Yeomanry otliqlar - Yeomanry Cavalry - Wikipedia

Yeomanry otliqlar
Drawing of a yeomanry cavalryman on horseback
Yeomanry otliq askari 1798 yilgi rasmda
tomonidan Tomas Roullandson
Faol1794–1908
Mamlakat Buyuk Britaniya
 Birlashgan Qirollik
TuriYordamchi otliqlar

The Yeomanry otliqlar ning o'rnatilgan komponenti edi Britaniya ko'ngillilar korpusi, harbiy yordamchi 18-asr oxirida bosqin va qo'zg'olon qo'rquvi ostida tashkil etilgan Frantsiya inqilobiy urushlari. A yeoman obro'li, bir darajadan past bo'lgan, ijtimoiy darajadagi shaxs edi janob va yeomaniya dastlab qishloq edi, okrug - asoslangan kuch. A'zolar o'zlarining otlarini ta'minlashlari kerak edi va asosan ulardan jalb qilingan er egalari va ijarachi dehqonlar, ammo o'rta sinf ham oddiy va oddiy odamlarda ajralib turardi. Ofitserlar asosan orasidan jalb qilingan zodagonlik va qo'ndi janob. A komissiya umuman shaxsiy xarajatlar bilan bog'liq bo'lib, ijtimoiy mavqei muhim malakaga ega bo'lsa-da, asosiy omil shaxsiy boylik edi. Boshidanoq yeomanyada o'zlarining ijtimoiy mavqeini oshirish vositasini topgan yangi boylar kuchlarni moliyaviy qo'llab-quvvatlash qobiliyatlari uchun ofitserlar korpusiga qabul qilindi. Shaharlarni yollash 19-asrning oxirlarida kuchayib bordi va 20-asrning boshlarida yollangan tog'lardan tobora kengroq foydalanish natijasida namoyon bo'ldi.

Yeomaniya birinchi bo'lib mahalliy hokimiyatni qo'llab-quvvatlash uchun fuqarolik tartibsizliklarini bostirish uchun ishlatilgan, ayniqsa, 1795 yildagi oziq-ovqat isyonlari paytida. Milliy mudofaada uning yagona ishlatilishi 1797 yilda, Castlemartin Yeomanry kichik frantsuz bosqinini engishga yordam berganida edi. Baliqni himoya qilish jangi. Garchi mag'lubiyatdan so'ng ko'ngillilar korpusi tarqatib yuborilgan bo'lsa ham Napoleon 1815 yilda yeomaniya fuqarolik hokimiyatini qo'llab-quvvatlash uchun joylashtirilishi mumkin bo'lgan siyosiy ishonchli kuch sifatida saqlanib qoldi. 19-asrning o'rtalariga qadar ko'pincha politsiya sifatida xizmat qilgan. Eng mashhuri Manchester va Salford Yeomanri uchun asosan mas'ul bo'lgan Peterloo qirg'ini 1819 yilda Manchesterda bo'lib o'tgan parlament islohoti uchun mitingda politsiya paytida 17 ga yaqin odam halok bo'lgan va 650 ga yaqin kishi jarohat olgan. Yomg'irlik 1820-yillarda ish tashlashgan kolyerlarga qarshi ham joylashtirilgan. Swing tartibsizliklari 1830-yillarning boshlarida va Xartist 1830-yillarning oxiri va 40-yillarning 40-yillari boshidagi buzilishlar. Eksklyuziv a'zolik yeomeniyani politsiya tarkibidagi aholidan ajratib turar edi va huquqni muhofaza qilishning yaxshi imkoniyatlari paydo bo'lganda, yeomaniya uning borligi qarama-qarshiliklarga olib kelishi mumkinligidan qo'rqib, tobora ko'proq ushlab turilar edi. Uning ijtimoiy mavqei bu kuchni karikatura uchun, ayniqsa Piterloodan keyin mashhur maqsadga aylantirdi va u ko'pincha matbuotda, adabiyotda va sahnada satirik edi.

Tashkil etilishi fuqarolik politsiyasi kuchlari va 19-asrning o'rtalarida yangi bosqinchi qo'rqinchlari yeomraniyaning e'tiborini milliy mudofaaga aylantirdi, ammo uning samaradorligi va ushbu roldagi ahamiyati tobora ko'proq shubha ostiga qo'yildi. Uning kuchi pasayib ketdi, asosan a'zolarining siyosiy ta'siri va kuchga moliyaviy yordam berishga tayyorligi tufayli omon qoldi. Bir qator hukumat qo'mitalari kuchlarning muammolarini hal qila olmadi. So'nggisi, 1892 yilda, mamlakatni safarbar qilish sxemasida yeomriya uchun joy topdi, ammo faqatgina muntazam armiya tomonidan muvaffaqiyatsizliklar ketma-ket kelguniga qadar Ikkinchi Boer urushi yeomaniya o'rnatilgan piyoda askarlar sifatida yangi dolzarblikni topdi. Bu alohida uchun yadro berdi Imperial Yeomanry va urushdan keyin yeomaniya yana markaga aylandi blokda Imperial Yeomanry sifatida. 1908 yilda yeomaniya, uning tarkibiy qismiga aylangach, u alohida muassasa sifatida o'z faoliyatini to'xtatdi Hududiy kuch. Yeomaniya polklar ikkalasida ham otdan tushdi va otdan tushdi Birinchi jahon urushi va Ikkinchi jahon urushi. Yeomaniya merosi 21-asrda asosan inglizlarning to'rtta yeomaniya polklari tomonidan saqlanib kelinmoqda Armiya rezervi, unda 19-asrning ko'plab polklari namoyish etilgan otryadlar.

Fon

Evropada 18-asrning o'rtalaridan boshlab portlovchi aholi soni ko'paygan Buyuk Britaniya tomonidan joriy etilgan takomillashtirilgan dehqonchilik usullari bilan oziqlangan Qishloq xo'jaligi inqilobi. Xuddi shu vaqt ichida Sanoat inqilobi tobora ortib borayotgan urbanizatsiyani keltirib chiqardi, bu esa fermer xo'jaliklaridan oziq-ovqatga bo'lgan katta talablarni keltirib chiqardi. Ushbu talablarni qondirish uchun ko'proq intensiv ishlov berish xarajatlarni ko'payishiga olib keldi, ammo qishloq xo'jaligi ish haqini bir xil darajada qoldirdi, natijada qishloq jamoalarida qashshoqlik va ochlik paydo bo'ldi. Shahar markazlarida qashshoqlik muammosi ham mavjud edi, chunki mashinalardan foydalanish tobora ko'payib, malakali ishchi kuchi ishsiz qoldi. Ayni paytda siyosiy tizim o'zgaruvchan aholi soniga mos kelmadi. Bir vaqtlar aholi yashaydigan obod shaharchalar hali ham parlament a'zolarini (deputatlarni) saylash imkoniyatiga ega bo'lishgan bo'lsa-da - chirigan va cho'ntak tumanlari Kabi yirik yangi shaharlar Birmingem va "Manchester" vakili bo'lmagan. Qashshoqlik va huquqsizlik huquqi ijtimoiy norozilikka olib keldi va bu qo'rquvni keltirib chiqardi Frantsiya inqilobi Britaniyada taqlid qilinishi mumkin bo'lgan modelni taqdim etadi.[1]

1793 yilda Frantsiya inqilobiy hukumati e'lon qildi urush Buyuk Britaniyada, tashqi qo'zg'olon qo'rquviga xorijiy bosqinchilar qo'rquvini qo'shib, Londonda vahima paydo bo'lishiga olib keldi. Muntazam Britaniya armiyasi allaqachon oltitasini joylashtirgan brigadalar yilda Avstriya armiyasi bilan bir qatorda Gollandiya, mamlakatni himoya qilish uchun etarli emas edi va asosiy harbiy zaxira militsiya, na samarali va na ishonchli deb hisoblangan. Xulosasida u demobilizatsiya qilingan Amerika inqilobiy urushi 1783 yilda va oraliq o'n yil ichida uni tanqislikka olib keladigan xarajatlarni kamaytirish choralari ko'rilgan. U 1792 yilda qo'zg'olonga qarshi ehtiyot chorasi sifatida mujassamlangan edi, ammo asosan ishchilar sinfidan yollangan tanani o'zi militsiya bo'linmalarining 1795 yilgacha o'zlarining ish joylarida joylashishiga ishonib bo'lmaydigan darajada shubhali edi. Hukumat a qo'rquvi ostida 1779 yilda o'z kuchlarini ko'paytirish uchun ilgari ko'ngillilarga murojaat qilgan Frantsiya-ispan bosqini garchi bu qisqa muddatli bo'lsa va uzoq vaqt koloniyalardagi urush tugaganidan keyin omon qolmadi. Militsiya kamchiliklarini bartaraf etish uchun etarli vaqt yo'qligini hisobga olib, hukumat 1794 yilda xalqning mudofaasini kuchaytirish uchun yana ko'ngillilarga murojaat qildi.[2][3]

Kelib chiqishi

Painting of yeomanry in Hyde Park
London ko'ngillilarining otliq askarlari va Gayd Parkdagi uchib yuruvchi artilleriyasi haqida 1804 yildagi obzor

