlarini bajarmaydigan ishonchlilik xavfiga yaqinlashtiradi: Kaliforniyada 40 ta xizmat ko'rsatuvchi korxonalar mavjud, ular tarkibiga 19 ta CCA kiradi. CCA-larning ko'tarilishi Kaliforniyaning uchta yirik tartibga solinadigan kommunal xizmatlarining shtat tarmoqlarining ishonchliligi ehtiyojlarining asosiy ta'minotchilari sifatida rolini buzdi va CCA'lar tizimni karbonizatsiyalashganligi sababli barqaror ushlab turish uchun zarur bo'lgan resurslarning etarliligini rejalashtirish turini amalga oshirmayapti.[61]

Shtat energetika tizimi tobora parchalanib borayotgan bir paytda, regulyatorlar va siyosatchilar tizimni ishonchli ushlab turish uchun resurslarning etarliligi va davlat 2045 yilgacha 100% toza energiyaga ega bo'lish maqsadiga erishadimi, degan xavotirlarni bildirmoqdalar. Kaliforniya ma'muriy huquq sudyasining so'nggi hisoboti Barcha yuklarni etkazib beradigan tashkilotlar tomonidan amalga oshirilgan Integratsiyalashgan Resurslar Rejalarini tahlil qilib, quyidagilarni ta'kidladilar: "Kaliforniyadagi yangi resurslarning aksariyati keyingi o'n yil ichida CCAlar tomonidan sotib olinishi kutilayotganligi sababli, bu ularning IRP jarayoniga qo'shgan hissalariga qo'shimcha e'tibor qaratmoqda. Umuman olganda, ba'zi CCAlarning umuman IRP jarayoniga nisbatan munosabati. Bir nechta CCAlar o'zlarining mahalliy boshqaruv kengashlari tomonidan tasdiqlangan ixtiyoriy rejalarining Komissiyaning IRP jarayoni ustidan ustunligini ta'kidladilar va Komissiyaning IRP jarayonlari ularning shaxsiy resurslarini sotib olish rejalariga mos kelmasligini ta'kidladilar. Bu kelgusi yillarda davlat duch keladigan muammoning mohiyatini namoyish etadi, chunki tobora ko'proq yuklarni IOUga kirmaydiganlar, xususan CCA provayderlari etkazib berishmoqda. "[62]

Bu masala shu qadar dolzarb bo'lib qoldiki, Kaliforniya qonunchilik palatasi CPUCga shtat iqlimiga mos keladigan elektr energiyasini sotib olish uchun backstop bo'lib xizmat qilish vazifasini berish huquqini beradigan qonun loyihasini (AB 56, 2019 yil sentyabr oyida). , toza energiya va ishonchlilik maqsadlari.[63]

Kaliforniyadagi xaridor tanlovi

Kaliforniya CCA'lari odatda xaridorlarga bir nechta energiya dasturlarini tanlashni taklif qiladi - standart dastur (Odatda amaldagi kommunal xizmat tomonidan taqdim etilganga o'xshash energiya aralashmasi), quyosh energiyasiga asoslangan dastur va undan qimmatroq, 100% Qayta tiklanadigan dastur. Ushbu qayta tiklanadigan dasturni qayta tiklanadigan energiya manbalari bilan ta'minlangan kreditlar qo'llab-quvvatlaydi (mijozlar sotib olinadigan quvvatni ma'lum bir qayta tiklanadigan manbaga bog'lay olmaydi.) 2018 yilda ushbu dasturlar 37% dan 100% gacha yangilanadigan, shtat bo'yicha o'rtacha 52 foizni tashkil etdi.[64] CCA'lar shuningdek, quyoshli chegirmalar va aniq hisoblagichlarni taklif qilishlari mumkin, ba'zilari esa daromad keltiradigan mijozlar uchun elektr transport vositalarida chegirmalar taqdim etishi mumkin.

CCAlarning ba'zi takliflari Green- E tomonidan belgilangan standartlarga javob berishi mumkin. Masalan, Marin Clean Energy kompaniyasi "Ochiq yashil", "chuqur yashil" va "mahalliy Sol dasturi" ni taklif qiladi.[65] bu erda faqat Deep Green va Local Sol variantlari Green- E sertifikatiga ega. Green-e sertifikati - bu "Resurs echimlari markazi" notijorat tashkiloti tomonidan ishlab chiqilgan Green-E tomonidan belgilangan muayyan mezon va standartlarga javob beradigan tartibga solingan va belgilangan dasturlar.[66]

CCA stavkalari va iste'molchilar huquqlarini himoya qilish

CCA amaldagi kommunal xizmatidan pastroq yoki yuqori stavkalarni taklif qiladimi, PCIA hajmiga (chiqish to'lovi) bog'liqmi, amaldagi kommunal xizmat stavkalarini o'zgartiradimi,[67][68] va mijozga kerakli "Qayta tiklanadigan energiya" to'plami. CCA veb-saytlari odatda CCA stavkalarini amaldagi yordamchi dastur bilan taqqoslashadi. Masalan, Clean Power Alliance 2019 stavkalari Janubiy Kaliforniyadagi Edisonga nisbatan 1-2 foizga arzonroq (36 foiz toza quvvat uchun) va 7-9 foizga yuqori (agar mijozlar 100% toza quvvatni tanlasa, unda qayta tiklanadigan energiya manbalari to'plami mavjud emas).[69]

CPUC iste'molchilar huquqlarini himoya qilish masalalari bo'yicha nazoratni yo'qligi sababli CCA va mijozlar o'rtasidagi mijozlarning shikoyatlarini ko'rib chiqa olmaydi. Ushbu mas'uliyat CCA Direktorlar kengashiga tegishli. Bundan tashqari, CCAlar CPU orqali IOUlar kabi tartibga solinmaganligini hisobga olsak, xaridorlarning turli sinflari orasida xarajatlarni taqsimlash borasida hech qanday ko'rinish yo'q.[70]

