Qo'shma Shtatlarda protektsionizm - Protectionism in the United States

Ushbu maqolada bir nechta muammolar mavjud. Iltimos yordam bering uni yaxshilang yoki ushbu masalalarni muhokama qiling munozara sahifasi. (Ushbu shablon xabarlarini qanday va qachon olib tashlashni bilib oling) Ushbu maqola bo'lishi kerak yangilangan. Iltimos, ushbu maqolani so'nggi voqealarni yoki yangi mavjud ma'lumotlarni aks ettirish uchun yangilang. (2018 yil mart) Bu maqola uchun qo'shimcha iqtiboslar kerak tekshirish. Iltimos yordam bering ushbu maqolani yaxshilang tomonidan ishonchli manbalarga iqtiboslarni qo'shish. Resurs manbasi bo'lmagan material shubha ostiga olinishi va olib tashlanishi mumkin. Manbalarni toping: "Qo'shma Shtatlarda protektsionizm"  – Yangiliklar  · gazetalar  · kitoblar  · olim  · JSTOR (2012 yil oktyabr) (Ushbu shablon xabarini qanday va qachon olib tashlashni bilib oling) (Ushbu shablon xabarini qanday va qachon olib tashlashni bilib oling)

Qo'shma Shtatlar
Ushbu maqola bir qator qismidir siyosati va hukumati AQSH
Federal hukumat Amerika Qo'shma Shtatlari Konstitutsiyasi Qonun Soliq
Qonunchilik palatasi Amerika Qo'shma Shtatlari Kongressi Vakillar palatasi Spiker Nensi Pelosi (D) Ko'pchilik rahbari Steny Xoyer (D) Ozchiliklar etakchisi Kevin Makkarti (R) Kongress okruglari Senat Prezident Mayk Pens (R) Prezident Pro Tempore Chak Grassli (R) Ko'pchilik rahbari Mitch Makkonnell (R) Ozchiliklar etakchisi Chak Shumer (D)
Ijro etuvchi Amerika Qo'shma Shtatlari Prezidenti Donald Tramp (R) Amerika Qo'shma Shtatlarining vitse-prezidenti Mayk Pens (R) Kabinet Federal idoralar Ijroiya idorasi
Sud hokimiyati Amerika Qo'shma Shtatlari Oliy sudi Bosh sudya Jon Roberts Tomas Breyer Alito Sotomayor Kagan Gorsuch Kavanaugh Barret Apellyatsiya sudlari Tuman sudlari (ro'yxat ) Boshqa sudlar
Saylovlar Prezident saylovlari Oraliq saylovlar Yildan tashqari saylovlar Asosiy saylovlar Prezident boshlang'ich tashkiloti
Siyosiy partiyalar Demokratik Respublika Uchinchi shaxslar Ozodlik Yashil
Federalizm Shtat hukumati Hokimlar Qonunchilik organlari (Ro'yxat ) Davlat sudlari Mahalliy hokimiyat
Amerika Qo'shma Shtatlari portali Boshqa mamlakatlar

Qo'shma Shtatlarda protektsionizm bu protektsionist iqtisodiy siyosat boshqa davlatlar bilan savdo qilishda tariflar va boshqa to'siqlarni o'rnatgan. Ushbu siyosat 19-asrda eng keng tarqalgan edi. Himoya qilish uchun importni cheklashga urindi Shimoliy sanoat tarmoqlari. Bunga qarshi edi Janubiy shtatlar paxta va boshqa qishloq xo'jalik mahsulotlarini eksport qilishni kengaytirish uchun erkin savdo qilishni xohlagan. Protektsionistik choralar kiritilgan tariflar va kvotalar bilan birga import qilinadigan tovarlar bo'yicha subsidiyalar o'rtasida adolatli raqobatni ta'minlash uchun va boshqa vositalar import qilinadigan mahsulotlar va mahalliy mahsulotlar.

Tarix

O'rtacha tarif stavkalari (Frantsiya, Buyuk Britaniya, AQSh)

AQShdagi o'rtacha tarif stavkalari (1821–2016)

AQSh savdo balansi va savdo siyosati (1895–2015)

Ishlab chiqarilayotgan mahsulotlar bo'yicha o'rtacha tarif stavkalari

Buyuk Britaniya birinchi bo'lib chaqaloqlar sanoatini rivojlantirish bo'yicha keng ko'lamli strategiyani muvaffaqiyatli qo'llagan. Biroq, uning eng ashaddiy foydalanuvchisi AQSh edi; bir paytlar iqtisodiy tarixchi Pol Bayrox buni chaqirgan "zamonaviy protektsionizmning vatani va qal'asi" (Iqtisodiyot va jahon tarixi: afsonalar va paradokslar, Bayrox).

Angliya dastlab Amerika mustamlakalarini sanoatlashtirishni xohlamadi va shunga muvofiq siyosat olib bordi (masalan, yuqori qo'shilgan qiymatli ishlab chiqarish faoliyatini taqiqlash). Shunday qilib, Amerika inqilobi, ma'lum darajada, bu siyosatga qarshi urush bo'lib, unda mustamlakalarning tijorat elitasi paydo bo'layotgan Atlantika iqtisodiyotida kamroq rol o'ynashga majbur bo'lishdan bosh tortdi. Mustaqillikdan so'ng, 1789 yildagi Tariflar to'g'risidagi qonun respublikaning ikkinchi qonun loyihasi bo'lib, Prezident Vashington tomonidan imzolangan bo'lib, Kongressga bir necha istisnolardan tashqari barcha importlarga 5 foizli stavka belgilashga imkon beradi.^[1]

Mamlakatni qo'lga kiritish davrida amerikalik ziyolilar va siyosatchilarning aksariyati ingliz mumtoz iqtisodchilari tomonidan ilgari surilgan erkin savdo nazariyasi ularning mamlakatiga mos kelmasligini his qilishdi. AQSh Adam Smit, Rikardo va Jan Batist Say kabi iqtisodchilarning maslahatiga qarshi chiqdi va uning sanoatini himoya qilishga urindi. AQSh Xazinasining birinchi kotibi Aleksandr Xemilton (1789-1795) va iqtisodchi Daniel Raymond birinchi nazariyotchilar edi. nemis iqtisodchisi Fridrix Listning emas, balki rivojlanayotgan sanoatning argumentini taqdim etish (Korden, 1974; Reinert, 1996). Darhaqiqat, List savdo savdosining advokati sifatida boshlangan va AQShda surgun qilinganidan keyin (1825-1830) faqat bolalar sanoatining argumentiga aylangan. (Xenderson, 1983; Reinert, 1998).

Xemilton Buyuk Britaniyaning mustamlakalarga nisbatan olib borgan siyosati Qo'shma Shtatlarni faqat qishloq xo'jaligi mahsulotlari va xom ashyo ishlab chiqaruvchilar sifatida hukm qilishidan qo'rqardi. Vashington va Xemilton siyosiy mustaqillik iqtisodiy mustaqillikka asoslangan deb ishonganlar. Ishlab chiqariladigan mahsulotlar, xususan, urush materiallari bilan ichki ta'minotni ko'paytirish milliy xavfsizlik masalasi sifatida qaraldi. Xemilton o'z ma'ruzalarida chet ellardan kelib chiqadigan raqobat va "odat kuchlari" degani, yaqinda xalqaro raqobatdosh bo'lishi mumkin bo'lgan yangi sanoat tarmoqlari ("bolalar sanoati") Qo'shma Shtatlarda ishga tushirilmasligini anglatadi, agar dastlabki yo'qotishlar kafolatlanmagan bo'lsa. hukumat yordami bilan (Konkin, 1980). Unga ko'ra, ushbu yordam import bojlari yoki kamdan-kam hollarda importni taqiqlash shaklida bo'lishi mumkin. U bojxona to'siqlarini Amerika sanoatining rivojlanishiga imkon berish va go'daklarning sanoatini, shu jumladan qisman ushbu tariflardan olinadigan imtiyozlarni (subsidiyalar) himoya qilishga yordam berishga chaqirdi. Shuningdek, u xomashyo uchun bojlar odatda past bo'lishi kerak deb hisoblagan (Dorfman va Tuguell, Amerikaning dastlabki siyosati, 1960). Xemiltonning tushuntirishicha, xorijiy raqobatni nazorat qiluvchi qoidalar sabab bo'lgan dastlabki "narxlar oshishiga" qaramay, a "mahalliy ishlab chiqarish mukammallikka erishdi ... u har doim arzonlashadi".

Kongress barcha aktyorlarga 5% stavka bojini joriy qilgan holda (1789) tarif aktini qabul qildi. (Garraty & Carnes, 2000) (Iqtisodiyot va jahon tarixi: Miflar va paradokslar, Bayrox). 1792 yildan 1812 yilgacha Angliya bilan urush o'rtasida o'rtacha tarif darajasi 12,5% atrofida qoldi. 1812 yilda urush sababli davlat xarajatlarining ko'payishi bilan kurashish uchun barcha tariflar o'rtacha 25% gacha oshirildi.

Siyosatdagi sezilarli o'zgarish 1816 yilda yuz berdi, o'shanda tariflar darajasini urush davri darajasida ushlab turish uchun yangi qonun qabul qilindi - ayniqsa, paxta, jun va temir buyumlari himoyalangan. (Korxona asri: Sanoat Amerikasining ijtimoiy tarixi, Tomas C. Koxran, Uilyam Miller, 1942), (Garraty & Carnes, 2000). Tarif tufayli gullab-yashnagan Amerikaning sanoat manfaatlari 1816 yilda 35 foizgacha ko'tarilgan edi. Jamiyat ma'qulladi va 1820 yilga kelib Amerikaning o'rtacha tariflari 40 foizgacha ko'tarildi.

