Armaniston-Turkiya munosabatlari - Armenia–Turkey relations

Armaniston-Turkiya munosabatlari
Armaniston va Turkiyaning joylashuvi ko'rsatilgan xaritada

Armaniston
kurka

Armaniston-Turkiya munosabatlari rasmiy ravishda mavjud emas va tarixiy jihatdan dushmanlik qilgan.[1] Turkiya tan olgan bo'lsa-da Armaniston (chegaralarida Armaniston Sovet Sotsialistik Respublikasi 1991 yil sentyabr oyida mustaqillik e'lon qilinganidan ko'p o'tmay, ikki mamlakat o'rtasida diplomatik aloqalar o'rnatilmagan. 1993 yilda Turkiya Tog'li Qorabog'dagi urush uni yopish orqali chegara bilan Armaniston uchun qo'llab-quvvatlamaydi Ozarbayjon.

2008-2009 yillarda mamlakatlar o'zaro munosabatlarda qisqa vaqt ichida muzdan tushgan va 2009 yil oktyabr oyida tomonlar o'zaro imzolashgan normallashtirish protokollari.[2][3][4] Biroq, protokollar hech qachon ratifikatsiya qilinmagan va keyingi yilda yaqinlashish yakunlandi;[5][6] protokollar Armaniston tomonidan rasmiy ravishda 2018 yil mart oyida bekor qilingan.[7][8]

Tarix

O'rta Osiyodan Anatoliyaga turkiylarning ko'chishi va imperiyaning paydo bo'lishi

Qo'shimcha ma'lumotlar: Anadolu tarixi va Turkiy ko'chish

1071 yilda Saljuqiy turklar mag'lub bo'ldi Vizantiya imperiyasi va uning imperatorini asirga oldi Manzikert jangi. Natijada yuzaga kelgan tartibsizliklarda turklar Vizantiya Anadolining katta qismini osongina bosib olishdi. Vizantiyaning qayta zabt etilishi va vaqti-vaqti bilan salib qo'shinlari ko'rinishidagi g'arbiy istilolariga qaramay, bir qator turk davlatlari tashkil topdi. Anadolu. Ushbu turkiy qabilalar janubning oxiriga kelib sayohat qilishgan Kaspiy dengizi ko'pincha, va shuning uchun so'riladi va uzatiladi Islomiy kabi boshqa turklardan farqli o'laroq madaniyat va tsivilizatsiya Kumanlar, qisman g'arblashgan va nasroniylashgan. Aholining ustunligi bilan[iqtibos kerak ] va tashkilot, mintaqaviy hokimiyat tabiiy ravishda turkiy tilda so'zlashuvchi aholi qo'liga o'tdi. Mintaqasidan ko'plab turkiy xalqlar qochib kirib kelgan Mo'g'ul bosqinlar va boshqalar keyinchalik mo'g'ul qo'shinlari safida jang qilayotgan askarlar sifatida kirib keldi. Turkiy islomlashgan aholi, shuningdek, keksa yoshdagi aholining ko'p qismini o'ziga singdirgan Kichik Osiyo jumladan, yunonlar va armanlar islom dini va turkiy tilga o'tib, chegara jamiyatini yaratdilar.[iqtibos kerak ] Arman jamoalari asrlar davomida nisbatan toqatli Usmonlilar hukmronligi ostida yoki shaharlarda ozchilik aholi sifatida yoki faqat qishloq joylarda faqat arman shaharlari sifatida rivojlanishda davom etishdi. Kabi shaharlarda Istanbul va Izmir, Armanlar ayniqsa muhim rollarni ijro etishgan; yilda 1851 hisobot The New York Times Masalan, armanliklar o'sha paytdagi Istanbul aholisining qariyb to'rtdan bir qismini tashkil etganligini, 200 mingdan ortiq aholisi bo'lganligidan dalolat beradi.[9]

X asrdan boshlab 1915 yildan beri tark qilingan Armaniston Muqaddas Xoch sobori kuni Axtamar oroli 2006 yilda Turkiya Madaniyat vazirligi tomonidan to'lanadigan munozarali restavratsiyadan o'tgan.[10]

Usmonli imperiyasining tanazzuli davrida Armaniston-Turkiya munosabatlari

Hamidlar hukmronligi

Gacha bo'lgan yarim asr davomida Birinchi jahon urushi, Armaniston aholisi Anadolu tobora siyosiy faollashdi va o'z navbatida Sulton davrida tobora shafqatsiz ta'qiblarga dosh berdi Abdul Hamid II. Usmonli imperiyasi tanazzulga uchraganligi sababli, uning siyosiy rahbariyati Armaniston aholisiga tobora kuchayib borayotgan va beparvolik bilan qilingan hujumlarga ruxsat bergan yoki ularga toqat qilgan, bu Anadoludagi missionerlik jamoalari bir qancha keng miqyosli armanlarning qirg'inlariga guvoh bo'lgan turli G'arb davlatlarining qattiq tanqidlariga sabab bo'lgan. 1894 yildan 1896 yilgacha Sulton 300 minggacha armani o'ldirishni buyurdi,[11] natijada kamida 50 ming arman etimlari,[12] ichida Hamidian qirg'inlari, keyinchalik ular tomonidan tasvirlangan BBC muxbir Kris Morris yilda Yangi Turkiya (Granta kitoblari, 2005 ) "1915 yildagi dahshatli voqealar belgisi" sifatida.[13]

Xristian va yahudiy, katolik va protestant, evropalik va amerikalik yuzlab va minglab aqlli odamlarning bir vaqtda va to'plangan guvohligi, asrlar davomida misli ko'rilmagan begunoh odamlarning qirg'ini Turkiyaning Armaniston viloyatlarida amalga oshirilganligiga aniq ishonch hosil qildi. The New York Times 1896 yil 25-yanvar

Hamidian qirg'inlaridan so'ng, Usmonli Bankni hibsga olish o'sha yili arman inqilobchilari tomonidan, ehtimol, Usmonli imperiyasi armanlari nomidan G'arbning aralashuvi uchun sodda iltimosnoma, armiyalarni hamidiylar tomonidan ta'qib qilinishiga sabab bo'ldi. Bankga hujum qilganlar oxir-oqibat imperiyadan chiqib ketish huquqiga ega bo'ldilar, ammo Armaniston aholisi zo'ravonlikka duchor bo'lishdi. sulton bankka hujum qilgan inqilobchilar va bank o'rtasida hech qanday farq qilmadi Nasroniy umuman aholi.

Keyingi zo'ravonliklar bir qator davlatlar rahbarlarini, shu jumladan, qoralashga sabab bo'ldi Amerika Prezident Grover Klivlend, Anatoliyadagi "qonli qassoblikni" qoralagan. Armanilarga qarshi zo'ravonlik hukumat tomonidan qay darajada tashkil etilgani noma'lum bo'lsa-da, Klivlend nutqida "qirg'in va talonchilik ishlarida turk askarlarining haqiqiy ishtiroki to'g'risida kuchli dalillar mavjud".[14]

1909 yilda, yangi tug'ilganlarning vakolati sifatida Yosh turk hukumat tarqab ketdi, Abdul Hamid II qisqa vaqt ichida o'zini qo'lga oldi saltanat populist murojaat bilan Islomizm. Keyingi yillarda 30 ming arman halok bo'ldi Adana qirg'ini.[15]

Armaniston milliy harakati

Fedayee ostida kurashayotgan guruh ARF banner. Arman tilidagi matnda "Azadoutioun gam mah" (Ozodlik yoki O'lim) o'qiladi.
Shuningdek qarang: Armaniston milliy harakati

Armaniston milliy harakati, shuningdek, "arman inqilobiy harakati" deb nomlanuvchi, Armanistonning Sharqiy Kichik Osiyodagi tarixiy arman vatanlarida arman davlatini qayta tiklash uchun qilgan sa'y-harakati edi. Zakavkaz (Janubiy Kavkaz). Usmonli imperiyasining tanazzuli qisman natija va qisman sabab bo'ldi millatchilikning ko'tarilishi ko'p millatli va ko'p dinli imperiyani tashkil etgan turli guruhlar orasida. 1877-1878 yillar Rus-turk urushi, bu mustaqillikka olib keldi Ruminiya, Serbiya va Chernogoriya, boshqa intilgan millatchilar va inqilobchilar uchun namuna taqdim etdi. The Xinchak va Toshnak, Armaniston inqilobiy qo'mitalari, 1878 yildan keyin tuzilgan Berlin shartnomasi Rossiyaning to'g'ridan-to'g'ri tahdidi ostida bo'lgan Usmonli imperiyasining sharqiy viloyatlarida.[16] Biroq, bunga Faiz al-Guseyn qarama-qarshi bo'lib, u: "Men uchrashgan ko'plab armanlarni so'radim, ammo u siyosiy mustaqillikni istaydi degan odamni topmadim", dedi.[17]

Istanbuldagi arman yepiskopi Zaven, urush boshlanishidan oldin, arman millatchi-liberallarining organi bo'lgan Msak muxbiriga "allaqachon radikal echim Armancha savol Armaniston taqdiri tarixiy ravishda bog'liq bo'lgan Rossiya suvereniteti ostida butun Armanistonni (shu jumladan, Turkiyaning Sharqiy Anadolisi-M.P.) birlashtirishi mumkin edi. Episkop "ruslar bu erga qancha tez kelishsa, biz uchun shunchalik yaxshi bo'ladi" deb ta'kidladilar.[18]

Armanlar orasida Usmonli imperiyasida yashash sharoitlarini yaxshilash bo'yicha tashviqotlar Birinchi Jahon urushi voqealaridan ancha oldin boshlangan edi. The New York Times 1894 yil 29-iyuldagi:

Kecha Armanistonni Turkiya hukmronligidan ozod qilish uchun tashkil qilingan "Hentchakiste" yoki "Yunoniston vatanparvarlari" uyushmasi a'zolari bo'lgan ikki yuzta vatanparvar armanlar bannerlar va shaffoflar bilan Nyu-York ko'chalarida yurish qildilar. Bannerlar tinch va osoyishta edi va shunchaki paradda Nyu-Yorkdagi arman Hentchakisti bo'lganligini ko'rsatdi, ammo shaffof qog'ozlar: "Turkiya hukumati bilan!" va "Arman inqilobi uchun hurra!" ... Ular vatanparvar yosh armanlardan iborat bo'lib, ular turklarning shafqatsiz amaliyotlari tufayli o'zlarini chet elga olib chiqishlari kerak edi va shu yo'l bilan turk hukmdorlari va'da qilgan yengillikni amalga oshirishga harakat qilmoqdalar. Berlin Kongressi.

