Sariq xavf - Yellow Peril

Ning irqchi multfilmi Uning butun shon-sharafidagi sariq terror (1899) kolonializmga qarshi kurashni anglatadi Tsin sulolasi G'arb dunyosini ifodalovchi yiqilgan oq tanli ayol ustida turgan xitoylik erkak.[1]

The Sariq xavf (shuningdek Sariq terror va Sariq spektr) a rang-metafora xalqlarini ifodalovchi Sharqiy Osiyo uchun mavjud bo'lgan xavf sifatida G'arbiy dunyo.[2] Sharq dunyosining psixo-madaniy tahdidi sifatida, Sariq xavfdan qo'rqish milliy emas, irqiy xarakterga ega bo'lib, o'ziga xos xavf manbai yoki biron bir xalq yoki mamlakatdan xavotir olishdan emas, balki noaniq yovuz, mavjud bo'lgan G'arb dunyosiga qarama-qarshi sariq odamlarning yuzsiz, nomsiz qo'shinlaridan qo'rqish. Shakli sifatida ksenofobiya, Sariq terror - bu Sharqdan qo'rqish, oq bo'lmagan Boshqalar, a irqchi kitobda taqdim etilgan fantaziya Oq dunyo-ustunlikka qarshi ranglarning ko'tarilishi (1920), Lotrop Stoddard tomonidan.[3]

Sariq Xavfning irqchi mafkurasi "maymunlar, kichik odamlar, ibtidoiylar, bolalar, jinnilar va maxsus kuchlarga ega bo'lgan mavjudotlarning asosiy tasavvurlaridan" kelib chiqadi. madaniy vakolatxonalar da paydo bo'lgan rangli odamlarning Yunon-fors urushlari (Miloddan avvalgi 499–449), Qadimgi Yunoniston va Fors imperiyasi; asrlar o'tib, G'arbiy imperialistik ekspansiya Sharqiy Osiyoliklarni Sariq xavf sifatida qabul qildi.[3][4]

19-asrning oxirida rus sotsiologi Jak Novikov ushbu atamani "Le Peril Jaune" ("Sariq xavf", 1897) essezida ilgari surgan, bu irqchilik Kaiser Wilhelm II (1888-1918 y.) Evropa imperiyalarini rag'batlantirish uchun ishlatgan. Xitoyni bosib olish, bosib olish va mustamlaka qilish.[5] Shu maqsadda Kayzer Sariq Xatarlar mafkurasidan foydalangan holda Yaponiyaning g'alabasini noto'g'ri ko'rsatdi Rus-yapon urushi (1904-1905) g'arbiy Evropaning oq tanli aholisi uchun Osiyo irqiy tahdidi sifatida, shuningdek ittifoqdagi kabi Xitoy va Yaponiyani fosh qildi zabt eting, itoat eting va qulga aylantiring G'arb dunyosi.

The sinolog Ving-Fay Leung bu atama va irqchilik mafkurasining hayoliy kelib chiqishini tushuntirib berdi: «Fraza sariq xavf (ba'zan sariq terror yoki sariq spektr). . . G'arbning jinsiy aloqadagi xavotirlari, o'zga sayyoralikning irqchilik qo'rquvi va boshqa narsalarini birlashtiradi Spenglerian G'arb sanoqsiz bo'lib, Sharqning quliga aylanishiga ishonish. "[6] Akademik Jina Marchetti Sharqiy osiyoliklarning psixo-madaniy qo'rquvini "O'rta asrlarda paydo bo'lgan qo'rquvga asoslanadi" deb ta'kidladi Chingizxon va Mo'g'ullarning Evropaga bosqinlari [1236–1291], Sariq xavf o'zga sayyoraliklar irqchi terrorizmini, shahvoniy tashvishlarni va G'arbni Sharqning chidab bo'lmas, qorong'u, yashirin kuchlari tomonidan g'olib chiqadi va qamrab oladi degan ishonchni birlashtiradi ";[7]:2 shuning uchun Yaponiya imperatorlik militarizmiga qarshi turish uchun G'arb Yaponiya xalqini o'z ichiga olgan holda Sariq xavf mafkurasini kengaytirdi. Bundan tashqari, 19-asr oxiri va 20-asr boshlarida yozuvchilar Sariq xavfni rivojlantirdilar adabiy topos hikoyalashning kodlangan, irqchi motivlariga, ayniqsa hikoyalar va romanlarda etnik ziddiyat janrlarida bosqinchilik adabiyoti, mustamlakachilik sarguzashtlari va ilmiy fantastika.[8][9]

Kelib chiqishi

Irqchilik va madaniy stereotiplar Sariq xavf 19-asr oxirida paydo bo'lgan, xitoylik ishchilar (turli xil teri va fiziognomiya, tili va madaniyati vakillari) qonuniy ravishda Avstraliya, Kanada, AQSh va Yangi Zelandiyaga ko'chib ketishgan, bu erda ularning ish etikasi bexosdan xitoylik jamoalarga qarshi irqchi qarama-qarshilikni keltirib chiqargan. , mahalliy oq tanlilarga qaraganda pastroq maosh olish uchun ishlashga rozi bo'lganligi uchun. 1870 yilda frantsuzlar Sharqshunos va tarixchi Ernest Renan Evropaliklarni G'arbiy dunyo uchun Sharqiy xavf haqida ogohlantirdi; hali Renan buni nazarda tutgan edi Rossiya imperiyasi (1721-1917), G'arb Evropaga qaraganda ko'proq Osiyo deb qabul qilgan mamlakat va millat.[10][11]

Imperial Germaniya

Kayzer Vilgelm II allegorik litografiyadan foydalangan Evropa xalqlari, eng muqaddas mulkingizni qo'riqlang (1895), tomonidan Hermann Knackfuss, Sariq xavf mafkurasini Xitoyda Evropa mustamlakachiligini geosiyosiy asoslash sifatida targ'ib qilish.

1870 yildan boshlab, Sariq xavf mafkurasi berdi aniq shakl Evropa va Shimoliy Amerikaning Sharqiy Osiyoga qarshi irqchiligiga.[10] Markaziy Evropada sharqshunos va diplomat Maks fon Brandt Kaiser Wilhelm II ga imperator Germaniyasining Xitoyda amalga oshiradigan mustamlakachilik manfaatlari borligini maslahat berdi.[12]:83 Demak, Kayzer bu iborani ishlatgan o'lish Gelbe Gefahr Imperial Germaniya manfaatlarini rag'batlantirish va Xitoyda Evropa mustamlakachiligini oqlash uchun (Sariq xavf).[13]

1895 yilda Germaniya, Frantsiya va Rossiya sahnaga chiqdi Uch karra aralashuv uchun Shimonoseki shartnomasi (1895 yil 17 aprel) bilan yakunlangan Birinchi Xitoy-Yaponiya urushi (1894-1895), majburlash uchun Imperial Yaponiya xitoylik mustamlakalarini evropaliklarga topshirish; bu geosiyosiy gambit zaminiga aylandi casus belli ning Rus-yapon urushi (1904–05).[12]:83[14] Kaiser Yaponiya imperiyasiga Uch karra aralashuvni oqladi irqchi G'arbiy Evropaning oq irqiga qarshi sariq irqning mavjud bo'lmagan geosiyosiy xavflariga qarshi qurol-yarog '.[12]:83

Evropani oqlash uchun madaniy gegemonlik, Kaiser allegorik litografiyadan foydalangan Evropa xalqlari, eng muqaddas mulkingizni qo'riqlang (1895), tomonidan Hermann Knackfuss, o'z geosiyosatini boshqa Evropa monarxlariga etkazish uchun. Litografiyada Germaniya Evropaning etakchisi sifatida tasvirlangan,[10][15] "Sharqdan kelgan" sariq xavf "ga qarshi bosh farishta Maykl boshchiligidagi tarixiy jangchi-ma'buda" sifatida tasvirlangan, u "juda tutunli bulut" bilan ifodalanadi. Budda, olov bilan gulchambar ".[16]:31[17]:203 Siyosiy jihatdan Knackfuss litografi Kayzer Vilgelm II ga yaqin orada bashorat qilganiga ishonishiga imkon berdi. irq urushi bu global qaror qiladi gegemonlik 20-asrda.[16]:31

Imperial Rossiya

19-asrning oxirida, bilan Sankt-Peterburg shartnomasi (1881), Tsing sulolasi (1644-1912) Xitoy sharqiy qismini tikladi Ili daryosi havza (Etishu ) dan beri Rossiya o'n yil davomida bosib olgan Dungan qo'zg'oloni (1862–77).[18][19][20] O'sha paytda, ommaviy kommunikatsiyalar ommaviy axborot vositalari G'arb vakillari Xitoyni yuksak darajadagi harbiy kuch sifatida noto'g'ri talqin qilishdi va Xitoy G'arbiy mustamlakalarni, masalan Avstraliya singari g'olib bo'lishidan irqchi qo'rquvni uyg'otish uchun Sariq Xavfsizlik mafkurasini qo'lladilar.[21]

Kanada

The Xitoy bosh solig'i har biri uchun belgilangan to'lov edi Xitoy kiruvchi kishi Kanada. The bosh soliq dan keyin birinchi bo'lib undirilgan Kanada parlamenti o'tdi 1885 yildagi Xitoy immigratsiya to'g'risidagi qonun va tugagandan so'ng xitoyliklarni Kanadaga kirishni to'xtatish uchun mo'ljallangan edi Kanadalik Tinch okean temir yo'li (CPR). Tomonidan soliq bekor qilindi 1923 yildagi Xitoy immigratsiya to'g'risidagi qonun Bu xitoyliklarning barcha immigratsiyasini to'g'ridan-to'g'ri to'sib qo'ydi, faqat ishbilarmonlar, ruhoniylar, o'qituvchilar, talabalar va boshqalar.[22]

Qo'shma Shtatlar

1854 yilda muharriri sifatida Nyu-York tribunasi, Horace Greeley xitoylik ishchilar va odamlarni Kaliforniyadan chiqarib yuborish haqidagi ommabop talabni qo'llab-quvvatlagan "Xitoyga Kaliforniyaga immigratsiya" nashrining tahririyat fikri chop etildi. "Sariq xavf" atamasini ishlatmasdan, Greeli kelganlarni taqqosladi koullar tirik qolgan afrikalik qullarga O'rta o'tish. U kelayotgan xitoyliklar orasida ozgina xristianlarni maqtab, davom etdi:

Sariq xavf: ishchilar sifatida xitoylik erkaklar ish haqi oq tanli uchun maqbul bo'lgan ish haqidan pastroq ishladilar.

Ammo qolgan narsalar haqida nima deyish mumkin? Ular aksariyat hollarda mehnatsevar, jarohatlarga bardoshli va sabrli, o'z odatlarida tinch va osoyishta odamlardir; buni ayting va siz ular haqida aytish mumkin bo'lgan barcha yaxshi narsalarni aytdingiz. Ular madaniyatsiz, nopok va har qanday tushunchadan tashqari iflos, hech qanday yuqori maishiy yoki ijtimoiy munosabatlarsiz; o'zlarining kayfiyatlarida shahvatli va shahvoniy; har bir ayol eng oddiy tartibli fohishadir; ular o'rganadigan ingliz tilidagi birinchi so'zlar odobsizlik yoki haqorat so'zlari bo'lib, bundan tashqari ular endi ko'proq o'rganishni xohlashadi.

— Nyu-York Daily Tribune, Xitoyga Kaliforniyaga immigratsiya, 1854 yil 29 sentyabr, p. 4.[23]

1870-yillarda Kaliforniya, shunga qaramay Burlingam shartnomasi (1868) Xitoydan malakasiz ishchilarning qonuniy migratsiyasiga yo'l qo'yib, mahalliy oq ishchilar sinfi AQSh hukumatidan mahalliy oq tanli amerikaliklardan ish olib ketgan xitoyliklarning "iflos sariq qo'shinlari" immigratsiyasini to'xtatishni talab qildi, ayniqsa, iqtisodiy tushkunlik.[3]

Los-Anjelesda Sariq Xavf irqchilik qo'zg'atdi 1871 yildagi Xitoy qirg'ini, unda 500 oq tanli erkak linchlangan Chinatown gettosida 20 xitoylik erkak. 1870 va 1880 yillar davomida Kaliforniya ishchilar partiyasi, demagog Denis Kerni, Sariq Xavf mafkurasini matbuotga, kapitalistlarga, siyosatchilarga va xitoylik ishchilarga qarshi siyosatida muvaffaqiyatli qo'lladi,[24] va epilog bilan nutqlarini yakunladi: "va nima bo'lishidan qat'i nazar, xitoyliklar ketishi kerak!"[25][26]:349 Xitoy xalqi, shuningdek, afyunni ishlatish va qanday qilib afyunni oq tanlilar orasida ommalashtirganligi to'g'risida axloqiy vahima qo'zg'atdi.[27] Irland-katolik immigrantlarida bo'lgani kabi, ommaviy matbuot Osiyo xalqlarini madaniy buzg'unchi sifatida noto'g'ri ko'rsatib berdi, ularning turmush tarzi AQShda respublikachilikni pasaytiradi; shuning uchun irqchi siyosiy bosim AQSh hukumatini qonun chiqarishga majbur qildi Xitoyni istisno qilish to'g'risidagi qonun (1882), 1943 yilgacha samarali immigratsiya qonuni bo'lib qoldi.[3] Bundan tashqari, 1895 yilda Kayzer Vilgelm II tomonidan ushbu atamani ishlatganligi misolida, AQShdagi mashhur matbuot Yaponiyani harbiy tahdid sifatida aniqlash va Osiyodan kelgan ko'plab muhojirlarni tavsiflash uchun "sariq xavf" iborasini qabul qildi.[28]

Bokschilar isyoni

1900 yilda mustamlakachilikka qarshi Bokschining isyoni (1899 yil avgust - 1901 yil sentyabr) Sharqiy osiyoliklarning irqchilik stereotiplarini oq odamlarga sariq xavf sifatida kuchaytirdi. Solih va hamjihat mushtlar jamiyati (bokschilar) ksenofobik jang san'ati tashkiloti bo'lib, u Xitoyning muammolarini G'arb mustamlakalari Xitoyda munosib ravishda ayblagan. Bokschilar har bir g'arbiy mustamlakachi va xristian-g'arbiylashgan xitoyliklarni o'ldirish orqali Xitoyni qutqarishga intildilar.[29]:350 1900 yil yozining boshlarida knyaz Zaiyi Chet el legionlarini qamal qilib, bokschilarni G'arb mustamlakachilari va xitoylik nasroniylarni o'ldirish uchun Pekinga kiritishdi.[29]:78–79 Keyinchalik, Ronglu, Qing Bosh qo'mondoni va Yikuang (Shahzoda Qing), qarshilik ko'rsatdi va bir necha kunlik janglardan so'ng bokschilarni Pekindan chiqarib yubordi.

G'arbiy idrok

Bokschilar qo'zg'oloni qurbonlarining aksariyati xristian nasroniylar edi, ammo xitoyliklarning qirg'inlari G'arb uchun qiziq emas edi, ular isyon ko'targan xitoyliklar tomonidan o'ldirilgan G'arb mustamlakachilaridan qasos olish uchun Osiyo qonini talab qildilar.[30] Bunga javoban Buyuk Britaniya Imperatorligi, AQSh va Imperial Yaponiya, Imperial France, Imperial Rossiya va Imperial Germaniya, Avstriya-Vengriya va Italiya Sakkiz millat ittifoqi va oxiriga etkazish uchun xalqaro harbiy ekspeditsiya kuchini yubordi Xalqaro legatsiyalarni qamal qilish Pekinda.