Marin County Energy 10 xil tarif paketlarini taklif qiladi. O'zining E-1 to'plamini PG&E bilan taqqoslaganda, MCE Light Green (50% qayta tiklanadigan) darajasi PG&E stavkasidan 0,047% (olti sent) arzonroq. Agar mijoz MCE Deep Green (100% yangilanadigan) to'plamini tanlasa, PG&E Solarchoice (100% yangilanishi mumkin) to'plami MCE stavkasidan 1,2% (1,63 $) kam. MCE-ning boshqa to'qqizta to'plami bir-birini taqqoslaydi.[71]

Bandlik va kasaba uyushma munosabatlari

Kaliforniyada CCA mijozlari investorlarga qarashli kommunal xizmatlarning (IOU) mijozlari bo'lib qolmoqdalar. Buning sababi shundaki, CCA mijozlari amaldagi kommunal xizmatlardan bir qator xizmatlarni olishda davom etmoqdalar. Pacific Gas & Electric ta'kidlaganidek: "Agar mijoz CCA mijoziga aylansa, ular hali ham PG & E mijozi ekanligini unutmaslik kerak. Biz uzatish va tarqatish tizimimiz orqali CCA mijozlariga elektr energiyasini etkazib berishni davom ettirmoqdamiz, hisoblagichlarni o'qish, hisob-kitob qilish, mijozlarga xizmat ko'rsatish va texnik xizmatlarni taqdim etamiz. " [72]

IOU xodimlarining aksariyati elektr uzatish va tarqatish tizimiga texnik xizmat ko'rsatishni va elektr uzatish tarmoqlarini yangilashni, hisob-kitoblarni amalga oshirishni va mijozlarga xizmat ko'rsatishni ta'minlaydilar - bularning barchasi IOUlar tomonidan ta'minlanib kelinmoqda. CCA energiya etkazib beruvchilari uchun toza energiya ishlab chiqarish quvvatlarini qurish va ulardan foydalanish hamda CCAlar uchun call-markaz va boshqa xizmatlarni ko'rsatish uchun yangi ish o'rinlari yaratildi.

Kaliforniyadagi CCAlar kasaba uyushma ishchilari tomonidan qurilgan yangi energiya inshootlari bilan elektr energiyasini sotib olish to'g'risidagi shartnomalarni imzolash orqali kasaba uyushmalarining ish joylari va ish haqlarini qo'llab-quvvatlaydi. CCAlar qayta tiklanadigan energiya manbalari bilan umumiy qiymati 3600 megavattdan ortiq bo'lgan shartnomalar tuzdilar.[73] Qayta tiklanadigan yangi loyihalarni qurishda qatnashadigan ba'zi birlashmalar / savdo-sotiqlarga quyidagilar kiradi: duradgorlar (Mahalliy 152), IBEW (Mahalliy 11), IBEW (Mahalliy 47), IBEW (Mahalliy 100), IBEW (Mahalliy 125), IBEW (Mahalliy 184) , IBEW (Mahalliy 302), IBEW (Mahalliy 551), IBEW (Mahalliy 595), IBEW (Mahalliy 684), IBEW (Mahalliy 1245), Temirchilar (Mahalliy 155), Temirchilar (Mahalliy 416), Temirchilar (Mahalliy 433), Temir Ishchilar (mahalliy 378), ishchilar (mahalliy 294), ishchilar (mahalliy 300), ishchilar (mahalliy 324), ishchilar (mahalliy 1130), tegirmonchilar (mahalliy 102), operatsion muhandislar (mahalliy 3), operatsion muhandislar (mahalliy 12), Santexnika va quvurlar (mahalliy 228), jamoadoshlar. [74]

Shtat bo'ylab CCA chaqiriq markazlarida ham kasaba uyushma xodimlari ishlaydi. Masalan, Kaliforniyadagi Energy Choice kompaniyasining chaqiriq markazi vakillari 2018 yil may oyida IBEW 1245-ga a'zo bo'lish uchun saylangan. ECC - Calpine Energy Solutions kompaniyasining call-markazlari bilan shug'ullanadigan ayollarga tegishli biznes.[75] Calpine Kaliforniyadagi 21 ta CCA ning 17 tasi uchun ma'lumotlarni boshqarish va mijozlar bilan aloqa xizmatlarini taqdim etadi.

Kasaba uyushmalari mahalliy ish o'rinlarining o'sishini qo'llab-quvvatlamayotgani va qo'zg'atmaganligi, kasaba uyushma ish o'rinlarini qisqartirganligi va kasaba uyushma mehnatidan foydalanadigan elektr ta'minotchilari bilan shartnoma tuzganligi uchun CCAlarni tanqid qildi. CCA'lar IOUlarga qaraganda kamroq ishchilarni jalb qilmoqdalar va yirik transmilliy korporatsiyalar bilan tuzilgan shartnomalar asosan kasaba uyushmasidan foydalanish orqali amalga oshiriladi. Masalan, G'arbiy mehnat va menejment bo'yicha jamoatchilik bilan aloqalar qo'mitasi (G'arbiy LAMPC) Kaliforniyadagi CCAlar va ularning kasaba uyushma ishchilari bilan aloqalari to'g'risida tashvish bildirdi. Qo'mita MCE kompaniyasini Shell singari yirik, ko'p millatli energiya etkazib beruvchilar bilan tuzgan shartnomalari uchun tanqid qildi va MCE energiyaning katta qismini shtatdan tashqari uyushma bo'lmagan korporatsiyalardan sotib olishini aytdi. Shuningdek, Sonoma Clean Power kompaniyasi Constellation Power bilan tuzgan shartnomalari va Sonoma kompaniyasining mahalliy loyihalar bo'yicha qat'iy majburiyatlarni taqdim etishni istamasligi uchun tanbeh berdi.[76]

