Matn tanqid - Textual criticism

Karmina Kantabrigiensiya, Qo'lyozma C, folio 436v, 11-asr

Matn tanqid ning filialidir matnli stipendiya, filologiya va of adabiy tanqid bu matn variantlarini yoki har xil variantlarini aniqlash bilan bog'liq qo'lyozmalar yoki bosma kitoblardan. Bunday matnlar xochga mixlangan mixxat yozilgan dastlabki davrlardan, masalan, 21-asr muallifi asarining ko'plab nashr etilmagan versiyalarigacha bo'lishi mumkin. Tarixiy jihatdan, ulamolar hujjatlarni nusxalash uchun maosh olganlar savodli bo'lganlar, ammo ko'plari shunchaki nusxa ko'chiruvchilar bo'lib, ularning ma'nosini tushunmasdan, harflarning shakllarini taqlid qilishgan. Bu shuni anglatadiki, qo'lyozmalarni qo'l bilan nusxalashda bilmagan holda o'zgartirishlar ko'p bo'lgan.^[1] Shuningdek, qasddan o'zgartirishlar kiritilgan bo'lishi mumkin, masalan, siyosiy, diniy yoki madaniy sabablarga ko'ra bosma nashrlarni senzuradan o'tkazish.

Matn tanqidchisi ishining maqsadi matnni va uning variantlarini yaratish va tarixiy etkazish to'g'risida yaxshiroq tushunishni ta'minlashdir. Ushbu tushuncha ilmiy nashr qilingan matnni o'z ichiga olgan "tanqidiy nashr" chiqarilishiga olib kelishi mumkin. Agar olimda qo'lyozmaning bir nechta versiyasi bo'lsa-da, ammo asl nusxasi ma'lum bo'lmagan bo'lsa, asl matnni iloji boricha yaqinroq tiklashga intilish uchun matn tanqidining belgilangan usullaridan foydalanish mumkin. Xuddi shu usullardan oraliq versiyalarni rekonstruksiya qilish uchun foydalanish mumkin, yoki nafaqalar, mavjud matn soni va sifatiga qarab, hujjatning transkripsiyasi tarixining.^[2]

Boshqa tomondan, olim nazarda tutgan bitta asl matn "deb nomlanadi matn (kontekstida Injil tadqiqotlari ), arxetip yoki imzo; ammo, har bir matn guruhi uchun bitta asl matn bo'lishi shart emas. Misol uchun, agar bir voqea tomonidan tarqatilgan bo'lsa og'zaki an'ana, so'ngra keyinchalik turli joylarda turli odamlar tomonidan yozilgan, versiyalar juda xilma-xil bo'lishi mumkin.

Matn tanqid qilish amaliyotida ko'plab yondashuvlar yoki usullar mavjud, xususan eklektizm, stemmatika va nusxa ko'chirish-matnni tahrirlash. Guvohlar o'rtasidagi matnni evolyutsion biologiya metodlari bilan o'zaro bog'liqligini aniqlash uchun miqdoriy metodlardan foydalaniladi (filogenetik ) bir qator an'analar bo'yicha samarali bo'lib ko'rinadi.^{[iqtibos kerak ]}

Ba'zi sohalarda, masalan, diniy va klassik matnni tahrirlashda, "pastki tanqid" iborasi matn tanqidiga va "yuqori tanqid "asl nusxaning muallifligi, tuzilish sanasi va joyini aniqlashga intilish matn.

Tarix

Matn tanqid qilish ikki ming yildan ortiq vaqtdan beri amal qilib kelinmoqda filologik san'at.^[3] Dastlabki matn tanqidchilari, ayniqsa kutubxonachilar Ellistik Iskandariya miloddan avvalgi ikki asrda asarlarini saqlab qolish bilan shug'ullangan qadimiylik va bu orqali davom etdi O'rta yosh ichiga erta zamonaviy davr va ixtirosi bosmaxona. Matn tanqid qilish ko'pchilikning muhim yo'nalishi edi Uyg'onish davri gumanistlari, kabi Desiderius Erasmus, kim tahrir qilgan Yunoniston Yangi Ahd, yaratish Textus Receptus. Italiyada kabi olimlar Petrarka va Poggio Brachiolini Lotin qo'lyozmalarining ko'pchiligini yig'di va tahrir qildi, matnli holatlarga e'tibor, masalan, tanqidiy izlanishning yangi ruhini kuchaytirdi. Lorenzo Valla da'vo qilinganlarga Konstantinning ehsoni.

Kabi ko'plab qadimiy asarlar Injil va Yunoniston fojialari, yuzlab nusxada saqlanib qoling va har bir nusxaning asl nusxasiga aloqasi noaniq bo'lishi mumkin. Matnshunos olimlar asrlar davomida qaysi manbalar asl nusxadan ko'proq olinganligi, shu sababli ushbu manbalardagi o'qishlar to'g'ri ekanligi haqida bahslashib kelmoqdalar.^{[iqtibos kerak ]} Yunoncha sahna asarlari singari harflar bo'lgan Injil kitoblari, ehtimol, bitta asl nusxaga ega bo'lishiga qaramay, ba'zi bir Injil kitoblari xuddi shunga o'xshashmi yoki yo'qmi degan savol. Xushxabar, hech qachon bitta asl nusxasi muhokama qilingan.^[4] Matn tanqidiga nisbatan qiziqish Qur'on kashf etilgandan keyin ham rivojlangan San'adagi qo'lyozmalar 1972 yilda, ehtimol 7-8 asrlarga to'g'ri keladi.

Ingliz tilida Uilyam Shekspir Matn tanqid qilish uchun juda qulay zamin bo'lgan - chunki matnlar uzatilganidek, juda ko'p xilma-xillikni o'z ichiga oladi va uning asarlarining yuqori nashrlarini ishlab chiqarish uchun sarf qilingan xarajatlar va xarajatlar har doim ham foydali deb hisoblangan.^[5] Matn tanqidining tamoyillari dastlab qadimgi asarlar va Injil uchun ishlab chiqilgan va takomillashtirilgan bo'lsa ham, ingliz-amerikalik nusxa ko'chirish-matn tahriri uchun Shekspir,^[6] zamonaviy matnlardan tortib to eng qadimgi yozma hujjatlarga qadar ko'plab asarlarga qo'llanilgan. Qadimdan boshlab Mesopotamiya va Misr yigirmanchi asrga qadar matn tanqidiyligi taxminan besh ming yillik davrni qamrab oladi.

Asosiy tushunchalar va maqsadlar

Tomonidan tavsiflangan asosiy muammo Pol Maas, quyidagicha:

Bizda yo'q imzo [asl muallif tomonidan yozilgan] ning qo'lyozmalari Yunoncha va Rim mumtoz yozuvchilar va nusxalari bo'lmagan to'qnashdi asl nusxalari bilan; bizda mavjud bo'lgan qo'lyozmalar asl nusxadan noma'lum oraliq nusxalar orqali olinadi va natijada shubhali ishonchga ega. Matn tanqidining biznesi asl nusxaga iloji boricha yaqinroq matn yaratishdir (textutus konstitutsiyasi).^[7]

Maas, "Muallif tomonidan qayta ko'rib chiqilgan diktant imzo qo'lyozmasiga teng deb baholanishi kerak", deb ta'kidlaydi. Imzo qo'lyozmalarining etishmasligi yunon va rim tillaridan tashqari ko'plab madaniyatlarga tegishli. Bunday vaziyatda asosiy maqsad birinchisini aniqlashga aylanadi namunali urf-odatdagi har qanday bo'linishdan oldin. Ushbu namuna "sifatida tanilgan arxetip. "Agar biz [arxetip] matnini o'rnatishga muvaffaq bo'lsak, the konstitutsiya (asl nusxasini qayta qurish) ancha rivojlangan.^[8]

Matn tanqidchisining asosiy maqsadi "tanqidiy nashr" ni ishlab chiqarishdir.^{[iqtibos kerak ]} Bu erda muallif aniqlagan matn asl nusxaga yaqinligini va unga qo'shib qo'yilgan apparat tanqidchisi yoki tanqidiy apparat. Tanqidiy apparat muallifning ishini uch qismdan iborat: birinchi navbatda, muharrir foydalangan dalillar ro'yxati yoki tavsifi (qo'lyozmalar nomlari yoki qisqartmalar deb nomlangan) sigla ); ikkinchidan, ushbu dalillarni tahrirlovchining tahlili (ba'zan oddiy ehtimollik reytingi),^{[iqtibos kerak ]}; uchinchidan, matnning rad etilgan variantlarini qayd etish (ko'pincha afzallik tartibida).^{[iqtibos kerak ][9]}

Jarayon

Folio Papirus 46, o'z ichiga olgan 2 Korinfliklarga 11:33–12:9

Arzon mexanik bosib chiqarishdan oldin adabiyotlar qo'l bilan nusxa ko'chirilgan va nusxa ko'chiruvchilar tomonidan ko'plab farqlar kiritilgan. Bosib chiqarish yoshi kitoblar kasbini keraksiz holga keltirdi. Chop etilgan nashrlar, qo'lda uzatish paytida paydo bo'lishi mumkin bo'lgan o'zgarishlarning tarqalishiga kamroq ta'sir ko'rsatsa ham, muallifning imzosidan farqlarni kiritishdan xoli emas. Yozuvchi o'z manbasini noto'g'ri nusxalash o'rniga, bastakor yoki bosmaxona asarni avtografdan farqli ravishda o'qishi yoki terishi mumkin.^[10] Har bir yozuvchi yoki printer turli xil xatolarga yo'l qo'yganligi sababli, yo'qolgan asl nusxasini qayta tiklashga ko'pincha ko'plab manbalardan olingan o'qishlar tanlovi yordam beradi. Ko'p manbalardan olingan tahrirlangan matn deyiladi eklektik. Ushbu yondashuvdan farqli o'laroq, ba'zi matn tanqidchilari bir nechta manbalardan o'qishni birlashtirmasdan, saqlanib qolgan eng yaxshi matnni aniqlashni afzal ko'rishadi.^[11]