1894 yilda, Zeki Posho, To'rtinchi armiya korpusi qo'mondoni, Sassoun qirg'inidagi ishtiroki uchun bezatilgan.[19][20][21] Xabarlarga ko'ra, u "hech qanday isyon topolmay, biz mamlakatni tozaladik, shunda kelajakda hech kim bo'lmasligi kerak".[22]

Arman genotsidi

Asosiy maqola: Arman genotsidi

Arman genotsidi majburiy deportatsiya edi[23] va ko'pchilikni yo'q qilish Usmonli arman aholisi 1915 yildan 1917 yilgacha, qachon 800000 orasida[24] 1 500 000 gacha (Frantsiya hukumati uchun)[25] Armanlar o'ldirildi.[26]

Ga binoan Rafael de Nogales, Usmonli artilleriya qo'mondoni Vanga qarshilik, "armanilarning holati mudofaa edi va Van atrofidagi qishloqlarda sodir etilgan qirg'inlarga javoban".[27] Shuningdek, armanlar majburan ko'chirilayotgan edi Zaytun 1915 yil mart oyida, bundan bir necha oy oldin Tehcir qonuni o'tdi.[28] Keyinchalik qirg'inlar va deportatsiyalar Birinchi Jahon Urushining yakunlanish bosqichida va undan keyingi davrlarda ro'y berdi. Zamonaviy Turkiya hukumati Armanistonning Usmonli davrida yuz bergan qirg'inlari genotsidni tashkil etganligi va Armanistonda va butun dunyoda armanlarning noroziligini qo'zg'atganligini har doim rad etib keladi.[29]So'nggi yillarda Turkiyada, konferentsiyalar va universitetlarda 1915 yildagi arman genotsidi tobora ko'proq muhokama qilinmoqda,[30] chunki qonun mavzu bo'yicha munozaralarga to'sqinlik qilmaydi. Garchi so'z erkinligi va fikr erkinligi Turkiya qonunlari bilan kafolatlangan bo'lsa ham[30][31] tabiati tufayli 301-modda, arman genotsidini da'vo qilayotgan odamlarni millatni "qotillar" deb atashda va shu bilan "turklikni haqorat qilishda" ayblash mumkin.[32] Saksondan ortiq mualliflar "turklikni haqorat qilgani" uchun javobgarlikka tortilgan;[33] Kamol Kerinchsiz, o'ta millatchi advokat, ulardan kamida qirq kishi va uning guruhi uchun javobgardir Büyük Hukukçular Birligi ("Buyuk yuristlar ittifoqi" yoki "turk yuristlar ittifoqi") qolgan qismi uchun.[34][35]Turkiya ta'lim tizimi o'zlarining davlat maktablarida arman genotsidini inkor qilishni o'rgatishni davom ettirmoqdalar[36][37] va uning ko'plari orqali hukumat veb-saytlari.

Birinchi Armaniston Respublikasi

1918 yil Brest-Litovsk shartnomasi da uchta mustaqil davlatni tashkil etdi Kavkaz shu jumladan Birinchi Armaniston Respublikasi. Imzolangan kundan boshlab ikki oy ichida Usmonli imperiyasi yangi paydo bo'lgan Armaniston davlatiga bostirib kirib, shartnomani bekor qildi. Sardorobod jangi. Istilo avjiga chiqdi Batum shartnomasi 1918 yil iyun oyida.

Urushlararo davr va Sovet davri

Shuningdek qarang: Turkiya-Arman urushi va Armaniston SSR

The urushlararo davr bilan belgilangan edi Usmonli imperiyasining bo'linishi; Anadolu bo'ldi Turkiya Respublikasi 1923 yilda. Turk inqilobchilari ishlagan Turkiya mustaqillik urushi Usmonli sodiqlari va qo'shni mamlakatlarga qarshi bo'lib, ular bilan ziddiyatni davom ettirmoqda Armaniston Demokratik Respublikasi.

1920 yil 24 sentyabrda turk qo'shinlari bostirib kirishdi va Sarigamish va Karsga etib borishdi Turkiya-Arman urushi. Mustafo Kamol Otaturk Moskvaga delegatsiyalar yubordi; DRA oxir-oqibat Armaniston SSR Sovet Ittifoqi. The Kars shartnomasi, ilgari tuzilgan rus-turk bilan bir xil Moskva shartnomasi, o'rtasida 1921 yil 23 oktyabrda imzolangan Turkiya Buyuk Milliy Majlisi va vakillari Bolshevistik Rossiya, Sovet Armanistoni, Sovet Ozarbayjon va Sovet Gruziya (bularning barchasi Sovet Ittifoqining tarkibiga kirgan 1922 yil dekabrda Ittifoq shartnomasi ).

Sovet Ittifoqi va Turkiya Kars shartnomasidan keyin rasman betaraf bo'lib qolishdi va Turkiya bilan Armaniston SSR o'rtasida hech qanday dushmanlik bo'lmagan. Kars-Leninakan temir yo'lidan tashqari quruqlik chegarasi yopilgan.

Kapital solig'i va Aşkale

Ikkinchi Jahon urushi davrida Turkiyaning Armaniston, Yunoniston va Yahudiy fuqarolariga o'ta yuqori soliq yuki yuklandi va soliq to'lovchilari bu miqdorni aniqlashda erkin qo'llari bo'lgan, ko'pincha ularni to'lash mumkin bo'lmagan. 1942 yil qishida, to'lashga qodir bo'lmagan yuzlab odamlar, shu jumladan keksa odamlarni shaharga olib kelishdi Aşkale, juda qattiq qish bilan va besh oy davomida doimiy ravishda qor bilan belkurak qilish uchun qilingan. Ba'zilar mahalliy aholiga mehnatni to'lash uchun pul to'lashga qodir edilar, ba'zilari esa sovuqqa va sharoitga berilib, omborlarda, kofexonalarda yoki boshqa boshpana topa oladigan joyda uxladilar.[38] Turk muallifining "Sen mening qalbimni quvontirasan" kitobi Kamol Yalchin muallifning soliq va mehnat lagerlari, sharoitlari va ushbu voqea xavfli bo'lgan davrdagi jabrdiydalar to'g'risida Turkiyadan tanishish uchun Aşkalega 1990-yillarda tashrif buyurishini o'z ichiga oladi.[39]

Istanbul Pogrom

The Istanbul Pogrom qarshi Turkiyada boshlangan etnik ozchiliklar 1955 yil sentyabr oyida Istanbulda istiqomat qilganlar, xususan yunonlar va armanlar.[40]

Harbiylashtirilgan faoliyat

Asosiy maqola: Armanistonni ozod qilish uchun arman maxfiy armiyasi

ASALA, Armanistonni ozod qilish uchun arman maxfiy armiyasi, edi a Marksist-leninchi tashkil etish Livan 1975 yildan 1991 yilgacha ishlagan qazib olish.[41] 1980-yillarda u bir necha mamlakatlardagi turkiyalik diplomatlarga qarshi qator suiqasdlar uyushtirdi va shu bilan Turkiya hukumatini arman genotsidi uchun javobgarligini tan olishga majburlash niyatida edi. kompensatsiyalar va hududni berish.[42] 1920 yilga tegishli hududiy da'vo Sevr shartnomasi va a Vudro Uilson -era rejasi Armaniston vatani.[43]

Guruh butun dunyo bo'ylab hujumlarni rejalashtirgan, ammo undan keyin ichki parchalanish yuz bergan 1983 yil Orli aeroportiga hujum turkiy bo'lmagan talofatlar ko'rdi.[42] Arman cherkovlari rahbarlari va xalqaro hamjamiyat tomonidan muntazam ravishda qoralanib kelinayotgan hujumlarga mashhur Armanistonlik norozilik bildirgan. Artin Penik 1982 yilda kim o'zini yoqib yuborgan yilda Istanbul "s Taksim maydoni ASALA taktikasiga qarshi bo'lgan kuchini namoyish etish. The Armaniston Konstantinopol Patriarxi, o'limidan bir oz oldin kasalxonada qattiq kuygan Penikka tashrif buyurgan, uni "bu shafqatsiz qotilliklar bilan armanlarning noroziligining ramzi" deb ta'riflagan.[44][45]

Shunga o'xshash tashkilot, Arman genotsidiga qarshi adolat komandolari, ba'zan sifatida tanilgan Armaniston inqilobiy armiyasi, kamida oltita qotillik uchun javobgar edi.[iqtibos kerak ] In 1983 yil Lissabondagi Turkiya elchixonasining hujumi, qurolli shaxslar qasddan binoda bomba o'rnatish orqali o'zlarini "qurbon qildilar", shunda ularning hech biri omon qolmadi.[46]

1985 yilda sodir bo'lgan ko'plab hujumlar orasida AQSh Prezidenti Ronald Reygan Kongressdan "tan olingan rezolyutsiyani bekor qilishni so'radi.genotsid qirg'ini "Armanistonliklar, qisman uning terrorizmni bilvosita" mukofotlashi "mumkinligidan qo'rqishgani uchun.[47] Ga ko'ra MIPT veb-saytida ASALA tomonidan 46 kishi halok bo'lgan va 299 kishi jarohat olgan 84 ta voqea sodir bo'lgan.[iqtibos kerak ]

Zamonaviy munosabatlar

Armaniston mustaqilligi 1991 yil

The Xor Virap VII asrga tegishli monastir yopiq Turkiya-Armaniston chegarasida joylashgan.

Turkiya birinchilardan bo'lib tan oldi Armaniston 1991 yilda Sovet Ittifoqi qulaganidan keyin mustaqillik. Anqara, ammo Yerevan bilan diplomatik aloqalar o'rnatishdan bosh tortdi, shuningdek, Alijan - Margaran va Dogukap - Axurik kabi ikki Turkiya-Armaniston chegara eshiklarini ochishdan bosh tortdi. Turkiya ikkita old shartni ilgari surdi: Armaniston Turkmaniston-Armaniston chegarasida tan olinishi kerak Kars shartnomasi 1921 yilda, ya'ni hududiy da'volardan voz kechish, shuningdek xalqaro tan olinish jarayoniga nuqta qo'yish Arman genotsidi.[48]

Diplomatik muzlatish

Tog'li Qorabog 'urushi

Asosiy maqola: Birinchi Tog'li Qorabog 'urushi

Turkiya uning faol a'zosi edi EXHT Minsk guruhi tomonidan 1992 yilda yaratilgan Evropada xavfsizlik va hamkorlik bo'yicha konferentsiya Armaniston va Turkiyaning ittifoqchisi o'rtasidagi ziddiyatni to'xtatish uchun vositachilik qilish Ozarbayjon tortishuv ustidan avtonom viloyat ning Tog'li Qorabog ' 1988 yil 20 fevralda viloyat parlamenti Armaniston bilan birlashishga ovoz berganidan beri avj olgan, ammo bu guruh ozgina yutuqlarga erishdi va keng miqyosli janglar tezda qaytadan boshlandi.

Armaniston-Turkiya munosabatlari asta-sekin yomonlashdi, chunki Armaniston armiyasi Tog'li Qorabog 'mintaqasida yutuqlarni davom ettirmoqda va 1992 yil 9-may Shushani bosib olish armanlar tomonidan olib kelingan Turkiya bosh vaziri Sulaymon Demirel aralashish uchun jamoat tomonidan kuchli bosim ostida qolmoqda. Demirel bunday aralashuvga qarshi bo'lib, Turkiyaning urushga kirishi yanada katta musulmon-nasroniy mojarosini keltirib chiqaradi deb aytdi. Turkiya Ozarbayjonga yordam berish uchun o'z qo'shinlarini yubormadi, balki Ozarbayjonga harbiy yordam va maslahatchilar etkazib berdi.

Tog'li Qorabog'ning barcha ozarbayjon aholisini keyingi etnik tozalash Xo'jayli qirg'ini 1992 yil fevral oyida va Ozarbayjonning boshqa mintaqalarida yashovchi armanlarni etnik tozalashda, xuddi shu davrda bo'lgani kabi Boku Pogromi, hech qachon tiklanmagan aloqalarni yanada og'irlashtirdi.

