Echo parakeet - Echo parakeet

Echo parakeet
Qushlarni boquvchi tomonidan o'tirgan yashil to'tiqushning fotosurati
Ayol tomonidan a oziqlantiruvchi bunker
Ilmiy tasnif tahrirlash
Qirollik:Animalia
Filum:Chordata
Sinf:Aves
Buyurtma:Psittaciformes
Oila:Psittaculidae
Tur:Psittakula
Turlar:
P. tenglashadi
Binomial ism
Psittakula tenglashadi
(Boddaert, 1783)
Subspecies
  • P. e. tengliklar (Boddaert, 1783)
  • P. e. aks sado (Nyuton & Nyuton, 1876)
Mavrikiy va Hind okeanidagi orolning joylashuvi ko'rsatilgan xarita
Joriy diapazon (qizil) in Mavrikiy
Sinonimlar

The echo parakeet (Psittakula tenglashadi) a turlari ning to'tiqush endemik uchun Maskarene orollari ning Mavrikiy va ilgari Reunion. Bu Maskarene orollarining yagona tirik to'tiqushidir; qolganlarning barchasi bo'ldi yo'q bo'lib ketgan inson faoliyati tufayli. Ikki pastki turlari yo'q bo'lib ketgan deb tan olindi Reunion parakeet (uzoq vaqt davomida faqat tavsif va illyustratsiyalarda ma'lum bo'lgan) va jonli echo parakeet, ba'zida Mauritius parakeet. Ikki aholi o'rtasidagi munosabatlar tarixiy jihatdan aniq emas edi, ammo 2015 yil DNK o'rganish ularni reunion paraketi deb o'ylangan bitta teri bilan echo parakeets DNK-ni taqqoslash orqali ularni bir xil turdagi kichik turlarini aniqladi. Birinchi bo'lib nomlanganidek, binomial ism turlar uchun Réunion parakeet ishlatiladi; shu tariqa Reunion pastki turi paydo bo'ldi P. tengliklarMavrikiyning pastki turlari esa P. tenglashadi. Ularning eng yaqin qarindoshi yo'q bo'lib ketgan Nyutonning paragi ning Rodriges va uchtasi .ning pastki turlari orasida birlashtirilgan atirgul halqali parraket (ular ajralib chiqqan) Osiyo va Afrikaning.

Echo parakeet uzunligi 34-42 sm (13-17 dyuym), vazni 167-193 g (5.9-6.8 oz) va qanotlari 49-54 sm (19-21 dyuym). Odatda yashil rangga ega (urg'ochi umuman quyuqroq) va bo'ynida ikkita yoqasi bor; erkakning bitta qora va bitta pushti yoqasi bor, va ayolning bitta yashil va bitta aniq bo'lmagan qora yoqasi bor. Yuqori qonun loyihasi erkakning qizil va pastki qora jigarrang; ayolning yuqori qismi qora. Ko'z atrofidagi teri to'q sariq, oyoqlari esa kulrang. Voyaga etmaganlar qizil-to'q sariq rangga ega bo'lib, ulardan keyin qora rangga aylanadi chivin va pishmagan qushlar urg'ochi ayolga o'xshaydi. Reunion paraketi bo'yin atrofida to'liq pushti bo'yinbog'ga ega edi, ammo Mauritiusning pastki qismida orqa tomonga burildi. Tegishli atirgul halqali parraket tanishtirdi Mavrikiyga o'xshash, rang jihatidan biroz farq qiladigan va kichikroq bo'lsa ham. Echo parakeet keng doiraga ega vokallar, "chaa-chaa, chaa-chaa" kabi eng keng tarqalgan ovoz.

Turlar mahalliy o'simliklarga ega bo'lgan o'rmonlar bilan cheklanganligi sababli, u asosan cheklangan Qora daryo daralari milliy bog'i Mavrikiyning janubi-g'arbida. Bu daraxt va ga rioya qiladi soyabon, u qaerda ovqatlantiradi va dam oladi. U eski daraxtlardagi tabiiy bo'shliqlarda uyalar va debriyajlar odatda ikkitadan to'rttagacha oq tuxumlardan iborat. Urg'ochi tuxumni inkubatsiya qiladi, erkak esa uni boqadi, yosh esa urg'ochi tomonidan tarbiyalanadi. Hamma juftliklar qat'iy emas monogam, chunki urg'ochilar va "yordamchi erkaklar" o'rtasida naslchilik paydo bo'lishi ma'lum. Echo parakeet asosan mahalliy o'simliklarning mevalari va barglari bilan oziqlanadi, garchi u ovqatlanishi kuzatilgan bo'lsa ham tanishtirdi o'simliklar. Reunion paraketi, ehtimol ov tufayli yo'q bo'lib ketgan o'rmonlarni yo'q qilish Va bu haqda oxirgi marta 1732 yilda xabar berilgan. Echo paraketi Mauritiusga kelganlar tomonidan ovlangan va uning vayron bo'lganligi va o'zgarishi sababli ularning soni 20-asrda kamaydi va 1980-yillarda sakkizdan 12gacha kamaydi. u "dunyodagi eng noyob to'tiqush" deb nomlangan. Intensiv harakat asir etishtirish 1990-yillardan boshlab qushni yo'q bo'lib ketishidan saqlab qoldi; turlar pastga tushirildi juda xavfli ga xavf ostida 2007 yilda, va 2019 yilda populyatsiyasi 750 qushga yetgan, keyinchalik u shunday deb tasniflangan zaif.

Taksonomiya

Filialda yashil to'tiqush tasviri
Filialda yashil to'tiqush tasviri
Plitaning nusxalari P. tenglashadi, yo'q bo'lib ketgan erkak tasvirlangan Reunion parakeet, tomonidan Fransua-Nikolas Martinet, 1770–1783. Plitalar deb hisoblangan bo'lsa-da illyustratsiya turi turlarining asosiy farqlari qo'lda rangli nusxalari bu maqsad uchun etarli bo'lmasligi mumkinligini anglatadi

Reunion va Mavrikiyning Maskarene orollariga ilk sayohatchilarning hisobotlarida yashil parraketlar eslatib o'tilgan. Ular birinchi marta 1674 yilda Frantsiya sayyohi tomonidan Reunionda qayd etilgan Syur Dyubo va 1732 yilda Mauritiusda frantsuz muhandisi Jan-Fransua Charpentier de Cossigny tomonidan. Reunionning yashil parraketlari deb nomlangan perruche à ikkilamchi kolyer ("ikki yoqali parraket") frantsuz tabiatshunoslari tomonidan Maturin Jak Brisson, 1760 yilda, Buffon, 1770–1783 yillarda va François Levaillant, ularni 1801-1805 yillarda Frantsiyaga etib kelgan namunalardan tasvirlab bergan. 1783 yilda Gollandiyalik tabiatshunos Piter Boddaert o'ylab topilgan ilmiy ism Psittakus tenglashadi, frantsuz rassomi tomonidan tayyorlangan plastinka asosida Fransua-Nikolas Martinet Buffonning ishida Reionion qushi haqida yozgan Histoire Naturelle. The aniq ism tengliklar lotincha "otliq" degan ma'noni anglatadi va frantsuz otliq askarining harbiy ranglarini anglatadi. Martinetning plitasi to'plamdagi bir qism bo'lgan namunadan keyin chizilgan Obbrya shkafi Parijda, va plastinka illyustratsiya turi. Zamonaviy rasmlarning jonli yoki to'ldirilgan namunalarga asoslanganligi noma'lum; garchi ularning barchasi turli xil pozalarni namoyish qilsa ham, agar ular o'rnatilgan bo'lsa, bir nechta namunalar mavjudligini ko'rsatadi. Frantsiyadagi tavsiflar turli xil yoki bir xil import qilingan namunalarga asoslanganligi yoki Evropaga etib kelganlari aniq emas. Levaillant ikkita namunani bilar edi va ularning beshtasi mavjud bo'lishi mumkin edi.[2][3]

Mavrikiy va Reunionning yashil parraketlari odatda tarixiy adabiyotda birgalikda muomala qilingan va natijada ularning tarixi aralashgan.[4] 1822 yilda ingliz ornitologi Jon Latham Reunion paraketini (va "bir xil kenglikning boshqa qismlarini") turli xillar qatoriga kiritdi atirgul halqali parraket deb atagan Psittica torquata, Brisson tomonidan yaratilgan nomga asoslangan.[5] 1876 ​​yilda ingliz ornitologlari va aka-ukalari Alfred va Edvard Nyuton Reunion va Mavrikiy avifunasi odatda bir-biridan ajralib turishini va shuning uchun bu parraketlarga ham tegishli bo'lishi mumkinligini ta'kidladi. Ular yangi nomni taklif qilishdi Palaeornis aks-sadosi Mavritaniya turlari uchun (nazarda tutilgan) Echo, a nimfa yilda Yunon mifologiyasi ), u keyinchalik yo'q bo'lib ketgan Reunion turlariga juda o'xshashligini ta'kidlar ekan (bu nomni saqlab qolgan) Paleornis tengdoshlari).[6][3] Italiyalik ornitolog Tommaso Salvadori 1891 yilda yana Mavrikiyni yashash joyi sifatida berib, ikkalasini yana birlashtirdi. 1907 yilda ingliz zoologi Valter Rotshild Reunion va Mauritiusning boshqa qushlari alohida ajralib turishi sababli ikkala turni ajratishni qo'llab-quvvatladilar va ularning farqlari noma'lumligini ta'kidladilar.[7] Jins Paleornis keyinchalik a deb e'lon qilindi kichik sinonim ning Psittakula va birinchisidagi barcha turlar ikkinchisiga ko'chirilgan.[8] Amerikalik ornitolog Jeyms L. Peters Mavrikiy parraketini a pastki turlari atirgul uzukli parraket (Psittakula krameri) 1937 yilda; P. k. aks sado.[9] 1967 yilda amerikalik ornitolog Jeyms Grinvey Mavrikiy va Reunionning parraketlarini atirgul halqali parraketning pastki turlari deb hisobladilar va agar ular Reuniondagi qushlar oddiygina bo'lmagan bo'lsa, ularning bir-biridan farq qilishi ehtimolini topdi. tanishtirdi, ammo qanday qilib noma'lum edi.[10]