Ga binoan Maykl Lind, protektsionizm Amerikaning amaldagi siyosati bo'lib, 1816 yilgi tarifni qabul qilishdan Ikkinchi Jahon urushiga qadar "faqat 1945 yilda erkin savdoga o'tish".^[2]

1846 yildan boshlab Evropada klassik liberalizm avansiga to'g'ri keladigan qisqa muddatli erkin savdo epizodi bo'lib, uning davomida Amerika bojlari tushirildi. Ammo keyinchalik bir qator tanazzullar va 1857 yildagi vahima paydo bo'ldi, natijada 1861 yilda imzolangan Prezident Jeyms Byukenendan yuqori tarif talablari paydo bo'ldi (Morril tarif).^[1]

19-asrda senator kabi davlat arboblari Genri Kley Hamiltonning mavzulari davom etdi Whig partiyasi nomi bilan "Amerika tizimi (Avraam Linkoln va tarif, R. Lutin, 1944)".

Amerika fuqarolar urushi (1861-1865) qullik masalasida hamda tarif nizolari ustida kurashgan. Mustaqillik davrida janubning agrar manfaatlari har qanday himoyaga qarshi bo'lgan, shimolning ishlab chiqarish manfaatlari esa uni saqlab qolishni xohlagan. Yangi paydo bo'lgan Respublika partiyasi boshchiligidagi Avraam Linkoln o'zini "Genri Kley tarifidagi Whig" deb atagan, erkin savdoga qat'iy qarshi chiqqan va shu davrda 44 foizli tarifni amalga oshirgan Fuqarolar urushi - qisman temir yo'l subsidiyalari va urush harakatlari uchun to'lovlarni to'lash va qulay sanoatni himoya qilish.^[3] 1847 yilda u quyidagilarni e'lon qildi: "Bizga himoya tarifini bering, shunda biz er yuzidagi eng buyuk xalqqa ega bo'lamiz".^[1]

1871 yildan 1913 yilgacha "AQShning import qilinadigan importga o'rtacha boji hech qachon 38 foizdan pastga tushmadi [va] yalpi milliy mahsulot (Yalpi ichki mahsulot) har yili 4.3 foizga o'sdi, bu Buyuk Britaniyaning erkin savdo-sotiq sur'atlaridan ikki baravar va 20-asrdagi AQSh o'rtacha ko'rsatkichidan ancha yuqori, "qayd etadi Prezident Reygan huzuridagi AQSh Xalqaro savdo komissiyasining raisi Alfred Ekkz Ken eslatmalar.

1896 yilda GOP garovga qo'yilgan Amerikaning sanoat mustaqilligining tayanchi va taraqqiyot va farovonlikning asosi bo'lgan himoya siyosatiga sodiqligimizni yangilash va ta'kidlash platformasi. Ushbu haqiqiy Amerika siyosati chet el mahsulotlariga soliq soladi va uy sanoatini rag'batlantiradi. Bu daromad yukini o'z zimmasiga oladi. chet el tovarlari; bu amerikalik ishlab chiqaruvchi uchun Amerika bozorini ta'minlaydi, amerikalik ishchi uchun ish haqining amerika standartini qo'llab-quvvatlaydi ".

Protektsionizm davri Amerika sanoatining oltin davri bo'lib, Amerikaning iqtisodiy ko'rsatkichlari eng yuqori ko'rsatkich bilan dunyoning qolgan qismidan ustun keldi. Bu davrda AQSh o'zini qishloq xo'jaligining orqa suvidan dunyodagi eng katta iqtisodiy kuchga aylantirdi.^[1]

Faqatgina Ikkinchi Jahon Urushidan keyingina AQSh o'z savdosini erkinlashtirdi (garchi Buyuk Britaniya o'n to'qqizinchi asrning o'rtalarida bo'lgani kabi).

Janubiy shtatlar

Tarixiy nuqtai nazardan, qullarni ushlab turuvchi davlatlarga ehtiyoj sezilmas edi mexanizatsiya qullar mehnatining arzonligi sababli. Ular xom ashyo bilan ta'minladilar paxta qo'llab-quvvatlagan Britaniyaga erkin savdo.

Shimoliy shtatlar

Shimoliy shtatlar ishlab chiqarish sanoatini rivojlantirishga intildi va imkon berish uchun himoya izladi yangi paydo bo'lgan Shimoliy ishlab chiqaruvchilar inglizlarning yanada murakkab raqiblari bilan raqobatlashish. 19-asr davomida AQShning etakchi siyosatchilari, shu jumladan Senator Genri Kley, ichida Hamiltonning yondashuvini qo'llab-quvvatladi Whig partiyasi nomi ostida "Amerika tizimi".

Qarama-qarshi Janubiy Demokratik partiya sanoatni himoya qilish masalasi bo'yicha qisman 1830, 1840 va 1850 yillar davomida bahsli saylovlar. Biroq, janubiy demokratlar hech qachon kuchli bo'lmagan AQSh Vakillar palatasi aholisi ko'proq Shimoliy sifatida. Shimoliy Whigs janubning achchiq qarshiligidan yuqori himoya tariflariga erishdilar. Janubiy shtatlardan biri "deb nomlangan narsani cho'ktirdi Bekor qilish inqirozi, tariflar masalasida, davlatlar federal qonunlarni e'tiborsiz qoldirish huquqiga ega ekanligini ta'kidladilar.

Asosan bekor qilish va boshqa janjallar, Whigs yiqilib, yangi paydo bo'lgan bo'shliqni qoldirdi Respublika partiyasi, boshchiligida Avraam Linkoln to'ldirilgan. O'zini "Genri Kley tarifidagi vig" deb atagan Linkoln erkin savdoga qat'iy qarshi chiqdi. U 44% tarifini amalga oshirdi Amerika fuqarolar urushi qisman bino uchun pul to'lash uchun Tinch okeani temir yo'llari, urush harakati va Amerika sanoatini himoya qilish.^[4]

Prezident Linkolnning vakolatiga binoan, shimoliy ishlab chiqarish shtatlari o'n baravar ko'p edi YaIM janub. Ushbu ustunlik bilan Shimol o'z qurolli kuchlarini og'ir va og'ir narsalar bilan ta'minlagan holda, Janubdagi qurol-yarog'ni deyarli butunlay qamal qilish orqali ochlikdan qutqarishga muvaffaq bo'ldi. artilleriya ga Genri miltiqlarni takrorladi.

Shimoliy g'alaba bilan respublikachilarning ustunligi ta'minlandi. Respublikachilar 20-asr boshlariga qadar Amerika siyosatida hukmronlik qilishni davom ettirdilar.

Prezident Uliss S. Grant aytilgan:

Asrlar davomida Angliya himoyaga suyanib, uni haddan tashqari oshirib kelgan va undan qoniqarli natijalarga erishgan. Hech shubha yo'qki, aynan shu tizim uchun u o'zining hozirgi kuchiga qarzdor. Ikki asrdan keyin Angliya erkin savdoni qabul qilishni qulay deb topdi, chunki u himoya endi unga hech narsa taklif qila olmaydi deb o'ylaydi. Xo'sh, janoblar, bizning mamlakatimiz haqidagi bilimim meni 200 yil ichida, Amerika barcha imkoniyatlardan himoyadan qutulganida, u ham erkin savdo-sotiqni qabul qiladi, degan fikrga olib keladi.^[5]

Janubiy demokratlar asta-sekin o'z partiyalarini tikladilar va Shimoliy bilan ittifoq qildilar Progressivlar. Ularning ko'pgina farqlari bor edi, ammo ikkalasi ham paydo bo'lgan korporativ ishonchlarga qarshi chiqishdi. Bu qulaylik nikohi Umumiy dushman bilan to'qnashish Demokratik partiyani kuchaytirib, ularni hokimiyat tepasida katapultatsiya qildi.

1789 yilgacha bo'lgan mustamlaka davri

Mustamlakachilik davrida, 1775 yilgacha deyarli har bir koloniya o'z tariflarini, odatda ingliz mahsulotlari uchun past stavkalar bilan undirgan. Kemalarga (tonaj asosida) soliqlar, qullarga import soliqlari, tamakiga eksport soliqlari va alkogolli ichimliklarga soliqlar mavjud edi.^[6] London hukumati siyosatida qat'iy turib oldi merkantilizm mustamlakalarda faqat ingliz kemalari savdo qilishi mumkin edi. Shunga qaramay, ba'zi amerikalik savdogarlar kontrabanda bilan shug'ullanishgan.^[7][8]

Inqilob davrida inglizlarning 1775 yildan 1783 yilgacha bo'lgan blokadasi asosan tashqi savdoni tugatdi. 1783-89 yillarda Konfederatsiya davri, har bir davlat o'z savdo qoidalarini o'rnatdi, ko'pincha qo'shni davlatlarga tariflar yoki cheklovlar qo'ydi. 1789 yilda kuchga kirgan yangi Konstitutsiyada davlatlararo bojlar yoki savdo cheklovlari, shuningdek eksportga davlat soliqlari taqiqlangan.^[9]

Dastlabki milliy davr, 1789-1828

Ning ramkalari Amerika Qo'shma Shtatlari Konstitutsiyasi federal hukumatga soliqqa vakolat berib, Kongressning vakolatiga ega ekanligini ta'kidladi "... soliqlar, bojlar, impostlar va aktsizlarni to'lash va yig'ish, qarzlarni to'lash va Qo'shma Shtatlarning umumiy mudofaasi va umumiy farovonligini ta'minlash". va shuningdek "Xorijiy xalqlar va bir qator davlatlar bilan va hind qabilalari bilan tijoratni tartibga solish." Shtatlar o'rtasidagi tariflar AQSh Konstitutsiyasida taqiqlangan va barcha mahalliy ishlab chiqarilgan mahsulotlar soliqsiz boshqa davlatga olib kirilishi yoki jo'natilishi mumkin.