Bitta, asl matnning turli xil hujjatlarini yoki "guvohlarini" taqqoslashda kuzatilgan farqlar deyiladi variantli o'qishlaryoki oddiygina variantlar yoki o'qishlar. Muallifning asl asarini qaysi bitta variant namoyish etishi har doim ham aniq emas. Matn tanqid qilish jarayonida har bir variant qanday qilib tasodifan (dublyatsiya qilish yoki tashlab qo'yish) yoki niyat bilan (uyg'unlashtirish yoki tsenzura) matnga kiritilganligini tushuntirishga harakat qilinadi, chunki ulamolar yoki nazoratchilar asl muallifning matnini nusxa ko'chirish orqali etkazishgan. Shuning uchun matn tanqidchisining vazifasi variantlarni saralash, ehtimol ehtimoli yuqori bo'lganlarni yo'q qilishdir un- asl nusxa, shuning uchun asl nusxani eng yaxshi taxmin qilish uchun mo'ljallangan "tanqidiy matn" yoki tanqidiy nashr. Shu bilan birga, tanqidiy matn variantli o'qishni hujjatlashtirishi kerak, shuning uchun taniqli nashrning o'quvchisi uchun mavjud guvohlarning qayta tiklangan asl nusxaga aloqasi aniq. Tanqidiy matnni o'rnatishda matn tanqidchisi ikkala "tashqi" dalillarni (har bir guvohning yoshi, isboti va mansubligi) va "ichki" yoki "jismoniy" mulohazalarni (muallif va yozuvchilar yoki printerlar nimaga ega bo'lishi mumkin edi) hisobga oladi. bajarildi).^[4]

Matnning ma'lum bo'lgan barcha variantlarini taqqoslash a deb nomlanadi variorum, ya'ni matnni tanqid qilish asari, bu erda barcha xilma-xilliklar va o'zgartirishlar yonma-yon o'rnatilib, o'quvchi matnni nashrga tayyorlashda matnli qarorlar qanday qabul qilinganligini kuzatishi mumkin.^[12] The Injil va asarlari Uilyam Shekspir tez-tez variorum nashrlarining mavzusi bo'lib kelgan bo'lsa-da, xuddi shu texnikalar boshqa ko'plab ishlarda kamroq chastotada qo'llanilgan, masalan, Uolt Uitmen "s Grass barglari,^[13]va nasriy asarlari Edvard Fitsjerald.^[14]

Eklektizm

Eklektizm ma'lum bir asl nusxada guvohlarning keng xilma-xilligi bilan maslahatlashish amaliyotini nazarda tutadi. Amaliyot printsipga asoslanib, translyatsiya tarixlari qanchalik ko'p bo'lsa, ular bir xil xatolarni takrorlash ehtimoli kamroq bo'ladi. Biror narsa nima qoldirsa, boshqalari uni saqlab qolishi mumkin; kim qo'shsa, boshqalari qo'shishi dargumon. Eklektizm, guvohlar o'rtasidagi qarama-qarshiliklarning dalillariga asoslanib, asl matnga oid xulosalar chiqarishga imkon beradi.

Eklektik o'qishlar, odatda, har bir o'qish uchun guvohlar soni haqida taassurot qoldiradi. Garchi guvohlarning aksariyati tomonidan qo'llab-quvvatlanadigan o'qishni afzal ko'rishsa-da, bu o'z-o'zidan amalga oshirilmaydi. Masalan, Shekspir pyesasining ikkinchi nashrida ikkala nashr o'rtasida sodir bo'lganligi ma'lum bo'lgan voqeaga ishora qiluvchi qo'shimcha bo'lishi mumkin. Garchi deyarli barcha qo'lyozmalarda qo'shimcha bo'lishi mumkin bo'lsa-da, matn tanqidchilari qo'shimchasiz asl nusxasini tiklashlari mumkin.

Jarayon natijasi - ko'plab guvohlarning o'qigan matnlari. Bu ma'lum bir qo'lyozmaning nusxasi emas va mavjud bo'lgan qo'lyozmalarning aksariyat qismidan chetga chiqishi mumkin. Faqat eklektik yondashuvda biron bir guvoh nazariy jihatdan ma'qul kelmaydi. Buning o'rniga, tanqidchi tashqi va ichki dalillarga tayanib, alohida guvohlar to'g'risida fikrlarni shakllantiradi.^[15]

19-asrning o'rtalaridan boshlab, u erda mavjud bo'lmagan eklektizm apriori bitta qo'lyozmaga moyillik, Yangi Ahdning yunoncha matnini tahrir qilishning dominant usuli bo'lgan (hozirda Birlashgan Injil Jamiyati, 5-nashr va Nestle-Aland, 28-nashr). Shunday bo'lsa-da, eng qadimgi qo'lyozmalar Aleksandriya matn turi, eng ko'p ma'qul bo'lganlar va tanqidiy matnda Aleksandriya moyilligi bor.^[16]

Tashqi dalillar

Tashqi dalillar har bir jismoniy guvohning dalili, uning sanasi, manbasi va boshqa taniqli guvohlar bilan bo'lgan munosabati. Tanqidchilar ko'pincha eng keksa guvohlar tomonidan qo'llab-quvvatlanadigan o'qishni afzal ko'rishadi. Xatolar to'planib qolishi sababli, eski qo'lyozmalarda kamroq xatolar bo'lishi kerak. Guvohlarning aksariyati tomonidan qo'llab-quvvatlanadigan o'qishlar odatda afzalroqdir, chunki ular baxtsiz hodisalar yoki individual tarafkashlikni aks ettirmaydi. Xuddi shu sabablarga ko'ra eng xil geografik guvohlarga ustunlik beriladi. Ba'zi qo'lyozmalar ularning tarkibiga alohida e'tibor berilganligini isbotlaydi, masalan, muqobil o'qishlarni chetiga qo'shib, hozirgi nusxasini tayyorlashda bir nechta oldingi nusxalari (namunalari) bilan maslahatlashganligini namoyish etadi. Boshqa omillar teng bo'lib, ular quyidagilardir eng yaxshi guvohlar. Matn tanqidchisining roli ushbu asosiy mezonlar ziddiyatli bo'lganda zarurdir. Masalan, odatda dastlabki nusxalar kamroq bo'ladi, keyinroq esa ko'proq nusxalar bo'ladi. Matn tanqidchisi ushbu mezonlarni muvozanatlashtirib, asl matnini aniqlashga harakat qiladi.

Boshqa ko'plab murakkab fikrlar mavjud. Masalan, kotibning ma'lum amaliyotidan yoki ma'lum bir davrdan chiqib ketadigan o'qishlar ishonchli deb topilishi mumkin, chunki yozuvchi o'z tashabbusi bilan odatdagi amaliyotdan chiqib ketishi ehtimoldan yiroq emas.^[17]

Ichki dalillar

Ichki dalillar - bu hujjatning jismoniy xususiyatlaridan mustaqil ravishda, matnning o'zidan kelib chiqadigan dalillar. Qaysi o'qish asl nusxada bo'lishi mumkinligini aniqlash uchun turli xil mulohazalardan foydalanish mumkin. Ba'zida bu fikrlar qarama-qarshi bo'lishi mumkin.^[17]

Ikkita umumiy fikr lotincha nomlarga ega ma'ruza brevior (qisqa o'qish) va lektio difficilior (qiyinroq o'qish). Birinchisi, ulamolar so'zlarni aniqlab olish yoki odatiga ko'ra ularni olib tashlaganidan ko'ra ko'proq qo'shishga moyil bo'lgan umumiy kuzatuvdir. Ikkinchisi, lectio difficilior potior (o'qish qanchalik qiyin bo'lsa), uyg'unlashuv tendentsiyasini tan oladi - matndagi ziddiyatlarni hal qilish. Ushbu printsipni qo'llash, o'qishni asl nusxasi bo'lishi qiyinroq bo'lishiga olib keladi (uyg'unlashtirilmagan). Bunday holatlarga, shuningdek, yozuvchilar o'zlari to'liq tushunmagan matnlarni soddalashtirish va tekislash kiradi.^[18]

Yana bir skribal tendentsiya deyiladi gomioteleuton, "o'xshash oxiri" ma'nosini anglatadi. Gomoyoteleuton ikki so'z / ibora / satr o'xshash harflar ketma-ketligi bilan tugaganda paydo bo'ladi. Yozuvchi birinchisini nusxalashni tugatgandan so'ng, ikkinchisiga o'tib, barcha oraliq so'zlarni qoldirib yuboradi. Homoioarche qachon ko'zni chetlab o'tishni anglatadi boshlanishlar ikkita satr o'xshash.^[19]

Tanqidchi, shuningdek, muallifning boshqa yozuvlarini o'rganib, qanday so'zlar va grammatik konstruktsiyalar uning uslubiga mos kelishini hal qilishi mumkin. Ichki dalillarni baholash, shuningdek, tanqidchiga individual qo'lyozmalarning ishonchliligini baholashga yordam beradigan ma'lumotlarni taqdim etadi. Shunday qilib, ichki va tashqi dalillarni ko'rib chiqish bog'liqdir.^{[iqtibos kerak ]}

Barcha tegishli omillarni ko'rib chiqib, matn tanqidchisi boshqa o'qishlar qanday paydo bo'lishini eng yaxshi tushuntirib beradigan o'qishga intiladi. Ushbu o'qish asl nusxaga ega bo'lish ehtimoli yuqori bo'lgan nomzoddir.^{[iqtibos kerak ]}

Matn tanqidining kanonlari

Luqo 11: 2 dyuym Sinay kodeksi

Turli olimlar ko'rsatmalar ishlab chiqdilar yoki kanonlar matnni tanqid qilish, matnning eng yaxshi o'qilishini aniqlashda tanqidchining fikrini amalga oshirishga rahbarlik qilish. Eng qadimgi biri edi Johann Albrecht Bengel (1687–1752), kim 1734 yilda nashr etgan Yunoniston Yangi Ahd. O'zining sharhida u qoidani o'rnatdi Proclivi striptioni birinchi o'rinda turadi, ("qiyinroq o'qishni afzal ko'rish kerak").^[20]

Yoxann Yakob Grisbax (1745-1812) Yangi Ahdning bir nechta nashrlarini nashr etdi. Uning 1796 yilgi nashrida,^[21] u o'n besh tanqidiy qoidalarni o'rnatdi. Ular orasida Bengel hukmronligining bir varianti bor edi, Lectio difficilior potior, "qiyinroq o'qish yaxshiroqdir." Boshqasi edi Lectio brevior praeferenda, "Qisqa o'qish yaxshiroq", degan fikrga asoslanib, ulamolar yo'q qilishdan ko'ra ko'proq qo'shilishi mumkin edi.^[22] Ushbu qoidani tanqidiy ravishda qo'llash mumkin emas, chunki ulamolar materialni bexabar qoldirib ketishlari mumkin.