Ko'ngillilar uchun murojaat yaratishga olib keldi Ko'ngillilar korpusi, ulardan janoblar va Yeomani otliqlari, u ilgari deb nomlangan, o'rnatilgan komponent edi.[2][4] A yeoman an'anaviy ravishda a bepul egasi hurmatli mavqega ega, a ijtimoiy darajadan pastda janob va yeomaniya saflari asosan er egalari va ijarachi dehqonlar tomonidan to'ldirilgan edi. Ofitserlar qirol tomonidan tayinlangan komissiya, shaxsida Lord leytenant, va odatda zodagonlik va qo'ndi janob.[5] Yeomen o'zlarining tog'larini taqdim etishi kerak edi, bu kirish uchun katta moliyaviy to'siqni ko'rsatdi va yeomaniya eksklyuziv va obro'li tashkilot bo'lishini ta'minladi.[6][7] Fermerlardan tashqari, yeomaniya o'z safiga professionallar, savdogarlar va mohir hunarmandlarni jalb qildi, ammo dehqonlar jamoasi bilan mustahkam aloqalar, yeomaniya tadbirlari qishloq xo'jaligi taqvimini kuzatish bilan rejalashtirilganligini va ayniqsa, hosil yig'ish mashg'ulotlar jadvalidan xabardor bo'lishini anglatardi.[8]

Yomonlik edi okrug asoslangan va chaqirilishi mumkin (mujassamlangan) Lord leytenant yoki Sherif. A'zolar ishg'ol qilingan taqdirda harbiy qonunchilikka bo'ysungan holda to'langan. Dastlab, qo'shinlar faqat o'z uylarida yoki ularga qo'shni tumanlarda xizmat qilish uchun javobgardilar, biroq ba'zi qo'shinlar butun mamlakat bo'ylab xizmat qilish uchun javob berishga ovoz berishdi, boshqalari faqat o'z uylarida xizmat qilish bilan cheklanishdi.[9][10] Garchi ba'zi qo'shinlar tezda birlashib, okrug tuzdilar polklar kabi Wiltshire Yeomanry otliq 1797 yilda ko'pchilik yillar davomida mustaqil bo'lib qolishdi.[11][12][13] 1794 yil oxiriga kelib, har biri 60 kishigacha bo'lgan 28 dan 32 gacha yeomaniya qo'shinlari ko'tarildi. Hukumatning majburlash yo'li bilan ko'proq otliq askarlarni jalb qilishga urinishi, 1796 yildagi Muvaqqat otliqlar to'g'risidagi qonuni, ko'ngilli otliqlarga qiziqishni kuchaytirdi va 1799 yilga kelib 206 yeomaniya qo'shinlari mavjud edi. 1800 yilga kelib Vaqtinchalik otliqlar polklar yo tarqatib yuborilgan yoki yeomeniyaga singib ketgan, ular ijtimoiy mavqei pastligi sababli tez-tez chetlashtirilardi.[14][15]

Dastlabki joylashuvlar

Yomg'irlik harbiy tartibda bo'lganidek, qonun va tartibni ta'minlash vositasi edi va uning xizmat ko'rsatish shartlari qo'zg'olon va bosqinlardan himoya qilishni ta'kidladi.[10] 1797 yilda, frantsuzlar, chet el bosqinini qaytarishga faqat bir marta chaqirilgan Legion Noire ga tushdi Baliq himoyachisi Uelsda va Castlemartin Yeomanry yilda bosqinchilarni mag'lub etgan kuchning bir qismi edi Baliqni himoya qilish jangi.[16][a] Yeomaniya a kabi faolroq edi konstabulary paytida va korpuslar chaqirilgan 1794 yilda xiyonat sudlari, davomida 1795 yilgi oziq-ovqat tartibsizliklari va bunga javoban ilova norozilik, vayronagarchilik tomonidan amalga oshirildi Ludditlar Frantsiya bilan urushlar tugashidan oldingi yillarda norozi, demobilizatsiya qilingan harbiy xizmatchilar sabab bo'lgan tartibsizliklar.[7][18]

1801 yilga kelib, yeomaniya 21000 kishidan iborat bo'lib, aksariyat ingliz tillarida qo'shinlar, ko'plab Uels va Shotlandiyaning ba'zi okruglarida joylashgan. Ular shaharlarda, qishloqlarda va dvoryanlarning mulklarida joylashgan bo'lib, ularning soni biron bir okrugda birdan yigirmadan ko'proqgacha o'zgargan. Qo'shinlar Irlandiyada ham to'plangan bo'lib, u erda ular aks etgan Protestant ko'tarilishi. The Amiens tinchligi 1802 yilda armiya va dengiz flotining qisqartirilishi va militsiyaning tanazzulga uchrashi natijasida harbiylar sonining qisqarishiga olib keldi. Ixtiyoriy korpusni maoshsiz ushlab turishga ruxsat berish to'g'risidagi qonunlar qabul qilindi, ammo yeomaniya tashkiloti rad etildi, ammo 1803 yilda urush boshlanganda yana ko'payib ketdi.[19][20] Bosqinni tez-tez qo'rqitishlar bo'lgan - ayniqsa, 1804 yilda mayoqlar Shotlandiya pasttekisliklarida yoqib yuborilgan va 3000 nafar ko'ngillilar va xayolparastlar soxta signal - va g'alaba qozonish uchun yig'ilganlar. Trafalgar jangi 1805 yilda frantsuzlarning qo'nish qo'rquvini to'liq yo'q qilmadi.[21]

19-asrning boshlari qonunchilik va tanazzul

Bosqin xavfi Angliya siyosiy tafakkurining katta qismini mag'lubiyatga qadar egallab oldi Napoleon 1815 yilda va faqat 1802-1803 yillarda millatni himoya qilish uchun ixtiyoriy yoki majburiy ravishda kuchlarni jalb qilishga qaratilgan 21 ta alohida qonun hujjatlari mavjud edi.[22] 1901 yilgacha yeomani samarali boshqargan 1804 yilgi ko'ngillilarni birlashtirish to'g'risidagi qonun, qonunchilikning chalkashliklarini ratsionalizatsiya qildi. Aniq natija, ixtiyoriy xizmatni yanada jozibador qilish edi, bu esa mashhur bo'lmagan militsiyada xizmat majburiyatini oldini olish uchun muhim turtki bo'ldi.[23] Ko'ngillilar to'foniga duch kelgan Urush idorasi raqamlarni cheklashga urindi. Bu norozilikni keltirib chiqardi va ma'muriy javobgarlik Uy idorasi Natijada 1803 yilda.[24] Keyingi yilga kelib, ko'ngillilar va yeomanylar soni birgalikda 342000 kishidan oshdi, bu hukumat yaqin vaqt ichida qurollashi mumkin bo'lganidan ancha ko'p va 1805 yilda yeomaniya soni 33000 kishidan sal ko'proq edi.[25][26]

1806 yilda hukumat o'zgarishi natijasida ixtiyoriy kuchlar markaziy hukumat nazorati ostidan qochib, militsiya va doimiy armiya tarkibiga qo'shilishga putur etkazadigan qimmatbaho echim ekanligiga ishonish asosida siyosat o'zgaradi. 1808 yildagi mahalliy militsiya aktlari ko'ngillilarni unga o'tishlari uchun imtiyozli yangi militsiyani yaratdi. 1813 yilga kelib, Mahalliy militsiya ko'ngilli kuchga bo'lgan ehtiyojni bekor qildi, ular o'tgan yili 69 ming kishidan ozroq bosh tortgan edi va faqat bir nechta ko'ngillilar korpusi qoldi.[27] Yeomaniya, ammo keyin saqlanib qoldi Napoleon urushlari siyosiy jihatdan ishonchli kuch sifatida. Shunga qaramay, mamlakat miqyosidagi raqamlar qisqartirildi - 1817 yilgi raqamlar haqiqiy kuchni 18000 atrofida - va Gloucestershire Masalan, 1813 yilda mavjud bo'lgan 13 ta qo'shindan faqat Gloucester qo'shinlari 1815 yildan keyin politsiya sifatida xizmat qilish uchun saqlanib qolgan.[28][29][30]

Fuqarolik hokimiyatini qo'llab-quvvatlash

Painting of the Peterloo Massacre
Peterloo qirg'ini

Politsiya javobgar edi parish konstable va uning shahar hamkasbi qorovul homiyligida sudyalar. Shahar markazlari o'sishi bilan, jinoyatchilikning ko'payishi kabi vaqtinchalik choralar ko'rib chiqildi Maxsus so'zlashma. Ularning hech biri keng miqyosli tartibsizliklar bilan kurashish uchun etarli emas edi. Muntazam armiya intizomli va foydalanishga etarlicha ishonilgan bo'lsa-da, u juda kichik va juda keng tarqalgan bo'lib, samarali choralar ko'rishi mumkin edi va militsiya mahalliy kuch sifatida mavjud bo'lsa-da, unga ishonilmadi. Shu sababli, fuqarolik tartibsizliklarini engish uchun yeomaniya tushdi va natijada tez orada ularning soni ko'paytirildi.[31]

Napoleondan keyingi urushlar

Tomonidan konstitutsiyaviy islohot uchun tashviqot Radikal harakat Napoleonning mag'lubiyatidan keyin yeomraniyani tez-tez ishlatib turishiga olib keldi. Eng taniqli bo'lib, ular orasida 17 kishiga qadar odam halok bo'lgan va 650 kishi yaralangan Peterloo qirg'ini 1819 yil, qachon Manchester va Salford Yeomanri Manchesterdagi mitingda qatnashgan 60 ming kishilik olomonga qarshi ayblov.[32][33][b] 1820 yil 2 aprelda Stirlingshir Yeomanri chaqirildi Radikal urush - Shotlandiyadagi bir haftalik ish tashlashlar va tartibsizliklar - va uch kundan keyin uning Kilsit qo'shini muntazam armiyaga yordam berdi 10-gussarlar "Bonnymuir jangi" da 18 radikalni hibsga olishda.[35] Janubiy Uelsda zo'ravonlik paytida kollier 1822 yilgi ish tashlashlar, Monmut qo'shinlari Shotland Grey, ko'mir poezdlariga zarar etkazadigan olomonni tarqatish uchun qilichining tekisligidan foydalangan va bir necha kundan keyin ko'mir vagonlarini kuzatib borganida, kolterlar Chepstow Troop guruhini toshlar bilan urishgan. Boshqa joyda, Staffordshire Yeomanry mushkulotga murojaat qilib, bir kishini o'lik yarador qilib, u ishlayotgan kalyerlarni hayratda qoldiradigan hamkasblaridan himoya qilish uchun ishlatilganda.[36][37] Umuman olganda, 1822 yilda 19 ta alohida vaziyatda 12 xil korpusning yigitlari fuqarolik hokimiyatini qo'llab-quvvatlash uchun chaqirilgan va to'rt yil o'tib, 13 ta turli korpus 16 hodisada qatnashgan.[38]