San-Diegodagi Xalqaro Elektr Ishchilar Birodarligi (IBEW) ning ikki mahalliy aholisi, San-Diego o'zining yangi CCA-ni tashkil etishi sababli kasaba uyushmalarining ishdan ketishidan xavotir bildirdi. Kasaba uyushma miqyosidagi ish haqini, har qanday qurilish loyihalarida ishtirok etishni va yangi CCAda ishchilar kasaba uyushmasi imkoniyatini istaydi. Los-Anjelesdagi elektr kasaba uyushma ishchilari kasaba uyushmalari uchun ish joylari mavjud bo'lgan taqdirda, CCA kontseptsiyasini ma'qulladilar.[77]

Kaliforniya CCAlari

Marin Clean Energy

Marin okrugi 2010 yil 7-mayda Kaliforniyaning birinchi CCA dasturini - MCE-ni ishga tushirdi, raqobatbardosh va barqaror stavkada 60% -100% qayta tiklanadigan energiyani taklif qiladi, energiya bilan bog'liq bo'lgan issiqxona gazlari chiqindilarini sezilarli darajada kamaytiradi va mahalliy energiya dasturlariga millionlab dollar qayta sarmoya kiritishga imkon beradi. MCE - bu 1000 MVt quvvatga ega bo'lgan eng yuqori yukni qo'llab-quvvatlovchi yukga xizmat qiluvchi korxona. CCA 480 mingdan ortiq mijozlarga elektr energiyasi xizmatini taqdim etadi[78] to'rtta Bay mintaqasida joylashgan Kontra-Kosta, Napa, Marin va Solano kabi 34 ta a'zolar jamoalarida hisob-kitoblar va bir milliondan ortiq aholi va korxonalar. [79]

Sonoma Clean Power

The Sonoma okrugi Iqlimni muhofaza qilishga asoslangan markaz 2008 yilda Iqlim bo'yicha jamoatchilik harakatlari rejasida Sonoma okrugida CCAni ta'qib qilish g'oyasini rasmiy ravishda taqdim etdi.[80] 2011 yilda Sonoma okrugi suv agentligi ishlab chiqarishni moliyalashtirgan a texnik-iqtisodiy asoslash savolni o'rganish. Texnik-iqtisodiy asoslash ijobiy bo'ldi va ko'pchilik jamoatchilik tomonidan ko'rib chiqilgandan va agentlikni boshqarish uchun Qo'shma kuchlar vakolatxonasi tashkil etilgandan so'ng, Sonoma Clean Power xizmati 2014 yil 1 maydan ishga tushirildi.[81] mavjud bo'lgan PG&E kommunal xizmatiga qaraganda arzonroq narxga, ham yashil, ham mahalliy manbalardan quvvatni taklif qiladi.[82][83] Oxir oqibat okrug va okrugning barcha sakkizta munosib shaharlari qo'shildi. Bunga Cloverdale, Cotati, Petaluma, Rohnert Park, Santa Rosa, Sebastopol, Sonoma va Windsor kiradi.[84]

2016 yilda Mendocino okrugi Sonoma Clean Power-ga qo'shilishga ovoz berdi va Sonoma Clean Power boshqaruv kengashi Mendocino okrugi va Fort Bragg, Willits va Point Arena shaharlarini qo'shma kuchlar idorasiga qabul qilish uchun ovoz berdi.

Lancaster Choice Energy

Lancaster Choice Energy (LCE) 2015 yil may oyida munitsipal hisob raqamlarini qayta tiklanadigan energiya bilan ta'minlay boshladi. Shu paytgacha, hozirgacha[qachon? ] shahri Lancaster, Kaliforniya eng yuqori yukning deyarli 14 foizini (147 megavatt) qayta tiklanadigan energiya manbalari bilan qopladi. Lankaster AQShdagi birinchi nol shaharga aylanishni maqsad qilgan, Lankaster xususiy sektorning bir nechta sheriklari bilan birgalikda iste'mol qilgandan ko'ra ko'proq toza energiya ishlab chiqarishga bel bog'lagan. Shahar yanada samarali, barqaror tuzilmalarni qurish bo'yicha yangi qoidalarni o'rnatdi.[85] Lancaster Choice Energy kompaniyasining birinchi to'liq ish yilining oxiriga kelib, Lancaster shahrida 55000 ta akkaunt mavjud edi. LCE mijozlari standart Clear Choice mahsuloti orqali kamida 36% qayta tiklanadigan energiya oladi, ko'pchilik esa 100% gacha qayta tiklanadigan Smart Choice-ni tanlaydi. Bundan tashqari, LCE birinchi quyosh energiyasi o'simlik endi jonli. SPower tomonidan qurilgan ushbu zavod Lancasterda ishlab chiqarilgan 10 MVt quvvatni to'g'ridan-to'g'ri Lancaster aholisi uchun ta'minlaydi va taxminan 1800 ta uyni ta'minlash uchun etarli.[86]

CleanPowerSF

2016 yil may oyida San-Frantsisko shahri va okrugi boshlangan.

Yarim orolning toza energiyasi

Yarim orolning toza energiyasi (PCE) (https://www.peninsulacleanenergy.com/ ) 2016 yil fevral oyida San-Mateo okrugi va okrugning barcha birlashtirilgan 20 ta shahar va shaharchalarining bir ovozdan bergan ovozlari bilan tashkil etilgan.[87] U 2016 yil kuzida xaridorlarga elektr energiyasini etkazib berishni boshladi va hozirgi kunda Kaliforniyadagi eng katta jamoatchilik tanlovi dasturi.[88]2017 yil iyun oyidan boshlab u o'z mijozlariga toza (kamida 50% qayta tiklanadigan va 75% issiqxona gazisiz) va amaldagi PG&E kommunal xizmatidan arzonroq narxdagi asosiy mahsulotni taklif qildi.[89] 2017 yil iyun oyidan boshlab u o'z mijozlariga 100% yangilanadigan mahsulotni taklif qildi, bu PG & E kompaniyasining 100% yangilanadigan mahsulotiga qaraganda ancha arzon.