Bruk Foss Vestkott (1825-1901) va Fenton Xort (1828-1892) ning nashrini nashr etdi 1881 yilda yunon tilida Yangi Ahd. Ular to'qqizta tanqidiy qoidalarni, shu jumladan Bengel qoidalarining versiyasini taklif qildilar: "O'qish asl nusxada bo'lishi ehtimoldan yiroq, qiyinchiliklarni yumshatishga moyilligini ko'rsatmoqda". Ular, shuningdek, "o'qishlar ularning yordamchi guvohlarining soniga emas, balki sifatiga qarab ma'qullanadi yoki rad etiladi" va "O'qishga boshqalarning mavjudligini eng mos ravishda tushuntirib beradigan narsalarga ustunlik berish kerak" deb ta'kidladilar.^[23]

Ushbu qoidalarning aksariyati, dastlab Muqaddas Kitobdagi matnni tanqid qilish uchun ishlab chiqilgan bo'lsa-da, uzatish xatolariga ta'sir qiladigan har qanday matnga nisbatan keng qo'llaniladi.

Eklektizmning cheklovlari

Tanqid kanonlari izohlashga juda moyil va ba'zan bir-biriga zid bo'lganligi sababli, ular matn tanqidchisining estetik yoki diniy kun tartibiga mos keladigan natijani tasdiqlash uchun ishlatilishi mumkin. 19-asrdan boshlab olimlar tahririyat hukmiga rahbarlik qilishning yanada qat'iy usullarini qidirdilar. Stemmatika va nusxa ko'chirish matnini tahrirlash - ikkalasi ham eklektik, chunki ular bir nechta manbalardan o'qishlarni tanlashga ruxsat berishadi - bir yoki bir nechta guvohlarni "ob'ektiv" mezonlarga ko'ra maqbul deb topib sub'ektivlikni kamaytirishga intilishgan.^{[iqtibos kerak ]} Amaldagi manbalarga va muqobil o'qishlarga, asl matn va tasvirlardan foydalanilgan holda ma'lumot berish o'quvchilarga va boshqa tanqidchilarga tanqidchining tadqiqot chuqurligini aniqlashga va ularning ishlarini mustaqil ravishda tekshirishga yordam beradi.

Stemmatika

Umumiy nuqtai

Ning qo'lyozmalarini tushirish sxemasi Psevdo-Apuleius Gerbarius tomonidan Genri E. Sigerist (1927)

Stemmatika yoki stemmatologiya matn tanqidiga qat'iy yondashishdir. Karl Laxman (1793–1851) bu usulni ixtiro qilmasa ham, uni mashhur qilishiga katta hissa qo'shdi.^[24] Usul o'z nomini so'zdan oladi stemma. The Qadimgi yunoncha so'z mkmabaa^[25] va uning qarz yilda klassik lotin stemmata^[25][26][27] "ga murojaat qilishi mumkinoilaviy daraxtlar ". Ushbu o'ziga xos ma'no tirik qolgan guvohlarning munosabatlarini ko'rsatadi (bunday stemmaning ma'lum bo'lgan birinchi misoli, ismsiz bo'lsa ham, 1827 yilga tegishli).^[28] Shajarani shuningdek a deb ham atashadi kladogramma.^[29] Usul "xatolar hamjamiyati kelib chiqish jamoasini nazarda tutadi" degan tamoyil asosida ishlaydi. Ya'ni, agar ikkita guvohning umumiy xatolari bo'lsa, ular a deb nomlangan umumiy oraliq manbadan kelib chiqqan deb taxmin qilish mumkin. giparxetip. Yo'qotilgan qidiruv vositalar o'rtasidagi munosabatlar xuddi shu jarayon bilan belgilanadi, barcha mavjud qo'lyozmalarni nasab daraxtiga yoki stemma codicum yakkalikdan kelib chiqqan arxetip. Stemma qurish jarayoni deyiladi nafaqayoki lotin recensio.^[30]

Stemmani tugatgandan so'ng, tanqidchi chaqirilgan keyingi bosqichga o'tadi tanlov yoki tanlov, bu erda arxetip matni eng yaqin giparxetiplardan tortib to arxetipgacha variantlarni o'rganish va eng yaxshilarini tanlash orqali aniqlanadi. Agar bitta o'qish boshqasiga qaraganda daraxtning bir darajasida tez-tez sodir bo'lsa, unda dominant o'qish tanlanadi. Agar ikkita raqobatdosh o'qishlar teng ravishda tez-tez sodir bo'lsa, unda muharrir to'g'ri o'qishni tanlash uchun hukmdan foydalanadi.^[31]

Keyin tanlov, matnda hanuzgacha xatolar bo'lishi mumkin, chunki biron bir manbada to'g'ri o'qishni saqlamaydigan joylar bo'lishi mumkin. Qadam imtihon, yoki imtihon korruptsiyani topish uchun qo'llaniladi. Qaerda muharrir matn buzilgan degan xulosaga kelsa, u "emendatsiya" yoki emendatsiya (ba'zan ham chaqiriladi divinatsiya). Ba'zan ma'lum bir manba tomonidan qo'llab-quvvatlanmaydigan tahrirlar deyiladi taxminiy emissiyalar.^[32]

Jarayoni tanlov eklektik matn tanqidiga o'xshaydi, lekin gipotetik giparxetiplarning cheklangan to'plamiga nisbatan qo'llaniladi. Ning qadamlari imtihon va emendatsiya nusxa ko'chirish-matn tahririga o'xshaydi. Darhaqiqat, boshqa usullarni stemmatika holatlari sifatida ko'rib chiqish mumkin, bunda matnning qat'iy oilaviy tarixini aniqlash mumkin emas, faqat taxminiy hisoblanadi. Agar bitta qo'lyozma eng yaxshi matn bo'lib tuyulsa, matn nusxasini tahrirlash o'rinli bo'ladi va agar bir guruh qo'lyozmalar yaxshi bo'lsa, u holda bu guruhdagi eklektizm to'g'ri bo'ladi.^[33]

Yunoniston Yangi Ahdining Xodjes-Farstad nashri ba'zi qismlar uchun stemmatika ishlatishga urindi.^[34]

Filogenetik

Canterbury ertaklari, Woodcut 1484

Filogenetik qarz olgan texnikadir biologiya, dastlab u qaerda nomlangan filogenetik sistematikasi tomonidan Villi Xenig. Biologiyada texnikani aniqlash uchun foydalaniladi evolyutsion turli xil munosabatlar turlari.^[35] Matn tanqidida qo'llashda bir qator turli xil guvohlarning matni kompyuterga kiritilishi mumkin, bu ular orasidagi barcha farqlarni qayd qiladi yoki mavjud bo'lgan apparatdan kelib chiqadi. Keyin qo'lyozmalar umumiy xususiyatlariga ko'ra guruhlanadi. Filogenetikaning an'anaviy statistik tahlil shakllaridan farqi shundaki, qo'lyozmalarni umumiy o'xshashligiga qarab qo'pol guruhlarga ajratish o'rniga, filogenetika ularni tarvaqaylab turadigan shajaraning bir qismi deb hisoblaydi va ular orasidagi munosabatlarni yaratish uchun ushbu taxmindan foydalanadi. Bu uni stemmatika uchun avtomatlashtirilgan yondashuvga o'xshatadi. Biroq, farq bo'lgan joyda, kompyuter qaysi o'qish asl matnga yaqinroq ekanligini aniqlashga urinmaydi va shu bilan daraxtning qaysi shoxi "ildiz" ekanligini ko'rsatmaydi - qaysi qo'lyozma an'anasi asl nusxaga yaqinroq. Buning uchun boshqa dalil turlaridan foydalanish kerak.

Filogenetika matnni tanqid qilish bilan bir xil qiyinchiliklarga duch keladi: ajdod avlodiga xos xususiyatlarning paydo bo'lishi, ajdodni to'g'ridan-to'g'ri nusxalash (yoki noto'g'ri nusxalash) bilan bog'liq, masalan, yozuvchi ikki yoki undan ortiq turli xil qo'lyozmalardagi o'qishni birlashtirganda ("ifloslanish"). Xuddi shu hodisa tirik organizmlar orasida keng tarqalgan, masalan gorizontal genlarning uzatilishi (yoki lateral gen uzatilishi) va genetik rekombinatsiya ayniqsa bakteriyalar orasida. Ushbu muammolarga qarshi kurashish uchun tirik organizmlar va matn an'analari bo'yicha turli xil usullarni qo'llashni yanada o'rganish istiqbolli yo'nalish hisoblanadi.^[36]

Biologiyada foydalanish uchun ishlab chiqilgan dastur matn tanqidiga muvaffaqiyatli tatbiq etildi; masalan, tomonidan ishlatilmoqda Canterbury ertaklari loyihasi^[37] saqlanib qolgan 84 qo'lyozma va to'rtta dastlabki bosma nashr o'rtasidagi bog'liqlikni aniqlash Canterbury ertaklari. Dantening "Komediya" si Shou tomonidan nashr etilgan Dante matnining ettita dastlabki guvohlari o'rtasidagi munosabatlarni har tomonlama o'rganishda bir-birlari bilan birga filogenetik va an'anaviy usullardan foydalaniladi.^[38]

Cheklovlar va tanqid

Stemmatika usuli har bir guvoh bittadan, faqat bittadan avvalgisidan kelib chiqqan deb taxmin qiladi. Agar yozuvchi o'z nusxasini yaratishda bir nechta manbaga ishora qilsa, unda yangi nusxa shajaraning bitta shoxiga tushmasligi aniq. Stemmatika usulida bir nechta manbalardan olingan qo'lyozma deyiladi ifloslangan.

Usul shuningdek, ulamolar faqat yangi xatolarga yo'l qo'yishadi - ular avvalgilarining xatolarini tuzatishga urinishmaydi. Yozuvchi tomonidan matn yaxshilanganida, u shunday deyiladi murakkab, ammo "nafosat" hujjatning boshqa guvohlar bilan bo'lgan munosabatini yashirgan holda va uslubni stemma-da to'g'ri joylashtirishni qiyinlashtiradigan usulni buzadi.