Darhol talab qilinadigan daromadga javoban va Angliya bilan savdo muvozanati buzilib ketmoqda, bu esa Amerikaning go'dak sanoatini tezda vayron qiladi va o'z valyutasi millatini quritadi. Birinchi AQSh Kongressi o'tdi va Prezident Jorj Vashington imzolangan Hamilton 1789-yilgi tarif import qilingan tovarlarga boj yig'ish huquqini beruvchi. Bojxona 1860 yilgacha tarif stavkalari bo'yicha belgilangan bojlar odatda barcha federal daromadlarning taxminan 80-95 foizini tashkil etdi. Hozirgina soliqqa tortish uchun urush olib borgan (boshqa narsalar qatori) AQSh Kongressi ishonchli daromad manbai bo'lishni xohlagan, bu nisbatan sodda va yig'ish oson edi. Shuningdek, u urush paytida rivojlangan, ammo hozirda arzonroq import, ayniqsa Angliyadan olib kelinish xavfi ostida bo'lgan bolalar sanoatini himoya qilishga intildi. Tariflar va aktsizlar Amerika Qo'shma Shtatlari Konstitutsiyasida tasdiqlangan va birinchisi tomonidan tavsiya etilgan Amerika Qo'shma Shtatlari G'aznachilik kotibi, Aleksandr Xemilton 1789 yilda Federal hukumatni operatsion xarajatlarini to'lashga va AQShning Federal qarzlari va davlatlar davomida to'plangan qarzlarini to'liq qiymatida qoplash uchun etarli miqdordagi pul bilan ta'minlash uchun xorijiy importni soliqqa tortish va viski va boshqa bir qancha mahsulotlarga past aktsiz soliqlarini belgilash uchun. Inqilobiy urush. Kongress faqat bir nechta tovarlarga past aktsiz soliqlarini belgiladi, masalan, viski, ROM, tamaki, snuff va tozalangan shakar. Viskiga solinadigan soliq juda ziddiyatli va G'arbiy dehqonlarning katta norozilik namoyishlari to'plami edi Viskilar isyoni armiya boshida general Vashington tomonidan bostirilgan 1794 y. Viski aktsiz solig'i juda kam yig'ilgan va shu qadar xo'rlangan, Prezident tomonidan bekor qilingan Tomas Jefferson 1802 yilda.^[10]

Barcha tariflar turli xil bojxona stavkalari bo'lgan tovarlarning (majburiy tovarlarning) uzoq ro'yxatida va "bepul" ro'yxatdagi ba'zi tovarlarda mavjud edi. Kongress ushbu import soliqlarining jadvallarini tuzishda juda ko'p vaqt sarfladi.

Asosiy federal daromadni ta'minlaydigan tariflar bilan savdoga qo'yilgan embargo yoki dushman blokadasi vayronaga olib kelishi mumkin. Bu 1807-15 yillarda Angliyaga qarshi Amerika iqtisodiy urushi bilan bog'liq holda yuz berdi. 1807 yilda import yarmidan ko'prog'iga kamaydi va ba'zi mahsulotlar ancha qimmatga tushdi yoki sotib olinmaydigan bo'ldi. Kongress o'tdi 1807 yilgi Embargo qonuni va Jinsiy aloqaga oid bo'lmagan qonun (1809) Angliya va Frantsiya hukumatlarini qilmishlari uchun jazolash; afsuski ularning asosiy ta'siri importni yanada kamaytirishga qaratilgan edi. The 1812 yilgi urush shunga o'xshash muammolar to'plamini keltirib chiqardi, chunki AQSh savdosi yana Angliya dengiz blokadalari tomonidan cheklangan edi. Fiskal inqirozni bekor qilish natijasida ancha yomonlashdi AQShning birinchi banki, milliy bank bo'lgan. U urushdan so'ng tiklandi.^[11]

Import qilinadigan tovarlarning etishmasligi nisbatan qisqa vaqt ichida Shimoliy-Sharqda AQShning bir nechta sanoat korxonalarini qurishni boshlash uchun juda kuchli turtki berdi. To'qimachilik va mashinasozlik ayniqsa o'sdi. Urushlar paytida ko'plab yangi sanoat korxonalari tashkil etildi va foydali ish olib bordi va ularning qariyb yarmi urushlar to'xtatilgandan va normal import qayta tiklangandan so'ng muvaffaqiyatsizlikka uchradi. AQShda sanoat mahorat, innovatsion bilim va tashkilot egri chizig'ini rivojlantirmoqda.

The 1789 yildagi tarif qonuni yangi tashkil topgan Qo'shma Shtatlar uchun birinchi milliy daromad manbaini yukladi. Yangi AQSh konstitutsiyasi 1789 yilda ratifikatsiya qilingan bo'lib, faqat federal hukumatga yagona tariflarni undirish imkonini berdi. Faqatgina federal hukumat tarif stavkalarini (bojxona) belgilashi mumkin edi, shuning uchun eski davlat stavkalari tizimi yo'q bo'lib ketdi. Yangi qonun barcha importlarga 5 foizdan 15 foizgacha soliq solgan. Ushbu stavkalar, avvalambor, federal hukumatning yillik xarajatlari va davlat qarzi hamda shtatlar davomida to'plangan qarzlarini to'lash uchun daromad olish uchun mo'ljallangan edi. Amerika mustaqilligi urushi ishlab chiqarish va xorijiy davlatlardan mustaqillikni targ'ib qilish, ayniqsa mudofaa ehtiyojlari uchun. Xemilton AQShning moliyaviy ishonchini o'rnatish va ushlab turish uchun barcha inqilobiy urush qarzlarini to'liq to'lash kerak deb hisoblagan. Uning daromadidan tashqari Ishlab chiqarish to'g'risida hisobot G'aznachilik kotibi Aleksandr Xemilton tezkor sanoatlashtirish dastagi sifatida himoya tariflaridan foydalanishning keng rejasini taklif qildi. 18-asrning oxirlarida sanoat davri endigina boshlandi va Qo'shma Shtatlarda to'qimachilik sanoati kam yoki umuman yo'q edi - bu dastlabki sanoat inqilobining yuragi. Buyuk Britaniya hukumati yutqazgan Inqilobiy urush to'qimachilik mashinalarini, mashinasozlik modellarini eksport qilishni yoki ushbu mashinalar bilan tanish bo'lgan odamlarning emigratsiyasini taqiqlab, arzon va samarali to'qimachilik mahsulotlarini ishlab chiqarish bo'yicha o'zlarining yakka monopoliyasini saqlab qolishga harakat qildilar. Dastlabki Qo'shma Shtatlarda kiyim deyarli hamma asrlar davomida tikilganidek, juda ko'p vaqt sarflaydigan va qimmat jarayonlar bilan tikilgan. Britaniyada to'qimachilik mahsulotlarini ishlab chiqarishning yangi uslublari ko'pincha o'ttiz baravar arzonroq edi, shuningdek ulardan foydalanish osonroq, samaraliroq va samarali edi. Xemilton, importga qo'yilgan qat'iy boj nafaqat daromadni oshiradi, balki "himoya qiladi" va ingliz mahsulotlari bilan raqobatlasha oladigan ishlab chiqarish korxonalarini barpo etish bo'yicha dastlabki sa'y-harakatlarni subsidiyalashga yordam beradi deb ishongan.^[12]

Samuel Slater 1789 yilda Britaniyadan ko'chib keldi (noqonuniy ravishda u to'qimachilik ishlab chiqarish bilan tanish edi). Imkoniyatlarni qidirib, u paxta zavodlarini kiritishga urinishlarning muvaffaqiyatsizligi haqida eshitdi Pawtucket, Rod-Aylend. U o'z tegirmonlarini tuzatadimi yoki yo'qligini bilishga va'da bergan egalari bilan bog'lanib, agar u muvaffaqiyatga erishsa, ular unga to'liq sheriklikni taklif qilishdi. Ularning dastlabki urinishlarini yaroqsiz deb e'lon qilib, u 1790 yil yanvaridan 1790 yil dekabrgacha Qo'shma Shtatlarda birinchi operatsion to'qimachilik ishlab chiqarish korxonasini qurishga kirishdi. The Sanoat inqilobi Amerika Qo'shma Shtatlarida ishlayotgan va ishlagan. Dastlab ularning to'qimachilik mahsulotlarining narxi Britaniyaning ekvivalenti tovarlari narxidan biroz yuqoriroq edi, ammo tarif ularning dastlabki boshlang'ich sanoatini himoya qilishga yordam berdi.^[13]

Dastlab Xemilton talab qilgan yuqori protektsionizm tariflari bundan keyin qabul qilinmadi 1812 yilgi urush kabi millatchilar qachon Genri Kley va Jon C. Kalxun ko'proq federal daromad va ko'proq sanoat zarurligini ko'rdi. Urush davrida ular uy sanoati etishmovchilikni oldini olish zarurati deb e'lon qilishdi. Shimoliy-sharqda poyabzal, shlyapa, mix va boshqa oddiy buyumlarni ommaviy ishlab chiqarish uchun paydo bo'lgan kichik yangi fabrikalar egalari ham yuqori narxlarni istashdi, bu esa ularni samaraliroq ingliz ishlab chiqaruvchilaridan bir muddat himoya qiladi. Amerika savdo kemalari qo'llab-quvvatlanishi uchun Amerika kemalarida olib kiriladigan narsalarga bojxona solig'i bo'yicha 10% chegirma taqdim etildi.^[14]