Shlangi tartibsizliklar va siyosiy noroziliklar

Yordamga bo'lgan talab butun mamlakat bo'ylab bir xil emas edi va hatto 1820 yilda eng yuqori cho'qqisida, okruglarning 30 foizidan kamrog'i o'zlarining xayrixohligini chaqirgan edi. 1820-yillarda fuqarolik tartibsizliklari pasayib ketdi va 1827 yilda mahalliy magistratlar yeomraniyani olti marta chaqirishdi, 1820 yilga nisbatan 90 foizga kamaydi.[39] Borgan sari keraksiz deb topgan kuchni moliyalashtirishga duch kelgan hukumat yeomaniya tizimini iqtisodiy sabablarga ko'ra kamaytirdi. O'sha paytda mavjud bo'lgan 62 korpus yoki polkdan oldingi o'n yil ichida, avvalambor Angliyaning janubiy grafliklaridan fuqarolik hokimiyatiga yordamga chaqirilmagan 24 kishini tarqatib yuborishdi. Qolgan 38 korpus saqlanib qoldi, ammo ularning 16tasiga faqat o'z mablag'lari hisobidan ishlashga ruxsat berildi. Biroq, janubiy okruglarda Swing tartibsizliklari 1830 yilda boshlanib, asosan qishloq xo'jaligi noroziligi natijasida shaharda ham, qishloqda ham texnika yo'q qilindi. Natijada, ko'plab tarqatib yuborilgan korpuslar tirilib, yangilarini ko'tarishdi, garchi bu jarayon sust bo'lsa ham va qisqartirilishdan omon qolgan yeomaniya korpusi talabga ega edi. Masalan, Wiltshire Yeomanry ko'plab xizmatlarini e'tirof etgan holda "Royal" prefiksiga ega bo'lib, qo'shni davlatlarda ham o'z hududlarida xizmat qilgan. Ushbu polk tartibsizliklar paytida yeomaniya tomonidan o'limga olib kelgan bir kishining o'limiga sabab bo'lgan, uning Hindon qo'shinlari "Pythouse jangida" 500 kishilik qishloq xo'jaligi ishchilariga qarshi kurashgan. Tisberi, Uiltshir, 1830 yil 25-noyabrda.[37][40][41]

Mag'lubiyatga uchraganidan keyin siyosiy islohotlarni qo'zg'atishi bilan qo'zg'atilgan qo'zg'olon qo'zg'olonidan bir yil o'tib yana fuqarolik tartibsizliklari yuz berdi Ikkinchi islohot to'g'risidagi qonun loyihasi ichida Lordlar palatasi. Uelsda Glamorgan Yeomanry konchilar va po'lat ishlab chiqaruvchilar ishg'ol qilganlarida, ikki marta xo'rlik va natijada, ko'p o'tmay tarqatib yuborilgan Merthyr Tydfil; bir guruh yeomenlar shaharga yo'l olmoqchi bo'lganlarida, pistirmada va qurolsizlanishda bo'lganlar, alohida vaziyatda boshqa bir guruh tor-mor qilingan. Xuddi shu qadar samarasiz, garchi bu safar uning aybi yo'q bo'lsa-da, yangi tiklanganlar guruhi edi Gloucestershire Yeomanry. Bu yuborilgan Bristol qachon tartibsizlik u erda kuzda paydo bo'lgan, ammo shaharga joylashtirilgan doimiy kuchlar qo'mondoni etib kelganidan ko'p o'tmay ketishni buyurgan.[42][43] Keyinchalik Gloucestershire yeomanry guruhiga yeomenlar qo'shildi Somerset va Uiltshir g'alayondan keyin tartibni tiklashga yordam berish.[44]

Chartistlarning buzilishi

Drawing of a Chartist riot
Yomonlik qarama-qarshiliklarga olib kelishi mumkinligidan qo'rqib, yangi paydo bo'lgan politsiya kuchlari, agar mavjud bo'lsa, xartistlar tartibsizliklari paytida tartibni saqlash uchun afzalroq foydalanilgan.

Garchi 1830-yillarda shahar tartibsizliklari tufayli yeomaniya joylashtirildi Montgomeryshir, Kent va Birmingem, hukumat 1838 yilda xarajatlar asoslari bo'yicha yana bir marta qisqartirishni qonun bilan e'lon qildi va 18300 kishilik kuchni 4700 gacha qisqartirdi, ammo to'qqiz korpusga ish haqi bermasdan davom ettirishga ruxsat berildi.[45][46] 1827 yildagidek, vaqt juda achinarli edi va ko'tarilish Xartizm 1837-1842 yillarda shimoliy va Midlend harbiy okruglari qo'mondonlariga Ichki ishlar vazirligiga ruxsat olish uchun murojaat qilish o'rniga uni to'g'ridan-to'g'ri chaqirish imkoniyati berilganligi sababli, yeomanyaga ko'proq talablar paydo bo'ldi. Eng katta bosim 1842 yilda sodir bo'ldi - bu yil to'qqizta to'lanmagan korpusdan oltitasi yana ish joyiga qaytib keldi va 1000 nafar yangi yigitlar ishga qabul qilindi - 15 ingliz, uels va shotland okruglarida fuqarolik tartibsizligi 18 korpusdan 84 qo'shinni joylashtirishni talab qilganda; ular o'rtasida jami 338 kunlik ish haqi to'plangan.[47]

Qattiqqo'llik bilan qilinganiga qaramay, kuch kamdan kam qo'llanildi va yeomaniya iloji boricha asosiy agent sifatida emas, balki boshqa huquqni muhofaza qilish idoralarini qo'llab-quvvatlash uchun zaxira sifatida joylashtirildi. 1838 yilda Yorkshire Yeomanry guruhi Shimoliy Midland temir yo'lida jiddiy tartibsizlik paytida ularning mavjud bo'lishi vaziyatni qo'zg'atishi mumkinligidan qo'rqib ushlab turildi. Keyingi yil, janob Charlz Napier, komandiri shimoliy harbiy okrug, magistrlik bo'yicha magistratlarning so'roviga "agar chartistlar jang qilishni xohlasalar, ular kesish va kesish uchun haddan tashqari g'ayratli Yeomensiz rohatlanishlari mumkin" deb javob berishdi.[48] Zo'ravon to'qnashuvlar kabi kuch ishlatilgan holatlar bo'lgan Staffordshire kulolchilik idishlari va Shimoliy Uels 1839 yilda namoyishchilar va yeomenlar o'rtasida Staffordshire, Shropshir va Montgomeryshir; namoyishchilar orasida har ikki tomondan ham jarohatlar bo'lgan va kamida to'rt kishi o'lgan.[49]

Odatiy so'z sifatida foydalanishning kamayishi

Fuqarolik hokimiyatini qo'llab-quvvatlash uchun 1818 yildan 1855 yilgacha bo'lgan davrda yeomaniya birliklari o'rtacha yiliga taxminan 26 kun davomida navbatchilik qilishgan.[50] Bu 19-asrda kontseptsiya sifatida mavjud bo'lib qoldi, agar boshqa sababsiz magistratlar uchun yagona imkoniyat bo'lgan bo'lsa ham, uning mavjudligi ziddiyatni kuchaytirishi mumkinligi tan olingan bo'lsa ham. Ammo bu rolda uning ishlatilishi pasayib ketdi va fuqarolik hokimiyatini qo'llab-quvvatlash uchun so'nggi ma'lum qilish 1885 yilda sodir bo'ldi.[51] Kamayib borayotgan talab katta miqyosdagi norozilik namoyishlarining kamayishi va huquqni muhofaza qilishning yaxshi imkoniyatlari bilan ta'minlandi. 19-asr o'rtalaridan milliy temir yo'l tarmog'ining rivojlanishi muntazam kuchlarni tezkor ravishda joylashtirishga imkon berdi va politsiya kuchlarini tashkil etish 1856 yilga kelib barcha okruglarda magistrlarga yeomeniyaga qaraganda yaxshiroq alternativa berildi.[52]

1892 yilda Brownlow Yeomanyaning moliyaviy va harbiy holatini tekshirish uchun tuzilgan qo'mita, uning konstitutsiyasini uy mudofaasi uchun maxsus moslashtirishni tavsiya qildi va 1907 yilda rasmiylar fuqarolik hokimiyatiga yordam berishdagi har qanday rollardan ozod qilindi. A qo'mitani tanlang 1908 yilda hisobot, Tartibsiz holatlarda harbiy xizmatga jalb qilish, fuqarolik tartibsizligiga fuqarolik munosabatini rag'batlantirdi. Shu bilan birga, u o'rnatilgan kuchlarning qiymatini tan oldi va politsiya boshliqlariga yeomaniya tajribasiga ega bo'lgan erkaklarni vaqtincha yollash qobiliyatini saqlab qolish tavsiya etildi, shuning uchun oddiy qonunga bo'ysunadigan oddiy fuqarolar safiga qo'shilgan yeomenlar. Huquqni muhofaza qilish organlarining rivojlanishi evolyutsiyasini hukumatning javoblariga javoban ko'rish mumkin Tonypandy tartibsizliklari va "Liverpul" ning umumiy transport ish tashlashi 1910 va 1911 yillarda tartibni tiklash uchun muntazam armiya ishga tushirilganda yeomaniya hech qanday rol o'ynamagan, avvalgi holatda 500 tomonidan qo'llab-quvvatlangan Metropolitan politsiyasi.[53][54]

