Teng imkoniyat - Equal opportunity

Teng imkoniyat sun'iy to'siqlar yoki xurofotlar yoki imtiyozlar bilan to'sqinlik qilmasdan, shaxslarga o'xshash munosabatda bo'ladigan adolat holatidir, faqat alohida farqlar aniq asoslanishi mumkin bo'lgan holatlar bundan mustasno.[1] Maqsad shundan iboratki, tashkilotdagi muhim ish joylari eng malakali odamlarga berilishi kerak - berilgan topshiriqni bajarishi mumkin bo'lgan shaxslar - va o'zboshimchalik bilan yoki ahamiyatsiz deb topilgan sabablarga ko'ra tug'ilish, tarbiya kabi holatlarga ko'ra odamlarga bormaslik kerak. , yaxshi ulangan qarindoshlar yoki do'stlar,[2] din, jinsiy aloqa,[3] millati,[3] irq, kasta,[4] yoki kabi beixtiyor shaxsiy xususiyatlar nogironlik, yoshi, jinsi o'ziga xosligi yoki jinsiy orientatsiyasi.[4][5]

Rivojlanish imkoniyati barcha qiziquvchilar uchun ochiq bo'lishi kerak,[6] shunday qilib ular "maqsadlar va belgilangan qoidalar tuzilishi doirasida raqobatlashish uchun teng imkoniyatga ega".[7][8] Maqsad, tanlov jarayonidagi o'zboshimchalikni olib tashlash va ba'zi bir "oldindan kelishilgan asoslarga asoslanishdir adolat, baholash jarayoni lavozim turiga bog'liqligi bilan "[2] va protsessual va huquqiy vositalarni ta'kidlash.[4][9] Shaxslar o'zlarining sa'y-harakatlari asosida muvaffaqiyatga erishishlari yoki muvaffaqiyatsiz bo'lishlari kerak, chunki ular yaxshi bog'langan ota-onalarga ega bo'lish kabi begona holatlarga emas.[10] Bunga qarshi qarindoshlik[2] va ijtimoiy tuzilmani qonuniy deb hisoblashda rol o'ynaydi.[2][4][11] Ushbu kontseptsiya ijtimoiy hayot sohalarida qo'llaniladi, unda foyda olish va olish kabi imtiyozlar olinadi ish bilan ta'minlash va ta'lim, garchi u boshqa ko'plab sohalarga ham tegishli bo'lishi mumkin. Teng imkoniyat - kontseptsiyasi uchun markaziy ahamiyatga ega meritokratiya.[12]

Turli xil siyosiy qarashlar

Barchaga teng imkoniyat: "Biz Xudoga qarshi kurashamiz, agar bizning Ijtimoiy Tizimimiz kambag'al odamning aqlli bolasini otasi bilan teng darajaga mahkum etsa", Admiral "Jeki" Fisher, Yozuvlar (1919)

Turli xil siyosiy qarashlarga ega bo'lgan odamlar ko'pincha kontseptsiyaga har xil qarashadi.[13] Teng imkoniyatlar ma'nosi siyosiy falsafa kabi sohalarda muhokama qilinadi, sotsiologiya va psixologiya. U bandlikdan tashqari tobora kengayib borayotgan sohalarda qo'llaniladi,[9][14] shu jumladan qarz berish,[15] uy-joy, kollejga kirish, ovoz berish huquqi va boshqa narsalar.[1] Klassik ma'noda imkoniyatlar tengligi tushunchasi bilan chambarchas bog'liqdir qonun oldida tenglik va g'oyalari meritokratiya.[16]

Odatda, shartlar imkoniyatlarning tengligi va teng imkoniyat o'zgaruvchan, vaqti-vaqti bilan ozgina farqlar mavjud; birinchisi mavhum siyosiy tushunchaga ega bo'lish tuyg'usiga ega, "teng imkoniyat" ba'zan ish beruvchini, yollash uslubini yoki qonunni aniqlash uchun, odatda, ish bilan ta'minlash to'g'risidagi qoidalar tarkibida sifat sifatida ishlatiladi. Teng imkoniyatlar to'g'risidagi qoidalar me'yoriy hujjatlarga kiritilgan va sud zallarida muhokama qilingan.[17] Ba'zida u a kabi tasavvur qilinadi qonuniy huquq qarshi kamsitish.[4][18][19] Bu tobora keng tarqalib borayotgan idealdir[20] so'nggi bir necha asrlarda G'arb davlatlarida va ular bilan chambarchas bog'liq ijtimoiy harakatchanlik, ko'pincha yuqoriga qarab harakatlanish va bilan boylik uchun latta hikoyalar:

Kelajakdagi Frantsiya Prezidenti poyabzalchining nabirasi. Haqiqiy Prezident dehqonning o'g'li. Uning salafi yana dengizchilikda kamtarona hayotni boshladi. Eski xalqda yangi tartib ostida imkoniyatlar tengligi shubhasiz.[21]

Nazariya

Kontseptsiya

Zavod sharoitida imkoniyatlarning tengligi ko'pincha "agar siz ikki baravar ko'p lampalarni yig'sangiz, sizga ikki baravar to'lanadi" yo'nalishi bo'yicha protsessual adolat sifatida qaraladi va bu ma'noda kontseptsiya kontseptsiyadan farqli o'laroq natija tengligi Bu esa, barcha ishchilar qancha lampalar ishlab chiqarilganligidan qat'i nazar, shunga o'xshash maosh olishlarini talab qilishi mumkin

Ga ko'ra Stenford falsafa entsiklopediyasi, kontseptsiya jamiyatning turli xil rollari bilan tabaqalanishini nazarda tutadi, ularning ba'zilari boshqalarga qaraganda ko'proq orzu qiladi.[2] Imkoniyatlar tengligining foydasi - orzu qilingan rollarni tanlash jarayonida adolatli bo'lishdir korporatsiyalar, uyushmalar, notijorat tashkilotlar, universitetlar va boshqa joylarda.[22] Bir qarashga ko'ra, imkoniyatlar tengligi va siyosiy tuzilish o'rtasida imkoniyatlar tengligi bo'lishi mumkin degan ma'noda "rasmiy bog'lanish" mavjud emas. demokratik davlatlar, avtokratiyalar va kommunistik millatlar,[2] garchi u birinchi navbatda a bilan bog'liq bo'lsa raqobatbardosh bozor iqtisodiyot[2] va demokratik jamiyatlarning huquqiy doirasiga kiritilgan.[23] Turli xil siyosiy qarashlarga ega insonlar imkoniyatlar tengligini turlicha ko'rishadi: liberallar uni ta'minlash uchun qanday shartlar zarurligi to'g'risida kelishmovchiliklar va ko'plab "eski uslub" konservatorlar tengsizlikni va umuman ierarxiyani an'analarga hurmat tufayli foydali deb bilishadi.[24] Bu ma'lum bir ishga qabul qilish to'g'risidagi qarorga yoki ma'lum bir kompaniya tomonidan qabul qilingan barcha qarorlarga yoki butun millat uchun yollash to'g'risidagi qarorlarni tartibga soluvchi qoidalarga taalluqli bo'lishi mumkin. Teng imkoniyatlar doirasi ozchilik guruhlarining huquqlari bilan bog'liq muammolarni qamrab olgan holda kengayib bordi, ammo "yollash, yollash, o'qitish, ishdan bo'shatish, ishdan bo'shatish, chaqirib olish, lavozimdan ko'tarish, javobgarlik, ish haqi, kasallik ta'tillari, ta'til, ishdan tashqari vaqt, sug'urta , pensiya, pensiya va boshqa turli xil imtiyozlar ".[22]

Kontseptsiya jamoat hayotining ko'plab jihatlariga, shu jumladan saylov uchastkalarining mavjudligiga,[25] parvarishlash OIV bemorlar,[26] erkaklar va ayollar kosmik kemada sayohat qilish uchun teng imkoniyatlarga ega bo'ladimi,[27] ikki tilli ta'lim,[28] modellarining teri rangi Braziliya,[29] siyosiy nomzodlar uchun televizion vaqt,[30] armiya aktsiyalari,[31] universitetlarga kirish[32] va Amerika Qo'shma Shtatlaridagi millat.[33] Bu atama boshqa tenglik tushunchalari bilan o'zaro bog'liq va ko'pincha ularga zid keladi natija tengligi va avtonomiyaning tengligi. Teng imkoniyat, shaxsning ijtimoiy ehtiros yoki irq yoki katta oila kabi guruhga a'zo bo'lishiga asoslangan fazilatlarini emas, balki uning shaxsiy ambitsiyalari va iste'dodi va qobiliyatlarini ta'kidlaydi.[4] Bundan tashqari, agar insonning ta'siridan tashqarida bo'lgan tashqi omillar u bilan sodir bo'lgan narsalarga sezilarli ta'sir ko'rsatsa, bu adolatsiz deb hisoblanadi.[4] Keyin teng imkoniyat adolatli jarayonni ta'kidlaydi, aksincha natija tengligi adolatli natijani ta'kidlaydi.[4] Sotsiologik tahlilda teng imkoniyat ijobiy korrelyatsiya qiluvchi omil sifatida qaraladi ijtimoiy harakatchanlik, bu farovonlikni maksimal darajada oshirish orqali umuman jamiyatga foyda keltirishi mumkin degan ma'noda.[4]

Turli xil turlari

Imkoniyatlar tengligi ostida turli xil tushunchalar mavjud.[34][20][35][36]

Imkoniyatlarning rasmiy tengligi to'g'ridan-to'g'ri kamsitishning etishmasligi (adolatsiz). Buning uchun ataylab kamsitish tegishli va meritokratik bo'lishi kerak. Masalan, ish bilan suhbatlar faqat ish layoqatsizligi uchun murojaat etuvchilarni kamsitishi kerak. Universitetlar o'qish uchun to'lovni to'lay olmaydigan, ko'proq qobiliyatli abituriyent o'rniga kam qobiliyatli abituriyentni qabul qilmasligi kerak.

Imkoniyatlarning mohiyatan tengligi bilvosita kamsitishning yo'qligi. Bu jamiyat adolatli va meritokratik bo'lishini talab qiladi. Masalan, odam ishda o'lishi ehtimoli yuqori bo'lmasligi kerak, chunki ular mehnat qonunchiligi buzilgan mamlakatda tug'ilgan. Hech kim maktabni tashlab ketmasligi kerak, chunki ularning oilasi doimiy ish bilan ta'minlaydigan yoki ish haqi oluvchiga muhtoj.

Imkoniyatlarning rasmiy tengligi, imkoniyatlarning mohiyatan tengligini anglatmaydi. Homilador bo'lgan har qanday xodimni ishdan bo'shatish rasmiy ravishda tengdir, ammo bu asosan ayollarga ko'proq zarar keltiradi.