Sanoatlashtirish va ommaviy ishlab chiqarish boshlangandan so'ng, yuqori va yuqori tariflarga talab ishlab chiqaruvchilar va fabrika ishchilaridan kelib tushdi. Ular o'z bizneslarini Angliya va Evropaning past ish haqi va yanada samarali zavodlaridan himoya qilishlari kerak deb hisobladilar. Deyarli har bir shimoliy kongressmen mahalliy sanoat uchun yuqori tarif stavkasini ro'yxatdan o'tkazishni xohlagan. Senator Daniel Uebster ilgari Bostonning tovarlarni import qiladigan (va past tariflarni istagan) savdogarlari vakili bo'lib, ishlab chiqarish manfaatlarini himoya qilish uchun keskin o'zgargan 1824 yilgi tarif. Mato murvatlari va temir temir uchun stavkalar, ayniqsa, Britaniya arzon ishlab chiqaruvchi bo'lgan. Kulminatsiya nuqtasi keldi 1828 yilgi tarif, bepul savdogarlar tomonidan "deb masxara qilinganJirkanchlik tariflari ", import bojxona bojlari o'rtacha 25 foizdan oshgan. Yuqori tariflarga qarshi keskin siyosiy qarshilik Janubiy Demokratlar va Janubiy Karolinadagi plantatsiyalar egalari tomonidan ishlab chiqarish sanoati kam bo'lgan va ba'zi mahsulotlarni yuqori bojlar bilan import qilgan. Ular import uchun ko'proq pul to'lashlari kerak edi. Ular ularning iqtisodiy manfaatlari nohaq yaralanayotganini da'vo qilishgan, ular federal tarifni "bekor qilishga" urinishgan va ittifoqdan ajralib chiqish haqida gapirishgan (qarang: Bekor qilish inqirozi ). Prezident Endryu Jekson u qonunni amalga oshirish uchun AQSh armiyasidan foydalanishi ma'lum bo'lsin va hech bir shtat Janubiy Karolina shtatining bekor qilish haqidagi chaqirig'ini qo'llab-quvvatlamadi. Inqirozni tugatgan kelishuvga binoan o'n yil ichida o'rtacha tarif stavkasini 15% dan 20% gacha tushirish kiritildi.^[15]

Ikkinchi partiya tizimi, 1829–1859

Tez orada tariflar asosiy siyosiy muammoga aylandi Whigs (1832-1852) va (1854 yildan keyin) Respublikachilar asosan shimoliy sanoat va tarkibiy qismlarini yuqori tariflarga va janubga ovoz berish orqali himoya qilishni xohladilar Demokratlar, juda oz sonli sanoati bo'lgan, ammo ko'plab tovarlarni chetdan olib kelgan bojlarning pastligi uchun ovoz berdi. Har bir partiya hokimiyatga kelganida Federal hukumat har doim ma'lum darajada daromadga muhtoj bo'lgan cheklovlar ostida tariflarni ko'tarish yoki tushirish uchun ovoz berdi. The Amerika Qo'shma Shtatlarining davlat qarzi 1834 yilda to'langan va Prezident Endryu Jekson, kuchli janubiy demokrat, tarif stavkalarining taxminan yarmiga qisqartirilishini nazorat qildi va taxminan 1835 yilda deyarli barcha federal aktsiz soliqlarini bekor qildi.

Genri Kley va uning Whig partiyasi, yuqori mahsuldor zavodlarga asoslangan tezkor modernizatsiyani nazarda tutib, yuqori tarifga intildi. Ularning asosiy argumentlari shundan iborat ediki, startap fabrikalari yoki "bolalar sanoati" dastlab Evropa (ingliz) ishlab chiqaruvchilariga qaraganda samarasizroq bo'ladi. Bundan tashqari, amerikalik fabrika ishchilariga evropalik raqobatchilardan ko'ra ko'proq ish haqi to'langan. Bahslar sanoat tumanlarida juda ishonchli edi. Kleyning pozitsiyasi 1828 va 1832 yilgi tarif aktlarida qabul qilingan. The Bekor qilish inqirozi Whig pozitsiyasidan qisman voz kechishga majbur qildi. Viglar 1840 va 1842 yilgi saylovlarda g'alaba qozonib, Kongress ustidan nazoratni qo'lga kiritgach, ular bilan yuqori tariflarni qayta o'rnatdilar. 1842 yilgi tarif.^[16] Ushbu munozaralarni ko'rib chiqishda Mur ularning fuqarolar urushi uchun kashfiyotchi emasligini aniqladi. Buning o'rniga ular orqaga qarab, tashqi savdo siyosati erkin savdoni yoki protektsionizmni o'z ichiga olishi kerakmi degan eski munozarani davom ettirdilar.^[17]

Walker tarifi

Demokratlar 1845 yilda saylanib, g'alaba qozondi Jeyms K. Polk prezident sifatida. Polk uzatmani muvaffaqiyatli uddaladi Walker tarifi 1846 yilda butun mamlakat qishloq va qishloq xo'jaligi fraksiyalarini past tariflar uchun birlashtirib. Ular hukumat xarajatlarini to'laydigan, ammo boshqa bo'limlar yoki iqtisodiy sektorga boshqalari hisobiga yoqimli bo'lmaydigan "daromadlar uchun tarif" darajasini izlashdi. Walker tarifi aslida Angliya va boshqalar bilan savdoni oshirdi va federal xazinaga yuqori tarifga qaraganda ko'proq daromad keltirdi. Walker tarifidagi o'rtacha tarif taxminan 25% ni tashkil etdi. Pensilvaniya va unga qo'shni shtatlardagi protektsionistlar g'azablansa, janub fuqarolar urushi oldidan past tarif stavkalarini belgilash maqsadiga erishdi.^[18]

1857 yilgi past tarif

Walker tarifi 1857 yilgacha amal qildi, partiyasiz koalitsiya ularni yana pasaytirdi 1857 yilgi tarif 18% gacha. Bu inglizlarning protektsionistlarini bekor qilishiga javob edi "Misr to'g'risidagi qonunlar ".^[19]

Janubiy demokratlar hukmronlik qilgan Kongressdagi Demokratlar 1830, 1840 va 1850 yillarda tarif qonunlarini yozdilar va qabul qildilar va stavkalarni pasaytirib turdilar, shuning uchun 1857 stavkalari taxminan 15% gacha tushdi, bu savdo-sotiqni shunchalik kuchaytirdi. daromadlar haqiqatan ham o'sdi, 1840 yilda 20 million dollardan sal ko'proq (2019 yilda 0,5 milliard dollar), 1856 yilga kelib 80 million dollardan oshdi (1,8 milliard dollar).^[20] Janubda deyarli hech qanday shikoyat yo'q edi, ammo past stavkalar ko'plab shimoliy sanoatchilar va fabrika ishchilarini g'azablantirdi, ayniqsa Pensilvaniya shtati, ularning o'sib borayotgan temir sanoatini himoya qilishni talab qildilar. The Respublika partiyasi 1854 yilda Whigs o'rnini egalladi va shuningdek sanoat o'sishini rag'batlantirish uchun yuqori tariflarni ma'qulladi; u 1860 yilgi respublika platformasining bir qismi edi.

The Morril tariflari tarif stavkalarini sezilarli darajada oshirish, janubiy senatorlar Kongressdan chiqib ketgandan keyingina ularning shtatlari ittifoqdan chiqib, respublikachilar ko'pchiligini tark etgandan keyingina mumkin bo'ldi. Unga Demokratik Prezident imzo chekdi Jeyms Byukenen 1861 yil mart oyining boshida Prezidentdan sal oldin Avraam Linkoln lavozimga kirishdi. Pensilvaniya temir fabrikalari va Nyu-England jun fabrikalari ishbilarmonlarni va ishchilarni yuqori tariflarni chaqirishga safarbar qildilar, ammo respublika savdogarlari past tariflarni xohlashdi. Yuqori tariflar himoyachilari 1857 yilda yutqazdilar, ammo 1857 yildagi iqtisodiy tanazzulni past stavkalar bilan ayblash bilan kampaniyasini kuchaytirdilar. Iqtisodchi Genri Charlz Keri Filadelfiyaning eng ochiq advokati edi Horace Greeley va uning nufuzli gazetasi Nyu-York tribunasi. O'sish 1861 yil fevral oyida janubliklar arafasida Kongressdagi o'rinlaridan iste'foga chiqqandan so'ng qabul qilindi Fuqarolar urushi.^[21][22]

So'nggi o'n yilliklarda ba'zi tarixchilar tarif masalasini urushning sababi sifatida minimallashtirishdi va 1860-61 yillarda kam odam bu narsa ular uchun markaziy ahamiyatga ega ekanligini aytdilar. 1860–61 yillarda Ittifoqni saqlab qolish uchun murosalar taklif qilingan, ammo ular tarifni o'z ichiga olmagan.^[23] Shubhasiz, 1861 yil mart oyida qabul qilingan tarifning ta'siri imzolanishidan oldin uchrashgan har qanday delegatsiyaga juda oz ta'sir qilishi mumkin edi. Bu Shimoliy sanoat tomonidan qo'llab-quvvatlangan va 1861 yilgi respublika nazoratidagi kongressning anti-agrar pozitsiyasidan dalolat beradi. Ayrim sektsionistik hujjatlarda tarif masalasi esga olinadi, garchi ta'sirli iqtisodiy qullik institutining saqlanib qolishi deyarli emas. Biroq, bir nechtasi ozodlik iqtisodchilar tarif masalasiga ko'proq ahamiyat berishadi.^[24]

1860–1912

Fuqarolar urushi

Urush paytida ancha ko'proq daromad zarur edi, shuning uchun stavkalar qayta-qayta oshirildi, masalan, hashamatli aktsiz solig'i va boylardan olinadigan daromad solig'i.^[25] Urush davrida hukumat daromadlarining katta qismi soliqlar (357 million dollar) yoki tariflar (305 million dollar) emas, balki obligatsiyalar va qarzlardan (2,6 milliard dollar) tushgan.^[26]