Sariq xavfli ksenofobiya Adolatli va Barkamol Mushtlar Jamiyatining (bokschilar) qurolli qo'zg'olonidan kelib chiqqan bo'lib, evropalik mustamlakachilarni Xitoydan quvib chiqarish uchun Bokschining isyoni (1899 yil avgust - 1901 yil sentyabr)

Rossiya matbuoti Bokschilar qo'zg'olonini irqchilik va diniy ma'noda, Oq Muqaddas Rossiya va Sariq butparast Xitoy o'rtasidagi madaniy urush sifatida namoyish etdi. Matbuot Sariq Xavfli apokalipsisni faylasufning Sinofobik she'rlaridan iqtiboslar bilan yanada qo'llab-quvvatladi Vladimir Solovyov.[31]:664 Xuddi shu tarzda matbuotda zodagonlar Osiyo tahdidiga qarshi harakat qilishni talab qildilar; Shahzoda Sergey Nikolaevich Trubetskoy Imperial Rossiya va boshqa Evropa monarxiyalarini birgalikda Xitoyni bo'linishga va Xristian olamidagi Sariq xavfni tugatishga chaqirdi.[31]:664–665 Shunday qilib, 1900 yil 3-iyulda Rossiya bokschilar qo'zg'oloniga javoban Xitoy jamoasini (5000 kishini) haydab chiqardi. Blagoveshchensk; keyin, 4-8 iyul davrida chor politsiyasi, kazak otliqlari va mahalliy hushyorlar Amur daryosida minglab xitoyliklarni o'ldirdilar.[32]

G'arbiy dunyoda, bokschining g'arbiy mustamlakachilarga qarshi zo'ravonliklari haqidagi xabar Evropada va Shimoliy Amerikada xitoyliklarning qo'zg'oloni sifatida qabul qilingan Sariq xavfli irqchilikni qo'zg'atdi. irq urushi, sariq poyga va oq poyga o'rtasida. Shu nuqtai nazardan,Iqtisodchi jurnal 1905 yilda ogohlantirgan:

Bokschi harakatining tarixi Evropa davlatlari tomonidan doimiy ravishda hushyorlik bilan munosabatda bo'lish zarurligi to'g'risida, agar millatchilik to'lqinining Samoviy imperiyani qamrab oladigan alomatlari bo'lsa, ko'plab ogohlantirishlarni o'z ichiga oladi.[30]

Oltmish bir yil o'tib, 1967 yilda Madaniy inqilob (1966–1976), Qizil gvardiya "o'ldiring! o'ldiring! o'ldiring!" deb baqirib Britaniya elchixonasiga hujum qildi va diplomatlarni kaltakladi. Diplomatning ta'kidlashicha, bokschilar xuddi shu shiordan foydalanishgan.[30]

Mustamlakachilik qasosi

Kaiser Wilhelm II, Xitoydagi Imperial Germaniya va Evropa imperializmi uchun geosiyosiy asos sifatida Yellow Peril mafkurasidan foydalangan.
Xitoy: Shohlar va ... imperatorlarning tortasi: G'azablangan Mandarin byurokrati qirolicha Viktoriya (Britaniya imperiyasi ), Kayzer Vilgelm II (Germaniya imperiyasi ), Tsar Nikolay II (Rossiya imperiyasi ), Marianne (Uchinchi Frantsiya Respublikasi ) va samuray (Yaponiya imperiyasi ) Xitoyni mustamlakalarga bo'linishini muhokama qilish.[33]

1900 yil 27-iyulda Kayzer Vilgelm II irqchi shaxsni berdi Hunnenrede (Xun nutqi) o'z askarlarini vahshiylikka undash; Imperator nemis askarlari Evropadan Xitoyga jo'nab ketib, bokschilar qo'zg'olonini bostirmoqdalar vahshiylik qilish xitoyliklarga qarshi (Bokschi va fuqarolik):[17]:203

Dushman oldiga kelganingizda uni yengishingiz kerak, afv etilmaydi, mahbuslar olinmaydi! Kim sizning qo'lingizga tushsa, qilichingizga tushadi! Xuddi ming yil oldin xunlar o'zlarining shohlari Attila davrida o'zlarining shafqatsizligi bilan nom chiqarganlar va bu an'ana hanuzgacha eslab yurgan; shuning uchun Germaniyada Germaniya nomi shu tarzda taniqli bo'lsinki, hech bir Chinaman hech qachon nemisning ko'ziga hatto ko'zini qisib qarashga jur'at eta olmaydi![17]:14

Imperial Germaniyaning ommaviy obro'siga zarar etkazishdan qo'rqib, Auswärtiges Amt (Tashqi ishlar vazirligi) irqchi barbarizmga da'vatdan chiqarib yuborilgan Hun nutqining qayta tahrir qilingan versiyasini nashr etdi. Tashqi ishlar idoralari tsenzurasidan g'azablangan Kaiser "salib yurishi tasvirlarini uyg'otdi va hozirgi inqirozni [bokschilar isyoni] Occident va Orient o'rtasidagi urushga teng deb hisoblagan" hali o'rganilmagan Hun nutqini nashr etdi. Shunga qaramay, bu "chalg'ituvchi musiqa va Sariq Xavfning yangi mafkurasi irqchi noto'g'ri tushunchaga asoslangan geosiyosiy siyosatning haqiqiy imkoniyatlari va natijalariga bog'liq emas edi".[34]:96

Vahshiylikka nasihat

Kayzer ekspeditsiya qo'mondoni feldmarshalga buyruq berdi Alfred von Valdersi, o'zini vahshiy tutish kerak, chunki xitoyliklar "tabiatan qo'rqoq, it kabi, ammo aldamchi" edilar.[34]:99 O'sha paytda, Kayzerning eng yaxshi do'sti, Shahzoda Fil von Evgenburg boshqa do'stiga Kayser Pekinni qirib tashlamoqchi va Baronni o'ldirish uchun qasos olish uchun aholini o'ldirmoqchi ekanligini yozgan. Klemens fon Ketteler, Imperator Germaniyaning Xitoydagi vaziri.[17]:13 Faqatgina Sakkiz millat ittifoqining vahshiylikdan voz kechib, legionlar qamalini hal qilishda Xitoyning Pekindagi xalqi Imperial Germaniya tomonidan tavsiya etilgan qirg'indan xalos bo'ldi.[17]:13 1900 yil avgustda ruslar, yaponlar, inglizlar, frantsuzlar va amerikalik askarlardan iborat xalqaro harbiy kuchlar Germaniyani shaharga kelguniga qadar Pekinni egallab olishdi.[34]:107

Vahshiylik praksisasi

Sakkiz davlat ittifoqi Pekinni bokschilar isyoni uchun qasos sifatida ishdan bo'shatdi; zo'rlash, talon-taroj qilish va yoqib yuborishning kattaligi G'arb harbiylari uchun "xitoyliklar odamdan kam bo'lganligi" ni ko'rsatdi.[29]:286 Shaharni ishdan bo'shatish haqida bir avstraliyalik mustamlakachi shunday dedi: "Xitoylarning kelajagi qo'rqinchli muammo. Peking ko'chalarida ko'rgan dahshatli manzaralarga qarang ... Ular atroflarini o'rab turgan iflos, yirtiq latta-puttalarni ko'ring. Ulardan o'tayotganda ularni hidlang. Ularning noma'lum axloqsizligini eshitib, ularning uyatsiz odobsizligiga guvoh bo'ling va ularni o'z xalqingiz qatorida tasavvur qiling - Uf! Bu sizni titratadi! "[29]:350

Britaniya admirali Rojer Keys buni esladi: "Har bir xitoylik ... rus va frantsuz qo'shinlari tomonidan bokschi sifatida muomala qilingan va qasos sifatida erkaklar, ayollar va bolalarni o'ldirish isyon edi".[29]:284 Amerikalik missioner Luella Miner "rus askarlarining xatti-harakati shafqatsiz, frantsuzlar unchalik yaxshi emas, va yaponlar talon-taroj qilishyapti va shafqatsiz yonmoqdalar. Ayollar va qizlar, yuzlab, rus va yapon zolimlari qo'lidan kelgan yomon taqdirdan qutulish uchun o'z joniga qasd qilishdi. "[29]:284

Britaniyalik askarlar xitoylik cholga, agar u o'z xazinasini bermasa, uni o'ldiramiz deb tahdid qilishdi. Uning xazinasi yo'qligini bilib, miltiqchi cholni o'ldirishga tayyor edi.[29]:284 Bu miltiqchini boshqa bir askar to'xtatib, unga dedi: "Yo'q, unday emas! Men uni otib tashlayman. Men har doim dum-dum [o'q] qanday jarohat olishini xohlar edim, va Masih bilan, men bu portlatilgan Chinkda birini sinab ko'rmoqchiman! "[29]:284 Xitoylik cholning yuziga o'q uzgandan so'ng, ingliz askari xitob qildi: "Masih, dum-dum uning qonli yong'og'ining orqasini uchirib yubordi!"[29]:284 Bundan tashqari, ingliz jurnalisti Jorj Linchning aytishicha, "men yozmasligim kerak bo'lgan narsalar va Angliyada bosilmasligi mumkin, bu bizning G'arb tsivilizatsiyasi shunchaki vahshiylik uchun shpon ekanligidan dalolat beradi".[29]:285

Germaniyalik feldmarshal Valdersining ekspeditsiyasi 1900 yil 27-sentyabrda - Sakkizta millat ittifoqi tomonidan bokschilar qo'zg'olonining harbiy mag'lubiyatidan so'ng Xitoyga etib keldi - ammo u qolgan bokschilarni qidirish va yo'q qilish uchun Xitoyning shimoliy qismiga 75 ta jazo reydlarini boshladi. Nemis askarlari bokschi partizanlaridan ko'ra ko'proq dehqonlarni o'ldirishdi, chunki 1900 yilning kuziga kelib Solih va Barkamol Mushtlar Jamiyati (bokschilar) hech qanday tahdid solmadi.[34]:109 1900 yil 19-noyabr kuni Reyxstag, Germaniya sotsial-demokrat siyosatchisi Avgust Bebel Kayzerning Xitoyga hujumini Germaniya uchun uyatli deb tanqid qildi:

Yo'q, bu hech qanday salib yurishi yoki muqaddas urush emas; bu juda oddiy fath urushidir. . . . So'nggi asrlarda bo'lmagan va shu qadar vahshiyona qasos kampaniyasi Tarixda umuman bo'lmagan. . . hatto Hunlar bilan ham, Vandallar bilan ham emas. . . . Bu nemis va boshqa xorijiy kuchlarning Yaponiya qo'shinlari bilan birgalikda Xitoyda qilgan ishlariga mos kelmaydi.[34]:97

Madaniy qo'rquv

Yilda O'n to'qqizinchi asrning asoslari (1899), Xyuston Styuart Chemberlen fashistik Germaniya uchun irqchilik mafkurasini taqdim etdi (1933-1945)

Sariq xavflilik irqchiligining siyosiy praksisi dunyodagi oq xalqlar o'rtasida siyosiy bo'lmagan irqiy birlikni talab qiladi. Zamonaviy (iqtisodiy, ijtimoiy, siyosiy) muammoni hal qilish uchun irqchi siyosatchi oq tanlilarga qarshi Oq birlikni talab qiladi Boshqalar uzoq Osiyodan G'arb tsivilizatsiyasiga tahdid soluvchi. G'arb davlatlari mustamlakachilarga qarshi bokschi qo'zg'olonini harbiy mag'lubiyatga uchratganiga qaramay, Xitoylik millatchilikdan qo'rqish Sariq Xavfsizlik oq tanlilar orasida madaniy omilga aylandi: bu "xitoylik irq" G'arb dunyosida xristian tsivilizatsiyasini bosib olish, mag'lub etish va ularga bo'ysundirishni anglatadi.[35]

1900 yil iyulda Völkisch harakat intellektual Xyuston Styuart Chemberlen, "Irqning Xushxabarchisi" o'zining irqchilik nuqtai nazarini madaniy ma'nosini berdi Boer urushi (1899-1902) bokschilar qo'zg'olonining madaniy mazmuni bilan bog'liq holda: "Men bir narsani aniq anglayapman, ya'ni inglizlar va gollandiyaliklarning bir-birlarini o'ldirishga, har xil murakkab sabablarga ko'ra, jinoyat hisoblanadi. Buyuk Sariq xavf bizga oq tanlilarni soya soladi va halokatga tahdid solmoqda. "[36] Kitobda O'n to'qqizinchi asrning asoslari (1899), Chemberlen irqchilik mafkurasini taqdim etdi Pan-Germanizm va Völkisch ta'sir ko'rsatgan 20-asr boshlaridagi harakatlar Fashistlar Germaniyasining irqiy siyosati.[37]

Irqiy yo'q qilish

Darvin tahdidi

Sariq xavf irqchilik avstriyalik faylasufning Christian von Ehrenfels G'arb dunyosi va Sharq dunyosi a Darvin irqiy kurashi sariq poyga g'olib bo'lgan sayyora hukmronligi uchun.[38]:258 Xitoylar o'zlarining past darajadagi irqi ekanligi Sharq madaniyati G'arbning oq madaniyatlari uchun go'yo tug'ma "barcha salohiyatlar ... qat'iyat, tashabbuskorlik, mahsuldorlik, ixtiro va tashkiliy iste'dod" yo'q edi.[38]:263 Shunga qaramay, ega bo'lishiga qaramay insoniylashtirilmagan xitoylar an essentsial stereotip jismonan beparvo va aqlsiz osiyoliklar, fon Erenfelsning madaniyati kognitiv kelishmovchilik Yaponiyani birinchi darajali maqtashga imkon berdi imperatorlik harbiy kuchi muqarrar ravishda Xitoyning qit'aviy fathini keltirib chiqaradi yaxshilangan zotlar xitoyliklar. Yaponlarning "genetik jihatdan ustun" xitoylik ayollarni tanlab olishlari "sog'lom, makkor, hiyla-nayrangli koullar" irqiga sabab bo'ladi, chunki xitoylar jinsiy reproduktiv mahoratga ega.[38]:263 Fon Erenfelsning mohiyati nigilistik irqchilik Osiyoning G'arbni zabt etishi oq irqiy qirg'in bilan tenglashishi edi; G'arbiy dunyo to'sqinlik qilolmaydigan yoki g'alaba qozona olmaydigan irqiy urush tufayli genetik jihatdan ustun bo'lgan Xitoy-Yaponiya armiyasi tomonidan bo'ysundirilgan Evropa qit'asi.[38]:263

Ko'p xotinli patriarxat

Sharq va G'arb o'rtasidagi aholining nomutanosibligini oq tanlilar foydasiga hal qilish uchun fon Erenfels fonlarni tubdan o'zgartirishni taklif qildi xulq-atvor (ijtimoiy va jinsiy xristian g'arbining me'yorlari). Yo'q qilish monogamiya genetik jihatdan ustun bo'lgan oq tanli erkakni faqat bitta ayol bilan bolalarni otalashga cheklash uchun global oq ustunlikka to'sqinlik sifatida; chunki ko'pxotinlilik irqi jihatidan ustun bo'lgan osiyolik erkakka ko'p ayolli bolalarning otasi bo'lishiga ruxsat berish uchun sariq irqga reproduktiv jihatdan katta ustunlik beradi.[38]:258–261 Shuning uchun davlat Oq odamlarning genetik va son jihatidan ustun populyatsiyalarining doimiy ravishda ko'payishini ta'minlash uchun ko'pxotinlilik orqali inson jinsiyligini boshqaradi.