Moddiy tengsizlikni hal qilish ko'pincha qiyinroq bo'ladi. Rasmiy ravishda har qanday kishiga qo'shilishga ruxsat beradigan, ammo jamoat transportidan uzoq bo'lgan, nogironlar aravachasi bo'lmagan binoda uchrashadigan siyosiy partiya, yoshi ham, qari ham a'zolarini kamsitadi, chunki ular mehnatga layoqatli avtomobil egalari bo'lish ehtimoli kam. Ammo, agar partiya yaxshiroq binoga ega bo'lish uchun a'zolik badallarini oshirsa, bu uning o'rniga kambag'al a'zolarni tushkunlikka soladi. Maxsus ehtiyojlari va nogironligi bo'lgan shaxslarni bajarishi qiyin bo'lgan ish joyini moddiy tengsizlikning bir turi deb hisoblash mumkin, ammo nogironlarning muvaffaqiyatga erishishini osonlashtirish uchun ishni qayta qurish ishlari amalga oshirilishi mumkin. Universitetlarga imtiyozli ravishda qabul qilish rasman adolatli, ammo agar u amalda ayollarni va qimmat pullik maktablarini bitiruvchilarini tanlasa, bu erkaklar va kambag'allarga nisbatan adolatsizdir. Adolatsizlik allaqachon ro'y bergan va universitet unga qarshi muvozanatni saqlashni tanlashi mumkin, ammo, ehtimol, u o'z-o'zidan universitetgacha bo'lgan imkoniyatlarni tenglashtira olmaydi. Ijtimoiy harakatchanlik va Buyuk Getsbi egri chizig'i ko'pincha imkoniyat tengligining ko'rsatkichi sifatida ishlatiladi.[37]

Ikkala tenglik tushunchasi, agar begona omillar odamlar hayotini boshqarsa, bu adolatsiz va samarasiz deb aytadi. Ikkalasi ham tegishli, meritokratik omillarga asoslangan adolatli tengsizlikni qabul qiladi. Ular ularni targ'ib qilishda qo'llaniladigan usullar doirasi bilan farq qiladi.

Imkoniyatlarning rasmiy tengligi

Imkoniyatlarning rasmiy tengligi[34][38] ba'zida diskriminatsiya tamoyili deb yuritiladi[39] yoki to'g'ridan-to'g'ri kamsitishning yo'qligi deb ta'riflangan,[34] yoki tor ma'noda kirishning tengligi sifatida tavsiflanadi.[34][40] Bu quyidagilar bilan tavsiflanadi:

  1. Ochiq qo'ng'iroq. Yuqori ustunliklarga ega bo'lgan lavozimlar barcha talabnoma beruvchilar uchun ochiq bo'lishi kerak[20] va bo'sh ish joylari oldindan e'lon qilinishi kerak, ariza beruvchilarga "munosib imkoniyat" berishlari kerak. Bundan tashqari, barcha arizalar qabul qilinishi kerak.[2]
  2. Adolatli hukm. Arizalar ularning mohiyati bo'yicha baholanishi kerak,[2] eng yaxshi malakaga ega bo'lganlarni aniqlashga mo'ljallangan protseduralar bilan.[20] Abituriyentni baholash lavozim vazifalariga va xor direktorining ish ochilishiga mos kelishi kerak, masalan, baholash abituriyentlarni soch rangi kabi ba'zi bir o'zboshimchalik mezonlariga emas, balki musiqiy bilimlarga qarab baholashi mumkin.[2]
  3. Ariza tanlandi. "Eng malakali" deb topilgan talabnoma beruvchiga lavozim taklif etiladi, boshqalari esa yo'q. Jarayon natijasi yana tengsiz, ya'ni bir kishi mavqega ega, boshqasi esa mavqega ega emas, ammo protsessual asoslarda bu natija adolatli deb topilganligi to'g'risida kelishuv mavjud.

Rasmiy yondashuv biroz "oddiy" yoki "tor" sifatida qaraladi[4] imkoniyatlar tengligiga yondashish, minimal darajadagi standart, cheklangan jamoat sohasi kabi xususiy maydonlardan farqli o'laroq oila, nikoh, yoki din.[4] "Odil" va "adolatsiz" deb hisoblangan narsalar oldindan yozib qo'yilgan.[41] Ushbu versiyaning ifodasi paydo bo'ldi The New York Times: "Hamma uchun teng imkoniyat bo'lishi kerak. Har bir insonda keyingi imkoniyat kabi katta yoki kichik imkoniyat bo'lishi kerak. Bir kishining boshqasiga nisbatan adolatsiz, tengsiz, ustun imkoniyati bo'lmasligi kerak."[42]

Rasmiy kontseptsiya tanlov paytida protsessual adolatga e'tibor beradi: to'siqlar bir xil balandlikda bo'ladimi? (rasm: sportchilar Ulrike Urbanskiy va Mishel Keri Osakada)

Bu ma'no ham ifoda etilgan iqtisodchilar Milton va Rose Fridman ularning 1980 yilgi kitobida Tanlash uchun bepul.[43] Fridmans, imkoniyatlarning tengligi, "ba'zi bolalar ko'zi ojiz bo'lib tug'ilsa, boshqalari ko'zi ojiz tug'ilishi sababli" so'zma-so'z talqin qilinmasligi "kerakligini tushuntirdi, ammo" uning asl ma'nosi ... iste'dodlar uchun ochiq mansabdir ".[43] Bu shuni anglatadiki, inson o'z ambitsiyalarini ro'yobga chiqarishiga to'sqinlik qiladigan "o'zboshimchalik bilan to'siqlar bo'lmasligi kerak": "Tug'ilish, millat, rang, din, jins va boshqa ahamiyatsiz xususiyatlar inson uchun ochiq bo'lgan imkoniyatlarni belgilamasligi kerak - faqat uning qobiliyatlari ".[43]

Bir oz boshqacha fikr bildirilgan Jon Rimer, bu atamani kim ishlatgan diskriminatsiya tamoyili "ko'rib chiqilayotgan lavozim vazifalarini bajarishi uchun tegishli bo'lgan atributlarga ega bo'lgan barcha shaxslar munosib nomzodlar qatoriga kiritilishi va shaxsning ushbu lavozimni egallashi mumkin bo'lgan xususiyatlar faqat shu tegishli xususiyatlarga nisbatan baholanishi" degan ma'noni anglatadi. .[39] Mett Kavanag Ishga kirishda irq va jins muhim emas, ammo imkoniyatlarning tengligi tuyg'usi to'g'ridan-to'g'ri kamsitishni oldini olishdan ko'ra ko'proq tarqalmasligi kerak, degan fikrni ilgari surdi.[44]

Qonun chiqaruvchilar uchun bir guruhni boshqasidan ustun qo'yish va natijada imkoniyatlar tengligini rag'batlantirish bo'yicha ochiq-oydin harakatlarni taqiqlash nisbatan aniq vazifadir. Yaponiya shuningdek, reklama sohasida taqiqlangan jinsga oid lavozim ta'riflari jinsiy kamsitish ish bilan ta'minlashda va adolatsiz deb topilgan boshqa amaliyotlarda,[45] garchi keyingi hisobotda ushbu qonun yapon ayollarini menejmentdagi yuqori lavozimlarni ta'minlashda minimal ta'sir ko'rsatayotgani taxmin qilingan.[46][yangilanishga muhtoj ] In Qo'shma Shtatlar, Teng ish bilan ta'minlash bo'yicha teng komissiya oddiy askarni sudga bergan testga tayyorgarlik qat'iy, Kaplan, kredit tarixini kamsitishda adolatsiz foydalanganligi uchun Afroamerikaliklar ishga qabul qilish bo'yicha qarorlar nuqtai nazaridan.[17] Bir tahlilga ko'ra, rasmiy mezonlarga javob beradigan (1 dan 3 gacha), ammo baribir erkin va adolatli saylovlarda tanlangan badavlat nomzodlarni qo'llab-quvvatlaydigan demokratiyani tasavvur qilish mumkin.[47]

Imkoniyatlarning mohiyatan tengligi

Imkoniyatlarning mohiyatan tengligi
The Buyuk Getsbi egri chizig'i ko'proq boylik tengligi bo'lgan mamlakatlarda ko'proq ijtimoiy harakatchanlik mavjudligini ko'rsatadi, bu boylik tengligi va imkoniyatlar tengligi birgalikda bo'lishidan dalolat beradi:[37]

Agar yuqoriroq tengsizlik avlodlararo harakatchanlikni qiyinlashtirsa, ehtimol, iqtisodiy taraqqiyot imkoniyatlari bolalar o'rtasida tengsiz taqsimlangan.[48]

Ba'zan imkoniyatlarning adolatli tengligi deb ataladigan imkoniyatlarning mohiyatan tengligi,[20] biroz kengroq[4] va imkoniyatlarning cheklangan rasmiy tengligidan ko'ra kengroq kontseptsiya va u ba'zida bilvosita diskriminatsiya deb ta'riflanadigan narsalar bilan shug'ullanadi.[34] Bu uzoqroq ketadi va munozarali[4] rasmiy variantdan ko'ra; va qanday qilib katta tenglikka erishish haqida ko'proq kelishmovchiliklar bilan erishish ancha qiyin deb o'ylangan;[4] va "beqaror" deb ta'riflangan,[20] ayniqsa, agar ushbu jamiyat boylikning katta nomutanosibligi nuqtai nazaridan boshlash uchun tengsiz bo'lsa.[49] Bu ko'proq chapparast siyosiy pozitsiya sifatida aniqlandi,[50] ammo bu qiyin va tezkor qoida emas. Moddiy modelni rasmiy modeldagi cheklovlarni ko'radigan odamlar himoya qiladi:

Bu erda hamma uchun teng imkoniyatlar g'oyasi yotadi. Ba'zi odamlar imkoniyatlardan foydalanish uchun yaxshiroq joylashtirilgan.

— Debora Orr Guardian, 2009[51]

Daromadning harakatchanligi kam - Amerika imkoniyatlar mamlakati degan tushuncha afsonadir.

— Jozef E. Stiglitz, 2012 yil[52]

Moddiy yondashuvda, musobaqa boshlanishidan oldin boshlang'ich nuqta adolatsizdir, chunki odamlar hatto musobaqaga yaqinlashishdan oldin turli xil tajribalarni boshdan kechirishgan. Moddiy yondashuv lavozimga murojaat etishdan oldin abituriyentlarning o'zlarini tekshiradi va ularning qobiliyatlari yoki iqtidorlari tengligini baholaydi; va agar yo'q bo'lsa, unda vakolatxonalar (odatda hukumat) ariza beruvchilarni lavozim uchun raqobatlashadigan darajaga yetguncha ularni tenglashtirish uchun choralar ko'rishni taklif qiladi va ba'zida boshlang'ich nuqtadagi muammolarni hal qiladi "malakaga adolatli kirish" tomon.[20] Tengsizliklarni, ehtimol ba'zan "o'tmishdagi xurofotga" asoslangan "adolatsiz kamchilik" tufayli bartaraf etishga intiladi.[9]

Jon Xillzning so'zlariga ko'ra, boy va bir-biri bilan yaxshi aloqada bo'lgan ota-onalarning farzandlari odatda boshqa turdagi bolalarga nisbatan qat'iy ustunlikka ega va u "afzallik va kamchiliklar o'zlarini hayot aylanish jarayonida kuchaytiradi va ko'pincha keyingi avlodga ta'sir qiladi", shuning uchun muvaffaqiyatli ota-onalar o'zlarining boyliklari va bilimlarini keyingi avlodlarga etkazish, boshqalarga ijtimoiy zinapoyadan ko'tarilishni qiyinlashtirish.[53] Biroq, raqobat boshlanishidan oldin kam ta'minlangan odamni tezlashtirishga qaratilgan ijobiy harakatlar deb nomlangan harakatlar baholash boshlanishidan oldingi vaqt bilan cheklangan. O'sha paytda "lavozimlar uchun yakuniy tanlov ish uchun eng yaxshi odam printsipiga muvofiq amalga oshirilishi kerak", ya'ni malakasi pastroq bo'lgan abituriyent yuqori malakali abituriyent tanlanmasligi kerak.[34] Shuningdek, nüanslı qarashlar ham mavjud: bitta pozitsiya raqobat natijalariga ko'ra teng bo'lmagan natijalar, agar omadsizlik sabab bo'lgan bo'lsa, adolatsiz, lekin agar shaxs o'zi tanlagan bo'lsa va shaxsiy mas'uliyat kabi masalalarni tortish muhim bo'lgan degan fikrni ilgari surdi. Moddiy modelning ushbu varianti ba'zan chaqirilgan omad tengligi.[20] Nuanslardan qat'i nazar, umumiy g'oya hali ham omadli bo'lmagan bolalarga ko'proq imkoniyat berishdir,[53] yoki boshida ba'zi nazariyotchilar shartlarning tengligi deb atagan narsalarga erishish.[34] Yozuvchi Xa-Jun Chang shunday fikr bildirdi:

Raqobat jarayoni natijalarini adolatli deb qabul qilishimiz mumkin, faqat ishtirokchilar asosiy imkoniyatlar tengligiga ega bo'lsagina; hech kimning boshlanishiga yo'l qo'yilmasligi, agar ba'zi ishtirokchilarning bitta oyog'i bo'lsa, poyga adolatli bo'lmaydi.[54]

Uchish-qo'nish yo'lagi modellarining terisi rangi to'g'risida teng imkoniyatlar to'g'risida muammolar ko'tarildi San-Paulu moda haftaligi va 2009 yilda bitta hisobotga binoan, "oq modellarga qarshi" qarashga qarshi kurashishning muhim usuli sifatida modellarning kamida 10 foizini "qora yoki mahalliy" bo'lishini talab qiladigan kvotalar belgilandi.[29]

Ma'lum ma'noda imkoniyatlarning tengligi "boshlang'ich nuqtani" o'tmishda orqaga qaytaradi. Ba'zan bu foydalanishni o'z ichiga oladi tasdiqlovchi harakat barcha da'vogarlar boshlang'ich nuqtaga kelguniga qadar teng bo'lishiga yordam beradigan siyosat, ehtimol ko'proq tayyorgarlik ko'rish yoki ba'zan resurslarni qayta taqsimlash orqali qoplash yoki soliq solish da'vogarlarni yanada tenglashtirish uchun. Bu "malakali bo'lish uchun haqiqiy imkoniyat" ga ega bo'lganlarning barchasiga buni amalga oshirish imkoniyatini beradi va ba'zida adolatsizlik mavjudligini tan olishga va to'sqinlik qilishga asoslanadi. ijtimoiy harakatchanlik, adolatsizlik mavjud bo'lmasligi yoki qandaydir tarzda kamaytirilishi kerakligi hissi bilan birlashtirilgan.[55] Bir misol, jangchi jamiyat kambag'al bolalarga maxsus oziq-ovqat qo'shimchalarini etkazib berishi, harbiy akademiyalarga stipendiyalar taklif qilishi va har bir qishloqqa "jangovar mahorat murabbiylari" ni yuborishi imkoniyatni yanada adolatli qilish yo'lidir.[2] Ushbu g'oya shuhratparast va iste'dodli yoshlarga tug'ilish sharoitlaridan qat'i nazar, sovrinli o'rinlar uchun kurashish imkoniyatini berishdir.[2]

Moddiy yondashuv ishga qabul qilish qaroridan chetda qolishi kerak bo'lgan begona holatlarning kengroq ta'rifiga ega. Bir tahririyat muallifi, yollash to'g'risida qaror qabul qilinmasligi kerak bo'lgan begona holatlarning ko'p turlari orasida shaxsiy go'zallik, ba'zan esa "tashqi ko'rinish ":

Lookuzizm odamlarni qobiliyatlari yoki xizmatlariga emas, balki jismoniy jozibalariga qarab baholaydi. Bu tabiiy ravishda tashqi ko'rinish bo'limida yuqori o'rinlarni egallagan odamlar foydasiga ishlaydi. Ular boshqalar hisobiga imtiyozli davolanishadi. Qaysi adolatli, demokratik tizim buni oqlay oladi? Agar biror narsa bo'lsa, qarashizm jamiyat sotib oladigan kasta, e'tiqod, jins va irqqa asoslangan har qanday boshqa tarafkashlik shakli singari hiyla-nayrangdir. Bu imkoniyatlarning tengligi printsipiga zid keladi.[56]

Moddiy pozitsiya tarafdori bo'lgan Bxixu Parek 2000 yilda Multikulturalizmni qayta ko'rib chiqish, unda u "barcha fuqarolar jamiyatda ishlash va o'zlari tanlagan maqsadlarni teng ravishda samarali bajarish uchun zarur bo'lgan imkoniyatlar va ko'nikmalarga ega bo'lish uchun teng imkoniyatlardan foydalanishlari kerak" va "tenglashtiruvchi choralar adolatli va ijtimoiy jihatdan ham oqlanadi" deb yozgan. integratsiya va hamjihatlik "mavzusida.[34][57] Parekhning ta'kidlashicha, teng imkoniyatlarga "tan olish siyosati bilan ta'minlanadigan" madaniy huquqlar kiradi.[34]

Tasdiqlovchi harakat dasturlar odatda moddiy toifaga kiradi.[4] Ushbu g'oya nochor guruhlarga uzoq vaqtdan so'ng normal boshlang'ich holatiga qaytishiga yordam berishdan iborat kamsitish. Dasturlar hukumat harakatlarini o'z ichiga oladi, ba'zida resurslar imtiyozli guruhdan kambag'al guruhga o'tkaziladi va ushbu dasturlar majburiy asosga ko'ra oqlanadi. kvotalar o'tmishdagi diskriminatsiyani muvozanatlashtiradi[2] shuningdek, jamiyatdagi xilma-xillikka "majburiy davlat manfaati" bo'lish.[4] Masalan, unda bir holat bo'lgan San-Paulu yilda Braziliya uchun belgilangan kvota San-Paulu moda haftaligi "uzoq vaqtdan beri oq tanlilarga nisbatan noto'g'ri munosabatda bo'lish" ga qarshi majburlash chorasi sifatida "modellarning kamida 10 foizini qora yoki mahalliy bo'lishini" talab qilish.[58] Buni hukumat tomonidan amalga oshirilishi shart emas: masalan, 1980-yillarda AQShda Prezident Ronald Reygan demontaj qilingan harakatlarning qismlarini, lekin bitta xabar Chicago Tribune kompaniyalar hukumat talablaridan qat'i nazar, teng imkoniyatlar printsipiga sodiq qolishni taklif qildi.[59] Boshqa bir misolda, yuqori sinf o'quvchilari Scholastic qobiliyat sinovi ichida Qo'shma Shtatlar "bu sinovga tayyorgarlik ko'rish uchun boshqalarnikiga qaraganda ko'proq iqtisodiy va ta'lim resurslari" bo'lganligi sababli yaxshiroq ishlashdi.[4] Sinovning o'zi rasmiy ma'noda adolatli deb topildi, ammo umumiy natija baribir adolatsiz deb topildi. Yilda Hindiston, Hindiston texnologiya institutlari Imkoniyatlarning teng ravishda teng bo'lishiga erishish uchun maktab "tarixiy jihatdan noqulay tabaqalar va qabilalar" dan abituriyentlar uchun joylarning 22,5 foizini ajratishi kerak edi.[4][60] Elita universitetlari Frantsiya abituriyentlarga "qashshoq shahar atrofi" dan yordam berish uchun maxsus "kirish dasturi" ni boshladi.[4]

Odil imkoniyatlarning tengligi

Faylasuf Jon Rols imkoniyatlarning mohiyatan tengligi uchun ushbu variantni taklif qildi va bu bir xil "mahalliy iste'dod va bir xil ambitsiyaga" ega bo'lgan shaxslar musobaqalarda muvaffaqiyatga erishishning bir xil istiqbollariga ega bo'lganda sodir bo'lishini tushuntirdi.[2][61][62][63] Gordon Marshal "o'xshash qobiliyatli shaxslar xizmatga teng kirish huquqiga ega bo'lgan barcha sharoitlarda pozitsiyalar ochiq bo'lishi kerak" degan so'zlar bilan o'xshash ko'rinishni taklif qiladi.[24] Masalan, agar X va Y ikkita shaxs bir xil iste'dodga ega bo'lsa, lekin X kambag'al oiladan, Y boydan bo'lgan bo'lsa, adolatli imkoniyatlarning tengligi X va Y ikkalasi ham g'olib chiqish imkoniyatiga ega bo'lganda amal qiladi. ish.[2] Bu ideal jamiyat "sinfsiz" degan ma'noni anglatadi, chunki ijtimoiy ierarxiya avloddan avlodga o'tmaydi, garchi ota-onalar hali ham o'z farzandlariga afzalliklarini berishlari mumkin genetika va ijtimoiylashuv ko'nikmalar.[2] Bir qarashga ko'ra, ushbu yondashuv "oilaviy hayotga invaziv aralashuv" ni himoya qilishi mumkin.[2] Marshall bu savolni berdi:

Ularning qobiliyatlari teng bo'lmagan taqdirda ham, odamlar o'z maqsadlariga erishish uchun teng huquqli bo'lishlarini talab qiladimi? Bu shuni anglatadiki, konsert pianistoni bo'lishni xohlaydigan musiqiy bo'lmagan shaxs, vondiliydan ko'ra ko'proq ta'lim olishi kerak.[24]

Iqtisodchi Pol Krugman bilan asosan rozi Ravlsian u "agar biz kim ekanligimizni oldindan bilmasak, har birimiz xohlagan jamiyatni yaratishni" xohlagan yondashuv.[64] Krugman batafsil bayon qildi: "Agar siz hayot adolatsiz ekanligini tan olsangiz va boshlang'ich chiziqda bu borada juda ko'p narsa qilishingiz mumkin bo'lsa, unda siz bu adolatsizlik oqibatlarini yaxshilashga harakat qilishingiz mumkin".[64]

Bir xil o'yin maydoni

O'yin natijalari qonuniy hisoblanadi, agar teng sharoitlar mavjud bo'lsa va qoidalar ikkala o'yinchiga yoki jamoaga o'zboshimchalik qilmasa (foto: Sesk Fabregas bilan duellar Anderson a futbol 2008 yildagi o'yin)

Ba'zi nazariyotchilar teng imkoniyatlar tengligi kontseptsiyasini yaratdilar,[2][20] moddiy printsipga ko'p jihatdan o'xshash (garchi u imkoniyatlarning rasmiy tengligini tavsiflash uchun turli xil sharoitlarda ishlatilgan bo'lsa ham)[9] va bu mavzuga oid asosiy g'oyadir tarqatuvchi adolat tomonidan qo'llab-quvvatlangan Jon Rimer[39][65][66] va Ronald Dvorkin[67][68] va boshqalar. Moddiy tushunchalar singari, teng sharoitlar kontseptsiyasi odatdagi rasmiy yondashuvdan uzoqroq.[39] G'oya shundan iboratki, dastlabki "tanlanmagan tengsizliklar" - shaxs tomonidan boshqarib bo'lmaydigan, ammo ma'lum bir lavozim uchun ma'lum bir musobaqada uning muvaffaqiyatiga ta'sir ko'rsatadigan oldingi holatlar - bu tanlanmagan tengsizliklarni iloji boricha yo'q qilish kerak kontseptsiya. Roemerning fikriga ko'ra, jamiyat "munosib salohiyatga ega bo'lganlarning barchasi oxir-oqibat lavozimlar uchun raqobatlashayotgan nomzodlar havzalariga qabul qilinishi uchun o'yin maydonini tenglashtirish uchun qo'lidan kelganicha harakat qilishi kerak".[39] Keyinchalik, biron bir shaxs ma'lum bir lavozim uchun raqobatlashganda, u kelajakdagi tengsizlikni keltirib chiqaradigan aniq tanlovlarni amalga oshirishi mumkin - va bu tengsizliklar avvalgi adolat prezumptsiyasi tufayli qabul qilinadi.[69] Ushbu tizim jamiyatning rollarni taqsimlashining qonuniyligini, natijada ma'lum bir tengsizlikni "axloqiy jihatdan maqbul" qilishini anglatadi.[2] Ushbu kontseptsiya ba'zi mutafakkirlarning mazmunli versiyasiga qarama-qarshi bo'lib, odatda jamiyatning yoshlarga bunday sohalarda qanday munosabatda bo'lishiga ta'sir qiladi. ta'lim va ijtimoiylashuv va Sog'liqni saqlash, ammo bu kontseptsiya ham tanqid qilindi.[70][71][72] Jon Rols postulyatsiyalangan farq printsipi "tengsizliklar faqatgina eng yomon ahvolni yaxshilash uchun kerak bo'lganda, masalan, iste'dodli odamlarga boylik yaratishga turtki berish orqali oqlanadi", deb ta'kidlagan.[34][24][68]