Morril tarif 1861 yil 12 aprelda urush boshlanishidan bir necha hafta oldin kuchga kirdi va janubda to'planmadi. The Amerika Konfederativ Shtatlari (CSA) ko'pgina buyumlar, shu jumladan ilgari Shimoldan boj olinmaydigan ko'plab buyumlar bo'yicha o'z tarifini taxminan 15% ga o'tkazdi. Ilgari davlatlar o'rtasidagi tariflar taqiqlangan edi. Konfederatlar o'zlarining hukumatlarini tariflar bilan moliyalashtirishlariga ishonishdi. Kutilayotgan tarif daromadi hech qachon paydo bo'lmadi, chunki Union Navy ularning portlarini blokirovka qildi va Union armiyasi Shimoliy shtatlar bilan savdo-sotiqlarini chekladi. Konfederatsiya Fuqarolar urushi boshlangandan boshlab 3,5 million dollarlik tarif daromadlarini yig'di va daromad olish o'rniga inflyatsiya va musodara qilishga majbur bo'ldi.^[27]

Qayta qurish davri

Tarixchi Xovard K. Beal Fuqarolar urushi davrida yuqori tariflar zarur bo'lgan, ammo urushdan keyin shimollik sanoatchilar foydasi uchun saqlanib qolgan, ular aks holda bozorlar va foydani yo'qotishi mumkin edi. Kongressni siyosiy nazoratini saqlab qolish uchun, deydi Beal, Shimoliy sanoatchilar Respublikachilar partiyasi orqali ishladilar va qo'llab-quvvatladilar Qayta qurish past tarifli janubiy oqlarni hokimiyatdan chetlashtirgan siyosat. Beale tezisi nufuzli so'rovnomada keng tarqatildi Charlz A. Soqol, Amerika tsivilizatsiyasining yuksalishi (1927).^[28][29]

1950-yillarning oxirlarida tarixchilar shimollik ishbilarmonlar tarif bo'yicha teng ravishda bo'linib, uni qo'llab-quvvatlash uchun Qayta qurish siyosatidan foydalanmayotganliklarini ko'rsatib, Beal-Beard tezisini rad etdilar.^[30][31]

Himoya siyosati

Temir va po'lat sanoati va jun sanoati Respublika partiyasini qo'llab-quvvatlash orqali yuqori tariflarni talab qiladigan (va odatda oladigan) yaxshi tashkil etilgan manfaatlar guruhlari edi. Sanoat ishchilari evropalik hamkasblariga qaraganda ancha yuqori ish haqiga ega edilar va ular bu tarifni hisobga olib, respublikachilarga ovoz berishdi.^[32]

Demokratlar, asosan, o'sib borayotgan temir sanoatini himoya qilishni istagan Pensilvaniya partiyasidagi tariflarni qo'llab-quvvatlovchi elementlar hamda yaqin atrofdagi sanoatlashgan davlatlarda yuqori tariflarni qo'llab-quvvatlash cho'ntaklari tufayli bu masalada ikkiga bo'linishdi.^[33] Ammo Prezident Grover Klivlend past tariflarni 1880-yillarning oxirlarida Demokratik partiya siyosatining markaziga aylantirdi. Uning argumenti shundaki, yuqori tariflar iste'molchilarga keraksiz va adolatsiz soliq edi. Janub va G'arb odatda past tariflarni va sanoat Sharqidagi yuqori tariflarni qo'llab-quvvatladilar.^[34] Respublika Uilyam Makkinli bu barcha guruhlar uchun farovonlik olib kelishini va'da qilgan holda yuqori tariflarning taniqli vakili edi.^[35][36]

Fuqarolar urushidan so'ng, Respublikachilar partiyasi o'z lavozimida qolganda va Janubiy demokratlar lavozimidan cheklanganligi sababli yuqori tariflar saqlanib qoldi. Himoyachilarning ta'kidlashicha, tariflar butun mamlakatga farovonlik olib keldi va hech kim jabr ko'rmadi. Shimoliy-sharq bo'ylab sanoatlashtirish jadal rivojlanib borar ekan, ba'zi demokratlar, ayniqsa, pensilvaniyaliklar yuqori tariflar bo'yicha advokatlarga aylanishdi.

Fermerlar va jun

Respublika yuqori tariflari bo'yicha advokatlar fermerlarga yuqori maoshli fabrika ishchilari oziq-ovqat mahsulotlari uchun yuqori narxlarni to'lashlari mavzusida murojaat qilishdi. Bu "uy bozori" g'oyasi edi va u shimoli-sharqdagi aksariyat dehqonlar ustidan g'alaba qozondi, ammo paxta, tamaki va bug'doyning katta qismini eksport qilgan janubiy va g'arbiy dehqonlar uchun unchalik ahamiyati yo'q edi. 1860-yillarning oxirlarida jun ishlab chiqaruvchilar (Boston va Filadelfiya yaqinida) birinchi milliy qabulxonani tashkil etishdi va bir nechta shtatlarda jun o'stiradigan dehqonlar bilan bitimlarni bekor qilishdi. Ularning qiyinligi shundaki, Buyuk Britaniya va Avstraliyadagi tezkor jun ishlab chiqaruvchilari beparvo amerikaliklarga qaraganda yuqori sifatli junni sotishgan va ingliz ishlab chiqaruvchilarining narxi amerika tegirmonlari kabi past bo'lgan. Natijada fermerlarga import qilingan jun uchun yuqori stavka - amerikalik ishlab chiqaruvchilar to'lashi kerak bo'lgan tarif - tayyor jun va kambag'al tovarlarga yuqori tarif bilan yordam beradigan jun tariflari paydo bo'ldi.^[37]

AQSh sanoat mahsuloti

Jun va junlardan tashqari, Amerika sanoati va qishloq xo'jaligi va sanoat ishchilari - 1880-yillarda dunyoda etakchi mavqega ega bo'lganligi sababli dunyoda eng samarali bo'ldi. Sanoat inqilobi. Ularga arzon import xavfi yo'q edi. Hech bir mamlakatda sanoat quvvati, katta bozor, yuqori samaradorlik va arzon narxlar yoki keng Amerika bozorida raqobatlashish uchun zarur bo'lgan murakkab tarqatish tizimi mavjud emas edi. Darhaqiqat, inglizlar o'zlarining orollariga arzonroq Amerika mahsulotlarini suv bosganini hayratda qoldirib tomosha qildilar. Wailed London Daily Mail 1900 yilda,

Amerikalik elektrotexnika mashinalari, lokomotivlar, temir relslar, shakar ishlab chiqaradigan va qishloq xo'jaligi texnikalari ishlab chiqaruvchisi, hatto hattoki statsionar dvigatellardan ham mag'lub bo'ldik, bu ingliz muhandislik sanoatining mag'rur va tayanchi.

Shunga qaramay, ba'zi amerikalik ishlab chiqaruvchilar va kasaba uyushma ishchilari yuqori tarifni saqlashni talab qilishdi. Tarif kuchlarning murakkab muvozanatini namoyish etdi. Masalan, temir yo'llar juda ko'p miqdordagi po'latni iste'mol qilar edi. Tariflar po'lat narxini qanchalik oshirgan bo'lsa, ular AQSh po'lat sanoatining quvvatlarini kengaytirish va ishlab chiqarishga o'tish uchun katta sarmoyalarini jalb qilish uchun ko'proq pul to'lashdi. Bessemer jarayoni va keyinroq ochiq o'choqli pech. 1867-1900 yillarda AQShda po'lat ishlab chiqarish 500 martadan oshib, 22000 tonnadan 11.400.000 tonnaga o'sdi va birinchi marta AQShda ishlab chiqarilgan Bessemer temir yo'llari og'ir transport ostida 18 yil davom etishi mumkin bo'lgan eski temir temir yo'lning o'rnini bosishi kerak edi. ikki yil engil xizmat ostida.^[38] Taussigning aytishicha, 1881 yilda ingliz po'lat relslari tonnasi 31 dollarga sotilgan va agar amerikaliklar ularni import qilsalar, import qilingan tonna raylari uchun 59 dollar / tonna berib, 28 dollar / tonna boj to'lashgan. Amerikalik tegirmonlar bir tonnasini 61 dollardan olishdi va katta foyda keltirdilar, keyin uni qayta ishlab chiqarish quvvati, yuqori sifatli po'latlar va samaraliroq ishlab chiqarish uchun sarfladilar.^[39] 1897 yilga kelib, temir po'lat temir yo'lining narxi Britaniyaning 21.00 dollaridagi narxiga nisbatan 19,60 dollarga tushdi, bu 7,84 dollarlik boj to'lovini hisobga olmaganda - bu tarif sanoatning raqobatdosh bo'lish vaqtini berish maqsadini bajarganligini ko'rsatdi.^[40] O'shanda AQSh po'lat sanoati Angliyaga temir yo'lning eksportchisi bo'lib, u Britaniya narxidan past bo'lgan va WW davrida men ittifoqchilarga eng yirik po'lat etkazib beruvchiga aylanganman. 1915 yildan 1918 yilgacha Amerikaning eng yirik po'lat ishlab chiqaruvchi kompaniyasi US Steel har yili Germaniya va Avstriya-Vengriyaning umumiy po'latidan ko'ra ko'proq po'lat etkazib berar edi, bu WW I davrida jami 99,700,000 tonnani tashkil etdi.^[41] Respublikachilar o'zlarining har bir kongress okruglarida norozi "yutqazuvchilar" dan ko'ra ko'proq qoniqarli "g'oliblar" bo'lishlari uchun nihoyatda murakkab kelishuvlarni muhokama qilish ustalariga aylanishdi. 1880 yildan keyingi tarif hech qanday iqtisodiy asosga ega bo'lmagan mafkuraviy yodgorlik edi.^[37]

Klivlend tarif siyosati

Demokratik Prezident Grover Klivlend bu masalani 1887 yilda yangitdan aniqlab oldi, chunki u o'zining tariflariga o'zining tabiiy buzuqligi, haqiqiy respublikachilikka qarshi bo'lganligi va yuklashni samarasiz deb topdi: "Bizning institutlarimiz nazariyasi har bir fuqaroga o'zining barcha mevalaridan to'liq bahramand bo'lishini kafolatlaydi. sanoat va korxona ... aniqki, [minimal soliqlar] dan ko'prog'ini talab qilish - bu talab qilinmaydigan tovlamachilik va Amerika adolati va adolatiga aybdor xiyonatdir. "^[42] 1888 yilgi saylov birinchi navbatda tarif masalasida kurashdi va Klivlend yutqazdi.^[43] Respublikachi kongressmen Uilyam Makkinli bahslashdi,

Erkin tashqi savdo bizning pullarimizni, ishlab chiqargan mahsulotlarimizni va bozorlarimizni boshqa xalqlarga mehnatimiz, savdogarlarimiz va dehqonlarimiz shikastlanishiga olib keladi. Himoya pulni, bozorlarni va ishlab chiqarishni o'z xalqimiz manfaati uchun uyda saqlaydi.

