Yordam samaradorligi - Aid effectiveness

Yordam samaradorligi va ta'siri

Yordam samaradorligi samaradorligi rivojlanish uchun yordam erishishda iqtisodiy yoki inson rivojlanishi (yoki rivojlanish maqsadlari). 1990-yillarning oxiridagi Sovuq urushdan keyin donor hukumatlar va yordam agentliklari ularning konditsionerlik yordamiga bo'lgan turli xil yondashuvlari va talablari rivojlanayotgan mamlakatlarga katta xarajatlarni keltirib chiqarayotganini va yordamning samarasizligini tushunib etdilar. Ular bir-biri bilan va rivojlanayotgan mamlakatlar bilan ishlashni samaradorligini oshirish uchun o'z ishlarini uyg'unlashtirish uchun ishlashni boshladilar. Yordam agentliklari doimo yordam samaradorligini oshirishning yangi usullarini izlaydilar, shu jumladan shartlilik, salohiyatni oshirish va takomillashtirishni qo'llab-quvvatlash boshqaruv.[1]

Tarixiy ma'lumot

Sovuq urush davri

Xalqaro yordam tizimi Qo'shma Shtatlar o'z mablag'larini Evropani tiklashga yordam berish uchun ishlatgan Ikkinchi Jahon urushi xarobalari natijasida vujudga keldi. Tizim Sovuq urush davrida 1960-dan 1980-yillarga qadar yoshga kirgan. Shu vaqt ichida chet el yordami ko'pincha rivojlanayotgan dunyodagi mijoz-davlatlarni qo'llab-quvvatlash uchun ishlatilgan. Hatto mablag'lar yaxshi boshqariladigan mamlakatlarda yaxshiroq ishlatilgan bo'lsa ham, ular o'rniga ittifoqchilarga yo'naltirildi.

Keng tarqalgan ochlik Biafra davomida Nigeriya fuqarolar urushi (1967-1970) katta narsalarga olib keldi NNT kabi tadbirlarda ishtirok etish Biafran aviakompaniyasi birinchi marta urinib ko'rilmoqda.[2] Davomida yordam ajratish usuli 1983-1985 yillarda Efiopiyada ochlik hukumat va nodavlat notijorat tashkilotlarining ziddiyatli vaziyatlarda yuz beradigan xalqaro favqulodda vaziyatlarga javob berish uslubini abadiy o'zgartirib yubordi va gumanitar tashkilotlar va qabul qiluvchi hukumatlar o'rtasidagi munosabatlar to'g'risida bezovta qiluvchi savollarni tug'dirdi.[3] 1980 va 1990 yillarda nodavlat notijorat tashkilotlari xalqaro yordam ko'rsatishda ko'proq ishtirok etishdi.[4]

Sovuq urushdan keyin

Sovuq urush tugagandan so'ng, rasmiy yordamning e'lon qilingan yo'nalishi qashshoqlikni engillashtirish va taraqqiyotni qo'llab-quvvatlashga yo'naltirilgan. Eng muhtoj va qashshoqlikka muhtoj bo'lgan mamlakatlar ustuvor vazifaga aylandi. Sovuq urush tugagandan so'ng, G'arb donorlari yordamni shartli ravishda kuchaytirishga muvaffaq bo'lishdi, chunki ular endi oluvchi mamlakatlarda geosiyosiy manfaatlarga ega emas edilar. Bu donorlarga yordam oluvchilarning hukumatlari iqtisodiy va demokratik o'zgarishlarni amalga oshirishi sharti bilan yordamni shartlashlariga imkon berdi.[5] Aynan shu fonda xalqaro yordam samaradorligi harakati 1990 yillarning oxirlarida donorlik hukumatlari va yordam agentliklari birgalikda samaradorlikni oshirish uchun ish boshlaganligi sababli shakllana boshladi.

