Irq va aql - Race and intelligence - Wikipedia

Munozaralari irq va aql, shuningdek, irqiy chiziqlar bo'yicha razvedkaning genetik farqlari haqidagi da'volar ikkalasida ham paydo bo'ldi ilmiy-ommabop va akademik tadqiqotlar tashkil topganidan beri IQ 20-asrning boshlarida sinovlar. Zamonaviy stipendiyalar poyga kabi ijtimoiy qurilish va aql kelishilgan ta'rifga ega emas; o'lchov sifatida IQ testlarining amal qilish muddati umumiy razvedka o'zi bahsli. Xususan, turli xil irqiy yoki etnik aholi guruhlarining o'rtacha IQ ko'rsatkichlarini ushbu guruhlar orasidagi har qanday da'vo qilingan genetik farqlarga bog'lash mumkinligi to'g'risida ilmiy dalillar mavjud emas.

Qo'shma Shtatlardagi turli xil aholi guruhlari o'rtasidagi IQ ko'rsatkichlarining farqini ko'rsatadigan birinchi testlar Amerika Qo'shma Shtatlari armiyasi ishga yollanganlar Birinchi jahon urushi. 20-asrning 20-yillarida evgenika lobbistlar ushbu natijalar buni ko'rsatdi, deb ta'kidladilar Afroamerikaliklar va ba'zi muhojirlar guruhlari past darajadagi aqlga ega edilar Angliya-sakson oq tanlilar va bu tug'ma biologik farqlarga bog'liq edi; va ular siyosatni oqlash uchun bunday e'tiqodlardan foydalanganlar irqiy ajratish. Biroq, tez orada boshqa tadqiqotlar paydo bo'ldi, ular ushbu xulosalarga qarshi chiqishdi va aksincha, armiya sinovlari atrof-muhit omillari, masalan, ijtimoiy-iqtisodiy va ta'lim uchun etarli darajada nazorat qilinmaganligini ta'kidladilar. qora tanlilar va oq tanlilar o'rtasidagi tengsizlik. Keyinchalik kabi hodisalarni kuzatish Flinn effekti atrof-muhit omillari IQ guruh farqlariga ta'sir ko'rsatadigan usullarni ham ta'kidladilar.

Qarama-qarshilik tarixi

Autodidact va bekor qiluvchi Frederik Duglass (1817-1895) qora tanli intellektual kamsitish afsonalariga qarshi yuqori darajadagi qarshi misol bo'lib xizmat qildi.

Irqlar o'rtasidagi razvedkaning farqlari haqidagi da'volar oqlanish uchun ishlatilgan mustamlakachilik, qullik, irqchilik, ijtimoiy darvinizm va irqiy evgenika. Kabi irqiy mutafakkirlar Artur de Gobino o'zlarining g'oyalarini ishlab chiqishda qora tanlilar oq odamlardan tug'ma darajada pastroq degan gumonga o'ta muhim edi. oq ustunlik. Hatto Ma'rifat kabi mutafakkirlar Tomas Jefferson, qul egasi, qora tanlilar jismoniy va aql-idrok jihatidan oq odamlardan tug'ma darajada pastroq deb ishongan.[1] Shu bilan birga, afroamerikalik dahoning taniqli namunalari bunday autodidakt va bekor qiluvchi Frederik Duglass, kashshof sotsiolog W. E. B. Du Bois va shoir Pol Lourens Dunbar qora tanli intellektual pastlikning keng tarqalgan stereotiplariga yuqori darajadagi qarshi misollar sifatida qaraldi.

Alfred Binet (1857-1911), birinchi razvedka sinovining ixtirochisi

IQni erta sinovdan o'tkazish

Birinchi amaliy razvedka sinovi 1905-1908 yillarda ishlab chiqilgan Alfred Binet bolalarni maktabga joylashtirish uchun Frantsiyada. Binet, uning sinovidan olingan natijalar tug'ma aql-idrokni o'lchash yoki shaxslarni doimiy ravishda etiketlash uchun ishlatilmasligi kerakligi haqida ogohlantirdi.[2] Binetning testi ingliz tiliga tarjima qilingan va 1916 yilda qayta ko'rib chiqilgan Lyuis Terman (test natijalari uchun IQ balini kiritgan) va nom ostida nashr etilgan Stenford-Binet razvedka tarozisi. 1916 yilda Terman meksikalik amerikaliklar, afroamerikaliklar va tub amerikaliklarning aqliy "xiralashishi [irqiy yoki hech bo'lmaganda ular kelib chiqadigan oilaviy aktsiyalarga xos bo'lganga o'xshaydi" deb yozgan.[3]

AQSh armiyasi tomonidan ishlab chiqilgan boshqa testlar to'plamidan foydalanilgan Robert Yerkes Birinchi jahon urushi chaqiriluvchilarini armiya ma'lumotlari asosida taniqli psixologlar va evgeniklar kabi baholash Genri X. Goddard, Garri X. Laughlin va Prinston professori Karl Brigham Evropaning janubiy va sharqiy aholisi mahalliy tug'ilgan amerikaliklarga yoki Shimoliy Shimoliy mamlakatlardan kelgan muhojirlarga qaraganda kamroq aqlli va qora tanli amerikaliklar oq tanli amerikaliklarga qaraganda kam aqlli ekanliklarini yozgan.[4] Natijalar immigratsiyaga qarshi faollar lobbisi, shu jumladan tabiatni muhofaza qilish va nazariyotchisi tomonidan keng e'lon qilindi ilmiy irqchilik Medison Grant deb nomlangan deb hisoblagan Shimoliy poyga ustun bo'lish, ammo immigratsiya xavfi ostida "past nasllar". Uning ta'sirli ishida, Amerika razvedkasini o'rganish, psixolog Karl Brigham "Shimoliy irq" ga tegishli deb hisoblangan mamlakatlarga immigratsiyani cheklab, qattiqroq immigratsiya siyosati to'g'risida bahslashish uchun armiya sinovlari natijalaridan foydalangan.[5]

20-asrning 20-yillarida AQShning ba'zi shtatlari qonun chiqargan evgenik qonunlar, masalan Virjiniya qonunlari 1924 yil irqiy yaxlitlik to'g'risidagi qonun tashkil etgan bir tomchi qoida (ningirqiy poklik ') qonun sifatida. Ko'pgina olimlar qobiliyatlar va axloqiy xususiyatlarni irqiy yoki genetik ajdodlar bilan bog'laydigan evgeniklarning da'volariga salbiy munosabatda bo'lishdi. Ular atrof-muhitning (masalan, ikkinchi til sifatida ingliz tilida gaplashishi) sinov natijalariga qo'shgan hissasiga e'tibor qaratdilar.[6] 1930-yillarning o'rtalariga kelib, AQShda ko'plab psixologlar IQ test natijalarida ekologik va madaniy omillar ustun rol o'ynagan degan fikrni qabul qilishdi. Psixolog Karl Brigham o'zining ilgari aytgan dalillarini rad etdi, chunki u testlar tug'ma aqlning o'lchovi emasligini anglaganini tushuntirdi.

Qo'shma Shtatlarda, xususan, Medison Grantning yozuvlarida ushbu masalani muhokama qilish ta'sir ko'rsatdi Nemis Natsist "shimoliy" lar "master poyga."[7] Amerikalik jamoatchilik kayfiyati nemislarga nisbatan o'zgarganligi sababli, razvedkaning irqiy farqlari haqidagi da'volar tobora muammoli bo'lib chiqa boshladi.[8] Kabi antropologlar Frants Boas, Rut Benedikt va Gen Weltfish aql-idrokning irqiy ierarxiyalari haqidagi da'volarning ilmiy bo'lmaganligini namoyish qilish uchun juda ko'p ish qildi.[9] Shunga qaramay, kuchli evgenika va segregatsiya lobbi asosan to'qimachilik-magnat tomonidan moliyalashtirildi Vikliff Draper razvedka tadqiqotlarini evgenika, ajratish va immigratsiyaga qarshi qonunchilik uchun dalil sifatida ishlatishda davom etdi.[10]

Kashshoflar jamg'armasi va Qo'ng'iroq egri chizig'i

1950-yillarda Amerika janubining degregatsiyasi kuchayganida, qora razvedka haqidagi munozaralar qayta boshlandi. Audrey Shuey, Draper's tomonidan moliyalashtiriladi Kashshoflar jamg'armasi, qora tanli odamlar haqiqatan ham oq tanlilar uchun past aqlga ega bo'lgan degan xulosaga kelib, Yerkesning sinovlarini yangi tahlilini nashr etdi. Ushbu tadqiqot segregatistlar tomonidan qora tanli bolalar ustun oq tanli bolalardan alohida ta'lim olish afzalligi haqida bahslashish uchun ishlatilgan.[11] 1960-yillarda munozara qachon qayta tiklandi Uilyam Shokli qora tanli bolalar tug'ma ravishda oq tanli bolalar singari o'rgana olmaydilar degan qarashni jamoatchilik tomonidan himoya qildi.[12] Artur Jensen shunga o'xshash fikrlarni uning fikrlarida bildirdi Garvard ta'lim sharhi maqola, "IQ va o'quv yutuqlarini qanchalik oshirishimiz mumkin?, "ning qiymatini shubha ostiga qo'ygan kompensatsion ta'lim afroamerikalik bolalar uchun.[13] Uning ta'kidlashicha, bunday holatlarda ta'limning sustligi uy sharoitida stimulyatsiya etishmasligi yoki atrof-muhitning boshqa omillarini emas, balki asosiy genetik sababni aks ettiradi.[14][15]

Paydo bo'lishidan keyin jamoat bahslarining yana bir jonlanishi Qo'ng'iroq egri chizig'i (1994), kitobi Richard Herrnstein va Charlz Myurrey Jensenning umumiy nuqtai nazarini qo'llab-quvvatladi.[16] Herrnstein va Murrayni qo'llab-quvvatlovchi bayonot "Intellekt bo'yicha ilm-fan, "da nashr etilgan The Wall Street Journal 52 imzo bilan. Qo'ng'iroq egri chizig'i "nomli bayonotida tanqidiy javoblarga sabab bo'ldi.Aql-idrok: ma'lum va noma'lum "Amerika psixologik assotsiatsiyasi va bir nechta kitoblarda, shu jumladan Bell Curve munozarasi (1995), Dizayn bo'yicha tengsizlik (1996) va ikkinchi nashri Insonning noto'g'ri o'lchovi (1996) tomonidan Stiven Jey Guld.[17][18]

Guruhlardagi farqlar uchun genetik tushuntirishlarni taklif qilgan ba'zi mualliflar mablag'ni olishdi Kashshoflar jamg'armasi boshchiligidagi J. Filipp Rushton 2012 yilda vafotigacha.[10][17][19][20][21] Artur Jensen 2005 yilda Rushton bilan birgalikda qora tanlilar va oq tanlilar o'rtasidagi o'rtacha IQ o'rtasidagi farq qisman genetika bilan bog'liqligini ta'kidlab, maqolani nashr etdi.[22] kashshoflar fondidan 1,1 million dollar olgan.[23][24] Ga binoan Eshli Montagu, "Kaliforniya universiteti Artur Jensen, yigirma uch marta keltirilgan Qo'ng'iroq egri 'bibliografiya - bu kitobning qora tanlilarning intellektual pastligi bo'yicha asosiy vakolati. "[25]

The Janubiy qashshoqlik huquqi markazi kashshoflar jamg'armasining ro'yxatini a nafrat guruhi, fondning tarixi, irqiy va razvedka tadqiqotlarini moliyalashtirish va u bilan bog'liqliklariga asoslanib irqchi jismoniy shaxslar.[26] Boshqa tadqiqotchilar Kashshoflar fondini targ'ib qilish uchun tanqid qilishdi ilmiy irqchilik, evgenika va oq ustunlik.[10][27][28][29]