Meritokratiya

Ushbu turli xil tushunchalar orasida atama bilan bir-biriga o'xshashlik mavjud meritokratiya bu kabi omillarni individual ravishda mukofotlaydigan ma'muriy tizimni tavsiflaydi aql, ishonch yorliqlari, ta'lim, axloq, bilim yoki loyiqligiga ishonadigan boshqa mezonlar. Imkoniyatlarning tengligi ko'pincha meritokratiyaning asosiy yo'nalishi sifatida qaraladi.[34][2] Fikrlardan biri shundaki, imkoniyatlar tengligi ko'proq musobaqa boshlanishidan oldin sodir bo'ladigan narsalarga qaratilgan bo'lsa, meritokratiya raqobat bosqichida adolatga ko'proq e'tibor beradi.[73] Atama meritokratiya salbiy ma'noda, elita o'zlarining maqomiga erishishni nazorat qilish orqali hokimiyatni ushlab turadigan tizimga murojaat qilish uchun ishlatilishi mumkin (ta'lim olish, tajribaga kirish yoki baholash yoki hukm qilishda tarafkashlik orqali).

Axloqiy hislar

Imkoniyatlarning tengligi jamiyat uchun foydalidir degan umumiy kelishuv mavjud, garchi bu qanday ekanligi haqida turli xil fikrlar mavjud qiymatni baholash.[24] U odatda mavhum ma'noda ijobiy siyosiy ideal sifatida qaraladi.[2] Imkoniyatlarning tengligi bo'lmagan mamlakatlarda bu salbiy ta'sir ko'rsatishi mumkin iqtisodiy o'sish, ba'zi qarashlarga va bitta hisobotga ko'ra Al-Jazira buni taklif qildi Misr, Tunis va boshqalar Yaqin Sharq teng imkoniyatlar kamligi sababli millatlar qisman iqtisodiy jihatdan turg'unlashayotgan edi.[74] Teng imkoniyat printsipi tushunchalariga zid bo'lishi mumkin meritokratiya sharoitda individual farqlar inson qobiliyatlarida asosan belgilanadi deb ishoniladi genetika chunki bunday sharoitda bunday vaziyatlarda adolatga qanday erishish mumkinligi to'g'risida ziddiyatlar bo'lishi mumkin.[75]

Amaliy fikrlar

Amalga oshirish bilan bog'liq qiyinchiliklar

Imkoniyatlarning muayyan turlarini amalga oshirish dasturlari qiyin bo'lishi mumkinligi va bitta natijaga erishish uchun qilingan harakatlar ko'pincha kutilmagan oqibatlarga olib kelishi yoki boshqa muammolarni keltirib chiqarishi to'g'risida umumiy kelishuv mavjud. Rasmiy yondashuv boshqalarga qaraganda osonroq ekanligi to'g'risida kelishuv mavjud, ammo u erda ham qiyinchiliklar mavjud.

Teng munosabatni talab qiladigan hukumat siyosati qonun chiqaruvchilarga muammo tug'dirishi mumkin. Hukumatning barcha fuqarolarga tibbiy xizmatni teng ravishda ko'rsatishi talablari juda qimmatga tushishi mumkin. Agar hukumat pulni tejashga harakat qilish uchun maximallashtirish modelidan foydalangan holda xizmatlarni tariflash orqali fuqarolarga tibbiy yordam olish imkoniyatlari tengligini izlasa, yangi qiyinchiliklar paydo bo'lishi mumkin. Masalan, sog'liqni saqlashni ratsionalizatsiya qilish uchun "sifatni hisobga olgan holda hayot yillarini" ko'paytirish nogironlar, agar ular bitta loyiqroq bo'lsa ham, pulni ularni olib qo'yishi mumkin.[2][76] Boshqa bir misolda, BBC News armiya chaqiriluvchilaridan erkaklar hamkasblari singari og'ir sinovlardan o'tishini so'rash oqilona bo'ladimi degan savol tug'dirdi, chunki ko'plab ayollar jarohat olishdi.[77]

Yoshga oid kamsitishlar teng imkoniyatlarni qo'lga kiritishga intilayotgan siyosatchilar uchun qiyin muammolarni keltirib chiqarishi mumkin.[2][78][79] Bir necha tadqiqotlarga ko'ra, yoshga ham, keksaga ham bir xilda adolatli bo'lishga urinishlar muammoli, chunki keksa yoshdagi odamning umri tugashiga ozroq vaqt qolgan va jamiyat uchun yosh odamning sog'lig'i uchun ko'proq mablag 'sarflash mantiqan to'g'ri kelishi mumkin.[80][81] Imkoniyatlar tengligi harfini kuzatayotganda ikkala shaxsga teng munosabatda bo'lish, boshqa nuqtai nazardan adolatsiz ko'rinadi.

Bir o'lchov bo'yicha teng imkoniyatga erishish uchun qilingan harakatlar boshqa o'lchovlarda adolatsizlikni kuchaytirishi mumkin. Masalan, hammom hammomlarini qabul qiling: agar adolat uchun erkaklar va ayollar hammomlarining jismoniy maydoni teng bo'lsa, umumiy natija adolatsiz bo'lishi mumkin, chunki erkaklar kam bo'shliqni talab qiladigan siydik chiqarish vositalaridan foydalanishlari mumkin.[82] Boshqacha qilib aytganda, ayollarning hojatxonalari uchun ko'proq jismoniy joy ajratish yanada adolatli tartib bo'lishi mumkin. Sotsiolog Xarvi Xolot quyidagicha tushuntirdi: "Bir xil o'lchamdagi erkaklar va ayollar xonalarini yaratish orqali jamiyat individual ayollarning ahvoli erkaklarnikidan yomonroq bo'lishiga kafolat beradi".[82]

Yana bir qiyinchilik shundan iboratki, jamiyat uchun har qanday lavozim yoki soha turiga imkoniyatlarning tengligini ta'minlash qiyin. Agar millat o'z kuchlarini ba'zi bir sanoat yoki lavozimlarga yo'naltirsa, unda boshqa iste'dod egalari chetda qolishi mumkin. Masalan, misolida Stenford falsafa entsiklopediyasi, jangchi jamiyat barcha turdagi odamlarga adolatli raqobat orqali harbiy yutuqlarga erishish uchun teng imkoniyat yaratishi mumkin, ammo fermerlik kabi noharbiy mahoratga ega odamlar chetda qolishi mumkin.[2]

Imkoniyatlar tengligini amalga oshirishda qonun chiqaruvchilar muammolarga duch kelishdi. 2010 yilda Britaniya, "davlat organlarini sinflarning ahvoliga tushib qolgan tengsizlikni kamaytirishga harakat qilishga majbur qilish" to'g'risidagi qonuniy talab ko'p munozaralardan so'ng bekor qilindi va uning o'rniga tashkilotlar "tenglik" dan ko'ra ko'proq "adolat" ga e'tibor qaratishga harakat qilishadi degan umid bilan almashtirildi, chunki adolat odatda tenglikdan ko'ra ancha noaniq tushuncha,[83] ammo siyosatchilar, agar ular munozarali bahslardan qochmoqchi bo'lsa, ularni boshqarish osonroq. Yilda Nyu-York shahri, shahar hokimi Ed Koch ozchilikni chetga surib qo'yish deb nomlangan ancha mazmunli va to'satdan o'tkazmalarga qarshi bahs yuritganda "teng muomala printsipi" ni saqlash yo'llarini izlashga urindi.[84]

Teng imkoniyatlar masalalari armiyadagi davra suhbatida muhokama qilinadi Alabama

Ko'pgina mamlakatlarda imkoniyatlar tengligini ko'rib chiqish vazifasi yuklatilgan aniq organlar mavjud. Masalan, Qo'shma Shtatlarda bu Teng ish bilan ta'minlash bo'yicha teng komissiya;[17][85] yilda Britaniya, Imkoniyatlar tengligi qo'mitasi mavjud[25] shuningdek, tenglik va inson huquqlari bo'yicha komissiya;[41] yilda Kanada, Ayollar holati bo'yicha qirollik komissiyasi "uning amri sifatida teng imkoniyat" mavjud;[86] va Xitoy, Teng imkoniyatlar komissiyasi etnik xurofotga oid masalalarni hal qiladi.[87] Bundan tashqari, teng huquqli munosabatlarni talab qiluvchi siyosiy harakatlar bo'lib o'tdi, masalan, yigirmanchi asrning dastlabki o'n yilliklarida Qo'shma Shtatlardagi ish beruvchilar tomonidan adolatli munosabatda bo'lishga undagan Ayollar uchun teng imkoniyatlar ligasi.[88] Guruh a'zolaridan biri tushuntirdi:

Men xushyoqishni so'ramayman, lekin men o'zim tanlashim mumkin bo'lgan eng qulay sharoitlarda eng yaxshi usulda o'z pullarimni topish uchun erkaklar bilan teng huquqni talab qilaman.[88]

Birlashgan Millatlar Tashkiloti kabi global tashabbuslar Barqaror rivojlanish maqsadi 5 va Maqsad 10 qarorlar qabul qilishning barcha darajalarida ayollar uchun teng imkoniyatlarni ta'minlash va natijalardagi tengsizlikni kamaytirishga qaratilgan.[89][90]

O'lchov bilan bog'liq qiyinchiliklar

Imkoniyatlarning tengligini o'lchashga urinish qiyin degan fikrga kelishilgan[73] yollash to'g'risidagi bitta qarorni tekshiradimi yoki vaqt o'tishi bilan guruhlarni ko'rib chiqadimi.