Silikon vodiysi toza energiya

Silicon Valley Clean Energy (SVCE) 2017 yil 3 aprelda o'z ishini Kempbell, Kupertino, Gilroy, Los Altos, Los Altos Hills, Los Gatos, Monte Sereno, Morgan Hill singari 12 ta Silikon vodiysi jamoalariga 100% issiqxonalar bepul elektr energiyasi bilan ta'minlash orqali boshladi. , Mountain View, Saratoga, Sunnyvale va yakka tartibdagi Santa-Klara okrugi. https://www.svcleanenergy.org/about-us

East Bay Community Energy

East Bay Community Energy, also abbreviated EBCE, ebce.org, was formed in October 2016 by Alameda County and the cities of Albany, Berkeley, Dublin, Emeryville, Fremont, Hayward, Livermore, Oakland, Piedmont, San Leandro, and Union City.[90] East Bay Community Energy began providing electricity in June 2018 for commercial and municipal customers and November 2018 for residential customers.[91]

EBCE offers customers three energy services. Their Bright Choice service uses a slightly larger amount of clean energy sources as Tinch okeani gaz va elektr kompaniyasi (PG&E) but it costs less. Their Brilliant 100 option service is greener (100% carbon-free) and uses more renewable energy than PG&E electricity at the same price. A third service is their Renewable 100 option which uses 100% renewable energy and is offered at a cost just above the PG&E rate.[92]

Central Coast Community Energy (formerly Monterey Bay Community Power)

Central Coast Community Energy (CCCE) procures carbon-free electricity for over 400,000 customers in 33 communities in Monterey, San Benito, Santa Cruz, San Luis Obispo, and Santa Barbara Counties. MBCP began serving commercial customers in March 2018, with residential service beginning July 2018. CCCE matches PG&E rates. MBCP is the 3rd oldest CCA in California, the only multi-county CCA in California, and geographically is the largest. https://3cenergy.org https://www.mbcommunitypower.org/

San Jose Clean Energy

On May 16, 2017 San Jose City council approved the creation of San Jose Clean Energy, making San Jose the largest city in California to adopt a CCA.[93]

Toza quvvat alyansi

Formed in 2017, a new CCA opened in February 2019 in Los Angeles and Ventura counties in Southern California. The Clean Power Alliance will provide electrical energy to residents of 29 cities and unincorporated parts of the counties. Cities like Los Angeles, Burbank, and Glendale who have municipal utilities, will remain with their local energy source.

Clean Power Alliance provides three rate plans to its customers, all varying in renewable sources of energy. Plan one offers 36% renewable at a cost 1% cheaper than Southern California Edison (SCE). The second plan has 50% renewable energy and is the same cost as SCE; the third provides 100% renewable power at a cost 9% higher than SCE. All the rates are set by the CPA board, whose 31 directors represent each city and county served.[94]

San Diego CCA

In 2019, the city council of San Diego voted to develop a CCA that would provide electric power to San Diego, as well as Chula Vista, La Mesa, Encinitas and Imperial Beach CA. The city hopes that the CCA, which will be the second largest in the state after Los Angeles’ Clean Power Alliance, will be operational by 2021. The not-yet-named CCA expects to offer its customers rates about 5% lower than those of IOU San-Diego gaz va elektr energiyasi. Program supporters say the CCA will provide green sources of power at rates lower or equal to those of SDG&E. This is critical as San Diego's climate plan calls for 100% renewable energy by 2035; more ambitious than the state of California's by ten years.

Critics of the CCA say cities have little or no experience in purchasing or generating electricity and the unpredictable nature of the energy industry can lead to volatility and chaotic conditions. Unions find the plan “labor weak;” the Sierra Club commented that the CCA should insure that nuclear and fossil fuel energy be completely excluded from the CCA's energy procurement.[95]

California Community Choice Association

In 2016, the five existing Community Choice agencies - MCE Clean Energy, Sonoma Clean Power, Lancaster Choice Energy, CleanPowerSF, and Peninsula Clean Energy - formed a 501 (c) (6) foyda keltirmaydigan savdo uyushmasi, the California Community Choice Association, also known as CalCCA. CalCCA held its first meeting in San Francisco on October 20, 2016.

Emerging CCAs in California

Multiple cities across the state of California are considering the implementation of Community Choice aggregation programs across their districts.[96] California has many communities who are anticipated to launch CCAs, this includes San-Diego va Butt okrugi. There are also other cities and counties who are exploring and in the process of implementing CCA, this includes Fresno okrugi va San-Luis Obispo okrugi.