Tanqidlari poyga va aql biologik aniqlangan tushunchalar sifatida

Aql, IQ, g va IQ testlari

Aql-idrok tushunchasi va aqlni o'lchash darajasi bahs mavzularidir. Aql-idrokni qanday aniqlash kerakligi to'g'risida yakdillik yo'q; shuningdek, bu bitta raqam bilan mazmunli darajada o'lchanadigan narsa ekanligi hamma tomonidan qabul qilinmagan.[30] Turli xil jamiyatlar turli xil ko'nikmalarni qadrlashi va qo'llab-quvvatlashi, shuning uchun aql-idrok tushunchasi madaniy jihatdan o'zgaruvchan va turli jamiyatlarda bir xil mezon bilan o'lchanib bo'lmaydiganligi tanqidiy takrorlanmoqda.[30] Binobarin, ba'zi tanqidchilar aql va boshqa o'zgaruvchilar o'rtasidagi munosabatlarni taklif qilish mantiqsiz deb ta'kidlaydilar.[31]

IQ testlarining har xil turlari bo'yicha ballar o'rtasidagi bog'liqlik ingliz psixologiga olib keldi Charlz Spirman 1904 yilda u "deb atagan asosiy omil mavjudligini taklif qilishg"yoki"umumiy razvedka ". Shu munosabat bilan"g omil ", Spearman" odamni baland bo'yli bo'lishga o'rgata oladigan darajada yuqori darajaga ega bo'lishga o'rgata olmaydi "deb da'vo qildi.[32] Ushbu fikrning so'nggi tarafdorlari orasida Artur Jensen ham bor, u test ballarining farqlari, ayniqsa, "g" yuklangan deb hisoblangan vazifalarda, test topshiruvchining tug'ma qobiliyatini aks ettiradi.[33] Biroq, bu fikrga "g-load" ni hisobga olganda ham, ta'lim va atrof-muhitdagi o'zgarishlar IQ test natijalarini sezilarli darajada yaxshilashi mumkin bo'lgan bir qator tadqiqotlar qarama-qarshi bo'lgan.[34][35][36]

Boshqa psixometriklar umumiy intellekt omili kabi bir narsa bor yoki yo'qligidan qat'i nazar, testlarda ishlash juda muhim bo'lgan holda, ushbu testlar o'z ichiga olgan vazifalar turlariga ta'sir qilish natijasida olingan bilimlarga bog'liqligini ta'kidladilar. Bu shuni anglatadiki, turli xil hayotiy tajribalar va bilim odatlariga ega bo'lgan shaxslar o'rtasida test ballarini taqqoslash ularning tug'ma potentsiallarini ochib bermaydi.[37]

Musobaqa

Bugungi kunda antropologlarning aksariyati irqni biologik emas, balki ijtimoiy-siyosiy hodisa deb bilishadi,[38][39] katta genetik tadqiqotlar tomonidan qo'llab-quvvatlanadigan ko'rinish.[40][41] Ijtimoiy fanlar va biologiyaning hozirgi kundagi asosiy qarashlari shundan iboratki, irq - ijtimoiy tafovutlar va yuzaki jismoniy xususiyatlar asosida guruhlar tuzadigan xalq mafkuralariga asoslangan ijtimoiy qurilish.[42] Sternberg, Grigorenko va Kidd (2005) davlat, "Irq - bu biologik emas, ijtimoiy qurilgan tushuncha. Bu odamlarni tasniflash istagidan kelib chiqadi."[31] Inson turidagi tabiiy va alohida bo'linishlar sifatida inson "irqlari" tushunchasi ham tomonidan rad etilgan Amerika antropologik assotsiatsiyasi. 1998 yilda qabul qilingan AAA ning rasmiy pozitsiyasi shundan iboratki, ilmiy bilimlardagi yutuqlar "inson populyatsiyalari aniq, aniq chegaralangan, biologik jihatdan alohida guruhlar emasligini" va "biologik populyatsiyalar o'rtasida bo'linish chiziqlarini o'rnatishga qaratilgan har qanday urinish [ ham o'zboshimchalik bilan, ham sub'ektivdir. "[43] Ning so'nggi bayonoti Amerika jismoniy antropologlari assotsiatsiyasi (2019) "Irq odamlarning biologik o'zgarishini aniq namoyish etmaydi. Ilgari bu hech qachon aniq bo'lmagan va zamonaviy inson populyatsiyasiga murojaat qilishda bu noto'g'ri bo'lib qoladi. Odamlar biologik jihatdan alohida kontinental turlarga yoki irqiy genetik klasterlarga bo'linmaydi. "[44]

Inson aql-idrokini o'rganishda irq deyarli har doim genetik xususiyatlarni tahlil qilishdan ko'ra, o'z-o'zidan hisobotlar yordamida aniqlanadi. Psixolog Devid Rouening so'zlariga ko'ra, o'z-o'zini hisobot qilish irqiy farqlarni o'rganishda irqiy tasniflashning afzal usuli hisoblanadi, chunki faqat genetik belgilarga asoslangan tasniflash irqiy guruhlarni ajratib turadigan "madaniy, xulq-atvori, sotsiologik, psixologik va epidemiologik o'zgaruvchilar" ga e'tibor bermaydi.[45] Xant va Karlsonning yozishicha, "Shunga qaramay, o'zlikni identifikatsiyalash - bu genetik tarkib uchun hayratlanarli darajada ishonchli qo'llanma. Tang va boshq. (2005) Amerika Qo'shma Shtatlari va Tayvanda 3600 dan ortiq odam uchun genomik belgilarni saralash uchun matematik klasterlash usullarini to'rt guruhga ajratish. Klasterni topshirish va shaxslarning o'zlarini oq, qora, Sharqiy Osiyo yoki Latino kabi irqiy / etnik identifikatsiya qilish to'g'risidagi hisobotlari o'rtasida deyarli mukammal kelishuv mavjud edi. "[46] Sternberg va Grigorenko Xant va Karlsonning Tangning natijalarini irqiy bo'linishlar biologik degan qarashni qo'llab-quvvatlashi kabi talqin qilishiga qo'shilmaydi; aksincha, "Tang va boshqalarning fikri shundan iborat ediki, qadimgi geografik ajdodlar hozirgi yashash joyiga emas, balki o'zlarini identifikatsiya qilish bilan bog'liq bo'lib, bunday identifikatsiya biologik irqning mavjudligiga dalil emas."[47]

Antropolog C. Loring Brace[48] va genetik Jozef Graves klasterlarni tahlil qilish va o'zini o'zi xabar qilgan irq va genetik ajdodlar o'rtasidagi o'zaro bog'liqlik biologik irqlar tushunchasini qo'llab-quvvatlaydi degan fikrga qo'shilmaydi.[49] Ularning fikriga ko'ra, odatda irqlar deb belgilangan guruhlarga to'g'ri keladigan biologik va genetik o'zgarishni topish mumkin bo'lsa-da, bu deyarli barcha geografik jihatdan ajralib turadigan populyatsiyalar uchun to'g'ri keladi. Genetik ma'lumotlarning klaster tuzilishi tadqiqotchining va faraz qilingan populyatsiyalarning dastlabki farazlariga bog'liq. Biri kontinental guruhlardan namunalar olganda, klasterlar kontinental bo'ladi; agar kimdir boshqa namuna namunalarini tanlagan bo'lsa, klasterlar boshqacha bo'lar edi. Kaplan 2011 yil G'arb ijtimoiy nutqida keng tarqalgan irqiy toifalarga mos keladigan populyatsiyalarni aniqlash uchun, xususan, allel chastotalaridagi farqlardan foydalanish mumkin bo'lsa-da, farqlar har qanday inson populyatsiyalari (masalan, ispan va Portugalcha).

Guruh farqlari

Inson aql-idrokini o'rganish psixologiyaning eng munozarali mavzularidan biri bo'lib, qisman ma'nosi to'g'risida kelishuvga erishish qiyinligi sababli aql va intellektni IQ testlari bilan mazmunli o'lchash mumkin degan taxminlarga e'tirozlar. Hech bo'lmaganda XIX asrga borib taqaladigan irqiy va etnik guruhlar o'rtasida razvedkada tug'ma farqlar borligi haqidagi da'volar ham taxminlar va tadqiqot usullariga tayanib, kamsitish va irqchilik uchun mafkuraviy asos bo'lib xizmat qilgani uchun tanqid qilindi.

2012 yilda aql-idrokning turli tarkibiy qismlari sinovlarini o'tkazgan tadqiqotda Xempshir va boshq. Jensen va Rushtonning irqlar o'rtasidagi IQ farqida irsiy omillar rol o'ynashi kerak degan fikriga qo'shilmasliklarini bildirdi va "razvedka testlari natijalari bo'yicha populyatsiya farqlari irsiy omillar yoki boshqa o'zaro bog'liq demografik o'zgaruvchilar ta'sirida bo'ladimi-yo'qligi noma'lum bo'lib qolmoqda. Ijtimoiy-iqtisodiy holat, ta'lim darajasi va motivatsiyasi sifatida.Manfaatliroq, ularning [razvedka testlari natijalaridagi aholi farqlari] aqlning unitar omiliga aloqadorligi, aksincha, murakkabroq razvedka konstruktsiyasining ayrim tarkibiy qismlariga nisbatan paradigmalarni sinashdagi noaniqlikdan farq qilishi shubhali. . "[50] Jekson va Vaydmanning so'zlariga ko'ra,

Intellektdagi irqiy farqlar uchun genetik dalillar ilmiy jamoatchilikda ko'plab tarafdorlarni yutib chiqmaganligining bir qancha sabablari bor. Birinchidan, Jensen va uning izdoshlari tomonidan qilingan ish, hatto o'z shartlariga binoan, tekshiruvni ushlab turmadi. Ikkinchidan, aholi genetikasining o'sishi aqlning genetik sababi haqidagi da'volarni bekor qildi. Uchinchidan, yangi tushuncha institutsional irqchilik irqlar o'rtasidagi IQ ballaridagi farqlarning mavjudligini yaxshiroq tushuntirib berdi.[51]

Sinov natijalari

AQShda, odatda, o'zlarini osiyolik deb tanishtirgan shaxslar IQ testlarida ispanlardan yuqori ball to'playdigan, afroamerikaliklarga qaraganda ko'proq ball to'playdigan kavkazliklarga qaraganda ko'proq ball olishadi. Shunga qaramay, har bir etnik guruhda IQ ko'rsatkichlari o'rtasidagi farq ularning orasidan farq qiladi.[52] 2001 yil meta-tahlil 6.246.729 ishtirokchining kognitiv qobiliyati yoki qobiliyati uchun sinovdan o'tgan natijalari, qora tanlilar va oq tanlilar o'rtasida o'rtacha ballar farqi 1,1 standart og'ishlar. Kabi kollej va universitetlarga ariza topshirish testlari uchun izchil natijalar topildi Scholastic qobiliyat sinovi (N = 2,4 million) va Bitiruvchilarning rekord imtihonlari (N = 2,3 million), shuningdek korporativ sharoitlarda (N = 0,5 million) va harbiy xizmatda (N = 0,4 million) ish izlovchilarning sinovlari uchun.[53]