Demokratlar 1890 yilgi yuqori McKinley tarifiga qarshi g'ayratli kampaniya olib borishdi va o'sha yili katta yutuqlarga erishdilar; Ular 1892 yilda Klivlendni Oq uyga tikladilar. 1893 yilda boshlangan og'ir depressiya Demokratik partiyani parchalab tashladi. Klivlend va pro-biznes Burbon demokratlari ancha past tarifni talab qildi. Uning muammosi shundaki, Demokratik saylovlarda erishilgan yutuqlar sanoat okruglaridan o'z saylovchilariga foyda keltiradigan stavkalarni oshirishga tayyor bo'lgan demokrat kongressmenlarni olib keldi. The Uilson-Gorman tariflari to'g'risidagi qonun 1894 yildagi umumiy stavkalar 50 foizdan 42 foizgacha pasaygan, ammo protektsionizmga shu qadar ko'p imtiyozlar berilganki, Klivlend uni imzolashdan bosh tortgan (bu baribir qonun bo'ldi).^[44]

McKinley tarif siyosati

Prezident Teddi Ruzvelt GOP guruhini tarif masalasida ajralib turishini kuzatmoqda

Makkinli 1896 yilda og'ir kampaniya olib bordi depressiyani ijobiy hal qilish sifatida yuqori tarif bo'yicha. Har bir iqtisodiy sohani himoya qilish va farovonlikka va'da berib, u g'alaba qozondi. Respublikachilar shoshilib Dingli tarifi 1897 yilda stavkalarni 50 foiz darajasiga ko'tarish. Demokratlar bunga javoban yuqori stavkalar hukumat tomonidan homiylik qilingan "trestlar" (monopoliyalar) ni yaratdi va iste'mol narxlarining ko'tarilishiga olib keldi. McKinley yana katta miqdordagi ko'chkidan qayta tanlanib, o'zaro savdo shartnomalarining tarifdan keyingi davri haqida gapira boshladi. O'zaro munosabat hech qaerga ketmadi; MakKinlining qarashlari yarim asrga juda erta edi.^[45] Respublikachilar achchiq tarzda bo'linib ketishdi Peyn-Aldrich tariflari 1909 yil. Respublika Prezidenti Teodor Ruzvelt (1901-1909) tarif masalasi uning partiyasini buzib tashlaganini ko'rdi, shuning uchun u har qanday ko'rib chiqishni qoldirdi. Respublikachilar nazorati ostida nozik muvozanat bir-biridan ajralib ketdi Uilyam Xovard Taft. U 1908 yilda prezidentlik uchun "islohotlar" uchun targ'ibot o'tkazdi, bu hamma hamma past stavkalarni anglatishini taxmin qildi. Vakillar palatasi Payne Bill bilan stavkalarni tushirdi, keyin uni Senatga yubordi Nelson Uilmart Aldrich mobilized high-rate Senators. Aldrich was a New England businessman and a master of the complexities of the tariff, the Midwestern Republican insurgents were rhetoricians and lawyers who distrusted the special interests and assumed the tariff was "sheer robbery" at the expense of the ordinary consumer. Rural America believed that its superior morality deserved special protection, while the dastardly immorality of the trusts—and cities generally—merited financial punishment. Aldrich baited them. Did the insurgents want lower tariffs? His wickedly clever Peyn-Aldrich tariflari to'g'risidagi qonun of 1909 lowered the protection on Midwestern farm products, while raising rates favorable to his Northeast.^[46][47]

By 1913 with the new income tax generating revenue, the Democrats in Congress were able to reduce rates with the Underwood tarifi. The outbreak of war in 1914 made the impact of tariffs of much less importance compared to war contracts. When the Republicans returned to power the returned the rates to a high level in the Fordni - Makkumer tarifi of 1922. The next raise came with the Smoot-Hawley tariflari to'g'risidagi qonun of 1930 at the start of the Great Depression.

Tariff with Canada

The Kanada-Amerika o'zaro kelishuv shartnomasi increased trade between 1855 and its ending in 1866. When it ended Canada turned to tariffs. The Milliy siyosat was a Canadian economic program introduced by Jon A. Makdonald "s Konservativ partiya in 1879 after it returned to power. It had been an official policy, however, since 1876. It was based on high tariffs to protect Canada's manufacturing industry. Macdonald campaigned on the policy in the 1878 yilgi saylov, and handily beat the Liberal partiya, which supported free trade.

Efforts to restore free trade with Canada collapsed when Canada rejected a proposed reciprocity treaty in fear of Amerika imperializmi ichida 1911 yilgi federal saylov. Taft negotiated a reciprocity agreement with Canada, that had the effect of sharply lowering tariffs. Democrats supported the plan but Midwestern Republicans bitterly opposed it. Barnstorming the country for his agreement, Taft undiplomatically pointed to the inevitable integration of the North American economy, and suggested that Canada should come to a "parting of the ways" with Britain. Canada's Conservative Party, under the leadership of Robert Borden, now had an issue to regain power from the low-tariff Liberals; after a surge of pro-imperial anti-Americanism, the Conservatives won. Ottawa rejected reciprocity, reasserted the National Policy and went to London first for new financial and trade deals. The Payne Aldrich Tariff of 1909 actually changed little and had slight economic impact one way or the other, but the political impact was enormous. The insurgents felt tricked and defeated and swore vengeance against Wall Street and its minions Taft and Aldrich. The insurgency led to a fatal split down the middle in 1912 as the GOP lost its balance wheel.^[48]

1913 to present

Vudro Uilson made a drastic lowering of tariff rates a major priority for his presidency. 1913 yil Underwood tarifi cut rates, but the coming of Birinchi jahon urushi in 1914 radically revised trade patterns. Reduced trade and, especially, the new revenues generated by the federal daromad solig'i (bolstered by the ratification of the O'n oltinchi o'zgartirish in 1913) made tariffs much less important in terms of economic impact and political rhetoric.

The Wilson administration desired a 'revamping' of the current banking system, "...so that the banks may be the instruments, not the masters, of business and of individual enterprise and initiative.".^[49] President Wilson achieved this in the Federal zaxira to'g'risidagi qonun of 1913. Working with the bullish Senator Aldrich and former presidential candidate William Jennings Bryan, he perfected a way to centralize the banking system to allow Congress to closely allocate paper money production.^[50] The Federal Reserve Act, with the Sixteenth Amendment of the Constitution, would create a trend of new forms of government funding.

When the Republicans regained power after the war they restored the usual high rates, with the Fordni - Makkumer tarifi of 1922. When the Katta depressiya hit, international trade shrank drastically. The crisis baffled the GOP, and it tried to raise tariffs again with the Smoot-Hawley tariflari to'g'risidagi qonun of 1930. This time it backfired, as Canada, Britain, Germany, France and other industrial countries retaliated with their own tariffs and special, bilateral trade deals. American imports and exports both went into a tailspin. Franklin D. Ruzvelt and the New Dealers made promises about lowering tariffs on a reciprocal country-by-country basis (which they did), hoping this would expand foreign trade (which it did not.) Frustrated, they gave much more attention to domestic remedies for the depression; by 1936 the tariff issue had faded from politics, and the revenue it raised was small. In World War II, both tariffs and reciprocity were insignificant compared to trade channeled through Qarz berish.^[51]

Tariffs and Great Depression

Most economists hold the opinion that the tariff act did not greatly worsen the great depression:

Milton Fridman also held the opinion that the Smoot-Hawley tariff of 1930 did not cause the Great Depression. Douglas A. Irwin writes : "most economists, both liberal and conservative, doubt that Smoot Hawley played much of a role in the subsequent contraction."^[52]

William Bernstein writes "most economic historians now believe that only a minuscule part of that huge loss of both world GDP and the United States' GDP can be ascribed to the tariff wars "because trade was only nine percent of global output, not enough to account for the seventeen percent drop in GDP following the Crash. He thinks the damage done could not possibly have exceeded 2 percent of world GDP and tariff "didn't even significantly deepen the Great Depression."^[53]

Piter Temin, explains a tariff is an expansionary policy, like a devaluation as it diverts demand from foreign to home producers. He notes that exports were 7 percent of GNP in 1929, they fell by 1.5 percent of 1929 GNP in the next two years and the fall was offset by the increase in domestic demand from tariff. He concludes that contrary the popular argument, contractionary effect of the tariff was small. (Temin, P. 1989. Katta depressiyadan saboqlar, MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass)^[54]

Nobel mukofoti sovrindori Moris Allais, thinks that tariff was rather helpful in the face of deregulation of competition in the global labor market and excessively loose credit prior to the Crash which, according to him, caused the crisis Financial and banking sectors. He notes higher trade barriers were partly a means to protect domestic demand from deflation and external disturbances. He observes domestic production in the major industrialized countries fell faster than international trade contracted; if contraction of foreign trade had been the cause of the Depression, he argues, the opposite should have occurred. So, the decline in trade between 1929 and 1933 was a consequence of the Depression, not a cause. Most of the trade contraction took place between January 1930 and July 1932, before the introduction of the majority of protectionist measures, excepting limited American measures applied in the summer of 1930. It was the collapse of international liquidity that caused of the contraction of trade.^[55]

Savdoni erkinlashtirish

Tariffs up to the Smoot-Hawley tariflari to'g'risidagi qonun of 1930, were set by Congress after many months of testimony and negotiations. In 1934, the U.S. Congress, in a rare delegation of authority, passed the O'zaro tariflar to'g'risidagi qonun of 1934, which authorized the executive branch to negotiate bilateral tariff reduction agreements with other countries. The prevailing view then was that trade liberalization may help stimulate economic growth. However, no one country was willing to liberalize unilaterally. Between 1934 and 1945, the executive branch negotiated over 32 bilateral trade liberalization agreements with other countries. The belief that low tariffs led to a more prosperous country are now the predominant belief with some exceptions. Multilateralism is embodied in the seven tariff reduction rounds that occurred between 1948 and 1994. In each of these "rounds", all Tariflar va savdo bo'yicha bosh kelishuv (GATT) members came together to negotiate mutually agreeable trade liberalization packages and reciprocal tariff rates. In the Uruguay round in 1994, the Jahon savdo tashkiloti (WTO) was established to help establish uniform tariff rates.