  • Bitta misol. Muayyan ishga qabul qilish to'g'risidagi qarorni tartibga soluvchi protseduralarni qayta ko'rib chiqish, ularga rioya qilinganligini tekshirish va "adolatli bo'lganmi? Adolatli protseduralarga rioya qilinganmi? Eng yaxshi abituriyent tanlanganmi?" Kabi savollar bilan tanlovni qayta baholash mumkin. Bu sud qaroridir va qaror qabul qiluvchilarning ongiga noaniqliklar kirishi mumkin. Bunday misolda imkoniyatlar tengligini aniqlash matematikaga asoslangan ehtimollik: agar imkoniyatlarning tengligi amal qilsa, unda har ikki abituriyentning har biri ish joyini yutib olish imkoniyatining 50 foiziga ega bo'lsa, ya'ni ularning ikkalasida ham muvaffaqiyatga erishish uchun teng imkoniyatlar mavjud bo'lsa (bu, albatta, ehtimollikni baholash barcha o'zgaruvchilardan xabardor emas, shu jumladan iste'dod yoki mahorat kabi haqiqiy, irqiy yoki jins kabi o'zboshimchalik bilan). Ammo, natijada har bir murojaat etuvchining aslida 50 foiz imkoniyatga ega bo'lganligini o'lchash qiyin.
  • Guruhlar. Ish turi yoki kompaniya yoki sanoat yoki millat uchun teng imkoniyatlarni baholashda, keyin statistik tahlil ko'pincha naqsh va anormalliklarga qarab,[2] odatda kichik guruhlarni foizlar bo'yicha katta guruhlar bilan taqqoslash. Agar imkoniyatlar tengligi buzilgan bo'lsa, ehtimol kamsitish vaqt o'tishi bilan kichik guruhga yoki populyatsiyaga ta'sir ko'rsatadigan bo'lsa, buni statistik tahlil yordamida aniqlash mumkin, ammo ko'plab qiyinchiliklar mavjud.[2] Shunga qaramay, shahar hukumati kabi sub'ektlar[91] va universitetlar[92] teng imkoniyatlar to'g'risidagi qoidalarga rioya qilishni ta'minlash uchun statistik ma'lumotlarga ega bo'lgan doimiy ishchi mutaxassislarni yolladilar. Masalan, Kolorado shtati universiteti ularning teng imkoniyatlar bo'yicha boshqarmasi direktoridan ishchilar toifasiga ko'ra, shuningdek xodimlariga oid keng statistik ma'lumotlarni yuritishni talab qiladi ozchiliklar va jins.[93] Britaniyada, Aberistvit universiteti teng imkoniyatlar to'g'risidagi qonunlarga rioya qilish uchun "ayollar, erkaklar, irqiy yoki etnik ozchiliklar vakillari va nogironligi bo'lgan shaxslarni vakolatxonaga da'vogarlar, suhbatga qo'yilgan nomzodlar, yangi tayinlovlar, amaldagi xodimlar, lavozim ko'taruvchilari va o'z xohishiga ko'ra mukofot egalari orasida namoyish etish" kabi ma'lumotlarni to'playdi.[94]

It is difficult to prove unequal treatment although statistical analysis can provide indications of problems, but it is subject to conflicts over interpretation and methodological issues. For example, a study in 2007 by the Vashington universiteti examined its own treatment of ayollar. Researchers collected statistics about female participation in numerous aspects of university life, including percentages of ayollar with full professorships (23 per cent), enrollment in programs such as nursing (90 per cent) and engineering (18 per cent).[95] There is wide variation in how these statistics might be interpreted. For example, the 23 per cent figure for women with full professorships could be compared to the total population of women (presumably 50 per cent) perhaps using census data,[96] or it might be compared to the percentage of women with full professorships at competing universities. It might be used in an analysis of how many women applied for the position of full professor compared to how many women attained this position. Further, the 23 per cent figure could be used as a benchmark or baseline figure as part of an ongoing longitudinal analysis to be compared with future surveys to track progress over time.[94][97] In addition, the strength of the conclusions is subject to statistical issues such as sample size va tarafkashlik. For reasons such as these, there is considerable difficulty with most forms of statistical interpretation.

A computerized statistical analysis suggested qarindoshlik and a practice of unequal opportunity within Italy's academic community (photo: Bari universiteti )[98]

Statistical analysis of equal opportunity has been done using sophisticated examinations of computer databases. An analysis in 2011 by Chikago universiteti researcher Stefano Allesina examined 61,000 names of Italyancha professors by looking at the "frequency of last names", doing one million random drawings and he suggested that Italian academia was characterized by violations of equal opportunity practices as a result of these investigations.[98] The last names of Italian professors tended to be similar more often than predicted by random chance.[98] The study suggested that newspaper accounts showing that "nine relatives from three generations of a single family (were) on the economics faculty" at the Bari universiteti were not aberrations, but indicated a pattern of qarindoshlik throughout Italian academia.[98]

There is support for the view that often equality of opportunity is measured by the criteria of natija tengligi,[99] although with difficulty. In one example, an analysis of relative equality of opportunity was done based on outcomes, such as a case to see whether hiring decisions were fair regarding men versus women—the analysis was done using statistics based on average salaries for different groups.[100][101] In another instance, a cross-sectional statistical analysis was conducted to see whether ijtimoiy sinf affected participation in the Amerika Qo'shma Shtatlari qurolli kuchlari davomida Vetnam urushi: a report in Vaqt tomonidan Massachusets texnologiya instituti suggested that soldiers came from a variety of social classes and that the principle of equal opportunity had worked,[102] possibly because soldiers had been chosen by a lotereya uchun jarayon muddatli harbiy xizmatga chaqirish. In college admissions, equality of outcome can be measured directly by comparing offers of admission given to different groups of applicants: for example, there have been reports in newspapers of kamsitish qarshi Osiyolik amerikaliklar bilan bog'liq college admissions in the United States which suggest that Asian American applicants need higher grades and test scores to win admission to prestigious universities than other ethnic groups.[103][104]

Marketplace considerations

Equal opportunity has been described as a fundamental basic notion in business and commerce and described by iqtisodchi Adam Smit as a basic economic precept.[1] There has been research suggesting that "competitive markets will tend to drive out such discrimination" since employers or institutions which hire based on arbitrary criteria will be weaker as a result and not perform as well as firms which embrace equality of opportunity.[2] Firms competing for overseas contracts have sometimes argued in the press for equal chances during the bidding process, such as when American oil corporations wanted equal shots at developing oil fields in Sumatra;[105] and firms, seeing how fairness is beneficial while competing for contracts, can apply the lesson to other areas such as internal hiring and promotion decisions. Hisobot USA Today suggested that the goal of equal opportunity was "being achieved throughout most of the business and government labor markets because major employers pay based on potential and actual productivity".[100]

Fair opportunity practices include measures taken by an organization to ensure fairness in the employment process. A basic definition of equality is the idea of equal treatment and respect. In job advertisements and descriptions, the fact that the employer is an equal opportunity employer is sometimes indicated by the abbreviations EOE or MFDV, which stands for Minority, Female, Disabled, Veteran. Analyst Ross Douthat in The New York Times suggested that equality of opportunity depends on a rising iqtisodiyot which brings new chances for yuqoriga qarab harakatlanish and he suggested that greater equality of opportunity is more easily achieved during "times of plenty".[106] Efforts to achieve equal opportunity can rise and recede, sometimes as a result of economic conditions or political choices.[107] Empirical evidence from public health research also suggests that equality of opportunity is linked to better health outcomes in the United States and Europe.[108][109]

Tarix

Professorning so'zlariga ko'ra Devid xristian of Macquarie University, an underlying Katta tarix trend has been a shift from seeing people as resources to exploit towards a perspective of seeing people as individuals to empower. According to Christian, in many ancient agrarian civilizations, roughly nine of every ten persons was a peasant exploited by a ruling class. In the past thousand years, there has been a gradual movement in the direction of greater respect for equal opportunity as political structures based on generational hierarchies and feodalizm broke down during the late O'rta yosh and new structures emerged during the Uyg'onish davri. Monarxiyalar bilan almashtirildi demokratik davlatlar: kings were replaced by parliaments and congresses. Qullik was also abolished generally. The new entity of the milliy davlat emerged with highly specialized parts, including korporatsiyalar, laws and new ideas about fuqarolik as well as values about individual huquqlar found expression in constitutions, laws and statutes.

Afroamerikalik inson huquqlari yurist Thurgood Marshall fought numerous battles in the courts for equal opportunity for all races in the United States; argued the 1954 Brown va Ta'lim kengashi case and won; and in 1967 was appointed to the Oliy sud

In the United States, one legal analyst suggested that the real beginning of the modern sense of equal opportunity was in the O'n to'rtinchi o'zgartirish which provided "equal protection under the law".[22] The amendment did not mention equal opportunity directly, but it helped undergird a series of later rulings which dealt with legal struggles, particularly by Afroamerikaliklar and later women, seeking greater political and economic power in the growing republic. In 1933, a congressional "Unemployment Relief Act" forbade kamsitish "on the basis of race, color, or creed".[22] The Oliy sud 1954 yil Brown va Ta'lim kengashi decision furthered government initiatives to end discrimination.[22]

1961 yilda Prezident Jon F. Kennedi imzolangan Ijro buyrug'i 10925 which enabled a presidential committee on equal opportunity,[22] which was soon followed by President Lyndon B. Jonson "s Ijroiya buyrug'i 11246.[110] The Fuqarolik huquqlari to'g'risidagi 1964 y became the legal underpinning of equal opportunity in employment.[22] Businesses and other organizations learned to comply with the rulings by specifying fair hiring and promoting practices and posting these policy notices on bulletin boards, employee handbooks and manuals as well as training sessions and films.[22] Courts dealt with issues about equal opportunity, such as the 1989 Wards Cove decision, the Supreme Court ruled that statistical evidence by itself was insufficient to prove racial discrimination. The Teng ish bilan ta'minlash bo'yicha teng komissiya was established, sometimes reviewing charges of discrimination cases which numbered in the tens of thousands annually during the 1990s.[22] Some law practices specialized in mehnat qonuni. Conflict between formal and substantive approaches manifested itself in backlashes, sometimes described as teskari kamsitish kabi Bakke case when a white male applicant to medical school sued on the basis of being denied admission because of a quota system preferring minority applicants.[4][111] 1990 yilda Nogironligi bo'lgan amerikaliklar to'g'risidagi qonun prohibited discrimination against disabled persons, including cases of equal opportunity. 2008 yilda, Genetik ma'lumotni kamsitmaslik to'g'risidagi qonun prevents employers from using genetic information when yollash, otish, yoki targ'ib qilish xodimlar.[112]

Tadbirlar

Many economists measure the degree of equal opportunity with measures of iqtisodiy harakatchanlik. Masalan; misol uchun, Jozef Stiglitz asserts that with five economic divisions and full equality of opportunity, "20 percent of those in the bottom fifth would see their children in the bottom fifth. Denmark almost achieves that – 25 percent are stuck there. Britain, supposedly notorious for its class divisions, does only a little worse (30 percent). That means they have a 70 percent chance of moving up. The chances of moving up in America, though, are markedly smaller (only 58 percent of children born to the bottom group make it out), and when they do move up, they tend to move up only a little". Similar analyses can be performed for each economic division and overall. They all show how far from the ideal all industrialized nations are and how correlated measures of equal opportunity are with daromadlarning tengsizligi va boylik tengsizligi.[113] Equal opportunity has ramifications beyond income; the American Human Development Index, rooted in the capabilities approach pioneered by Amartya Sen, is used to measure opportunity across geographies in the U.S. using health, education and standard of living outcomes.[114]

Tanqid

There is agreement that the concept of equal opportunity lacks a precise definition.[2][115] While it generally describes "open and fair competition" with equal chances for achieving sought-after jobs or positions[4] as well as an absence of kamsitish,[4][14][116] the concept is elusive with a "wide range of meanings".[44] It is hard to measure, and implementation poses problems[2] as well as disagreements about what to do.[20]

There have been various criticisms directed at both the substantive and formal approach. One account suggests that left-leaning thinkers who advocate equality of outcome fault even formal equality of opportunity on the grounds that it "legitimates inequalities of wealth and income".[20] Jon V. Gardner suggested several views: (1) that inequalities will always exist regardless of trying to erase them; (2) that bringing everyone "fairly to the starting line" without dealing with the "destructive competitiveness that follows"; (3) any equalities achieved will entail future inequalities.[117] Substantive equality of opportunity has led to concerns that efforts to improve fairness "ultimately collapses into the different one of equality of outcome or condition".[20]