1994 yilgi bahsli kitobga javoban Qo'ng'iroq egri chizig'i, Amerika psixologik assotsiatsiyasi (APA) o'n bir mutaxassisdan iborat ishchi guruh tuzdi va u hisobot chiqardi "Aql-idrok: ma'lum va noma'lum "1996 yilda.[54] Guruhlar o'rtasidagi farqlarga nisbatan, hisobotda guruhlar o'rtasidagi farqlar guruhlar o'rtasidagi farqlarga qaraganda ancha kengroq ekanligi va razvedkada etnik farqlar haqidagi da'volar diqqat bilan o'rganib chiqilishi kerakligi haqidagi kelishuv yana bir bor tasdiqlandi, chunki bunday da'volar irqiy kamsitishlarni oqlash uchun ishlatilgan. Hisobotda ishlatilgan irqiy toifalar bilan bog'liq muammolar ham tan olingan, chunki bu toifalar doimiy ravishda qo'llanilmaydi va bir hil emas (shuningdek qarang.) Qo'shma Shtatlarda irq va etnik kelib chiqishi ).[54]

Buyuk Britaniyada ba'zi Afrika guruhlari o'rtacha aholi ma'lumotlariga qaraganda o'rtacha ma'lumot darajasi va test sinovlari natijalariga ko'ra yuqori.[55]2010-2011 yillarda ingliz oq tanli o'quvchilar 5 A * -C darajaga ega bo'lish ehtimoli 2,3 foizga kam edi GCSE o'rtacha milliy ko'rsatkichga nisbatan, ehtimol bu o'rtacha 21,8% dan yuqori Nigeriyalik kelib chiqishi, ular uchun o'rtacha 5,5% dan yuqori Ganalik kelib chiqishi va ular uchun o'rtacha 1,4% dan yuqori Serra Leonian kelib chiqishi. Ma'lumotlar mavjud bo'lgan boshqa ikki afrikalik etnik guruh uchun bu ehtimol o'rtacha 23,7% ga nisbatan o'rtacha bo'lgan Somali kelib chiqishi va ular uchun o'rtacha 35,3% dan past Kongo kelib chiqishi. (Bangladesh va Hindiston kelib chiqishi ehtimoli o'rtacha 1,8% va 29,9%, Pokiston va Afg'oniston kelib chiqishi o'rtacha 8,6% va 25%).)[56] 2014 yilda 11 ta til guruhining qora-afrikalik o'quvchilari o'tish ehtimoli ko'proq edi 2-bosqich Matematikalar o'rtacha Angliyada o'rtacha 4+. Umuman olganda, oq tanli inglizlar uchun o'rtacha o'tish darajasi 86,5% (N = 395,787), qora afrikaliklar uchun 85,6% (N = 18,497). Shunga qaramay, bir nechta qora-afrikalik til guruhlari, shu jumladan Yoruba, Igbo, Hausa, Akan, Ga, Suaxili, Edo, Qo'y, Amharcha ma'ruzachilar va ingliz tilida so'zlashuvchi afrikaliklarning har biri o'rtacha ingliz tilidagi o'rtacha ko'rsatkichdan yuqori (jami N = 9,314), Hausa, Igbo, Yoruba va Amhara o'rtacha 90% dan yuqori (N = 2,071).[57] 2017-2018 yillarda o'quvchilarning ingliz tili va matematikadan GCSE (yilda 4-bosqich ) oq tanlilar uchun 42,7% (N = 396,680) va qora-afrikaliklar uchun 44,3% (N = 18,358).[58]

Flinn effekti va yopilish oralig'i

20-asr davomida IQ testlarida xom ballar ko'tarilib bormoqda; ushbu bal o'sishi "Flinn effekti" nomi bilan mashhur Jeyms R. Flinn. Qo'shma Shtatlarda o'sish doimiy ravishda va taxminan chiziqli bo'lib, sinovlarning dastlabki yillaridan taxminan 1998 yilgacha yutuqlar to'xtagan va ba'zi testlar hatto test natijalari pasayib ketgan. Masalan, 1995 yilda ba'zi IQ testlarida qora tanlilarning o'rtacha ballari 1945 yildagi oq tanlilar bilan bir xil edi.[59] Bir juft akademik buni ta'kidlaganidek, "bugungi kunda odatdagi afroamerikalik odatda IQ darajasi o'rtacha oq tanli amerikalikning bobo-buvilaridan bir oz yuqori".[60]

Flinnning ta'kidlashicha, ushbu o'zgarishlar bir avlod va ikkinchi avlod o'rtasida sodir bo'lganligini hisobga olib, ortib borayotgan ballarni genetik omillar hisobga olishi ehtimoldan yiroq emas, keyinchalik atrof-muhit omillari sabab bo'lishi kerak edi. Flinn effektining qora / oq IQ bo'shliq sabablari haqidagi munozarada ahamiyati atrof-muhit omillari sinovlar natijalarining 1 standart og'ish miqyosida o'zgarishini keltirib chiqarishi mumkinligidadir. Bunga oldinroq shubha qilingan edi.

Flinn effektidan alohida hodisa shundaki, 20-asrning so'nggi o'n yilliklarida IQ bo'shliqning asta-sekin kamayib borishi aniqlandi, chunki qora tanli imtihon topshiruvchilar oq sinovchilarga nisbatan o'rtacha ballarini oshirdilar. Masalan, Vinsent 1991 yilda bolalar o'rtasida IQ oq-qora farq kamayayotgani, ammo kattalar orasida doimiy bo'lib qolayotgani haqida xabar bergan.[61] Xuddi shunday, Dickens va Flynn tomonidan 2006 yilda o'tkazilgan bir tadqiqotda 1972-2002 yillarda qora tanli va oq tanli odamlarning o'rtacha ball ko'rsatkichlari o'rtasidagi farq 5 yoki 6 IQ ball bilan yopilganligi,[35] taxminan uchdan biriga qisqartirish. Xuddi shu davrda ta'limdagi yutuqlarning farqi ham kamaydi.[62] Flinn va Dikkensning sharhlari,[35] Makintosh,[63] va Nisbett va boshq. bo'shliqning asta-sekin yopilishini fakt sifatida qabul qiling.[64]

IQ guruhidagi farqlarga atrof-muhitning ta'siri

Sog'liqni saqlash va ovqatlanish

Qonda qo'rg'oshin darajasi bo'lgan 1-5 yoshdagi bolalarning ulushi kamida 10 µg / dL. Qora va ispan bolalarining darajasi oq tanli bolalarga qaraganda ancha yuqori. 24 oy davomida qon qo'rg'oshinining 10 mg / dL ko'payishi IQ ning 5,8 punktga pasayishi bilan bog'liq.[65] Garchi geometrik qonning qo'rg'oshin darajasi (GM BLL) pasayib borayotgan bo'lsa-da, CDC hisobotida (2002) shunday deyilgan: "Biroq, qora tanli ispanlar bo'lmagan bolalar uchun GM BLL Meksikalik-Amerikaliklar va ispansiz oq tanli bolalarnikidan yuqori bo'lib qolmoqda, ta'sir qilish xavfi farqlari hali ham saqlanib kelayotganligini ko'rsatmoqda. "[66]

Atrof-muhit omillari, shu jumladan bolalik qo'rg'oshin ta'sir qilish,[65] ning past stavkalari emizish,[67] va kambag'al oziqlanish[68][69] kognitiv rivojlanish va ishlashga sezilarli ta'sir ko'rsatishi mumkin. Masalan, qo'rg'oshin bolaligiga ta'sir qilish, kambag'al joylardagi uylar bilan bog'liq[70] IQ o'rtacha 7 ballga pasayishiga olib keladi,[71] va yod tanqisligi pasayishiga olib keladi o'rtacha 12 IQ ball.[72][73] Bunday buzilishlar ba'zida doimiy bo'lishi mumkin, ba'zan qisman yoki to'liq o'sish bilan qoplanishi mumkin. Hayotning dastlabki ikki yilida to'yib ovqatlanmaslikning o'ta muhim davri bo'lib, uning oqibatlari ko'pincha qaytarib bo'lmaydigan bo'lib, ularda kognitiv rivojlanish, o'qish qobiliyati va kelajakdagi iqtisodiy samaradorlik kiradi.[74] Qo'shma Shtatlarning afroamerikalik aholisi statistik jihatdan kambag'al mahallalar, maktablar, ovqatlanish, tug'ruqdan oldin va tug'ruqdan keyingi sog'liqni saqlash kabi ko'plab zararli ekologik omillarga duchor bo'lish ehtimoli ko'proq.[75][76] Makkintosh ta'kidlashicha, amerikalik qora tanlilar uchun bolalar o'limi oq tanlilarga qaraganda ikki baravar ko'p, tug'ilishning past vazni esa ikki baravar ko'p. Shu bilan birga, oq tanli onalar o'zlarining chaqaloqlarini emizish ehtimoli ikki baravar yuqori, va emizish kam vaznli bolalar uchun IQ bilan juda bog'liqdir. Shu tarzda, IQga ta'sir qiladigan ko'plab sog'liqqa bog'liq omillar ikki guruh o'rtasida tengsiz taqsimlanadi.[77]

The Kopengagen konsensusi 2004 yilda yod va temir moddalarining etishmasligi miya rivojlanishining buzilishiga ta'sir qilganligini va bu juda ko'p odamlarga ta'sir qilishi mumkinligini aytdi: taxminlarga ko'ra butun dunyo aholisining uchdan bir qismi ta'sir qiladi yod tanqisligi. Rivojlanayotgan mamlakatlarda to'rt yoshgacha va undan kichik yoshdagi bolalarning 40% azob chekishi taxmin qilinmoqda anemiya ularning dietasida temir etarli emasligi sababli.[78]

Boshqa olimlarning fikriga ko'ra, oddiygina ovqatlanish standarti aholining aql-idrokiga sezilarli ta'sir ko'rsatadi va Flinn ta'siri butun dunyo bo'ylab ovqatlanish standartlarining oshishi bilan bog'liq bo'lishi mumkin.[79] Jeyms Flinnning o'zi bu fikrga qarshi chiqdi.[80]

Yaqinda o'tkazilgan ba'zi bir tadqiqotlar miyaning rivojlanishidagi sekinlashuvni keltirib chiqardi yuqumli kasalliklar, ularning aksariyati oq tanli bo'lmagan populyatsiyada ko'proq tarqalgan bo'lib, dunyoning turli mintaqalari o'rtasidagi IQ farqlarini tushuntirishda muhim omil bo'lishi mumkin.[81] Ushbu tadqiqot natijalari IQ, irq va yuqumli kasalliklar o'rtasidagi o'zaro bog'liqlikni ko'rsatib, AQShdagi IQ bo'shliqqa ham tegishli ekanligini ko'rsatdi va bu muhim ekologik omil bo'lishi mumkinligini ko'rsatdi.[82] Shuningdek, "Flinn effekti qisman yuqumli kasalliklar intensivligining pasayishi tufayli yuzaga kelishi mumkin" degan taxminlar mavjud.[83]

Jahon sog'liqni saqlash tashkiloti tomonidan 2013 yilda o'tkazilgan meta-tahlil natijalariga ko'ra, onalarning IQ darajasini nazorat qilgandan so'ng, ko'krak suti bilan boqish IQ darajasi 2.19 ball bilan bog'liq bo'lgan. Mualliflar ushbu munosabatlar sababchi ekanligini ta'kidlaydilar, ammo ushbu yutuqning amaliy ahamiyati munozarali ekanligini ta'kidlaydilar; ammo, ular Braziliyada ko'krak suti bilan boqish va akademik ko'rsatkichlar o'rtasidagi bog'liqlikni taklif qiladigan bitta tadqiqotni ta'kidladilar, bu erda "emizish davomiyligi ijtimoiy-iqtisodiy mavqei bo'yicha sezilarli o'zgaruvchanlikni keltirib chiqarmaydi".[84] Colen and Ramey (2014) shunga o'xshash tarzda, birodarlarni oilalar o'rtasida emas, balki oilalarda taqqoslashni nazorat qilish, emizish holati va WISC IQ ko'rsatkichlari o'rtasidagi o'zaro bog'liqlikni qariyb uchdan bir qismga kamaytiradi, ammo bundan keyin emizish davomiyligi va WISC IQ ko'rsatkichlari o'rtasidagi bog'liqlikni topadi. ahamiyatsiz. Ularning ta'kidlashicha, "odatda, emizish bilan bog'liq bo'lgan uzoq muddatli foydali ta'sirlarning aksariyati, birinchi navbatda, irqiy va ijtimoiy-iqtisodiy holat kabi asosiy demografik xususiyatlar bo'yicha chaqaloqlarni oziqlantirish amaliyotiga bo'lgan bosim bosimiga bog'liq bo'lishi mumkin".[85] Reyxmanning fikriga ko'ra, qora-oq IQ bo'shliqlarining 3-4 foizidan ko'prog'i, tug'ilishning past vaznidagi qora-oq rangdagi farqlar bilan izohlanishi mumkin.[86]