Milliy mudofaadagi roli

Painting of a yeomanry troop
19-asr oxiridagi Yeomanriya otliqlari

1850 yilda, Genri Fits Xardinge Berkli, Bristolning deputati, parlamentdagi yeomeniyani "katta xarajatlar evaziga saqlanmoqda; tinchlikda ayblov, urushda zaif mudofaa" deb istehzo qildi.[55][56] 1891 yilga kelib, kuch zarar ko'rdi Eirlining grafligi - o'sha paytda yordamchi bo'lgan tajribali otliq zobit Xempshir Carabiniers va keyinchalik kimni o'ldirish kerak edi 12-Lancers Janubiy Afrikada - maqsad va mashg'ulot etishmasligidan.[57] Uning konstruktiv vazifalari susaygach, yeomaniya 1860 va 1892 yillarda hech qanday haqiqiy rolsiz qoldi. Harbiy jihatdan zaif va ularning soni kam bo'lib, uning milliy mudofaa kuchi sifatida samaradorligi va ahamiyati tobora ko'proq shubha ostiga qo'yildi.[58] Bu, hech bo'lmaganda a'zolarning o'zlari orasida engil yoki yordamchi otliqlar deb qaraldi va yeomaniya polklari unvonlarini qabul qildilar hussarlar, ajdarholar va qarzdorlar. Ular to'xtab turish paytida murakkab muntazam otliq mashqlarni mashq qilgan mashqlari qilichdan foydalanishni ta'kidladi.[59] Hukumat tomonidan o'qotar qurollardan foydalanishni malakasini oshirishga qaratilgan sa'y-harakatlari ko'payganiga qaramay, bu otliqlar roli g'oyasi bilan bog'liq edi.[60]

Yeomaniya 1863 yildagi yangi boshqariladigan ko'ngillilar to'g'risidagi qonunga ta'sir qilmasdan qoldi Ko'ngillilar kuchi 1804 yilda qabul qilingan qonunchilikka bo'ysungan holda, uni boshqarish uslubiga ba'zi o'zgarishlar kiritilgan bo'lsa ham.[61][62] Yomg'irning holati va rolini baholashga harakat qilgan bir qator qo'mitalarda yanada jiddiy o'zgarishlar ko'rib chiqildi va 1861 yildagi Lawrenson qo'mitasi hech narsaga erishmagan bo'lsa-da, 1870 yilda tashkilotga ba'zi o'zgarishlar kiritildi. Edvard Kardvell, Urush bo'yicha davlat kotibi. To'rt kishidan kam bo'lgan mustaqil qo'shinlar va korpuslar tugatildi va belgilangan kuch 36 ta polkga o'rnatildi va asosiy tayyorgarlik va mashq qilish talablari qo'yildi. Bundan tashqari, Kardvell yeomeniyani otliq askarlardan o'rnatilgan miltiqlarga aylantirishga umid qilganligi haqida dalillar mavjud va bunga urinish 1882 yilda ham amalga oshirilgan, ammo ikkalasi ham hech narsaga erishmagan.[63] 1875 yildagi Stenli qo'mitasi ikki yillik ketma-ket 200 kishidan kam kuchga ega bo'lgan yeomriya rahbariyati va polklarni tarqatib yuborish uchun yaxshiroq o'qitishni tavsiya qildi. Birinchisi amalga oshirilgan bo'lsa-da, ikkinchisiga e'tibor berilmadi.[64]

19-asrning ikkinchi yarmidagi mashg'ulotlar ko'proq o'rnatilgan narsalarga qaratilgan razvedka, yon tomondan himoya qilish va piketlar, an'anaviy otliq askarlar tomonidan o'zlarining qadr-qimmati ostida bo'lgan mashg'ulotlar, lekin bu kamdan-kam hollarda real edi va yeomaniya mushketizm standartlarini joriy etishga chidamli edi.[65][66] Braunlou qo'mitasi yeomaniya uchun xalqning safarbarlik sxemasiga kiritish orqali yanada professional rolni aniqlashga intildi. Natijada, 1893 yilda polklar tomonidan tashkil etilgan otryad qo'shinlardan ko'ra va kuchsiz polklar brigadalarga birlashtirildi. Quroldan foydalanishni rag'batlantirishning yana bir urinishida, mushakbozlik mahoratini ma'lum darajada egallaganlarga nafaqalar oshirildi, ammo ketma-ket ikki yilda bunga erisha olmaganlar chiqarib yuboriladi.[67] Shunga qaramay, yeomanyaning davom etishi, uning milliy mudofaa kuchi sifatida foydaliligiga qaraganda, parlamentdagi muhim vakolatiga ko'proq ta'sir ko'rsatdi, bu unga o'z sonidan tashqarida siyosiy ta'sir ko'rsatdi.[68][c] Braunlou qo'mitasi tomonidan kiritilgan o'zgarishlar edi Genri Kempbell-Bannerman, rahbari Liberal partiya keyin qarama-qarshi bo'lib, yeomanyaning mavjudligini oqlash uchun so'nggi imkoniyat.[67]

Imperial Yeomanry

Photograph of an imperial yeoman in South Africa
Imperial yeoman

1899 yilga kelib yeomaniya eng past nuqtada edi. Bu 1794 yilda tashkil topganidan buyon sodir bo'lgan voqealar ta'sir ko'rsatmagan kichik kuch edi, qiymati va noaniq foydasi bor edi. Bu paytida doimiy kuchlarda katta muvaffaqiyatsizliklar yuz berdi Ikkinchi Boer urushi yeomaniyani dolzarbligini tiklash uchun.[69] 1899 yil oktyabr va noyabr oylarida podpolkovnik A. G. Lukas, yeomraniyaning urush idorasidagi vakili va Sadoqatli Suffol Xussarlari, yeomani Janubiy Afrikada mustahkamlash manbai sifatida taklif qildi. Dastlab uning taklifi rad etildi, ammo halokatli voqealar Qora hafta dekabr oyida Britaniya armiyasi ketma-ket uchta mag'lubiyatga uchragan, qayta ko'rib chiqishga undagan va 1900 yil 2-yanvarda Imperial Yeomanry yaratilgan.[70] Bu uy xo'jaliklari xizmatidan faqat Buyuk Britaniyada xizmat ko'rsatishni cheklashdan xoli bo'lgan alohida tashkilot bo'lib, kompaniyalar va batalyonlar otryadlarga emas, balki o'rnatilgan piyoda qo'shin roliga xiyonat qilib, eskadronlar va polklardan ko'ra.[71][72]

Urushning oxiriga kelib, Imperial Yeomanryada 34 mingga yaqin ko'ngillilar xizmat qilishdi, ammo ularning 12 foizdan ko'prog'i mahalliy yeomanyadan jalb qilingan edi.[73][74] Janubiy Afrikadagi tajriba hokimiyatni o'rnatilgan kuchning qiymatiga ishontirdi va 1901 yildagi Militsiya va Yeomaniya to'g'risidagi qonunga ta'sir qildi. Qonun yeomraniyani o'zgartirib, uni o'zgartirdi blokda Imperial Yeomanryga, otliqlardan tortib piyoda askarlarga qadar, qilichni miltiq va süngü bilan yeomanning asosiy quroliga almashtirdi. Bu xaki formasini joriy etdi, standart to'rt otryadli tashkilotni tayinladi va har bir polkga pulemyot uchastkasini qo'shdi.[75][76] Yomg'irlar qilichni iste'foga chiqarishga va "otliqlar" ni unvonidan mahrum qilishga qarshi turdilar, bu o'z intilishlarining aksi va otliqlarning roli haqida kengroq bahs-munozaralar.[77][d]

Hududiy kuch

Bur urushi ochib bergan asosiy masala yordamchi kuchlarning inqiroz davrida muntazam armiyani kuchaytirish qobiliyatiga tegishli edi. 1903 yilda Bosh safarbarlik va harbiy razvedka direktori uy mudofaasi kuchlarining haddan tashqari ko'pligi haqida xabar berdi, ular chet elda xizmat qilish uchun javobgar bo'lmaganliklari sababli ekspeditsiya kuchlarini xorijiy kampaniyalarda kengaytirish uchun ishlatilishi mumkin emas edi.[81] Bu 20-asrning birinchi o'n yilligidagi harbiy islohotlar atrofidagi munozaralarning katta qismini egallab oldi va yeomeniyalarga o'zini juda zaif muntazam otliqlar tarkibiga yarim tayyor zaxira sifatida joylashtirib, otliq rolini saqlab qolish imkoniyatini berdi. Bu 1902 va 1905 yillarda Imperial Yeomanyaga berilgan o'quv yo'riqlariga o'zgartirish kiritishda aks etdi. Birinchisi yeomeniyani otliq roliga intilmaslik haqida ogohlantirdi va yeomenlar va piyoda askarlar o'rtasida farq qilmadi, ammo ikkinchisi shunchaki an'anaviy otliqlarni ta'qiqladi. yeomeniyani otliqlar bilan moslashtirishda zarba ta'sirining taktikasi.[82]