Harakatdagi taraqqiyot

Yordam samaradorligi harakati 2002 yilda Rivojlanishni moliyalashtirish bo'yicha xalqaro konferentsiyada muvaffaqiyatga erishdi[6] tashkil etgan Meksikaning Monterrey shahrida Monterrey konsensusi. U erda xalqaro hamjamiyat rivojlanish uchun mablag'larni ko'paytirishga kelishib oldi, ammo ko'proq pulning o'zi etarli emasligini tan oldi. Donorlar va rivojlanayotgan mamlakatlar ham yordamdan iloji boricha samarali foydalanilishini bilishni istashdi. Ular kambag'al mamlakatlarga Mingyillik Rivojlanish Maqsadlariga erishishda yordam berishda eng maqbul rol o'ynashini xohlashdi,[7] 2000 yilda 192 mamlakat tomonidan kelishilgan va 2015 yilda dunyo qashshoqligini ikki baravar kamaytirishga qaratilgan maqsadlar to'plami. Donor va oluvchi o'rtasidagi bir tomonlama munosabatlar o'rniga, sheriklik sifatida yordamning yangi paradigmasi rivojlanib bormoqda.

2003 yilda yordam bo'yicha rasmiylar va donor va yordam oluvchi mamlakatlar vakillari Rimdagi Uyg'unlashtirish bo'yicha yuqori darajadagi forumga yig'ildilar.[8] Iqtisodiy hamkorlik va taraqqiyot tashkiloti tomonidan chaqirilgan ushbu yig'ilishda[9] (OECD), donorlik tashkilotlari rivojlanayotgan mamlakatlar bilan o'z faoliyatini mamlakat darajasida yaxshiroq muvofiqlashtirish va soddalashtirish uchun ishlashga sodiqdirlar. Ular 2005 yil boshida Parijda yana uchrashishdan oldin aniq taraqqiyotni baholashga kelishib oldilar. Parijda dunyoning turli mamlakatlaridan Yordam samaradorligi to'g'risida Parij deklaratsiyasi, sheriklik tamoyillariga asoslanib, donor va rivojlanayotgan mamlakatlar birgalikda biznes yuritish usulini o'zgartirishga qaratilgan keng qamrovli urinish. Uch yil o'tgach, 2008 yilda Uchinchi yuqori darajadagi forum[10] Akkrada Gana taraqqiyotni hisobga oldi va o'zgarish tezligini tezlashtirish uchun Parij deklaratsiyasiga asoslandi. Deklaratsiyalarda kelishilgan printsiplar, ammo har doim ham donorlar va ko'p tomonlama tashkilotlar tomonidan qo'llanilmaydi. Kambodja masalasida ikki mutaxassis donorlarning noto'g'ri xatti-harakatlarini baholadi.[11]

Yordam samaradorligi bo'yicha yuqori darajadagi forumlar

Ushbu uchrashuvlarning natijalari va tafsilotlari turli xillardan yordamning samaradorligini ko'rsatish uchun hujjatlashtirildi Yordam samaradorligi bo'yicha yuqori darajadagi forumlar.

Yaxshilash va tanqidlar

Yordam samaradorligini oshirishga qaratilgan sa'y-harakatlar sog'liqni saqlash sohasida katta sur'atlarga ega bo'ldi Xalqaro sog'liqni saqlash bo'yicha hamkorlik (IHP +). IHP + 2007 yilda yaratilgan[12] rivojlanayotgan mamlakatlarda fuqarolarning sog'lig'ini yaxshilashga sodiq bo'lgan sheriklar guruhidir. Ushbu sheriklar yordam samaradorligi va rivojlanish bo'yicha hamkorlikning xalqaro printsiplarini amalda qo'llash uchun birgalikda harakat qilishadi. IHP + milliy hukumatlarni, rivojlanish agentliklarini, fuqarolik jamiyatini va boshqalarni yaxshi muvofiqlashtirilgan holda yagona, mamlakat boshchiligidagi milliy strategiyani qo'llab-quvvatlashga safarbar etadi.

Yordamni oshirish bo'yicha global kampaniyalar, ayniqsa 2000 yildan boshlab avj olgani sababli, yordamning ta'sirini tanqid qilish yanada keskinlashdi. Yordam hech qachon samarali bo'lmaydi, degan fikrlar mavjud. Aksariyat yordam amaliyotchilarining fikriga ko'ra, yordam har doim ham maksimal darajada ishlamagan, ammo u to'g'ri yo'naltirilganda va boshqarilganda, ayniqsa sog'liqni saqlash va boshlang'ich ta'lim kabi sohalarda muhim natijalarga erishgan. Yordam kambag'al davlatlarning rivojlanishi uchun zarur bo'lgan murakkab jarayonning yagona omili ekanligi va iqtisodiy o'sish va samarali boshqaruvning zarur sharti ekanligi to'g'risida keng kelishuvlarga erishilgan. Yordamni samarali va eng maqbul darajada oshirish uchun xayriya mablag'lari rivojlanayotgan mamlakatlardagi mahalliy sanoat, franchayzing yoki foyda markazlari kabi yo'nalishlarga yo'naltirilishi kerak. Shunday qilib, ushbu harakatlar sog'liqni saqlash bilan bog'liq xarajatlarni saqlab qolishi va uzoq muddatda o'sishiga olib kelishi mumkin.[13]