Birlashgan Millatlar Tashkilotining Xavfsizlik Kengashining 822-sonli qarori

Turkiya homiylik qildi BMT Xavfsizlik Kengashi Qaror 822 Tog'li Qorabog'ni Ozarbayjonning hududiy yaxlitligi deb tasdiqlagan va Arman qo'shinlarining Kelbajardan chiqib ketishini talab qilgan. Keyinchalik 1993 yilda Turkiya Ozarbayjonga qo'shilib Armanistonga iqtisodiy embargo kiritdi va ikki davlat chegarasi yopildi.[49]

1993 yil avgust oyining o'rtalarida armanlar ozarbayjon viloyatlarini egallab olish uchun kuch to'pladilar Fizuli va Jebroil, Tog'li Qorabog 'janubida va Turkiya Bosh vaziri Tansu Çiller bunga javoban minglab turk qo'shinlarini chegaraga jo'natdi va Armanistondan Ozarbayjon hududlaridan chiqarilishini talab qildi.[50] Ammo Armanistondagi Rossiya Federatsiyasi kuchlari ularning harakatlariga qarshi turishdi va shu bilan Turkiyaning mojaroda harbiy rol o'ynashi ehtimolini oldini olishdi.[50]

Xotiralari Arman genotsidi da'volari bilan ziddiyat paytida qayta uyg'ongan etnik tozalash [51] va 1993 yil noyabrda amerikalik tarixchi Bernard Lyuis intervyusida 1915 yilda turklar tomonidan amalga oshirilgan qatliomlarni genotsid deb atash shunchaki "bu tarixning armancha versiyasi" ekanligini aytib, bahsga kirishdi.[52] Keyinchalik u izoh uchun Frantsiya rasmiylari tomonidan sudga tortildi va jarimaga tortildi.[53]

Davom etayotgan bloklash

Turkiya buni tan olmaydi Tog'li Qorabog 'Respublikasi (Artsax Respublikasi) 1994 yil 16 mayda paydo bo'lgan Rossiya vositachiligida sulh to'xtatildi Birinchi Tog'li Qorabog 'urushi va Armanistonning bahsli viloyat va uning atrofidagi ettita tumandan chiqib ketishini diplomatik aloqalar o'rnatish va ularning qo'shma chegaralarini ochish uchun dastlabki shart sifatida belgilab qo'ydi.[54][55]

Armanistonning ta'kidlashicha, Turkiya Tog'li Qorabog 'mojarosi hal qilinmaganligi sababli davom etayotgan qamalni mamlakatni bu kabi loyihalar bilan izolyatsiya qilish uchun ishlatgan. Boku-Tbilisi-Jayhon neft quvuri, Boku-Tbilisi-Erzurum tabiiy gaz quvuri va Kars-Tbilisi-Boku temir yo'li, ularning barchasi to'g'ridan-to'g'ri Armanistonni birlashtirishning iqtisodiy mantig'iga qaramay Armanistonni chetlab o'tishadi. Karsdan Bokuga temir yo'l liniyasi aslida allaqachon mavjud edi, lekin u Turkiya-Armanistonning yopiq chegarasidan o'tib, Turkiya tomonidan yopilgan edi.[56]

O'zining va kam miqdordagi shamol va suv manbalarining ko'mir, tabiiy gaz yoki neftga ega bo'lmagan Armaniston azaldan jiddiy energiya tanqisligidan aziyat chekib kelgan va endi qo'shni Turkiya va Ozarbayjon tomonidan qamal qilingan, bundan oldin deyarli barcha yoqilg'isini olib kelgan. ikkinchisini qayta boshlashini e'lon qilishga majbur qildi VVER reaktorlari Metsamor atom elektr stansiyasi. Armaniston atrof-muhit qo'mitasi raisi Samyuel Shahinian qarorni tushuntirdi; "Bizning odamlarimiz shu qadar sovuqki, biz ularga hech narsani tushuntirib berolmaymiz, ular shunchaki iliq bo'lishni xohlashadi."[57] Sovet hukumati tomonidan 1979 yilda foydalanishga topshirilgan va uzoq vaqtdan beri xavfli deb hisoblangan reaktorlar 1988 yilda xavfsizlik nuqtai nazaridan yopilgan. Spitak zilzilasi. Ushbu e'lon Turkiyaning Metsamordan atigi 17 km uzoqlikdagi shov-shuviga sabab bo'ldi. "Muayyan xatarlar bor", deb tasdiqladi Armaniston spikeri o'rinbosari Ara Sahakyan, "ammo biz buni anglashimiz kerak va hamma bizning boshqa ilojimiz yo'qligini tushunishi kerak".[57]

Metsamor atom elektr stansiyasi

Metsamor qayta ishga tushirildi

Asosiy maqola: Metsamor atom elektr stansiyasi

Metsamor agregati-2 1995 yilda xavfsizlikni yaxshilashga taxminan 50 million dollar sarflanganidan keyin ishlab chiqarishga tavsiya etilgan, ammo bu Turkiyadagi xavfsizlik muammolarini engillashtirmagan. Turkiya Atom Energiyasi Agentligi (TAEK) bilan birga Turkiya Atrof-muhit va o'rmon xo'jaligi vazirligi, Kafkas universiteti va turli institutlar va fondlar mintaqada reaktorning chegarasi bo'ylab qattiq nazorat infratuzilmasini shakllantirdilar va havodan doimiy ravishda o'lchov olib borish uchun RESAI erta ogohlantirish tizimini o'rnatdilar. gamma nurlanishi darajalar va mahalliy tuproq, o'simlik va oziq-ovqat mahsulotlarining namunaviy tahlillari darajalar chegaradan oshib ketganda oldindan ogohlantirish uchun. TAEK raisining o'rinbosari doktor Erdener Birol tasdiqlaydi: "Radiatsiya darajasi oshgani sayin, bu haqda darhol Anqaraga xabar beriladi".[58][59]

Mamlakatni qo'shnilari Turkiya va Ozarbayjon tomonidan davom etayotgan blokadasi zavod uchun yadroviy yoqilg'ining bortga uchib ketishini anglatishi aniqlanganda, qo'shimcha xavfsizlik muammolari paydo bo'ldi. Antonov va Tupolev Rossiyadan samolyotlar Yerevan aeroporti Evropa Ittifoqining Yerevandagi delegatsiyasi rahbari Aleksis Luber "potentsial yadroviy bomba atrofida uchish" bilan taqqoslagan maxfiy yuklarda.[60]

Eli Vizelning arman genotsidini tasdiqlashi

2000 yil 9-iyun kuni to'liq sahifadagi bayonotda The New York Times, 126 nafar olimlar, shu jumladan Nobel mukofoti - g'olib Elie Vizel, tarixchi Yuda Bauer va sotsiolog Irving Horowitz, Birinchi Jahon urushi ekanligini tasdiqlovchi hujjatni imzoladi Arman genotsidi tarixiy haqiqatdir va shunga muvofiq ravishda G'arb demokratiyalari hukumatlarini ham uni shunday deb tan olishga undaydi. "[61] Ga binoan Stiven Kinzer yangi asrning birinchi yillarida milliy ongni qayta shakllantirish "[turklarga] 1915 yilgi fojianing muqobil qarashlariga onglarini ochishlariga imkon berdi" va, "bu mavzuga bag'ishlangan o'ndan ortiq kitoblar Turkiyada nashr etildi, kabi unvonlarga ega Bizning mahallamizdagi armanlar va Armaniston tabusi."[62]

ALTAY ishi

Nordic Monitor yangiliklar veb-saytiga ko'ra, Turkiya Armanistonga ALTAY kodli harbiy hujumni rejalashtirgan. Operatsiya rejasi 2001 yilda yakunlangan. Tafsilotlar 2019 yilda oshkor bo'lgan, o'shanda reja hanuzgacha amal qilishi aytilgan.[63]

Metsamorning oxirgi muddati

Armaniston a'zosi bo'lganidan ko'p o'tmay Evropa Kengashi 2001 yilda Yerevan hokimiyati Armanistonni qo'shni bilan bog'laydigan gaz quvuri qurilishida Evropa Ittifoqining yordamini kutishlarini aytdi Eron Turkiya va Ozarbayjon blokadasini olib tashlashda. Armaniston energetika vazirining o'rinbosari Areg Galstyan Armanistonning 40 foiz energiyasini ta'minlaydigan va ortiqcha quvvatni qo'shni Gruziyaga sotadigan ushbu zavod 2016 yilgacha va ehtimol 2031 yilgacha ishlashini davom ettirish kerakligini ko'rsatib, "1988 yilda zavodni yopish juda katta xato edi; Bu energiya inqirozini keltirib chiqardi va xalq va iqtisodiyot zarar ko'rdi. Hukumat zavodni yopish orqali yana shu muammoga duch kelishi mumkin emas. "[60]

Professor Hayrettin Qilich Ferrara universiteti tomonidan birgalikda tashkil etilgan anjumanda so'zga chiqish Kars Shahar Kengashi va Kafkas universiteti bunga javoban "Xavf juda katta. Metsamor atom elektr stantsiyasi Kars uchun muammo emas, Ağrı, Igdir, Yerevan va Naxichevan ammo Turkiya, Gruziya va butun Armaniston muammosi. Bu mintaqaviy muammo. "[58] Igdir shahar hokimi Nurettin Aras, "Biz falokat xavfi bor. Biz atom stansiyasini yopish uchun murojaat qilamiz" dedi.[64] va Kars shahar hokimi Naif Alibeyog'lu "Biz ushbu zavodni yopish uchun hamma narsani qilayapmiz, ammo hamma narsa bizning qo'limizda emas. Bu masalada davlat hokimiyati idoralari yaqindan ishtirok etishi shart" dedi.[58] va "Turkiya hukumati zavodni yopish to'g'risida tashabbus ko'rsatishi kerak. Turkiya ham, Armaniston xalqi ham bundan xabardor bo'lishi kerak [sic ] Xavfli."[65][66]

Galstyan armanlar uchun "elektrni ushlab turish" muhimroq ekanligini ta'kidlab, xavfsizlik masalalarini rad etdi.[60] Jeremy Peyj yozayotganda The Times "aksariyat nasroniy xalqlari islomiy qo'shnilari bilan dushmanlik tarixi tufayli import qilinadigan energiyaga ishonishni istamaydilar" deb ta'kidladi.[67]

Evropa Ittifoqi va boshqa xalqaro tashkilotlar bilan zavodni ekspluatatsiya qilishni kamida 2016 yilgacha uzaytirish to'g'risida yakuniy kelishuvga erishildi.

Turkiya-Armaniston yarashtirish komissiyasi

Turkiya-Armaniston yarashtirish komissiyasi 2001 yil 9 iyulda Shveytsariyaning Jeneva shahrida Armaniston, Turkiya, Rossiya va Qo'shma Shtatlarning o'n kishidan iborat bo'lib, asosan o'zlarining sobiq yutuqlari bilan tanilgan sobiq yuqori martabali siyosatchilardan iborat bo'lib, o'zaro tushunishni rivojlantirishga qaratilgan. va turklar va armanlar o'rtasidagi xayrixohlik va aloqalarni yaxshilashni rag'batlantirish. " Amerikaning Armaniston assambleyasi (AAA) raisi Xarair Xovnanian "Bu ikki qo'shni o'rtasidagi achchiqlik va ishonchsizlik bilan ajralib turadigan farqlarni yarashtirishga qaratilgan birinchi ko'p intizomli, har tomonlama urinish va bu katta yutuqdir" dedi va AAA Prezidenti Kerolin Mugar "Biz Turkiya-Armaniston yarashtirish komissiyasi boshqa shunga o'xshash xalqaro sa'y-harakatlar tajribasidan foydalanadi va foydalanadi deb ishonamiz."[68]

Turkiyada hokimiyat tepasiga AK Partiya keladi

The Adolat va taraqqiyot partiyasi (AKP) quyidagilarni kuzatib, Turkiyada hokimiyatga keldi 2002 yil Turkiya umumiy saylovi, ostida Rajab Toyyib Erdo'g'an va Abdulloh Gul tomonidan tuzilgan tashqi siyosat bilan Ahmet Dovuto'g'li Armaniston-Turkiya munosabatlarida yangi umid paydo bo'lishiga olib keladigan "qo'shnilar bilan nol muammolarni" ilgari surgan.