Iqtisodchi Larri Summers advocated an approach of focusing on equality of opportunity and not equality of outcomes and that the way to strengthen equal opportunity was to bolster xalq ta'limi.[118] A contrasting report in Iqtisodchi criticized efforts to contrast equality of opportunity and equality of outcome as being opposite poles on a hypothetical ethical scale, such that equality of opportunity should be the "highest ideal" while equality of outcome was "evil".[119] Rather, the report argued that any difference between the two types of equality was illusory and that both terms were highly interconnected.[119] According to this argument, wealthier people have greater opportunities – wealth itself can be considered as "distilled opportunity" – and children of wealthier parents have access to better schools, health care, nutrition and so forth.[119] Accordingly, people who endorse equality of opportunity may like the idea of it in principle, yet at the same time they would be unwilling to take the extreme steps or "titanic interventions" necessary to achieve real intergenerational equality.[119] A slightly different view in Guardian suggested that equality of opportunity was merely a "buzzword" to sidestep the thornier political question of income inequality.[120]

There is speculation that since equality of opportunity is only one of sometimes competing "justice norms", there is a risk that following equality of opportunity too strictly might cause problems in other areas.[2][121] A hypothetical example was suggested: suppose wealthier people gave excessive amounts of campaign contributions; suppose further that these contributions resulted in better regulations; and then laws limiting such contributions on the basis of equal opportunity for all political participants may have the unintended long term consequence of making political decision-making lackluster and possibly hurting the groups that it was trying to protect.[2] Faylasuf John Kekes makes a similar point in his book Siyosat san'ati in which he suggests that there is a danger to elevating any one particular political good – including equality of opportunity – without balancing competing goods such as justice, property rights and others.[122] Kekes advocated having a balanced perspective, including a continuing dialog between cautionary elements and reform elements.[122] Xuddi shunday fikr ham Ronald Dvorkin yilda Iqtisodchi:

It strikes us as wrong – or not obviously right – that some people starve while others have private jets. We are uncomfortable when university professors earn less, for example, than junior lawyers. But equality appears to pull against other important ideals such as liberty and efficiency.[68]

Iqtisodchi Pol Krugman sees equality of opportunity as a "non-Utopian compromise" which works and is a "pretty decent arrangement" which varies from country to country.[64] However, there are differing views such as by Matt Cavanagh, who criticised equality of opportunity in his 2002 book Against Equality of Opportunity.[44] Cavanagh favored a limited approach of opposing specific kinds of discrimination as steps to help people get greater control over their lives.[123]

Konservativ mutafakkir Dinesh D'Souza criticized equality of opportunity on the basis that "it is an ideal that cannot and should not be realized through the actions of the government" and added that "for the state to enforce equal opportunity would be to contravene the true meaning of the Deklaratsiya and to subvert the principle of a free society".[124] D'Souza described how his parenting undermined equality of opportunity:

I have a five-year-old daughter. Since she was born ... my wife and I have gone to great lengths in the Great Yuppie Parenting Race. ... My wife goes over her workbooks. I am teaching her chess. Why are we doing these things? We are, of course, trying to develop her abilities so that she can get the most out of life. The practical effect of our actions, however, is that we are working to give our daughter an edge – that is, a better chance to succeed than everybody else's children. Even though we might be embarrassed to think of it this way, we are doing our utmost to undermine equal opportunity. So are all the other parents who are trying to get their children into the best schools ...[124]

Equal opportunity theorists generally agree that once the race begins, who wins is a function of talent, hard work and competitive drive (photo: runner Billi Mills crossing the finish line in the 1964 yilgi Olimpiada )

D'Souza argued that it was wrong for government to try to bring his daughter down, or to force him to raise up other people's children,[124] but a counterargument is that there is a benefit to everybody, including D'Souza's daughter, to have a society with less anxiety about downward mobility, less class resentment and less possible violence.[124]

An argument similar to D'Souza's was raised in Anarxiya, shtat va Utopiya tomonidan Robert Nozik, who wrote that the only way to achieve equality of opportunity was "directly worsening the situations of those more favored with opportunity, or by improving the situation of those less well-favored".[125] Nozick gave an argument of two suitors competing to marry one "fair lady": X was plain while Y was better looking and more intelligent. If Y did not exist, then "fair lady" would have married X, but Y exists and so she marries Y. Nozick asks: "Does suitor X have a legitimate complaint against Y on the basis of unfairness since Y did not earn his good looks or intelligence?".[126] Nozick suggests that there is no grounds for complaint. Nozick argued against equality of opportunity on the grounds that it violates the huquqlar of property since the equal opportunity maxim interferes with an owner's right to do what he or she pleases with a property.[2]

Property rights were a major component of the philosophy of Jon Lokk and are sometimes referred to as "Lockean rights".[2] The sense of the argument is along these lines: equal opportunity rules regarding, say, a hiring decision within a factory, made to bring about greater fairness, violate a factory owner's rights to run the factory as he or she sees best; it has been argued that a factory owner's right to property encompasses all decision-making within the factory as being part of those property rights. That some people's "natural assets" were unearned is irrelevant to the equation according to Nozick and he argued that people are nevertheless entitled to enjoy these assets and other things freely given by others.[24]

Fridrix Xayek felt that luck was too much of a variable in economics, such that one can not devise a system with any kind of fairness when many market outcomes are unintended.[24] By sheer chance or random circumstances, a person may become wealthy just by being in the right place and time and Hayek argued that it is impossible to devise a system to make opportunities equal without knowing how such interactions may play out.[24] Hayek saw not only equality of opportunity, but all of ijtimoiy adolat as a "mirage".[24]

Some conceptions of equality of opportunity, particularly the substantive and level playing field variants, have been criticized on the basis that they make assumptions to the effect that people have similar genetic makeups.[2] Other critics have suggested that social justice is more complex than mere equality of opportunity.[2] Nozick made the point that what happens in society can not always be reduced to competitions for a coveted position and in 1974 wrote that "life is not a race in which we all compete for a prize which someone has established", that there is "no unified race" and there is not some one person "judging swiftness".[126]