Mashg'ulotdagi e'tiborning o'zgarishiga oltita yeomriya polkini oddiy armiyada divizion otliqlar sifatida ajratish rejalari sabab bo'ldi, bu esa Imperial Yeomaniya tarkibida chet elda xizmat cheklovlarisiz yeomanlarning alohida sinfini tashkil qildi.[83] Biroq, bu bunday xizmat uchun ixtiyoriy bo'lgan erkaklarga bog'liq edi va doimiy armiyaga etarli miqdordagi erkaklar buni qilishiga kafolat bermadi. Ko'ngillilarning etarli bo'lishi, agar ular zaxira rolida samarali bo'lishlari uchun zarur deb hisoblangan olti oylik mashg'ulotlarda fuqarolik hayotidan voz kechish talablari bilan shubhalanayotgan bo'lsa. Natijada, rejalar endi "Imperial" prefiksisiz ko'ngilli kuchlar va yeomraniyani birlashtirgan yakuniy qonunchilikdan yagona, birlashgan yordamchi tashkilotga, ya'ni Hududiy kuch, 1908 yilda.[84][e][f] Yomidalik alohida-alohida muassasa bo'lishni to'xtatdi va bitta yomoni aytganidek, "ko'ngillilar bilan yonboshladi".[88]

Ishga qabul qilish

Chart showing yeomanry recruitment figures 1805–1905
Ta'sirchan (vakolatli) va samarali (haqiqiy) kuchni ko'rsatadigan 1805-1905 yillardagi ayollarni yollash. Buzilgan chiziqlar ma'lum ma'lumotlar nuqtalari o'rtasida mavjud bo'lgan ma'lumotlarni bildirmaydi.

19-asrning birinchi yarmida korpuslar soni va umumiy kuchlar hukumat militsiya kuchi sifatida yeomanyaga ishonishini va uni moliyalashtirishga tayyorligini aks ettiruvchi fuqarolik tartibsizliklari bilan bir qatorda o'zgarib turdi.[89] Peterloo yeomeniyaning ko'p jihatdan obro'sini to'kdi, ammo bu Napoleon urushlari tugagandan so'ng amalga oshirilgan qisqartirishlarni bekor qilib, ishga yollanishning kuchayishiga turtki berdi. 1820 yilga kelib, yeomaniya tashkiloti urush davridagi eng yuqori darajaga ko'tarilib, taxminan 36000 kishini tashkil etdi, ammo uning samarali kuchi bu raqamdan 6000 ga kam edi. Xuddi shu tsikl 1820-yillarning oxirida takrorlanib, 10 yillik siyosiy barqarorlikdan so'ng hukumat yeomanyani 8350 dan 10.700 kishiga kamaytirdi,[g] faqat 1830-yillarda Swing isyonlari boshlanganidan keyin uni yana oshirish uchun. Yeomaniya kuchi ushbu tsiklda 1835 yilda 19,365 samarali kuchga erishdi.[92]

1838 yilda hukumat tomonidan amalga oshirilgan qisqartirishlar xartist tartibsizliklari boshlanganidan keyin yana bir bor bekor qilindi va samarali kuch 1845 yilda 15249 kishida yana avjiga chiqdi. Keyinchalik raqamlar yana bir bor pasayib ketdi va garchi ular 19-asrning o'rtalarida bosqinchilik qo'rquvi bilan kuchaygan bo'lsa-da, fuqarolik hokimiyatini qo'llab-quvvatlashda yeomaniya roli pasayganligi sababli umumiy pasayish boshlandi. 1900 yilga kelib, yeomaniya tashkiloti 12000 dan oshiqroq bo'lib, haqiqiy kuch bilan bu ko'rsatkichdan 2000 ga kam bo'lgan.[92] Ikkinchi Boer urushi paytida g'ayrat to'lqini yeomaniyaning hajmini ikki baravar oshirdi va 1901 yildagi Militsiya va Yeomaniya qonuni 35000 tashkil qildi, ammo samarali kuch atigi 25000 atrofida edi. Ushbu raqamlarga erishish uchun 18 ta yangi polk ko'tarildi, ulardan 12 tasi tarqatib yuborilgan 19-asr korpusidan tirildi.[93]

Ofitserlar korpusi

Yeomaniya ofitserlar korpusidagi komissiya 1892 yildagi qo'shin sardori uchun yiliga o'rtacha 60 funt sterling (2019 yilda 6573 funt sterlingga teng) bo'lgan nafaqani o'z ichiga oladi. Ushbu xarajatlar tayinlanish uchun moliyaviy malakani oshirdi va bunday lavozimlarni elitaning saqlovchisiga aylantirdi. Yomg'irlik rahbariyatining ulushi, uning mavjud bo'lgan davridagi sakkizdan o'n besh foizigacha bo'lgan qismini dvoryanlar tashkil etgan bo'lsa, ofitserlar jalb qilingan asosiy demografik tarkib quruq erlar edi.[94] Jamiyatdagi boylik va pozitsiyaning tasodifiyligi yeomaniya rahbariyatida aks etdi. Masalan, 1850 yilda ofitserlar korpusining 31 foizi magistratlar bo'lgan va yana 14 foizi lord yoki leytenant o'rinbosari sifatida yanada katta vakolatlarga ega edilar va keyinchalik xizmat qilgan 828 yeomaniya zobitlari tarkibiga 5 lord leytenant, 111 leytenant o'rinbosari, 255 Tinchlik odillari, 65 Parlament a'zolari va oldingi harbiy tajribaga ega 93 zobit.[95] Ushbu element vaqt o'tishi bilan ozgina o'zgardi va 1914 yilda xizmat qilgan elita soni amalda 1850 yilga teng edi.[96]

Painting of a yeomanry officer in 1834
Kapitan Surman, sobiq10-qirol gussalari, Gloucestershire Hussars qirolining yordamchisi 1834–1858.[97]

Ijtimoiy mavqei ba'zi hollarda komissiyalar uchun zarur shart bo'lgan bo'lsa-da, shaxsiy boylik ustun bo'lgan omil edi.[98] Okrug elitasiga kirish va boylikka ishtiyoq bilan yeomaniya ofitseri korpusi 'uchun yo'l ediyangi pul 'ijtimoiy maqom va mavqega ega bo'lish. Bu hatto dastlabki kunlarda ham aniq bo'lgan - Staffordshire Yeomanry tarkibida 1820 yilgacha sanoat va biznesning yangi boy zobitlari bor edi va ularning soni ortib borayotgani sababli 19-asr davomida yeomaniya komissiyalari orqali o'zlarining ijtimoiy mavqelarini ko'tarishdi.[99] Ofitserlarni yollashning yana bir mavzusi oilaviy an'ana edi. Masalan, Cherchilllar oilasi Qirolichaning Oksfordshir gussarlari 1818 yildan 1914 yilgacha, oxirgisi Uinston Cherchill, shu bilan birga eskadronga buyruq bergan Uy kotibi va keyinroq Admirallikning birinchi lordidir. Bofort gersoglari 1834 yilda tashkil topgandan 150 yil davomida Qirollik Gloucestershire Hussars bilan birga xizmat qilgan va polk polkovnigi yoki faxriy polkovnik bilan ta'minlangan.[100][101]

Kirishning yuqori to'siqlari ofitser nomzodlari havzasi cheklanganligini anglatadi va yeomaniya doimiy ravishda etarli zobitlarni topish uchun kurashgan.[102] Topilganlar ba'zan shubhali ahamiyatga ega edi. Zobitlar har doim ham o'zlarining hayajonli vazifalarida qatnasha olmas edilar, chunki ular juda uzoq yashaganliklari sababli yoki Uinston Cherchill singari o'z vaqtlariga nisbatan talablari yanada yuqori bo'lgan. 1875 yilda inspektor ofitser qo'shinlar etakchiligidagi samarasizlikdan shikoyat qildi, ammo o'sha yili yeomaniya zobitlari uchun majburiy rasmiy mashg'ulotlarning kiritilishi masalani yaxshilamadi. Lord Chesham, Ikkinchi Boer urushi paytida Janubiy Afrikadagi Imperial Yeomanry bosh inspektori, 1904 yilda ushbu mojaro paytida yeomaniya zobitlarining sifatsizligi haqida gapirdi.[103] Rag'batlantirish, zobitning jamiyatda ham, polkda ham ustunligini va uning roliga xizmat qilishidan ko'ra, ikkinchisiga vaqt va pul sarflash qobiliyatining ko'rsatkichi edi.[104]

Professionallikning bir elementi sobiq oddiy armiya zobitlari tomonidan ta'minlangan bo'lib, ular 1876 yilda zobitlar korpusining 23 foizini va 1914 yilda 14 foizini tashkil qilgan.[105] Bundan tashqari, har bir korpusda o'qitish va ma'muriyat an boshchiligidagi doimiy xodimlar tomonidan nazorat qilingan yordamchi kamida to'rt yillik muntazam harbiy tajribaga ega.[h] Hatto o'sha paytda ham ijtimoiy holat yordamchilarni tanlashda tez-tez omil bo'lib turar edi va to'g'ridan-to'g'ri polk polkovnikiga arizalar berilganda, tayinlash uchun okrug ta'sirining chorasi talab qilinardi.[107]

Reyting va fayl

Photograph of yeomanry sergeants in the late 19th century
Gloucestershire Hussars yeomanry serjantlari

1889 yilda bir deputat yeomeniyani "ijarachilar dalaga erlari ergashgan kunlardan omon qolish" deb ta'riflagan.[108] 1893 yil oxirlarida bir qator oddiy xodimlar ijaraga olish sharti sifatida xizmat qilishlari shart bo'lganligi haqida dalillar mavjud. Ammo, umuman, uy egalari majburlashga qodir emas yoki hech bo'lmaganda iroda qilmagan. o'z ixtiyori bilan xizmat qilgan yoki xizmat ko'rsatishdan bosh tortgan ijarachi. Agar okrug elitasi bu masalada biron bir ta'sir o'tkazishni buyurgan bo'lsa, bu, odatda, 19-asr Britaniyasining sinflar tomonidan boshqariladigan jamiyatida bo'ysunishga emas, balki hurmat qilish sharoitida bo'lgan.[109][men]