Armanilarning Turkiyaga kirishiga qo'yilgan cheklovlar 2002 yil yanvar oyida bekor qilingan va ikki davlat o'rtasidagi chegara yopiq qolgan bo'lsa-da, armanistonlik ishchilar Gruziya orqali mamlakatga kirib kelayotgani va 30 kunlik norezidentlik vizasi tugaganidan keyin noqonuniy ravishda qolganligi xabar qilingan. Noqonuniy muhojirlarni Turkiya Bosh vaziri Erdo'g'an bilan nisbatan qulayroq saqlash uchun ishlab chiqarilgan Turkiyaning e'lon qilinmagan rasmiy siyosati keyinchalik "ular o'z vatanida o'zlarini ushlab tura olmadilar va biz eshiklarimizni ochdik. Biz ularni deportatsiya qilishimiz mumkin edi, lekin biz buni qilmayapmiz" deb e'lon qildi. Gazi universiteti professor Mehmet Seyfettin Erol, "Bu Turkiya uchun yumshoq kuch", deya o'zaro munosabatlarni yaxshilashga asoslangan siyosatning "ularga" boshqalar "sifatida munosabatda bo'lish hech qanday maqsadga xizmat qilmaydi va bu, ehtimol, armanlarni Turkiyadan uzoqlashtiradi", deb tasdiqladi.[69][70]

The Xalqaro o'tish davri adolat markazi Turkiya-Armaniston yarashtirish komissiyasi tomonidan Genotsid konvensiyasining tortishuvlarga tatbiq etilishi to'g'risida hisobot berishni so'ragan. Ushbu hisobotda "genotsid" atamasi "1915-1918 yillarda Usmoniylarning armanlarni qirg'in qilishlari" ni to'g'ri deb ta'riflagan degan qarorga keltirilgan, ammo Turkiyaning salbiy reaktsiyasini yumshatish maqsadida qo'shilgan.[iqtibos kerak ], zamonaviy Turkiya Respublikasi ushbu tadbir uchun qonuniy javobgar emasligini.[71][72]

Turkiyaning Evropa Ittifoqiga qo'shilishi masalasi

Ba'zi Evropa Ittifoqi siyosatchilari Turkiyaga arman genotsidini rasmiy ravishda tan olishlariga bosim o'tkazdilar EI.[73][74] Turkiyaning Evropa Ittifoqiga kirishga urinishdagi zaifligidan foydalanish bo'yicha ushbu harakatlar Turkiya ichida tanqidga uchradi.[75][76]

Ushbu bosim usulini qattiq tanqid qilganlar orasida Turkiyaga bosim o'tkazish kech edi Xrant Dink, kim aybladi Angela Merkel buni tan olgan homiylik qonunchiligi Arman genotsidi Turkiyaning Evropa Ittifoqi ambitsiyalariga putur etkazish.[77] Dink, arman va turk xalqlarining farovonligi uchun chin dildan manfaatdor bo'lgan har kim tezroq Metsamor reaktorini almashtirish uchun Yerevanga bosim o'tkazishini yoki Turkmaniston nihoyat Armaniston-Turkiya chegarasini ochishi uchun bosim o'tkazishini yoki hattoki umuman "iqtisodiy va diplomatik jihatdan yordam berib, ikkala tomonda ham mavjud bo'lgan mo''tadil odamlar. "[77]

Armanistonning sobiq prezidentiga ko'ra Robert Kocharyan, "Armaniston hech qachon Turkiyaning Evropa Ittifoqiga qo'shilishiga qarshi bo'lmagan."[78][79] Armanistonning o'zi Evropa Ittifoqining "Yangi mahalla" guruhining a'zosi bo'lib, u bir kun kelib Evropa Ittifoqiga a'zo bo'lishiga olib kelishi mumkin.[80]

Armanistonning sobiq tashqi ishlar vaziri Vardan Oskanyan "genotsidni inkor qilish zarar keltiradi" degan fikrni qabul qilar ekan, Turkiya nuqtai nazari "munosabatlarimiz normallashishiga to'sqinlik qilmasligi" ni ta'kidlamoqda.[81]

Biz uchun sud ishi yo'q, biz bu haqda hech qachon gaplashmaymiz, chunki biz haqiqiy dalillar, ota-onalarimiz va buvalarimiz bilan katta bo'ldik. Ushbu fojianing tirik dalili, genotsiddan omon qolish, men ulardan birining o'g'liman. Shunday qilib, armanlar uchun biz hech qachon sudga murojaat qilib, bu genotsid sodir bo'lganligini isbotlashimiz kerak bo'lgan muammo bo'lmagan. Biz uchun savol siyosiy echim topishdir. Chunki bu masala na tarixiy, na qonuniy, siyosiy ... Turkiya va Armaniston hukumatlari o'rtasida.[81]

2005 yildan boshlab Turkiya Armanistonga o'z havo hududini qayta tiklash bilan cheklangan hajmda ochdi Armaviya o'rtasida parvozlar Yerevan va Istanbul; ammo er savdosi boshqa yo'nalishda davom etdi Gruziya.

1915 yil voqealari bo'yicha qo'shma tarixiy komissiya taklif qilingan

2005 yilda bir guruh turkiyalik olimlar va fikr yurituvchilar akademik konferentsiya o'tkazdilar, unda arman qatliomi haqidagi barcha qarashlar hurmat bilan tinglanishiga va'da berildi. Stiven Kinzerning so'zlariga ko'ra, "ba'zi sharhlovchilar konferentsiyada aytilgan qismlarga qarshi chiqishdi, ammo deyarli barchasi ushbu og'riqli mavzu bo'yicha ochiq munozaralar uchun erishilgan yutuqni olqishladilar".[62] The Genotsid olimlarining xalqaro assotsiatsiyasi tasdiqladi[82] bu ilmiy dalillar "Usmonli imperiyasining yosh turk hukumati o'zlarining armanistonlik fuqarolarini - qurolsiz nasroniy ozchilik aholisini muntazam ravishda qirg'in qilishni boshladi. Bir milliondan ortiq armanlar to'g'ridan-to'g'ri o'ldirish, ochlik, qiynoqlar va majburiy o'lim yurishlari orqali yo'q qilindi" va qoraladi. Turkiya uning haqiqiy va axloqiy haqiqatini inkor etishga urinmoqda.

Ikki mamlakat milliy arxivlarini tekshiradigan va ularning tadqiqotlari natijalarini xalqaro jamoatchilikka etkazadigan Turkiya va Armaniston tarixchilaridan iborat qo'shma komissiya tuzish g'oyasi Turkiya Buyuk Millat Majlisi tomonidan ma'qullandi.[83]

Biroq, Armaniston prezidentining 2005 yil aprel oyidagi bosh vazirga maktubi Rajab Toyyib Erdo'g'an dedi,

Ikki tomonlama munosabatlarni rivojlantirish hukumatlarning vazifasidir va biz bu mas'uliyatni tarixchilarga topshirishga haqqimiz yo'q. Shuning uchun biz old shartlarsiz mamlakatlarimiz o'rtasida normal munosabatlarni o'rnatishni yana bir bor taklif qildik va taklif qildik.[84]

2006 yilda, arman millatiga mansub frantsuz fuqarolari tomonidan olib borilgan ko'p yillik tashviqotlardan so'ng, Frantsiya Milliy Assambleyasi, Stiven Kinzer "hayratlanarli g'alaba" deb ataydi[62] 1915 yilda Usmonli turklari genotsidni amalga oshirganligini rasman e'lon qildi va boshqalarning aksini ta'kidlashi uchun jinoyat deb tan oldi.

2007 yil fevral oyida Armaniston prezidenti Robert Kocharian Frantsiyaga tashrifi chog'ida "ikki tomonlama munosabatlarni normallashtirish tarixchilar emas, hukumatlarning vazifasidir" dedi.[85]

2015 yil aprel oyida Armaniston prezidenti Serj Sarkisyan "Tarixchilar komissiyasini tashkil etish to'g'risidagi Turkiyaning taklifi faqat bitta maqsadga ega, bu jarayonni kechiktirishdir. Arman genotsidini tan olish va xalqaro hamjamiyat e'tiborini ushbu jinoyatdan chalg'itishi kerak. Bu nafaqat bizning, balki xalqaro hamjamiyatning ham fikri Arman genotsidini tan olish va qoralashda davom etmoqda. "[86]

2007 yildan keyingi diplomatik eritish

Xrant Dinkin o'ldirilishi

2007 yil yanvar oyida sodir etilgan suiqasd Xrant Dink Arman millatiga ega bo'lgan Turkiya fuqarosi, Armaniston-Turkiya munosabatlari masalasini zamonaviy turk fuqarolarining milliy ongiga olib keldi. Dink turklarni arman genotsidini muhokama qilishda muhim rol o'ynadi, bu bilan u uchta alohida holatda o'zini jinoiy ta'qib qilish maqsadiga aylandi. Shunga qaramay, Dink ham ba'zi tanqidlarni saqlab qoldi Arman diasporasi, zamonaviy turk xalqini jalb qilmasdan genotsid da'vosini bajarishni talab qilganligi uchun.

Qotillikda gumon qilingan 17 yoshli millatchi Ogun Samast hibsga olinganidan ko'p o'tmay, jilmayib turgan turk politsiyasi va uning yonida qotilning suratlari paydo bo'ldi. jandarma, politsiya hibsxonasida bo'lganida qotil bilan Turkiya bayrog'i oldida suratga tushgan.[87] Rasmlar surishtiruvlar boshlanishiga va ishda ishtirok etganlarni lavozimidan chetlashtirishga turtki berdi.[87]

Turkiyada yuz ming motam qatnashchilari 2007 yil yanvarida millatchi radikal tomonidan armanistonlik ziyolilar Xrant Dinkin o'ldirilishiga qarshi norozilik namoyishiga chiqishdi. Ofisi Agos Dink o'qqa tutilgan gazeta, tasvirning o'ng chetiga yaqin joylashgan; bu katta qora bayroq tushirilgan uyning o'ng tomonidagi birinchi uy.