Ta'lim

Bir nechta tadqiqotlar shuni ko'rsatdiki, bo'shliqning katta qismi ta'lim sifatidagi farqlarga bog'liq bo'lishi mumkin.[87] Irqiy kamsitish ta'limda irqlar o'rtasidagi ta'lim sifatidagi farqlarning mumkin bo'lgan sabablaridan biri sifatida taklif qilingan.[88] Xala Elxoveris, Kagendo Mutua, Negmeldin Alsheyx va Pauline Holloueyning maqolalariga ko'ra, o'qituvchilarning talabalar ishtirok etishlari uchun yuborgan qarorlari. iqtidorli va iste'dodli o'quv dasturlariga qisman talabalarning millati ta'sir ko'rsatdi.[89]

The Abekediyalik erta aralashuv loyihasi intensiv erta bolalik ta'limi loyihasi, shuningdek, u ishtirok etgan qora tanli bolalarda nazorat qilish bilan taqqoslaganda 21 yoshida o'rtacha IQ 4.4 ballni oshirishga muvaffaq bo'ldi.[67] Artur Jensen Abekedariya loyihasi ta'lim IQga sezilarli ta'sir ko'rsatishi mumkinligini namoyish qildi, ammo shu bilan birga uning fikri shu paytgacha bironta ta'lim dasturi qora-oq IQ bo'shliqni uchdan bir qismiga kamaytira olmadi va ta'limdagi farqlar shuning uchun uning yagona sababi bo'lishi ehtimoldan yiroq emas.[90]

Tomonidan bir qator tadqiqotlar Jozef Fagan va Sintiya Xolland IQ testlarida qo'yilgan kognitiv vazifalarning oldingi ta'sirining test natijalariga ta'sirini o'lchashdi. IQ bo'shligi odatda afro-amerikalik test topshiruvchilar orasida IQ testlarida uchraydigan kognitiv funktsiyalardan foydalangan holda topshiriqlarning past darajada ta'sirlanishining natijasi deb hisoblasak, ular IQ testini topshirishdan oldin ushbu turdagi vazifalarda afroamerikaliklar guruhini tayyorladilar. Tadqiqotchilar afroamerikaliklar va oq tanli imtihon topshiruvchilar o'rtasida ishlashda keyingi farq yo'qligini aniqladilar.[91][92] Deyli va Onvuegbuzi xulosasiga ko'ra, Fagan va Golland "sinovdan o'tkaziladigan ma'lumotlarga ta'sir qilish uchun teng imkoniyat yaratilganda, qora tanli odamlar va oq tanlilar o'rtasidagi razvedkaning test topshiriqlari bo'yicha bilimlaridagi farqlar o'chirilishi mumkin".[93] Shunga o'xshash dalil Devid Marks IQ tafovutlari savodxonlikdagi farqlar bilan yaxshi bog'liq, degan fikrni bildiradiki, ta'lim orqali savodxonlik ko'nikmalarini rivojlantirish IQ testlarining samaradorligini oshirishga olib keladi.[94][95]

2003 yilda olib borilgan tadqiqotlar shuni ko'rsatdiki, ikkita o'zgaruvchan narsa - stereotip tahdidi va bolalarning otalarining ta'lim darajasi - bilim qobiliyati testidagi ballarning oq-qora ranglarini qisman tushuntirib, ularning o'zgarmas genetik omillardan kelib chiqadigan irsiy qarashlarini buzdi.[96]

Ijtimoiy-iqtisodiy muhit

Bolalar tarbiyalanadigan ijtimoiy-iqtisodiy muhitning turli jihatlari IQ bo'shliqlarining bir qismi bilan o'zaro bog'liqligi isbotlangan, ammo ular bu bo'shliqni hisobga olmaydilar.[97] 2006 yilgi sharhga ko'ra, ushbu omillar bitta standart og'ishning yarmidan ozini tashkil qiladi.[98]

Boshqa tadqiqotlar past ijtimoiy-iqtisodiy ahvol (SES) va yuqori SES guruhlari o'zgaruvchanligining turli sabablariga qaratilgan.[99][100][101]AQShda past SES guruhlari orasida yuqori SES populyatsiyalariga qaraganda IQdagi farqning kichik qismi genetik farqlarga to'g'ri keladi.[102] Bunday effektlarni bioekologik gipoteza - genotiplar fenotiplarga aylanib, atrof muhitning sinergetik ta'siridan kelib chiqadi.[103] Nisbett va boshq. (2012a) yuqori darajadagi SES shaxslari o'zlarining to'liq biologik potentsiallarini rivojlantirishga qodir bo'lishlarini taklif qilishadi, ammo past darajadagi SES shaxslari ularning rivojlanishiga salbiy atrof-muhit sharoitlari to'sqinlik qilishi mumkin. Xuddi shu sharhda ta'kidlanishicha, farzand asrab olish bo'yicha tadqiqotlar odatda faqat o'rta va yuqori o'rta SES farzand asrab oluvchi oilalarni o'z ichiga olishga qaratilgan bo'lib, ular o'rtacha genetik ta'sirni yuqori baholashga moyil bo'lishadi. Shuningdek, ular ta'kidlashlaricha, quyi sinfdagi uylardan o'rta sinf uylariga farzand asrab olish bo'yicha o'tkazilgan tadqiqotlar shuni ko'rsatdiki, bunday bolalar IESda past SES uylarida qolgan bolalarga nisbatan 12 dan 18 ballgacha o'sadi.[104] 2015 yilda o'tkazilgan tadqiqotlar shuni ko'rsatdiki, atrof-muhit omillari (ya'ni, oila daromadi, onalik ta'limi, onaning og'zaki qobiliyati / bilimlari, uydagi o'quv materiallari, ota-ona omillari, bola tug'ilishi tartibi va tug'ilish vazni) kognitiv qobiliyatdagi oq-qora bo'shliqni tashkil etadi. test natijalari.[105]

Sinovning noto'g'ri tomoni

Bir qator tadqiqotlar IQ testlari ayrim guruhlarga qarshi bo'lishi mumkin degan xulosaga kelishdi.[106][107][108][109] Qo'shma Shtatlar va Evropadan tashqarida olingan IQ ballarining haqiqiyligi va ishonchliligi, qisman madaniyatlar o'rtasidagi IQ ballarini taqqoslashning o'ziga xos qiyinligi sababli shubha ostiga qo'yildi.[110][111] Bir nechta tadqiqotchilar madaniy farqlar sanoat bo'lmagan jamoalarda standart IQ testlarining maqsadga muvofiqligini cheklashini ta'kidladilar.[112][113]

Tomonidan 1996 yilgi hisobot Amerika psixologik assotsiatsiyasi madaniyatlar bo'yicha aqlni taqqoslash qiyin bo'lishi va test materiallari bilan har xil tanishish test natijalarida sezilarli farqlarni keltirib chiqarishi mumkinligini ta'kidlaydi; Shuningdek, testlar qora tanli amerikaliklar uchun kelajakdagi yutuqlarni aniq bashorat qiluvchi va shu ma'noda xolis ekanligi aytiladi.[54] Sinovlar kelajakdagi ta'lim darajasini aniq bashorat qiladigan nuqtai nazar bilan mustahkamlanadi Nikolas Makintosh uning 1998 yilgi kitobida IQ va inson intellekti,[114] va 1999 yilgi adabiyotlar tahlili tomonidan Brown, Reynolds & Whitaker (1999).

Jeyms R. Flinn ushbu mavzu bo'yicha o'tkazilgan tadqiqotlarni o'rganib chiqib, ko'plab test savollarining vazni va mavjudligi madaniy jihatdan qanday ma'lumotlarga va fikrlash uslublariga bog'liqligiga bog'liqligini ta'kidladi.[115]

Jurnaldagi 2008 yilgi maqolaga ko'ra Aql,[a] so'rov natijalariga ko'ra aql-idrokni o'lchash sohasidagi tadqiqotchilarning aksariyati IQ testlari irqiy yoki madaniy jihatdan bir tomonlama ekanligi haqidagi da'vo uchun ishonchli dalillar mavjudligiga ishonmaydi.[119] Ushbu topilma 2003 yilgi tadqiqot natijalariga o'xshaydi.[120]

Stereotip tahdid va ozchilikning holati

Stereotip tahdid insonning xatti-harakati mavjudligini tasdiqlashidan qo'rqishdir stereotip kim tomonidan aniqlangan yoki qaysi biri tomonidan aniqlangan guruhning; bu qo'rquv o'z navbatida ishlashning pasayishiga olib kelishi mumkin.[121] Aql-idrokni o'lchash faktini ko'rsatadigan sinov vaziyatlari irqiy-etnik guruhlardan o'rtacha ballni pastroq bo'lgan yoki undan past ball kutayotgan shaxslarning ballarini pasayishiga olib keladi. Stereotip tahdid sharoitlari guruhlar o'rtasida IQ kutilganidan kattaroq farqlarni keltirib chiqaradi.[122] Psixometriya mutaxassisi Nikolas Makintosh Stereotip tahdidining ta'siri qora tanli va oq tanli odamlar o'rtasidagi IQ farqiga hissa qo'shishiga shubha yo'q deb hisoblaydi.[123]

Ko'p sonli tadqiqotlar shuni ko'rsatdiki, Amerika Qo'shma Shtatlaridagi afroamerikalik ozchilik singari tizimli ravishda kam ta'minlangan ozchiliklar, odatda, ta'lim tizimida va razvedka testlarida ko'pchilik guruhlari yoki immigrantlar yoki "ixtiyoriy" ozchiliklar kabi kam ta'minlangan ozchiliklarga qaraganda yomonroq ishlashadi. .[54] Ushbu topilmalarning izohi shundan iborat bo'lishi mumkinki, kastga o'xshash ozchiliklarning bolalari, ijtimoiy rivojlanish istiqbollarining tizimli cheklovlari tufayli, "harakat optimizm ", ya'ni ular IQ testlari bilan o'lchangan ko'nikmalarni singari ko'pchilik jamiyat tomonidan qadrlanadigan ko'nikmalarni egallash maqsadga muvofiqdir degan ishonchga ega emaslar. Ular hattoki" ba'zi bir xatti-harakatlarni ataylab rad etishlari mumkin "oq rangda harakat qilish."[54][124][125] 1997 yilda nashr etilgan tadqiqotlar shuni ko'rsatadiki, kognitiv qobiliyatlar testidagi ballar oq-qora bo'shliqning bir qismi test motivatsiyasidagi irqiy farqlarga bog'liq.[126]