Garchi dehqonlar oddiy va oddiy demografik ko'rsatkichlarni namoyish etgan bo'lsalar-da, statistika shuni ko'rsatadiki, 1817-1915 yillar orasida yeomalarning deyarli yarmi fermerlar jamoasidan tashqarida yollangan. Other demographics appearing in the albeit incomplete data were merchants (4.9 per cent), professionals (5.6 per cent), small businessmen (14.9 per cent), artisans (13.5 per cent) and skilled or unskilled labourers (4.9 per cent).[j] In some cases the ratio of farmers within the same corps varied over time, an example being the Ayrshire Yeomanry, which comprised over 81 per cent farmers and their sons in 1831, a number which dropped to just over 60 per cent by 1880. The 1st Devon Yeomanry, on the other hand, shows largely unchanged ratios for the years 1834 (44.7 per cent) and 1915 (40.2 per cent). The ratios also varied between corps; for example, over 76 per cent of the Lanarkshire Yeomanry (Upper Ward) between 1822 and 1826 were farmers, but the Manchester and Salford Yeomanry of 1819 contained none.[112]

The early appearance of the Manchester and Salford Yeomanry demonstrates an urban theme in yeomanry recruitment that became more marked as the 19th century progressed, influenced to some extent by an agricultural downturn in the late-19th century. Aksincha Lanarkshir 's Upper Ward regiment, its Glazgo and Lower Ward regiment, raised in 1848 and later to become the Qirolichaning o'zining Royal Glasgow Yeomanry, was recruited from the city's middle classes.[113][114] 1860-yillarda Leestershire Yeomanry and the South Salopian Yeomanry (Shropshire) were both recruiting from towns in their territories, and by 1892 all but one troop of the Middlesex Yeomanry were recruited in London.[115] The urban element was not without its own issues of class. The rank and file of the Edinburgh Troop in the 1830s consisted mainly of gentlemen who were charged £12 (equivalent to £1,082 in 2019) to join, and the commander of the Middlesex Yeomanry's B Troop, which was known as the gentlemen's troop, believed there would be class friction if it was forced by the new squadron system of 1893 to join a troop of lesser status.[116]

The increasing use of hired mounts, particularly after the turn of the century, also indicates a dilution of the rural contingent in the rank and file. The percentage of horses that were hired rose dramatically, from up to 14 per cent in the last quarter of the 19th century to around 50 per cent in the period 1905–1907. Although this was a predictable trend in the case of, for example, the largely urban-recruited Middlesex Yeomanry, the more rurally-based East Kent Yeomanry experienced a progressive decline in the ownership of horses, from 76 per cent in 1880 to 66 per cent in 1884 and a little over a half in 1894.[117]

Ommabop idrok

Caricature of the yeomanry at the Peterloo Massacre
The Massacre of Peterloo by caricaturist Jorj Kruikshank

Peterloo polarised opinions in the press, the Radical outlets framing it in terms of murder and massacre and the establishment outlets tending more to a defence of the yeomanry. Although an extreme episode, the events at St. Peter's Field coloured perceptions of the yeomanry among the politically-involved working class, who equated it with the abuse of civil power. Negative perceptions persisted long after the event, even in the upper echelons of society, and as late as 1850 Peterloo was referenced when the yeomanry's "inclinations" were criticised in Parliament.[32][118] In the mainstream national press, however, as Peterloo became yesterday's news, so too did the yeomanry, and, outside of public events which it attended in a ceremonial role, it was seldom reported on. More often, the yeomanry was the subject of karikatura, in which yeomen were portrayed as old, incompetent and waving blood-stained weapons. Caricature evolved into satira kabi jurnallar Punch regularly ridiculed the force as the epitome of bumbling high society, with overweight yeomen unable to master their weapons or the sick, undersized horses they rode. Common themes in the portrayal of the yeomanry in books and on stage included amateurs with delusions of grandeur, social climbing, self-importance and a greater concern for leisure and appearance than national defence.[119]

The yeomanry's less confrontational activities resulted in a more positive interaction with the general public. It was often generous in its support for local charities, and its gatherings, whether for training or social events, injected wealth into local economies, to the extent that towns would petition regiments to be selected as venues for such occasions.[120][121] Sporting events and pageantry, particularly the many occasions on which the yeomanry escorted royalty and visiting dignitaries, also drew appreciative crowds. Ning taqdimoti ranglar to the Wiltshire Yeomanry in 1798, for example, was watched by over 20,000 spectators, yeomanry bands entertained visitors at the opening of the Nottingem dendrariysi in 1852, and the Royal Midlothian Yeomanry Cavalry Races in 1863 attracted a considerable attendance.[7][122]

Although the political allegiance of yeomanry MPs in the House of Commons was fairly evenly split between the two main parties by the early 20th century, this was after a gradual shift in political affiliations since 1843, when the ratio of politically active members of the yeomanry was significantly Tori.[123][k] Satirik cast the yeomanry as "ultra Tories" in 1838, and the perception of the force as an instrument of the Tory establishment made some local authorities cautious in its use against political reformers during the Chartist disturbances.[124] In terms of the yeomanry leadership at least, the nature of the reform movement in the first half of the 19th century meant that the yeomanry was regularly pitted against a different class, but it was called upon to do so by governments of both political parties. Furthermore, its membership was not without sympathies for the causes it was called upon to police, and there are a number of cases in the early 1830s where the loyalties of some of its corps were doubted.[125][126]

Funding, remuneration and terms of service

Drawing illustrating different yeomanry uniforms
Different uniforms of various yeomanry regiments c.1899

Yeomen had to provide their own horses, but saddlery and uniforms were paid for, either by the officers or by subscriptions in the counties in which the troops were raised, leading to a variety of colourful and flamboyant choices in attire. Their weapons – swords, pistols and a proportion of karbinalar per troop – were funded by the government.[127] Other than when called out for duty, when it would be paid as regular cavalry, the yeomanry received no remuneration until 1803, when the first allowances were granted. The confused legislation of the early 19th century meant that different corps, and even different troops within the same corps, operated under different terms and conditions until the Volunteer Consolidation Act of 1804 introduced some uniformity. It restricted pay to a maximum of 24 days per annum, set 12 days of training as the qualification for exemption from conscription into other auxiliary arms, offered bounties for active service and gave yeomen the right to resign on 14 days notice. It did not, however, amend the different areas of liability (military district or nationwide) set by previous legislation.[23][128][129] In 1816, the annual training requirement was reduced to eight days, inclusive of two days travelling, and the next year an annual allowance of £1 10s (equivalent to £106 in 2016) per yeoman was awarded to help with uniform and equipment costs.[90][130]

In addition to weapons and allowances, expenses incurred by the government in maintaining the yeomanry included the permanent staff, compensation for losses and injuries to men and horses, and pay at 7s per day for annual training and when called out.[131] Volunteers also benefitted by exemption from hair powder duty until 1869 and horse duty until 1874.[20][132] Between 1816 and 1821, the cost of maintaining the yeomanry had risen by nearly 46 per cent, and with only seven per cent of the total cost directly attributable to aiding the civil power in 1819, governments struggled to justify the expense.[90] Cuts to the force on economic grounds were legislated twice, in 1827 and 1838, saving £92,000 (equivalent to £7,971,800 in 2016) and £22,000 (equivalent to £2,079,600 in 2016) respectively.[133][130]

Government funding, however, consistently fell short of actual requirements. Subsidisation of the yeomanry by its members, particularly the officers, was common practice throughout its existence, and not only during those periods when corps were maintained at their own expense. Lord Plymouth paid £6,200 (equivalent to £596,922 in 2016) to equip a troop of Worcestershire Yeomanry in 1832, and the Dudli grafligi was reputed to have spent £4,000 (approximately equivalent to £400,000 in 2016) per year on the same corps between 1854 and 1871. The second Bukingem va Chandos gersogi was said to have been bankrupted in 1848 in part by the massive contribution he made to his regiment, which received no government funding between 1827 and 1830.[134] In 1882, it was calculated that officers paid an average of £20 each (equivalent to £2,029 in 2019) and the men up to £5 each (equivalent to £507 in 2019) towards the cost of their regiments, giving a total subsidy of £61,500 (equivalent to £6,239,810 in 2019) in a year when the government voted a £69,000 budget (equivalent to £7,103,584 in 2016) for the yeomanry.[135] Twenty years later, the annual cost of being a yeomanry officer was estimated to be £100 (equivalent to £10,936 in 2019) in excess of the pay and allowances received by the officer.[65] This willingness to support itself with private funding was another major factor in the yeomanry's survival after its usefulness in suppressing civil disorder disappeared.[136][130]

Changes were made to the yeomanry terms and conditions in the second half of the 19th century. The National Defence Act of 1888 made it liable to serve anywhere in the country, and four years later an annual capitation grant of £1 (equivalent to £107 in 2016) was awarded. However, the force remained largely subject to the terms set by the Volunteer Consolidation Act of 1804 until the passage of the Militia and Yeomanry Act in 1901.[137] The new legislation replaced the right to resign on 14 days' notice with a three-year term of service for new recruits; increased the annual training requirement to 18 days, 14 of which were compulsory; introduced a £3 allowance (equivalent to £300 in 2016) per man and grants of £20 (equivalent to £2,000 in 2016) and £30 (equivalent to £2,999 in 2016) for squadron and regimental stores; reduced duty pay to 5s 6d per day (equivalent to £27 in 2016), compensated for by extra daily allowances for travel, musketry practice, forage during permanent duty, and squadron drills, which in total amounted to an extra 10s 6d (equivalent to £52 in 2016); and introduced a £5 allowance (equivalent to £500 in 2016) for the hire of horses.[130]

The incorporation of the yeomanry into the Territorial Force in 1908 introduced further adjustments. Duty pay was reduced by 1s 2d per day, compensated for by free rations, a messing allowance of 1s per day was introduced and £1 was awarded for reaching a set standard of horsemanship. The new organisation also introduced some significant changes to the terms and conditions, including a four-year term of service and reducing annual camp to fifteen days, eight of which were necessary to gain a certificate of efficiency. The most fundamental change of all, however, was the transfer of administration from the regiments to the newly created County Territorial Associations. These were made responsible for the provision of horses, and relieved the officers of the burden and expense of maintaining the regiments.[138][139]

Meros

Lady Butler's painting of the cavalry charge at Huj
Quddus etkazib berildi tomonidan Lady Butler, depicting the 1/1st Warwickshire Yeomanry and 1/1st Queen's Own Worcestershire Hussars in one of the British Army's last cavalry charges at Huj.