Xrant Dinkning dafn marosimida o'n minglab Turkiya fuqarolari Dink bilan birdamlik uchun yurish qildilar, ularning ko'pchiligida "Biz hammamiz Xrant Dink, biz hammamiz armanmiz" deb yozilgan plakatlar Armaniston-Turkiya munosabatlarining rivojlanishida umidvor yozuv bo'lib yangradi.[88]

Nobel mukofoti sovrindori genotsidini qayta tasdiqlash

2007 yilda Elie Vizel Insoniyat uchun asos yaratildi xat 53 tomonidan imzolangan Nobel mukofotlari Genotsid olimlarining 1915 yildagi armanlarni o'ldirish genotsidni tashkil etganligi haqidagi xulosasini yana bir bor tasdiqladi.[89][90] Keyin Turkiya tashqi ishlar vaziri, Abdulloh Gul, Turkiya va Armaniston tarixchilari qo'mitasini 2005 yilda birinchi marta aytilganidek, 1915 yil voqealarini qayta ko'rib chiqishga chaqirganligini yana bir bor tasdiqladi.[85] ammo armanlar bu taklifga qiziqish bildirmadilar, 2007 yilda Stiven Kinzer tomonidan o'tkazilgan "Armanilarning atigi 3 foizi Turkiyani genotsidni tan olishga majbur qilish ularning hukumatining ustuvor vazifasi bo'lishi kerak deb hisoblaydi" degan jamoat fikri bo'yicha so'rov o'tkazdi. bu ularning ustuvor yo'nalishlari ro'yxatida. "[62]

Arman millatiga mansub amerikaliklarning sa'y-harakatlari AQSh Kongressi arman genotsidini tan olgan qarorni qabul qilish, shu bilan birga Stiven Kinzer "ularning Vashingtondagi ajoyib lobbisi" deb atagan va "deyarli o'tgan Vakillar palatasi ta'siri tufayli 2007 yilda Palata spikeri Nensi Pelosi Kaliforniya shtatida ko'plab farovon arman-amerikaliklar yashaydi "[62] qadar Kondoliza Rays va Robert M. Geyts ga ochiq xatga imzo chekdi Kongress, Arman genotsidini rasman tan olish, Turkiyani "antagonizatsiya qilish" orqali "daladagi Amerika qo'shinlariga zarar etkazishi mumkin" degan ogohlantirish.[91][92]

Metsamorni almashtirish

2007 yil 7 sentyabrda Armaniston energetika vaziri Armen Movsisyan Metsamor agregati-2 o'rniga o'sha joyda 2 milliard dollar sarf qilingan yangi AES qurilishi kerakligini e'lon qildi. "Loyihaning texnik-iqtisodiy asoslanishi Armaniston, Rossiya, AQSh va Xalqaro Atom Energiyasi Agentligi tomonidan amalga oshirilmoqda. Eski atom elektr stantsiyasi to'rt yarim yil ichida qayta qurilishi kerak", deya ta'kidladi u "ko'pchilik" xorijiy davlatlar endi Armaniston atom elektr stantsiyasiga ega bo'lishi kerakligini tushunmoqda. " [93] Yaqinda da'volarni rad etgan TAEK Bugungi zamon that its latest protest to the IAEA was made in response to the RESAI early warning system indicating "an increase in radioactive leakage in the region,"[94] stating, "None of the radioactivity analyses or RESAI station measurements done up until now have uncovered radioactivity or radiation levels above normal,"[93] confirmed that it would be involved in following related developments and taking the necessary precautions from the Turkish side.

2008 Armenian Genocide Remembrance Day

On April 24, 2008, during Armenia's annual Genotsidni xotirlash kuni, a Turkiya bayrog'i was stomped on during an official demonstration in Yerevan. The Turkiya tashqi ishlar vazirligi reacted by issuing the statement: "With the meaning that it carries, the Turkish flag symbolizes freedom and all the fundamental values and beliefs of the Turkish nation. The flag is accepted as synonymous with our nation's existence. The importance attributed by the Turkish nation to these values and its flag is widely known. In this regard, the related news reports led to great sadness, upset and indignation in our society."[95]

2008–2009 Georgia–Russia crisis

Keyingi 2008 yil Janubiy Osetiya urushi, which prompted concerns over stability of energy routes in the Caucasus, normalisation of ties with Armenia became a priority for the Turkish government.[96][97]

Attempted rapprochement

Asosiy maqola: Tsyurix protokollari

Turkish Presidential visit to Armenia and subsequent negotiations

In September 2008, Turkish President Abdulloh Gul became the first Turkish head of state to visit Armenia after he accepted the invitation of Armaniston prezidenti Serj Sarkisyan qatnashmoq FIFA Jahon chempionati qualifier football match between the Turkcha va Armenian national football teams.[98] Talks during the game focused on bilateral relations and Karabakh, and did not touch upon the Armenian Genocide,[99] though Foreign Minister Ali Babacan raised the issue soon afterward.[100] Both of the presidents and their countries’ respective press reflected positively on the visit setting the ground for a thaw in diplomatic relations that was expected to have made great progress in time for Sargsyan's reciprocal visit to Turkey in October to watch the return match.[101]

Arafasida 2009 US presidential visit to Turkey tomonidan Barak Obama sources in Ankara and Yerevan announced that a deal might soon be struck to reopen the border between the two states and exchange diplomatic personnel.[3] A tadqiqot conducted on the Armenia-Turkey border reopening has shown that closed borders between Armenia and its neighboring countries have a negative impact on the Armenian economy. It is not argued that a re-opening of the borders (especially with Turkey) will bring many benefits to the Armenian economy.

Armenian Foreign Minister Eduard Nalbandyan confirmed, "Turkey and Armenia have gone a long way toward opening the Turkey-Armenia border, and they will come closer to opening it soon,"[102] but dismissed any connection to the Nagorno-Karabakh dispute.The Xalqaro inqiroz guruhi (ICG) issued a report on the normalisation stating, "The politicized debate whether to recognize as genocide the destruction of much of the Ottoman Armenian population and the stalemated Armenia-Azerbaijan conflict over Nagorno-Karabakh should not halt momentum." Stating that whilst, "The unresolved Armenia-Azerbaijan conflict over Nagorno-Karabakh still risks undermining full adoption and implementation of the potential package deal between Turkey and Armenia", the, "Bilateral détente with Armenia ultimately could help Baku recover territory better than the current stalemate."[103]

Announcement of provisional roadmap and reactions

On 22 April 2009, it was announced that high-level diplomatic talks underway in Switzerland since 2007 "had achieved tangible progress and mutual understanding," and that "a road map has been identified,"[104] for normalizing diplomatic relations between the two countries, although no formal text had yet been signed. Bugungi zamon concluded that the cautious approach by Turkish authorities was intended to minimise criticism from Azerbaijan and nationalist Turks who would complain of "submission to Western pressure" but went on to quote an unnamed Western diplomat who speaking to Reuters confirmed that, "All the documents have been agreed in principle," and that, "We are talking about weeks or months."[105]

Arman Dashnak partiyasi responded to the announcement in an April 26 closed-door meeting with a decision to withdraw its 16 deputies, who held three ministries in the Armenian Cabinet, from the coalition government.Reaction to the announcement within Turkey was more muted with opposition MHP leader Bahçeli complaining that, "Armenia knows what is going on; Switzerland knows what is going on; Turkish officials involved in the process know. That means the Turkish nation and Parliament are the only ones who have no information about the process," before going on to conclude that, "It would be beneficial if the prime minister or the minister for foreign affairs would inform Parliament. We will follow developments, but for the moment we don’t know the depth of the agreement. Taking the explanations made so far into account, we are monitoring whether any further steps are being taken in the issue of opening the border."[106]

International reaction to the announcement was positive, despite concerns that adverse reaction from Azerbaijan could affect European energy security.

United States statements on Armenian Remembrance Day

2009 yil statement by U.S. President Barack Obama on Armenian Remembrance Day[107] claimed that, "reckoning with the past holds out a powerful promise of reconciliation," before going on to state that, "the best way to advance that goal right now is for the Armenian and Turkish people to address the facts of the past as part of their effort to move forward," and reaffirming his strong support for "efforts by the Turkish and Armenian people to work through this painful history in a way that is honest open and constructive," but although, as previously indicated, US President Obama did not use the word ‘genocide’ his use of the Armenian term Meds Yeghern, translated as "Great Crime" or "Calamity", managed to offend both sides of the dispute.[108] Armenian groups felt betrayed at the reversal of promises of recognition made during the 2008 yil AQSh Prezidenti saylovi whist Turkish authorities felt that Obama had gone back on promises made during the recent 2009 US presidential visit to Turkey. Despite not saying the word genocide, Obama made it clear that he had not changed his views about the Armenian Genocide in the statement, saying "I have consistently stated my own view of what occurred in 1915, and my view of that history has not changed."

Turkish prime minister Rajab Toyyib Erdo'g'an said, "Turkey is not a country that can be flattered and then fooled," before going on to conclude that, "Turkish-Armenian relations will be normalised, historical matters will be enlightened and the road will be paved for peace if countries that have nothing to do with the issue stop getting involved." Turkish opposition leaders were equally critical with MHP leader Bahçeli stating, "Looking at the entire statement, one will see that it is unacceptable," and, "If the U.S. sacrifices Turkey for the sake of Armenian votes, everyone, including most notably Armenia, will have to suffer the consequences," and CHP leader Baykal clarifying that, "Obama's statement shows that efforts to please outsiders by giving concessions are not yielding any result, and we have managed to alienate Azerbaijan, too." [109]

2009 Turkish Presidential visit to Azerbaijan and Russia

Armenian authorities responded to comments made by Turkish Prime Minister Erdoğan during his official visit to Boku that, "There is a relation of cause and effect here. The occupation of Nagorno-Karabakh is the cause, and the closure of the border is the effect. Without the occupation ending, the gates will not be opened,"[110] with a statement from the office of Armenian President Sarksyan that read, "The president said that, as he repeatedly pointed out during Armenian-Turkish contacts, any Turkish attempt to interfere in the settlement of the Nagorno-Karabakh problem can only harm that process."[111] Armenian Foreign Minister Nalbandian reiterated that, "Concerning the Armenian-Turkish normalisation process, over the past year, following the initiative of the Armenian President together with our Turkish neighbours and with the help of our Swiss partners, we have advanced toward opening one of the last closed borders in Europe and the normalisation of our relations without preconditions. The ball is on the Turkish side now. And we hope that they will find the wisdom and the courage to make the last decisive step. We wish to be confident that the necessary political will can eventually leave behind the mentality of the past."[112]

Erdoğan flew on from Baku to Sochi, Russia, for a 16 May "working visit" with Rossiya Bosh vaziri Vladimir Putin at which he stated, "Turkey and Russia have responsibilities in the region. We have to take steps for the peace and well being of the region. This includes the Nagorno-Karabakh problem, the Middle East dispute, the Kipr muammosi." Putin responded that, "Russia and Turkey seek for such problems to be resolved and will facilitate this in every way," but, "As for difficult problems from the past–and the Karabakh problem is among such issues-a compromise should be found by the participants in the conflict. Other states which help reach a compromise in this aspect can play a role of mediators and guarantors to implement the signed agreements."[113][114]

2009 signing of accord

Asosiy maqola: Tsyurix protokollari
Nalbandyan and Davutoglu signing the accord

An accord between Armenia and Turkey was signed by the foreign ministers of the two countries, Ahmet Dovuto'g'li va Eduard Nalbandyan, on 10 October 2009.[115][116] The signing took place in Tsyurix, Shveytsariya.[116][117] Armenians worldwide had protested against the deal because of the controversial concessions that the Armenian leadership was preparing to make, most notably in regards to the Armenian genocide and the Turkish-Armenian border. The deal followed more than one year of talks.[115] It was designed to allow the opening of borders and to set up a formal diplomatic relationship.[117] The signing was attended by Bernard Kushner, Sergey Lavrov va Hillari Klinton, the foreign ministers of France, Russia and the United States, respectively.[115]

Suspension of the ratification process

Those diplomatic efforts to normalise the relations initiated by Armenia eventually faltered.