Illinoys

The state of Illinois adopted a CCA law in 2009, which has led to an increase of communities providing electricity services to over 2/3 of the state's population as of 2014, including the city of Chikago, uning meri Rahm Emanuel is focusing the program on reducing coal power production and increasing renewable energy.[97]

As of October 2013, 671 Illinois cities and towns (representing 80% of the state's residential electricity market) have utilized CCA.[98]

By the end of 2013, 91 local governments in Illinois (representing 1.7 million state residents) used the state's 2009 CCA law to purchase 100% renewable electricity for their communities.[99]

Savings through the Illinois CCAs were at their best in 2013, when customers saved over $250 million, but fixed-price contracts with providers expired and rates leveled. In summer 2016 114 communities dropped or suspended their CCA programs. The biggest change was in Chicago where the initial sign-up for the program was 750,000 homes – almost two million people. In 2015, most returned to their original utility power supplier.[100]

When Illinois' CCAs began, cost savings were guaranteed by law, with aggregators saving 30% below fixed utility prices during a transitional period when utility default rates were frozen to allow retail marketers to get started. Total CCA savings peaked in 2013, with CCA customers saving $258 million compared to ComEd's default rate. However, once ComEd's fixed price contracts started to expire and rates fell closer to market prices, short-term contracts set prices like those of competitive energy suppliers. As a result, many of Illinois’ CCAs were not saving money, resulting in CCA customers spending $188 million more than the incumbent utility's default rate over a two-year timeframe.[101]

Nyu-Jersi

New Jersey adopted a CCA law in 2003, but did not see active formation of aggregations until 2013, when Bergen okrugi, Passay okrugi, and fifteen other cities and counties started CCA programs, focused on both lowering electric bills and in some cases greening their power supply, or both.[102]

Nyu York

The Nyu-York davlat jamoat xizmati komissiyasi (PSC) has identified CCA as consistent with the stated goals of the regulatory reform "Reforming the Energy Vision” (REV),[103] and has stated that local energy planning helps municipalities benefit from distributed energy resources enabled by REV.[104] CCA legislation had been filed in the Nyu-York shtat assambleyasi 2014 yil fevral oyida,[105] followed by Governor Endryu Kuomo 's order directing the PSC to implement CCA directly under its own authority in December 2014.[106]

In December 2014, non-profit organization Sustainable Westchester submitted a petition to the PSC on behalf of its member municipalities to implement a CCA demonstration program in Vestchester okrugi.[107] The PSC granted the Order on February 26, 2015 authorizing Sustainable Westchester to put out an RFP and award contracts for both electric and natural gas supply for residents and small businesses within municipalities in the county that pass a resolution to join the CCA: "The Sustainable Westchester pilot is expected to provide valuable experience on CCA design and outcomes that, in addition to the many comments in that proceeding, will assist the Commission in making a determination on statewide implementation of CCA."[108]

The program launched in 2015, becoming the first operational CCA in New York State.[109] Similar local CCA organizing efforts are underway in Ulster okrugi, Sallivan okrugi, Hudson tog'lari, and other communities.[110]

Rod-Aylend

The Utility Restructuring Act of 1996 deregulated the utility market within Rhode Island, allowing consumers to choose their electricity generation supplier and CCAs to form.[111] While this act allowed for the creation of CCAs, there are currently no residential or small business CCAs available for private consumers to join. The only CCA option is for municipal facilities.

Rhode Island Energy Aggregation Program (REAP)

The Reap program “is operated by the Rhode Island League of Cities & Towns and serves 36 of Rhode Island’s 39 municipalities and four school districts”.[112] The Reap program facilitated the purchase of electricity by the municipal entity by submitting requests for proposals, reviewing bids from approved electricity generators, and selecting companies that they believe will be the ideal provider for each municipality. The program reported in 2012 it had achieved cost savings of 20-30% over the standard offer.[112]

Afzalliklari va kamchiliklari

There are advantages and disadvantages associated with the implementation of Community Choice Aggregation across different localities. CCA provides benefits like providing a customer choice, reduced energy costs, renewable energy, and environmental benefits.[113]

By providing customer choice, customers have the ability to be enrolled in CCA or maintain their current utility provider. Customers are automatically enrolled in the program but they can choose to opt out of it. CCAs reduce energy costs, lowering rates for customers. This also increases the use of affordable renewable energy, provided through wind, solar, and geothermal steam. This provides environmental benefits for communities because it reduces natural gas consumption and greenhouse gas emissions.[114]

There are also disadvantages associated with the implementation of CCAs. Potential issues associated with the implementation include political and financial obstacles. CCAs can encounter groups lobbying against its implementation, setbacks from Mening to‘plamlarim, exit fees, and even disadvantages associated with the opt out choices.

On the political level, local government can be opposed by groups and organizations. An example of this is when the IOU Tinch okeani gaz va elektr kompaniyasi opposed the creation of CCA by supporting California Proposition 16 in 2010, which would had made it difficult for California to implement CCAs across the state.[115] Another utility provider who took action was San-Diego gaz va elektr who attempted to stop local government from implementing CCA programs. SDG&E created a separate entity, that would allow them to lobby against CCAs in San Diego County.[116]