Presently only about 30% of all import goods are subject to tariffs in the United States, the rest are on the free list. The "average" tariffs now charged by the United States are at a historic low. The list of negotiated tariffs are listed on the Uyg'unlashtirilgan tariflar jadvali as put out by the Amerika Qo'shma Shtatlarining xalqaro savdo komissiyasi.^[56]

Ikkinchi jahon urushidan keyin

After the war the U.S. promoted the Tariflar va savdo bo'yicha bosh kelishuv (GATT) established in 1947, to minimize tariffs and other restrictions, and to liberalize trade among all capitalist countries. In 1995 GATT became the Jahon savdo tashkiloti (JST); with the collapse of Communism its open markets/low tariff ideology became dominant worldwide in the 1990s.

American industry and labor prospered after World War II, but hard times set in after 1970. For the first time there was stiff competition from low-cost producers around the globe. Many rust belt industries faded or collapsed, especially the manufacture of steel, TV sets, shoes, toys, textiles and clothing. Toyota va Nissan threatened the giant domestic auto industry. In the late 1970s Detroit and the auto workers union combined to fight for protection. They obtained not high tariffs, but a voluntary restriction of imports Yaponiya hukumatidan. Quotas were two-country diplomatic agreements that had the same protective effect as high tariffs, but did not invite retaliation from third countries. By limiting the number of Japanese automobiles that could be imported, quotas inadvertently helped Japanese companies push into larger, and more expensive market segments. The Japanese producers, limited by the number of cars they could export to America, opted to increase the value of their exports to maintain revenue growth. This action threatened the American producers' historical hold on the mid- and large-size car markets.^[57]

Under the Eisenhower, Kennedy, Johnson and Nixon administrations, increasing numbers of Voluntary Export Restraint agreements were also secured with Japan, South Korea, Taiwan, Hong Kong and European countries to avert the application of trade barriers by the US. Products subjected to quotas included textiles, plywood, sewing machines, flatware, tuna, woodscrews, steel, steel and iron products, glass, footwear, and electronics.^[58]

The tovuq solig'i was a 1964 response by President Lyndon B. Jonson to tariffs placed by Germany (then West Germany) on importation of US chicken. Beginning in 1962, during the President Kennedi administration, the US accused Europe of unfairly restricting imports of American poultry at the request of West German chicken farmers. Diplomacy failed, and in January 1964, two months after taking office, President Johnson retaliated by imposing a 25 percent tax on all imported light trucks. This directly affected the German built Volkswagen mikroavtobuslari. Officially it was explained that the light trucks tax would offset the dollar amount of imports of Volkswagen vans from West Germany with the lost American sales of chickens to Europe. But audio tapes from the Johnson White House reveal that in January 1964, President Johnson was attempting to convince Birlashgan avtoulov ishchilari prezident Uolter Reuter, not to initiate a strike just prior the 1964 election and to support the president's civil rights platform. Reuther in turn wanted Johnson to respond to Volkswagen's increased shipments to the United States.^[59]

1980-yillarga qadar

China gained entry to the JST kabi Eng maqbul millat 2000-yillarning boshlarida.

Davomida Reygan and George H. W. Bush administrations Republicans abandoned protectionist policies, and came out against quotas and in favor of the GATT/WTO policy of minimal economic barriers to global trade. Free trade with Canada came about as a result of the Kanada - AQSh Erkin savdo shartnomasi of 1987, which led in 1994 to the Shimoliy Amerika erkin savdo shartnomasi (NAFTA). It was based on Reagan's plan to enlarge the scope of the market for American firms to include Canada and Mexico. Prezident Bill Klinton, with strong Republican support in 1993, pushed NAFTA through Congress over the vehement objection of labor unions.^[60][61]

Likewise, in 2000 Clinton worked with Republicans to give China entry into WTO and "eng maqbul millat " trading status (i.e., the same low tariffs promised to any other WTO member). NAFTA and WTO advocates promoted an optimistic vision of the future, with prosperity to be based on intellectuals skills and managerial know-how more than on routine hand labor. They promised that free trade meant lower prices for consumers. Opposition to liberalized trade came increasingly from labor unions, who argued that this system also meant lower wages and fewer jobs for American workers who could not compete against wages of less than a dollar an hour. The shrinking size and diminished political clout of these unions repeatedly left them on the losing side.^[57]

Ularning katta qismi kuzatuv ishlari have found that voters' economic hardships influence their support of protectionism. Bu tasdiqlangan 2016 yil AQSh prezident saylovi, in which Donald Trump was broadly supported in the Zang kamari. Biroq, experimental studies find that support for protectionism is not sufficiently, or even necessarily, related to an individual's economic circumstances, but instead is deeply rooted in domestic politics.^[62]

Despite overall decreases in international tariffs, some tariffs have been more resistant to change. For example, due partially to tariff pressure from the European Umumiy qishloq xo'jaligi siyosati, US agricultural subsidies have seen little decrease over the past few decades, even in the face of recent pressure from the WTO during the latest Doha talks.^[63]

Support among American politicians

Savdolarni importga ochish Pa dan Pwgacha narxni pasaytiradi va Qa dan Ct gacha oshiradi. Bu ortadi iste'molchilarning ortiqcha qismi (talab egri chizig'idagi maydon, lekin narxdan yuqori), chunki iste'molchilar ko'proq tovarlarni arzon narxlarda sotib olishlari mumkin. Biroq, bu ham kamayadi ishlab chiqaruvchilarning profitsiti (ta'minot egri chizig'idan yuqori, ammo narxdan past bo'lgan maydon) X ga teng, chunki mahalliy ishlab chiqaruvchilar kamroq tovarlarni arzon narxlarda etkazib berishadi. Mahalliy ishlab chiqaruvchilar Qt va Ct o'rtasidagi miqdordagi farqni import bilan to'ldirgan holda Qtda ishlab chiqarishni tanlaydilar. Erkin savdodan olingan umumiy daromad Z maydonidir, garchi g'oliblar (iste'molchilar) va yutqazganlar (mahalliy firmalar va ularning xodimlari) mavjud.^[64]

Mahalliy ishlab chiqaruvchilarga qaraganda ko'proq iste'molchilarga zarar etkazadigan import tariflari ta'sirini aks ettiruvchi diagramma. Narxlarning yuqoriligi va past miqdorlarning pasayishi iste'molchilarning ortiqcha qismi (narx ustidagi maydon, ammo talab egri chizig'ida) A + B + C + D maydonlari bo'yicha kengaymoqda ishlab chiqaruvchilarning profitsiti (the area below price but above the supply curve) by A and government revenue by C (the import quantity times the tariff price.) Areas B and D are vazn yo'qotish, iste'molchilar tomonidan yo'qotilgan ortiqcha va umuman.^[64]

From 1871 to 1913, "the average U.S. tariff on dutiable imports never fell below 38 percent [and] gross national product (GNP) grew 4.3 percent annually, twice the pace in free trade Britain and well above the U.S. average in the 20th century," eslatmalar Alfred Eckes Jr., chairman of the U.S. International Trade Commission under President Reagan.

1896 yilda GOP platformasi garovga qo'yilgan "Amerika sanoat mustaqilligi va taraqqiyot va farovonlikning asosi sifatida himoya siyosatiga sodiqligimizni yangilash va ta'kidlash. Ushbu haqiqiy Amerika siyosati chet el mahsulotlariga soliq soladi va uy sanoatini rag'batlantiradi. Bu daromad yukini chet el tovarlariga yuklaydi Amerika ishlab chiqaruvchisi uchun Amerika bozorini ta'minlaydi, amerikalik ishchi uchun ish haqining Amerika standartini qo'llab-quvvatlaydi. "

Jorj Vashington

"I use no porter or cheese in my family, but such as is made in America," the inaugural President Jorj Vashington yozgan, boasting that these domestic products are "of an excellent quality."