Shuningdek qarang

Adabiyotlar

  1. ^ a b v Paul de Vries (September 12, 2011), "teng imkoniyat", Blackwell ma'lumotnomasi, olingan 12 sentyabr, 2011
  2. ^ a b v d e f g h men j k l m n o p q r s t siz v w x y z aa ab ak reklama ae af ag ah ai Richard Arneson (August 29, 2008). "Equality of Opportunity". Stenford falsafa entsiklopediyasi. Olingan 8 sentyabr, 2011. (Fall 2008 Edition)
  3. ^ a b Yo Jackson (editor) (2006), Encyclopedia of multicultural psychology, Sage nashrlari, ISBN  1-4129-0948-1, olingan 12 sentyabr, 2011CS1 maint: qo'shimcha matn: mualliflar ro'yxati (havola)
  4. ^ a b v d e f g h men j k l m n o p q r s t siz v Nicole Richardt; Torrey Shanks (2008), Teng imkoniyat, International Encyclopedia of the Social Sciences, olingan 12 sentyabr, 2011, Encyclopedia.com orqali
  5. ^ Teng imkoniyat, Princeton University, 2008, olingan 12 sentyabr, 2011
  6. ^ teng imkoniyat, Collins English Dictionary, 2003, olingan 12 sentyabr, 2011
  7. ^ John W. Gardner (1984), Excellence: Can we be equal and excellent too?, Norton, ISBN  0-393-31287-9, olingan 8 sentyabr, 2011, (see page 47)
  8. ^ "Jinsiy tenglik". www.un.org. 2015 yil 16-dekabr. Olingan 4 oktyabr, 2020.
  9. ^ a b v d "teng imkoniyat". jrank.org. 2011 yil 12 sentyabr. Olingan 12 sentyabr, 2011.
  10. ^ Valentino Dardanoni, University of Palermo, Gary S. Fields, Cornell University, John E. Roemer, Yale University, Maria Laura Sánchez Puerta, The World Bank (2006), "How Demanding Should Equality of Opportunity Be, and How Much Have We Achieved?", Cornell University – Digital Commons ILR, olingan 24 iyul, 2012, (from the abstract) [...] Agreement is widespread that equality of opportunity holds in a society if the chances that individuals have to succeed depend only on their own efforts and not on extraneous circumstances.CS1 maint: bir nechta ism: mualliflar ro'yxati (havola)
  11. ^ Marjorie Conley (September 9, 2003). "Sciences Po – an elite institution's introspection on its power, position and worth in French society". portfel. Olingan 12 sentyabr, 2011. [...] created new entrance criteria for students coming from less economically favored social strata.
  12. ^ Krossmen, Eshli. "Understanding Meritocracy From a Sociological Perspective". ThoughtCo. Olingan 4 oktyabr, 2020.
  13. ^ Ricardo Paes de Barros. Francisco H. G. Ferreira, Jose R. Molinas Vega, and Jaime Saavedra Chanduvi (2009), Measuring inequality of opportunity in Latin America and the Caribbean, Palgrave Macmillan and the World Bank, ISBN  978-0-8213-7745-1, olingan 8 sentyabr, 2011, xvii sahifaCS1 maint: bir nechta ism: mualliflar ro'yxati (havola)
  14. ^ a b Carol Kitman (September 12, 2011), teng imkoniyat, Merriam-Vebster lug'ati, olingan 12 sentyabr, 2011
  15. ^ Swire, Peter P.. "Equality of opportunity and investment in creditworthiness. (Symposium – Shaping American Communities: Segregation, Housing & the Urban Poor)." Pensilvaniya universiteti yuridik sharhi. University of Pennsylvania, Law School. 1995 yil. Highbeam Research article 2012 yil 12 sentyabr.
  16. ^ Yosh, Maykl (1963) [1958]. Meritokratiyaning ko'tarilishi. Buyuk Britaniya: Pingvin kitoblari. p. 129. ISBN  1-56000-704-4. Olingan 12 yanvar, 2011.
  17. ^ a b v Steven Greenhouse (December 21, 2010). "E.E.O.C. Sues Kaplan Over Hiring". The New York Times. Olingan 8 sentyabr, 2011. ... the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission sued the Kaplan Higher Education Corporation ...
  18. ^ Jerald N. Xill; Kathleen T. Hill (September 8, 2011), teng imkoniyat, The Free Dictionary, olingan 8 sentyabr, 2011
  19. ^ teng imkoniyat, Merriam-Webster, olingan 8 sentyabr, 2011
  20. ^ a b v d e f g h men j k l Mark Bevir (editor) (2010), Siyosiy nazariya entsiklopediyasi, SAGE nashrlari, ISBN  9781412958653, olingan 12 sentyabr, 2011, (see pages 452–453)...CS1 maint: qo'shimcha matn: mualliflar ro'yxati (havola)
  21. ^ from The Montreal Gazette (January 20, 1906). "Teng imkoniyat". The New York Times. Olingan 8 sentyabr, 2011. The coming President of France is the grandson of a shoemaker. ...
  22. ^ a b v d e f g h men Boyd Childress (September 12, 2011), Teng imkoniyat, Encyclopedia of Business, olingan 12 sentyabr, 2011
  23. ^ John Michael Jenkins, J. J. J. Pigram (editors) (2005), Encyclopedia of leisure and outdoor recreation, Routledge, ISBN  0-203-67317-4, olingan 12 sentyabr, 2011, (see page 141)CS1 maint: bir nechta ism: mualliflar ro'yxati (havola) CS1 maint: qo'shimcha matn: mualliflar ro'yxati (havola)
  24. ^ a b v d e f g h men Gordon Marshall (1998), Ijtimoiy adolat, Encyclopedia.com, olingan 12 sentyabr, 2011, ... John Rawls's famous ‘difference principle’ ... (see his A Theory of Justice, 1972)
  25. ^ a b staff writers (September 21, 2010). "Equality of opportunity committee". BBC. Olingan 8 sentyabr, 2011.
  26. ^ staff writers (November 30, 2009). "The Royal College of Nursing has called for an increase in the number of specialist nurses working with HIV patients". BBC yangiliklari. Olingan 8 sentyabr, 2011.
  27. ^ Takao Ikeuchi; Kaori Saito (April 17, 2010). "Space mom wants equal opportunity for all". Japan Times. Olingan 8 sentyabr, 2011.
  28. ^ Robert Garcia (August 18, 1989). "Bilingual Education Means Equal Opportunity (letter to the editor)". The New York Times. Olingan 8 sentyabr, 2011.
  29. ^ a b "Braziliya moda haftaligi teng imkoniyatlarga ega". Daily Telegraph. 2009 yil 20-iyun. Olingan 8 sentyabr, 2011.
  30. ^ Howard Klieman (September 12, 2011). "Equal Time Rule: U.S. Broadcasting Regulatory Rule". Broadcast Communications muzeyi. Olingan 12 sentyabr, 2011.
  31. ^ "Army Promotion Process Is Held Unconstitutional by U.S. Judge". The New York Times. 2002 yil 5 mart. Olingan 8 sentyabr, 2011.
  32. ^ "Illiterate Americans (opinion)". The New York Times. 1993 yil 14 sentyabr. Olingan 8 sentyabr, 2011.
  33. ^ Celia W. Dugger (February 29, 1992). "U.S. Study Says Asian-Americans Face Widespread Discrimination". The New York Times. Olingan 8 sentyabr, 2011.
  34. ^ a b v d e f g h men j k Laura, Laubeová (2000), Encyclopedia of The World's Minorities, Fitzroy Dearborn Publishers, archived from asl nusxasi 2012 yil 13 yanvarda, olingan 12 sentyabr, 2011, This complex and contested concept...
  35. ^ Barbara Bagihole, Equal Opportunities and Social Policy: Issues of gender, race and disability, (pp. 37–39, 183–84)London: Longman, 1997
  36. ^ Mark Bevir (editor) (2010), Siyosiy nazariya entsiklopediyasi, SAGE nashrlari, ISBN  9781412958653, olingan 12 sentyabr, 2011CS1 maint: qo'shimcha matn: mualliflar ro'yxati (havola)
  37. ^ a b https://milescorak.files.wordpress.com/2013/07/income-inequality-equality-of-opportunity-and-intergenerational-mobility.pdf
  38. ^ Arneson, Richard (2015), "Equality of Opportunity", Zaltada, Edvard N. (tahr.), Stenford falsafa entsiklopediyasi (Summer 2015 ed.), Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University, olingan 4 oktyabr, 2020
  39. ^ a b v d e John E. Roemer (1998), Equality of Opportunity (book title), Harvard College, ISBN  0-674-25991-2, olingan 8 sentyabr, 2011, (see pages 1, 2,
  40. ^ Cashmore, Ellis, Dictionary of Race and Ethnic Relations, London: Routledge, 1996
  41. ^ a b Research Machines (2009). "equal-opportunity policy". Farlex. Olingan 12 sentyabr, 2011.
  42. ^ Leonard K. Hirshberg (December 30, 1917). "What "Equal Opportunity to All" Really Means". The New York Times. Olingan 8 sentyabr, 2011.
  43. ^ a b v Milton Fridman; Rose D. Friedman (1980), Free to choose: a personal statement, Harcourt, ISBN  0547539754, olingan 8 sentyabr, 2011
  44. ^ a b v Matt Cavanagh (2002). "Against equality of opportunity". Oksford. ISBN  9780191584046. Olingan 8 sentyabr, 2011.
  45. ^ Akemi Nakamura (March 31, 1999). "New equal opportunity law called a start". Japan Times. Arxivlandi asl nusxasi 2012 yil 15 oktyabrda. Olingan 8 sentyabr, 2011.
  46. ^ Martin Fackler (August 6, 2007). "Career Women In Japan Find A Blocked Path, Despite Equal Opportunity Law". The New York Times. Olingan 8 sentyabr, 2011.
  47. ^ Christiano, Thomas, 1996, The Rule of the Many: Fundamental Issues in Democratic Theory, Boulder: Westview Press
  48. ^ Inequality of Opportunity, Income Inequality and Economic Mobility: Some International Comparisons, Paolo Brunori, University of Bari, Francisco H. G. Ferreira, World Bank and IZA, Vito Peragine, University of Bari, Discussion Paper No. 7155, January 2013.
  49. ^ Daron Acemoglu (January 23, 2011). "How does inequality matter? (letter to the editor)". Iqtisodchi. Olingan 8 sentyabr, 2011. ...equality of opportunity may be harder to achieve in an unequal society...
  50. ^ "Socialism And Social Democracy". Encyclopedia69.com. 2011 yil. Olingan 12 sentyabr, 2011.
  51. ^ Deborah Orr (November 5, 2009). "The problem with equal opportunity for all: Some people are better placed to take advantage of equal opportunity in our schools". Guardian. Olingan 8 sentyabr, 2011. Therein lies the problem with the idea of equal opportunity for all. Some people are simply better placed to take advantage of opportunity...
  52. ^ Stiglitz, Joseph E. (June 4, 2012). The Price of Inequality: How Today's Divided Society Endangers Our Future (p. 25). Norton. Kindle Edition.
  53. ^ a b John Hills (January 27, 2010). "Equality of opportunity remains a distant ideal". Guardian. Olingan 8 sentyabr, 2011.
  54. ^ Ha-Joon Chang (August 30, 2010). "We lost sight of fairness in the false promise of wealth: Acceptance of inequality rests on assumptions that 'free markets' make us all richer in the end. Growth figures tell it differently". Guardian. Olingan 8 sentyabr, 2011.
  55. ^ Paul Krugman (January 10, 2011). "Economics and Morality". The New York Times. Olingan 8 sentyabr, 2011. ...Access to good schools, good health care, and job opportunities depends on lot on choosing the right parents.
  56. ^ "For Equality of Opportunity". Times of India. 2011 yil 8 sentyabr. Olingan 24 iyul, 2012.
  57. ^ Parekh, Bhikhu, Rethinking Multiculturalism. Cultural Diversity and Political Theory, pp. 210–11, 240, London: Macmillan Press, 2000
  58. ^ "Braziliya moda haftaligi teng imkoniyatlarga ega". Daily Telegraph. 2009 yil 20-iyun. Olingan 8 sentyabr, 2011. ... the Sao Paulo Fashion Week ... has imposed quotas...
  59. ^ Carol Kleiman (January 19, 1986). "Equal Opportunity: It's Good Business". Chicago Tribune. Olingan 8 sentyabr, 2011.
  60. ^ Kanta Murali (February 1–14, 2003). "IIT hikoyasi: muammolar va tashvishlar". Frontline. Arxivlandi asl nusxasi 2006 yil 26 martda. Olingan 12 sentyabr, 2011. Frontline – Volume 20 – Issue 03
  61. ^ John Rawls (1971). "A Theory of Justice". Garvard kolleji. ISBN  9780674042605. Olingan 8 sentyabr, 2011.
  62. ^ Rawls, John, 1999, A Theory of Justice, revised edition, Cambridge: Harvard University Press
  63. ^ Rawls, John, 2001, Justice as Fairness: A Restatement, ed. by Erin Kelly, Cambridge, Harvard University Press.
  64. ^ a b v Pol Krugman (2011 yil 11-yanvar). "Imkoniyatlar tengligi to'g'risida ko'proq fikrlar". The New York Times. Olingan 8 sentyabr, 2011.
  65. ^ Roemer, John, 1995, "Equality and Responsibility", Boston Review, April–May issue, pp. 3–7.
  66. ^ Roemer, John, 1998, Equality of Opportunity, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  67. ^ Dworkin, Ronald, 2000, Suveren fazilat, Cambridge: Harvard University Press, chapters 1–3.