Bunday patriarxal jamiyatda faqat yuqori mavqega ega bo'lgan, irsiy ishonchliligi yuqori bo'lgan oq tanli erkaklar ko'paytirish uchun qonuniy huquqga ega bo'lishlari mumkin edi, shuning uchun u reproduktiv xotinlarning soniga ega bo'lishi mumkin va shuning uchun faqat "ijtimoiy g'oliblar" o'zlarining irqiy kastalari ichida ko'payishini ta'minlaydilar. .[38]:261–262 Bunday radikallikka qaramay ijtimoiy muhandislik erkaklarning jinsiy xatti-harakatlari, Oq ayollar qoldi monogam qonun bilan; ularning hayoti xotin va onaning naslchilik funktsiyalariga bag'ishlangan.[38]:261–262 Fertil ayollar o'zlarining ko'p bolalarini birgalikda tarbiyalaydigan kazarmalarda yashashlari va kundalik hayotlarida yashashlari kerak edi. Davlat oldidagi reproduktiv majburiyatlarini bajarish uchun har bir ayolga faqat reproduktiv jinsiy aloqa uchun er beriladi.[38]:261–262 Ehrenfelsning butun dunyo uchun ijtimoiy muhandisligi Oq ustunlik yo'q qiladi romantik sevgi (nikoh) jinsiy aloqadan va shu bilan erkak va ayol jinsiy munosabatlarini mexanik ko'payish bitimiga kamaytiradi.[38]:262

Irqiy urush

G'arbiy dunyo uchun Sariq xavf xavfini tugatish uchun fon Erenfels taklif qildi Oq irqiy birlik G'arb davlatlari orasida, birgalikda sud qilish uchun oldingi urush ning etnik nizolar u harbiy jihatdan imkonsiz bo'lgunga qadar Osiyoni zabt etish. Keyin irsiy sifatida tashkil etilgan butun dunyo bo'ylab irqiy iyerarxiyani o'rnating kast tizimi boshchiligidagi Oq poyga Osiyoning har bir fath qilingan mamlakatida.[38]:264 An oligarxiya ning Oriy oq odamlar ning irqiy kastlarini tashkil qiladi, to'ldiradi va ularga rahbarlik qiladi hukmron sinf, harbiy kuchlar va ziyolilar; va har bir bosib olingan mamlakatda Sariq va Qora irqlar bo'lar edi qullar, iqtisodiy asos butun dunyo bo'ylab irqiy iyerarxiya.[38]:264

Fon Erenfels 20-asrning boshlarida taklif qilgan oriylar jamiyati G'arb dunyosining uzoq istiqbolida bo'ladi, bu Sariq xavf va Yerni boshqarish uchun boshqa irqlarni mag'lubiyatga uchratgandan so'ng amalga oshiriladi, chunki "oriylar faqat imperativga javob beradi. mo'g'ul oqimining to'lqinlari uning bo'yniga tushganda jinsiy islohotlar to'g'risida ".[38]:263 Fon Ehrenfels irqchi sifatida Yaponiyaning harbiy g'alabasini xarakterladi Rus-yapon urushi (1905) xristian g'arbidagi oq tanli xalqlarga qarshi Osiyo g'alabasi sifatida, madaniy muvaffaqiyatsizlik "insonning G'arb irqlari davom etishi uchun tubdan, jinsiy islohotning mutlaq zarurligini ko'rsatdi. [Oq irqiy masalasi" omon qolish] munozara darajasidan a darajasiga ko'tarildi ilmiy jihatdan isbotlangan haqiqat ".[38]:263

Sublimatsiya qilingan antisemitizm

Yilda Jinsiy aloqa, erkalik va "sariq xavf": Christian von Erenfelsning "Evropa jinsiy tartibini qayta ko'rib chiqish dasturi", 1902-1910 (2002), tarixchi Edvard Ross Dikkinsonning aytishicha, fon Erenfelz har doim Sariq Xavfli irqchilikni ifoda etish uchun o'lik suv metaforalaridan foydalangan. toshqin G'arbdagi xitoyliklarning; xitoy loy toshqini Evropani cho'ktirish; yaponlar a ifloslantiruvchi suyuqlik - chunki oq tanli evropaliklar demografik tahdidga qadar befarq va javob bermas edilar to'lqinlar osiyoliklarning bo'yniga etib bordi.[38]:271 Von Erenfels o'z davrining odami sifatida, ehtimol, uning erkagi haqida, xuddi irqchilikparast tarixchi asarlari bilan shug'ullanadigan o'ng qanotli zamondoshlari duch kelgan jinsiy tashvishlarga duch kelgan. Klaus Tveleyt o'rganib chiqdi va faqat fon Erenfels ekanligini ta'kidladi psixologik jihatdan prognoz qilingan uning odatiy madaniy nafratidan ko'ra, Sariq Xatar irqchiligiga qarshi jinsiy o'ziga bo'lgan shubhasi Judeo-bolshevizm, keyin turli xil antisemitizm 20-asrning boshlarida Germaniyada mashhur.[38]:271

Theweleit shuni ham ta'kidladiki, Evropa davrida urushlararo davr (1918-1939), ning irqchilikparvar asarlari Freikorps yolg'onchilar tinchlik davrida mavjud bo'lgan yagona dushmanlar "yahudiylar" va "kommunistlar" bo'lganida, ular madaniy va siyosiy mavjudotlari tahdid ostida bo'lganida, o'ldiruvchi metaforalarni namoyish etishgan. maniken o'ng qanotli evropaliklarning dunyoqarashi.[38]:271 Shunday qilib, psixologik jihatdan xavfli Freikorps fetishlangan erkaklik va siyosiy zo'ravonlik orqali o'zlarini "qattiq odamlar" deb isbotlashga intilishgan terrorizm yahudiylar va kommunistlarga qarshi; Shunday qilib, halokatli suv mudofaa mexanizmi kattalarga qarshi hissiy yaqinlik (romantik sevgi, erotizm, jinsiy aloqa) va natijada maishiylik tabiiy ravishda erkaklar va ayollar o'rtasida yuzaga keladi.[38]:271

Ksenofobiya

Germaniya va Rossiya

1895 yildan Kayzer Vilgelm Sariq Xatarlar mafkurasidan foydalanib, Imperator Germaniyani G'arbni Sharqdan bosib olishga qarshi himoyachisi sifatida ko'rsatdi.[39]:210 Izlashda Weltpolitik Germaniyani hukmron imperiya sifatida barpo etishga qaratilgan siyosat, Kayzer o'z hukumat amaldorlari, jamoatchilik fikri va boshqa monarxlarni boshqargan.[40] Tsarga yozgan xatida Rossiya Nikolay II, Kayzer shunday dedi: "Rossiya uchun Osiyo qit'asini o'stirish va Evropani Buyuk Sariq poyga yo'llaridan himoya qilish kelajakning buyuk vazifasi".[16]:31 Yilda Qonli oq baron (2009), tarixchi Jeyms Palmer Sariq Xavf mafkurasi kelib chiqqan va rivojlangan 19-asrning ijtimoiy-madaniy asoslarini quyidagicha izohlaydi:

1890-yillar G'arbda "Sariq xavf" spektrini, Osiyo xalqlarining dunyo hukmronligiga ko'tarilishini keltirib chiqardi. Keltirilgan dalillar Osiyo aholisining ko'payishi, G'arbga (xususan, Amerika va Avstraliya) immigratsiya va Rossiya chegarasida xitoyliklarning ko'payishini ko'rsatdi. Ushbu demografik va siyosiy qo'rquvlar go'yoki Sharqiy dinlar tashabbuskorlari egallagan sirli kuchlarning noaniq va dahshatli qo'rquvi bilan birga keldi. Kaiser Vilgelm II ni "Sariq xavf" atamasini yaratishga ilhomlantirgan tush tasvirlangan 1890-yillarning nemislarning hayratlanarli surati bor, bu esa ushbu g'oyalarning birligini ko'rsatmoqda. Unda bosh farishta Maykl qo'riqlagan Evropaning millatlari qahramon, ammo himoyasiz, ayol figuralari tasvirlanib, Sharqdagi tutun qorong'u bulutiga qarab, alangaga burkangan, juda sokin Buddani ushlab turadi. . . .

Shu bilan birga sekin cho'kish hissi paydo bo'ldi Abendland, G'arbning "Kechki o'lkasi". Bu Osvald Spengler kabi mutafakkirlar tomonidan eng kuchli tarzda qo'yilgan bo'lar edi G'arbning tanazzuli (1918) va Prussiya faylasufi Moeller van den Bryuk, Sharqning kelayotgan ko'tarilishi bilan ovora bo'lgan rusofon. Ikkalasi ham Germaniyani kollektivizm, "ichki barbarlik" va despotik etakchilik kabi go'yo osiyolik amaliyotlarini qabul qilish orqali Osiyodagi "yosh millatlar" ga qo'shilishga chaqirdi. Rossiyaning Osiyo bilan identifikatsiyasi, oxir-oqibat, bu kabi xushyoqishlarni engib, aksincha Rossiyaning "Osiyo barbarizmiga" qarshi Germaniyaning "G'arb" qadriyatlari bilan ozmi-ko'pmi to'g'ridan-to'g'ri birlashuviga olib keladi. Bu eng aniq edi Natsistlar davri [1933-1945], Rossiyaga qarshi har qanday tashviqotda "Osiyo millionlari" yoki "mo'g'ullar qo'shinlari" haqida gap ketganda, bu Evropani haddan tashqari boshqarish bilan tahdid qilgan, ammo ruslarni osiyolik, ayniqsa, Mo'g'ul, ichiga yaxshi davom etdi Sovuq urush davr [1917–1991].[16]:30–31

Sariq xavfning Evropa jamoaviy xotirasiga mo'g'ullar qirolning kesilgan boshini namoyish etishi kiradi Sileziyalik Genrix II, Legnica shahrida.

Kayzer Vilgelm o'zining amakivachchasi sifatida podsho Nikolay o'zining anti-Osiyo irqchiligini baham ko'rganligini bilar edi va u podshohni bekor qilishga ishontirishi mumkinligiga ishongan. Frantsiya-Rossiya ittifoqi (1894) va undan keyin Angliyaga qarshi Germaniya-Rossiya ittifoqini tuzish.[41]:120–123 Imperator nemisni manipulyatsiya qilishda Weltpolitik "Vilgelm II" sariq xavf "shiorini qasddan ishlatishi shunchaki shaxsiy g'ayrioddiylikdan iborat edi va uning hukmronligi davrida Germaniyaning tashqi siyosatining umumiy uslubiga mos tushdi, ya'ni Rossiyaning Uzoq Sharqdagi sarguzashtlarini rag'batlantirish, keyin esa Qo'shma Shtatlar o'rtasida kelishmovchiliklarni keltirib chiqarish uchun. Shtatlar va Yaponiya. Vilgelm II ning "sariq xavf" targ'ibotining mohiyati emas, balki faqat shakli Vilgelmstrasse rasmiy siyosatini bezovta qildi. "[42]

Evropadagi mo'g'ullar

19-asrda Sariq Xavf mafkurasining irqiy va madaniy stereotiplari nemislarning Rossiyani osiyolik, osiyolik millat sifatida qabul qilishlarini rang-baranglashtirdi.[16]:31 13-asrning Evropa xalq xotirasi Mo'g'ullarning Evropaga bosqini so'z qildi Mo'g'ul "Osiyo shafqatsizligi va fath qilish uchun to'ymaydigan ishtiyoq madaniyati" ning madaniy sinonimi, bu xususan Chingizxon, rahbari O'rda, Mo'g'ul O'rda.[16]:57–58

Tarixiy asosga ega bo'lishiga qaramay, Evropa jamiyatlarida Sariq Xavfli irqchilik umuman qabul qilinmadi. Frantsiya ziyolisi Anatole Frantsiya Kayzer kabi irqchi odamdan Sariq Xavf mafkurasini kutish kerakligini aytdi. Osiyo istilosining irqchilik asoslarini o'zgartirib, Frantsiya Evropa imperiyasi Osiyo va Afrikada Evropaning Oq xavf-xatari dunyo uchun haqiqiy xavf ekanligini ko'rsatdi.[10] Britaniyalik jurnalist o'zining "Sariq xavf bogi" (1904) esseida Demetrius Charlz Boulger Sariq xavf xavfli iste'mol uchun irqchi isteriya edi.[10] Dunyoning Osiyo geosiyosiy ustunligi - bu "o'qitilmagan kitobxonlar ommasi oldida joylashtirilgan istiqbol - bu xun va mo'g'ul dahshatlarini qayta tiklash va ularning nomlari Attila va Chingiz qo'rquv tuyg'usini yaratish uchun eng katta turga kiritilgan. O'quvchi, eng ijobiy tarzda, bu Yaponiyaning tashabbuskor xalqining ishi ekanligiga amin ".[43]:225 Germaniyaning Sariq Xavf mafkurasi tomonidan amalga oshirilgan muvaffaqiyatli imperatorlik fitnalari davomida Kayzerning haqiqiy geosiyosiy maqsadi Angliya edi.[43]:225

Birlashgan Qirollik

18-asr Britaniyasida xitoyliklar madaniyatli xalq deb hisoblangan bo'lsalar-da, 19-asr Britaniya imperiyasining kengayishi osiyoliklarga qarshi irqchi dushmanlikni osonlashtirdi. Xitoy xalqi tabiatan buzuq va buzuq xalq sifatida stereotipga ega edi.[44] Shunga qaramay, Sariq xavfning mashhur irqchiligidan istisnolar mavjud edi. 1890 yil may oyida, Uilyam Evart Gladstoun Avstraliyadagi xitoylarga qarshi immigratsiya qonunlarini yomon ishlarini (qimor o'yinlari va afyun chekish) jazolash o'rniga ularning mehnatsevarlik fazilatlarini (mehnatsevarlik, tejamkorlik va halollik) jazolashni tanqid qildi.[45]:25

Madaniy xarakter

1904 yilda rus-yapon urushi haqidagi uchrashuvda qirol Edvard VII Kayzerning Sariq xavf - "eng katta tahlika ... xristian olami va Evropa tsivilizatsiyasi." deb shikoyat qilganini eshitgan ruslar. Agar ruslar yengil harakat qilsalar, yigirma yil o'tgach, sariq poyga Moskva va Posenda bo'ladi ".[46] Kayzer inglizlarni Yaponiyaga qarshi Rossiyaga qarshi kurashayotgani uchun tanqid qildi va "irqqa xiyonat" bunga turtki bo'lganini aytdi. Qirol Edvard "buni ko'ra olmaganini aytdi. Yaponlar aqlli, jasur va ritsar millat, yevropaliklar singari madaniyatli bo'lib, ular faqat terilarining pigmentatsiyasi bilan ajralib turar edilar".[46]

Germaniya Kayzeridan farqli o'laroq Buyuk Britaniya qiroli Edvard VII rus-yapon urushida yaponlarni sariq xavf sifatida ko'rmadi. (1904–05)

Britaniyada Yellow Peril iborasining birinchi ishlatilishi Daily News (1900 yil 21-iyul) Bokschining isyoni "eng jiddiy ko'rinishdagi sariq xavf" sifatida.[44] O'sha paytda, inglizlar Sinofobiya, xitoyliklarning qo'rquvi barcha osiyoliklarni o'z ichiga olmadi, chunki Angliya Rossiya-Yaponiya urushi paytida Yaponiya tomonini oldi, Frantsiya va Germaniya Rossiyani qo'llab-quvvatladilar;[47]:91 kapitanning ma'ruzalari Uilyam Pakenxem "Rossiyani nafaqat Yaponiyani, balki uning dushmani sifatida tasvirlashga moyil edi".[47]:91

G'arb madaniyatida keng tarqalgan Sinofobiya haqida, yilda Sariq xavf: Doktor Fu Manchu va Chinafobiyaning ko'tarilishi (2014), tarixchi Kristofer Frayling ta'kidladi:

20-asrning o'ninchi yillarida Angliya Sinofobiya bilan g'azablandi. Hurmatli o'rta sinf jurnallari, tabloidlar va komikslar, G'arbni yo'q qilish uchun shafqatsiz xitoylik ambitsiyalarining hikoyalarini tarqatadilar. Xitoylik usta-jinoyatchi (o'zining "ayyor sariq yuzini ingichka labda burish bilan", dunyo hukmronligini orzu qilar edi) bolalar nashrlarining asosiy mahsulotiga aylandi. 1911 yilda "Angliyadagi xitoylar: o'sib borayotgan milliy muammo" maqolasi Ichki Ishlar Vazirligi atrofida tarqatilib, "dunyoning egasi, oq yoki sariq odam kim bo'lishini aniqlash uchun keng va konvulsiv Armageddon" haqida ogohlantirdi. Birinchi jahon urushidan keyin kinoteatrlar, teatr, romanlar va gazetalarda "Sariq Xavf" ning buzilgan oq jamiyatni boshqarishi haqidagi tasavvurlari aks ettirilgan. In March 1929, the muvaqqat ishlar vakili, at London's Chinese legation, complained that no fewer than five plays, showing in the West End, depicted Chinese people in "a vicious and objectionable form".[48]

Moralistic panic

The British popular imagination portrayed the Limehouse district of London as a center of moral depravity and vice, i.e. sexual prostitution, afyun smoking, and gambling.[44][48] The popular press warned of the dangers of missegenatsiya, of Chinese men marrying British women as a racial threat to white Britain, and warned that Uchlik gangsters kidnapped British women into oq qullik, "a fate worse than death" in Western popular culture.[49] In 1914, at the start of the First World War, the Hududni himoya qilish to'g'risidagi qonun was amended to include the smoking of opium as proof of moral depravity that merited deportation, a legalistic pretext for deporting the Chinese inhabitants of Britain.[49] That anti-Chinese axloqiy vahima derived from the social reality that British women were financially independent by way of war-production jobs, which allowed them the sexual freedom of men, a cultural threat to Britain's patriarchal society.[50] Hence, Yellow Peril racism was the psixologik proektsiya of European cultural and sexual prejudices against missegenatsiya onto the Chinese communities as seducing British women into libertinism.[50]

Qo'shma Shtatlar

19-asr

In the U.S., Yellow Peril xenophobia was legalized with the 1875 yilgi sahifa to'g'risidagi qonun, Xitoyni istisno qilish to'g'risidagi qonun of 1882, and the Gear akti of 1892. The Chinese Exclusion Act replaced the Burlingam shartnomasi (1868), which had encouraged Chinese migration, and provided that "citizens of the United States in China, of every religious persuasion, and Chinese subjects, in the United States, shall enjoy entire liberty of conscience, and shall be exempt from all disability or persecution, on account of their religious faith or worship, in either country", withholding only the right of naturalized citizenship.