Adabiyotlar

  1. ^ Qonun chiqaruvchilar, davlatning milliy konferentsiyasi. "Community Choice Aggregation Policies". www.ncsl.org. Olingan 2017-10-07.
  2. ^ "Community Choice Aggregation - Definition by CCA Inventor Local Power Inc". localpower.com. Olingan 26 aprel 2017.
  3. ^ "Community choice aggregation: How far can it push energy sector transformation? | SEPA". SEPA. 2017-06-08. Olingan 2017-10-16.
  4. ^ Roth, Sammy (January 25, 2019). "Here's how local governments are replacing California's biggest utilities". Los Anjeles Tayms. Olingan 27 yanvar 2019.
  5. ^ Nikolewski, Rob (9 September 2018). "CCA 101: How does Community Choice Aggregation work? What you need to know". San-Diego Union-Tribune. San Diego CA.
  6. ^ Swindell, Bill (4 August 2019). "As PG&E faces uncertainty, Sonoma Clean Power sees a bright future in green energy". Santa Rosa Press-demokrat. Santa Rosa CA.
  7. ^ UCLA Luskin Center for Innovation. "THE RAPID GROWTH OF COMMUNITY CHOICE ENERGY AND ITS ACCELERATION OF RENEWABLE ENERGY" (PDF). Iqtibos jurnali talab qiladi | jurnal = (Yordam bering)
  8. ^ UCLA Luskin Center for Innovation. "PROGRESS TOWARD 100% CLEAN ENERGY IN CITIES & STATES ACROSS THE U.S." (PDF).
  9. ^ O’Shaughnessy, Eric (February 2019). "Community Choice Aggregation: Challenges, Opportunities, and Impacts on Renewable Energy Markets". Qayta tiklanadigan energiya milliy laboratoriyasi. NREL/TP-6A20-72195. Golden CO: U.S. Department of Energy Office of Energy Efficiency & Renewable Energy Operated by the Alliance for Sustainable Energy, LLC.
  10. ^ Paulos, Bentham (1 May 2017). "Should Investor-Owned Utilities Be Worried About Community Choice Aggregation?". Quvvat. Rockville MD: Access Intelligence, LLC.
  11. ^ a b "Map of Deregulated Energy States (Updated 2017) – Electric Choice". Electric Choice. Olingan 2017-10-07.
  12. ^ "Lean Energy U.S. – CCA by State". www.leanenergyus.org. Olingan 2017-10-16.
  13. ^ http://www.local.org/masscomp.html Electric Power Alert, Volume V. No.1 - January 4, 1995
  14. ^ "Power Play". fastcompany.com. 1 sentyabr 2008 yil. Olingan 26 aprel 2017.
  15. ^ "Power by the People". bates.edu. 2010 yil 21 aprel. Olingan 26 aprel 2017.
  16. ^ "Biz haqimizda". Cape Light Compact. 2014-03-23. Olingan 2017-10-07.
  17. ^ Boston makes its move into electricity purchasing for its residents and businesses
  18. ^ Jamiyat tanlovini birlashtirish - with case studies of a few Massachusetts towns
  19. ^ "History of NOPEC" (PDF). nopec.org. Solon OH: Northeast Ohio Public Energy Council. 2015 yil mart.
  20. ^ McVoy, Ronald (2018). "A letter from the chairman" (PDF). nopec.org. Solon OH: Northern Ohio Public Energy Council. Olingan 13 sentyabr 2019.
  21. ^ Todd, Mark (24 September 2018). "NOPEC has earmarked $308,000 in energy grants". Ashtabula Star Beacon. Ashtabula OH: Community Newspaper Holdings, Inc.
  22. ^ https://www.dispatch.com/story/news/politics/government/2020/11/03/election-results-columbus-issue-1-green-energy-electricity-plan/6085061002/
  23. ^ http://www.leginfo.ca.gov/pub/01-02/bill/asm/ab_0101-0150/ab_117_bill_20020924_chaptered.pdf
  24. ^ http://docs.cpuc.ca.gov/PUBLISHED/FINAL_DECISION/42389.htm
  25. ^ http://docs.cpuc.ca.gov/PUBLISHED/FINAL_DECISION/52127.htm
  26. ^ "Giving Power to the People". yaxshi.is. 2009 yil 20-iyul. Olingan 26 aprel 2017.
  27. ^ Kahn, Debra (7 January 2010). "Community Bids to Bypass Utilities Facing Hurdles in Calif". Nyu-York Tayms. New York NY: New York Times Co.
  28. ^ "PG&E initiative on power suppliers on ballot". sfgate.com. Olingan 26 aprel 2017.
  29. ^ York, Anthony (22 October 2009). "Initiative backers submit paperwork promising a busy 2010 cycle". Kapitoliy haftaligi. Sacramento CA: Open California. Arxivlandi asl nusxasi 2010 yil 31 mayda.
  30. ^ "Santa Kruz Sentinel, "Prop 16 is June's priciest ballot initiative, with PG&E coughing up big money", March 25, 2010". mercurynews.com. Olingan 26 aprel 2017.
  31. ^ http://www.sfweekly.com/2009-01-14/news/green-scheme/
  32. ^ "Financing Green Projects". renewableenergyworld.com. Olingan 26 aprel 2017.
  33. ^ "The Bottom Line - Green and cheap energy: Can Sonoma County have both?". metroactive.com. Olingan 26 aprel 2017.
  34. ^ California Community Choice Association. "Celebrating 10 Years of CCA Service in California".
  35. ^ "California's AB 2145 Threatens Community Choice Aggregates". cleantechnica.com. Olingan 26 aprel 2017.
  36. ^ Siegle, Tyson (22 December 2016). "The Benefits of Community Choice Energy and How California Utilities Aim to Block Them". San-Diego bepul matbuoti. San Diego CA.
  37. ^ https://www.cpuc.ca.gov/rps/
  38. ^ https://innovation.luskin.ucla.edu/wp-content/uploads/2019/11/Rapid_Growth_of_Community_Choice_Energy.pdf
  39. ^ https://cal-cca.org/regulatorylegislative/
  40. ^ https://cal-cca.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/08/CCAs-Contact-Info-and-Location-web.pdf
  41. ^ https://cal-cca.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/10/CCA-Power-Purchasing.pdf
  42. ^ https://cal-cca.org/cca-impact/