  68. ^ a b v staff writer (September 21, 2000). "Forgotten value". Iqtisodchi. Olingan 8 sentyabr, 2011. (reviews of books by Dworkin and Cohen)
  69. ^ Richard Arneson (October 8, 2002). "4. The Level Playing Field Conception". Stenford universiteti. Olingan 8 sentyabr, 2011.
  70. ^ Anderson, Elizabeth, 1999, "What Is the Point of Equality?", Ethics 109, pp. 287–337.
  71. ^ Pogge, Thomas W., 2000, "Justice for People with Disabilities: the Semiconsequentialist Approach," in Leslie Pickering Francis and Anita Silvers. eds., Americans with Disabilities: Exploring Implications of the Law for Individuals and Institutions, New York and London: Routledge, pp. 34–53.
  72. ^ Buchanan, Allen, Brock, Dan W., Daniels, Norman, and Wikler, Daniel, 2000, From Chance to Choice – Genetics and Justice, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, chapters 3, 4 and 7.
  73. ^ a b Ricardo Paes de Barros. Francisco H. G. Ferreira, Jose R. Molinas Vega, and Jaime Saavedra Chanduvi (2009), Measuring inequality of opportunity in Latin America and the Caribbean, Palgrave Macmillan and the World Bank, ISBN  978-0-8213-7745-1, olingan 8 sentyabr, 2011, (page 32 Box 1.1)CS1 maint: bir nechta ism: mualliflar ro'yxati (havola)
  74. ^ "Exaggerated hopes for Mideast prosperity?". Al-Jazira. 2011 yil 24 mart. Olingan 8 sentyabr, 2011. Tunisia: Advances without equal opportunity ... Egypt: Stagnation without equal opportunity ...
  75. ^ Herrnstein, R. J. et al. Qo'ng'iroq egri chizig'i. 1979
  76. ^ Brock, Dan W., 2000, "Health Care Resource Prioritization and Discrimination against Persons with Disabilities," in Leslie Pickering Francis and Anita Silvers, eds., Americans with Disabilities: Exploring Implications of the Law for Individuals and Institutions, New York and London: Routledge, pp. 223–35.
  77. ^ "Are equal opportunity policies right for every profession?". BBC yangiliklari. 2002 yil 7-yanvar. Olingan 8 sentyabr, 2011.
  78. ^ Daniels, Norman, 1985, Just Health Care, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
  79. ^ McKerlie, Dennis, 1989, "Equality and Time," Ethics 99, pp. 475–91
  80. ^ McKerlie, Dennis, 1999, "Justice Between the Young and the Old," Philosophy and Public Affairs 30, pp. 152–17
  81. ^ Temkin, Larry S., 1993, Inequality, New York and Oxford: Oxford University Press, chapter 8
  82. ^ a b Xarvi Molotch, Sociological Forum, The Rest Room and Equal Opportunity, Jild 3, No. 1 (Winter, 1988), pp. 128–132, Retrieved September 1, 2016
  83. ^ Amelia Gentleman (November 17, 2010). "Theresa May Scraps Legal Requirement to Reduce Inequality". Guardian. Olingan 8 sentyabr, 2011.
  84. ^ Edward I. Koch (February 20, 1989). "Equal Opportunity – Without Minority Set-Asides". The New York Times: Opinion. Olingan 8 sentyabr, 2011.
  85. ^ Robin Finn (October 5, 2007). "An Equal Opportunity Enemy of Bias". The New York Times. Olingan 8 sentyabr, 2011. ... Equal Employment Opportunity Commission ... irqiy, jinsi va nogironligidan qat'iy nazar hamma uchun haqiqatga aylanadigan kamsitishlardan xoli bo'lgan ish joyi mening vazifamdir. "
  86. ^ Piter Bregg (1967 yil 3 fevral). "Birinchi navbatda tenglik: Qirollik ayollari holati bo'yicha komissiya". CBC Digital Archives. Olingan 8 sentyabr, 2011.
  87. ^ Timoti Chuy (2010 yil 18-iyun). "EOC: diskriminatsiya holatlari maxsus sudni talab qiladi". China Daily. Olingan 8 sentyabr, 2011. Teng imkoniyatlar komissiyasi (EOC) ... teng imkoniyatlar bo'yicha ishlarni ko'rib chiqish uchun soddalashtirilgan jarayonga ehtiyoj bor. ...
  88. ^ a b "Ayollarning qonunchilik bilan cheklangan ishi; ularning teng mehnat imkoniyatlarini cheklash to'g'risidagi teng huquqli kurash qonunchiligi". The New York Times. 1920 yil 18-yanvar. Olingan 8 sentyabr, 2011.
  89. ^ "Barqaror rivojlanish maqsadi 5: gender tengligi". BMT Ayollari. Olingan 23 sentyabr, 2020.
  90. ^ "10-maqsad". BMTTD. Olingan 23 sentyabr, 2020.
  91. ^ Ish ta'rifi: teng imkoniyatlar dasturlari yordamchisi, Feniks shahri, 2011 yil 16 sentyabr, arxivlangan asl nusxasi 2012 yil 2 aprelda, olingan 16 sentyabr, 2011, ... (ish ta'rifi :) Statistik tadqiqotlar va tahlillarni amalga oshiradi (talab qilinadigan bilimlar ...)
  92. ^ 1690 teng imkoniyatlar bo'yicha mutaxassis, Missuri shtati universiteti, 2011 yil, olingan 16 sentyabr, 2011, Ko'nikmalar: ... Kuchli miqdoriy va statistik tahlil qobiliyatlari talab qilinadi. ...
  93. ^ Ijobiy harakatlar dasturi - IV. Ishlatishni tahlil qilish / ishchi kuchini tahlil qilish, Kolorado shtati universiteti, 2010 yil, arxivlangan asl nusxasi 2012 yil 25 yanvarda, olingan 16 sentyabr, 2011, Izoh: Kolorado shtati universiteti ushbu toifalar uchun har bir lavozim turi bo'yicha alohida hisoblarni olib boradi ...
  94. ^ a b "Umumiy: Siyosatni amalga oshirish bo'yicha ko'rsatmalar". Aberistvit universiteti. 2004 yil 21 dekabr. Olingan 16 sentyabr, 2011. Aberystwyth universiteti o'z xodimlari va talabalar tarkibiga oid statistik ma'lumotlarni yig'adi ...[doimiy o'lik havola ]
  95. ^ Ben Shok (2007 yil 4-dekabr). "Tadqiqot ba'zi sohalarda kam vakili bo'lgan ayollarni topdi". Vashington Universitetining Daily. Arxivlandi asl nusxasi 2012 yil 28 martda. Olingan 16 sentyabr, 2011. Tadqiqot shuni ta'kidlaydiki, erkaklar bilan taqqoslaganda ayollar chinakam adolatli vakili ...
  96. ^ (UW) Prezidentning Ayollar bo'yicha maslahat qo'mitasi (2007). "Termin ta'riflari". Vashington universiteti. Arxivlandi asl nusxasi 2011 yil 15 oktyabrda. Olingan 16 sentyabr, 2011. Foyda berish tahlili - bu ma'lumotlar taqqoslanadigan yollash havzasi asosida hisoblanadi.
  97. ^ Marcia Killien (2007), PACW ning 2007 yildagi UWdagi ayollar to'g'risidagi hisoboti - qisqacha bayon, Vashington universiteti, dan arxivlangan asl nusxasi 2011 yil 15 oktyabrda, olingan 16 sentyabr, 2011
  98. ^ a b v d xodim yozuvchisi; Stefano Allesina (tadqiqotchi) (2011 yil 3-avgust), Italiya akademiyasi - bu oilaviy biznes, statistik tahlillar shuni ko'rsatadiki, Chikago universiteti tibbiyot markazi, olingan 16 sentyabr, 2011, ... Chikago universiteti tadqiqotchisi Stefano Allesina xolis, teng imkoniyatli ishga yollash bilan taqqoslanmagan deb topdi ....CS1 maint: bir nechta ism: mualliflar ro'yxati (havola)
  99. ^ Anne Fillips (2004). "Natija tengligini himoya qilish". Siyosiy falsafa jurnali. 1-19 betlar. Olingan 15 iyul, 2011.
  100. ^ a b Don Raiff (2011 yil 18-may). "Yig'ilish: o'rtacha ish haqini taqqoslash noto'g'ri". USA Today. Olingan 8 sentyabr, 2011.
  101. ^ Syuzi O'Brayen (2011 yil 8 mart). "Teng imkoniyat hali ham yo'l, chunki" erkaklar buni olishmaydi'". Daily Telegraph. Olingan 8 sentyabr, 2011. AYOLLAR bir xil ish uchun o'rtacha erkaklarnikiga qaraganda 16 foizga kam maosh olishadi.
  102. ^ "Teng imkoniyatlar urushi". Time jurnali. 1992 yil 9-noyabr. Olingan 8 sentyabr, 2011. Yangi tadqiqot ... shuni ko'rsatadiki, urushda vafot etgan 58000 amerikaliklar millatning yaxshi qatlamini anglatadi.
  103. ^ "Ba'zi osiyoliklar kollejining strategiyasi:" Osiyo tilini tekshirmang'". USA Today. Associated Press. 2011 yil 4-dekabr. Olingan 12 dekabr, 2011.
  104. ^ Kara Miller (2010 yil 8 fevral). "Kollejlar osiyolik amerikaliklarni qayta yo'naltirishadimi?". Boston Globe. Olingan 2 yanvar, 2011.
  105. ^ "Xyuz Gollandiyadagi neft konida teng imkoniyatni talab qilmoqda". The New York Times. 1921 yil 30 aprel. Olingan 8 sentyabr, 2011. ... Gollandiya hukumatiga kuchli nota topshirildi ...
  106. ^ Ross Douthat (2011 yil 10-aprel). "Imkoniyat uchun byudjetlashtirish". The New York Times. Olingan 8 sentyabr, 2011. Ko'p vaqtlarda ular yuqori harakatchanlik va imkoniyatlarning tengligi uchun mablag 'ajratishlari mumkin. ...
  107. ^ Klaudiya H. Deutsch (1987 yil 4-yanvar). "Balta teng imkoniyatga qulaydi". The New York Times. Olingan 8 sentyabr, 2011.
  108. ^ Venkataramani, Atheendar S.; Chatterji, Pola; Kavachi, Ichiro; Tsay, Aleksandr C. (2016 yil mart). "Qo'shma Shtatlardagi iqtisodiy imkoniyat, sog'liqqa oid xatti-harakatlar va o'lim". Amerika sog'liqni saqlash jurnali. 106 (3): 478–484. doi:10.2105 / AJPH.2015.302941. PMC  4758869. PMID  26691108.
  109. ^ Gugushvili, Aleksi; Kaiser, Caspar (2019 yil 5-noyabr). "Imkoniyatlarning tengligi Evropada o'lim darajasi pastligi bilan bog'liq". Epidemiologiya va jamiyat salomatligi jurnali. 74 (2): jech-2019-212540. doi:10.1136 / jech-2019-212540. PMC  6993020. PMID  31690589.
  110. ^ Ijroiya buyrug'i 11246, Qo'shma Shtatlar Mehnat vazirligi, 2011 yil 12 sentyabr, arxivlangan asl nusxasi 2011 yil 4 sentyabrda, olingan 12 sentyabr, 2011, 11246-sonli buyruq (E.O 11246) ... yopiq pudratchilarni ish bilan ta'minlashning barcha jabhalarida teng imkoniyatlar yaratilishini ta'minlash uchun ijobiy choralarni ko'rishni talab qiladi.
  111. ^ Dreyfuss, Joel (1979). Bakke ishi: tengsizlik siyosati. Nyu-York va London: Xarourt Brace Jovanovich.
  112. ^ Ma'muriyat siyosatining bayonoti, Prezidentning Ijro etuvchi apparati, Menejment va byudjet idorasi, 2007 yil 27 aprel
  113. ^ Stiglitz, Jozef E. (2012 yil 4-iyun). Tengsizlikning narxi: bo'linib ketgan jamiyat bizning kelajagimizga qanday xavf tug'diradi (18-19 betlar). Norton. Kindle Edition.
  114. ^ "Amerika o'lchovi - inson taraqqiyoti".
  115. ^ Rabe, Yoxan. 2001. Tenglik, ijobiy harakatlar va adolat. Talabga oid kitoblar. p. 83
  116. ^ teng imkoniyat, Ingliz tilining Amerika merosi lug'ati (Houghton Mifflin), 2009 y, olingan 12 sentyabr, 2011
  117. ^ Jon Uilyam Gardner (1984). "Zo'rlik: biz ham teng va zo'r bo'la olamizmi?". Norton. ISBN  0-393-31287-9. Olingan 8 sentyabr, 2011.
  118. ^ Lourens Summers (2012 yil 15-iyul). "Natija emas, balki imkoniyatlar tengligiga e'tibor qarating". Reuters. Olingan 24 iyul, 2012. ... Ehtimol, munozaralar va siyosat markazida xulosa keskin bo'linib, nima qilish mumkinligi chegaralari mavjud bo'lgan natijalardagi tengsizlikka emas, imkoniyatdagi tengsizlikka e'tibor qaratilishi kerak. ...
  119. ^ a b v d "Tengsizlik va harakatchanlik: imkoniyatlar tengligiga qarshi". Iqtisodchi. 2012 yil 20 aprel. Olingan 24 iyul, 2012. ... Natija tengligi va imkoniyatlar tengligi o'rtasidagi farq asosan xayoliydir. ...
  120. ^ Daniel Noulz (2012 yil 21-may). "'Imkoniyatlarning tengligi '- bu daromadlarning tengsizligi to'g'risida gapirish uchun mo'ljallangan shov-shuv ". Guardian. Olingan 24 iyul, 2012. ... Ammo sizning ota-onangiz qancha pul borligi va sizning ishingiz qanchalik yaxshi ekanligi o'rtasida to'g'ridan-to'g'ri bog'liqlik bor ko'rinadi.
  121. ^ Estlund, Devid, 2000, "Siyosiy sifat", Ijtimoiy falsafa va siyosat 17, 127–60-betlar.
  122. ^ a b Kollin Mey (kitob sharhlovchi) Jon Kekes (kitob muallifi) (22.06.2009). "Obzor:" Siyosat san'ati: Amerikaga yangi xiyonat va unga qanday qarshi turish kerak"". c2c jurnali. Olingan 8 sentyabr, 2011. Kekes "muvozanatli ko'rinish" deb atagan narsani g'oyaviy .... bilan taqqoslaydi.
  123. ^ Imkoniyatlar tengligiga qarshi | Matt Cavanagh | Tomoshabin tomonidan sharh Arxivlandi 2011 yil 4-may, soat Orqaga qaytish mashinasi
  124. ^ a b v d Timo'tiy Nuh (2000 yil 10 oktyabr). "Dinesh D'Souza va boshqalar" Imkoniyatlar tengligi"". Slate jurnali. Olingan 8 sentyabr, 2011. (D'Souza kitobiga sharh Obod turmushning fazilati)
  125. ^ Robert Nozik (1974), Anarxiya, shtat va Utopiya, Asosiy kitoblar, ISBN  0-465-00270-6, olingan 8 sentyabr, 2011, (235 bet)
  126. ^ a b Robert Nozik (1974), Anarxiya, shtat va Utopiya, Asosiy kitoblar, ISBN  0-465-00270-6, olingan 8 sentyabr, 2011, (235-betga qarang)

Tashqi havolalar