In the Western U.S., the frequency with which racists lynched Chinese people originated the phrase, "Having a Chinaman's chance in Hell ", meaning "no chance at all" of surviving a false accusation.[51] In 1880, the Yellow Peril pogrom of Denver featured the lynching of a Chinese man and the destruction of the local Chinatown ghetto.[51] 1885 yilda Rok-Springsdagi qirg'in of 28 miners destroyed a Wyoming Chinese community.[52] Yilda Vashington hududi, Yellow Peril fear provoked the Attack on Squak Valley Chinese laborers, 1885; the arson of the Seattle Chinatown; va 1885 yilgi takoma qo'zg'oloni, by which the local white inhabitants expelled the Chinese community from their towns.[52] Sietlda Mehnat ritsarlari expelled 200 Chinese people with the 1886 yilgi Sietldagi g'alayon. In Oregon, 34 Chinese gold miners were ambushed, robbed, and killed in the Hells Canyon Massacre (1887). Moreover, concerning the experience of being Chinese in the 19th-century U.S., in the essay "A Chinese View of the Statue of Liberty" (1885), Sauum Song Bo said:

Seeing that the heading is an appeal to American citizens, to their love of country and liberty, I feel my countrymen, and myself, are honored in being thus appealed to, as citizens in the cause of liberty. But the word liberty makes me think of the fact that this country is a land of liberty for men of all nations, except the Chinese. I consider it an insult to us Chinese to call on us to contribute towards building, in this land, a pedestal for a statue of liberty. That statue represents Liberty holding a torch, which lights the passage of those of all nations who come into this country. But are Chinese allowed to come? As for the Chinese who are here, are they allowed to enjoy liberty as men of all other nationalities enjoy it? Are they allowed to go about everywhere free from insults, abuse, assaults, wrongs and injuries from which men of other nationalities are free?[53]

20-asr

To contain the Yellow Peril, the Immigration Act of 1917 established the Asiatic Barred Zone from which the U.S. admitted no immigrants.

Ostida nativist political pressure, the 1917 yilgi immigratsiya to'g'risidagi qonun established an Asian Barred Zone of countries from which immigration to the U.S. was forbidden. The 1922 yildagi kabel to'g'risidagi qonun (Married Women's Independent Nationality Act) guaranteed citizenship to independent women unless they were married to a nonwhite alien ineligible for naturalization.[54] Asian men and women were excluded from American citizenship.[55][56]

In practice, the Cable Act of 1922 reversed some racial exclusions, and granted independent-woman citizenship exclusively to women married to white men. Analogously, the Cable Act allowed the U.S. government to revoke the citizenship of an American white woman married an Asian man. The law was formally challenged before the U.S. Supreme Court, with the case of Takao Ozawa v. United States (1922), whereby a Japanese–American man tried to demonstrate that the Japanese people are a white race eligible for naturalized American citizenship. The Court ruled that the Japanese are not white people; ikki yildan so'ng 1924 yilgi milliy kelib chiqish kvotasi specifically excluded the Japanese from the US and from American citizenship.

The religious racialism of The Yellow Peril (1911, 3rd ed.), by G. G. Rupert, proposed that Russia would unite the Oriental races to invade, conquer, and subjugate Christian civilization in the Western world.
The eugenic racialism proposed in Oq dunyo-ustunlikka qarshi ranglarning ko'tarilishi (1920), tomonidan Lotrop Stoddard, presents either China or Japan as uniting the Oriental races to invade, conquer, and subjugate the white civilizations of the Western world.

Ethnic national character

To "preserve the ideal of American homogeneity", the Favqulodda kvotalar to'g'risidagi qonun of 1921 (numeric limits) and the 1924 yilgi immigratsiya to'g'risidagi qonun (fewer southern and eastern Europeans) restricted admission to the United States according to the skin color and the poyga of the immigrant.[57] In practice, the Emergency Quota Act used outdated census data to determine the number of colored immigrants to admit to the U.S. To protect WASP ethnic supremacy (social, economic, political) in the 20th century, the Immigration Act of 1924 used the twenty-year-old census of 1890, because its 19th-century demographic-group percentages favored more admissions of WASP immigrants from western and northern Europe, and fewer admissions of colored immigrants from Asia and southern and eastern Europe.[58]

To ensure that the immigration of colored peoples did not change the WASP national character of the United States, the Milliy kelib chiqishi formulasi (1921–1965) meant to maintain the joriy vaziyat percentages of "ethnic populations " in lesser proportion to the existing white populations; thus, the yearly quota allowed only 150,000 Rangli odamlar into the U.S.A. In the event, the national-origins Formula was voided and repealed with the 1965 yilgi immigratsiya va fuqarolik to'g'risidagi qonun.[59]

Eugenic apocalypse

Eugenicists used the Yellow Peril to misrepresent the U.S. as an exclusively WASP nation threatened by missegenatsiya with the Asian Other by expressing their racism with biological language (infection, disease, decay) and imagery of penetration (wounds and sores) of the white body.[60]:237–238 Yilda The Yellow Peril; or, Orient vs. Occident (1911), the tugash vaqti xushxabarchi G. G. Rupert said that Russia would unite the colored races to facilitate the Sharqiy invasion, conquest, and subjugation of the West; said white supremacy is in the Christian esxatologiya of verse 16:12 in the Vahiy kitobi: "Then the sixth angel poured out his bowl on the great Euphrates River, and it dried up so that the kings from the east could march their armies toward the west without hindrance".[61] As an Old-Testament Christian, Rupert believed the racialist doctrine of Britaniya isroilizmi, and said that the Yellow Peril from China, India, Japan, and Korea, were attacking Britain and the US, but that the Christian God himself would halt the Asian conquest of the Western world.[62]

Yilda Oq dunyo-ustunlikka qarshi ranglarning ko'tarilishi (1920), the eugenicist Lotrop Stoddard said that either China or Japan would unite the colored peoples of Asia and lead them to destroy white supremacy in the Western world, and that the Asian conquest of the world began with the Japanese victory in the Russo–Japanese War (1905). Kabi oq supremacist, Stoddard presented his racism with Biblical language and catastrophic imagery depicting a rising tide of colored people meaning to invade, conquer, and subjugate the white race.[63]

Political opposition

In that cultural vein, the phrase "yellow peril" was common editorial usage in the newspapers of publisher Uilyam Randolf Xerst.[64] In the 1930s, Hearst's newspapers realized a campaign of vilification (personal and political) against Elaine Black, an Amerika kommunisti and political activist, whom he denounced as a erkinlik "Tiger Woman" for her interracial cohabitation with the Asian man Karl Yoneda, who also was a Communist.[65] In 1931, interracial marriage was illegal in California, but, in 1935, Black and Yoneda married in Seattle, Washington, a city and a state were interracial marriage was legal.[65]

Socially acceptable Asian

In the 1930s, Yellow Peril stereotypes were common to US culture, exemplified by the cinematic versions of the Asian detectives Charli Chan (Warner Oland) and Janob Moto (Peter Lorre), originally literary detectives in novels and comic strips. White actors portrayed the Asian men and made the fictional characters socially acceptable in mainstream American cinema, especially when the villains were secret agents of Imperial Japan.[66]:159

American proponents of the Japanese Yellow Peril were the military-industrial interests of the Xitoy lobbi (right-wing intellectuals, businessmen, Christian missionaries) who advocated financing and supporting the urush boshlig'i Generalissimo Chiang Qay-shek, a Methodist convert whom they represented as the Christian Chinese savior of China, then embroiled in the Xitoy fuqarolar urushi (1927–1937, 1946–1950). After the Japanese invaded China in 1937, the China Lobby successfully pressured the U.S. government to aid Chiang Kai-shek's faction. The news media's reportage (print, radio, cinema) of the Ikkinchi Xitoy-Yaponiya urushi (1937–45) favored China, which politically facilitated the American financing and equipping of the anticommunist Gomintang, the Chiang Kai-shek faction in the civil war against the Communist faction led by Mao Tsedun.[66]:159

Pragmatic racialism

In 1941, after the Japanese Perl-Harborga hujum, the Roosevelt administration formally declared China an ally of the U.S., and the news media modified their use of Yellow Peril ideology to include China to the West, criticizing contemporary anti-Chinese laws as counterproductive to the war effort against Imperial Yaponiya.[66]:165–166 Urush davri zeitgeist and the geopolitics of the U.S. government presumed that defeat of the Imperial Japan would be followed by postwar China developing into a capitalist economy under the kuchli odam leadership of the Christian Generalissimo Chiang Qay-shek va Gomintang (Xitoy millatchi partiyasi).

In his relations with the American government and his China Lobby sponsors, Chiang requested the repeal of American anti-Chinese laws; to achieve the repeals, Chiang threatened to exclude the American business community from the "China Market", the economic fantasy that the China Lobby promised to the American business community.[66]:171–172 In 1943, the Chinese Exclusion Act of 1882 was repealed, but, because the National Origins Act of 1924 was contemporary law, the repeal was a symbolic gesture of American solidarity with the people of China.

Ilmiy fantast yozuvchi Uilyam F. Vu said that American adventure, crime, and detective pulpa jurnallari in the 1930s had many Yellow Peril characters, loosely based on Fu-manchu; although "most [Yellow Peril characters] were of Chinese descent", the geopolitics of the time led white people to see Japan as a threat to the United States. Yilda The Yellow Peril: Chinese Americans in American fiction, 1850–1940 (1982), Wu said that fear of Asians dates from the European O'rta yosh, from the 13th-century Mo'g'ullarning Evropaga bosqini. Most Europeans had never seen an Asian man or woman, and the great differences in language, custom, and physique accounted for European paranoia about the nonwhite peoples from the Eastern world.[67]

21-asr

Amerikalik akademik Frank H. Vu said that anti-Chinese sentiment incited by politicians, such as Stiv Bannon va Piter Tiel, are recycling anti-Asian hatred from the 19th century into a "new Yellow Peril" that is common to White populist politics that do not distinguish between Asian foreigners and Asian-American U.S. citizens.[68] That American cultural anxiety about the geopolitical ascent of the Xitoy Xalq Respublikasi originates in the fact that, for the first time in centuries, the Western world, led by the U.S., is challenged by a people whom Westerners viewed as culturally backward and racially inferior only a generation earlier.[69] That the U.S. perceives China as "the enemy", because their economic success voids the myth of oq ustunlik upon which the West claims cultural superiority over the East.[70] Bundan tashqari, Covid-19 pandemiyasi has facilitated and increased the occurrence of xenophobia and anti-Chinese racism, which the academic Chantal Chung said has "deep roots in yellow peril ideology".[71]

Avstraliya

In the late 19th and early 20th centuries, fear of the Yellow Peril was a cultural feature of the white peoples who sought to establish a country and a society in the Australian continent. The racialist fear of the nonwhite Asian Other was a thematic preoccupation common to invasion literature kabi romanlar The Yellow Wave: A Romance of the Asiatic Invasion of Australia (1895), The Colored Conquest (1904), The Awakening to China (1909), and the Fools' Harvest (1939). Such fantasy literature featured an Asian invasion of "the empty north" of Australia, which was populated by the Avstraliyaliklarning tub aholisi, the nonwhite, native Other with whom the white emigrants competed for living space.[72] Romanda White or Yellow?: A Story of the Race War of A.D. 1908 (1887), the journalist and labor leader Uilyam Leyn said that a horde of Chinese people legally arrived to Australia and overran white society and monopolized the industries for exploiting the natural resources of the Australian "empty north".[72]

In 1910, fear of the Yellow Peril prompted the nativist Avstraliya mahalliy aholisi assotsiatsiyasi to create the White Australia badge with which wearers could identify their racial loyalty.[73]
The Yellow Peril was used to justify the Oq Avstraliya siyosati, which excluded dark-skinned Melaneziyaliklar from immigration to Australia.

White nation

As Australian invasion literature of the 19th-century, the future history novel White or Yellow? (1887) presents William Lane's nationalist racialism va chap qanot siyosati that portrayed Australia under threat by the Yellow Peril. In the near future, British capitalists manipulate the Australian legal system and then legislate the mass immigration of Chinese workers to Australia, regardless of the socioeconomic consequences to White Australian society. Consequent to the British manipulation of Australia's economy, the resulting social conflicts (racial, financial, cultural, sexual) escalate into a race war for control of Australia.

The Yellow Peril racism in the narrative of the novel White or Yellow? justifies White Australians' killing Chinese workers as a defensive, existential response for control of Australia.[45]:26–27 Lang's story of White racial replacement appeals to the fears that labor and trade union leaders exploited to oppose the legal immigration of Chinese workers, whom they misrepresented as racial, economic, and moral threats to White Australia. That Asian libertinism threatens White Christian civilization, which theme Lang represents with missegenatsiya (mixing of the races). The fear of racial replacement was presented as an apolitical call to White racial unity in among Australians.[45]:24

Culturally, Yellow Peril invasion novels expressed themes of the White man's sexual fear of the supposed voracious sexuality of Asian men and women. The stories feature Western women in sexual peril, usually rape-by-seduction facilitated with the sensual and moral release of smoked afyun.[72] In the patriarchal world of invasion literature, interracial sexual relations were "a fate worse than death" for a white woman, afterwards, she was a sexual untouchable to white men.[72] In the 1890s, that moralistic theme was the anti-Chinese message of the feminist and labor organizer Rose Summerfield who voiced the White woman's sexual fear of the Yellow Peril, by warning society of the Chinese man's unnaturally lustful qarash upon the pulchritude of Australian women.[45]:24

Racial equality thwarted

1901 yilda Avstraliya federal hukumati qabul qildi Oq Avstraliya siyosati that had been informally initiated with the Immigratsiyani cheklash to'g'risidagi qonun 1901 yil, which generally excluded Asians, but in particular excluded the Chinese and the Melaneziya xalqlar. Tarixchi C. E. W. Bean said that the White Australia policy was "a vehement effort to maintain a high, Western standard of economy, society, and culture (necessitating, at that stage, however it might be camouflaged, the rigid exclusion of Oriental peoples)" from Australia.[74] In 1913, appealing to the irrational fear of the Yellow Peril, the film Australia Calls (1913) depicted a "Mongolian" invasion of Australia, which eventually is defeated by ordinary Australians with underground, political resistance and partizan urushi, and not by the army of the Australian federal government.[75]

In 1919, at the Parij tinchlik konferentsiyasi (28 June 1919), supported by Britain and the U.S., Australian Prime Minister Billi Xyuz vehemently opposed Imperial Japan's request for the inclusion of the Irqiy tenglik taklifi to Article 21 of the Millatlar Ligasining Kelishuvi (13 February 1919):

The equality of nations being a basic principle of the League of Nations, the High Contracting Parties agree to accord, as soon as possible, to all alien nationals of states, members of the League, equal and just treatment in every respect, making no distinction, either in law or in fact, on account of their race or nationality.[76]

Aware that Britain opposed Japanese racial equality by way of the clause in Article 21 of the Covenant, conference chairman U.S. President Vudro Uilson acted to prevent de-yure racial equality among the nations of the world, with his unilateral requirement of a unanimous vote by the countries in the League of Nations. On 11 April 1919, most countries in the conference voted to include the Racial Equality Proposal to Article 21 of the Covenant of the League of Nations; only Britain and the U.S. opposed legislated racial equality. Moreover, to maintain the White Australia policy, the Australian government sided with Britain and voted against Japan's formal request that the Racial Equality Proposal be included to Article 21 of the covenant of the League of Nations; that defeat in international relations greatly influenced Imperial Japan to confront the Western world.[77]

Frantsiya

Mustamlaka imperiyasi

In the late 19th century, French imperialist politicians invoked the Péril jaune (Yellow Peril) in their negative comparisons of France's low birth-rate and the high birth-rates of Asian countries.[78] From that racist claim arose an artificial, cultural fear among the French population that immigrant-worker Asians soon would "flood" France, which could be successfully countered only by increased fecundity of French women. Then, France would possess enough soldiers to thwart the eventual flood of immigrants from Asia.[78] From that racialist perspective, the French press sided with Imperial Russia during the Rus-yapon urushi (1904–1905), by representing the Russians as heroes defending the white race against the Japanese Yellow Peril.[79]

French Indochina: In the oriental French Empire, the country and people of Vietnam were renamed Frantsuz Hind-Xitoy. (1913)

In the early 20th century, in 1904, the French journalist René Pinon reported that the Yellow Peril were a cultural, geopolitical, and existential threat to white civilization in the Western world:

The "Yellow Peril" has entered already into the imagination of the people, just as represented in the famous drawing [Peoples of Europe, Guard Your Most Sacred Possessions,1895] of the Emperor Wilhelm II: In a setting of conflagration and carnage, Japanese and Chinese hordes spread out over all Europe, crushing under their feet the ruins of our capital cities and destroying our civilizations, grown anemic due to the enjoyment of luxuries, and corrupted by the vanity of spirit.

Hence, little by little, there emerges the idea that even if a day must come (and that day does not seem near) the European peoples will cease to be their own enemies and even economic rivals, there will be a struggle ahead to face and there will rise a new peril, the yellow man.