Filialda yashil to'tiqush tasviri
Reunion erkak paraketi tasvirlangan Jak Barraband, 1801–1805

Britaniyalik ekolog, maskarene qushlari haqida 1987 yilda yozilgan kitobda Entoni S. Cheke Mauritius va Reunion parraketlari, ehtimol, bir xil turga tegishli ekanligini ta'kidladilar.[2] Xuddi shu nashrda (echo parakeet biologiyasining ozgina tadqiqotlaridan biri bo'lgan bo'lim), ingliz tabiatni muhofaza qilish biologi Karl G. Jons g'arbiy parakeets ekanligini ta'kidladi Hind okeani ehtimol hind tilidan olingan Aleksandrin parraketlari (P. eupatriya), bu qushning xususiyatlarini ular qanchalik uzoqqa tarqalib ketishgan bo'lsa. Jons, shuningdek, eski parraket terisini, ehtimol Reuniondan kelganligini xabar qildi Shotlandiya qirollik muzeyi, Edinburg (a terini o'rganish NMS.Z 1929.186.2 namunasi sifatida kataloglangan). Dastlab frantsuz taksidermisti to'plamining bir qismi Louis Dufresne, uni 1819 yilda Edinburg universiteti muzeyi (keyinchalik Qirollik muzeyiga aylangan) va uning tabiiy-tarixiy kollektsiyasining qolgan qismi sotib olgan. Namunaning asl yorlig'i Levaillant plastinkasiga tegishli "perruche double collier", frantsuz rassomi tomonidan tasvirlangan Jak Barraband, bu Reionon parraketini tasvirlash uchun mo'ljallangan edi. Jons bunday dastlabki namunalarni yig'ish ma'lumotlari har doim ham ishonchli bo'lmasligi va buning o'rniga terining Mauritiusdan kelishi mumkinligi haqida ogohlantirdi. Martinet tipidagi illyustratsiya uchun Edinburg terisi asos bo'lganmi yoki yo'qmi noma'lum. Jons fotosuratlarni tekshirishga asoslanib, terini, ayniqsa, jonli parakitlardan (yoki eski fransuz ta'riflaridan) farq qilmadi. U avvalgi mualliflar bilan Mauritius va Reunion parraketlari bir xil turga tegishli ekanligi to'g'risida kelishib oldi (P. tenglashadi, eng qadimgi ism), lekin ular subspetsifik darajasida alohida saqlanishi kerak (kabi P. tengliklar va P. tenglashadi), yo'q bo'lib ketgan qush haqida qo'shimcha ma'lumot yo'qligi sababli.[11][3][12]

2020 yilda gollandiyalik ornitolog Jastin J. F. J. Yansen va Chek Marinetning plastinkasi, masalan, P. tenglashadi nusxalar orasidagi rangda sezilarli farq qiladi (ba'zilari yuqori ko'krakda sariq rangga ega, boshqalari, masalan, yo'q). Ular shunday degan xulosaga kelishdi qo'lda rangli Martinet tomonidan noma'lum mahorat plitasidan keyin turli xil odamlar tomonidan, ammo ularning qaysi birida tasvirlangan namunani aniq aks ettirganligi aniqlanmaganligi sababli, Jansen va Cheke Brissonning tavsifiga ishonish xavfsizroq deb topdilar.[13]

Mavrikiyning tirik paraketi inglizlar tomonidan tilga olingan umumiy ism "echo parakeet" 1970 yildan beri, ilmiy nomga asoslanib, shuningdek Mauritius parakeet deb nomlangan.[12][14] Mavritaniyaning mahalliy nomi kateau vert, kato, yoki katover (frantsuz tilidan olingan).[11][6] Reunion populyatsiyasi Reunion parakeet va Reunion halqa bo'yinli paraketi deb nomlangan, ammo aks-sado paraketi umumiy nomi ostida ham tushirilgan.[3][12]

Evolyutsiya

Filiallardagi ikkita yashil to'tiqushning tasviri
Martinet, 1760 yil, erkak Reunion paraketi tasviri (tepada)

2004 yilda ingliz genetikasi Jim J. Groomrij va uning hamkasblari tekshiruv o'tkazdilar DNK ning Psittakula parakeets o'zlarining evolyutsion munosabatlarini aniqlash uchun va echo parakeet hindistonning atirgul halqali parraketidan ajralib chiqqanligini aniqladi (P. k. borealis) Afrikaning pastki turiga emas (P. k. krameri). Ular echo paraketi boshqalarga nisbatan yaqinda ajralib turishini aniqladilar Psittakula 0,7 dan 2,0 million yilgacha bo'lgan davrlar, bu 0,6 va 2,1 million yil oldin Mavrikiydagi vulqon harakatsizligi bilan bir vaqtga to'g'ri keladi. Shuning uchun echo parakeetining ajdodlari Hindistondan janubga Hind okeanidan o'tib, orol shakllangan paytda kelgan bo'lishi mumkin. Mualliflar ularning talqinlari yo'q bo'lib ketgan DNKning yo'qligi bilan cheklanganligini ogohlantirdilar Seyshel orollari paraketi (P. wardi) va Nyutonning paragi (P. ekssul) Hind okeanining boshqa orollaridan.[15]

2007 yilda, asoslangan morfologik dalillar, ingliz paleontologi Julian P. Hume echo paraketi atirgul halqali parraketga qaraganda Aleksandrin parraketi bilan chambarchas bog'liqligini aniqladi. U aks-sado parakitining skelet anatomiyasi asosan fotoalbom suyaklaridan ma'lum bo'lganligini ta'kidladi, chunki u g'or konlarida eng ko'p uchraydigan mavritiyalik to'tiqush edi va muzey kollektsiyalarida skeletlari kam uchraydi. Xyumning ta'kidlashicha, Maskarene orollariga xos bo'lgan ko'plab qushlar kelib chiqadi Janubiy Osiyo ota-bobolari va to'tiqushlar uchun ham Janubiy Osiyoning isbotlanishi ehtimoli bor edi. Davomida dengiz sathi past bo'lgan Pleystotsen, shuning uchun turlar orol sakrash ajratilgan orollarga borish mumkin edi. Maskarenli to'tiqushlarning ko'pchiligining kam ma'lum bo'lishiga qaramay, qoldiq qoldiqlari ularning kattalashgan bosh va jag'lar kabi xususiyatlarga ega ekanligini ko'rsatadi. ko'krak qafasi elementlar va mustahkam oyoq elementlari. Xyum ular ichida umumiy kelib chiqishni taklif qilishdi Psittakulini nurlanish, morfologik xususiyatlarga asoslanib va Psittakula to'tiqushlar Hind okeanidagi ko'plab ajratilgan orollarni mustamlaka qilishga muvaffaq bo'lishdi.[3] 2008 yilda Cheke va Xyum ushbu guruh ushbu hududga bir necha marta bostirib kirgan bo'lishi mumkin deb taxmin qilishdi, chunki ularning ko'p turlari shu qadar ixtisoslashganki, ular ajralib turishi mumkin edi. issiq joy orollari Maskarenlar dengizdan chiqishidan oldin.[16]

2011 yilda Britaniyalik biolog Samit Kundu va uning hamkasblari tomonidan o'tkazilgan DNK tadqiqotida atirgul halqali parraketning ikkita kichik turi o'rtasida guruhlangan echo paraketi namunalari topildi, P. k. krameri va P. k. borealis. Ular Hind okeanidagi ba'zi orol turlari o'z turlarida erta ajralib chiqqanligi sababli qoplamalar ichida echo parakeet, shu jumladan P. krameri, Afrika va Osiyo aksincha emas, balki u erdan mustamlaka qilingan bo'lishi mumkin. Ular 3,7 milliondan 6,8 million yil oldin paroket parchalanishini aniqladilar, agar bu to'g'ri bo'lsa, buni anglatishi mumkin spetsifikatsiya Mavrikiy shakllanishidan oldin sodir bo'lgan. Ushbu tadqiqotchilar qila olmadilar ekstrakti DNK Edinburg namunasidan.[17]

2015 yilda ingliz genetikasi Hazel Jekson va uning hamkasblari Edinburg namunasining oyoq barmoqlaridan DNK olishga va uni Mavrikiy namunalari bilan taqqoslashga muvaffaq bo'lishdi. Ular ichida ekanligini aniqladilar P. krameri clade, dan Nyuton parakeet Rodriges Mavrikiy va Reunion parakitlari uchun ajdod bo'lib, ulardan 3,82 million yil oldin ajralib chiqqan va keyingi ikkitasi atigi 0,61 million yil oldin bir-biridan 0,2 foizga farq qilgan. Tadqiqotchilar Mauritius va Reunion populyatsiyalari o'rtasidagi farqlanishning past darajasi ular subspetsifik darajada ajralib turishiga mos keladi degan xulosaga kelishdi. Quyidagi kladogramma ko'rsatadi filogenetik Mauritius va Reunion pastki turlarining pozitsiyasi, Jekson va uning hamkasblari fikriga ko'ra, 2015 yil:[18]

Kulrang to'tiqushning tasviri
1770 yillarning yo'q bo'lib ketganligi haqidagi rasm Nyutonning paragi, bu echo parakeetining eng yaqin qarindoshi edi