Yeomanry regiments served overseas during the Birinchi jahon urushi, yilda Frantsiya, da Gallipoli, in Egypt and during the Sinay va Falastin kampaniyasi. The nature of the conflict in Europe precluded the use of mounted forces; cavalry actions were rare, and several regiments finished the war re-purposed as infantry. The same fate befell a number of yeomanry regiments posted to the Yaqin Sharq, although the yeomanry 2-chi divizion, having fought as infantry at Gallipoli, reverted to the cavalry role on its return to Egypt. Being more conducive to mounted operations, the Sinai and Palestine Campaign saw extensive use of the yeomanry, though it often fought dismounted. Some of the last ever cavalry charges conducted by the British Army were made by yeomanry regiments during the campaign, by the 1/1st Warwickshire Yeomanry and 1/1st Queen's Own Worcestershire Hussars in the Hujda zaryadlash on 8 November 1917, followed five days later with a charge by the 1/1st Royal Bucks Hussars ichida Mug'ar tizmasi jangi.[140]

In 1921, of the 56 yeomanry regiments active after the First World War, only 14 were retained in the cavalry role, while 16 were disbanded and the remainder converted to either batteries of the Qirollik dala artilleriyasi or armoured car companies of the Tank korpusi.[141] As with previous attempts to relieve the yeomanry of its cavalry role, a number of regiments resisted the change, concerned that the new roles would result at best in an unacceptable change to the unique character of the force and at worst wholesale resignations. Political lobbying succeeded only in increasing the number of regiments to be retained from the originally proposed ten.[142]

Photograph of a modern yeomanry tank
Challenger 2 tanki Royal Wessex Yeomanry, one of four regiments which preserve the yeomanry heritage in the 21st century.

The yeomanry saw active service during the Ikkinchi jahon urushi in armour, artillery, zenit va tankga qarshi rollar. Units fought in Europe during the Frantsiya jangi, Normandiya qo'nish va keyingi Shimoliy-G'arbiy Evropada kampaniya, in North Africa during the G'arbiy cho'l kampaniyasi, yilda Italiya and against Japanese forces in Singapur va Birma. Yeomanry regiments were also deployed in their traditional cavalry role to Falastin, though by 1941 only three regiments still retained their horses. The last action by British cavalry on horseback was fought on 10 July against Vichi frantsuzcha forces in Syria by the Qirolichaning o'ziga xos Yorkshir ajdarlari, which also had the distinction of being the last regiment on active service in the British Army to give up its horses.[143][144] Several post-war reorganisations resulted in more disbandments and the reduction of surviving regiments to cadres, leaving only the Royal Yeomanry, which performed an armoured reconnaissance role. In 1971 the cadres were restored to form three new yeomanry infantry regiments, and in the 21st century these were converted to armour-based roles alongside the Royal Yeomanry in the Qirollik zirhli korpusi.[145][146]

Shuningdek qarang

Izohlar

  1. ^ The Castlemartin Yeomanry's successor, the Pembrok Yeomaniya, taqdirlandi jang sharafi "Fishguard" in 1853. It is the only unit in the British Army to have been so recognised for battle on British soil.[17]
  2. ^ The casualties at Peterloo vary according to source. Beckett reports "some 400" injured, and Mileham "over 500", with both saying 11 killed. Hay's sources give figures of 17 killed and 650 injured.[32][33][34]
  3. ^ The numbers of yeomen serving in either the Jamiyat palatasi yoki Lordlar palatasi were: 1843 – 14; 1847 – 22; 1850 – 65 (some eight per cent of the yeomanry officer corps); 1852 – 52; 1870 – 66; 1882 – 74; and 1897 – 66 (with a further 18 former members of the yeomanry).[68]
  4. ^ Uchta polk qirolga paradda qilichni ushlab turishga ruxsat berishni iltimos qildi va 35 qo'mondonning biridan boshqasi 1902 yilda armiyani saqlab qolish to'g'risida iltimos qildi.[78] Polkovnik Lancelot Rolleston, qo'mondoni South Nottinghamshire Imperial Yeomanry, went further, and refused to surrender the regiment's swords on the grounds that the regulations permitted their use until the equipment was worn out, and even introduced the lance to the regiment in 1904. With some string-pulling, the regiment secured for itself a place in the Northern Command review in 1903, in which it drilled alongside the regular forces as cavalry and paraded without rifles.[79] The desire to retain the sword was not unanimous, and at an Army Council meeting in 1904 in which use of the sword was revisited, 21 of the now 55 yeomanry commanding officers were in favour of the bayonet. Demonstrating that the debate about the yeomanry role went on even within the yeomanry, their reasoning was that the force might be useful as mounted infantry or rifles, but it could never hope to become efficient cavalry.[80]
  5. ^ The difficulties inherent in relying on volunteers to reliably augment the regular army can be seen in the numbers, or more accurately the distribution of those who had done so by 1913. At just under 4,000, the quantity of volunteers exceeded the estimated requirements, but 88 per cent of them were distributed across 54 different regiments, making it too complex to integrate them into the regular forces.[85]
  6. ^ Chet el bosqinchiligiga qarshi mudofaa bilan bir qatorda, Hududiy kuch safarbarlik bo'yicha olti oylik mashg'ulotlardan so'ng xorijdagi doimiy armiyani kuchaytirishni maqsad qilgan. Biroq, kuch avvalgilariga o'xshab chet el xizmatiga nisbatan cheklovlarga duchor bo'lgan va shu sababli chet elga chiqish bu ish uchun ixtiyoriy bo'lgan a'zolarga to'liq bog'liq edi. Richard Xoldeyn, islohotlarni kiritgan urush bo'yicha davlat kotibi, oltinchi va to'rtdan bir qismi hududlar orasida bo'lishiga umid qildi. A'zolarning ko'ngilli ishtirok etishi jarayoni 1910 yilda imperatorlik xizmatining majburiyati sifatida rasmiylashtirildi.[86][87]
  7. ^ Sources do not agree on the exact scale of cuts made to the yeomanry in 1827. Beckett reports that the established strength fell from 24,288 to 10,705, while Hay reports that the yeomanry was reduced "by around" 21,332 to 8351 "in the ranks", without specifying whether he is referring to established or effective strength. Hay does add in a footnote that the values are approximate because in the period from 1821 to 1830, figures are available only for 1829.[90][91]
  8. ^ Two notable men who served as yeomanry adjutants were the future Bosh shtab boshlig'i, Jon frantsuz, who served with the Northumberland Hussars between 1881 and 1884, and Adrian Karton de Wiart, who was appointed adjutant to the Royal Gloucestershire Hussars in 1910.[106]
  9. ^ A small number of known estate clauses, dating largely from the first half of the 19th century, has given rise to a stereotype of a yeomanry rank and file forced to serve by landlords. More likely, it was a "softer paternalism" that motivated voluntary service by a deferential tenantry seeking to curry favour with landlords.[110]
  10. ^ Merchants sold or produced goods on a large scale, examples being grain merchants, warehousemen and manufacturers. Examples of professionals include lawyers, physicians, bankers, accountants, and also clerks. Small businessmen were innkeepers, hoteliers, butchers, grocers and tailors. Artisans provided a highly skilled service, examples being farriers, carpenters, masons and builders. Skilled labour included bricklayers, apprentices and machine operators, and unskilled labourers included agricultural, construction, mine and shop workers.[111]
  11. ^ In 1843, some 80 per cent of yeoman politicians were Konservativ, declining to 68 per cent in 1852 and around 50 per cent in 1870, and increasing only slightly in favour of the Conservatives by 1908.[123]