The civilized world has always organized itself before and against a common adversary: for the Roman world, it was the barbarian; for the Christian world, it was Islam; for the world of tomorrow, it may well be the yellow man. And so we have the reappearance of this necessary concept, without which peoples do not know themselves, just as the "Me" only takes conscience of itself in opposition to the "non-Me ": The Enemy.[26]:124

Despite the claimed Christian idealism of the civilizing mission, from the start of colonization in 1858, the French exploited the natural resources of Vietnam as inexhaustible and the Vietnamese people as beasts of burden.[80]:67–68 In the aftermath of the Second World War, the Birinchi Hindiston urushi (1946–1954) justified recolonization of Vietnam as a defense of the white West against the péril jaune — specifically that the Vetnam Kommunistik partiyasi were puppets of the People's Republic of China, which is part of the "international communist conspiracy" to conquer the world.[81] Therefore, French antikommunizm utilized orientalism to dehumanize the Vietnamese into "the nonwhite Boshqalar "; which yellow-peril racism allowed atrocities against Vetnam prisoners of war during la sale guerre ("dirty war").[80]:74 In that time, yellow-peril racism remained one of the ideological bases for the existence of Frantsuz Hind-Xitoy, thus the French news media's racialist misrepresentations of Viet Minh guerrillas being part of the innombrables masses jaunes (innumerable yellow hordes); being one of many vagues hurlantes (roaring waves) of masses fanatisées (fanatical hordes).[82]

Contemporary France

Yilda Behind the Bamboo Hedge: The Impact of Homeland Politics in the Parisian Vietnamese Community (1991) Gisèle Luce Bousquet said that the péril jaune, which traditionally colored French perceptions of Asians, especially of Vetnam xalqi, remains a cultural prejudice of contemporary France;[83] hence the French perceive and resent the Vietnamese people of France as academic overachievers who take jobs from "native French" people.[83]

In 2015, the cover of the January issue of Muzli muzli magazine featured a cartoon, Yellow Peril: Is it Already Too Late?, which depicts a Chinese-occupied Paris where a sad Frenchman is pulling a rickshaw, transporting a Chinese man, in 19th c. French colonial uniform, accompanied by a barely dressed, blonde French woman.[84][85] Muharriri Muzli muzli, Yan Lindingre, defended the magazine cover and the subject as satire and mockery of French fears of China's economic threat to France.[85] In an editorial addressing the Chinese government's complaint, Lindingre said, "I have just ordered an extra billion copies printed, and will send them to you via chartered flight. This will help us balance our trade deficit, and give you a good laugh".[85]

Italiya

In the 20th century, from their perspective, as nonwhite nations in a world order dominated by the white nations, the geopolitics of Efiopiya - Yaponiya munosabatlari ruxsat berilgan Imperial Yaponiya va Efiopiya oldini olish imperialistik Evropa mustamlaka of their countries and nations. Oldin Ikkinchi Italiya-Efiopiya urushi (1934–1936), Imperial Japan had given diplomatic and military support to Ethiopia against invasion by the Fashistik Italiya, which implied military assistance. In response to that Asian anti-imperialism, Benito Mussolini ordered a Yellow Peril propaganda campaign by the Italian press, which represented Imperial Japan as the military, cultural, and existential threat to the Western world, by way of the dangerous "yellow race–black race" alliance meant to unite Asians and Africans against the white people of the world.[86]

In 1935, Mussolini warned of the Japanese Yellow Peril, specifically the racial threat of Asia and Africa uniting against Europe.[86] In the summer of 1935, the Milliy fashistlar partiyasi (1922–43) often staged anti–Japanese political protests throughout Italy.[87] Nonetheless, as right-wing imperial powers, Japan and Italy pragmatically agreed to disagree; in exchange for Italian diplomatic recognition of Manchukuo (1932–45), the Japanese puppet state in China, Imperial Japan would not aid Ethiopia against Italian invasion and so Italy would end the anti–Japanese Yellow Peril propaganda in the national press of Italy.[87]

Meksika

Sombrero kiygan ikki kishi, eshak aravaga minib, oyoqlari orqasiga qarab chiqib ketishdi. Ular kameradan uzoqroqda, o'ng tomonda bir qator binolar joylashgan axloqsizlik ko'chasida ketmoqdalar. 1911 yil 15-may sanasi.
In Revolutionary Mexico (1910–20) a wagonload of Asian corpses is en route to a common grave after fear of the Yellow Peril fear provoked a three-day massacre (11–15 May 1911) of 308 Asian people (303 Chinese, 5 Japanese) in the city of Torreón, Coahuila, in northern Mexico.

Davomida Meksika inqilobi (1910–20), Chinese-Mexicans were subjected to racist abuse, like before the revolt, for not being Christians, specifically Rim katolik, for not being racially Meksikalik, and for not soldiering and fighting in the Revolution against the thirty-five-year dictatorship (1876–1911) of General Porfirio Dias.[88]:44

The notable atrocity against Asian people was the three-day Torreon qirg'ini (13–15 May 1911) in northern Mexico, wherein the military forces of Fransisko I. Madero killed 308 Asian people (303 Chinese, 5 Japanese), because they were deemed a cultural threat to the Mexican way of life. The massacre of Chinese- and Japanese-Mexicans at the city of Torreón, Coahuila, was not the only such atrocity perpetrated in the Revolution. Elsewhere, in 1913, after the Konstitutsiyaviy armiya captured the city of Tamasopo, San Luis Potosí state, the soldiers and the town-folk expelled the Chinese community by sacking and burning the Chinatown.[88]:44

During and after the Mexican Revolution, the Roman Catholic prejudices of Yellow Peril ideology facilitated racial discrimination and violence against Chinese Mexicans, usually for "stealing jobs" from native Mexicans. Anti–Chinese nativist propaganda misrepresented the Chinese people as unhygienic, prone to immorality (miscegenation, gambling, opium-smoking) and spreading diseases that would biologically corrupt and degenerate La Raza (the Mexican race) and generally undermining the Mexican patriarchy.[89]

Moreover, from the racialist perspective, besides stealing work from Mexican men, Chinese men were stealing Mexican women from the native Mexican men who were away fighting the Revolution to overthrow and expel the dictator Porfirio Dias and his foreign sponsors from Mexico.[90] In the 1930s, approximately 70 per cent of the Chinese and the Chinese–Mexican population was expelled from the Mexican United States by the bureaucratic ethnic culling of the Mexican population.[91]

kurka

In 1908, at the end of the Usmonli imperiyasi (1299–1922) the Yosh turk inqilobi ko'tarildi Ittifoq va taraqqiyot qo'mitasi (CUP) to power, which the 1913 yil Usmoniylar davlat to'ntarishi reinforced with the Raid on the Sublime Porte. In admiration and emulation that the modernization of Japan during the Meiji-ni tiklash (1868) was realised without the Japanese people losing their national identity, the CUP intended to modernize Turkey into the "Japan of the Near East".[92] To that end, the CUP considered allying Turkey with Japan in a geopolitical effort to unite the peoples of the Eastern world to fight a racial war of extermination against the White colonial empires of the West.[93]:54–55 Politically, the cultural, nationalist, and geopolitical affinities of Turkey and Japan were possible because, in Turkish culture, the "yellow" color of "Eastern gold" symbolizes the innate moral superiority of the East over the West.[93]:53–54

Fear of the Yellow Peril occurs against the Chinese communities of Turkey, usually as political retaliation against the PRC government's repressions and human-rights abuses against the Muslim Uighur people ichida Xinjiang province Xitoy.[94] At an anti–PRC political protest in Istanbul, a South Korean woman tourist faced violence, despite identifying herself: "I am not Chinese, I am Korean".[94] In response that Yellow Peril racism in Turkey, Davlat Baxcheli, leader of the extreme right-wing Milliyatchi harakat partiyasi, rhetorically asked: "How does one distinguish, between Chinese and Koreans? Both have slanted eyes".[94]

Janubiy Afrika

The Randlord's (mine owners') exploitive employment of Chinese labor contributed to the Liberal Party victory in the 1906 elections. (Punch magazine, 1903)

From 1904 to 1910, the Unionist Government of the Britain authorized the immigration to Janubiy Afrika of approximately 63,000 Xitoy mardikorlari to work the gold mines in the Witwatersrand havzasi after the conclusion of the Ikkinchi Boer urushi. After 1910, most Chinese miners were repatriated to China because of the great opposition to them, as "colored people", in the white society of South Africa, analogous to antiChinese laws in the US during the early 20th century.[95][96]

The mass immigration of indentured Chinese laborers to mine South African gold for wages lower than acceptable to the native white men, contributed to the electoral loss of the financially conservative British Unionist government that then governed South Africa.[97]:103

On 26 March 1904, approximately 80,000 people attended a social protest against the use of Chinese laborers in the Transvaal held in Hyde Park, London, to publicize the ekspluatatsiya ning Xitoyning Janubiy Afrikaliklari.[97]:107 The Parliamentary Committee of the Trade Union Congress then passed a resolution declaring:

That this meeting, consisting of all classes of citizens of London, emphatically protests against the action of the Government in granting permission to import into South Africa indentured Chinese labor under conditions of slavery, and calls upon them to protect this new colony from the greed of capitalists and the Empire from degradation.[98]

In the event, despite the racial violence between white South African miners and Chinese miners, the Unionist government achieved the economic recovery of South Africa after the Anglo–Boer War by rendering the gold mines of the Witwatersrand Basin the most productive in the world.[97]:103

Yangi Zelandiya

In the late 19th and the early 20th centuries, populist Prime Minister Richard Seddon compared the Chinese people to monkeys, and so used the Yellow Peril to promote irqchi politics in New Zealand. In 1879, in his first political speech, Seddon said that New Zealand did not wish her shores "deluged with Asiatic Tartarlar. I would sooner address white men than these Chinese. You can't talk to them, you can't reason with them. All you can get from them is 'No savvy'".[99]

Moreover, in 1905, in the city of Wellington, the oq supremacist Lionel Terri murdered Joe Kum Yung, an old Chinese man, in protest against Asian immigration to New Zealand. Laws promulgated to limit Chinese immigration included a heavy ovoz berish solig'i, introduced in 1881 and lowered in 1937, after Imperial Yaponiya "s bosqin va ishg'ol Xitoy. In 1944, the poll tax was abolished, and the Yangi Zelandiya hukumati formally apologized to the Chinese populace of New Zealand.[100]

Sexual fears

Fon

The core of Yellow Peril ideology is the White man's fear of seduction by the Oriental non-white Boshqalar; either the sexual voracity of the Dragon Lady va Lotus Blossom stereotypes, or the sexual voracity of the Seducer.[7]:3 Racist revulsion towards missegenatsiya — interracial sexual intercourse — by the fear of mixed-race children as a physical, cultural, and existential threat to Whiteness proper.[66]:159 Yilda Queer nazariyasi, atama Sharqiy connotes contradictory sexual associations, according to the nationality of the man. A Seducer can be perceived as Japanese and kinky or as Filipino and available. Likewise, the man can be seen as Sharqiy, and thus sexless and perverse.[101]

Jozibador

Edith Hardy (Fannie Ward) and Hishuru Tori (Sessue Hayakawa) in Cheat (1915)

The seductive Asian man (wealthy and cultured) was the common White male fear of the Asian sexual "other." The Yellow Peril sexual threat was realized by way of successful sexual competition, usually rape-seduction or rape, which rendered the woman a sexual untouchable. (qarang: Pekindagi 55 kun, 1963)[7]:3 Yilda Romance and the "Yellow Peril": Race, Sex, and Discursive Strategies in Hollywood Fiction (1994) the critic Gary Hoppenstand identified interracial sexual-intercourse as a threat to whiteness:

The threat of rape, the rape of white society dominated the yellow formula. The British or American hero, during the course of his battle against the yellow peril, overcomes numerous traps and obstacles in order to save his civilization, and the primary symbol of that civilization: white women. Stories featuring the Yellow Peril were arguments for white purity. Certainly, the potential union of the Oriental and white implied at best, a form of beastly sodomy, and at worse, a Satanic marriage. The Yellow Peril stereotype easily became incorporated into Christian mythology, and the Oriental assumed the role of the devil or demon. The Oriental rape of white woman signified a spiritual damnation for the women, and at the larger level, white society.[7]:3

  • Yilda Cheat (1915), Hishuru Tori (Sessue Hayakawa) is a sadistic Japanese sexual predator interested in Edith Hardy (Fanni Uord ), an American housewife.[7]:19–23 Although superficially G'arbiylashtirilgan, Tori's sexual sadism reflects his true identity as an Asian.[7]:16–17 In being "brutal and cultivated, wealthy and base, cultured and barbaric, Tori embodies the contradictory qualities Americans associate with Japan".[7]:19 The story initially presents Tori as an "asexual" man associating among the high society of Long Island. Once Edith is in his private study, decorated with Japanese art, Tori is a man of "brooding, implicitly sadistic sexuality".[7]:21 Before Tori attempts his rape-seduction of Edith, the story implies she corresponds his sexual interest. Tijorat muvaffaqiyati Cheat (1915) was ensured by Sessue Xayakava, a male sex symbol of that time; a sexual threat to the WASP racial hierarchy in 1915.[7]:21–22 & 25.
  • Yilda Shanxay Express (1932), General Henry Chang (Warner Oland ) is a warlord of Evroosiyo origin, presented as an asexual man, which excludes him from Western sexual mores and the racialist hierarchy; thus, he is dangerous to the Westerners he holds hostage.[7]:64 Although Eurasian, Chang is prouder of his Chinese heritage, and rejects his American heritage, which rejection confirms his Oriental identity.[7]:64 1931 yilda Xitoy fuqarolar urushi has rendered trapped a group of Westerners into traverse China by train, from Beijing to Shanghai, which is hijacked by Chang's soldiers.[7]:61 The story implies that Gen. Chang is a bisexual man who desires to rape both the heroine and the hero, Shanghai Lily (Marlen Ditrix ) and Captain Donald "Doc" Harvey (Kliv Bruk ).[7]{{rp|64} At the story's climax, Hui Fei kills Gen. Chang to save Harvey from being blinded; she explains that killing Chang restored the self-respect he took from her. Throughout the story, the narrative indicates that Shanghai Lily and Hui Fei are more attracted to each other than to Capt. Harvey, which was daring drama in 1932, because Western mores considered bisexuality an unnatural sexual orientation.[102]:232,236

Ajdaho xonimi

As a cultural vakillik of voracious Asian sexuality, the Dragon Lady is a beautiful, charming woman who readily and easily dominates men. For the White man, the Dragon Lady is the sexual Boshqalar who represents morally degrading sexual desire.[7]:3 In the cinematic genre of the Western, the cowboy town usually features a scheming Asian prostitute who uses her prettiness, sex appeal, and charisma to beguile and dominate the White man.[103] In the U.S. television program Elli Makbel (1997–2002), the Ling Vu character was a Dragon Lady whose Chinese identity includes sexual skills that no white woman possess.[104] In the late 20th century, such a sexual representation of the Yellow Peril, which was introduced in the comic strip Terri va qaroqchilar (1936), indicates that in the Western imagination, Asia remains the land of the non-white, sexual Other. To the Westerner, the seductiveness of the Orient implies spiritual threat and hidden danger to white, sexual shaxsiyat.[7]:67–68

Lotus gullari

A variant Yellow Peril seductress is presented in the white savior romance between a "White Knight" from the West and a "Lotus Blossom" from the East; each redeems the other by way of mutual romantik sevgi. Despite being a threat to the passive sexuality of white women, the romantic narrative favorably portrays the Lotus Blossom character as a woman who needs the love of a white man to rescue her from ob'ektivlashtirish by a flawed Asian culture.[7]:108–111 As a heroine, the Lotus-Blossom-woman is an ultra-feminine model of Asian pulchritude, social grace, and culture, whose own people trapped her in an inferior, gender-determined social-class. Only a white man can rescue her from such a cultural impasse, thereby, the narrative reaffirms the moral superiority G'arb dunyosi.[7]:108–111

Suzi Vong
The prostitute Suzie Wong (Nancy Kwan) working a sailor to earn her keep. (Suzi Vong dunyosi, 1960)

Yilda Suzi Vong dunyosi (1960), the eponymous anti-heroine is a prostitute saved by the love of Robert Lomax (Uilyam Xolden ), an American painter living in Hong Kong.[7]:123 The East–West sexual differences available to Lomax are two: (i) the educated British woman Kay O'Neill (Sylvia Syms ) who is independent and career-minded; and (ii) the poor Chinese woman Suzie Wong (Nensi Kvan ), a sexual prostitute who is conventionally pretty, feminine, and submissive.[7]:113–116 The cultural contrast of the vakolatxonalar of Suzie Wong and Kay O'Neill imply that to win the love of a white man, a Western woman should emulate the sexually passive prostitute rather than and independent career-woman.[7]:116 Sifatida Oriental stereotype, the submissive Lotus -Blossom (Wong) "proudly displays signs of a beating, to her fellow hookers, and uses it as evidence that her man loves her", which further increases Lomax's oq xaloskor desire to rescue Suzy.[105]