Psittacula krameri parvirostris (Habashiston gullari uzukli parraket)

Psittacula krameri manillensis (Hindistonning atirgul uzukli paragi)

Psittacula krameri borealis (Boreal gulli uzukli parraket)

Psittakula aks-sadosi (Mauritius parakeet)

Psittakula tenglashadi (Reunion parakeet)

Psittakula ekssuli (Nyutonning paragi)

Psittacula krameri krameri (Afrika atirgulli halqali parraket)

Cheke va Jansen 2016 yilda Edinburg namunasida aniqlik haqidagi aniq ma'lumot yo'qligini va u Mavrikiydan to'plangan bo'lishi mumkinligini ta'kidladilar (Dyufresnning boshqa qush namunalaridan faqat bittasi Reuniondan, ba'zilari esa Mavrikiydan olingan). Ularning ta'kidlashicha, Mavritaniyaning zamonaviy namunalaridan farqli o'laroq, Edinburg namunasining pushti bo'yin halqasi Buffon va Levaillant ta'riflaganidek, bo'yinning orqa qismida uzluksiz davom etgan, ammo Levaillant tasvirlagan namunaning qaerdaligi aniq emas edi. Ularning ta'kidlashicha, namunalar orasidagi genetik farqlar subspetsifik bo'lmagan bo'lishi kerak, ammo Mavritaniya namunalari Edinburg namunasidan ancha yangi bo'lganligi sababli, avvalgi namunalarning o'xshashligi tufayli bo'lishi mumkin edi. genetik to'siq, 19-asrda Mavritaniya aholisining keskin pasayishi natijasida. Ularning fikriga ko'ra, sukut bo'yicha taxmin Reuniondan kelib chiqqan bo'lishi kerak. Ular, shuningdek, 1770 yil atrofida frantsuz rassomi Pol Filipp Sanguin de Jossigny tomonidan bo'yin bilan o'ralgan yoqa bilan bo'yinbog'li paraketning har qanday oroldan bo'lishi mumkin deb o'ylagan, odatda, e'tibordan chetda qoladigan, yozilmagan eskiziga e'tibor qaratdilar.[19] 2017 yilda Xum Edinburg namunasi Mavrikiydan bo'lishi mumkinligiga rozi bo'ldi. U genetik tafovutlar u erdagi populyatsiyada turlicha bo'lishiga bog'liq bo'lishi mumkinligini aytdi va ba'zi boshqa qush turlari Mavrikiy va Reunion o'rtasida ko'chib yurishini ta'kidladi.[20]

Shuningdek, 2017 yilda avstraliyalik ornitolog Jozef M. Forshu Mavrikiy va Reunion populyatsiyalari bir-biridan alohida ajralib turishi va Edinburg namunasi Reuniondan ekanligi va shu nom bilan belgilanishi kerakligi to'g'risida kelishib oldilar. neotip ning P. tenglashadi.[21] Keyingi yil Jons va uning hamkasblari, shu jumladan DNK tadqiqotlari mualliflari Xyum va Forshu, Edinburg namunasini Reunion paraketi sifatida aniqlashni va populyatsiyalar o'rtasidagi subspetsifik farqni qo'llab-quvvatladilar. Ular namunaning barcha tekshirilgan Mauritius namunalaridan bo'yinning orqa qismida bo'shliq bo'lish o'rniga to'liq pushti bo'yinbog 'bilan ajralib turishini aniqladilar, bu xususiyatni Reunion paraketi ta'riflarida Brisson, Buffon va Levaillant ta'kidladilar, ammo emas 1980 yillarda Jons tomonidan ko'rilgan fotosuratlarda aniq. Orollardagi populyatsiyalar, odatda, qit'alardagiga qaraganda kamroq genetik xilma-xillikka ega bo'lganligi sababli, ular Mauritius va Reunion namunalari o'rtasidagi farqning past darajasi kutilayotganligini ta'kidladilar. Shuningdek, ular Jossignining rasmida Reunion paraketi ko'rsatilgan degan xulosaga kelishdi.[12]

2018 yilda amerikalik ornitolog Kaiya L. Provost va uning hamkasblari Maskarenli to'tiqush (Mascarinus mascarinus) va Tanygnathus turlar ichida guruhlash Psittakula, bu turni yasash parafiletik (g'ayritabiiy guruhlash) va bu oxirgi naslni buzish uchun asos ekanligini ta'kidladi.[22] Muammoni hal qilish uchun nemis ornitologi Maykl P. Braun va uning hamkasblari 2019 yilda shunday taklif qilishdi Psittakula ko'p nasllarga bo'linishi kerak. Ular echo parakeetini yangi turga joylashtirdilar Aleksandrinus, uning eng yaqin qarindoshlari bilan birga.[23][24]

Tavsif

Daraxtdagi novdalar orasida o'tirgan qora yoqali yashil to'tiqushning fotosurati
Erkak: yozuv qora yoqa, chiziq don ko'zga va qizil rangli yuqori qog'ozga

Echo parakeet uzunligi 34-42 sm (13-17 dyuym) va og'irligi 167-193 g (5.9-6.8 oz), bu esa uni boshqa, hozir yo'q bo'lib ketgan mavritiyalik to'tiqushlardan kichikroq qiladi. Qanotlarning kengligi 49-54 sm (19-21 dyuym), har bir qanotning uzunligi 177-190 mm (7.0-7.5 dyuym), dumi 164-200 mm (6.5-7.9 dyuym), jinoyatchilar 21-23 mm (0,83-0,91 dyuym) va tarsus 20-22 mm (0,79-0,87 dyuym). Ayol o'rtacha erkaklarnikidan biroz kichikroq.[12][3][21] U odatda yashil rangga ega, orqa tomoni quyuqroq va pastki qismi sarg'ish. Erkak kishi engilroq, ayol esa umuman qorong'i. Uning bo'ynida ikkita halqa yoqasi bor, ular to'liqsiz, orqada uchrasha olmaydilar. Erkakning bitta qora va bitta pushti bo'yinbog'i bor, u yon tomonda yarim oy shaklida ko'rinadi va uning ustida ko'k rangli sufuziya mavjud. Ayolning noaniq qora yoqasi va yashil yoqasi bor, u yonoqlari bo'ylab quyuq yashil rangga, bo'yin orqasida esa sariq-yashil rangga aylanadi. Erkakning qora, tor chizig'i bor don ko'zga. Tashqi asosiy patlar ba'zi erkaklar ko'k rangga bo'yalgan. Voyaga etgan erkakning yuqori hisobi och qizil rangga, quyi qora jigarrang rangga, urg'ochi ayolning yuqori qismi esa quyuq, deyarli qora rangga ega. The ìrísí sariq rangga ega, rangpar rangdan yashil ranggacha o'zgarib turadi, ammo pushti yoki oq iridlar bo'lgan shaxslar ham qayd etilgan. Ko'z atrofidagi teri to'q sariq rangga, oyoqlari esa kulrang, yashil rangdan qora ranggacha o'zgarib turadi.[11][12][21] Voyaga etmaganning hisob-kitobi, kattalar erkaknikiga o'xshab, qizil-to'q sariq rangga ega bo'lib, undan keyin ikki-uch oygacha qochqinlar, u kattalardagi ayolnikiga o'xshash qora rangga o'zgarganda. Voyaga etmagan ayolga o'xshaydi.[15][14]

Yagona ma'lum bo'lgan namunalar va zamonaviy ma'lumotlarga asoslanib, yo'q bo'lib ketgan Reunion pastki turlarining erkaklari odatda Mavrikiynikiga o'xshash bo'lgan, ammo biroz kattaroqligi bilan farq qilgan, ularning har bir qanoti 193 mm (7,6 dyuym) uzunlikda va 24,5 mm. (0,96 dyuym). Pushti bo'yin bo'yinni butunlay o'rab oldi, ammo Mavrikiyning pastki qismida bo'ynining orqa qismida bo'sh joy qoldiradi. Reunion pastki turi ham quyuqroq qismlarga ega bo'lganga o'xshaydi.[12] Echo parakeet tegishli atirgul halqali parraketga juda o'xshash (Mauritiusga olib kelingan, bu chalkashliklarni keltirib chiqarmoqda), garchi birinchisining yashil tuklari quyuqroq va boyroq bo'lsa, ensa mavimsi yuvishga ega va dumi yashilroq yuqorida va undan qisqaroq. Urg'ochi atirgul halqali parraketnikiga o'xshaydi, ammo u quyuqroq va zumraddan yashil rangga ega. Echo parakeetidan farqli o'laroq, atirgul halqali parraket ko'rinmaydi jinsiy dimorfizm gaga rangida. Echo parakeet ham oddiyroq va tana hajmi va vazni atirgul halqali parrakdan 25 foizga kattaroqdir. Echo parakeet boshqalarga qaraganda nisbatan qisqa, kengroq va yumaloq qanotlarga ega Psittakula turlari, shuningdek, qisqa va kengroq quyruq.[14][15][25]