  43. ^ Trabish, Herman (18 July 2019). "The new kid on the block: CCAs face credit, other challenges to lead California's renewable energy growth". utility dive.com. Washington DC: Industry Dive.
  44. ^ "California PUC Allows State's Largest Utility to Charge Customers More for Joining CCAs". Govtech.org. Olingan 29 noyabr 2017.
  45. ^ "A Community Choice Customer Perspective on the PCIA, The Utility Power Charge Indifference Adjustment" (PDF). 2016 yil aprel. Olingan 29 noyabr 2017. Iqtibos jurnali talab qiladi | jurnal = (Yordam bering)
  46. ^ DeShazo, J.R. (July 2017). "The Promises and Challenges of Community Choice Aggregation in California" (PDF). The Luskin Center. Los Angeles: The Luskin Center for Innovation, UCLA.
  47. ^ DeShazo, J.R. (July 2017). "The Promises and Challenges of Community Choice Aggregation in California" (PDF). The Luskin Center. Los Angeles: The Luskin Center for Innovation, UCLA.
  48. ^ DeShazo, J.R. (July 2017). "The Promises and Challenges of Community Choice Aggregation in California" (PDF). innovation.luskin.ucla.edu. Los-Anjelesdagi Kaliforniya universiteti.
  49. ^ "Growth and Impacts of California Community Choice Aggregation (CCA) Programs" (PDF). 2017 yil 28 aprel. Olingan 29 noyabr 2017. Iqtibos jurnali talab qiladi | jurnal = (Yordam bering)
  50. ^ Walton, Robert (12 October 2018). "California decision means higher costs for community choice programs". Utility sho'ng'in. Washington DC: Industry Dive.
  51. ^ "Peninsula Clean Energy CCA Technical Study" (PDF). 16 oktyabr 2016 yil. Olingan 29 noyabr 2017. Iqtibos jurnali talab qiladi | jurnal = (Yordam bering)
  52. ^ Heeter, Jenny (February 2019). "Community Choice Aggregation: Challenges, Opportunities, and Impacts on Renewable Energy Markets" (PDF). Qayta tiklanadigan energiya milliy laboratoriyasi. Washington DC: US Department of Energy.
  53. ^ Trabish, Herman (8 July 2019). "The new kid on the block: CCAs face credit, other challenges to lead California's renewable energy growth". Utilitydive.com. Washington DC: Industry Dive.
  54. ^ Barrow, Deanne (December 2017). "Financing projects with CCA contracts". nortonrosefulbright.com. London, England, UK: Norton Rose Fulbright.
  55. ^ Somstra, Karl Erik (7 May 2019). "New Challenge for California's Utilities, Rating Agency Warms to Community Aggregators". Greentechmedia. Boston MA: Wood Mackenzie.
  56. ^ "What is a CCA?". Leanenergyus.org. San Francisco CA: Lean Energy.
  57. ^ Trabish, Herman (9 July 2018). "As California customer choice expands, are reliability and affordability at risk?". Utilitydive.com. Washington DC: Industry Dive.
  58. ^ Roth, Sammy (7 February 2019). "California's utilities are losing their monopoly, is that a good thing?". Los Anjeles Tayms. El Segundo CA: Nant Capital.
  59. ^ Picker, Michael (3 May 2018). "Choice is here for California's energy consumers. What's next?". Sakramento asalari. Sacramento CA: McClatchy Co.
  60. ^ Trabish, Herman (18 May 2018). "California regulators see signs of a new energy crisis — can they prevent it?". Utilitydive.com. Washington DC: Industry Dive.
  61. ^ Trabish, Herman (9 July 2017). "As California customer choice expands, are reliability and affordability at risk?". Utility sho'ng'in. Washington DC: Industry Dive.
  62. ^ Simon, Ann (18 March 2019). "Proposed Decision of Administrative Law Judge, "Agenda ID#17300"" (PDF). CPUC.com. San Francisco CA: California Public Utilities Commission.
  63. ^ Trabish, Herman (15 April 2019). "Renewable procurement gaps pose risk for California's climate goals, but what solution is best?". Utility Dive.com. Washington DC: Industry Dive.
  64. ^ DeShazo, J.R. (July 2017). "Community Choice Aggregation, Impacts to California's Grid" (PDF). Innovation.luskin.ucla.edu. Los Angeles Ca: UCLA Luskin Center for Innovation.
  65. ^ "Your Energy Choices". mcecleanenergy.org. San Rafael CA: Marin Clean Energy. Olingan 13 sentyabr 2019.
  66. ^ "About Green-E Energy" (PDF). green-e.org. San Francisco CA: Center for Resource Solutions. Olingan 13 sentyabr 2019.
  67. ^ Martinez, Arlene (23 June 2019). "Ventura County cities plan return to Southern California Edison for some energy accounts". Ventura County Star. Camarillo CA: Gannett Company.
  68. ^ St. John, Jeff (11 October 2018). "California to Hike Fees for Community Choice Aggregators, Direct Service Providers". Green Tech Media. Boston MA: Wood Mackenzie.
  69. ^ "Residential Rates". cleanpoweralliance.org. Los Angeles CA: Clean Power Alliance of Southern California. Olingan 13 sentyabr 2019.
  70. ^ Henderson, Rachael (8 June 2017). "Community choice aggregation: How far can it push energy sector transformation?". sepapower.org. Smart Electric Power Alliance.
  71. ^ "2019 PG&E MCE Joint Rate Comparisons" (PDF). pge.com. San Francisco CA: Pacific Gas and Electric. Olingan 13 sentyabr 2019.
  72. ^ Aksiya yangiliklari. "Butte County Looks to Localize Energy".
  73. ^ California Community Choice Association. https://cal-cca.org/cca-impact/. Yo'qolgan yoki bo'sh sarlavha = (Yordam bering)
  74. ^ California Community Choice Association. "CCAs and Union Labor".
  75. ^ IBEW Local 1245. "NEWS-ORGANIZING Energy Choice California Call Center Reps Unanimously Choose IBEW 1245".