Stemmatika usuli matn tanqidchisidan qo'lyozmalarni xatolarning umumiyligi bo'yicha guruhlashni talab qiladi. Shu sababli, tanqidchi xato o'qishni to'g'ri o'qishni ajrata olishi talab qilinadi. Ushbu taxmin ko'pincha hujumga uchragan. V. V. Greg "Agar kotib xato qilsa, u muqarrar ravishda bema'nilik keltirib chiqaradi, bu jim va mutlaqo asossiz taxmindir".^[39]

Frants Anton Knittel ilohiyotshunoslikdagi an'anaviy nuqtai nazarni himoya qildi va zamonaviy matn tanqidiga qarshi edi. U haqiqiyligini himoya qildi Adulterae Pericopa (Yuhanno 7: 53-8: 11), Vergul Johanneum (1 Yuhanno 5: 7) va Testimonium Flavianum. Unga ko'ra Erasmus uning ichida Novum Instrumentum hamma uchun o'z ichiga olmadi Vergul dan Montfortianus kodeksi, grammatik farqlar tufayli, lekin ishlatilgan Komplutensian poliglotasi. Unga ko'ra Vergul uchun ma'lum bo'lgan Tertullian.^[40]

Stemmatik usulning yakuniy bosqichi emendatsiya, ba'zida "taxminiy emendatsiya" deb ham ataladi. Ammo aslida, tanqidchi jarayonning har bir qadamida gumonlardan foydalanadi. Tahririyat qarorini qisqartirishga qaratilgan ba'zi bir uslub qoidalari to'g'ri natijani keltirib chiqarmaydi. Masalan, daraxtning bir darajasida ikkitadan ortiq guvoh bo'lgan joyda, odatda tanqidchi ustun o'qishni tanlaydi. Biroq, ma'lum bir o'qishni taqdim etgan ko'plab guvohlarning omon qolganligi shunchaki baxtli bo'lishi mumkin. Kamroq uchraydigan ishonchli o'qish, shunga qaramay, to'g'ri bo'lishi mumkin.^[41]

Va nihoyat, stemmatik usul har bir mavjud guvohni uzoqdan bo'lsa ham bitta manbadan olishini taxmin qiladi. Asl muallif o'z asarini qayta ko'rib chiqishi mumkinligi va matn turli vaqtlarda bir nechta nufuzli versiyada mavjud bo'lishi mumkinligini hisobga olmaydi.

Eng yaxshi matnli tahrir

Tanqidchi Jozef Bedier Stemmatika bilan ishlagan (1864-1938), 1928 yilda ushbu uslubga qarshi hujum boshladi. U stemmatika usuli bilan ishlab chiqarilgan o'rta asr frantsuz tilidagi matnlarning nashrlarini o'rganib chiqdi va matn tanqidchilari asosan ikkiga bo'lingan daraxtlarni yaratishga intilayotganlarini aniqladilar. faqat ikkita filial. Uning so'zlariga ko'ra, bu natija tasodifan yuzaga kelishi ehtimoldan yiroq emas va shuning uchun bu usul guvohlarning haqiqiy tarixidan qat'i nazar, ikki tomonlama stemma hosil qilishga moyil. U tahrirlovchilar ikkita novdali daraxtlarni yaxshi ko'rishga moyil ekanliklaridan gumon qildi, chunki bu tahririyatning hukm qilish imkoniyatlarini maksimal darajaga ko'taradi (chunki guvohlar kelishmasa, "galstukni buzadigan" uchinchi filial bo'lmaydi). U shuningdek, ko'plab ishlar uchun bir nechta oqilona stemma qo'yilishi mumkinligini ta'kidladi va bu usul uning tarafdorlari aytganidek qat'iy yoki ilmiy emasligini ko'rsatdi.

Bédierning stemmatik uslubga bo'lgan shubhasi uni butunlay tashlab yuborish mumkinmi yoki yo'qmi deb o'ylashga majbur qildi. Stemmatika alternativasi sifatida Bédier eng yaxshi matnli tahrirlash usulini taklif qildi, unda muharrir tomonidan "yaxshi" matn holatiga ega deb topilgan bitta matnli guvoh, aniq translyatsiya xatolari uchun iloji boricha engilroq tahrir qilingan, ammo boshqacha qoldirilgan o'zgarishsiz. Bu eng yaxshi matnli nashrni asosan hujjatli nashrga aylantiradi. Masalan, Evgeniy Vinaverning Malori qo'lyozmasi Vinchesterning nashriga murojaat qilish mumkin Le Morte d'Arthur.

Matnni nusxalash

Dan sahifa Vatikan Graecus kodeksi 1209 O'rta asr kotibini (birinchi va ikkinchi ustunlar orasidagi chekka yozuv) matnni o'zgartirganligi uchun avvalgisini tanqid qilganini ko'rsatadi: "Ahmoq va tiz cho'k, eski o'qishni tashla, uni o'zgartirma!"^[42]

Matnni nusxalashda tahrir qilishda olim asosiy matndagi xatolarni, ko'pincha boshqa guvohlar yordamida tuzatadi. Ko'pincha, asosiy matn matnning eng qadimgi qo'lyozmasidan tanlanadi, ammo chop etishning dastlabki kunlarida nusxa matni ko'pincha qo'lda bo'lgan qo'lyozma edi.

Nusxalash-matn usuli yordamida tanqidchi asosiy matnni tekshiradi va asosiy matn tanqidchiga noto'g'ri ko'rinadigan joylarda tuzatishlar (ementsiyalar deb ataladi). Buni asosiy matndan mantiqiy bo'lmagan joylarni qidirish yoki ustun o'qish uchun boshqa guvohlarning matniga qarash orqali amalga oshirish mumkin. Yaqindan qo'ng'iroq qilish bo'yicha qarorlar odatda matn nusxasi foydasiga hal qilinadi.

Yunon tilining birinchi nashr etilgan, bosilgan nashri Yangi Ahd ushbu usul bilan ishlab chiqarilgan. Erasmus, muharriri, Bazeldagi mahalliy Dominikan monastiridan qo'lyozma tanlab oldi va boshqa mahalliy qo'lyozmalar bilan maslahatlashib, aniq xatolarini tuzatdi. The Vestkott va Hort uchun asos bo'lgan matn Qayta ko'rib chiqilgan versiya inglizcha Injildan, shuningdek, nusxa ko'chirish-matn usulidan foydalanilgan Vatikan kodeksi asosiy qo'lyozma sifatida.^[43]

MakKerrouning nusxa ko'chirish-matn haqidagi tushunchasi

Bibliograf Ronald B. McKerrow atamasini kiritdi nusxa ko'chirish-matn ning 1904 yilgi nashrida Tomas Nashe, uni "har bir alohida holatda ishlatiladigan matn mening asosim" deb ta'riflagan. MakKerrou stemmatik uslubning cheklanganligini bilar edi va ayniqsa ishonchli deb hisoblangan bitta matnni tanlab, keyin faqat matn buzilgan joyda nashr etishni yanada oqilona deb bilardi. Frantsuz tanqidchisi Jozef Bedier xuddi shu tarzda stemmatik uslubdan nafratlanib, muharrir mavjud bo'lgan eng yaxshi matnni tanlashi va imkon qadar kamroq nashr qilishi kerak degan xulosaga keldi.

Dastlab kiritilgan McKerrow uslubida nusxa ko'chirish matni eng qadimgi matn bo'lishi shart emas edi. Ba'zi hollarda, MakKerrou keyinchalik guvohni tanlab, "agar muharrirda ma'lum bir matn boshqa tuzatmalarga nisbatan keyinroq tuzatishlarni o'zida mujassam etgan deb taxmin qilishga asos bo'lsa va shu bilan birga ushbu tuzatishlar yoki ularning ayrimlariga ishonmaslik uchun asos bo'lmasa. hech bo'lmaganda muallifning ishi, uning matnini qayta nashr etishning asosiga aylantirishdan boshqa iloji yo'q. "^[44]

1939 yilga kelib uning Oksford Shekspir uchun prolegomena, McKerrow ushbu yondashuv haqida fikrini o'zgartirdi, chunki u keyingi nashr - mualliflik tuzatishlarini o'z ichiga olgan bo'lsa ham - "muallifning asl qo'lyozmasidan dastlabki nashrga qaraganda ancha kengroq og'ishidan" qo'rqardi. Shuning uchun u to'g'ri protsedura "dastlabki" yaxshi "bosmadan nusxa ko'chirish matni sifatida foydalanish va unga o'z ichiga olgan birinchi nashrdan boshlab, muallifdan olingan ko'rinishi kabi tuzatishlarni kiritish orqali ishlab chiqariladi" degan xulosaga keldi. Ammo tahririyat hukmining o'zboshimchalik bilan amalga oshirilishidan qo'rqib, McKerrow, keyingi nashrda muallifga tegishli mazmunli tuzatishlar bo'lgan degan xulosaga kelib, "biz ushbu nashrning barcha o'zgarishlarini qabul qilishimiz kerak, aniq xatolar yoki noto'g'ri nashrlar kabi ko'rinadigan har qanday narsani saqlab qolishimiz kerak".^[45]

V. V. Gregning nusxa ko'chirish matnining mantiqiy asoslari

20-asrning so'nggi yarmida ingliz-amerikalik matn tanqidlari tomonidan 1950 yilgi muhim insho hukmronlik qildi Ser Valter V. Greg, "Nusxalash-matn asoslari". Greg taklif qildi:

[A] matnning o'qilishi, ya'ni muallifning ma'nosiga yoki uning ifoda mohiyatiga ta'sir ko'rsatadigan muhim yoki men ularni "mazmunli" deb o'qiydiganlar va umuman boshqalari, masalan, imlo, tinish belgilari, so'zlar o'rtasidagi farq. bo'linish va shunga o'xshash narsalar, asosan uning rasmiy taqdimotiga ta'sir qiladi, bu baxtsiz hodisalar yoki men ularni "tasodif" deb atashim mumkin deb hisoblanishi mumkin.^[46]

Greg, bosmaxonalardagi kompozitorlar o'zlarining nusxalarini "mohiyatli" o'qishlariga sodiqlik bilan rioya qilishga moyilligini kuzatdi, agar ular bilmasdan chetga chiqishgan bo'lsa; ammo "tasodiflarga kelsak, ular odatda o'z odatlariga yoki moyilligiga rioya qilishadi, garchi ular turli sabablarga ko'ra va turli darajalarda ularning nusxalari ta'sirida bo'lishsa ham."^[47]

U xulosa qildi:

Haqiqiy nazariya shundan iboratki, nusxa ko'chirish matni (umuman) tasodiflar masalasini boshqarishi kerak, ammo mazmunli o'qishlar orasidagi tanlov matn tanqidining umumiy nazariyasiga tegishli va bu nusxaning tor printsipidan tashqarida. matn. Shunday qilib, shunday bo'lishi mumkinki, tanqidiy nashrda to'g'ri nusxa sifatida tanlangan matn har qanday holatda, o'zgaruvchan holatlarda eng mazmunli o'qishni ta'minlaydigan matn bo'lmasligi mumkin. Ushbu farqni qilmaslik va ushbu printsipni qo'llamaslik, tabiiyki, nashr uchun asos sifatida tanlangan matnga juda yaqin va juda umumiy bog'liqlikka olib keldi va nusxa matnining zulmi, zulm deb atash mumkin bo'lgan narsa paydo bo'ldi. bu, mening fikrimcha, o'tgan avlodning eng yaxshi tahririyat ishlarining aksariyatini qo'zg'atdi.^[48]

Qisqacha aytganda, Gregning fikriga ko'ra, "nusxa ko'chirish matniga haddan tashqari minish va hatto ustunlik berishga yo'l qo'yilmaydi" hokimiyat moddiy o'qishlar haqida gap ketganda. "O'rtacha raqobatbardosh o'qishlar orasidagi tanlov u shunday dedi:

[W] qisman fikriga ko'ra aniqlanadi, muharrir tashqi vakolatlar masalasi bo'lgan har bir moddiy nashr bosilgan nusxaning xususiyatiga qarab shakllanishi mumkin; qisman bir nechta matnlarning ichki vakolati, undagi aniq xatolarning nisbiy chastotasiga qarab; qisman muharrir tomonidan individual o'qishlarning o'ziga xosligi haqidagi ichki da'volarni hukm qilish yo'li bilan - boshqacha qilib aytganda ularning o'ziga xos fazilati, shunda biz "savob" degani ekan, biz ularning shaxsiy didiga murojaat qilish o'rniga muallif yozgan bo'lish ehtimolini tushunamiz. muharriri.^[49]

Greg muharrir raqobatbardosh mazmunli o'qishlar orasida tanlov qilish uchun o'z qaroridan foydalanishda erkin bo'lishi kerak deb ta'kidlagan bo'lsa-da, "ikkita o'qishning da'volari mutlaqo muvozanatli ko'rinishda bo'lganida, muharrir nusxa matnini kechiktirishi kerak." Bunday holatda, nusxa ko'chirish matniga ustunlik berish uchun mantiqiy sabablar bo'lmasligi mumkin bo'lsa-da, amalda, agar uning o'qilishini o'zgartirish uchun sabab bo'lmasa, aniq narsa uning turishiga yo'l qo'ygandek tuyuladi. "^[50] "To'liq muvozanatli" variantlar deyiladi befarq.

Gregning mantiqiy asoslariga rioya qilgan muharrirlar eklektik nashrlar, chunki "tasodiflar" uchun vakolat muharrir nufuzli deb hisoblagan ma'lum bir manbadan (odatda eng qadimgi manbadan) olinadi, ammo "asoslar" uchun vakolat har bir alohida holatda muharrirning qaroriga binoan belgilanadi . Olingan matn, tasodiflardan tashqari, asosan biron bir guvohga tayanmasdan tuzilgan.

Greg – Bowers – Tanselle

V. V. Greg o'zining nusxa ko'chirish matnining mantiqiy asoslarini asarlarning har qanday haqiqiy nashrlariga tatbiq etish uchun uzoq yashamadi. Uning mantiqiy asoslari qabul qilindi va sezilarli darajada kengaytirildi Fredson Bouers (1905-1991). 1970-yillardan boshlab, G. Tomas Tanselle shiddat bilan usulni himoya qildi va o'zining muhim hissalarini qo'shdi. Bower va Tansel tomonidan qo'llaniladigan Gregning mantiqiy asoslari "Greg-Bowers" yoki "Greg-Bowers-Tanselle" usuli sifatida tanilgan.

Barcha davrlarning ishlariga ariza berish

Uilyam Shekspir, Yoz kechasi tushi (Birinchi folio )

In his 1964 essay, "Some Principles for Scholarly Editions of Nineteenth-Century American Authors", Bowers said that "the theory of copy-text proposed by Sir Walter Greg rules supreme".^[51] Bowers's assertion of "supremacy" was in contrast to Greg's more modest claim that "My desire is rather to provoke discussion than to lay down the law".^[52]

Whereas Greg had limited his illustrative examples to English Renaissance drama, where his expertise lay, Bowers argued that the rationale was "the most workable editorial principle yet contrived to produce a critical text that is authoritative in the maximum of its details whether the author be Shekspir, Dryden, Fielding, Nathaniel Hawthorne, yoki Stiven Kreyn. The principle is sound without regard for the literary period."^[53] For works where an author's manuscript survived—a case Greg had not considered—Bowers concluded that the manuscript should generally serve as copy-text. Citing the example of Nathaniel Hawthorne, he noted:

When an author's manuscript is preserved, this has paramount authority, of course. Yet the fallacy is still maintained that since the first edition was proofread by the author, it must represent his final intentions and hence should be chosen as copy-text. Practical experience shows the contrary. When one collates the manuscript of Etti Gobel uyi against the first printed edition, one finds an average of ten to fifteen differences per page between the manuscript and the print, many of them consistent alterations from the manuscript system of punctuation, capitalization, spelling, and word-division. It would be ridiculous to argue that Hawthorne made approximately three to four thousand small changes in proof, and then wrote the manuscript of Blithedale romantikasi according to the same system as the manuscript of the Etti Gables, a system that he had rejected in proof.^[54]

Following Greg, the editor would then replace any of the manuscript readings with substantives from printed editions that could be reliably attributed to the author: "Obviously, an editor cannot simply reprint the manuscript, and he must substitute for its readings any words that he believes Hawthorne changed in proof."^[54]

Uninfluenced final authorial intention

McKerrow had articulated textual criticism's goal in terms of "our ideal of an author's fair copy of his work in its final state".^[55] Bowers asserted that editions founded on Greg's method would "represent the nearest approximation in every respect of the author's final intentions."^[56] Bowers stated similarly that the editor's task is to "approximate as nearly as possible an inferential authorial fair copy."^[57] Tanselle notes that, "Textual criticism ... has generally been undertaken with a view to reconstructing, as accurately as possible, the text finally intended by the author".^[58]

Bowers and Tanselle argue for rejecting textual variants that an author inserted at the suggestion of others. Bowers said that his edition of Stiven Kreyn birinchi roman, Maggi, presented "the author's final and uninfluenced artistic intentions."^[59] In his writings, Tanselle refers to "unconstrained authorial intention" or "an author's uninfluenced intentions."^[60] This marks a departure from Greg, who had merely suggested that the editor inquire whether a later reading "is one that the author can reasonably be supposed to have substituted for the former",^[61] not implying any further inquiry as to nima uchun the author had made the change.

Tanselle discusses the example of Xerman Melvill "s Typee. After the novel's initial publication, Melville's publisher asked him to soften the novel's criticisms of missionaries in the South Seas. Although Melville pronounced the changes an improvement, Tanselle rejected them in his edition, concluding that "there is no evidence, internal or external, to suggest that they are the kinds of changes Melville would have made without pressure from someone else."^[62]

Bowers confronted a similar problem in his edition of Maggi. Crane originally printed the novel privately in 1893. To secure commercial publication in 1896, Crane agreed to remove profanity, but he also made stylistic revisions. Bowers's approach was to preserve the stylistic and literary changes of 1896, but to revert to the 1893 readings where he believed that Crane was fulfilling the publisher's intention rather than his own. There were, however, intermediate cases that could reasonably have been attributed to either intention, and some of Bowers's choices came under fire—both as to his judgment, and as to the wisdom of conflating readings from the two different versions of Maggi.^[63]

Hans Zeller argued that it is impossible to tease apart the changes Crane made for literary reasons and those made at the publisher's insistence:

Firstly, in anticipation of the character of the expected censorship, Crane could be led to undertake alterations which also had literary value in the context of the new version. Secondly, because of the systematic character of the work, purely censorial alterations sparked off further alterations, determined at this stage by literary considerations. Again in consequence of the systemic character of the work, the contamination of the two historical versions in the edited text gives rise to a third version. Though the editor may indeed give a rational account of his decision at each point on the basis of the documents, nevertheless to aim to produce the ideal text which Crane would have produced in 1896 if the publisher had left him complete freedom is to my mind just as unhistorical as the question of how the first World War or the history of the United States would have developed if Germany had not caused the USA to enter the war in 1917 by unlimited submarine combat. The nonspecific form of censorship described above is one of the historical conditions under which Crane wrote the second version of Maggi and made it function. From the text which arose in this way it is not possible to subtract these forces and influences, in order to obtain a text of the author's own. Indeed I regard the "uninfluenced artistic intentions" of the author as something which exists only in terms of aesthetic abstraction. Between influences on the author and influences on the text are all manner of transitions.^[64]

Bowers and Tanselle recognize that texts often exist in more than one authoritative version. Tanselle argues that:

[T]wo types of revision must be distinguished: that which aims at altering the purpose, direction, or character of a work, thus attempting to make a different sort of work out of it; and that which aims at intensifying, refining, or improving the work as then conceived (whether or not it succeeds in doing so), thus altering the work in degree but not in kind. If one may think of a work in terms of a spatial metaphor, the first might be labeled "vertical revision," because it moves the work to a different plane, and the second "horizontal revision," because it involves alterations within the same plane. Both produce local changes in active intention; but revisions of the first type appear to be in fulfillment of an altered programmatic intention or to reflect an altered active intention in the work as a whole, whereas those of the second do not.^[65]

He suggests that where a revision is "horizontal" (ya'ni, aimed at improving the work as originally conceived), then the editor should adopt the author's later version. But where a revision is "vertical" (ya'ni, fundamentally altering the work's intention as a whole), then the revision should be treated as a new work, and edited separately on its own terms.

Format for apparatus

Bowers was also influential in defining the form of tanqidiy apparat that should accompany a scholarly edition. Ga qo'shimcha ravishda tarkib of the apparatus, Bowers led a movement to relegate editorial matter to appendices, leaving the critically established text "in the clear", that is, free of any signs of editorial intervention. Tanselle explained the rationale for this approach:

In the first place, an editor's primary responsibility is to establish a text; whether his goal is to reconstruct that form of the text which represents the author's final intention or some other form of the text, his essential task is to produce a reliable text according to some set of principles. Relegating all editorial matter to an appendix and allowing the text to stand by itself serves to emphasize the primacy of the text and permits the reader to confront the literary work without the distraction of editorial comment and to read the work with ease. A second advantage of a clear text is that it is easier to quote from or to reprint. Although no device can insure accuracy of quotation, the insertion of symbols (or even footnote numbers) into a text places additional difficulties in the way of the quoter. Furthermore, most quotations appear in contexts where symbols are inappropriate; thus when it is necessary to quote from a text which has not been kept clear of apparatus, the burden of producing a clear text of the passage is placed on the quoter. Even footnotes at the bottom of the text pages are open to the same objection, when the question of a photographic reprint arises.^[66]

Some critics believe that a clear-text edition gives the edited text too great a prominence, relegating textual variants to appendices that are difficult to use, and suggesting a greater sense of certainty about the established text than it deserves. As Shillingsburg notes, "English scholarly editions have tended to use notes at the foot of the text page, indicating, tacitly, a greater modesty about the "established" text and drawing attention more forcibly to at least some of the alternative forms of the text".^[67]

The MLA's CEAA and CSE

1963 yilda Amerikaning zamonaviy tillar assotsiatsiyasi (MLA) established the Center for Editions of American Authors (CEAA). The CEAA's Statement of Editorial Principles and Procedures, first published in 1967, adopted the Greg–Bowers rationale in full. A CEAA examiner would inspect each edition, and only those meeting the requirements would receive a seal denoting "An Approved Text."