Adabiyotlar

  1. ^ Athawes pp. 1–3
  2. ^ a b Mileham 2003 pp. 8–10
  3. ^ Beckett 2011 pp. 69–73
  4. ^ Wyndham-Quin p. 7
  5. ^ Mileham 2003 p. 10
  6. ^ Mileham 2003 p. 11
  7. ^ a b v Bkett 2011 y. 76
  8. ^ Beckett 2011 pp. 75–76
  9. ^ Mileham 2003 pp. 10–12
  10. ^ a b Bkett 2011 y. 75
  11. ^ "The Royal Wiltshire Yeomanry (Prince of Wales's Own) [UK]". regiments.org. T. F. Mills. Arxivlandi asl nusxasi 2007 yil 23 oktyabrda. Olingan 28 dekabr 2017.
  12. ^ Mileham 2003 pp. 11–12
  13. ^ Wyndham-Quin p. 8
  14. ^ Beckett 2011 pp. 75–77
  15. ^ Mileham 2003 p. 12
  16. ^ Bkett 2011 y. 78
  17. ^ Mileham 2003 p. 106
  18. ^ Hay 2017 p. 141
  19. ^ Mileham 2003 pp. 12–13
  20. ^ a b Bkett 2011 y. 87
  21. ^ Beckett 2011 pp. 92–95
  22. ^ Bkett 2011 y. 92
  23. ^ a b Beckett 2011 pp. 101–102
  24. ^ Becket 2011 pp. 102–103
  25. ^ Beckett 2011 pp. 103–104
  26. ^ Athawes p. 18
  27. ^ Beckett 2011 pp. 107, 114 & 120
  28. ^ Beckett 2011 pp. 120–122
  29. ^ Wyndham-Quin pp. 68 & 73–74
  30. ^ Athawes p. 25
  31. ^ Hay 2017 pp. 4 & 138–140
  32. ^ a b v Bkett 2011 y. 135
  33. ^ a b Hay 2017 pp. 142–143
  34. ^ Mileham 2003 p. 16
  35. ^ Mileham 1985 Edition 253 p. 24 & Edition 254 pp. 104–105
  36. ^ Wyndham-Quin pp. 78–83
  37. ^ a b Mileham 2003 pp. 16–17
  38. ^ Bkett 2011 y. 140
  39. ^ Hay 2017 pp. 144–145 & 155
  40. ^ Beckett 2011 pp. 132–135
  41. ^ Hay 2017 pp. 145–149
  42. ^ Wyndham-Quin p. 91
  43. ^ Hay 2017 pp. 150–151
  44. ^ Bkett 2011 y. 139
  45. ^ Hay 2017 p. 156
  46. ^ Bkett 2011 y. 132
  47. ^ Beckett 2011 pp. 133 & 141
  48. ^ Hay 2017 pp. 156–158
  49. ^ Hay 2017 p. 159
  50. ^ Hay 2017 p. 169
  51. ^ Hay 2017 pp. 161–162
  52. ^ Hay 2017 pp. 162–163
  53. ^ Hay 2017 pp. 163–164
  54. ^ Bkett 2008 y. 29
  55. ^ Hay 2017 pp. 152–153
  56. ^ "Supply – Army Estimates (Hansard, 26 July 1850)". Xansard. 26 July 1850. p. 375. Olingan 20 yanvar 2018.
  57. ^ Hay 2017 p. 26
  58. ^ Hay 2017 pp. 30–31
  59. ^ Mileham 2003 pp. 20–22
  60. ^ Hay 2017 pp. 25–26 & 28
  61. ^ Bkett 2011 y. 188
  62. ^ Hay 2017 p. 21
  63. ^ Hay 2017 pp. 22, 24–25 & 220
  64. ^ Hay 2017 pp. 26 & 64–65
  65. ^ a b Bkett 2011 y. 189
  66. ^ Mileham 2003 p. 24
  67. ^ a b Hay 2017 pp. 27–28
  68. ^ a b Hay 2017 pp. 6–7
  69. ^ Hay 2017 p. 171 & 209
  70. ^ Beckett 2011 pp. 200 & 202–203
  71. ^ Hay 2017 pp. 173–174 & 205
  72. ^ Mileham 2003 p. 27
  73. ^ Bkett 2011 y. 203
  74. ^ Hay 2017 p. 173
  75. ^ Bkett 2011 yil 207–208 betlar
  76. ^ Hay 2017 p. 214
  77. ^ Hay 2017 pp. 214 & 216
  78. ^ Bkett 2011 y. 208
  79. ^ Hay 2017 p. 218
  80. ^ Hay 2017 p. 217
  81. ^ Hay 2017 pp. 220–221
  82. ^ Hay 2017 pp. 216 & 220
  83. ^ Hay 2017 pp. 222–224
  84. ^ Hay 2017 pp. 224–230
  85. ^ Hay 2017 pp. 238–239
  86. ^ Bkett 2011 y. 215
  87. ^ Bkett 2008 y. 32
  88. ^ Hay 2017 p. 232
  89. ^ Hay 2017 pp. 75–76
  90. ^ a b v Bkett 2011 y. 133
  91. ^ Hay 2017 p. 145
  92. ^ a b Hay 2017 pp. 4–5
  93. ^ Hay 2017 pp. 175, 213 & 215
  94. ^ Hay 2017 pp. 37–41 & 49–50
  95. ^ Hay 2017 pp. 49–50
  96. ^ Hay 2017 p. 71
  97. ^ Wyndham-Quin pp. 131–132
  98. ^ Hay 2017 pp. 41, 43–44, 58 & 71
  99. ^ Hay 2017 pp. 53–58
  100. ^ Hay 2017 pp. 47–48 & 63
  101. ^ Mileham 2003 pp. 86–87
  102. ^ Hay 2017 pp. 35–37, 47 & 50–51
  103. ^ Hay 2017 pp. 62–65
  104. ^ Hay 2017 p. 43
  105. ^ Hay 2017 p. 45
  106. ^ Hay 2017 p. 66
  107. ^ Hay 2017 pp. 65 & 70–71
  108. ^ Hay 2017 p. 76
  109. ^ Hay 2017 pp. 77–82
  110. ^ Hay 2017 p. 106
  111. ^ Hay 2017 p. 254
  112. ^ Hay 2017 pp. 83–86
  113. ^ Hay 2017 pp. 92–93
  114. ^ Mileham 2003 pp. 92–93
  115. ^ Hay 2017 p. 92
  116. ^ Hay 2017 p. 94
  117. ^ Hay 2017 pp. 93–94
  118. ^ Hay 2017 pp. 111–113
  119. ^ Hay 2017 pp. 113–118
  120. ^ Hay 2017 pp. 119–120, 123 & 127
  121. ^ Wyndham-Quin p. 172
  122. ^ Hay 2017 pp. 122 & 128–130
  123. ^ a b Hay 2017 pp. 8–9
  124. ^ Hay 2017 pp. 8 & 157
  125. ^ Beckett 2011 pp. 137–138
  126. ^ Hay pp. 168–170
  127. ^ Mileham 2003 pp. 10 & 23
  128. ^ Athawes pp. 9–10 & 24
  129. ^ Wyndham-Quin pp. 3–4
  130. ^ a b v d Birlashgan Qirollik Yalpi ichki mahsulot deflyatori raqamlar quyidagicha Qiymatni o'lchash "izchil ketma-ketliklar" taqdim etilgan Tomas, Ryland; Uilyamson, Samuel H. (2018). "U holda Buyuk Britaniyaning YaIM nima edi?. Qiymat. Olingan 2 fevral 2020.
  131. ^ Hay 2017 p. 17, 100 & 107
  132. ^ Hay 2017 p. 101
  133. ^ Hay 2017 p. 13
  134. ^ Beckett 2011 pp. 133–134
  135. ^ Hay 2017 pp. 19–20
  136. ^ Hay 2017 p. 119
  137. ^ Beckett 2011 pp. 188 & 207
  138. ^ Bkett 2008 y. 43
  139. ^ Hay 2017 pp. 107, 213 & 231
  140. ^ Mileham 2003 pp. 38–47
  141. ^ Hay 2016 pp. 37 & 39–40
  142. ^ Hay 2016 pp. 40–48
  143. ^ Mileham 2003 pp. 52–65, 118
  144. ^ Beckett 2008 pp. 141–142
  145. ^ Mileham 2003 pp. 66–68
  146. ^ Beckett 2008 pp. 69–70

Bibliografiya

  • Atxes, Piter D. (1994). Yeomaniya urushi: Yeomaniya tarixi, ko'ngillilar va ko'ngillilar uyushmasi otliqlari. 1794 yildan boshlab fuqarolik urf-odati. Aberdin: Shotlandiya madaniy matbuoti. ISBN  978-1898218029.
  • Bkett, Yan Frederik Uilyam (2008). Hududlar: xizmatning asrligi. Plimut: DRA nashriyoti. ISBN  978-0955781315.
  • Bkett, Yan Frederik Uilyam (2011). Britaniyaning yarim kunlik askarlari: Havaskorlar uchun harbiy an'ana: 1558–1945. Barsli, Janubiy Yorkshir: Qalam va qilich harbiy. ISBN  978-1848843950.
  • Hay, George (2016). "The Yeomanry Cavalry and the Reconstitution of the Territorial Army". Tarixdagi urush. 23 (1): 36–54. doi:10.1177/0968344514536704.
  • Hay, Jorj (2017). Buyuk Britaniyadagi Yeomani otliqlar va harbiy shaxslar, 1815–1914. London: Palgrave Macmillan. ISBN  978-3319655383.
  • Mileham, Patrick (1985). "The Stirlingshire Yeomanry Cavalry and the Scottish Radical Disturbances of April 1820". Armiya tarixiy tadqiqotlari jamiyati jurnali. LXIII (253): 20–30. JSTOR  44229635.
  • Mileham, Patrick (1985). "The Stirlingshire Yeomanry Cavalry and the Scottish Radical Disturbances of April 1820 (continued)". Armiya tarixiy tadqiqotlari jamiyati jurnali. LXIII (254): 104–112. JSTOR  44224358.
  • Milham, Patrik (2003). Yeomaniya polklari; 200 yildan ortiq an'analar. Staplehurst: Spellmount. ISBN  978-1862271678.
  • Wyndham-Quin, Henry (2005) [First published 1898]. Glouzestershir va Monmutning Yeomanyalar otliqlari (Faksiya tahriri). Wormbridge, Herefordshire: Golden Valley Publications. ISBN  978-0954257859.

Tashqi havolalar

  • Bilan bog'liq ommaviy axborot vositalari Yeomaniya Vikimedia Commons-da