Vokalizatsiya

Echo parakeet keng doiraga ega vokallar, va oldinroq eng ovozli pishirish kechqurun. Ular butun yil davomida ovoz chiqaradilar, lekin naslchilik davrida ko'proq. Eng tez-tez uchraydigan vokalizatsiya - bu qo'ng'iroq, "chaa-chaa, chaa-chaa" (shuningdek, "chaa-choa" yoki "kaah" deb tarjima qilingan) kabi yangraydigan past, burun burkagichi, bu alohida yoki tez ketma-ketlikda chiqariladi, sekundiga ikki marta. Parvoz qo'ng'irog'i aloqa qo'ng'irog'iga juda o'xshaydi. Yuqori balandroq hayajon bor yoki qo'ng'iroq bu sekundiga uch-to'rt marta "chee-chee-chee-chee" ga o'xshaydi, odatda parvoz paytida sayoz, tez qanot urishlari bilan ajralib turadi. Bezovta qilganda yoki qo'rqib ketganda, u qisqa, o'tkir "ark" chaqirig'ini berishi mumkin. U o'tirganda ko'proq ohangdor hushtak va hushtak chiqaradi. Ikki marta daraxtga tushgan ayoldan chuqur, sokin "werr-werr" va "prr-rr-rr" purrlari eshitildi. A sudga qo'ng'iroq sentyabr va dekabr oylari orasida eshitish mumkin. Ular, shuningdek, boshqa to'tiqushlarga o'xshash tarzda, g'azablanganda "irillaydilar". Echo parakeetning ovozi balandroq, tezroq va ko'proq "hayajonlangan" ovozli tovushlarga ega bo'lgan atirgul halqali parraketnikidan juda farq qiladi va ularning chaqiruvlarini chalkashtirib bo'lmaydi.[11][26][14]

Yashash joyi va tarqalishi

O'rmonli tog 'hududining surati
Qora daryo daralari milliy bog'i, bu erda asosan bu tur mavjud

Echo parakeet endi Mauritiusning tabiiy o'simliklari bo'lgan o'rmonli hududlari bilan cheklangan, bu 2017 yildan boshlab Mavrikiyning 2 foizidan kamini egallaydi, ya'ni Qora daryo daralari milliy bog'i janubi-g'arbiy qismida. Ular atigi 40 kvadrat kilometrni egallaydilar va ushbu maydonning taxminan yarmidan muntazam foydalanadilar.[11][1][21] Park ichida to'rtta shimoliy aholi (Qora daryo daralarida) va ikkita janubiy (Bel Ombre o'rmonida) mavjud.[27] In tog'li o'rmon, kabi katta, etuk daraxtlarni afzal ko'rishadi Canarium paniculatum, Syzygium shartnoma, Mimusops maxima, Labourdonnaisia sp. Boshqa muhim ovqatlanish joylariga pasttekislik, oraliq va scrub o'rmonlari. Populyatsiya zichligini aks ettiradigan, ularning yashash joylarida aks-sado parraketlari qanchalik tez-tez ko'rinib turishi bo'yicha yillik tebranishlar mavjud. Turlarning tarqalishi mahalliy o'rmonlar bilan bog'langan bo'lsa-da, ularning soni va tarqalishi kamayib boradi, chunki ular yo'q bo'lib ketadi, bir nechta dastlabki ma'lumotlar uning tarqalishi har doim nozik bo'lganligini ko'rsatadi. Echo parakeet ilgari qattiq tanazzulga uchragan joylarda paydo bo'lgan, shuning uchun ular faqat ozgina o'rmon bo'lgan.[11] Garchi hozirda harakatsiz bo'lsa ham, parraket mavsumiy ravishda oziq-ovqat izlash uchun joylar o'rtasida harakat qilgan bo'lishi mumkin; agar tsiklonlar Masalan, mevali daraxtlarni olib tashlagan edi.[14]

2012 yilda ingliz zoolog Kler Raysin va uning hamkasblari tomonidan o'tkazilgan genetik tadqiqotlar shuni ko'rsatdiki, dasturdan oldin asir etishtirish, Qora daryoning daralari milliy bog'ining janubiy qismidagi yanada xavfsizroq Bel Ombre mintaqalaridagi aks sado pareketi genetik jihatdan aholining qolgan qismidan farq qilar edi, ammo genetik xilma-xillik kuchli boshqarish davridan keyin parrandalar oralig'ida tarqalgan edi. hududlar o'rtasida ko'chirildi. Populyatsiyalar o'rtasidagi genetik farqlash dastlab ularni bir-biridan ajratib turadigan o'rmonlarni tozalash bilan bog'liq bo'lishi mumkin.[27]

Xulq-atvor va ekologiya

Filialdagi yashil to'tiqushning fotosurati
Ayol: och yashil rang bo'yinbog'iga e'tibor bering

Echo parakeet daraxt (daraxtlar turar joyi) va saqlaydi soyabon u ovqatlanayotganda va dam olganda o'rmonning. Odatda u yakka yoki kichik guruhlarda aylanib yuradi va atirgul uzukli parraknikiga qaraganda unchalik ochko'zroq bo'ladi. Uchib ketayotganda, aks sadosi paraketi tog 'tizmalaridan o'tayotganda va jarliklardan uchib o'tayotganda yangilanishlarni yaxshi ishlatadi. U atirgul uzukli parraknikiga qaraganda sekinroq uchadi va qanotlarining sekin urishlariga ega. U qisqa masofalarga bo'lsa-da, uchib yurishda usta va soyabon teshiklari orasida tez harakat qiladi. Mavritaniyaning boshqa qushlari singari, aks-sado parekitlari ham uyg'unlashadi, ko'proq oziq-ovqat kam bo'lgan qish paytida; yozda, oziq-ovqat tayyor bo'lganda, ular ko'proq ehtiyot bo'lishadi va odamlar uchun qushlarga yaqinlashish qiyinlashadi. Uyalardagi naslli qushlarni yaqin atrofdagi avtoulovlar bezovta qilmaydi va ularning uyalarini tekshirganda tashvishlanmaydi. Echo parakeets asosan moult yozda ularning patlari, alohida qushlar va yillar o'rtasidagi vaqt o'zgarishi bilan. Tana qishni oxiriga etkazishni boshlaydi, oylar davomida davom etadi va asosiy mollar noyabr va yanvar oylari orasida boshlanadi, mart yoki aprel oylarida dumidan oldin. Aksariyat paraketlarning aksariyati iyun oyining oxirigacha to'liq to'kilgan. Turning uzoq umr ko'rishi noma'lum, ammo u kamida sakkiz yilga etishi mumkin.[11][3]

Echo parakeetining faoliyat turlari boshqalarga o'xshashdir Psittakula ko'p jihatdan parakeets. Ular asosan em-xashak ertalab va tushdan keyin va kechqurun paytida va ob-havoning yomonligi bu faoliyatni buzmaydi. Guruhlar dam olish va preen kunning o'rtalarida (ba'zan vaqti-vaqti bilan) katta daraxtlarda; bu daraxtlar odatda xo'roz uchun ishlatilmaydi. Ular tushdan keyin ovqatlanish joylariga borishda va qaytishda eng faol va ovozli bo'lishadi. Kechqurun oldin bir soat ichida (ular roost vaqt), tez-tez qo'ng'iroq qilishda guruhlar atrofida uchib ketishganda va yana aylanib o'tishdan oldin, daraxtlarning boshlarida qisqa vaqt ichida o'tirishadi. Ular odatda tepaliklar va jarliklarda saqlanadigan joylarda yashaydilar, zich bargli daraxtlarni afzal ko'rishadi (masalan.) Evgeniya, Eritroksil, yoki Labourdonnaisia), ular magistralga yaqin yoki bo'shliqlarda joylashgan. Xo'rozlashning alohida joylarida qayd etilgan qushlar soni birdan o'n birgacha. Qushlar odatda ertalab xo'roz joyidan jimgina chiqib ketishadi, biroq ba'zilari yana bir necha soat turishlari kuzatilgan.[11]

Naslchilik

Echo parakeetning naslchilik harakati boshqalarga o'xshaydi Psittakula parakeets, ularning aksariyati ikki yoshga to'lguncha ko'payishi mumkin.[11] Ularning qarindoshlarida bo'lgani kabi, echo paragining bo'yin va bosh naqshlari hamjihatlik paytida namoyon bo'ladi va shuning uchun jinsiy jihatdan tanlangan, ranglarning o'zgarishi va intensivligi bilan, ehtimol, ularni anglatadi fitness. Pushti bo'yinbog'lar ustunlikni namoyish qilish paytida ko'tariladi (va sezilarliroq bo'ladi), iris esa kengayib, qisqaradi.[12] Ko'payish davri odatda avgust yoki sentyabr oylarida boshlanadi va uyaga saylovlar mavsum boshida bo'ladi. Qushlar tabiiy bo'shliqlarda, ko'pincha katta, qadimgi mahalliy daraxtlarda, masalan Kalofillum, Kanariy, Mimusops va Sideroksilon, erdan kamida 10 m (33 fut) balandlikda va ta'sirlangan janubiy sharqqa ta'sir qilmagan savdo shamollari. Bo'shliqlar odatda gorizontal novdalarda (vertikal magistrallarda emas), kamida 50 sm (20 dyuym) chuqurlikda, kengligi 20 sm (8 dyuym) va ularning kirish teshiklari diametri 10-15 sm (4-6 dyuym) ga teng. . Suv toshqini tez-tez uchraydi va ba'zi teshiklarda uning oldini olish yoki minimallashtiradigan ortiqcha yoki boshqa xususiyatlar mavjud.[11][14][1]

Juftlikni saqlash xatti-harakatlari yil davomida namoyish etiladi, erkak odatda qat'iyatli va o'z ichiga oladi regurgitatsion ovqatlanish, hisob-kitob va erkaklar ayolning ensa patlarini oldindan ko'rishadi. Kopulyatsiya sentyabr va oktyabr oylarida kuzatilgan va unga qadar ketma-ketlik atirgul uzuklari va Aleksandrin parraketlariga o'xshaydi. Erkak ayolga yaqinlashishdan oldin tumshug'ini artib, sekin unga qarab yuradi va enagasini ovlaydi. Ayol gorizontal ravishda cho'kadi, so'ngra erkak tomonidan o'rnatiladi, u kopulyatsiya paytida boshini bir necha marta ko'taradi va tushiradi. O'rnatish besh daqiqagacha davom etishi mumkin, shundan keyin erkak ayolni boqishi mumkin va juftlik bir-birlarini chaqiradilar.[11]