Psychologically, the painter Lomax needs the prostitute Wong as the muse who inspires the self-discipline necessary for commercial success.[7]:120 Suzie Wong is an illiterate orphan who was sexually abused as a girl; thus her toleration of abuse by most of her Chinese clients.[7]:113 Suzi Vong jinsiy aloqa ob'ekti bo'lgan xitoylik va britaniyalik erkaklardan farqli o'laroq, Lomaks ma'rifatli sifatida tasvirlangan, bu Amerika madaniyatining axloqiy ustunligini va shu tariqa AQSh gegemonligi (geosiyosiy va madaniy ) Britaniya gegemonligidan yaxshiroq bo'ladi.[7]:115 Britaniyalik dengizchi fohisha Suzi Vongni zo'rlamoqchi bo'lganida, jirkanch amerikalik Lomaks uni qutqarib, dengizchini kaltaklamoqda, xitoylik erkaklar esa fohishani zo'rlashga befarq.[7]:115 Lotus Blossom stereotipi sifatida fohisha Suzi Vong yolg'iz onadir.[7]:117 Vongga qarshi ingliz va xitoyliklarning yomon munosabatlaridan (emotsional va jismoniy) farqli o'laroq, oq xaloskor Lomaks uni bolaligida idealizatsiya qiladi va uni Lotus Blossom ijtimoiy o'ziga xosligi bilan qutqaradi, bu psixologik nuqtai nazardan paternalizmga bo'ysunadi.[7]:120–123 Shunga qaramay, Lomaksning sevgisi shartli; hikoya davomida, Vong a kiyadi Cheongsam G'arb kiyimlarini kiyganda, Lomax unga faqat xitoy kiyimlarini kiyishni buyuradi, chunki Suzi Vong faqat Lotus Blossom stereotipi sifatida qabul qilinadi.[7]:121

Kim

Musiqiy Miss Saygon (1989), Vetnamni oq qutqaruvchiga muhtoj bo'lgan Uchinchi dunyo mamlakati sifatida tasvirlaydi.[106]:34 Birinchi qo'shiqning ochilish xori "Issiqlik Saygonda" shunday boshlanadi: "Saygonda jazirama / Qizlar jahannamda jahannam / Bugun bu yoriqlardan biri Saygon Miss / Xudo bo'ladi, keskinlik baland / Yo'q hidni eslatish ".[106]:34 Saygon shahrida o'spirin fohisha Kimni stereotipik "Lotus gulasi" sifatida taqdim etadi, uning insoniy o'ziga xosligi dengiz odamlari bo'lgan oq tanli Kris Skoyini sevishi bilan belgilanadi.[106]:28–32 Ning hikoyasi Miss Saygon Vetnam ayollarini ikkita stereotip, jinsiy tajovuzkor Dragon Lady va jinsiy passiv Lotus Blossom sifatida tasvirlaydi.[106]:31–32 Tailandda, Miss Saygon har bir Tailand ayollarini fohisha sifatida noto'g'ri ko'rsatmoqda. Dreamland fohishaxonasida vetnamlik ayol Kim o'z mijozlariga bikini suzish kostyumida o'zini ko'rsatmagan yagona fohishadir.[106]:32

Adabiy sariq xavf

Romanlar

Doktor Fu Manchu (1958) - bu bolalar uchun Sariq Xatarlar mafkurasining namunasi. (san'at tomonidan Karl Burgos )

Sariq xavf-xatar mustamlakachilik sarguzashtlari uchun keng tarqalgan mavzu edi Doktor Fu Manchu romanidagi yovuz odamga o'xshash tarzda yaratilgan vakili yovuzdir Sariq xavf; Yoki, Xitoy imperiyasining bo'linishida nima bo'lishi mumkin, barcha Evropa davlatlarini chetga surib qo'yishi kerak (1898), tomonidan M. P. Shiel.[107] Xitoylik gangster Fu Manchu dunyoni zabt etishga intilgan aqldan ozgan olimdir, ammo ingliz politsiyachilari tomonidan doimo saqlanib turiladi Denis Nayland Smit va doktor Petrie, o'n uchta romanida (1913-59), tomonidan Sax Rohmer.

Fu Manchu "Sharqning eng qorong'i joylaridan" yollangan "Si-Fan" xalqaro jinoiy tashkilot va qotillarning umumiy osiyolik to'dasini boshqaradi.[108] Romanlar syujetlarida Fu-manchjurlarning Naylend Smit va doktor Petrini o'ldirish uchun qotillarni (odatda xitoy yoki hind) yuborish haqidagi takrorlanadigan sahnasi aks etgan. Sarguzashtlar paytida Naylend-Smit va Petri qotil rangli odamlar bilan o'ralgan, Rohmerning Sharqqa qarshi G'arbning buzg'unchiligi uchun Sariq Xatar metaforasi.[108] Fu-manchu seriyasi va Shielning ta'siri nuqtai nazaridan sharhlovchi Jek Adrian Saks Rohmerni

hech qanday xavf tug'dirmaydigan xavfni uyatsiz shishiruvchisi. . . bema'ni global fitnaga. U hatto bahona ham topolmadi. . . bu sharmandali yolg'onda o'zidan oldingi M.P. Kuchli irqchi bo'lgan Shiel, ba'zida yahudiylarga va Uzoq Sharq irqlariga nisbatan nafrat va dahshatni namoyish etdi. Rohmerning o'ziga xos irqchilik beparvo va beparvo edi, bu shunchaki zamon alomati edi.[109]

Sariq xavf: Ser Jon Veymut-Smitning sarguzashtlari (1978), Richard Jaccoma tomonidan, a pastiche Fu-manchu romanlari.[110] 1930-yillarda boshlangan bu voqea Dragon Lady seductress stereotipi va shafqatsizlarning distillashidir. Mo'g'ullar G'arbga tahdid soladiganlar. Birinchi shaxsning hikoyasi ser Jon Veymut-Smayt, qahramonlarga qarshi kurashuvchi, doimiy ravishda shahvoniy istak va Viktoriya pruderligi o'rtasida ajralib turadigan laxiy va dindor. Syujet - bu taqdir egasi uchun dunyoni boshqarish imkoniyatini beradigan g'ayritabiiy kuchga ega yodgorlik - Taqdir nayzasini izlash. Veymut-Smayt butun hikoya davomida "Taqdir nayzasi" ni egallash uchun Chou en Shu degan yovuz odam bilan kurashishga ko'p vaqt sarflaydi. Tematik voqealar shuni ko'rsatadiki, haqiqiy yovuz odam (fashistlar). Veymut-Smitning ko'rinadigan ittifoqchilari. Natsistlar etakchilari - Klara Shiksal, tevtonli sariq ayol, Myanma o'g'illarini qadimgi nemis xudolariga qurbon qiladi. qulash ular; keyinchalik, jazo sifatida, Veymut-Smit Klarani soddalashtiradi.[111]

The Sariq xavf (1989), Bao Mi tomonidan (Vang Lixiong ) Xitoy Xalq Respublikasida ichki urushga qadar avj olgan fuqarolar urushini taqdim etadi yadro urushi, keyin esa bu darajaga ko'tariladi Uchinchi jahon urushi. Keyin nashr etilgan Tiananmen maydonidagi 1989 yilgi norozilik namoyishlari, siyosiy bayoni Sariq xavf aksil-kommunistik xitoylarning dissident siyosatini namoyish etadi va natijada Xitoy hukumati tomonidan bostiriladi.[112]

Qisqa hikoyalar

Yilda Sariq xavf serial serial, Osiyolik yovuzlar oq qahramonga tahdid qilmoqda. (1916 yil sentyabr)[7]:3
  • Infernal urush (La Guerre infernale, 1908), tomonidan Per Giffard, tomonidan tasvirlangan Albert Robida, Ikkinchi Jahon urushi Oq odam imperiyalari o'rtasidagi kurash sifatida tasvirlangan ilmiy fantastika hikoyasidir, bu chalg'ituvchi narsa Xitoyni Rossiyaga, Yaponiya esa AQShni bosib olishiga imkon beradi, Sariq xatarli irqchilikni qo'llab-quvvatlagan holda, Robidaning rasmlarida shafqatsizlik va ruslar va amerikaliklar oq tanlilarga nisbatan qiynoqlar.[8]
  • "Li Shoun taqiqida" (1916) va "Li Shounning eng halokatli missiyasi" (1916) filmlarida, X. Irving Xenkok yomon odamni tanishtirdi Li Shoun, "dumaloq, oyga o'xshash sarg'ish yuzi", "botgan ko'zlar" ustida "qoshlari bo'rtib chiqqan" "baland va qomatli" odam. Shaxsan, Li Shoon "yovuzlikning hayratlanarli birikmasi" va aql, bu unga "har qanday yomon narsaga hayrat" va "shaytoniy hiyla-nayrangning mo''jizasi".[113]
  • Tinch okeanining xavfi (1916), J. Allan Dann tomonidan 1920 yilda Yaponiyaning hayoliy hujumi tasvirlangan AQSh materik xiyonat o'rtasidagi ittifoq tomonidan amalga oshirildi Yapon-amerikaliklar va Yaponiya imperatorlik floti. J. Allan Dannning rivoyatidagi irqchilik tili, Kaliforniyadagi yapon-amerikalik fuqarolarning mantiqsiz, Sariq xavf-xatari qo'rquvi va ular tomonidan o'zboshimchalik bilan deportatsiyadan ozod qilinganligini bildiradi. Janoblarning 1907 yildagi shartnomasi.[114]
  • "Mislsiz bosqin "(1910), Jek London tomonidan 1976-1987 yillarda sodir bo'lgan voqealar haqida hikoya qilinadi, bu Xitoyni bosib olish, bosib olish va Yerni zabt etish uchun qo'shni mamlakatlarni mustamlaka qilishga imkon berdi. O'zini himoya qilish uchun G'arbiy Dunyo Xitoydan qasos oldi bilan biologik urush (chechak, sariq isitma, vabo, Qora o'lim ). Chegaralarda G'arb armiyalari va dengiz kuchlari biologik urushdan omon qolgan va qochib qutulgan xitoyliklarni o'ldiradilar. jazo ekspeditsiyalari Xitoyda omon qolganlarni o'ldiring. Londonning irqchilik g'arbni ijobiy ta'riflaydi genotsid oqga kerak bo'lganda ko'chmanchi mustamlakachilik Xitoyning "demokratik Amerika dasturi" ga muvofiq.[115]
  • In "U "(1926), X. P. Lovecraft tomonidan, qahramon oq tanli odamga Yer sayyorasining kelajagini ko'rish uchun ruxsat beriladi va" sariq erkaklar "Oq odam dunyosi xarobalari orasida g'alaba qozonib raqs tushayotganini ko'radi. In"Red Hook-da dahshat "(1927), Nyu-Yorkdagi Red Hook-ning joyi" qiyshiq ko'zli muhojirlar oy nurlari bilan begona xudolarni sharaflash uchun nomsiz marosimlarni o'tkazadilar ".[116]

Sinematik sariq xavf

Sariq xavfli kelajak: yilda Flash Gordon olamni zabt etdi (1940), Ming shafqatsiz (Charlz Midlton) va kanizak (Karmen D'Antonio).

1930-yillarda Amerika kinoteatri (Gollivud) Sharqiy Osiyo erkaklarining qarama-qarshi obrazlarini taqdim etdi: (i) yomon niyatli usta-jinoyatchi, doktor. Fu-manchu; va (ii) xayrixoh usta-detektiv, Charli Chan.[117] Fu Manchu - "[Sak] Rohmerning hiyla-nayrangli yovuz yovuzlik [tarqatish] tarqalishi va kirib kelishining mantiqsiz qo'rquvi bilan bog'lab turadi: irqchi afsonalar ko'pincha suv toshqini, toshqin, immigrantlarning to'lqin to'lqinlari, qon daryolari bilan olib boriladi."[118]

Fu-manchu maskasi (1932) oq tanlilarning jinsiy xavotiri Sariq Xavf qo'rquvining asoslaridan biri ekanligini ko'rsatmoqda, ayniqsa Fu Manchu (Boris Karloff ) o'zining Osiyo armiyasini "Oqni o'ldir va ayollarini olib ket!"[119] Bundan tashqari, osiyoliklar orasida "g'ayritabiiy" jinsiy munosabatlarning namunasi sifatida, ota-qiz o'rtasidagi qarindoshlar o'rtasidagi nikoh - bu takrorlanadigan, hikoya qiluvchi mavzu Fu-manchu maskasi, Fu-manchu va Fah Lo Sou o'rtasidagi noaniq munosabatlar (Mirna Loy ), uning qizi.[117]

1936 yilda, fashistlar Sax Rohmerning romanlarini Germaniyada yahudiy ekanligiga ishonishgani uchun taqiqlaganlarida, Rohmer irqchilikni rad etdi va o'zini "yaxshi irlandiyalik" deb e'lon qilgan maktubni nashr etdi, ammo fashistlarning kitob taqiqlanishining sabablari to'g'risida har xil fikrlar bildirdi. chunki "mening hikoyalarim natsistlar ideallariga zid emas".[118] Ilmiy-fantastik kinoteatrda "futuristik sariq xavf" imperator tomonidan mujassamlangan Shafqatsiz Ming ning dushmani bo'lgan Fu Manchu tropining takrorlanishidir Flash Gordon; xuddi shunday, Bak Rojers 25-asrda AQShni zabt etgan sariq xavf - mo'g'ul qizillariga qarshi kurashadi.[120]

Komikslar

Yashil niqob# 6 43-bet, 1941 yil avgust, Fox Feature Syndicate, Munson Peddokning san'ati

1937 yilda noshir DC komikslari muqovasida va birinchi sonida "Ching Lung" ni namoyish etdi Dedektiv prikollar (1937 yil mart).

1950-yillarning oxirida, Atlas prikollari (Marvel Comics) nashr etilgan Sariq tirnoq, Fu-Manchu hikoyalarining pastisi. Biroq, irqchilik obrazlari o'z vaqtiga nisbatan muvozanatni muvozanatlashtirgan, bu serialning qahramoni Osiyo-Amerika FBI agenti bo'lgan, Jimmi Vu, uning asosiy raqibi bo'lgan.

1964 yilda, Sten Li va Don Xek kiritilgan, yilda Shubhasizlik haqidagi ertaklar, mandarin, Sariq xavfdan ilhomlangan nazoratchi va dushmanlik ning Marvel komikslari superqahramon Temir odam.[121] Yilda Temir odam 3 (2013), o'rnatilgan Marvel kinematik olami, Mandarin "Ten Ring" terroristik tashkilotining etakchisi sifatida namoyon bo'ladi. Toni Stark (o'ynagan Robert Dauni, kichik ) Mandarin ingliz aktyori ekanligini aniqlasa, Trevor Slattery (Ben Kingsli ) kim tomonidan yollangan Aldrich Killian (Gay Pirs ) o'zining jinoiy harakatlarining pardasi sifatida. Direktorning so'zlariga ko'ra Sheyn Black va ssenariy muallifi Drew Pirs Mandarinni yolg'onchi qilib, "Xavfli xavf" stereotipidan qochib, uni modernizatsiya qilish paytida qo'rquvdan foydalanish tomonidan harbiy sanoat kompleksi.[122]

1970-yillarda, Marvel komikslari Fu Manchu'dan o'g'lining asosiy dushmani sifatida foydalangan, Shang-Chi, Kung Fu ustasi. Keyinchalik Marvel Komikslari Fu-manchu nomiga bo'lgan huquqlarini yo'qotishi natijasida, keyinchalik paydo bo'lishi unga haqiqiy ismini berdi Zheng Zu. Kelgusi Marvel kinematik olami filmni moslashtirish, Shang-Chi va o'n uzuk afsonasi (2021), Fu Manchu "haqiqiy" Mandarin bilan almashtiriladi (Toni Leung ); buni qilish sariq xavfning ta'sirini kamaytiradi, chunki Mandarin osiyolik tomonidan qarshi chiqiladi superqahramon, Shang-Chi (Simu Liu ), Fu-manchu belgisiga havolalarni qoldirganda.[123]

Manga

Kushon Midlandga bostirib kirdi manga Berserk tomonidan Kentaro Miura, bir nechta hikoyali yoylarda Kushanlar tomonidan Midlandning tinch dehqonlariga qilingan qirg'inlar va qonli shafqatsizliklar tasvirlangan (Sharqiy jangchilarning ko'rinishi bilan).