Ba'zi tadqiqotchilar stereotip tahdidni real hayotdagi bo'shliqlarning omili sifatida talqin qilmaslik kerakligini taklif qilishdi va bu ehtimolni ko'tarishdi. nashr tarafkashligi.[127][128][129] Boshqa tanqidchilar, dastlabki tadqiqotlarning katta ta'sir ko'rsatadigan noto'g'ri tushunchalari deb da'vo qilayotgan narsalarni tuzatishga e'tibor berishdi.[130] Biroq, juda ko'p meta-tahlillar va muntazam tahlillar stereotip tahdidining ta'siri uchun muhim dalillarni ko'rsatdi, ammo bu hodisa haddan tashqari soddalashtirilgan xarakteristikaga qarshi turadi.[131][132][133][134][135][136][137] Masalan, bitta meta-tahlil shuni ko'rsatdiki, ayol sub'ektlar bilan "tahdidni faollashtiruvchi ko'rsatmalar eng katta ta'sirni, so'ngra ochiq va mo''tadil belgilarni keltirib chiqaradi", ozchiliklar bilan "o'rtacha aniq stereotip tahdidni faollashtiruvchi ko'rsatmalar eng katta ta'sirni keltirib chiqardi, keyin esa ochiq va nozik belgilar ".[132]

Some researchers have argued that studies of stereotype threat may in fact systematically under-represent its effects, since such studies measure "only that portion of psychological threat that research has identified and remedied. To the extent that unidentified or unremedied psychological threats further undermine performance, the results underestimate the bias."[138]

Research into the possible genetic influences on test score differences

Jismoniy shaxslar o'rtasidagi IQ farqlari katta irsiy tarkibiy qismga ega ekanligi isbotlangan bo'lsa-da, IQdagi o'rtacha darajadagi farqlar (guruhlar o'rtasidagi farqlar) genetik asosga ega ekanligi kelib chiqmaydi.[139][140] The current scientific consensus is that there is no evidence for a genetic component behind IQ differences between racial groups.[141][142][143][140][144] Growing evidence indicates that environmental factors, not genetic ones, explain the racial IQ gap.[140][144][145]

Genetics of race and intelligence

Genetika mutaxassisi Alan R. Templeton argues that the question about the possible genetic effects on the test score gap is muddled by the general focus on "race" rather than on populations defined by gene frequency or by geographical proximity, and by the general insistence on phrasing the question in terms of heritability.[146] Templeton points out that racial groups neither represent kichik turlar nor distinct evolutionary lineages, and that therefore there is no basis for making claims about the general intelligence of races.[146] From this point of view the search for possible genetic influences on the black–white test score gap is apriori flawed, because there is no genetic material shared by all Africans or by all Europeans. Mackintosh (2011), however, argues that by using genetic cluster analysis to correlate gene frequencies with continental populations it might be possible to show that African populations have a higher frequency of certain genetic variants that contribute to an average lower intelligence. Such a hypothetical situation could hold without all Africans carrying the same genes or belonging to a single evolutionary lineage. According to Mackintosh, a biological basis for the gap thus cannot be ruled out on apriori asoslar.

Intelligence is a poligenik xususiyat. This means that intelligence is under the influence of several genes, possibly several thousand. The effect of most individual genetic variants on intelligence is thought to be very small, well below 1% of the variance in g. Current studies using miqdoriy xususiyat lokuslari have yielded little success in the search for genes influencing intelligence. Robert Plomin is confident that QTLs responsible for the variation in IQ scores exist, but due to their small effect sizes, more powerful tools of analysis will be required to detect them.[147] Others assert that no useful answers can be reasonably expected from such research before an understanding of the relation between DNA and human phenotypes emerges.[76] Several candidate genes have been proposed to have a relationship with intelligence.[148][149] However, a review of candidate genes for intelligence published in Deary, Johnson & Houlihan (2009) failed to find evidence of an association between these genes and general intelligence, stating "there is still almost no replicated evidence concerning the individual genes, which have variants that contribute to intelligence differences".[150] In 2001, a review in the Qora psixologiya jurnali refuted eight major premises on which the hereditarian view regarding race and intelligence is based.[151]

A 2005 literature review article by Sternberg, Grigorenko and Kidd stated that no gene has been shown to be linked to intelligence, "so attempts to provide a compelling genetic link of race to intelligence are not feasible at this time."[152] Hunt (2010, p. 447) concurs with this critique, noting that "The argument for genetic differences has been carried forward largely by circumstantial evidence. Of course, tomorrow afternoon genetic mechanisms producing racial and ethnic differences in intelligence might be discovered, but there have been a lot of investigations, and tomorrow has not come for quite some time now." Mackintosh (2011, p. 344) concurs as well, noting that while several environmental factors have been shown to influence the IQ gap, the evidence for a genetic influence has been negligible. The 2012 review by Nisbett et al. (2012a) concluded that "Almost no genetic polymorphisms have been discovered that are consistently associated with variation in IQ in the normal range." They consider the entire IQ gap to be explained by the environmental factors that have thus far been demonstrated to influence it, and Mackintosh finds this view to be reasonable.

Heritability within and between groups

An environmental factor that varies between groups but not within groups can cause group differences in a trait that is otherwise 100 percent merosxo'r.

Egizak tadqiqotlar of intelligence have reported high heritability values. However, these studies have been criticized for being based on questionable assumptions.[153][154][155] When used in the context of human xulq-atvor genetikasi, the term "heritability" can be misleading, as it does not necessarily convey information about the relative importance of genetic or environmental factors on the development of a given trait, nor does it convey the extent to which that trait is genetically determined.[156] Arguments in support of a genetic explanation of racial differences in IQ are sometimes fallacious. For instance, hereditarians have sometimes cited the failure of known environmental factors to account for such differences, or the high heritability of intelligence within races, as evidence that racial differences in IQ are genetic.[157]

Psychometricians have found that intelligence is substantially heritable within populations, with 30–50% of variance in IQ scores in early childhood being attributable to genetic factors in analyzed US populations, increasing to 75–80% by late adolescence.[54][150] In biology heritability is defined as the ratio of variation attributable to genetic differences in an observable xususiyat to the trait's total observable variation. The heritability of a trait describes the proportion of variation in the trait that is attributable to genetic factors within a particular population. A heritability of 1 indicates that variation correlates fully with genetic variation and a heritability of 0 indicates that there is no correlation between the trait and genes at all. In psychological testing, heritability tends to be understood as the degree of correlation between the results of a test taker and those of their biological parents. However, since high heritability is simply a correlation between child and parents, it does not describe the causes of heritability which in humans can be either genetic or environmental.

Therefore, a high heritability measure does not imply that a trait is genetic or unchangeable. In addition, environmental factors that affect all group members equally will not be measured by heritability, and the heritability of a trait may also change over time in response to changes in the distribution of genetic and environmental factors.[54] High heritability does not imply that all of the heritability is genetically determined; rather, it can also be due to environmental differences that affect only a certain genetically defined group (indirect heritability).[158]

The figure to the right demonstrates how heritability works. In each of the two gardens the difference between tall and short cornstalks is 100% heritable, as cornstalks that are genetically disposed for growing tall will become taller than those without this disposition. But the difference in height between the cornstalks to the left and those on the right is 100% environmental, as it is due to different nutrients being supplied to the two gardens. Hence, the causes of differences within a group and between groups may not be the same, even when looking at traits that are highly heritable.[158] Uning ichida tanqid the Bell Curve, Noam Xomskiy further illustrated this with the example of women wearing earrings:

To borrow an example from Ned Block, "some years ago when only women wore earrings, the heritability of having an earring was high because differences in whether a person had an earring was due to a chromosomal difference, XX vs. XY." No one has yet suggested that wearing earrings, or ties, is "in our genes"...[159]

Spirmanning gipotezasi

Spearman's hypothesis states that the magnitude of the black–white difference in tests of cognitive ability depends entirely or mainly on the extent to which a test measures general mental ability, or g. The hypothesis was first formalized by Artur Jensen, who devised the statistical "method of correlated vectors" to test it. If Spearman's hypothesis holds true, then the cognitive tasks that have the highest g-load are the tasks in which the gap between black and white test takers are greatest. Jensen and Rushton take this to show that the cause of g and the cause of the gap are the same—in their view, genetic differences.[22]

Mackintosh (2011, pp. 338–39) acknowledges that Jensen and Rushton showed a modest correlation between g-loading, heritability, and the test score gap, but does not agree that this demonstrates a genetic origin of the gap. Mackintosh argues that it is exactly those tests that Rushton and Jensen consider to have the highest g-loading and heritability, such as the Wechsler test, that have seen the greatest increases in black performance due to the Flynn effect. This likely suggests that they are also the most sensitive to environmental changes, which undermines Jensen's argument that the black–white gap is most likely caused by genetic factors. Mackintosh also argues that Spearman's hypothesis, which he considers to be likely to be correct, simply shows that the test score gap is based on whatever cognitive faculty is central to intelligence, but does not show what this factor is. Nisbett et al. (2012a, p. 146) make the same point, noting also that the increase in the IQ scores of black test takers necessarily indicates an increase in g.

Flynn has criticized Jensen's basic assumption that confirmation of Spearman's hypothesis would support a partially genetic explanation for IQ differences. He argues that, no matter what the causes are of average group IQ differences, one would expect the differences to be greater for more complex tasks. Flynn thus sees the correlation between g-loading and the test score gap to offer no clue to the cause of the gap.[160]

Adoption studies

A number of IQ studies have been done on the effect of similar rearing conditions on children from different races. The hypothesis is that this can be determined by investigating whether black children adopted into white families demonstrated gains in IQ test scores relative to black children reared in black families. Depending on whether their test scores are more similar to their biological or adoptive families, that could be interpreted as supporting either a genetic or an environmental hypothesis. Critiques of such studies question whether the environment of black children—even when raised in white families—is truly comparable to the environment of white children. Several reviews of the adoption study literature have suggested that it is probably impossible to avoid confounding biological and environmental factors in this type of study.[161] Another criticism by Nisbett et al. (2012a, pp. 134) is that adoption studies on the whole tend to be carried out in a restricted set of environments, mostly in the medium-high SES range, where heritability is higher than in the low-SES range.

The MINNESOTA Transracial asrab olish bo'yicha tadqiqot (1976) examined the IQ test scores of 122 qabul qilingan children and 143 nonadopted children reared by advantaged white families. The children were restudied ten years later.[162][163][164] The study found higher IQ for white people compared to black people, both at age 7 and age 17.[162] Acknowledging the existence of confounding factors, Scarr and Weinberg, the authors of the original study, did not consider that it provided support for either the hereditarian or environmentalist view.[165]

Three other studies lend support to environmental explanations of group IQ differences:

  • Eyferth (1961) studied the out-of-wedlock children of black and white soldiers stationed in Germany after World War II who were then raised by white German mothers in what has become known as the Eyferth study. He found no significant differences in average IQ between groups.
  • Tizard et al. (1972) studied black (West Indian), white, and mixed-race children raised in British long-stay residential nurseries. Two out of three tests found no significant differences. One test found higher scores for non-white people.
  • Moore (1986) compared black and mixed-race children adopted by either black or white middle-class families in the United States. Moore observed that 23 black and interracial children raised by white parents had a significantly higher mean score than 23 age-matched children raised by black parents (117 vs 104), and argued that differences in early socialization explained these differences.