Inson ushlab turgan pushti to'tiqush jo'jasining fotosurati
Qo'lda tarbiyalangan jo'ja

Tuxumlar avgust va oktyabr oylari orasida, asosan sentyabrning oxiri va oktyabr oyining boshlarida va kechqurun qo'yiladi debriyajlar takroriy yotqizish bilan bog'liq bo'lishi mumkin. Debriyajning kattaligi odatdagidek to'rtdan to'rttagacha bo'lganligi haqida xabar berilgan. Tuxumlar to'tiqushlarga xos bo'lib, yumaloq va oq rangga ega, ularning o'lchamlari 32,2 x 26,8 mm (1,27 x 1,06 dyuym) va vazni taxminan 11,4 g (0,40 oz). Kuluçka muddati taxminan 21-25 kunni tashkil qiladi va butunlay turdosh ayollarda bo'lgani kabi, ayol tomonidan amalga oshiriladi. Shu vaqt ichida urg'ochi kuniga to'rt-besh marta erkak tomonidan, taxminan har ikki soatda bir marta, uyaning teshigidan tashqarida oziqlanadi. Yoshlar tug'ma urg'ochi tomonidan va kunning ko'p qismida tuxum chiqqandan keyingi ikki haftadan boshlab qarovsiz qoldiriladi. Taxminan ikki haftalik nestlingsni 79 daqiqagacha bo'lgan vaqt oralig'ida ota-ona ovqatlantirayotgani kuzatilgan. Ota-onalardan biri yoki ikkalasi ham yosh bolani boqadimi, aniq emas, ammo boshqa to'tiqushlarda bo'lgani kabi, ayol ham birinchi kunlarda erkaklar bilan boqish paytida ular bilan birga bo'ladi, va yosh bolalarda gomeotermik (barqaror tana haroratiga ega), ikkalasi ham bolalarni boqish va boqish.[11][28][1][21]

Yoshlarning ikkitasi odatda tarbiyalanadi.[14] Jo'jalar asta-sekin rivojlanib boradi, qorong'u tuklar yo'llari orqada va besh kundan keyin asosiy kvilinglar ko'rinadi. Ochilish boshlanganda, ko'zlari yorilganga o'xshaydi va oyoqlari pushti rangdan och kul rangga aylanib ketgandan so'ng, o'n kunlikdan keyin traktatlar ko'proq ko'rinadi. Ko'zlar o'n besh kundan keyin deyarli to'liq ochiladi va jo'jalar tanasining ko'p qismida yashil-kulrang mayda po'stlog'iga ega, ikkilamchi kvilinglar paydo bo'ladi va boshning tojida patlar yo'llari paydo bo'ladi. Ular yigirma kundan keyin butunlay yashil rang bilan qoplanadi va o'ttiz kundan keyin qanot va quyruq patlari paydo bo'ladi. Qirq kundan keyin barcha kontur, qanot va dum patlari yaxshi rivojlangan, ammo pastki qismi va yonbosh qismida hali ham saqlanib qoladi. Nestlings etarli darajada rivojlangan bo'lsa, ular uyaga kirganlarni baland ovozda va chaqishi bilan qo'rqitishi mumkin, ammo buzg'unchi davom etsa, u burchaklarga chekinadi va harakatsiz qoladi. Ellik kundan keyin jo'jalar ancha faol bo'lib, qanotlarini silkitib, kirish teshigiga yaqinlashmoqdalar. Jo'jalar 50-60 kundan so'ng, oktyabr oyi oxiri va fevral oylari orasida ovlashadi va yangi tug'ilgan bolalar uydan chiqqandan keyin bir oz vaqt qoladilar. Ular ota-onalariga uchib ketishi bilanoq ozuqa olish uchun hamroh bo'lishadi va ular bilan birga bo'lishadi va uyadan chiqqandan keyin ikki-uch oy davomida boqishadi. Yoshlar mevalarni sinchkovlik bilan tanlab olayotgan kattalarga taqlid qilgani va mart oyining oxirlarida kattalar tomonidan oziqlangani kuzatilgan.[21][11]

"Yordamchi" vazifasini bajaradigan qo'shimcha kattalar erkaklar parrandalari, ular uyalayotgan urg'ochi va uyalalarni oziqlantirish orqali (odatda, uyalashgan juftlik rad qilishadi, lekin ba'zida uyani uyasini tark etishiga yo'l qo'yib, uyalashni buzadi). 1980-yillar. "Yordamchilar" ehtimol yaqinda sodir bo'lgan hodisa, deb o'ylashdi, ehtimol bu em-xashak maydonlarining vayron bo'lishi va ko'p sonli nasl bermaydigan qushlarning boshqa joylarga ko'chib ketishi va u erdagi populyatsiyada beqaror haddan oshish.[11] 1990-yillarning oxirida, echo parakeet ehtimol emasligi haqida xabar berilgan edi monogam, lekin moyilligi bor polyandriya, bu erda naslchilik guruhlari bir nechta erkak va bitta ayoldan iborat (garchi monogam juftliklar ham kuzatilgan bo'lsa). Bundan tashqari, jinsiy nisbati aholida tarixiy hisob-kitoblarga ko'ra doimiy ravishda erkaklar tarafdoridir. 2008 yilda ingliz biologlari Tiavanna D. Teylor va Devid T. Parkin tomonidan olib borilgan genetik tadqiqotlar shuni ko'rsatdiki, paroket parrandasi jo'jalari va embrionlari orasida jinslar nisbati teng bo'lgan va kattalar orasida erkak tarafkashlik jinsi nisbati, masalan, qarindoshlik.[29] 2009 yilda Teylor va Parkin tomonidan o'tkazilgan dastlabki genetik tadqiqotlar shuni ko'rsatdiki, "yordamchi erkaklar" ning naslchilik jufti urg'osi bilan juftlashishi ro'y beradi va shuning uchun echo paraketi qat'iy monogam emas. Bunday juftlashish turi turlarni saqlab qolish uchun foydalidir, chunki u genetik xilma-xillikni oshiradi, ammo nega bunday naslchilik guruhlari paydo bo'lishi noma'lum.[30]

Diet va ovqatlanish

Yashil buta fotosurati
Calophyllum tacamahaca bu parraket parhezining bir qismidir

Echo parakeet asosan Mavritaniyaning mahalliy o'simliklari bilan oziqlanadi, oz bo'lsa ham tanishtirdi o'simliklar ham iste'mol qilinadi va mevalar (53%), barglar (31%), gullar (12%), kurtaklar, yosh kurtaklar, urug'lar, novdalar va qobiq yoki sharbat (4%) kabi qismlarni iste'mol qiladi. U daraxtlarda oziqlanadi va kamdan-kam hollarda yoki hech qachon erga tushmaydi va ba'zi holatlarda avlodlar davomida ishlatib kelingan maqbul daraxtlarga qaytadi. Bir tadqiqotga ko'ra, olingan o'simlik turlarining 25% dan ko'prog'idan iborat Calophyllum tacamahaca, Canarium paniculatum, Tabernaemontana mauritiana, Diospyros sp., Eritrospermum monticolum, Evgeniya sp., Labourdonnaisia sp., Mimusops maxima, Mimusops petiolaris, Nuxia verticillata va Protium obtusifolium. Kabi ba'zi turlari Calophyllum parviflorum, boshqalarga qaraganda muhimroq, mevalari esa Syzygium shartnoma va Sideroxylon cinereum ko'pincha e'tiborsiz qoldirilgan.[11][14][1]

Echo parakeets, atirgul halqali parraketdan farqli o'laroq, hech qachon erga yemaydi va daraxtzorga o'ralgan bo'lishi mumkin, chunki Mavrikiyning boshqa to'tiqushlari allaqachon erga boqishga moslashgan.[3] Hozirda kamdan-kam uchraydigan turlar o'tmishda afzal ko'rilgan bo'lishi mumkin, masalan Olax psittacorum sifatida tanilgan bois perroquets (parakeet daraxtlari), ehtimol qushlar uni yaxshi ko'rishardi. Parakeets o'tmishda qulay o'simliklarning urug 'etishtirishga ta'sir qilgan bo'lishi kerak; ba'zi mevalar juda qiyin epikarp himoya qilish uchun rivojlangan bo'lishi mumkin bo'lgan to'tiqushlarga chidamli (qattiq tashqi teri). Ba'zi turlar go'shtli perikarp bilan o'ralgan qattiq epikarpga ega bo'lib, ularni echo paraketi iste'mol qiladi, so'ngra ular avvalgisini rad etishadi, ehtimol bu o'z hissasini qo'shadi urug'larning tarqalishi. 1987 yilda juda keng tarqalgan mevalar, Psidium cowianum (odatda qulupnay guava nomi bilan mashhur) echo parakeet tomonidan qabul qilinmagan, ammo 1998 yilda qushlar tobora ko'proq va boshqa ekzotik o'simliklardan, shu jumladan Averrhoa karambolasi (yulduz mevasi), Ligustrum robustum (privet) va Solanum auriculatum (yovvoyi olma).[11][1][21]

Echo parakeet turli fasllarda turli hududlarda em-xashak va mitti o'rmon va scrubland yil davomida muhim ahamiyatga ega, chunki qushlar turli xil turlari bilan oziqlanadi, chunki qutulish mumkin bo'lgan qismlar mavjud bo'ladi. However, the fruiting of many plants is irregular and some species have become rare, and food is therefore not always seasonally available. When fruits are scarce during winter and early spring, the birds eat more leaves and spend more time foraging. The birds wander in search for food, sometimes several kilometres to and from an area. The echo parakeet forages alone or in small groups with individuals ignoring each other, but since so few birds used to exist, it has been hard to estimate how social the species is. Pairs stay loosely associated throughout the year and forage together. They mainly forage during the morning and late afternoon, feeding activity diminishing during harsh weather.[11]

Echo parakeets are silent when they clamber around feeding. They remove fruits and flowers with their bills, sometimes hanging upside down to reach, the food is then held by a foot while eaten. When feeding on Tabernaemontana mauritiana leaves, the parakeets often scoop out the mezofill (internal spongy tissue) while leaving the tsellyuloza, whereafter the petiole and midrib are discarded. Many leaves and fruits are only partially eaten or sampled before being discarded. The parakeets may masticate a bite for several minutes before swallowing it.[11]

Aggression and competition

Barglar orasidagi yashil to'tiqushning fotosurati
Atirgul uzukli parraket on Mauritius: this related species was tanishtirdi around 1886, and competes for nest-sites and probably some food.