Shuningdek qarang

Izohlar

  1. ^ "Sariq dahshat butun shon-sharafida". Ogayo shtati universiteti. Olingan 13 iyun 2020.
  2. ^ Odijie, Maykl (2018). "" Sariq xavf "qo'rquvi va Evropa federalistik harakati paydo bo'lishi". Xalqaro tarix sharhi. 40 (2): 359. doi:10.1080/07075332.2017.1329751.
  3. ^ a b v d Yang, Tim (2004 yil 19 fevral). "Sariq xavf-xatarning yomon, ammo o'zgarmas tabiati". Dartmut kolleji. Arxivlandi asl nusxasidan 2015 yil 2 yanvarda. Olingan 18 dekabr 2014.
  4. ^ Dower, Jon. "Irqiy urush naqshlari" 283–87 betlar, yilda Sariq xavf! Osiyoga qarshi qo'rquv arxivi, Jon Kuo Vey Tchen va Dilan Yits, Eds. London: Verso, 2014 285–86 betlar.
  5. ^ Jon Ruhl. Kayzer va uning sudi: Vilgelm II va Germaniya hukumati, Kembrij universiteti matbuoti, 1994. p. 203.
  6. ^ Leung, Wing Fai (2014 yil 16-avgust). "Sharq tushunchasi - sariq xavf: Osiyoga qarshi qo'rquv arxivi". Irish Times. Arxivlandi asl nusxasidan 2014 yil 29 avgustda. Olingan 4 yanvar 2015.
  7. ^ a b v d e f g h men j k l m n o p q r s t siz v w x y z aa ab Marchetti, Jina (1994). Romantik va "sariq xavf": Gollivud fantastikasidagi irq, jinsiy aloqa va diskursiv strategiyalar. Kaliforniya universiteti matbuoti. ISBN  9780520914629.
  8. ^ a b Iannuzzi, Giulia (2017). Albert Robidaning illyustratsiyalaridagi shafqatsiz tasavvur: kelajakdagi o'tmishdagi sharqiy qiynoqlar La Guerre infernale (1908). Trieste Edizioni Università. ISBN  9788883038426. Arxivlandi asl nusxasidan 2019 yil 6 aprelda. Olingan 6 aprel 2019.
  9. ^ Adabiyot uchun qo'llanma, To'rtinchi nashr (1980), C. Xyu Xolman, Ed., 444–445, 278–279-betlar.
  10. ^ a b v d e Tsu, Tszyan. Muvaffaqiyatsizlik, millatchilik va adabiyot: zamonaviy xitoy identifikatsiyasini yaratish, 1895–1937 Stenford: Stenford universiteti matbuoti, 2005 y. 80.
  11. ^ * Rojer Debury (taxallus Jorj Rossignol), Un pays de célibataires et de fils noyob narsalar, Dentu, 1897: "Le péril jaune n'est pas immédiat et ne vise pas spécialement la France".
    • Tomas Burk, Limehouse Nights, 1916 yil: "Orkestrdagi ba'zi bolalar tez-tez qichqiriq xavfi ostida ishlashga qarshi chiqishgan, ammo u mohir musiqachi edi va menejment zalga sharqona elementni jalb qilgani uchun uni ushlab turdi. chorak ”.
    • JB Nyuman, Yangi boshlanuvchilarning zamonaviy tarixi: Milodiy 1000 yildan, World Book Company, 1922: "... agar" uyqusirab, uning cheksiz boyliklaridan to'liq foydalanishi kerak bo'lsa, "Yell օ w xavfiga" yoki umuman olganda dunyo uchun yuzaga kelishi mumkin bo'lgan xavfga ishonadiganlar bor. "
  12. ^ a b v Akira, Iikura. "Sariq xavf" va uning nemis-yapon munosabatlariga ta'siri ", 80-97 betlar, yilda Yaponiya-Germaniya munosabatlari, 1895–1945: Urush, diplomatiya va jamoatchilik fikri, Christian W. Spang va Rolf-Harald Wippich, Eds. London: Routledge, 2006 yil.
  13. ^ Rupert, G. G. Sariq xavf yoki Sharq bilan voqea, Union Publishing, 1911. p. 9.
  14. ^ Egasi. Rus-yapon urushi tarixiy lug'ati, p. 375.
  15. ^ Keyn, Daniel C. kirish Au Yaponiya, Yaponiya, Koreya va Xitoydagi xorijiy muxbirning xotiralari, 1892–1894, de Gervil, A.B. G'arbiy Lafayet, Ind: Parlor Press, 2009 p. xxix.
  16. ^ a b v d e f Palmer, Jeyms (2009). Qonli oq baron. Nyu-York: asosiy kitoblar. ISBN  978-0-465-01448-4.
  17. ^ a b v d e Rul, Jon C. G. (1996). Kayzer va uning sudi: Vilgelm II va Germaniya hukumati. Terence F. Cole tomonidan tarjima qilingan (qayta nashr etilgan, tasvirlangan nashr). Kembrij universiteti matbuoti. ISBN  0521565049.
  18. ^ 19-asr dunyosining tarixiy atlasi, 1783-1914. Barnes va Noble kitoblari. 1998. p. 5.19. ISBN  978-0-7607-3203-8.
  19. ^ "Arxivlangan nusxa". Arxivlandi asl nusxasidan 2016 yil 2 martda. Olingan 27 may 2016.CS1 maint: nom sifatida arxivlangan nusxa (havola)
  20. ^ Devid Skott (2008 yil 7-noyabr). Xitoy va Xalqaro Tizim, 1840–1949: Qo'rquv Asrida Kuch, Borliq va Tushunchalar. SUNY Press. 104-105 betlar. ISBN  978-0-7914-7742-7. Arxivlandi asl nusxasidan 2016 yil 23 iyulda. Olingan 13 fevral 2016.
  21. ^ Devid Skott (2008 yil 7-noyabr). Xitoy va Xalqaro Tizim, 1840–1949: Qo'rish Asrida Kuch, Borliq va Tushunchalar. SUNY Press. 111-112 betlar. ISBN  978-0-7914-7742-7. Arxivlandi asl nusxasidan 2016 yil 5 iyuldagi. Olingan 13 fevral 2016.
  22. ^ Morton, Jeyms. 1974 yil. Steril tog'lar dengizida: Britaniya Kolumbiyasidagi xitoyliklar. Vankuver: J.J. Duglas.
  23. ^ "Kaliforniyadagi xitoylik immigratsiya 1854 yil 29-sentyabr" NY Tribune ".. Nyu-York tribunasi. 1854 yil 29 sentyabr. P. 4. Olingan 17 iyul 2020.
  24. ^ Maklin, Charlz J. Tenglikni izlash: Xitoy XIX asrdagi Amerikada kamsitishga qarshi kurash, Berkli: Kaliforniya universiteti matbuoti, 1994; p. 79.
  25. ^ Gyori, Endryu. Darvozani yopish: irq, siyosat va Xitoyni chetlatish to'g'risidagi qonun Chapel Hill, NC: Shimoliy Karolina universiteti matbuoti, 1998; p. 111.
  26. ^ a b Vey Txen, Jon Kuo, Dilan Yits Sariq xavf! Osiyoga qarshi qo'rquvning arxivi London: Verso, 2014 yil
  27. ^ Meri Ting Yi Lui. Chinatown magistral sirlari: qotillik, nasldor nasl-nasab va asrning Nyu-York shahridagi boshqa xavfli uchrashuvlar. Prinston universiteti matbuoti. 27-32 betlar.
  28. ^ Rouse, Vendi (2015 yil noyabr). "Djyu-jitsuit Sem amaki: Jiu-Jitsuning g'ayritabiiy san'ati va AQShning Progressiv davridagi sariq xavf tahdidi". Tinch okeanining tarixiy sharhi. 84 (4): 450. doi:10.1525 / phr.2015.84.4.448.
  29. ^ a b v d e f g h men j Preston, Diana Bokschilar isyoni, Nyu-York: Berkli kitoblari, 2000 yil
  30. ^ a b v "Odil musht". Iqtisodchi. 16 dekabr 2010 yil. Arxivlandi asl nusxasidan 2014 yil 8 dekabrda. Olingan 18 dekabr 2014.
  31. ^ a b Eskrij-Kosmach, Alena. "Rossiya matbuoti va Rossiyaning" Sharqdagi maxsus missiyasi "va" sariq xavf "g'oyalari", 661-75 betlar, Slavyan harbiy tadqiqotlar jurnali, 27-jild, 2014 yil noyabr
  32. ^ Oleg Anatelevich Timofeev (Oleg Anatolyevich Timofeyev). "Rossiysko-kitayskie otnosheniya v Priamury (ser. XIX - nach. XX vv.)" Arxivlandi 2015 yil 24 sentyabr Orqaga qaytish mashinasi Amur mintaqasidagi Rossiya-Xitoy munosabatlari, 19-asr o'rtalari - 20-asr boshlari 2-qism. Blagoveshchensk (2003).
  33. ^ "En Chine Le gâteau des Rois et ... des Empereurs" - Multfilm, Le Petit Journal, 1898 yil 16-yanvar; Ingliz tili: "Xitoy - shohlar va ... imperatorlarning tortasi"
  34. ^ a b v d e Mombauer, Annika. "Wilhelm II, Waldersee va Boxer isyoni". 91–118 betlar, Kaiser, Annika Mombauer va Wilhelm Deist, Eds. Kembrij: Kembrij universiteti matbuoti, 2003 yil, ISBN  978-0521824088
  35. ^ Preston (2000) 350-351 betlar
  36. ^ Maydon, Jefri. Irqning xushxabarchisi: Xyuston Styuart Chemberlenning germaniyalik qarashlari, Nyu-York: Columbia University Press (1981) p. 357.
  37. ^ Mitcham, Samuel W., Jr. (1996). Nega Gitler ?: Natsist reyxining yaratilishi. Westport, Konnektikut: Praeger. p. 82. ISBN  978-0-275-95485-7.; Formanga asoslanib, Jeyms D. (1978) Natsizm, Nyu York. 14-bet
  38. ^ a b v d e f g h men j k l m n o p q Dikkinson, Edvard Ross (2002). "Jinsiy aloqa, erkalik va" sariq xavf ": Christian von Erenfelsning" Evropa jinsiy tartibini qayta ko'rib chiqish dasturi, 1902-1910 ". Germaniya tadqiqoti. 25 (2): 255–284. doi:10.2307/1432992. JSTOR  1432992. PMID  20373550.
  39. ^ Xervig, Xolger. "Sharh: Deutschland, Amerika und die "Gelbe Gefahr". Zur Karriere Schinesworts in the Gro Groen Politik 1905–1917, Ute Mehnert tomonidan "210–211 betlar, Xalqaro tarixni ko'rib chiqish, 19-jild, 1-son, 1997 yil fevral. JSTOR  40108116
  40. ^ Barth, Gunther (1997). "Sharh Germaniya, Amerika va "sariq xavf": xalqaro siyosatdagi shiorning karerasi, 1905–1917, Ute Mehnert tomonidan ". Amerika tarixi jurnali. 84 (1): 264. doi:10.2307/2952828. JSTOR  2952828.
  41. ^ Maklin, Roderik. "Germaniya Evropasi orzulari: Vilgelm II va 1905 yildagi Byörko shartnomasi" 119–41 betlar, Kaiser, Annika Mombauer va Wilhelm Deist, Eds. Kembrij: Kembrij universiteti matbuoti, 2003 yil, ISBN  978-0521824088
  42. ^ Fiebig-fon Xeyz, Ragnhld. "" Do'stlik "dan foydalanish: Vilgelm II va Teodor Ruzveltning" shaxsiy rejimi "143–175 betlar, Kaiser, Annika Mommbauer va Wilhelm Deist, Eds. Kembrij: Kembrij universiteti matbuoti, 2003 p. 165.
  43. ^ a b Iikura, Akira. "Angliya-Yaponiya ittifoqi va irq masalasi", 222-34 betlar, yilda Angliya-Yaponiya Ittifoqi, 1902–1922, Flibs O'Brian, Ed. London: Routledge, 2003 yil.
  44. ^ a b v Frantsiya, Filipp (2014 yil 20 oktyabr). "Sariq xavf: doktor Fu Manchu va xinofobiyaning ko'tarilishi". Kuzatuvchi. Arxivlandi asl nusxasidan 2014 yil 25 dekabrda. Olingan 4 yanvar 2015.
  45. ^ a b v d Auerbax, Sascha. Imperator Britaniyadagi irq, qonun va "Xitoy jumboqlari", London: Makmillan, 2009 yil
  46. ^ a b MacDonogh, Giles. Oxirgi Kaiser, Nyu-York: St. Martin matbuoti, 2003. p. 277.
  47. ^ a b Jyuks, Jefri. Rossiya-Yaponiya urushi 1904-1905, London: Osprey 2002 yil.
  48. ^ a b Louell, Julia (2014 yil 30 oktyabr). "Sariq xavf: doktor Fu Manchu va xinofobiyaning ko'tarilishi". Guardian. Arxivlandi asl nusxasidan 2015 yil 5 yanvarda. Olingan 4 yanvar 2015.
  49. ^ a b Witchard, Anne (2014 yil 13-noyabr). "Xitoyni yozish: Anne Witchard" Angliyaning sariq xavfiga'". Wall Street Journal. Arxivlandi asl nusxasidan 2015 yil 5 yanvarda. Olingan 4 yanvar 2015.
  50. ^ a b Jodugar, Anne (2015 yil 4-fevral). "Sariq xavf: Sinofobiya va Buyuk urush: Doktor Anne Vitchard bilan savol-javob". Los Anjeles Tayms. Arxivlandi asl nusxasidan 2015 yil 3 aprelda. Olingan 19 aprel 2015.
  51. ^ a b "Shuhratparast Lynchings". 20 oktyabr 2014. Arxivlangan asl nusxasi 2017 yil 20-may kuni. Olingan 4 yanvar 2015.
  52. ^ a b "1885–1886 yillarda Xitoyga qarshi isteriya". Xitoy-Amerika tajribasi 1857-1892. HarpWeek. Arxivlandi asl nusxasidan 2006 yil 19 avgustda. Olingan 4 yanvar 2015.
  53. ^ Bo, Sauum Song. "Ozodlik haykaliga xitoycha qarash", 232–233 betlar, Sariq xavf !: Osiyoga qarshi qo'rquv arxivi, John Kuo Wei Tchen, John Kuo va Dylan Yeats tomonidan tahrirlangan, London: Verso, 2014. p. 232.
  54. ^ "Prolog: Tanlangan maqolalar". Archives.gov. Arxivlandi asl nusxasidan 2019 yil 3-iyulda. Olingan 17 avgust 2012.
  55. ^ "O'qituvchi uchun - Osiyo Amerika tarixiga kirish". Apa.si.edu. 1942 yil 19-fevral. Arxivlandi asl nusxasidan 2009 yil 16 yanvarda. Olingan 17 avgust 2012.
  56. ^ "Osiyo Amerika tarixi xronologiyasi". Raqamli tarix. Arxivlandi asl nusxasi 2009 yil 22 aprelda.
  57. ^ "1924 yilgi immigratsiya to'g'risidagi qonun (Jonson-Rid to'g'risidagi qonun)". AQSh tarixchi davlat idorasi bo'limi. Arxivlandi asl nusxasidan 2019 yil 16-noyabrda. Olingan 13 fevral 2012.
  58. ^ "1924 yilgi immigratsiya to'g'risidagi qonun (Jonson-Rid to'g'risidagi qonun)". AQSh tarixchi davlat idorasi bo'limi. Arxivlandi asl nusxasidan 2019 yil 16-noyabrda. Olingan 13 fevral 2012.
  59. ^ "1924 yilgi immigratsiya to'g'risidagi qonun (Jonson-Rid to'g'risidagi qonun)". AQSh tarixchi davlat idorasi bo'limi. Arxivlandi asl nusxasidan 2019 yil 16-noyabrda. Olingan 13 fevral 2012.
  60. ^ Shimakava, Karen. "Milliy e'tiroz" 236–41 betlar, Sariq xavf! Osiyoga qarshi qo'rquvning arxivi, Jon Kuo Vey Tchen va Dilan Yits, Eds. London: Verso, 2014 yil
  61. ^ "Vahiy 16:12 (Jeymsning yangi qiroli versiyasi)". BibleGateway.com. Arxivlandi asl nusxasidan 2007 yil 18-noyabrda. Olingan 5 noyabr 2007.
  62. ^ "Nyu-Yorkdagi" Sariq xavfning arxivchisi "ko'rgazmasi". Boas Blog. 19 Avgust 2006. Arxivlangan asl nusxasi 2007 yil 13 oktyabrda. Olingan 5 noyabr 2007.
  63. ^ Stoddard, Lotrop. "Rangning ko'tarilayotgan to'lqinlari" 216–17-betlar, Sariq xavf! Osiyoga qarshi qo'rquvning arxivi, Jon Kuo Vey Tchen va Dilan Yits, Eds. London: Verso, 2014 yil.
  64. ^ "Chet el yangiliklari: yana, sariq xavf". Vaqt. 1933 yil 11-sentyabr. Arxivlandi asl nusxasidan 2010 yil 30 avgustda. Olingan 2 yanvar 2010.
  65. ^ a b Estrada, Uilyam Devid. Los-Anjeles Plazmasi: Muqaddas va bahsli makon Ostin: Texas universiteti matbuoti, 2008 p. 166.
  66. ^ a b v d e Dower, Jon. Rahmsiz urush: Tinch okeanidagi urush va kuch, Nyu-York: Pantheon 1993 yil
  67. ^ Katayama, Liza (2008 yil 29-avgust). "Sariq xavf, fu-manchjur va etnik kelajak". Io9.com. Arxivlandi asl nusxasidan 2016 yil 6 martda. Olingan 17 avgust 2012.
  68. ^ Vu, Frank H. (17 iyul 2019). "Techning zamonaviy" sariq xavf "qo'rqitishlari - bu xuddi o'sha eski irqchilikdir | Frank X Vu". Guardian. Olingan 13 may 2020.
  69. ^ Nair, Chandran. "AQShning Xitoyning Huawei kompaniyasidan xavotiri sariq xavfning davomi".. Osiyoda ushbu hafta.
  70. ^ Pauers, Martin. "AQShda G'arbiy ustunlik haqidagi afsonalarda Xitoyga qarshi kurash olib borilmoqda". Osiyoda ushbu hafta.
  71. ^ "Yangi sariq xavf? - G'arbda Xitoyga qarshi kayfiyat". Shimoli-sharqiy universiteti siyosiy sharhi. 18 mart 2020 yil. Olingan 13 may 2020.
  72. ^ a b v d Affeldt, Stefanie (2011 yil 12-iyul). "'Milliy identifikatsiya va irqiy poklik uchun "sariq xavf" ga qarshi oq shakar " (PDF). Oksford universiteti. Arxivlandi asl nusxasi (PDF) 2014 yil 15 mayda. Olingan 4 yanvar 2015.
  73. ^ Qarang Viktoriya muzeyining tavsifi Arxivlandi 2016 yil 5-yanvar kuni Orqaga qaytish mashinasi
  74. ^ Bean, C. E. W. (2014) ANZAC Amiensga; Pingvin kitoblari, p. 5.
  75. ^ Sartarosh, Lynden (2010 yil 11 sentyabr). "Sariq xavfli isteriya boshlangan kechagi esankiragan sadolar". Avstraliyalik. Arxivlandi asl nusxasi 2015 yil 18-yanvarda. Olingan 4 yanvar 2015.
  76. ^ Gordon Lauren, Pol (1978). "Tarixda inson huquqlari: Parijdagi tinchlik konferentsiyasida diplomatiya va irqiy tenglik". Diplomatik tarix. 2 (3): 257–278. doi:10.1111 / j.1467-7709.1978.tb00435.x.
  77. ^ Makmillan, p. 321.
  78. ^ a b Kuk Anderson, Margaret. Imperiya orqali qayta tiklanish: frantsuz pronatalistlari va uchinchi respublikada mustamlakachilik, Linkoln: Nebraska universiteti matbuoti, 2014 p. 25.
  79. ^ Beillevaire, P. X. "L'opinion publique française face à la guerre russo-japonaise" yilda Cipango, cahiers d'études japonaises, 9-jild, 2000 yil kuz, 185–232 betlar.
  80. ^ a b Beygbeder, Iv. Harbiy jinoyatlar va qiynoqlarni sud qilish Frantsiya adliya va xalqaro jinoiy sudlar va komissiyalar (1940–2005), Brill: Martinus Nixhoff, 2006 yil, ISBN  9789004153295
  81. ^ Shafer, Maykl (2014). O'limga olib keladigan paradigmalar: AQSh qarshi qo'zg'olon siyosatining muvaffaqiyatsizligi. Prinston: Prinston universiteti matbuoti. p. 145. ISBN  978-0-691-60924-9.
  82. ^ Kuper, Nikola (2000). "Qahramonlar va shahidlar: Hindxitoy urushi davrida frantsuz armiyasining o'zgaruvchan afsonaviy holati". Xolmanda Valeriya; Kelly, Debra (tahrir). Yigirmanchi asrdagi urush paytida Frantsiya. Oksford: Bergaxn. 126–141 betlar [p. 132]. ISBN  1-57181-701-8.
  83. ^ a b Busket, Jizel Lyu (1991). Bambuk to'siq orqasida: Vatan siyosatining Parij Vetnam jamoatchiligiga ta'siri. Ann Arbor: Michigan universiteti. p. 75. ISBN  0-472-10174-9.
  84. ^ Long, Simon (22 yanvar 2015). "Xavfdan qochish". Iqtisodchi. Arxivlandi asl nusxasidan 2015 yil 1 fevralda. Olingan 1 fevral 2015.
  85. ^ a b v "Frantsuz komiksining" Sariq xavf "qopqog'i Xitoy qog'ozini bezovta qilmoqda". Frantsiya 24. 20 Yanvar 2015. Arxivlangan asl nusxasi 2017 yil 29 iyunda. Olingan 1 fevral 2015.
  86. ^ a b Klark, Jozef Kalvitt Rangli xalqlar ittifoqi: Ikkinchi jahon urushidan oldin Efiopiya va Yaponiya, Woodbridge: Boydell & Brewer, 2011 p. 70
  87. ^ a b Ransdell, Jim; Bardshaw, Richard (2011 yil 31 oktyabr). "1930-yillarda Yaponiya, Buyuk Britaniya va Afrikadagi Sariq xavf". Osiyo-Tinch okeani jurnali. 9 (2). Arxivlandi asl nusxasidan 2015 yil 22 martda. Olingan 1 fevral 2015.
  88. ^ a b Ritsar, Alan. Meksika inqilobi: 2-jild aksilinqilob va qayta qurish, Kembrij: Kembrij universiteti matbuoti, 1987 yil
  89. ^ Kurtis, Jeyms R. (1995 yil iyul). "Mexicali's Chinatown". Geografik sharh. Nyu York. 85 (3): 335–349. doi:10.2307/215277. JSTOR  215277.
  90. ^ Schiavone Camacho, Julia Mariya (2009 yil noyabr). "Chegaralarni kesib o'tish, Vatanga da'vo qilish: Meksikaning xitoyliklarning transkassifik sayohati, 1930-1960 yillar". Tinch okeanining tarixiy sharhi. Berkli. 78 (4): 545–577. doi:10.1525 / phr.2009.78.4.545. JSTOR  10.1525 / phr.2009.78.4.545.
  91. ^ Kampos-Riko, Ivonne Virjiniya (2003). La Formación de la Comunidad China en Mexico: políticas, migración, antichinismo y relaciones socialculturales (tezis) (ispan tilida). Mexiko shahri: Escuela Nacional de Antropología e Historia (INAH-SEP). p. 108.
  92. ^ Worringer, Renée (2004 yil may). "'"Evropaning kasal odami" yoki "Yaqin Sharqning Yaponiyasi" ?: Hamidiy va yosh turk davrlarida Usmonli zamonaviyligini qurish ". Yaqin Sharq tadqiqotlari xalqaro jurnali. 36 (2): 207–230. doi:10.1017 / S0020743804362033. JSTOR  3880032.
  93. ^ a b Worringer, Renee. (2014) Usmonlilar Yaponiyani tasavvur qilishmoqda: Sharq, Yaqin Sharq va G'arbdan tashqari zamonaviylik XX asr boshlarida, London: Palgrave.
  94. ^ a b v "Turkiyani xitoyliklarga qarshi norozilik namoyishlari". Iqtisodchi. 2015 yil 11-iyul. Arxivlandi asl nusxasidan 2015 yil 2 avgustda. Olingan 4 avgust 2015.
  95. ^ "Janubiy Afrikada Xitoy yangi qora". Wall Street Journal. 19 iyun 2008 yil. Arxivlandi asl nusxasidan 2009 yil 24 iyuldagi. Olingan 4 avgust 2017.
  96. ^ Park, Yoon Jung (2009). Yaqinda Xitoyning Janubiy Afrikaga ko'chishi - irq, sinf va etnik guruhning yangi chorrahalari (PDF). Taqdimot, ifoda va shaxs. Fanlararo istiqbollar. ISBN  978-1-904710-81-3. Arxivlandi asl nusxasi (PDF) 2010 yil 28 dekabrda. Olingan 20 sentyabr 2010.
  97. ^ a b v Yap, Melani; Leong Man, Dainne (1996). Rang, chalkashlik va imtiyozlar: Xitoyning Janubiy Afrikadagi tarixi. Gonkong: Gonkong universiteti matbuoti. p. 510. ISBN  962-209-423-6.
  98. ^ Hyde Parkdagi Buyuk Namoyishning rasmiy dasturi, [S.l.:s.n.]; Richardson (1904). Transvaaldagi xitoylik minalar mehnati. London: Kasaba uyushmalari Kongressining parlament qo'mitasi. 5-6 betlar.
  99. ^ Burdon, Randal Metyus. King Dik: Richard Jon Seddonning tarjimai holi, Whitcombe & Tombs, 1955, 43-bet.
  100. ^ "Xitoylik muhojirlardan olinadigan ovoz berish solig'i bekor qilindi". Yangi Zelandiya tarixi. 1944 yil 15-dekabr. Olingan 6 iyun 2020.
  101. ^ Fung, Richard (1991). "Mening olatni qidiryapman: Erotizatsiyalangan osiyo gey-video porno-da". Yomon ob'ekt tanlovida (tahrir). Ko'rinishim qanday? Queer video va film. Sietl-Beydagi matbuot. p. 147.
  102. ^ Chan, Entoni, Doimiy ravishda salqin: Anna May Vongning ko'plab hayotlari Lanxem: Rowman & Littlefield, 2003 yil
  103. ^ Dhingra, Pavan, Rodiguez, Robin Magalit. Osiyo Amerika: Sotsiologik va fanlararo istiqbollar, London: Polity Press, 2014 p. 29.
  104. ^ Fam, Vinsent. Ono, Kent. Osiyolik amerikaliklar va ommaviy axborot vositalari, London: Polity, 2009 bet 68-70.
  105. ^ Butler, Kreyg (2015 yil 22-yanvar). "Suzi Vong dunyosiga sharh". Allmovie. Arxivlandi asl nusxasidan 2014 yil 8 iyunda. Olingan 5 mart 2015.
  106. ^ a b v d e Shimakava, Karen. Milliy norozilik, Durham: Dyuk universiteti matbuoti, 2002 y
  107. ^ "Shiel, M P" Arxivlandi 2017 yil 19-yanvar kuni Orqaga qaytish mashinasi. 2015 yil 20-mayda qayta ko'rib chiqilgan. Ilmiy fantastika entsiklopediyasi (sf-encyclopedia.com). 2015 yil 22-oktabrda olingan. Kirish "EFB / JC" yoki Everett F. Bler va Jon Klyut.
  108. ^ a b Seshagiri, Urmila "Zamonaviylik (sariq) xavf-xatarlar" 211-16 betlar, Sariq xavf !: Osiyoga qarshi qo'rquv arxivi, Jon Kuo Vey Tchen va Dilan Yits, Eds. London: Verso, 2014 yil.
  109. ^ Adrian, Jek. "Rohmer, Sax" 482–84-betlar, Sent-Jeyms dahshat, arvoh va gotik yozuvchilar uchun qo'llanma, Devid Pringl, Ed. Detroyt: Sent-Jeyms Press, 1997 yil.
  110. ^ Richard Jekkoma (1978). "Sariq xavf": Ser Jon Veymut-Smitning sarguzashtlari: roman. Richard Marek Publishers. ISBN  0-399-90007-1.
  111. ^ Kenni, Djo (2013 yil 21-iyun). "Sariq xavf: Jon Veymut-Smitning sarguzashtlari, Richard Jakomaning muallifi". Arxivlandi asl nusxasidan 2015 yil 27 aprelda. Olingan 16 dekabr 2014.
  112. ^ "1999 yilgi Jahon matbuot erkinligi sharhi". IPI Xalqaro Matbuot Instituti. Arxivlandi asl nusxasi 2007 yil 12 oktyabrda. Olingan 5 noyabr 2007.
  113. ^ "Detektiv hikoya" jurnali (1916), p. 000.
  114. ^ Dann, J. Allan. Tinch okeanining xavfi, Traildan tashqari nashrlar (2011). ISBN  978-1-935031-16-1
  115. ^ "Mislsiz bosqin". Jek London onlayn to'plami. Arxivlandi asl nusxasi 2014 yil 29 mayda. Olingan 5 noyabr 2007.
  116. ^ Qarang Ktulxuning chaqirig'i va boshqa g'alati hikoyalar, Penguen klassikalari (1999) p. 390.
  117. ^ a b Yunte, Xuang. Charli Chan: Hurmatli detektiv va uning Amerika tarixi bilan qayta tiklanishi haqida aytilmagan hikoya, Nyu-York: W.W. Norton, 2010. p. 144.
  118. ^ a b Stoneman, Rod (2014 yil 8-noyabr). "Uzoq Sharqdagi Fu jangi: Sariq xavf - doktor Fu Manchu va xinofobiyaning ko'tarilishi". Irish Times. Arxivlandi asl nusxasidan 2015 yil 19 yanvarda. Olingan 4 yanvar 2015.
  119. ^ Frayling, Kristofer. "Fu Manchu", yilda BFI-ning dahshatga yo'ldoshi. London, Kassel, 1996, 131-32 betlar. ISBN  0-304-33216-X
  120. ^ Piter X. Feng, Osiyolik amerikaliklarni skrining qilish, Rutgers universiteti matbuoti, 2002, p. 59.
  121. ^ DeFalco, Tom; Gilbert, Laura (2008). "1960-yillar". Marvel Chronicle: Yildan-yilga tarix. Dorling Kindersli. p. 99. ISBN  978-0756641238. Sax Rohmerning Fu-manchjusi va Atlasning o'zining Sariq tirnoqlari an'analariga rioya qilgan holda, Mandarin birinchi bo'lib paydo bo'ldi Shubhasizlik haqidagi ertaklar # 50 Sten Li tomonidan yozilgan va Don Xek tomonidan tasvirlangan hikoyada.
  122. ^ Qora, Sheyn; Pearce, Drew (2013). "Audio sharh uchun Temir odam 3". Temir odam 3 (Blu ray). Uolt Disneyda uy sharoitida o'yin-kulgi.
  123. ^ Qonundan tashqari, Kofi. "Shang-Chi Kasting MCU-da asosiy Mandarin kelib chiqishi retkonini tasdiqlashi mumkin". ComicBook.com. Arxivlandi asl nusxasidan 2019 yil 6-avgustda. Olingan 6 avgust 2019.