Between 1966 and 1975, the Center allocated more than $1.5 million in funding from the National Endowment for the Humanities to various scholarly editing projects, which were required to follow the guidelines (including the structure of editorial apparatus) as Bowers had defined them.^[68] According to Davis, the funds coordinated by the CEAA over the same period were more than $6 million, counting funding from universities, university presses, and other bodies.^[69]

The Center for Scholarly Editions (CSE) replaced the CEAA in 1976. The change of name indicated the shift to a broader agenda than just American authors. The Center also ceased its role in the allocation of funds. The Center's latest guidelines (2003) no longer prescribe a particular editorial procedure.^[70]

Application to religious documents

All texts are subject to investigation and systematic criticism where the original verified first document is not available. Imonlilar muqaddas matnlar and scriptures sometimes are reluctant to accept any form of challenge to what they believe to be divine revelation. Some opponents and polemicists may look for any way to find fault with a particular religious text. Legitimate textual criticism may be resisted by both believers and skeptics.

Mormon kitobi

Oxirgi kun avliyolari Iso Masihning cherkovi (LDS cherkovi ) o'z ichiga oladi Mormon kitobi as a foundational reference. LDS members typically believe the book to be a literal historical record.

Although some earlier unpublished studies had been prepared, not until the early 1970s was true textual criticism applied to the Book of Mormon. At that time BYU Professor Ellis Rasmussen and his associates were asked by the LDS Church to begin preparation for a new edition of the Holy Scriptures. One aspect of that effort entailed digitizing the text and preparing appropriate footnotes, another aspect required establishing the most dependable text. To that latter end, Stanley R. Larson (a Rasmussen graduate student) set about applying modern text critical standards to the manuscripts and early editions of the Book of Mormon as his thesis project—which he completed in 1974. To that end, Larson carefully examined the Original Manuscript (the one dictated by Jozef Smit to his scribes) and the Printer's Manuscript (the copy Oliver Kovderi prepared for the Printer in 1829–1830), and compared them with the 1st, 2nd, and 3rd editions of the Book of Mormon to determine what sort of changes had occurred over time and to make judgments as to which readings were the most original.^[71] Larson proceeded to publish a useful set of well-argued articles on the phenomena which he had discovered.^[72] Many of his observations were included as improvements in the 1981 LDS edition of the Book of Mormon.

By 1979, with the establishment of the Qadimgi tadqiqotlar va mormonshunoslik uchun asos (Xo’jaliklar ) as a California non-profit research institution, an effort led by Robert F. Smit began to take full account of Larson's work and to publish a Critical Text of the Book of Mormon. Thus was born the FARMS Critical Text Project which published the first volume of the 3-volume Book of Mormon Critical Text in 1984. The third volume of that first edition was published in 1987, but was already being superseded by a second, revised edition of the entire work,^[73] greatly aided through the advice and assistance of then Yale doctoral candidate Hardy ber, Dr. Gordon C. Thomasson, Professor John W. Welch (the head of FARMS), Professor Qirol Skousen, and others too numerous to mention here. However, these were merely preliminary steps to a far more exacting and all-encompassing project.

In 1988, with that preliminary phase of the project completed, Professor Skousen took over as editor and head of the FARMS Critical Text of the Book of Mormon Project and proceeded to gather still scattered fragments of the Original Manuscript of the Book of Mormon and to have advanced photographic techniques applied to obtain fine readings from otherwise unreadable pages and fragments. He also closely examined the Printer's Manuscript (owned by the Masihning hamjamiyati —RLDS Church in Independence, Missouri) for differences in types of ink or pencil, in order to determine when and by whom they were made. He also collated the various editions of the Book of Mormon down to the present to see what sorts of changes have been made through time.

Thus far, Professor Skousen has published complete transcripts of the Original and Printer's Manuscripts,^[74] as well as a six-volume analysis of textual variants.^[75] Still in preparation are a history of the text, and a complete electronic collation of editions and manuscripts (volumes 3 and 5 of the Project, respectively). Yale University has in the meantime published an edition of the Book of Mormon which incorporates all aspects of Skousen's research.^[76]

Ibroniycha Injil

11th-century manuscript of the Hebrew Bible with Targum

Dan sahifa Halep kodeksi, Deuteronomy.

Textual criticism of the Hebrew Bible compares qo'lyozmasi versions of the following sources (dates refer to the oldest extant manuscripts in each family):

As in the New Testament, changes, corruptions, and erasures have been found, particularly in the Masoretic texts. This is ascribed to the fact that early soferim (scribes) did not treat copy errors in the same manner later on.^[77]

There are three separate new editions of the Hebrew Bible currently in development: Biblia Hebraica Quinta, Hebrew University Bible, va Oksford ibroniycha Injili. Biblia Hebraica Quinta a diplomatik edition based on the Leningrad kodeksi. The Hebrew University Bible is also diplomatic, but based on the Halep kodeksi. The Oksford ibroniycha Injili is an eclectic edition.^[78]

Yangi Ahd

Erta Yangi Ahd texts include more than 5,800 Yunoncha qo'lyozmalar, 10000 Lotin manuscripts and 9,300 manuscripts in various other ancient languages (including Suriyalik, Slavic, Efiopiya va Arman ). The manuscripts contain approximately 300,000 textual variants, most of them involving changes of word order and other comparative trivialities.^{[79][80][tekshirish uchun kotirovka kerak ]} Thus, for over 250 years, New Testament scholars have argued that no textual variant affects any doctrine. Professor D. A. Karson states: "nothing we believe to be doctrinally true, and nothing we are commanded to do, is in any way jeopardized by the variants. This is true for any textual tradition. The interpretation of individual passages may well be called in question; but never is a doctrine affected."^[79][81]

The sheer number of witnesses presents unique difficulties, chiefly in that it makes stemmatics in many cases impossible, because many writers used two or more different manuscripts as sources. Binobarin, Yangi Ahdning matn tanqidchilari qabul qildilar eklektizm after sorting the witnesses into three major groups, called text-types. 2017 yildan boshlab^[yangilash] the most common division distinguishes:

Qur'on

San'adagi qo'lyozmalar ning Qur'on. Endryu Rippin has stated that the discovery of Sana'a manuscript is significant, and its variant readings suggest that the early Quranic text was less stable than previously claimed.^[82]

Textual criticism of the Quran is a beginning area of study,^[83][84] as Muslims have historically disapproved of yuqori tanqid being applied to the Quran.^[85] In some countries textual criticism can be seen as apostasy.^[86]

Muslims consider the original Arabic text to be the final revelation, revealed to Muhammad from AD 610 to his death in 632. In Islamic tradition, the Quran was memorised and written down by Muhammad's companions and copied as needed.

The Quran is believed to have had some oral tradition of passing down at some point. Differences that affected the meaning were noted, and around AD 650 Usmon began a process of standardization, presumably to rid the Quran of these differences. Uthman's standardization did not completely eliminate the textual variants.^[87]

In the 1970s, 14,000 fragments of Quran were discovered in the Sanoning ulkan masjidi, the Sana'a manuscripts. About 12,000 fragments belonged to 926 copies of the Quran, the other 2,000 were loose fragments. The oldest known copy of the Quran so far belongs to this collection: it dates to the end of the 7th–8th centuries.

Nemis olimi Gerd R. Puin ko'p yillar davomida ushbu Qur'on parchalarini o'rganmoqda. Uning tadqiqot guruhi qo'lyozmalarning 35000 mikrofilm fotosuratlarini yaratdi, ular u 8-asrning boshlarida yozilgan. Pyuin o'z asarini to'liq nashr etmagan, ammo noan'anaviy oyat tartiblari, kichik matn o'zgarishlari va noyob imlo uslublarini qayd etgan. Shuningdek, u ba'zi pergamentlarning shunday bo'lishini taklif qildi palimpsestlar qayta ishlatilgan. Puinning fikriga ko'ra, bu o'zgaruvchan matnni qat'iyan farqli o'laroq anglatadi.^[82]

In an article in the 1999 Atlantika oyligi,^[82] Gerd Puin is quoted as saying that:

Mening fikrimcha, Qur'on - bu Muhammad davrida ham hammasi tushunilmagan matnlarning kokteyli. Ularning ko'plari hatto Islomning o'zidan yuz yosh katta bo'lishi mumkin. Hatto Islom urf-odatlari ichida juda katta qarama-qarshi ma'lumotlar to'plami, shu jumladan muhim nasroniy substrat mavjud; agar xohlasa, ulardan butun Islomga qarshi tarixni olish mumkin.
The Koran claims for itself that it is "mubeen", or "clear", but if you look at it, you will notice that every fifth sentence or so simply doesn't make sense. Ko'plab musulmonlar va sharqshunoslar sizga boshqacha aytishadi, albatta, lekin haqiqat shundaki, Qur'on matnining beshdan bir qismi shunchaki tushunarsizdir. Aynan shu narsa tarjima bilan bog'liq an'anaviy tashvishlarni keltirib chiqardi. Agar Qur'on tushunarsiz bo'lsa - hatto uni arab tilida ham tushunib bo'lmaydigan bo'lsa - demak u tarjima qilinmaydi. Odamlar bundan qo'rqishadi. Va Qur'on bir necha bor aniq deb da'vo qilgani bilan, aniq emas, hatto arab tilida so'zlashuvchilar ham aytganidek, bu erda ziddiyat bor. Yana bir narsa davom etayotgan bo'lishi mumkin.^[82]

Kanadalik Islom olimi, Endryu Rippin has likewise stated:

The impact of the Yemeni manuscripts is still to be felt. Their variant readings and verse orders are all very significant. Everybody agrees on that. These manuscripts say that the early history of the Koranic text is much more of an open question than many have suspected: the text was less stable, and therefore had less authority, than has always been claimed.^[82]

For these reasons, some scholars, especially those who are associated with the Revizionist Islomshunoslik maktabi, have proposed that the traditional account of Quran's composition needs to be discarded and a new perspective on the Quran is needed. Puin, comparing Quranic studies with Biblical studies, has stated:

So many Muslims have this belief that everything between the two covers of the Koran is just God's unaltered word. They like to quote the textual work that shows that the Bible has a history and did not fall straight out of the sky, but until now the Koran has been out of this discussion. The only way to break through this wall is to prove that the Koran has a history too. The Sana'a fragments will help us to do this.^[82]

In 2015, some of the earliest known Quranic fragments, containing 62 out of 6236 verses of the Quran and dating from between approximately AD 568 and 645, were identified at the University of Birmingham. David Thomas, Professor of Christianity and Islam, commented:

These portions must have been in a form that is very close to the form of the Koran read today, supporting the view that the text has undergone little or no alteration and that it can be dated to a point very close to the time it was believed to be revealed.^[88]

Talmud

Textual criticism of the Talmud has a long pre-history but has become a separate discipline from Talmudic study only recently.^[89] Much of the research is in Hebrew and German language periodicals.^[90]

Klassik matnlar

Textual criticism originated in the classical era and its development in modern times began with classics scholars, in an effort to determine the original content of texts like Aflotun "s Respublika.^[91] There are far fewer witnesses to classical texts than to the Bible, so scholars can use stemmatics and, in some cases, copy text editing. However, unlike the New Testament where the earliest witnesses are within 200 years of the original, the earliest existing manuscripts of most classical texts were written about a millennium after their composition. All things being equal, textual scholars expect that a larger time gap between an original and a manuscript means more changes in the text.