In Armenia, before sending the protocols to the parliament, it was send to the Constitutional Court to have their konstitutsionlik tasdiqlanishi kerak. The Constitutional Court made references to the preamble of the protocols underlying three main issues.[118] One of them stated that the implementation of the protocols did not imply Armenia's official recognition of the existing Turkish-Armenian border established by the Kars shartnomasi. By doing so, the Constitutional Court rejected one of the main premises of the protocols, i.e. “the mutual recognition of the existing border between the two countries as defined by relevant treaties of international law".[118][119] This was regarded by the Turkish Government as effectively revising the protocols and thus the reason to back down from the process.[120]

The ruling Armenian coalition decided to propose a suspension of the ratification process to the president after the Turkish Prime Minister Erdogan announced multiple times that the Turkish ratification depended on a peace deal in Nagorno-Karabakh conflict. On the same day President Sargsyan suspended the ratification process although announcing, that Armenia does not suspend the process of normalisation of relationships with Turkey as a whole.[5]

Events after the failed thaw

Possible territorial claims by Armenia

On July 5, 2013,[121] during a forum of Armenian lawyers in Yerevan on the 100th Anniversary of the Armenian Genocide organized by the Ministry of Diaspora, Armenia's Prosecutor General Agvan Hovsepyan made a "sensational statement".[122][123] Hovsepyan stated:

Indeed, the Republic of Armenia should have its lost territories returned and the victims of the Arman genotsidi should receive material compensation. But all these claims must have perfect legal grounds. I strongly believe that the descendants of the genocide must receive material compensation, churches miraculously preserved in Turkey’s territory and church lands must be returned to the Armenian Church, and the Republic of Armenia must get back its lost lands.

Ga binoan Endi Armaniston news agency "this was seen as the first territorial claim of Armenia to Turkey made on an official level. The prosecutor general is the carrier of the highest legal authority in the country, and his statement is equivalent to an official statement."[122]

In response, the Turkish Ministry of Foreign Affairs released a statement on July 12, 2013:

Such a declaration made by an official occupying a position as important as that of Prosecutor General reflects the prevailing problematic mentality in Armenia as to the territorial integrity of its neighbor Turkey and to Turkish-Armenian relations and also contradicts the obligations it has undertaken towards the international organizations of which it is a member, particularly the UN and the OSCE. One should be well aware that no one can presume to claim land from Turkey.[124]

During his visit to Baku on July 17, 2013, Turkish Foreign Affairs Minister Ahmed Davutoglu described Armenian land claims as "product of delirium."[125]

2015 yildan beri

Shuningdek qarang: Armenia–Russia relations § Military union

The signing, on 23 December 2015, by Russian defence minister Sergey Shoygu and his Armenian counterpart Seyran Ohanyan of an agreement to form a Joint Air Defense System in the Caucasus[126][127] that followed the Armenian minister's statement that the sulh bilan Ozarbayjon ustidan ajratilgan mintaqa ning Tog'li Qorabog ' virtually no longer existed, provoked concern on the part of Turkey's government.[128]

Arman Tashqi Ishlar Vazirligi published a statement which condemned the 2019 yil Turkiyaning Suriyaning shimoli-sharqiga hujumi, "which would lead to deterioration of regional security, losses among civilians, mass displacement and eventually to a new humanitarian crisis."[129]

Outstanding issues

Arman genotsidini rad etish

Asosiy maqola: Arman genotsidini rad etish

Tensions stemming from the Armenian Genocide, the systematic murder of an estimated 1,500,000 Armanlar by the authorities of the Usmonli imperiyasi during the First World War, are a bitter point of contention, with most historians defining the killings as a genotsid,[130][131] a term whose applicability the Turkish state rejects.[132]

Most historians maintain that it was a deliberate and intentional attempt to exterminate the Armenian population of the Ottoman Empire. This view is also the position of the Republic of Armenia.[133][134][135][136]

The Republic of Turkey rejects the 1.5 million figure for the final death toll, insisting that the deaths were closer to the range of 200,000–300,000,[137] and insists that they were the result of disease, famine and inter-ethnic strife during the turmoil of World War I, saying that the Armenian Toshnak va Xenchak rebels had sided with the Rossiya armiyasi which invaded eastern Anatolia during the war and committed massacres against the local Muslim population (Turklar va Kurdlar ) in that area.[138]

Merely to speak of the Arman genotsidi in Turkey is to risk "insulting Turkishness", a criminal offense for which various Turkish intelligentsia have been brought to trial, as mentioning the word genocide itself infers its occurrence.[139]

In response to Turkey's calls for a further impartial study, Isroil Charni va Genotsid olimlarining xalqaro assotsiatsiyasi responded in an open letter to the Turkish prime minister,

We represent the major body of scholars who study genocide in North America and Europe. We are concerned that in calling for an impartial study of the Armenian Genocide you may not be fully aware of the extent of the scholarly and intellectual record on the Armenian Genocide and how this event conforms to the definition of the United Nations Genocide Convention. We want to underscore that it is not just Armenians who are affirming the Armenian Genocide but it is the overwhelming opinion of scholars who study genocide: hundreds of independent scholars, who have no affiliations with governments, and whose work spans many countries and nationalities and the course of decades.

Numerous international organizations have conducted studies of the events, each in turn determining that the term "genocide" aptly describes "the Ottoman massacre of Armenians in 1915–1916."[140] Among the organizations asserting this conclusion are the Xalqaro o'tish davri adolat markazi, Genotsid olimlarining xalqaro assotsiatsiyasi,[141] and the United Nations' Kamsitishlarning oldini olish va ozchiliklarni himoya qilish bo'yicha kichik komissiya.[140]

Several nations and AQSh shtatlari,[142] have passed formal legislative condemnations of the Armenian Genocide, despite intense Turkish diplomatic and economic pressure.[140] Switzerland has adopted laws that punish genotsidni rad etish.[143][144]

Chegaradagi nizo

Ararat tog'i was in ancient and medieval times at the center of Armenia.[145] Today, it is located in Turkey, though still towering over the Armenian capital of Yerevan.
Armenia-Turkey border, Ani, Shirak Province.

In the post-Soviet climate of irredentizm, Turkey was particularly wary of hard-line Armenian sentiment laying claim to the territory of "Historic Armenia" within Turkey. The Armaniston inqilobiy federatsiyasi, an Armenian political party, continues to insist on a reversion towards the Sevr shartnomasi territorial boundaries.[146] After the Ottoman Empire signed the treaty, it was rejected by Turkey after it succeeded in the Turkiya mustaqillik urushi and succeeded the empire.[147]

Armenia has officially stated that it has always recognised the current border with Turkey and, in the words of its former Foreign Minister Vardan Oskanyan, "Armenia has never made a problem of validity of the Kars shartnomasi, as Armenia remains loyal to all agreements inherited from the Soviet Union."[148]

These ongoing border disputes threatened to derail the negotiations between Armenia and Turkey prior to the announcement of the provisional road map in April 2009 with a group of Azerbaijani journalists reportedly refused permission to travel to Turkey to view renovation work on the border gate and Turkish journalist Servet Yanatma and four colleagues later being detained by Armenian authorities after attempting to film the Turkish–Armenian border without permission.[101]

Yanatma, writing in the English-language Bugungi zamon, however states that they were treated cordially and released after two hours and quotes an unnamed official as confirming that Armenia would adhere to the 1921 Kars shartnomasi and renounce any territorial claims implicit in the national constitution's description of the Turkish territory of Eastern Anatolia as G'arbiy Armaniston with the statement, "We are talking about the opening of a border. Can a border be opened if it is not recognized?"[149]

It was in response to this issue following the announcement that the Dashnak partiyasi decided to withdraw from the coalition government feeling that renunciation of Armenian territorial claims would be an unacceptably radical change in the country's foreign policy.[150]