Psittakula parakeets employ mobbing behaviour with groups clustering together to noisily scold animals perceived as threatening. Echo parakeets may mob during territorial conflicts, or they may divert their flight to chase other birds. Echo parakeets have been observed chasing rose-ringed parakeets, Mavrikiy kestrellari (Falco punktatus), oq dumli tropik qushlar (Feton lepturusi) va megabatlar. Mauritius kestrels are mobbed regularly by echo parakeets joining and flying around the kestrel together, and landing in surrounding trees while emitting alarm calls. They may also respond to introduced Qisqichbaqa iste'mol qiladigan makakalar (Macaca fascicularis) with loud calls, though they have also been observed to ignore nearby foraging monkeys.[11] They compete for food with the monkeys, and their diet overlaps with that of the pink pigeon (Nesoenas mayeri), the Mauritius bulbul (Gipsipetes olivaceus), va Mavritaniyalik uchar tulki (Pteropus niger).[21]

The echo parakeet is only territorial during the naslchilik mavsumi and defends the area around the nest tree. Their territoriality is inconsistent and not vigorous, and birds are in loose association with their breeding areas outside the season. They may direct their territorial aggression at both conspecifics and other species, many encounters being subtle and hard to recognise. Both sexes take part in defence before laying, but the male takes a dominant role afterwards. They first react by calling, which may be enough to discourage an intruder, but if the interaction becomes more intense, one or both members of the pair will approach the intruder by cautiously jumping between tree limbs, and will circle slowly around the trees near the nest, as the intruder gets closer. Fights are rare, although on one occasion two males were observed fighting in low bushes and then on the ground; one male broke free and flew away, and neither appeared to be seriously injured.[11]

The rose-ringed parakeet (of the subspecies P. k. borealis[15]) was introduced to Mauritius around 1886 and is now flourishing there. Its population is estimated at 10,000 birds and it is widespread across Mauritius. Closely related to the echo parakeet and physically similar, though no hybrids have been recorded, they compete for nest-sites and probably some food, but are usually passive towards each other outside the breeding season; they have been seen pursuing each other as well as flying together and feeding in the same trees. While the rose-ringed parakeet has much broader feeding requirements (and may be ecologically separated), it may have excluded the echo parakeet from expanding and adjusting its feeding ecology to the changing environment by entirely occupying this more generalised niche. The most serious form of competition between the echo parakeet and the rose-ringed parakeet is over nest-sites; the introduced species often takes over cavities used by the native parakeets. Echo parakeets are reportedly easily frustrated when defending their nest-territories and have been seen relinquishing them without physically defending them. Two out of seven echo parakeet nest cavities were taken over by rose-ringed parakeets in 1974, and only rose-ringed parakeets were nesting in the Macabé Ridge area for several years.[11][25][31]

Holat

Rad etish

XVI asr tasvirida o'rmonzorda ishlaydigan erkaklar
Depiction of Dutch activities on Mauritius in 1598, with various parrots above, and a dodo chap tomonda

There are believed to have been seven endemic Mascarene parrot species; all but the echo parakeet have vanished. The others were likely made extinct by a combination of excessive hunting and o'rmonlarni yo'q qilish by humans, as well as the invaziv turlar brought with them (through predation and competition). On Mauritius, the echo parakeet coexisted with the keng to'tiqush (Lophopsittacus mauritianus) va Maskaren kulrang parakti (Psittakula bensoni), and the Réunion parakeet lived alongside the Mascarene parrot and the Mascarene grey parakeet. Newton's parakeet and the Rodriges to'tig'i (Necropsittacus rodricanus) lived on nearby Rodrigues. Worldwide, many parrots have been driven to extinction by humans; island populations have been especially vulnerable, partially due to their tameness. To the sailors who visited the Mascarene Islands from the late 16th-century onwards, the fauna was largely viewed as a source of food.[3][4] Many other endemic species of Mauritius were lost after the arrival of man, including the dodo (Raphus cucullatus, which has since become a symbol of extinction), so the ekotizim orolga jiddiy zarar yetgan va uni qayta tiklash qiyin. Omon qolgan endemik fauna hali ham jiddiy tahdid ostida. Before humans arrived, Mauritius was entirely covered in forests, almost all of which have since been lost.[32]

The last report of the Réunion parakeet is that of the French colonist Joseph-François Charpentier de Cossigny from 1732, and Hume expressed surprise that the population disappeared so quickly after the arrival of humans, considering the available habitat and the fact that the Mauritius population managed to survive. Hume estimated that the Réunion parakeet had gone extinct due to hunting and deforestation around 1730–50.[3] Jones and colleagues pointed out that other Mascarene birds survived into the 18th and 19th centuries without being noted, and suggested that the Réunion parakeet could have survived as late as the early 19th century (Jossigny's sketch could support the parakeet surviving at least until c. 1770).[12] Cossigny's final 1732 account of the Réunion parakeet (and the last of the Mascarene grey parakeet) reads as follows:

The woods are full of parrots, either completely grey or completely green. Ular ilgari juda ko'p iste'mol qilar edilar, ayniqsa kulrang, lekin ikkalasi ham har doim oriq va ularga sous qo'yadigan juda qattiq.[3]

The Dutch soldier Johannes Pretorius (on Mauritius from 1666 to 1669) reported that there were many parrots, and that echo parakeets were caught alive with nets, but could sometimes not be caught, being too high up in trees. Parrots were often caught to be given as gifts or sold during the 17th century and were probably kept alive on Mauritius before being exported. That the parrots kept to high trees indicates they had become wary of humans at this time.[33] In 1754 and 1756, D. de La Motte described the abundance of echo parakeets in Mauritius, and their use as food:

XVI asrda to'tiqush ovlayotgan erkaklar tasviri
1598 yilda Mauritiusda Gollandiyalik ovchi to'tiqushlarning tasviri

One eats here [in Mauritius] a good number of long-tailed green parrots called perruches whose flesh is black and very good. A hunter can kill three or four dozen in a day. There is a time of year when these birds eat a seed that makes their flesh bitter and even dangerous.[3]

Assessments of the echo parakeet's status varied in early literature; while it was said to be "quite common" in the 1830s, by 1876 the Newtons said "its numbers are gradually falling". In 1904, the French naturalist Paul Carié said the population was "reasonably large", while Rothschild said the bird was rare and apparently "on the verge of extinction" in 1907. Areas where the echo parakeet could be found were cleared for tea and forestry from the 1950s to the 1970s, and the birds were forced into the remaining native habitat, in and around the Black River Gorges. 50 pairs were estimated to be left in 1970, though this may have been too high. By 1975, it was estimated that about 50 individuals remained, but the population appears to have dropped noticeably in the following years, and by 1983 only a suruv of 11 birds was seen, which was believed to represent the entire population. The drop in numbers around this time may have been tied to cyclone Claudette in December 1979. There was little nesting success, and the parakeets reproduced at a level below that necessary for replacement.[11]

Tabiatni muhofaza qilish

Qafasdagi novdada o'tirgan karavot
Mavrikiy kestrel awaiting release in 1989; this species was considered the rarest bird in the world by 1973 but was saved through asir etishtirish, an approach later successfully applied to the echo parakeet

The plight of the endangered Mauritian birds attracted the attention of ornithologists beginning in the early 1970s, who went to the island to study them. The Mauritius kestrel was by 1973 considered the rarest bird in the world, with only six individuals left, and the pink pigeon numbered about 20 birds in the wild; both species were later saved from extinction through captive breeding by the Jersi yovvoyi hayotni saqlashga ishonish (now known as Durrell Wildlife Conservation Trust). The American biologist Stenli ibodatxonasi began a programme to halt the decline of the echo parakeet in 1974, but these attempts failed, since unlike other Psittakula parakeets, it proved difficult to keep them in captivity (all the birds involved died). Capturing more birds also failed, none of the nest boxes placed by Temple were used by the parakeets, and translocating the few remaining birds elsewhere was deemed too risky.[11][34] By the 1980s, most Mauritian naturalists believed the echo parakeet was going to be extinct in the near future; it was now considered the rarest and most endangered Mascarene bird, and was referred to as "the world's rarest parrot".[25][34][16]

In 1980, Carl Jones described the situation as desperate, and stated that the remaining birds would have to be caught for captive breeding if the echo parakeet was to be saved; this solution was also recommended by the Qushlarni saqlash bo'yicha xalqaro kengash o'sha yili.[25] By the 1980s, only 8–12 echo parakeets were known, including three females, and Jones, who had led the efforts that saved the Mauritius kestrel and the pink pigeon, turned his focus on the parakeets. The New Zealand conservationist Don Merton (who had faced similar problems with birds in his homeland) was invited to help, and drawing on their experience with other birds, they devised a strategy for the echo parakeet. They treated nests with insecticides to prevent chicks being killed by nest flies, secured nest entrances to prevent tropic-birds from taking over them, stapled smooth PVX around trunks and placed poison nearby to deter qora kalamushlar, and pruned canopies around nest trees to prevent monkeys attacking by jumping there from nearby trees. Feeding hoppers were introduced to provide food during seasonal shortages, though it took years for the birds to learn how to use them, and nest cavities were made waterproof.[34] Following improved breeding success in the wild, there were 16–22 birds in 1993/4, and another captive pair produced a chick in 1993.[35] Due to the successes with saving native birds, the Black River Gorges and surrounding areas were declared the first milliy bog of Mauritius in 1994.[36][34]