Frydman and Lynn (1989) showed a mean IQ of 119 for Korean infants adopted by Belgian families. After correcting for the Flinn effekti, the IQ of the adopted Korean children was still 10 points higher than that of the Belgian children.[166][22][167]

Reviewing the evidence from adoption studies, Mackintosh finds that environmental and genetic variables remain confounded and considers evidence from adoption studies inconclusive, and fully compatible with a 100% environmental explanation.[161] Similarly, Drew Thomas argues that race differences in IQ that appear in adoption studies are in fact an artifact of methodology, and that East Asian IQ advantages and black IQ disadvantages disappear when this is controlled for.[168]

Racial admixture studies

Most people have ancestry from different geographical regions. In particular, African Americans typically have ancestors from both Africa and Europe, with, on average, 20% of their genome inherited from European ancestors.[169] If racial IQ gaps have a partially genetic basis, one might expect black people with a higher degree of European ancestry to score higher on IQ tests than black people with less European ancestry, because the genes inherited from European ancestors would likely include some genes with a positive effect on IQ.[170] Genetika mutaxassisi Alan Templeton has argued that an experiment based on the Mendelian "common garden" design, where specimens with different hybrid compositions are subjected to the same environmental influences, are the only way to definitively show a causal relation between genes and group differences in IQ. Summarizing the findings of admixture studies, he concludes that they have shown no significant correlation between any cognitive ability and the degree of African or European ancestry.[171]

Studies have employed different ways of measuring or approximating relative degrees of ancestry from Africa and Europe. Some studies have used skin color as a measure, and others have used blood groups. Loehlin (2000) surveys the literature and argues that the blood groups studies may be seen as providing some support to the genetic hypothesis, even though the correlation between ancestry and IQ was quite low. He finds that studies by Eyferth (1961), Willerman, Naylor & Myrianthopoulos (1970) did not find a correlation between degree of African/European ancestry and IQ. The latter study did find a difference based on the race of the mother, with children of white mothers with black fathers scoring higher than children of black mothers and white fathers. Loehlin considers that such a finding is compatible with either a genetic or an environmental cause. All in all Loehlin finds admixture studies inconclusive and recommends more research.

Reviewing the evidence from admixture studies Hunt (2010) considers it to be inconclusive because of too many uncontrolled variables. Mackintosh (2011, p. 338) quotes a statement by Nisbett (2009) to the effect that admixture studies have not provided a shred of evidence in favor of a genetic basis for the IQ gap.

Aqliy xronometriya

Aqliy xronometriya measures the elapsed time between the presentation of a sensory stimulus and the subsequent behavioral response by the participant. This reaction time (RT) is considered a measure of the speed and efficiency with which the brain processes information.[172] Scores on most types of RT tasks tend to correlate with scores on standard IQ tests as well as with g, and no relationship has been found between RT and any other psychometric factors independent of g.[172] The strength of the correlation with IQ varies from one RT test to another, but Xans Aysenk gives 0.40 as a typical correlation under favorable conditions.[173] According to Jensen, individual differences in RT have a substantial genetic component, and heritability is higher for performance on tests that correlate more strongly with IQ.[174] Nisbett argues that some studies have found correlations closer to 0.2, and that a correlation is not always found.[175]

Several studies have found differences between races in average reaction times. These studies have generally found that reaction times among black, Asian and white children follow the same pattern as IQ scores.[176][177][178] Black–white differences in reaction time, however, tend to be small (average effekt hajmi .18).[179] Rushton & Jensen (2005) have argued that reaction time is independent of culture and that the existence of race differences in average reaction time is evidence that the cause of racial IQ gaps is partially genetic. Responding to this argument in Intelligence and How to Get It, Nisbett points to the Jensen & Whang (1993) study in which a group of Chinese Americans had longer reaction times than a group of European Americans, despite having higher IQs. Nisbett also mentions findings in Flynn (1991) va Deary (2001) suggesting that movement time (the measure of how long it takes a person to move a finger after making the decision to do so) correlates with IQ just as strongly as reaction time, and that average movement time is faster for black people than for white people.[180] Mackintosh (2011, p. 339) considers reaction time evidence unconvincing and comments that other cognitive tests that also correlate well with IQ show no disparity at all, for example the habituation/dishabituation sinov. He further comments that studies show that rhesus monkeys have shorter reaction times than American college students, suggesting that different reaction times may not tell us anything useful about intelligence.

Miyaning kattaligi

A number of studies have reported a moderate statistical correlation between differences in IQ and brain size between individuals in the same group.[181][182] Some scholars have reported differences in average brain sizes between racial groups,[183] although this is unlikely to be a good measure of IQ as brain size also differs between men and women, but without significant differences in IQ.[iqtibos kerak ] At the same time newborn black children have the same average brain size as white children, suggesting that the difference in average size could be accounted for by differences in environment.[iqtibos kerak ] Several factors that reduce brain size have been demonstrated to disproportionately affect black children.[104]

Archaeological data

Archaeological evidence does not support claims by Rushton and others that black people's cognitive ability was inferior to white people's during prehistoric times as a result of evolution.[184]

Policy relevance and ethics

The axloq qoidalari of research on race and intelligence has long been a subject of debate: in a 1996 report of the Amerika psixologik assotsiatsiyasi;[54] in guidelines proposed by Gray and Thompson and by Hunt and Carlson;[46][185] and in two editorials in Tabiat 2009 yilda Stiven Rouz va tomonidan Stiven J. Ceci va Vendi M. Uilyams.[186][187]

Stiven Rouz maintains that the history of evgenika makes this field of research difficult to reconcile with current ethical standards for science.[187]Boshqa tarafdan, Jeyms R. Flinn has argued that had there been a ban on research on possibly poorly conceived ideas, much valuable research on intelligence testing (including his own discovery of the Flinn effekti ) would not have occurred.[188]

Jensen and Rushton argued that what they believe to be biological differences in intelligence between races raises questions about the worthiness of policies such as tasdiqlovchi harakat and promotion of diversity.[13][189]

Many have argued for increased interventions in order to close the gaps.[190] Flynn writes that "America will have to address all the aspects of black experience that are disadvantageous, beginning with the regeneration of inner city neighborhoods and their schools."[191] Especially in developing nations, society has been urged to take on the prevention of cognitive impairment in children as a high priority. Possible preventable causes include to'yib ovqatlanmaslik, yuqumli kasalliklar kabi meningit, parazitlar, miya yarim bezgak, bachadonda dori va spirtli ichimliklar exposure, newborn asfiksiya, kam vazn, head injuries, qo'rg'oshin bilan zaharlanish va endokrin kasalliklar.[192]

Shuningdek qarang

Manbalar

Izohlar

  1. ^ Ga ko'ra Yangi shtat arbobi, "jurnal Aql is one of the most respected in its field" but has allowed its reputation "to be used to launder or legitimate racist pseudo-science"..[116] Unga kiritilganligi uchun tanqid qilingan tahririyat kengashi biokimyogar Gerxard Mayzenberg va psixolog Richard Lin, ikkalasi ham tarafdorlari evgenika va ilmiy irqchilik.[117][116][118]