  76. ^ "Labor Friendly Community Choice Aggregation" (PDF). westernlampac.org. Seatac WA: Western Labor and Management Public Affairs Committee. 2015 yil bahor.
  77. ^ Rivard, Ry (25 February 2019). "Labor Fights Over the City's New Energy Agency Are Just Getting Started". San-Diego ovozi. San Diego CA: VOSD.
  78. ^ "CCA - Power in Numbers". CalCCA.org. San Francisco CA: California Community Choice Association.
  79. ^ "Serving". mcecleanenergy.org. San Jose CA: Marin County Energy.
  80. ^ http://coolplan.org/ccap-report/source-material/1%20Energy.pdf[doimiy o'lik havola ]
  81. ^ "Sonoma Clean Power flips switch for first customers". northbaybusinessjournal.com. 2014 yil 1-may. Olingan 26 aprel 2017.
  82. ^ "New Sonoma utility promises cleaner, cheaper power". sfgate.com. Olingan 26 aprel 2017.
  83. ^ "Power brokers: Sonoma County plan imminent | Petaluma360.com | Petalu…". arxiv.ph. 2013-06-15. Arxivlandi asl nusxasi 2013-06-15. Olingan 2019-11-13.
  84. ^ "History - Sonoma Clean Power". sonomacleanpower.org. Arxivlandi asl nusxasi 2017 yil 20 aprelda. Olingan 26 aprel 2017.
  85. ^ "Energy Globe Award – The World Award For Sustainability". energyglobe.info. Olingan 26 aprel 2017.
  86. ^ "Lancaster Solar Plant Surges to Life - San Fernando Valley Business Journal". sfvbj.com. Olingan 26 aprel 2017.
  87. ^ "Clement 'Jim' Faber". San Mateo Daily Journal. Olingan 2019-11-13.
  88. ^ Repost, News Article (2017-04-19). "Peninsula Clean Energy Now Serving All of San Mateo County with Lower Cost, Cleaner Electricity". Clean Power Exchange. Olingan 2019-11-13.
  89. ^ "San Mateo County ditches PG&E, starts buying cheaper, greener energy". Merkuriy yangiliklari. 2016-10-02. Olingan 2019-11-13.
  90. ^ "Qo'shma vakolatlar to'g'risida bitim" (PDF).
  91. ^ "East Bay Community Energy - City of Berkeley, CA". www.cityofberkeley.info. Olingan 2018-05-29.
  92. ^ "East Bay Community Energy to be Berkeley's electricity provider". Kundalik Kaliforniyalik. 2018-04-17. Olingan 2018-05-29.
  93. ^ "San Jose news". Merkuriy yangiliklari. Olingan 2019-11-13.
  94. ^ Roth, Sammy (1 February 2019). "What you need to know about Clean Power Alliance, SoCal's newest electric company". Los Anjeles Tayms. El Segundo CA: LA Times Communications.
  95. ^ Nikolewski, Rob (17 September 2019). "San Diego City Council takes the leap into community choice energy". San-Diego Union Tribune. Culver City CA: Nant Capital LLC.
  96. ^ http://www.leanenergyus.org/cca-by-state/california/
  97. ^ Lydersen, Kari. "How Chicago's municipal aggregation could be a boon for renewable energy". midwestenergynews.com. Olingan 26 aprel 2017.
  98. ^ Lean Energy U.S. (October 2013). "CCA By State - Illinois". Olingan 2014-03-21.
  99. ^ WWF (March 2014). "91 Illinois Communities Powered 100% By Green Electricity". CleanTechnica. Olingan 2014-03-09.
  100. ^ Paulos, Bentham (1 May 2017). "Should Investor-Owned Utilities Be Worried About Community Choice Aggregation?". Quvvat. Rockville MD: Access Intelligence LLC.
  101. ^ Paulos, Bentham (1 May 2017). "Should Investor-Owned Utilities Be Worried About Community Choice Aggregation?". Power Magazine. Rockville MD: Access Intelligence.
  102. ^ "Herald News: Aggregation could help reduce utility bills". northjersey.com. Olingan 26 aprel 2017.
  103. ^ "14-M-0101: Energiya nuqtai nazarini isloh qilish (REV)". ny.gov. Olingan 26 aprel 2017.
  104. ^ http://documents.dps.ny.gov/public/Common/ViewDoc.aspx?DocRefId={BDB4EB41-3E10-4BD0-AC6D-97EB40F7798D}
  105. ^ http://localpower.com/A08883_Summary_&_bill_text_Local_Power_Inc_2015.pdf
  106. ^ Author, Guest (3 June 2015). "Community Choice Programs Empower Electricity Customers in New York and Beyond". edf.org. Olingan 26 aprel 2017.
  107. ^ http://sustainablewestchester.org/images/toolkits/CCA/CCA_Sustainable_Westchester_petition.pdf[doimiy o'lik havola ]
  108. ^ http://sustainablewestchester.org/images/toolkits/CCA/CCA_PSC_approval_pressrelease.pdf[doimiy o'lik havola ]
  109. ^ "Arxivlangan nusxa". Arxivlandi asl nusxasi 2016-10-24 kunlari. Olingan 2016-11-03.CS1 maint: nom sifatida arxivlangan nusxa (havola)
  110. ^ Lupkin, Lea (19 October 2015). "How clean energy aggregation empowers neighborhoods". greenbiz.com. Olingan 26 aprel 2017.
  111. ^ "RIPUC - Summary of Major Provisions of the RI Utility Restructuring Act". www.ripuc.org. Olingan 2017-10-07.
  112. ^ a b "Lean Energy U.S. – Rhode Island". www.leanenergyus.org. Olingan 2017-10-07.
  113. ^ "Community Choice Aggregation Pilot Program" (PDF). 2009 yil sentyabr. Olingan 29 noyabr 2017. Iqtibos jurnali talab qiladi | jurnal = (Yordam bering)
  114. ^ "Community Choice Aggregation Pilot Program" (PDF). 2009 yil sentyabr. Olingan 29 noyabr 2017. Iqtibos jurnali talab qiladi | jurnal = (Yordam bering)
  115. ^ "Community Choice Aggregation in California" (PDF). 2010. Olingan 29 noyabr 2017. Iqtibos jurnali talab qiladi | jurnal = (Yordam bering)
  116. ^ "Community choice' could provide cheaper, greener electricity for San Diego, report says". San-Diego Union Tribune. 2017 yil 12-iyul. Olingan 29 noyabr 2017.

Tashqi havolalar