O'rmondagi yog'och belgilar
Sign pointing to the "parakeet trail" in Black River Gorges National Park

In 1996, six previously unknown echo parakeet breeding groups were found in the Black River Gorges, some in areas of the Bel Ombre forest that had not been surveyed before and others within the known breeding range. These almost doubled the number of breeding groups from those seen the previous season. The echo parakeet was made a priority project by the Mauritian Wildlife Foundation following the season's breeding success, and it was decided to initiate a captive breeding programme at the Jerald Durrell endemik yovvoyi tabiat qo'riqxonasi.[37] It was discovered that from clutches of three or four eggs, only one chick would usually fledge, so the team began to take the surplus; the parents could more easily raise the brood they were left with, and such surplus chicks would be given to pairs that had failed to hatch their eggs. Many surplus chicks were also taken to the breeding centre where they were reared successfully, and the first three birds bred in captivity were released into the wild in 1997. These and later hand-reared birds were found to be too tame and naive; they would land on people's shoulders, or near cats and mongozlar, which subsequently killed them. Jones decided to release the captive-bred birds after nine to ten weeks when fledging would normally occur, instead of seventeen, and these young birds were better at integrating with wild birds, and learning social and survival skills. Captive-bred birds who had learned to use feeding hoppers in captivity passed on this ability to wild birds, and the number of birds that fed at food hoppers and used nest boxes provided by the team increased in the following years. The birds had not used the nest boxes before 2001, after which they were improved in design.[34][38] By 1998, there were 59–73 birds, including 14 that had been captive bred since 1997.[35]

By 2005, 139 captive birds had been released and intensive management of the wild population ceased in 2006. Since then only supplemental food and nest boxes have been provided. By 2007, about 320 echo parakeets lived in the wild, with numbers growing, and the species was downgraded from juda xavfli ga xavf ostida 2007 yilda IUCN xavf ostida bo'lgan turlarining Qizil ro'yxati; its numbers were still low overall and its range restricted. In 2009–2010, 78% of nesting attempts occurred in nesting boxes and a record of 134 chicks fledged during this breeding season. By 2016 the population had approached 700 birds. Though the echo parakeet is considered to have been saved from extinction, it still needs continued management by humans to stay secure from remaining threats. Since the carrying capacity of the Black River Gorges National Park had reached its limit, echo parakeets were released in the mountains of eastern Mauritius around 2016, and it has been suggested that birds could be introduced to the other Mascarene Islands.[34][21][35] In 2015, Jackson and colleagues suggested that, due to their close genetic relatedness, the echo parakeet could be used as ecological replacements of the extinct Réunion parakeet and Newton's parakeet of Rodrigues, which would also secure the echo parakeet further. Since it has been suggested that some endemic trees and parrots on the Mascarenes co-evolved, reintroducing the echo parakeet could aid in seed-dispersal, a function previously carried out by its extinct relatives. Jackson and colleagues cautioned that the rose-ringed parakeet is seen as a crop-pest on Rodrigues and that local communities may, therefore, be apprehensive towards the introduction of the very similar echo parakeet, which may act the same way in a new environment.[18] By 2019, the population had reached 750 birds in the wild, and the species' conservation status was classified as zaif.[39]

Tahdidlar

Tog'li o'rmonning panoramasi, o'ng tomonda maymunlar
View of Black River Gorges National Park, with Qisqichbaqa iste'mol qiladigan makakalar o'ngda; these introduced monkeys compete for food with, and sometimes kill echo parakeets.

The main threat to the species is destruction and alteration of its native habitat, resulting in the loss of feeding areas, which would force the birds to travel widely to find food. In times of food shortage, the female may not receive adequate amounts of food from the male and would be forced to leave the nest to forage, sometimes abandoning it completely. Parakeets have difficulties finding new nest sites if their nests are destroyed or taken by competitors, and many of the old trees used for nesting sites have been destroyed by cyclones; cyclones also kill birds and remove the fruit from trees. Competitors for nest-cavities include bees and wasps, white-tailed tropic-birds, rose-ringed parakeets, oddiy mynas (Acridotheres tristis), and rats. Rats and crab-eating macaques prey on parakeet eggs and chicks (even nesting parents have been killed by the latter), and the monkeys are also the most serious competitors for food since they strip fruits off trees before they are ripe.[11][21] Chicks are threatened by the bloodsucking larvae of tropical nest flies (Passeromyia heterochaeta) as well, which are a major cause of mortality.[40][21] African giant land-snails (Achatina spp.) can suffocate chicks with their slime while entering nests in search of food or shelter.[41] Other introduced species such as yovvoyi cho'chqalar va rusa kiyik (Rusa timorensis) also disturb the parakeets.[35] Hunting by humans does not appear to have been a threat to the species in recent times, and very few have been taken for the uy hayvonlari savdosi.[11]

An isolated case of psittatsin tumshug'i va tuklar kasalligi was recorded in an echo parakeet in 1996; in 2004 there was a significant outbreak, and a subsequent screening programme showed that more than 30% of sampled birds had encountered the disease. Birds younger than two years old are most affected, and 40–50% of fledglings die from it and associated infections each year. Some birds recover, but it is not known if they remain carriers of the disease and pass it on to their offspring, or how it is spread.[21] The disease is also found in local rose-ringed parakeets, but it is not known in which direction it was first transmitted.[31] Though Temple speculated that the population crash in the 1970s was due to disease, no evidence supports this. No parasites were found in droppings examined in the 1970s.[11]