Huquqiy himoya

Scientific and critical editions can be protected by copyright as works of authorship if enough creativity/originality is provided. The mere addition of a word, or substitution of a term with another one believed to be more correct, usually does not achieve such level of originality/creativity. All the notes accounting for the analysis and why and how such changes have been made represent a different work autonomously copyrightable if the other requirements are satisfied. In the European Union critical and scientific editions may be protected also by the relevant neighboring right that protects critical and scientific publications of public domain works as made possible by art. Ning 5 tasi Mualliflik huquqining muddatiga oid ko'rsatma. Not all EU member States have transposed art. 5 into national law.^[92]

Digital textual scholarship

Digital textual criticism is a relatively new branch of textual criticism working with digital tools to establish a critical edition. The development of digital editing tools has allowed editors to transcribe, archive and process documents much faster than before. Some scholars claim digital editing has radically changed the nature of textual criticism; but others believe the editing process has remained fundamentally the same, and digital tools have simply made aspects of it more efficient.^{[iqtibos kerak ]}

Tarix

From its beginnings, digital scholarly editing involved developing a system for displaying both a newly "typeset" text and a history of variations in the text under review. Until about halfway through the first decade of the twenty-first century, digital archives relied almost entirely on manual transcriptions of texts. However, over the course of this decade, image files became much faster and cheaper, and storage space and upload times ceased to be significant issues. The next step in digital scholarly editing was the wholesale introduction of images of historical texts, particularly high-definition images of manuscripts, formerly offered only in samples.^[93]

Usullari

In view of the need to represent historical texts primarily through transcription, and because transcriptions required encoding for every aspect of text that could not be recorded by a single keystroke on the QWERTY keyboard, encoding was invented. Matnni kodlash tashabbusi (TEI) uses encoding for the same purpose, although its particulars were designed for scholarly uses in order to offer some hope that scholarly work on digital texts had a good chance of migrating from aging operating systems and/or digital platforms to new ones, and the hope that standardization would lead to easy interchange of data among different projects.^[93]

Dasturiy ta'minot

Several computer programs and standards exist to support the work of the editors of critical editions. Bunga quyidagilar kiradi

• The Matnni kodlash tashabbusi. The Guidelines of the TEI provide much detailed analysis of the procedures of critical editing, including recommendations about how to mark up a computer file containing a text with critical apparatus. See especially the following chapters of the Guidelines: 10. Manuscript Description, 11. Representation of Primary Sources va 12. Critical Apparatus.
• Juxta is an open-source tool for comparing and collating multiple witnesses to a single textual work. It was designed to aid scholars and editors examine the history of a text from manuscript to print versions. Juxta provides collation for multiple versions of texts that are marked up in plain text or TEI/XML format.
• The EDMAC macro package for Plain TeX is a set of macros originally developed by John Lavagnino and Dominik Wujastyk for typesetting critical editions. "EDMAC" stands for "EDition" "MACros." EDMAC is in parvarishlash rejimi.
• The ledmac package is a development of EDMAC by Peter R. Wilson for typesetting critical editions with LaTeX. ledmac ichida parvarishlash rejimi.^[94]
• The eledmac package is a further development of ledmac by Maïeul Rouquette that adds more sophisticated features and solves more advanced problems. eledmac was forked from ledmac when it became clear that it needed to develop in ways that would compromise orqaga qarab muvofiqligi. eledmac bu parvarishlash rejimi.
• The reledmac package is a further development of eledmac by Maïeul Rouquette that rewrittes many part of the code in order to allow more robust developments in the future. In 2015, it is in active development.
• ednotes, written by Christian Tapp and Uwe Lück is another package for typesetting critical editions using LaTeX.
• Classical Text Editor is a word-processor for critical editions, commentaries and parallel texts written by Stefan Hagel. CTE is designed for use on the Windows operating system, but has been successfully run on Linux and OS/X using Vino. CTE can export files in TEI format. CTE is currently (2014) in active development.
• Critical Edition Typesetter by Bernt Karasch is a system for typesetting critical editions starting from input into a word-processor, and ending up with typesetting with TeX va EDMAC. Development opf CET seems to have stopped in 2004.

Tanqidiy nashrlar

Mormon kitobi

• Book of Mormon Critical Text – FARMS 2nd edition

Ibroniycha Muqaddas Kitob va Eski Ahd

• Complutensian polyglot (based on now-lost manuscripts)
• Septuaginta  – Rahlfs' 2-nashr
• Gottingen Septuagint (Vetus Testamentum Graecum: Auctoritate Academiae Scientiarum Gottingensis editum): in progress
• Biblia Hebraica Shtutgartensiya – 4th edition
• Ibroniycha Injil: Muhim nashr – an ongoing product which is designed to be different from Biblia Hebraica by producing an eclectic text

Yangi Ahd

• Editio octava critica maior – Tischendorf edition
• Ko'pchilik matniga ko'ra yunoncha Yangi Ahd – Hodges & Farstad edition
• Asl yunon tilida Yangi Ahd – Westcott & Hort edition
• Novum Testamentum Graece Nestle-Aland 28th edition (NA28)^[95]
• United Bible Society's Greek New Testament UBS 4th edition (UBS4)^[96]
• Novum Testamentum Graece va Latin – Merk edition
• Editio Critica Maior – German Bible Society edition

Critical translations

• Keng Ahd – standardized Nestle-Aland 27 edition^[97]
• O'lik dengiz varaqlari Injil – with textual mapping to Masoretic, Dead Sea Scrolls, and Septuagint variants
• Septuagintaning yangi inglizcha tarjimasi, a critical translation from the completed parts of the Göttingen Septuagint, with the remainder from Rahlf's manual edition

Shuningdek qarang

Umumiy

• Vakolat (matn tanqid)
• O'qishni yoping
• Diplomatiya
• Hermeneutics
• Kaozheng (Chinese textual criticism)
• Qo'lyozmalar ro'yxati
• Paleografiya
• Source criticism

Injil

• Muqaddas Bitikning ikkita taniqli buzilishi haqida tarixiy hisobot
• Muqaddas Kitob versiyasidagi bahs
• Injil nashrida
• Injil qo'lyozmasi
• Yangi Ahd qo'lyozmalarining toifalari
• Yuhanno 21
• Injil sharhlari ro'yxati
• Yangi Ahddagi asosiy matn variantlari ro'yxati
  • Yangi Ahddagi matn variantlari
• Yangi Ahd papiruslari ro'yxati
• Yangi Ahd unials ro'yxati
• Zamonaviy ingliz tilidagi tarjimalariga kiritilmagan Yangi Ahd oyatlari ro'yxati
• Mark 16
• Zamonaviy inglizcha Injil tarjimalari
• Iso va zinodan olingan ayol (Pericope Zinotæ)
• Wiseman gipotezasi, dating the book of Genesis