Diplomatiya

Shuningdek qarang

Adabiyotlar

  1. ^ Arsu, Sebnem (August 31, 2009). "Turkey and Armenia to Establish Diplomatic Ties". The New York Times. Olingan 2009-09-01. Turkey and Armenia, whose century of hostilities constitutes one of the world's most enduring and acrimonious international rivalries, have agreed to establish diplomatic relations
  2. ^ "Gul in landmark visit to Armenia". Evropa. BBC yangiliklari. 2008-09-06. Arxivlandi asl nusxasidan 2008 yil 9 sentyabrda. Olingan 2008-09-12.
  3. ^ a b Paul Richter (2009-04-03). "Turkey, Armenia are likely to ease conflict". Los Anjeles Tayms. Arxivlandi asl nusxasidan 2009 yil 7 aprelda. Olingan 2009-04-03.
  4. ^ Turkey, Armenia to sign diplomatic deal next month, says official. Hurriyat. 2009 yil 27 sentyabr.
  5. ^ a b Hairenik. "President Sarkisian Announces Suspension of Protocols". Armaniston haftaligi. Olingan 24 aprel 2016.
  6. ^ "Critics 'Vindicated' By Turkish-Armenian Fiasco". «Ազատ Եվրոպա / Ազատություն» ռադիոկայան. Olingan 24 aprel 2016.
  7. ^ "Turkey - Bilateral Relations". www.mfa.am (arman tilida). Olingan 2019-12-09.
  8. ^ "Arminfo: Armenia annulled Armenian-Turkish protocols on normalization of relations". arminfo.info. Olingan 2019-12-09.
  9. ^ "The Asia's News—The Greek Insurrection". The New York Times. 1854-03-10. Olingan 2008-08-14.
  10. ^ "Unearthing the past, endangering the future". Iqtisodchi. 2007-10-18. Olingan 2008-08-14.
  11. ^ Akkam, Taner (2006). Sharmandali harakat. p.42.
  12. ^ "Fifty thousand orphans; made so by the Turkish massacres of Armenians". The New York Times. 1896-12-18. Olingan 2008-08-14.
  13. ^ Morris, Kris (2005). "Chapter 1: They've Got a Bit of History ". Yangi Turkiya. London: Granta kitoblari. pp.11–30. ISBN  1-86207-865-3.
  14. ^ Cleveland, Grover (1896-12-08) "MESSAGE OF THE PRESIDENT; Belief Expressed that Christendom Will Not Much Longer Tolerate Atrocities in Armenia. THE CUBAN MATTER DISCUSSED Conditions Under Which the United States Might Be Compelled to Intervene. THINKS THE WILSON BILL SHOULD HAVE A LONGER TRIAL. Suggests the Use of the Surplus to Meet Any Deficiency in the Treasury. WOULD RETIRE DEMAND NOTES Army and Navy Progress Commended—Post Office mill Pension Reforms Urged—General Suggestions ", The New York Times
  15. ^ "30,000 KILLED IN MASSACRES; Conservative Estimate of Victims of Turkish Fanaticism in Adana Vilayet. DEADLY WORK CONTINUES Tribesmen Besiege Towns and March on Others—Messengers to American Women Slain. CLASH FEARED AT BEIRUT Druses Gather to Avenge Murder of Deputy and Mohammedans Prepare to Oppose Them". The New York Times. 1909-04-25. Olingan 2008-08-14.
  16. ^ Luiza Nalbandyan, "The Armenian Revolutionary Movement", 1963[sahifa kerak ]
  17. ^ el-Ghusein, Fâ'iz, Martyred Armenia, (George H. Doran Co., 1918), 3.
  18. ^ Armenian SSR State Central History Archives (TsGİA Arm. SSR) fond vıpisok, folder 37, sheet 45–46, cited in K.N. Karamyan, Polojenie Zapadnıh Armyan, "ArmyanskiVopros" i Mejdunarodnaya Diplomatiya V Posledney Çetverti XIX Veka İ Naçale XX Veka, Yerevanski Gosudarstvennıy Universitet, Yerevan, 1972, p.87 vd.
  19. ^ Robert Melson, "Revolution and Genocide" (1992), 60.
  20. ^ W. Blackwood, "Blackwood's Edinburgh Magazine" (1897), 21.
  21. ^ George Shaw/Lefevre Eversley, "The Turkish Empire from 1288 to 1914" (1914), 341.
  22. ^ Arman Dzhonovich, "The Armenian Massacres, 1894–1896" (2004), 63–64.
  23. ^ "Lord Bryce's report on Armenian atrocities an appalling catalogue of outrage and massacre ", The New York Times, Lord Bryce on Armenian Atrocities Fashions Drama, Page X2, October 8, 1916.
  24. ^ John G. Heidenrich (2001). How to prevent genocide: a guide for policymakers, scholars, and the concerned citizen. Greenwood Publishing Group. p. 5. ISBN  978-0-275-96987-5.
  25. ^ "Armanistondagi frantsuzlar" genotsid "qatorida". BBC yangiliklari. 2006 yil 12 oktyabr. Arxivlandi from the original on 7 April 2008.
  26. ^ Bevan, Robert. "Cultural Cleansing: Who Remembers The Armenians ", The Destruction of Memory, Reaction Books, London. 2006, pp. 25–60
  27. ^ Balakian, Peter, The Burning Tigris (New York: HarperCollins, 2003), 208.
  28. ^ Hartunian, Abraham H., Neither to Laugh nor to Weep (Boston: Beacon Press, 1968), 54.
  29. ^ Balakian, Piter. Yonayotgan Dajla[sahifa kerak ]
  30. ^ a b "Turkish Scholars Acknowledge the Armenian Issue". Arxivlandi asl nusxasi 2007-09-26.
  31. ^ "Turkey, Constitution, Government & Legislation". Arxivlandi asl nusxasi 2007-08-12.
  32. ^ Bostom, Andrew G. (2007-08-26) "Congress Must Recognize the Armenian Genocide Arxivlandi 2007 yil 28 avgust, soat Orqaga qaytish mashinasi ", Amerika mutafakkiri. Accessed 2008-08-15.
  33. ^ Lea, Richard (2007-08-07). "Continental collisions (Maureen Freely and Elif Shafak talk to Richard Lea)". Guardian. London. p. Kitoblar. Olingan 2008-08-14.
  34. ^ Reynsford, Sara (2006-09-21). "Turk romanchilarining ishi quladi". BBC. Olingan 2008-08-14.
  35. ^ "In Turkey, ultra-nationalist lawyer wins supporters as enthusiasm for the EU falls". International Herald Tribune. Associated Press. 2006-09-05. Olingan 2008-08-14.
  36. ^ "Turkish education minister mandates teaching of Armenian genocide denial in all schools". Amerikaning Armaniston milliy qo'mitasi.
  37. ^ "Turkish Denial". Armenian National Committee of Australia.
  38. ^ Yalcin, Kemal. "You Rejoice My Heart ", Gomidas instituti, London. 2007, pp. 78–89
  39. ^ Yalçın, Kemal. You Rejoice My Heart[sahifa kerak ]
  40. ^ Speros Vryonis, Falokat mexanizmi: 1955 yil 6-7 sentyabr kunlari Turkiya Pogromi va Istanbul yunon jamoasining yo'q qilinishi., Nyu York: Greekworks.com 2005, ISBN  0-9747660-3-8
  41. ^ Hayutyan, Vasn. "Vasn Hayrenyats", ASALA, 1995[tekshirish kerak ]
  42. ^ a b AQSh Davlat departamenti. "Armenian Secret Army for the Liberation of Armenia (ASALA)". Global terrorizmning naqshlari. Arxivlandi asl nusxasidan 2008 yil 3 iyuldagi. Olingan 2008-08-14.
  43. ^ Pitman, Paul M (January 1995). "Plans for Partitioning Turkey". Turkey: Country Studies. DR417.T874 1996: Federal Research Division, Library of Congress. pp. 283, 354–355. Arxivlandi asl nusxasidan 2008 yil 12 avgustda. Olingan 2008-08-14.CS1 tarmog'i: joylashuvi (havola)
  44. ^ "U arman edi: Artin Penik". Turkish Journal. Olingan 2007-02-21.[o'lik havola ]
  45. ^ "Armenian Dies from Self-Inflicted Burns". Associated Press. 1982-08-15.
  46. ^ Freydenxaym, Milt; Giniger, Henry (1983-07-31). "THE WORLD; A New Armenian Death Mission". The New York Times. Olingan 2008-08-14.
  47. ^ "Inconvenience vs. Armenians". The New York Times. 1985-05-04. p. Late City Final Edition, Section 1, Page 26, Column 1. Olingan 2008-08-14.
  48. ^ "Armenia-Turkey: 100 years of Diplomatic Relations; Standpoint of Armenia | Aniarc". www.aniarc.am. Olingan 2018-10-22.
  49. ^ William M. Hale. Turkiya tashqi siyosati, 1774–2000, Routledge, 2000 yil, ISBN  0-7146-5071-4, p. 273
  50. ^ a b "Турция угрожает Армении не впервые: как был остановлен первый "удар"". Rusarminfo (rus tilida). Olingan 2019-12-09.
  51. ^ Rieff, David (iyun 1997). "Case Study in Ethnic Strife. (Nagorno-Karabakh)". Tashqi ishlar. Xalqaro aloqalar bo'yicha kengash. 76 (1997). doi:10.2307/20047941. JSTOR  20047941. Olingan 2008-08-14.
  52. ^ "... que la qualification de génocide, attribuée aux massacres perpétrés par les Turcs en 1915, n'était que 'la version arménienne de cette histoire.'" Herzberg, Nathaniel. Bernard Lewis condamné pour avoir nié la réalité du génocide arménien (frantsuz tilida) ("Bernard Lewis Censured For Having Denied the Reality of the Armenian Genocide"), Le Monde, p. 11, June 23, 1995: Copy of article on private website Arxivlandi 2009 yil 3-yanvar, soat Orqaga qaytish mashinasi.
  53. ^ Civil judgment finding Lewis at fault, 21 June 1995 (frantsuz tilida); English-language translation of judgment on private website Arxivlandi 2009 yil 3-yanvar, soat Orqaga qaytish mashinasi.
  54. ^ Gerard J. Libaridian. Modern Armenia: People, Nation, State, Transaction Publishers, 2004, ISBN  0-7658-0205-8, p. 245
  55. ^ "The Ties That Divide". Iqtisodchi. Global Heritage Fund. 2006-06-15. Arxivlandi asl nusxasi 2008 yil 5 aprelda. Olingan 2008-08-14.
  56. ^ "Country Report on Human Rights Practices in Armenia". AQSh Davlat departamenti. Olingan 24 aprel 2016.
  57. ^ a b Higgins, Andrew (1995-06-07). "Energy-starved Armenians risk a new Chernobyl". Mustaqil. London. Olingan 2009-05-01.
  58. ^ a b v "Nuclear threat on Turkish border". Turkiyaning Daily News. 2003-01-24. Arxivlandi asl nusxasi 2013-04-18. Olingan 2009-05-01.
  59. ^ "Turkish Atomic Energy Agency: No leakage from Armenia's Metsamor reactor". Bugungi zamon. 2007-05-09. Olingan 2009-05-01.[o'lik havola ]
  60. ^ a b v Brown, Paul (2004-06-02). "EU halts aid to Armenia over quake-zone nuclear plant". Guardian. London. Olingan 2009-05-01.
  61. ^ Armenian Genocide denial: The case against Turkey, By Alan S. Rosenbaum, Jewish News, 2007
  62. ^ a b v d e Kinzer, Stiven (2008). "Chapter 4: Ghosts". Yarim oy va yulduz. Nyu York: Farrar, Straus va Jirou. pp.87–108. ISBN  978-0-374-13143-2.
  63. ^ "Turkey planned military action against Armenia". Nordic Monitor. 2019-11-26. Olingan 2019-12-09.
  64. ^ "Aras warns of Armenian nuclear plant threat". Turkiyaning Daily News. 2003-01-24. Arxivlandi asl nusxasi 2013-04-18. Olingan 2009-05-01.
  65. ^ "Kars people to open case for the closure of Armenian nuclear plant". Turkiyaning Daily News. 2003-01-28. Olingan 2009-05-01.[doimiy o'lik havola ]
  66. ^ Alibeyoglu, Naif (2003-03-11). "Open letter to Dr. ElBaradei". Bugungi zamon. Arxivlandi asl nusxasi 2010 yil 1 fevralda. Olingan 2009-05-01.
  67. ^ Page, Jeremy (2004-11-16). "Experts fear Armenian Chernobyl". The Times. London. Olingan 2009-05-01.
  68. ^ Nedyalkova, Yordanka (2001-07-20). "Commission Formed to Improve Armenian-Turkish Relations". Olingan 2009-05-11.
  69. ^ "Ankara not expects negative decision on genocide resolution". Arxivlandi asl nusxasi 2007-09-27. Olingan 2008-08-14.
  70. ^ "Welcoming Armenian workers may boost Turkey's hand in foreign policy". Yakshanba kuni. 2009-05-10.
  71. ^ "ICTJ ruling on the Armenia Genocide" (PDF).
  72. ^ "Turkey Recalls Envoys Over Armenian". ICTJ. 2006-05-08. Arxivlandi asl nusxasi 2008-07-03 da.
  73. ^ Watson, Ivan (2005-04-26). "Turkey Pressed to Admit Armenian Genocide". Milliy radio. Olingan 2008-08-14.