Adabiyotlar

  1. ^ Jackson & Weidman 2004, p. 23.
  2. ^ Plotnik & Kouyoumdjian 2011.
  3. ^ Terman, Lewis (1916). The Measurement Of Intelligence. Xyuton, Mifflin va Kompaniya. p. 91. OCLC  557712625.
  4. ^ Jackson & Weidman 2004, p. 116.
  5. ^ Jackson & Weidman 2004, pp. 116, 309.
  6. ^ Pickren & Rutherford 2010, p. 163.
  7. ^ Spiro 2009.
  8. ^ Ludy 2006
  9. ^ Jackson & Weidman 2004, pp. 130–32.
  10. ^ a b v Tucker 2002 yil.
  11. ^ Jekson 2005 yil.
  12. ^ Shurkin 2006.
  13. ^ a b Jensen 1969, pp. 1–123.
  14. ^ Panofskiy, Aaron (2014). Ilmni noto'g'ri tutish. Qarama-qarshiliklar va xulq-atvor genetikasining rivojlanishi. Chikago: Chikago universiteti matbuoti. ISBN  978-0-226-05831-3.
  15. ^ Alland 2002, 79-80-betlar.
  16. ^ Herrnstein & Murray 1994.
  17. ^ a b Maltby, Day & Macaskill 2007 yil
  18. ^ Mackintosh 1998 yil
  19. ^ Graves 2002a.
  20. ^ Graves 2002b.
  21. ^ Grossman & Kaufman 2001
  22. ^ a b v Rushton va Jensen 2005 yil.
  23. ^ Adam, Miller (1994). "The Pioneer Fund: Bankrolling the Professors of Hate". Oliy ta'limdagi qora tanlilar jurnali (6): 58–61.
  24. ^ Blakemore, Bill; Jennings, Piter; Nissen, Beth (November 22, 1994). "The Bell Curve and the Pioneer Fund". ABC World News Tonight. ABC News. Vanderbilt Television News Archive : ABC Evening News for Tuesday, Nov 22, 1994. Headline: American Agenda (Intelligence)
  25. ^ Montagu, Ashley (2002). Irq va IQ (2 nashr). Nyu-York: Oksford universiteti matbuoti. ISBN  9780195102215.
  26. ^ Berlet 2003.
  27. ^ Pioneer Fund Board Arxivlandi 2011-05-25 da Orqaga qaytish mashinasi
  28. ^ Falk 2008, p. 18
  29. ^ Wroe 2008, p. 81
  30. ^ a b Schacter, Gilbert & Wegner 2007, pp. 350–1
  31. ^ a b Sternberg, Grigorenko & Kidd 2005
  32. ^ Hurmatli, I. J .; Lawn, M.; Bartholomew, D. J. (2008). ""A conversation between Charles Spearman, Godfrey Thomson, and Edward L. Thorndike: The International Examinations Inquiry Meetings 1931-1938": Correction to Deary, Lawn, and Bartholomew (2008)" (PDF). Psixologiya tarixi. 11 (3): 156–157. doi:10.1037/1093-4510.11.3.163.
  33. ^ Jensen 1998, p.445ff.
  34. ^ Ceci, Stephen J. (1991). "How much does schooling influence general intelligence and its cognitive components? A reassessment of the evidence". Rivojlanish psixologiyasi. 27 (5): 703–722. doi:10.1037/0012-1649.27.5.703.
  35. ^ a b v Dickens & Flynn 2006.
  36. ^ Richie, Stuart J.; Tucker-Drob, Elliot (June 2018). "How Much Does Education Improve Intelligence? A Meta-Analysis". Psixologiya fanlari. 29 (8).
  37. ^ Mackintosh 2011, p. 359.
  38. ^ Daley & Onwuegbuzie 2011, p. 294.
  39. ^ Templeton, A. (2016). EVRUTSIYA VA INSON ROSSI TASHKILOTLARI. Losos J. va Lenski R. (Eds.), Evolyutsiya hayotimizni qanday shakllantiradi: biologiya va jamiyat haqidagi insholar (346-361-betlar). Prinston; Oksford: Prinston universiteti matbuoti. doi:10.2307 / j.ctv7h0s6j.26. Ushbu nuqtai nazar amerikalik antropologlarning kelishuvini aks ettiradi: Vagner, Jennifer K.; Yu, Jun-Xo; Ifekvunigve, Jeyn O.; Harrell, Tanya M.; Bamsad, Maykl J.; Royal, Charmaine D. (2017 yil fevral). "Antropologlarning irq, ajdodlar va genetika haqidagi qarashlari". Amerika jismoniy antropologiya jurnali. 162 (2): 318–327. doi:10.1002 / ajpa.23120. PMC  5299519. PMID  27874171. Shuningdek qarang: Amerika jismoniy antropologlari assotsiatsiyasi (27 March 2019). "AAPA ning irq va irqchilik to'g'risida bayonoti". Amerika jismoniy antropologlari assotsiatsiyasi. Olingan 19 iyun 2020.
  40. ^ Smay & Armelagos 2000.
  41. ^ Rotimi, Charles N. (2004). "Are medical and nonmedical uses of large-scale genomic markers conflating genetics and 'race'?". Tabiat genetikasi. 36 (11 Suppl): 43–47. doi:10.1038/ng1439. PMID  15508002. Two facts are relevant: (i) as a result of different evolutionary forces, including natural selection, there are geographical patterns of genetic variations that correspond, for the most part, to continental origin; and (ii) observed patterns of geographical differences in genetic information do not correspond to our notion of social identities, including 'race' and 'ethnicity
  42. ^ Schaefer 2008 yil
  43. ^ AAA 1998
  44. ^ "AAPA ning irq va irqchilik to'g'risida bayonoti".
  45. ^ Rowe 2005
  46. ^ a b Hunt & Carlson 2007
  47. ^ Sternberg & Grigorenko 2007
  48. ^ Brace 2005
  49. ^ Graves 2001
  50. ^ Hampshire et al. 2012 yil.
  51. ^ Jackson & Weidman 2004, p. 222.
  52. ^ Ta'limdagi xilma-xillik ensiklopediyasi. SAGE. 2012. p. 1209. ISBN  9781412981521.
  53. ^ Roth et al. 2001 yil
  54. ^ a b v d e f g h Neisser et al. 1996 yil.
  55. ^ Demie, Feyisa; McLean, Christabel (1 December 2007). "Raising the achievement of African heritage pupils: a case study of good practice in British schools". Ta'lim ishlari. 33 (4): 415–434. doi:10.1080/03055690701423606. ISSN  0305-5698. S2CID  144579288.
  56. ^ Rutter, Jill (2013). Back to basics: Towards a successful and cost-effective integration policy. Davlat siyosatini o'rganish instituti. p. 43.
  57. ^ Feyisa Demie, Andrew Hau (2016). Language Diversity and Attainment in Primary Schools in England (PDF). Lambeth Research And Statistics Unit. p. 18.
  58. ^ "GCSE English and maths results". Hukumat. 2019.
  59. ^ Mackintosh 1998 yil, p. 162
  60. ^ Sveyn, Kerol (2003). Amerikadagi oq millatchilikning zamonaviy ovozlari. Kembrij, Buyuk Britaniya, Nyu-York: Kembrij universiteti matbuoti. p.70. ISBN  978-0521016933. Izoh: ushbu iqtibos intervyulardan emas, balki mualliflarning kirish insholaridan olingan.
  61. ^ Vincent 1991.
  62. ^ Neisser, Ulric (Ed). 1998. The rising curve: Long-term gains in IQ and related measures. Washington, DC, US: American Psychological Association
  63. ^ Mackintosh 2011.
  64. ^ Nisbett, Richard E.; Aronson, Joshua; Bler, Klensi; Dikkens, Uilyam; Flinn, Jeyms; Halpern, Diane F.; Turkheimer, Eric (2012a). "Intelligence: new findings and theoretical developments" (PDF). Amerika psixologi. 67 (2): 130–159. doi:10.1037 / a0026699. ISSN  0003-066X. PMID  22233090. Olingan 22 iyul 2013. Xulosa (2013 yil 22-iyul).
  65. ^ a b Bellinger, Stiles & Needleman 1992
  66. ^ MMWR 2005
  67. ^ a b Kempbell va boshq. 2002 yil
  68. ^ Ivanovic et al. 2004 yil
  69. ^ Saloojee & Pettifor 2001
  70. ^ Agency For Toxic Substances And Disease Registry Case Studies In Environmental Medicine (CSEM) (2012-02-15). "Principles of Pediatric Environmental Health, The Child as Susceptible Host: A Developmental Approach to Pediatric Environmental Medicine" (PDF). U.S. Department for Health and Human Services. Olingan 2019-01-30.
  71. ^ Lanphear, Bryus P.; Hornung, Richard; Khoury, Jane; Yolton, Kimberly; Baghurst, Peter; Bellinger, David C.; Canfield, Richard L.; Dietrich, Kim N.; Bornschein, Robert; Greene, Tom; Rothenberg, Stephen J.; Igna, Gerbert L.; Schnaas, Lourdes; Wasserman, Gail; Graziano, Joseph; Roberts, Russell (2005-03-18). "Low-Level Environmental Lead Exposure and Children's Intellectual Function: An International Pooled Analysis". Atrof muhitni muhofaza qilish istiqbollari. 113 (7): 894–899. doi:10.1289/ehp.7688. ISSN  0091-6765. PMC  1257652. PMID  16002379.
  72. ^ Qian et al. 2005 yil
  73. ^ Feyrer, Jeyms; Politi, Dimitra; Vayl, Devid N. (2017). "Mikroelementlar etishmasligining kognitiv ta'siri: Qo'shma Shtatlardagi tuz yodlanishidan dalillar" (PDF). Evropa iqtisodiy assotsiatsiyasi jurnali. 15 (2): 355–387. doi:10.1093 / jeea / jvw002. PMC  6919660. PMID  31853231.
  74. ^ The Lancet Series on Maternal and Child Undernutrition, 2008.
  75. ^ Nisbett 2009, p. 101
  76. ^ a b Kuper 2005 yil
  77. ^ Mackintosh 2011, pp. 343–44.
  78. ^ Behrman, Alderman & Hoddinott 2004
  79. ^ Kolom, R .; Lluis-Font, J. M.; Andrés-Pueyo, A. (2005). "The generational intelligence gains are caused by decreasing variance in the lower half of the distribution: supporting evidence for the nutrition hypothesis". Aql. 33: 83–91. doi:10.1016/j.intell.2004.07.010.
  80. ^ Flynn, J. R. (2009a). "Requiem for nutrition as the cause of IQ gains: Raven's gains in Britain 1938 to 2008". Iqtisodiyot va inson biologiyasi. 7 (1): 18–27. doi:10.1016/j.ehb.2009.01.009. PMID  19251490.
  81. ^ Eppig, Fincher & Thornhill 2010
  82. ^ Eppig 2011
  83. ^ Christopher Eppig, Corey L. Fincher, and Randy Thornhill Parasite prevalence and the worldwide distribution of cognitive ability Proc R Soc B 2010: rspb.2010.0973v1-rspb20100973. http://rspb.royalsocietypublishing.org/content/early/2010/06/29/rspb.2010.0973.abstract
  84. ^ Horta, Bernardo L.; Victoria, Cesar G. (2013). "Long-term effects of breastfeeding – a systemic review" (PDF). Jahon Sog'liqni saqlash tashkiloti. Olingan 18 iyun 2018.
  85. ^ Colen, Cynthia G.; Ramey, David M. (2014). "Is Breast Truly Best? Estimating the Effect of Breastfeeding on Long-term Child Wellbeing in the United States Using Sibling Comparisons". Ijtimoiy fan va tibbiyot. 109 (1): 55–65. doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2014.01.027. PMC  4077166. PMID  24698713.
  86. ^ Reichman 2005
  87. ^ Manly et al. 2002 yil va Manly et al. 2004 yil
  88. ^ Mickelson 2003
  89. ^ Elhoweris et al. 2005 yil
  90. ^ Miele 2002 yil, p. 133
  91. ^ Fagan, Joseph F; Holland, Cynthia R (2002). "Equal opportunity and racial differences in IQ". Aql. 30 (4): 361–387. doi:10.1016/S0160-2896(02)00080-6.
  92. ^ Fagan, J.F.; Holland, C.R. (2007). "Racial equality in intelligence: Predictions from a theory of intelligence as processing". Aql. 35 (4): 319–334. doi:10.1016/j.intell.2006.08.009.
  93. ^ Daley & Onwuegbuzie 2011.
  94. ^ Marks, D.F. (2010). "IQ variations across time, race, and nationality: An artifact of differences in literacy skills". Psixologik hisobotlar. 106 (3): 643–664. doi:10.2466 / pr0.106.3.643-664. PMID  20712152. S2CID  12179547.
  95. ^ Barry, Scott (2010-08-23). "Flinn effekti va irq, etnik guruh va millatlar o'rtasidagi IQ farqlari: umumiy aloqalar mavjudmi?". Bugungi kunda psixologiya. Olingan 2014-08-22.
  96. ^ McKay, Patrick F.; Doverspike, Dennis; Bowen‐Hilton, Doreen; McKay, Quintonia D. (2003). "The Effects of Demographic Variables and Stereotype Threat on Black/White Differences in Cognitive Ability Test Performance". Biznes va psixologiya jurnali. 18 (1): 1–14. doi:10.1023/A:1025062703113. S2CID  142317051.
  97. ^ Ov 2010, p. 428.
  98. ^ Magnuson, Katherine A.; Duncan, Greg J. (December 2006). "The role of family socioeconomic resources in the black–white test score gap among young children". Rivojlanish sharhi. 26 (4): 365–399. doi:10.1016/j.dr.2006.06.004.
  99. ^ Scarr-Salapatek, S. (1971). "Race, social class, and IQ". Ilm-fan. 174 (4016): 1285–95. Bibcode:1971Sci...174.1285S. doi:10.1126/science.174.4016.1285. PMID  5167501.
  100. ^ Scarr-Salapatek, S. (1974). "Some myths about heritability and IQ". Tabiat. 251 (5475): 463–464. Bibcode:1974Natur.251..463S. doi:10.1038/251463b0. S2CID  32437709.
  101. ^ D. C. Rowe. (1994). The Limits of Family Influence: Genes, Experience and Behaviour. Guilford Press. London
  102. ^ Kirkpatrick, R. M.; McGue, M.; Iacono, W. G. (2015). "Replication of a gene-environment interaction Via Multimodel inference: additive-genetic variance in adolescents' general cognitive ability increases with family-of-origin socioeconomic status". Behav Genet. 45 (2): 200–14. doi:10.1007/s10519-014-9698-y. PMC  4374354. PMID  25539975.