Izohlar

Adabiyotlar

• Aland, Kurt, Aland, Barbara (1987). Yangi Ahdning matni. Brill. ISBN  90-04-08367-7.CS1 maint: bir nechta ism: mualliflar ro'yxati (havola)
• Aland, Barbara (1994). Yangi Ahdning matn tanqidi, sharh va cherkov tarixi. Peeters Publishers. ISBN  90-390-0105-7.
• Bentem, Jorj, Gosse, Edmund. Edvard Fitsjeraldning she'riy va nasriy yozuvlarining Variorum va aniq nashri, (1902), Doubleday, Page and Co.
• Bowers, Fredson (1964). "XIX asrdagi Amerika mualliflarining ilmiy nashrlari uchun ba'zi printsiplar". Bibliografiya bo'yicha tadqiqotlar. 17: 223–228. Olingan 2006-06-04.
• Bowers, Fredson (1972). "Ko'p vakolat: nusxa ko'chirish-matnning yangi muammolari va tushunchalari". Kutubxona. Beshinchi seriya. XXVII (2): 81–115. doi:10.1093 / kutubxona / s5-XXVII.2.81.
• Bredli, Skulli, Grass barglari: bosilgan she'rlarning matnli variori, (1980), NYU Press, ISBN  0-8147-9444-0
• Konfor, Filipp Uesli (2005). Qo'lyozmalar bilan uchrashish: Yangi Ahd paleografiyasi va matn tanqidiga kirish. B&H nashriyot guruhi. ISBN  0-8054-3145-4.
• Devis, Tom (1977). "CEAA va zamonaviy matn tahriri". Kutubxona. Beshinchi seriya. XXXII (32): 61–74. doi:10.1093 / library / s5-XXXII.1.61.
• Ehrman, Bart D. (2005). Isoni noto'g'ri talqin qilish: Injilni kim va nima uchun o'zgartirganligi haqidagi voqea. Harper Kollinz. ISBN  978-0-06-073817-4.
• Ehrman, Bart D. (2006). Bu kimning so'zi?. Continuum International Publishing Group. ISBN  0-8264-9129-4.
• Gaskell, Filipp (1978). Yozuvchidan o'quvchiga: tahririyat uslubidagi tadqiqotlar. Oksford: Oksford universiteti matbuoti. ISBN  0-19-818171-X.
• Greetham, D. C. (1999). Matn nazariyalari. Oksford [Oksfordshir]: Oksford universiteti matbuoti. ISBN  0-19-811993-3.
• Greg, W. W. (1950). "Matndan nusxa ko'chirish asoslari". Bibliografiya bo'yicha tadqiqotlar. 3: 19–36. Olingan 2006-06-04.
• Habib, Rafi (2005). Adabiy tanqid tarixi: Aflotundan to hozirgi kungacha. Kembrij, MA: Blackwell Pub. ISBN  0-631-23200-1.
• Xartin, Patrik J., Petzer J. H., Manning, Bryus. Matn va talqin: Yangi Ahdning tanqididagi yangi yondashuvlar. (1991), BRILL, ISBN  90-04-09401-6
• Jarvis, Simon, Olimlar va janoblar: Shekspir matni tanqidi va olimlar mehnatining namoyishlari, 1725–1765, Oksford universiteti matbuoti, 1995 yil, ISBN  0-19-818295-3
• Klijn, Albertus Frederik Yoxannes, Yangi Ahdga kirish (1980), p. 14, BRILL, ISBN  90-04-06263-7
• Maas, Pol (1958). Matniy tanqid. Oksford universiteti matbuoti. ISBN  0-19-814318-4.
• Makkarter, Piter Kayl Jr (1986). Matn tanqid qilish: ibroniycha Injil matnini tiklash. Filadelfiya, Pensilvaniya: Fortress Press. ISBN  0-8006-0471-7.
• McGann, Jerome J. (1992). Zamonaviy matn tanqidining tanqidi. Charlottesville: Virjiniya universiteti matbuoti. ISBN  0-8139-1418-3.
• McKerrow, R. B. (1939). Oksford Shekspir uchun prolegomena. Oksford: Clarendon Press.
• Montgomeri, Uilyam Radamantus; Uells, Stenli V.; Teylor, Gari; Jowett, Jon (1997). Uilyam Shekspir: Matn sherigi. Nyu-York: W. W. Norton & Company. ISBN  0-393-31667-X.
• Parker, DC (2008). Yangi Ahdning qo'lyozmalari va ularning matnlariga kirish. Kembrij: Kembrij universiteti matbuoti. ISBN  978-0-521-71989-6.
• fon Reenen, Pieter; Margot van Myulken, nashr. (1996). Stemmatologiya bo'yicha tadqiqotlar. Amsterdam: John Benjamins nashriyot kompaniyasi.
• Rozemann, Filipp (1999). Fuko bilan sxolastik fikrni tushunish. Nyu-York: Sent-Martin matbuoti. p. 73. ISBN  0-312-21713-7.
• Schuh, Randall T. (2000). Biologik sistematik: asoslari va qo'llanilishi. Ithaca, N.Y: Kornell universiteti matbuoti. ISBN  0-8014-3675-3.
• Shillingsburg, Piter (1989). "Matnlarni tanqid qilish usullari va matnlarining ijtimoiy holati to'g'risida so'rov". Bibliografiya bo'yicha tadqiqotlar. 42: 55-78. Arxivlandi asl nusxasi 2013-09-12. Olingan 2006-06-07.
• Tanselle, G. Tomas (1972). "Tahririyat apparati uchun ba'zi printsiplar". Bibliografiya bo'yicha tadqiqotlar. 25: 41–88. Olingan 2006-06-04.
• Tanselle, G. Tomas (1975). "Gregning nusxa ko'chirish-matn nazariyasi va Amerika adabiyotini tahrirlash". Bibliografiya bo'yicha tadqiqotlar. 28: 167–230. Olingan 2006-06-04.
• Tanselle, G. Tomas (1976). "Oxirgi mualliflik niyatining muharrirlik muammosi". Bibliografiya bo'yicha tadqiqotlar. 29: 167–211. Olingan 2006-06-04.
• Tanselle, G. Tomas (1981). "So'nggi tahririyat muhokamasi va tahrirlashning asosiy savollari". Bibliografiya bo'yicha tadqiqotlar. 34: 23–65. Olingan 2007-09-07.
• Tanselle, G. Tomas (1986). "Tarixiylik va tanqidiy tahrir". Bibliografiya bo'yicha tadqiqotlar. 39: 1–46. Olingan 2006-06-04.
• Tanselle, G. Tomas (1995). "Ilmiy tahrirlash turlari". D. C. Greetham (tahr.) Da. Ilmiy tahrir: tadqiqot uchun qo'llanma. Nyu-York: Amerikaning zamonaviy tillar assotsiatsiyasi.
• Tenney, Merrill C. (1985). Dunnett, Valter M. (tahrir). Yangi Ahd bo'yicha so'rovnoma. Grand Rapids, MI: W.B. Eerdmans Pub. Co. ISBN  0-8028-3611-9.
• Tov, Emanuel (2001). Ibroniycha Injilni matnli tanqid qilish. Minneapolis: qal'a. ISBN  90-232-3715-3.
• Van Myulken, Margo; Van Reenen, Pieter Th van. (1996). Stemmatologiya bo'yicha tadqiqotlar. John Benjamins Publishing Co. ISBN  90-272-2153-7.CS1 maint: bir nechta ism: mualliflar ro'yxati (havola)
• Vinsent, Marvin Richardson (1899). Yangi Ahdning Matniy Tanqid Tarixi. Makmillan. Garvard universitetining asl nusxasi. ISBN  0-8370-5641-1.
• Wegner, Pol (2006). Muqaddas Kitobni matnli tanqid qilish bo'yicha talabalar uchun qo'llanma. InterVarsity Press. ISBN  0-8308-2731-5.
• Uilson, N. R. p .; Reynolds, L. (1974). Yozuvchilar va olimlar: yunon va lotin adabiyotlarini etkazish uchun qo'llanma. Oksford: Clarendon Press. p. 186. ISBN  0-19-814371-0.
• Zeller, Xans (1975). "Badiiy matnlarning tanqidiy konstitutsiyasiga yangi yondashuv". Bibliografiya bo'yicha tadqiqotlar. 28: 231-264. Arxivlandi asl nusxasi 2013-09-12. Olingan 2006-06-07.

Qo'shimcha o'qish

Bu qo'shimcha o'qish bo'limda Vikipediya ta'qib qilinmasligi mumkin bo'lgan noo'rin yoki ortiqcha takliflar bo'lishi mumkin ko'rsatmalar. Iltimos, faqat a o'rtacha raqam ning muvozanatli, dolzarb, ishonchliva o'qishga oid muhim takliflar keltirilgan; bilan kamroq ahamiyatli yoki ortiqcha nashrlarni olib tashlash xuddi shu nuqtai nazar tegishli joyda. Tegishli matnlardan foydalanishni o'ylab ko'ring ichki manbalar yoki yaratish alohida bibliografiya maqolasi. (2010 yil avgust) (Ushbu shablon xabarini qanday va qachon olib tashlashni bilib oling)

• Dabney, Robert L. (1871). "Yangi Ahdning yunoncha turli xil o'qishlari", Janubiy Presviterian sharhi, 1871 yil aprel, p. 350-390.
• Epp, Eldon J., Yangi Ahddagi eklektik usul matn tanqidi: echimmi yoki simptommi?, Garvard diniy sharhi, jild. 69, № 3/4 (1976 yil iyul - oktyabr), 211–257 betlar
• Xagen, Kennet, Cherkovlardagi Muqaddas Kitob: Masihiylarning Muqaddas Bitikni qanday talqin qilishlari, Markologiyani ilohiyotshunoslik, 4-jild; Market universiteti matbuoti, 1998 yil, ISBN  0-87462-628-5
• Xodjes, Zeyn S va Farstad, Artur L. Yunoncha Yangi Ahd, ko'pchilikning matniga binoan, apparati bilan, Tomas Nelson; 2-nashr (1985 yil 1-yanvar), ISBN  0-8407-4963-5
• Uy egasi, A. E. (1922). "Fikrni matn tanqidiga tatbiq etish". Klassik uyushma materiallari. 18: 67–84. Olingan 2008-03-08.
• Sevgi, Garold (1993). "III bo'lim". XVII asr Angliyasida skribal nashr. Oksford: Clarendon Press. ISBN  0-19-811219-X.
• Kittel, F. A. (1785). Neue Kritiken über den beruhmten Sprych: Drey sind, Himmelda vafot etdi, der Vater, das Wort, und der heilge Geist, unde drein sind eins. Eine synodalische Vorlesung. Braunshweig, Deutschland: Jon. Chr. Meyer.
• Komoszewski, Soyer va Uolles, (2006), Isoni qayta kashf etish, Kregel nashrlari, 2006 yil, ISBN  978-0-8254-2982-8
• Mettsger & Bart Ehrman, (2005), Yangi Ahdning matni, OUP, ISBN  978-0-19-516122-9
• Shiffman, Lourens H., O'lik dengiz yozuvlarini qaytarib olish: Yahudiylik tarixi, nasroniylikning asoslari, Qumranning yo'qolgan kutubxonasi; Yahudiy nashrlari jamiyati, 1-nashr. 1994 yil, ISBN  0-8276-0530-7
• Soulen, Richard N. va Soulen, R. Kendall, Injil tanqidining qo'llanmasi; Vestminster Jon Noks Press; 3 nashr (2001 yil oktyabr), ISBN  0-664-22314-1

Tashqi havolalar

Umumiy

• Matn tanqidiga nisbatan qo'llaniladigan kladistikaga misol
• Stemma va stemmatika
• Stemmatika va axborot nazariyasi
• Kompyuter yordamida stemmatologiya muammolari va ma'lumotlar to'plamlari
• Yaxshi matnni qidirish: Muqaddas Kitobga qanday qilib xatolar kirib kelgan va ularni tuzatish uchun nima qilish kerak Bibliya arxeologiyasini o'rganish
• Evropa Matnli stipendiyalar jamiyati.
• Matnli stipendiyalar jamiyati.
• Valter Burli, Aristotelis De Anima L.III-dagi sharh Critical Edition Mario Tonelotto tomonidan: 4 xil qo'lyozmalardan tanqidiy nashr namunasi (O'rta asr paleografiyasidan transkripsiyasi).

Injil

• Qo'lyozma taqqoslovchisi - Yangi Ahdning ikki yoki undan ortiq qo'lyozma nashrlarini yonma-yon va birlashtirilgan ko'rinishlarda taqqoslashga imkon beradi (o'xshash farq chiqish)
• Xushxabardagi matn variantlarining batafsil muhokamasi (2000 sahifada 1200 ga yaqin variantni o'z ichiga olgan)
• Yangi Ahd papiruslarining to'liq ro'yxati rasmlarga havola bilan
• Elektron nashr Vizantiya an'analarida Yuhannoga ko'ra Xushxabar
• Yangi Ahd qo'lyozmalari (Yangi Ahddagi 11000 dan ortiq variantlar uchun qo'lyozma dalillari ro'yxati)
• Muqaddas Kitobni o'rganish va Bibliya tanqidiga oid so'nggi zamonaviy kitoblar kutubxonasi
• Yunoniston Yangi Ahdining Onlayn matnli sharhi - Yangi Ahdning 60 dan ortiq qadimiy qo'lyozmalarini matn sharhlari va to'liq tanqidiy apparati bilan transkripsiyasi.
• Herbermann, Charlz, ed. (1913). "Quyi tanqid". Katolik entsiklopediyasi. Nyu-York: Robert Appleton kompaniyasi.