  74. ^ Danielyan, Emil (2005-06-03) "Turkey, Armenia Miss Opportunity for Rapprochement ", Eurasia Insight
  75. ^ "Armenia vote splits Turkish press". BBC yangiliklari. 2006-10-12. Arxivlandi asl nusxasidan 2008 yil 14 avgustda. Olingan 2008-08-14.
  76. ^ "Turkey condemns 'genocide' vote". BBC yangiliklari. 2006-10-12. Olingan 2008-08-14.
  77. ^ a b Zand, Bernhard (2005-04-25). "Turkey's Memory Lapse: Armenian Genocide Plagues Ankara 90 Years On". Shpigel. Arxivlandi asl nusxasi 2008-09-16. Olingan 2008-08-14.
  78. ^ Tapan, Noyan (2006-06-20). "House Members Call On Eu To Encourage Turkey Reform And Recognition Of Genocide, ArmeniaDiaspora.Com
  79. ^ Karslian, Kristine (2006-12-21). "We would like to see Turkey among EU members". Yangi qo'shnilar. H2 TV Channel. Arxivlandi asl nusxasi 2007-10-17 kunlari. Olingan 2008-08-14.
  80. ^ Lobjakas, Ahto (2004-05-12). "EU: European Commission Unveils Details Of 'New Neighborhood' Strategy". Ozod Evropa radiosi. Olingan 2008-08-14.
  81. ^ a b Erel, Nursun (2006-12-04). "Armenian FM Vartan Oskanian gives exclusive interview to TNA". Yangi Anadolu. Arxivlandi asl nusxasi 2008-04-02. Olingan 2008-08-14.
  82. ^ International Association of Genocide Scholars (2005-06-13). "Letter to Prime Minister Erdogan". Genocide Watch. Arxivlandi asl nusxasi 2007 yil 4-iyunda. Olingan 2007-06-30.
  83. ^ "Declaration by the Turkish Grand National Assembly, supporting the Turkish proposal to form a joint historical commission with Armenia (2005)". Turkiya Respublikasi Tashqi ishlar vazirligi. Olingan 24 aprel 2016.
  84. ^ "Minister Oskanian Comments on Turkish Foreign Minister Abdullah Gul's Recent Remarks". Armenian Ministry of Foreign Affairs. 2006-11-04. Olingan 2007-04-23.
  85. ^ a b "Armenia ready for ties, talks with Turkey". Reuters. 2007-02-19. Olingan 2008-08-14.
  86. ^ "Armenia ready for normalization of ties, President Sargsyan says". Hurriyet Daily. 2015 yil 24 aprel. Olingan 25 dekabr 2015.
  87. ^ a b "Samast'a jandarma karakolunda kahraman muamelesi". Radikal (turk tilida). 2007-02-02. Arxivlandi asl nusxasi 2007-02-05 da. Olingan 2008-08-14.
  88. ^ Boland, Vincent (2007-01-23). "Turks flock to editor's funeral". Financial Times. Olingan 2008-08-14.
  89. ^ Danielyan, Emil (2007-04-10). "Nobel Laureates Call For Armenian-Turkish Reconciliation". Ozod Evropa / Ozodlik radiosi. Arxivlandi 2007 yil 2 iyuldagi asl nusxadan. Olingan 2007-06-30.
  90. ^ Phillips, David L. (2007-04-09). "Nobel Laureates Call For Turkish-Armenian Reconciliation" (PDF). The Elie Wiesel Foundation for Humanity. Arxivlandi asl nusxasi (PDF) 2007 yil 23 iyunda. Olingan 2007-06-30.
  91. ^ "Ankara takes Turkish agenda to Washington". Turkiyaning Daily News. 2007-02-05. Arxivlandi asl nusxasi 2007-09-30 kunlari. Olingan 2008-08-14.
  92. ^ Arsu, Sebnem; Knowlton, Brian (2007-03-30). "Planned House Vote on Armenian Massacre Angers Turks". The New York Times. Olingan 2008-08-14.
  93. ^ a b "Armenia plans nuclear plant near Turkish border". Bugungi zamon. 2007-09-10. Olingan 2011-09-06.
  94. ^ Yavuz, Ercan (2007-04-11). "Data shows increased radioactive leakage from Metsamor". Bugungi zamon. Arxivlandi asl nusxasi 2007 yil 15-iyulda. Olingan 2009-05-01.
  95. ^ Yanatma, Servet (2009-04-16). "ARF vows to prevent disrespect of Turkish flag on April 24". Bugungi zamon.
  96. ^ Eksi, Muharrem (April 2009). "Where is Turkey in NATO's Transformation into a US-EU Alliance?". 2 (1). EurasiaCritic. Iqtibos jurnali talab qiladi | jurnal = (Yordam bering)
  97. ^ "Erdoğan in bid to mend fences with Baku". Bugungi zamon. 2009-05-13.
  98. ^ O'Toole, Pam (2008-09-03). "Turkish president in Armenia trip". BBC yangiliklari. Arxivlandi asl nusxasidan 2008 yil 3 sentyabrda. Olingan 2008-09-04.
  99. ^ Hakobyan, Tatul (2008-09-13). "Armenia receives Turkey's president for six-hour visit". Armenian Reporter. Arxivlandi asl nusxasi 2008 yil 4-dekabrda. Olingan 2008-09-12.
  100. ^ "Babacan presses Armenia for joint study of genocide claims". Bugungi zamon. 2008-09-13. Olingan 2008-09-12.[o'lik havola ]
  101. ^ a b Yanatma, Servet (2009-04-13). "Turkey-Armenia deal to refer to Karabakh solution". Bugungi zamon.
  102. ^ Ünal, Mustafa (2009-04-16). "Babacan: We want Turkey, Armenia and Azerbaijan to win". Bugungi zamon.[doimiy o'lik havola ]
  103. ^ "ICG urges Turkey to normalize Armenia ties without delay". Bugungi zamon. 2009-04-16.[doimiy o'lik havola ]
  104. ^ "Turkey and Armenia move to ease tensions". Bugungi zamon. 2009-04-25.
  105. ^ "Turkey and Armenia expect gradual normalization in ties". Bugungi zamon. 2009-04-25.
  106. ^ "MHP wants transparency in Armenia talks". Bugungi zamon. 2009-04-25.
  107. ^ "Statement of President Barack Obama on Armenian Remembrance Day, 2009". Oq uyning matbuot xizmati (Matbuot xabari). 2009-04-24.
  108. ^ "Obama avoids g-word, brands Armenian killings 'great atrocity'". Bugungi zamon. 2009-04-26. Arxivlandi asl nusxasi 2009 yil 28 aprelda. Olingan 2009-04-26.
  109. ^ "Obama's message brings no relief to Ankara". Bugungi zamon. 2009-04-27.
  110. ^ "Erdoğan puts Baku's Armenia concerns to rest". Bugungi zamon. 2009-05-14.
  111. ^ "Yerevan to Erdoğan: Don't interfere in Karabakh row". Bugungi zamon. 2009-05-16.
  112. ^ "Nalbandian: Ball in Turkey's court". Bugungi zamon. 2009-05-18.
  113. ^ "Erdoğan to visit Russia next month, report says". Bugungi zamon. 2009-04-25.
  114. ^ "Erdoğan seeks Russian backing in Karabakh peace effort". Bugungi zamon. 2009-05-18.
  115. ^ a b v "Turkey-Armenia ink historic accord". Al-Jazira. 2009-10-10. Arxivlandi asl nusxasidan 2009 yil 12 oktyabrda. Olingan 2009-10-10.
  116. ^ a b "Armenia and Turkey normalise ties". BBC. 2009-10-10. Arxivlandi asl nusxasidan 2009 yil 10 oktyabrda. Olingan 2009-10-10.
  117. ^ a b "Turkey, Armenia sign deal on normalising relations". Sofiya sadosi. 2009-10-10. Olingan 2009-10-10.
  118. ^ a b Nona Mikhelidze (5 March 2010). "The Turkish-Armenian Rapprochement at the Deadlock" (PDF). IAI Istituto Affari Internazionali. p. 3. Olingan 2 iyun 2020.
  119. ^ "Protocol on the Establishment of Diplomatic Relations between the Republic of. Turkey and the Republic of Armenia" (PDF). Turkiya tashqi ishlar vazirligi. Olingan 2 iyun 2020.
  120. ^ "Relations between Turkey and Armenia". Turkiya tashqi ishlar vazirligi. Olingan 2 iyun 2020.
  121. ^ "Turkey Angry at Yerevan Over 'Land Claim' Remarks". Asbarez. 2013 yil 15-iyul. Olingan 15 iyul 2013.
  122. ^ a b Hayrumyan, Naira (11 July 2013). "Armenia and Year 2015: From Genocide recognition demand to demand for eliminating its consequences". Endi Armaniston. Olingan 11 iyul 2013.
  123. ^ "Prosecutor General: Armenia Should Have Its Territories Back". Asbarez. 2013 yil 8-iyul. Olingan 11 iyul 2013.
  124. ^ "QA-18, 12 July 2013, Statement of the Spokesman of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Turkey in Response to a Question Regarding the Declaration of the Prosecutor General of Armenia about the Border between Turkey and Armenia". Turkiya Respublikasi Tashqi ishlar vazirligi. Olingan 14 iyul 2013.
  125. ^ "Turkish Foreign Minister: Armenian Lands Claims are "Product of Delirium"". Hetq. 2013 yil 18-iyul. Olingan 23 iyul 2013.
  126. ^ Russia, Armenia unite air defenses, create regional system in the Caucasus RT, 23 December 2015.
  127. ^ "Rossiya va Armaniston Kavkazdagi havo hujumiga qarshi mudofaa tizimlarini birlashtirdi". Hurriyat Daily News. 2015 yil 24-dekabr. Olingan 25 dekabr 2015.
  128. ^ "Anqara: Rossiya-Armaniston bitimi Kavkazni qizitmoqda". Hurriyat Daily News. 2015 yil 25-dekabr. Olingan 25 dekabr 2015.
  129. ^ "Suriyaning shimoliy-sharqida Turkiyaning harbiy bosqini to'g'risida Armaniston Tashqi ishlar vazirligining bayonoti". www.mfa.am (arman tilida). Olingan 2019-10-10.
  130. ^ Fergyuson, Niall. Dunyo urushi: Yigirmanchi asr to'qnashuvi va G'arbning tushishi. Nyu-York: Penguin Press, 2006 p. 177 ISBN  1-59420-100-5
  131. ^ Xalqaro genotsid olimlari uyushmasidan xat Arxivlandi 2006 yil 16 aprel, soat Orqaga qaytish mashinasi 2005 yil 13 iyun
  132. ^ Ekstremistlar yoki mutaassiblar va hatto taniqli olimlarning Holokost yoki boshqa genotsidlarni rad etishdan psixologik qoniqishi Arxivlandi 2007-12-24 da Orqaga qaytish mashinasi, tomonidan Isroil Charni, "IDEA" jurnali, 2001 yil 17-iyul, 6-jild, №1
  133. ^ Josh Belzman (2006 yil 23 aprel). "Qarama-qarshiliklarni bartaraf etish uchun PBS harakati ko'proq narsani yaratadi". MSNBC. Arxivlandi asl nusxasi 2006 yil 22 oktyabrda. Olingan 2006-10-05.
  134. ^ Xat Arxivlandi 2006 yil 16 aprel, soat Orqaga qaytish mashinasi dan Genotsid olimlarining xalqaro assotsiatsiyasi ga Bosh Vazir Rajab Toyyib Erdo'g'an, 2005 yil 13-iyun
  135. ^ Kamiya, Gari. Genotsid: noqulay haqiqat. Salon.com. 2007 yil 16 oktyabr.
  136. ^ Jaschik, Skott. Genotsidni rad qiluvchilar. Tarix yangiliklari tarmog'i. 2007 yil 10 oktyabr.
  137. ^ "Arman genotsidi". Britannica entsiklopediyasi. Olingan 24 aprel 2016.
  138. ^ "Savol-javob va Armaniston" genotsidi'". BBC. 2006-10-12. Olingan 2006-12-29.
  139. ^ Vatson, Ivan (2006-10-04). "Shism: erkin so'z va turklikni haqorat qilish"'". Milliy jamoat radiosi. Olingan 2008-08-14.
  140. ^ a b v "Turkiya Arman genotsidi bo'yicha elchilarini chaqiradi Arxivlandi 2008 yil 3-iyul, soat Orqaga qaytish mashinasi ", Xalqaro o'tish davri adolat markazi
  141. ^ Bosh vazir Rajab Toyyib Erdo'g'anga xat Arxivlandi 2006 yil 16 aprel, soat Orqaga qaytish mashinasi, Xalqaro genotsid olimlari assotsiatsiyasi, 2005-06-13
  142. ^ "Arman genotsidi - Arman genotsidini tan olish". Olingan 24 aprel 2016.
  143. ^ "Shveytsariya sudi turklarni Arman genotsidini rad etganlikda aybdor deb topdi". Olingan 24 aprel 2016.
  144. ^ "Schweizer Radio und Fernsehen (SRF)". Olingan 24 aprel 2016.
  145. ^ "Nuh kemasini qidirishda armanlarning nuqtai nazari" (PDF).
  146. ^ "Armaniston inqilobiy federatsiyasining maqsadlari". Arxivlandi asl nusxasi 2007 yil 2 fevralda. Olingan 2006-12-29.
  147. ^ Hozirgi tarix, 13-jild, New York Times Co., 1921, "Sobiq Turkiya imperiyasini bo'linish" 441-444-betlar (2010 yil 26 oktyabrda olingan)
  148. ^ "Vartan Oskanyan so'zlarida, Turkiya o'z harakatlari bilan Kars shartnomasiga shubha qilmoqda"[1][doimiy o'lik havola ]
  149. ^ Yanatma, Servet (2009-04-15). "Armaniston chegara tan olinishiga kafolat beradi". Bugungi zamon.
  150. ^ "Matbuot yig'ilishi: Radikal". Bugungi zamon. 2009-04-28.

Tashqi havolalar