  103. ^ Bronfenbrenner, Urie; Ceci, Stephen J. (October 1994). "Nature-nuture reconceptualized in developmental perspective: A bioecological model". Psixologik sharh. 101 (4): 568–586. doi:10.1037/0033-295x.101.4.568. PMID  7984707.
  104. ^ a b Nisbett et al. 2012a.
  105. ^ Cottrell, Newman & Roisman 2015.
  106. ^ Cronshaw et al. 2006 yil, p. 278
  107. ^ Verney et al. 2005 yil
  108. ^ Borsboom 2006
  109. ^ Shuttleworth-Edwards et al. 2004 yil
  110. ^ Richardson 2004 yil
  111. ^ Hunt & Wittmann 2008
  112. ^ Irvine 1983
  113. ^ Irvine & Berry 1988 a collection of articles by several authors discussing the limits of assessment by intelligence tests in different communities in the world. Jumladan, Reuning (1988) describes the difficulties in devising and administering tests for Kalahari bushmen.
  114. ^ Mackintosh 1998 yil, p. 174: "Despite widespread belief to the contrary, however, there is ample evidence, both in Britain and the USA, that IQ tests predict educational attainment just about as well in ethnic minorities as in the white majority."
  115. ^ "Reflections about intelligence over 40 years" (PDF). Aql (70): 73–83. 2018.
  116. ^ a b "Bu yolg'on fan bo'lishi mumkin, ammo talabalar evgenika tahdidiga jiddiy qarashadi". Yangi shtat arbobi. Olingan 2018-12-17.
  117. ^ Saini, Anjela (2018-01-22). "Irqchilik asosiy oqimga aylanib bormoqda - biz buni to'xtatishimiz kerak". Guardian. ISSN  0261-3077. Olingan 2018-12-17.
  118. ^ "Yuzlab akademiklar Kembrijdan" irqchi psevdologiya "ni nashr etishda ayblangan tadqiqotchini tekshirishni talab qilmoqdalar'". Mustaqil. 2018-12-07. Olingan 2018-12-17.
  119. ^ Reeve, Charlie L.; Charles, Jennifer E. (2008). "Survey of opinions on the primacy of g and social consequences of ability testing: A comparison of expert and non-expert views". Aql. 36 (6): 681–688. doi:10.1016/j.intell.2008.03.007. ISSN  0160-2896. Specifically, the results suggest there is consensus among experts that g is an important, non-trivial determinant (or at least predictor) of important real world outcomes, and that tests of g are valid, and generally free from racial bias. [...] Although claims of bias can still be found in the popular press, we know of no reliable evidence that professionally developed intelligence tests, or the factor scores derived from such tests, are subject to cultural or measurement test bias.
  120. ^ Murphy, Kevin R.; Cronin, Brian E.; Tam, Anita P. (2003). "Controversy and consensus regarding the use of cognitive ability testing in organizations". Amaliy psixologiya jurnali. 88 (4): 660–671. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.88.4.660. ISSN  1939-1854. PMID  12940406.
  121. ^ Aronson, Wilson & Akert 2005
  122. ^ Steele, Claude M. (1997). "A threat in the air: How stereotypes shape intellectual identity and performance". Amerika psixologi. 52 (6): 613–629. CiteSeerX  10.1.1.319.8283. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.52.6.613. ISSN  0003-066X. PMID  9174398.
  123. ^ Mackintosh 2011, p. 348.
  124. ^ Ogbu 1978.
  125. ^ Ogbu 1994.
  126. ^ Chan, D.; Schmitt, N.; DeShon, R. P.; Clause, C. S.; Delbridge, K. (April 1997). "Reactions to cognitive ability tests: the relationships between race, test performance, face validity perceptions, and test-taking motivation". Amaliy psixologiya jurnali. 82 (2): 300–310. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.82.2.300. ISSN  0021-9010. PMID  9109288.
  127. ^ Ganley CM, Mingle LA, Ryan AM, Ryan K, Vasilyeva M, Perry M (October 2013). "An examination of stereotype threat effects on girls' mathematics performance" (PDF). Rivojlanish psixologiyasi. 49 (10): 1886–97. CiteSeerX  10.1.1.353.4436. doi:10.1037/a0031412. PMID  23356523. Arxivlandi asl nusxasi (PDF) 2014 yil 19-iyulda.
  128. ^ Stoet G, Geary DC (2012). "Can stereotype threat explain the gender gap in mathematics performance and achievement?". Umumiy psixologiyani ko'rib chiqish. 16: 93–102. doi:10.1037/a0026617. S2CID  145724069. PDF. Arxivlandi 2016-01-12 da Orqaga qaytish mashinasi
  129. ^ Flore PC, Wicherts JM (February 2015). "Does stereotype threat influence performance of girls in stereotyped domains? A meta-analysis". Maktab psixologiyasi jurnali. 53 (1): 25–44. doi:10.1016/j.jsp.2014.10.002. PMID  25636259.
  130. ^ Sackett PR, Hardison CM, Cullen MJ (January 2004). "On interpreting stereotype threat as accounting for African American-White differences on cognitive tests" (PDF). Amerikalik psixolog. 59 (1): 7–13. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.59.1.7. PMID  14736315. Arxivlandi asl nusxasi (PDF) 2013-04-04 da.
  131. ^ Pennington CR, Heim D, Levy AR, Larkin DT (2016-01-11). "Yigirma yillik stereotip tahdidni tadqiq qilish: psixologik mediatorlar sharhi". PLOS ONE. 11 (1): e0146487. Bibcode:2016PLoSO..1146487P. doi:10.1371 / journal.pone.0146487. PMC  4713435. PMID  26752551.
  132. ^ a b Nguyen HH, Ryan AM (November 2008). "Does stereotype threat affect test performance of minorities and women? A meta-analysis of experimental evidence". Amaliy psixologiya jurnali. 93 (6): 1314–34. doi:10.1037/a0012702. PMID  19025250.
  133. ^ Uolton, Gregori M.; Spencer, Steven J. (2009-09-01). "Latent Ability: Grades and Test Scores Systematically Underestimate the Intellectual Ability of Negatively Stereotyped Students". Psixologiya fanlari. 20 (9): 1132–1139. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2009.02417.x. ISSN  0956-7976. PMID  19656335. S2CID  25810191.
  134. ^ Gentile, Ambra; Boca, Stefano; Giammusso, Isabella (2018-11-01). "'You play like a Woman!' Effects of gender stereotype threat on Women's performance in physical and sport activities: A meta-analysis". Sport va jismoniy mashqlar psixologiyasi. 39: 95–103. doi:10.1016/j.psychsport.2018.07.013. ISSN  1469-0292. S2CID  149490634.
  135. ^ Lamont, Ruth A.; Swift, Hannah J.; Abrams, Dominic (2015). "A Review and Meta-Analysis of Age-Based Stereotype Threat: Negative Stereotypes, Not Facts, Do the Damage". Psixologiya va qarish. 30 (1): 180–193. doi:10.1037/a0038586. ISSN  1939-1498. PMC  4360754. PMID  25621742.
  136. ^ Picho, Katherine; Rodriguez, Ariel; Finnie, Lauren (May 2013). "Exploring the Moderating Role of Context on the Mathematics Performance of Females Under Stereotype Threat: A Meta-Analysis". Ijtimoiy psixologiya jurnali. 153 (3): 299–333. doi:10.1080/00224545.2012.737380. PMID  23724702. S2CID  45950675.
  137. ^ Liu, Songqi; Liu, Pei; Wang, Mo; Zhang, Baoshan (July 2020). "Effectiveness of Stereotype Threat Interventions: A Meta-Analytic Review". Amaliy psixologiya jurnali. currently in press. doi:10.1037/apl0000770. PMID  32772526.
  138. ^ Uolton, Gregori M.; Spencer, Steven J. (2009-09-01)."Yashirin qobiliyat: sinflar va test natijalari salbiy ravishda stereotipli o'quvchilarning intellektual qobiliyatini muntazam ravishda past baholaydilar". Psixologiya fanlari. 20 (9): 1132–1139. doi:10.1111 / j.1467-9280.2009.02417.x. ISSN  0956-7976. PMID  19656335. S2CID  25810191.
  139. ^ Nisbett, Richard E.; Aronson, Joshua; Bler, Klensi; Dikkens, Uilyam; Flinn, Jeyms; Halpern, Diane F.; Turkxaymer, Erik (2012). "Intellekt: yangi topilmalar va nazariy ishlanmalar". Amerika psixologi. 67 (2): 130–159. doi:10.1037 / a0026699. ISSN  1935-990 yillar. PMID  22233090.
  140. ^ a b v Nisbett, Richard E.; Aronson, Joshua; Bler, Klensi; Dikkens, Uilyam; Flinn, Jeyms; Halpern, Diane F.; Turkxaymer, Erik (2012). "IQ-dagi guruh farqlari kelib chiqishi atrof-muhit sifatida yaxshi tushuniladi" (PDF). Amerika psixologi. 67 (6): 503–504. doi:10.1037 / a0029772. ISSN  0003-066X. PMID  22963427. Olingan 22 iyul 2013. Xulosa (2013 yil 22-iyul).
  141. ^ Ceci & Williams 2009 yil, 788-789-betlar, "Intellektning genetik determinantlarida irqiy va gender tengligi to'g'risida yangi kelishuv mavjud; aksariyat tadqiqotchilar, shu jumladan o'zimiz ham, genlar guruhlar o'rtasidagi farqlarni tushuntirmasligiga qo'shilamiz".
  142. ^ Ov 2010, p. 447.
  143. ^ Mackintosh 2011 yil, 334–338, 344-betlar.
  144. ^ a b Kaplan, Jonatan Maykl (2015 yil yanvar). "Irq, IQ va" X "omillari bilan bog'liq statistik signallarni qidirish: muhit, irqchilik va" irsiy gipoteza """. Biologiya va falsafa. 30 (1): 1–17. doi:10.1007 / s10539-014-9428-0. ISSN  0169-3867. S2CID  85351431.
  145. ^ Nevid 2014 yil, p. 271.
  146. ^ a b Templeton 2001 yil
  147. ^ Plomin, Kennedi va Kreyg 2005 yil, p. 513
  148. ^ Zinkstok va boshq. 2007 yil
  149. ^ Dik va boshq. 2007 yil
  150. ^ a b Hurmatli, Jonson va Xulixan 2009 yil
  151. ^ Onwuegbuzie & Daley 2001 yil
  152. ^ Sternberg, Grigorenko va Kidd 2005 yil, p. 46.
  153. ^ Karson, Maykl; Bekvit, Jon (2001). "Irq", IQ va Genlar. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. 1-5 betlar. doi:10.1002 / 9780470015902.a0005689.pub3. ISBN  9780470015902.
  154. ^ Bekvit, Jon; Morris, Kori A. (dekabr 2008). "Siyosiy xulq-atvorni egizak o'rganish: ishonib bo'lmaydigan taxminlarmi?". Siyosatning istiqbollari. 6 (4): 785–791. doi:10.1017 / S1537592708081917. ISSN  1541-0986. S2CID  55630117.
  155. ^ Kamin, Leon J.; Goldberger, Artur S. (2002 yil fevral). "Behavioral tadqiqotlarda egizak tadqiqotlar: skeptik qarash". Aholining nazariy biologiyasi. 61 (1): 83–95. doi:10.1006 / tpbi.2001.1555. ISSN  0040-5809. PMID  11895384.
  156. ^ Mur va Shenk 2016.
  157. ^ Makkenzi 1984 yil
  158. ^ a b 2002 yil blok
  159. ^ Qaytish, II qism Noam Xomskiy, 1995 yil
  160. ^ Flinn, Jeyms R. (2010). "Men poyga va IQ bo'yicha bahslarni ko'radigan ko'zoynaklar" (PDF). Aql. 38 (4): 363–366. doi:10.1016 / j.intell.2010.05.001.
  161. ^ a b Mackintosh 2011 yil, p. 337.
  162. ^ a b Weinberg, Scarr & Waldman 1992 yil
  163. ^ Scarr & Weinberg 1976 yil.
  164. ^ Loehlin 2000, p. 185.
  165. ^ Scarr & Weinberg 1990 yil.
  166. ^ Loehlin 2000, p. 187.
  167. ^ Fridman va Lin (1989). "Belgiyada qabul qilingan koreys bolalarining razvedkasi". Shaxsiyat va individual farqlar. 10 (12): 1323–1325. doi:10.1016/0191-8869(89)90246-8.
  168. ^ Tomas, Drew (2017). "Transracial qabul qilinganlarning irqiy IQ farqlari: haqiqatmi yoki artifaktmi?". Intelligence jurnali. 5 (1): 1. doi:10.3390 / jintelligence5010001. PMC  6526420. PMID  31162392.
  169. ^ Bryc va boshq. 2009 yil
  170. ^ Loehlin 2000.
  171. ^ Templeton 2001 yil.
  172. ^ a b Jensen 2006 yil
  173. ^ Eysenck 1987 yil
  174. ^ Jensen 1998 yil
  175. ^ Nisbett 2009 yil
  176. ^ Lin va Vanhanen 2002 yil.
  177. ^ Jensen va Vang 1993 yil.
  178. ^ Pesta va Poznanski 2008 yil.
  179. ^ Sheppard va Vernon 2008 yil.
  180. ^ Nisbett 2009 yil, 221-2 bet.
  181. ^ Hurmatli, Penke va Jonson 2010 yil.
  182. ^ McDaniel 2005 yil.
  183. ^ Xo va boshq. 1980 yil.
  184. ^ MacEachern 2006 yil.
  185. ^ Grey & Tompson 2004 yil
  186. ^ Ceci & Williams 2009 yil
  187. ^ a b Gul 2009 yil, 786–88-betlar
  188. ^ Flinn 2009b
  189. ^ Rushton va Jensen 2005 yil
  190. ^ Jenks, Kristofer; Fillips, Meredit. "Oq-qora sinovlar bo'yicha bo'shliq". Nyu-York Tayms. Brukings instituti matbuoti. Olingan 2 oktyabr 2016.
  191. ^ Flinn 2008 yil
  192. ^ Olness 2003 yil

Bibliografiya