Adabiyotlar

  1. ^ a b v d e f Birdlife Intetrnational (2019). "Psittakula tenglashadi". IUCN xavf ostida bo'lgan turlarining Qizil ro'yxati. 2019. Olingan 10 dekabr 2019.CS1 maint: ref = harv (havola)
  2. ^ a b Cheke, A. S. (1987). "Maskarene orollarining ekologik tarixi, xususan quruqlikdagi umurtqali hayvonlarning yo'q bo'lib ketishi va kiritilishi to'g'risida". Olmosda A. V. (tahrir). Maskarene orolidagi qushlarni o'rganish. Kembrij universiteti matbuoti. 45-46 betlar. doi:10.1017 / CBO9780511735769.003. ISBN  978-0-521-11331-1.
  3. ^ a b v d e f g h men j k l Hume, J. P. (2007). "Reappraisal of the parrots (Aves: Psittacidae) from the Mascarene Islands, with comments on their ecology, morphology, and affinities" (PDF). Zootaxa. 1513: 4–25, 41–43. doi:10.11646/zootaxa.1513.1.1. Arxivlandi (PDF) from the original on 2016-03-21. Olingan 2018-12-25.
  4. ^ a b Fuller, E. (2001). Yo'qolib ketgan qushlar (qayta ishlangan tahrir). Komstock. pp. 210, 231. ISBN  978-0-8014-3954-4.
  5. ^ Latham, J. (1822). Qushlarning umumiy tarixi. 2. Jacob and Johnson. 160–161 betlar. doi:10.5962/bhl.title.62572. Arxivlandi from the original on 2019-02-18. Olingan 2019-02-17.
  6. ^ a b Newton, A.; Nyuton, E. (1876). "XXVII.-Maskarene orollari psittaci to'g'risida". Ibis. 18 (3): 281–289. doi:10.1111 / j.1474-919X.1876.tb06925.x. Arxivlandi from the original on 2019-03-30. Olingan 2019-01-16.
  7. ^ Rotshild, V. (1907). Yo'qolib ketgan qushlar. Hutchinson & Co. pp. 67–68. Arxivlandi asl nusxasidan 2018-05-09. Olingan 2019-01-16.
  8. ^ Mayr, G. (2010). "Parrot interrelationships – morphology and the new molecular phylogenies" (PDF). Emu. 110 (4): 348–357. doi:10.1071/MU10035. S2CID  73621725. Arxivlandi asl nusxasi (PDF) on 2016-03-12.
  9. ^ Peters, J. L. (1937). Check-list of birds of the world. 3. Garvard universiteti matbuoti. p. 243. doi:10.5962/bhl.title.14581. Arxivlandi from the original on 2019-01-24. Olingan 2019-01-23.
  10. ^ Greenway, J. C. (1967). Yo'qolib ketgan va yo'qolib borayotgan dunyo qushlari. Xalqaro yovvoyi hayotni himoya qilish bo'yicha Amerika qo'mitasi. pp. 108, 128. ISBN  978-0-486-21869-4.
  11. ^ a b v d e f g h men j k l m n o p q r s t siz v w x y z Jones, C. G. (1987). "The larger land-birds of Mauritius". Olmosda A. V. (tahrir). Maskarene orolidagi qushlarni o'rganish. Kembrij universiteti matbuoti. pp. 271–300. doi:10.1017/CBO9780511735769.007. ISBN  978-0-521-11331-1.
  12. ^ a b v d e f g h men Jons, C. G.; Jackson, H. A.; McGowan, R. Y.; Xyum, J. P .; Forshaw, J. M.; Tatayax, V .; Winters, R.; Groombridge, J. J. (2018). "A parakeet specimen held at National Museums Scotland is a unique skin of the extinct Réunion Parakeet Psittakula tenglamalari: a reply to Cheke and Jansen (2016)". Ibis. 161: 230–238. doi:10.1111/ibi.12673. O'qish uchun bepul
  13. ^ Jansen, J. J. F. J.; Cheke, A. S. (2020). "Martinet's engravings in Buffon (1770–83): variation in their hand-colouring and its implications for defining Echo Parakeet Psittacula eques (Boddaert, 1783)". Britaniya ornitologlar klubi byulleteni. 140 (3). doi:10.25226/bboc.v140i3.2020.a3. S2CID  221823940.
  14. ^ a b v d e f g h Yoqa, N .; de Juana, E .; Boesman, P. del Hoyo, J.; Elliott, A .; Sargatal, J .; Kristi, D.A .; de Juana, E. (tahrir). "Echo Parakeet (Psittakula tenglashadi)". Dunyo qushlari tirikligi to'g'risida qo'llanma. Lynx Edicions. Olingan 7 oktyabr 2018.
  15. ^ a b v d Groombridge, J. J.; Jons, C. G.; Nichols, R. A.; Carlton, M.; Bruford, M. W. (2004). "Molecular phylogeny and morphological change in the Psittakula parakeets". Molekulyar filogenetik va evolyutsiyasi. 31 (1): 96–108. doi:10.1016/j.ympev.2003.07.008. PMID  15019611.
  16. ^ a b Cheke, A. S.; Hume, J. P. (2008). Lost Land of the Dodo: an Ecological History of Mauritius, Réunion & Rodrigues. T. va A. D. Poyser. pp. 63–65, 172. ISBN  978-0-7136-6544-4.
  17. ^ Kundu, S .; Jons, C. G.; Pris-Jons, R. P.; Groombridge, J. J. (2011). "Hind okeanidagi to'tiqushlarning rivojlanishi (Psittaciformes): yo'q bo'lib ketish, moslashuvchan nurlanish va osoyishtalik". Molekulyar filogenetik va evolyutsiyasi. 62 (1): 296–305. doi:10.1016 / j.ympev.2011.09.025. PMID  22019932.
  18. ^ a b Jekson, X.; Jons, C. G.; Agapov, P. M.; Tatayax, V .; Groombridge, J. J. (2015). "Hind okeanidagi to'tiqushlar orasida mikro-evolyutsion diversifikatsiya: yo'qolib ketish va bosqinchilik natijasida filogenetik xilma-xillikning vaqt va fazoviy o'zgarishlari". Ibis. 157 (3): 496–510. doi:10.1111 / ibi.12275.
  19. ^ Cheke, Entoni S.; Jansen, Justin J. F. J. (2016). "An enigmatic parakeet – the disputed provenance of an Indian Ocean Psittakula". Ibis. 158 (2): 439–443. doi:10.1111/ibi.12347. O'qish uchun bepul
  20. ^ Hume, J. P. (2017). "Réunion ring-necked parakeet Psittakula tenglashadi". Yo'qolib ketgan qushlar (2 nashr). Bloomsbury Natural History. ISBN  978-1-4729-3744-5.
  21. ^ a b v d e f g h men j k l Forshou, J. M. (2017). Yo'qolib ketgan va yo'q bo'lib ketayotgan to'tiqushlar: yo'q bo'lib ketish va yo'qolib ketish xavfi ostida bo'lgan turlarni profilaktika qilish. CSIRO nashriyoti. 162–167 betlar. ISBN  978-0-643-09632-5.
  22. ^ Provost, Kaiya L.; Joseph, Leo; Smit, Brayan Tilston (2018). "Parrots uchun filogenetik gipotezani echish: sistematikadan konservatsiyaga ta'siri". Emu - Avstraliya ornitologiyasi. 118 (1): 7–21. doi:10.1080/01584197.2017.1387030. S2CID  52995298.
  23. ^ Braun, Maykl P.; Datsmann, Tomas; Arndt, Tomas; Reyshmidt, Matias; Shnitker, Xaynts; Bahr, Norbert; Zauer-Gyurt, Xedvig; Vink, Maykl (2019). "Psittacula sensu lato (Aves: Psittaciformes: Psittacidae: Psittacula, Psittinus, Tanygnathus, † Mascarinus) jinsining molekulyar filogeniyasi", taksonomik ta'sirga ega. Zootaxa. 4563 (3): 547. doi:10.11646 / zootaxa.4563.3.8. PMID  31716534.
  24. ^ Braun, M. P .; Bahr., N.; Wing, M. (2016). "Phylogenie und Taxonomie der Edelsittiche (Psittaciformes: Psittaculidae: Psittacula), mit Beschreibung von drei neuen Gattungen". Vogelvart (in German) (54): 322–324.
  25. ^ a b v d Jones, C. G. (1980). "Parrot on the Way to Extinction". Oryx. 15 (4): 350. doi:10.1017/S0030605300028829. O'qish uchun bepul
  26. ^ Home, J. F. M. (1987). "Vocalisations of the endemic land-birds of the Mascarene Islands". Olmosda A. V. (tahrir). Maskarene orolidagi qushlarni o'rganish. Kembrij universiteti matbuoti. 106-110 betlar. doi:10.1017/CBO9780511735769.005. ISBN  978-0-521-11331-1.
  27. ^ a b Raisin, C.; Frantz, A. C.; Kundu, S .; Greenwood, A. G.; Jons, C. G.; Zuel, N.; Groombridge, J. J. (2012). "Genetic consequences of intensive conservation management for the Mauritius parakeet". Tabiatni muhofaza qilish genetikasi. 13 (3): 707–715. doi:10.1007/s10592-012-0319-0. S2CID  15588437.
  28. ^ Cheke, A. S.; Jones, C. G. (1987). "Measurements and weights of the surviving endemic birds of the Mascarenes and their eggs". Olmosda A. V. (tahrir). Maskarene orolidagi qushlarni o'rganish. Kembrij universiteti matbuoti. pp. 404–413. doi:10.1017/CBO9780511735769.011. ISBN  978-0-521-11331-1.
  29. ^ Teylor, T. D .; Parkin, D. T. (2008). "Unbiased sex ratio among nestling echo parakeets Psittakula tenglashadi". Evolyutsion ekologiya tadqiqotlari. 10 (6): 907–912. ISSN  1522-0613. Arxivlandi asl nusxasidan 2017-08-11. Olingan 2019-02-17.
  30. ^ Teylor, T. D .; Parkin, D. T. (2009). "Preliminary evidence suggests extra-pair mating in the endangered echo parakeet, Psittakula tenglashadi". Afrika zoologiyasi. 44 (1): 71–74. doi:10.1080/15627020.2009.11407440. S2CID  219291732.
  31. ^ a b Kundu, S .; Folks, C. G.; Greenwood, A. G.; Jons, C. G.; Kayzer, P .; Lyne, O. D.; Black, S. A.; Chowrimootoo, A.; Groombridge, J. J. (2012). "Tracking viral evolution during a disease outbreak: the rapid and complete selective sweep of a circovirus in the endangered echo parakeet". Virusologiya jurnali. 86 (9): 5221–5229. doi:10.1128/JVI.06504-11. PMC  3347377. PMID  22345474.
  32. ^ Cheke, A. S. (1987). "The legacy of the dodo – conservation in Mauritius". Oryx. 21 (1): 29–36. doi:10.1017 / S0030605300020457.CS1 maint: ref = harv (havola)
  33. ^ Xyum, J. P .; Winters, R. (2015). "Captive birds on Dutch Mauritius: bad-tempered parrots, warty pigeons and notes on other native animals" (PDF). Tarixiy biologiya. 28 (6): 812–822. doi:10.1080/08912963.2015.1036750. S2CID  84473440. Arxivlandi asl nusxasi (PDF) 2019-06-20.
  34. ^ a b v d e f Goodall, J.; Hudson, G.; Maynard, T. (2009). "The Birds of Mauritius". Hope for Animals and Their World: How Endangered Species Are Being Rescued from the Brink. Grand Central Publishing. ISBN  978-0-446-58177-6.
  35. ^ a b v d "2007 IUCN Red List of Threatened Species – Extinction crisis escalates". Biologik xilma-xillik. 8 (3): 17–26. 2007. doi:10.1080/14888386.2007.9712825. S2CID  219600048.
  36. ^ "Black River Gorges National Parks". npcs.govmu.org. National Parks and Conservation Service. Arxivlandi asl nusxasidan 2018 yil 27 iyulda. Olingan 11 fevral 2019.
  37. ^ "More wild Echo Parakeets found". Issuu (8): 9. 1996.
  38. ^ Tatayah, R. V. V.; Malham, J.; Haverson, P.; Van de Wetering, J. (2007). "Design and provision of nest boxes for echo parakeets Psittakula tenglashadi in Black River Gorges National Park, Mauritius". Tabiatni muhofaza qilish dalillari. 4: 16–19. Arxivlandi asl nusxasidan 2019-02-17. Olingan 2019-02-17.
  39. ^ Harvey, F. (2019). "Flightless bird provides 'spark of hope' amid environmental crisis". Guardian. Olingan 10 dekabr 2019.
  40. ^ Sutherland, W. J .; Nyuton, I .; Green, R. E. (2004). Bird Ecology and Conservation: A Handbook of Techniques. Oksford universiteti matbuoti. p. 278. ISBN  978-0-19-852086-3.
  41. ^ Tatayah, R. V. V.; Malham, J.; Haverson, P. (2007). "The use of copper strips to exclude African giant land-snails Achatina spp. from echo parakeet Psittacula eques nest cavities, Black River Gorges National Park, Mauritius". Tabiatni muhofaza qilish dalillari. 4: 6–8. Arxivlandi asl nusxasidan 2019-02-17. Olingan 2019-02-17.

Tashqi havolalar