Nashrlar

  • Sariq xavf, Britaniya romanlari to'plami 1895–1913, 7 jildda, Yorimitsu Xashimoto tomonidan tahrirlangan, Tokio: Edition Synapse. ISBN  978-4-86166-031-3
  • Sariq xavf, tarixiy manbalar to'plami, 5 jildda, Yorimitsu Xashimoto tomonidan tahrirlangan, Tokio: Edition Synapse. ISBN  978-4-86166-033-7
  • Baron Suematsu Evropada rus-yapon urushi paytida (1904-05): uning sariq xavf bilan urushi, Matsumura Masayoshi tomonidan, Yan Ruxton tomonidan tarjima qilingan (lulu.com, 2011)
  • Dikkinson, Edvard Ross (2002). "Jinsiy aloqa, erkalik va" sariq xavf ": Christian von Erenfelsning" Evropa jinsiy tartibini qayta ko'rib chiqish dasturi, 1902-1910 ". Germaniya tadqiqoti. 25 (2): 255–284. doi:10.2307/1432992. JSTOR  1432992. PMID  20373550.
  • Palmer, Jeyms Qonli oq baron: Mo'g'ulistonning oxirgi xoni bo'lgan rus zodagonining g'ayrioddiy hikoyasi, Nyu-York: Asosiy kitoblar, 2009, ISBN  0465022073.
  • Sariq xavf !: Osiyo qarshi qo'rquv arxivi, Jon Kuo Vey Tchen va Dilan Yits tahrir qilgan. ISBN  978-1781681237

Tashqi havolalar