One of the first acts of Congress Washington signed was a tariff among whose stated purpose was "the encouragement and protection of manufactures."^{[iqtibos kerak ]}

In his 1790 Ittifoq manzili, Washington justified his tariff policy for national security reasons:

A free people ought not only to be armed, but disciplined; to which end a uniform and well-digested plan is requisite; and their safety and interest require that they should promote such manufactories as tend to render them independent of others for essential, particularly military, supplies^[65]

Tomas Jefferson

As President Tomas Jefferson wrote in explaining why his views had evolved to favor more protectionist policies: "In so complicated a science as political economy, no one axiom can be laid down as wise and expedient for all times and circumstances, and for their contraries."^[66]

Keyin 1812 yilgi urush, Jefferson's position began to resemble that of Washington, that some level of protection was necessary to secure the nation's political independence. U aytdi:

experience has taught me that manufactures are now as necessary to our independence as to our comfort: and if those who quote me as of a different opinion will keep pace with me in purchasing nothing foreign where an equivalent of domestic fabric can be obtained, without regard to difference of price^[67][66]

Genri Kley

In 1832, then Amerika Qo'shma Shtatlari senatori dan Kentukki, Genri Kley said about his disdain for "free traders" that "it is not free trade that they are recommending to our acceptance. It is in effect, the British colonial system that we are invited to adopt; and, if their policy prevail, it will lead substantially to the re-colonization of these States, under the commercial dominion of Great Britain."^[68]

Clay said:

When gentlemen have succeeded in their design of an immediate or gradual destruction of the American System, what is their substitute? Free trade! Free trade! The call for free trade is as unavailing as the cry of a spoiled child, in its nurse's arms, for the moon, or the stars that glitter in the firmament of heaven. It never has existed; it never will exist. Trade implies, at least two parties. To be free, it should be fair, equal and reciprocal.

Clay explained that "equal and reciprocal" free trade "never has existed; [and] it never will exist." He warned against practicing "romantic trade philanthropy ... which invokes us to continue to purchase the produce of foreign industry, without regard to the state or prosperity of our own." Gil made clear that he was "utterly and irreconcilably opposed" to trade which would "throw wide open our ports to foreign productions" without reciprocation.

Endryu Jekson

Henry Clay's longtime rival and political opponent, President Endryu Jekson, in explaining his support for a tariff, wrote:

We have been too long subject to the policy of the British merchants. It is time we should become a little more Americanized, and, instead of feeding the paupers and laborers of Europe, feed our own, or else, in a short time, by continuing our present policy, we shall all be paupers ourselves.

Jeyms Monro

In 1822, President Jeyms Monro observed that "whatever may be the abstract doctrine in favor of unrestricted commerce," the conditions necessary for its success—reciprocity and international peace—"has never occurred and can not be expected." Monroe said, "strong reasons ... impose on us the obligation to cherish and sustain our manufactures."^[69]

Avraam Linkoln

Prezident Avraam Linkoln declared, "Give us a protective tariff and we will have the greatest nation on earth." Lincoln warned that "the abandonment of the protective policy by the American Government ... must produce want and ruin among our people."

Lincoln similarly said that, "if a duty amount to full protection be levied upon an article" that could be produced domestically, "at no distant day, in consequence of such duty," the domestic article "will be sold to our people cheaper than before."^[70]

Additionally, Lincoln argued that based on economies of scale, any temporary increase in costs resulting from a tariff would eventually decrease as the domestic manufacturer produced more.

Lincoln did not see a tariff as a tax on low-income Americans because it would only burden the consumer according to the amount the consumer consumed. By the tariff system, the whole revenue is paid by the consumers of foreign goods ... the burthen of revenue falls almost entirely on the wealthy and luxurious few, while the substantial and laboring many who live at home, and upon home products, go entirely free.^[70]

Lincoln argued that a tariff system was less intrusive than domestic taxation: The tariff is the cheaper system, because the duties, being collected in large parcels at a few commercial points, will require comparatively few officers in their collection; while by the direct tax system, the land must be literally covered with assessors and collectors, going forth like swarms of Egyptian locusts, devouring every blade of grass and other green thing.^[71]

Uilyam Makkinli

Prezident Uilyam Makkinli supported tariffs and rejected the "cheaper is better" argument:^[72]

Erkin savdo sharoitida savdogar xo'jayin va ishlab chiqaruvchi quldir. Himoya faqat tabiat qonuni, o'zini saqlab qolish, o'zini rivojlantirish, inson irqining eng yuqori va eng yaxshi taqdirini ta'minlash qonuni. [It is said] that protection is immoral. ... Why, if protection builds up and elevates 63,000,000 [the U.S. population] of people, the influence of those 63,000,000 of people elevates the rest of the world. We cannot take a step in the pathway of progress without benefiting mankind everywhere.^[73]

They [free traders] say, 'Buy where you can buy the cheapest.' That is one of their maxims ... Of course, that applies to labor as to everything else. Sizga bundan ming baravar yaxshiroq bo'lgan maksimal qiymatni berishga ijozat bering va bu himoya maksimumi: "Eng oson to'laydigan joyni sotib oling". And that spot of earth is where labor wins its highest rewards."They say, if you had not the Protective Tariff things would be a little cheaper. Well, whether a thing is cheap or whether it is dear depends on what we can earn by our daily labor. Free trade cheapens the product by cheapening the producer. Protection cheapens the product by elevating the producer."^[74]

"The protective tariff policy of the Republicans ... has made the lives of the masses of our countrymen sweeter and brighter, and has entered the homes of America carrying comfort and cheer and courage. It gives a premium to human energy, and awakens the noblest aspiration in the breasts of men. Our own experience shows that it is the best for our citizenship and our civilization and that it opens up a higher and better destiny for our people."^[75]

[Free trade] destroys the dignity and independence of American labor ... It will take away from the people of this country who work for a living—and the majority of them live by the sweat of their faces—it will take from them heart and home and hope. It will be self-destruction."^[76]

Teodor Ruzvelt

Prezident Teodor Ruzvelt believed that America's economic growth was due to the protective tariffs, which helped her industrialize. He acknowledged this in his State of the Union address from 1902:

The country has acquiesced in the wisdom of the protective-tariff principle. It is exceedingly undesirable that this system should be destroyed or that there should be violent and radical changes therein. Our past experience shows that great prosperity in this country has always come under a protective tariff.^[77]

Donald Tramp

2017 yilda AQSh savdo defitsiti (milliardlarda, tovar va xizmatlarda) mamlakatlar bo'yicha

Commentators and news outlets have largely called President Donald Tramp 's economic policies protectionist and generally opposed to free trade.^[78][79][80] Yilda his first address to a joint session of Congress, Trump said:

Currently, when we ship products out of America, many other countries make us pay very high tariffs and taxes. But when foreign companies ship their products into America, we charge them nothing, or almost nothing ... I believe strongly in free trade but it also has to be fair trade.^[81]

Globalization and sociological effects in U.S.

Yilda The Revolt of the Elites and the Betrayal of Democracy, Kristofer Lasch tahlil qiladi^[82] the widening gap between the top and bottom of the social composition in the United States. For him, our epoch is determined by a social phenomenon: the revolt of the elites.In reference to The Revolt of the Masses (1929) of the Spanish philosopher Xose Ortega va Gasset, Christopher Lasch concludes: "In the past, it was the "revolt of the masses" that was seen as the threat to the social order .... Today, however, the main threat seems to come from those at the top of the social hierarchy and not from the masses." According to Lasch, the new elites, i.e., those who are in the top 20% in terms of income, through to globalization, which allows total mobility of capital, no longer live in the same world as their fellow citizens. In this, they oppose the old bourgeoisie of the nineteenth and twentieth centuries, which was constrained by its spatial stability to a minimum of rooting and civic obligations.

Globalization, according to the sociologist, has turned elites into tourists in their own countries. The de-nationalisation of society tends to produce a class who see themselves as "world citizens, but without accepting ... any of the obligations that citizenship in a polity normally implies". Their ties to an international culture of work, leisure, information - make many of them deeply indifferent to the prospect of national decline. Instead of financing public services and the public treasury, new elites are investing their money in improving their voluntary ghettos: private schools in their residential neighborhoods, private police, garbage collection systems. They have "withdrawn from common life".

Composed of those who control the international flows of capital and information, who preside over philanthropic foundations and institutions of higher education, manage the instruments of cultural production and thus fix the terms of public debate. So, the political debate is limited mainly to the dominant classes and political ideologies lose all contact with the concerns of the ordinary citizen. The result of this is that no one has a likely solution to these problems and that there are furious ideological battles on related issues. However, they remain protected from the problems affecting the working classes: the decline of industrial activity, the resulting loss of employment, the decline of the middle class, increasing the number of the poor, the rising crime rate, growing drug trafficking, the urban crisis. The result of this split from the top of the scale is that no one has a likely solution to these inextricable problems and that there are furious ideological battles on related issues. At the same time, "middle Americans, as they appear to the makers of educated opinion, are hopelessly shabby, unfashionable, and provincial, ill-informed about changes in taste or intellectual trends".

Public opinion on protectionism and free trade

Opinions on trade and protectionism have fluctuated since the early 2000s. Opinions recently have decided roughly of partisan lines. While 67% of Democrats believing free trade agreements are good for the Qo'shma Shtatlar, only 36% of Republicans agree.^[83] When asked if free trade has helped respondents specifically, the approval numbers for Democrats drop to 54%, however approval ratings among republicans remain relatively unchanged at 34%.^[83] The 2016 election marked the beginning of the trend of returning to protectionism, an ideology incorporated into Donald Tramp platformasi. During the Republican primary, Trump voters had a much more positive view of protectionism and "economic nationalism" than Kruz yoki Kasich saylovchilar.^[84] However, after the election there seems to have been a push-back against such sentiments, with an uptick in support for free trade agreements in both parties,^[83] with 72% of respondents saying international trade was an opportunity, not a threat.^[85] Scholars, such as Michael J. Hiscox, have argued that public opinion of international trade and protectionism is particularly malleable to political framing because of the complexity of the issue. Due to this complexity, the public is more likely to look to the elites in their own political parties to form their opinions.^[86]

From 2005 to 2018, American favorability towards NAFTA increased at a relatively stable rate,^[87] with 48% of people believing the deal has been good for the United States in 2018 compared to only 38% in 2005.^[1]

Shuningdek qarang

• Iqtisodiy millatchilik
• Amerika tizimi (iqtisodiy reja)
• Amerika Qo'shma Shtatlari tarixidagi tariflar
• Biznes millatchiligi

Adabiyotlar