Iqtisodiy hamkorlik va taraqqiyot tashkiloti (OECD) ekspertlarning baholashlari va Rivojlanishga ko'maklashish qo'mitasi (DAC) tomonidan amalga oshirilgan boshqa ishlar orqali - yordamning nima uchun bo'lgan va ishlamaganligi sabablarini o'rganib chiqdi. Buning natijasida global miqyosda yordamni yaxshiroq ishlashini ta'minlash uchun qo'llanilishi mumkin bo'lgan eng yaxshi amaliyot va printsiplar to'plami paydo bo'ldi. Bugungi kunda yordam samaradorligini oshirish harakatlarining asosiy maqsadi rivojlanayotgan mamlakatlarga yaxshi rivojlangan mahalliy tuzilmalar va tizimlarni yaratishda yordam berish, ular o'zlarining rivojlanishlarini boshqarish va yordamga bog'liqlikni kamaytirishlari mumkin.

Samaradorlikka ehtiyoj

Tomonidan tan olingan OECD Yordam samaradorligini oshirish bo'yicha ishchi guruhi, 21-asrning boshlarida keng va barqaror rivojlanishga ko'maklashish nafaqat ko'rsatilgan yordam miqdori, balki Qanaqasiga yordam berildi.[14]

So'nggi o'n yil ichida yordam oqimlari sezilarli darajada oshdi, biroq ayni paytda yordam tobora parchalanib ketdi. Donorlar sonida portlash yuz berdi va loyihalar soni ko'paygan bo'lsa-da, ularning o'rtacha hajmi kamaydi. Kichik loyihalar hajmi, ko'lami va davomiyligi bo'yicha ko'pincha cheklangan bo'lib, darhol ta'sir etmasdan uzoq muddatli foyda keltiradi.[15] Ko'proq o'yinchilar bilan yordam kamroq prognozli, kamroq shaffof va o'zgaruvchan bo'lib qoldi.[16]

Donorlar va oluvchilar darajasidagi ma'lumotlar ko'pincha yomon, to'liq emas va boshqa ma'lumotlar bilan taqqoslash qiyin, shuningdek, benefitsiarlarning fikrlari va loyihani rasmiy baholashlari kamdan-kam uchraydi. Hamkor davlatlar yordamning miqdori va muddati haqida ishonch hosil qilishlari mumkin bo'lgan hollarda yordamni oldindan aytish mumkin. Bashoratli bo'lmaslikning xarajati bor: The o'lik vazn yo'qotish o'zgaruvchanlik bilan bog'liq bo'lib, so'nggi yillarda rivojlanayotgan mamlakatlarning Evropa Ittifoqi tomonidan dasturlashtiriladigan yordamining o'rtacha 10% dan 20% gacha bo'lgan.[17]

So'nggi o'n yil ichida yordam atrof-muhit keskin o'zgardi. Rivojlanayotgan iqtisodiyotlar (Xitoy, Hindiston, Saudiya Arabistoni, Koreya[tushuntirish kerak ], Hali ham G'arb mamlakatlaridan yordam olayotgan Turkiya, Braziliya, Venesuela va boshqalar) o'zlari donor bo'lib qolishdi. Ko'p millatli korporatsiyalar, xayriyachilar, xalqaro nodavlat tashkilotlar va fuqarolik jamiyati ham asosiy ishtirokchilarga aylandi. Rivojlanish bo'yicha yangi sheriklarning paydo bo'lishi rivojlanish jamiyatiga turli xil moliyalashtirish, nou-xau va ko'nikmalar olib kelishiga ijobiy ta'sir ko'rsatgan bo'lsa-da, ayni paytda mavjud yordam tizimini chayqadi. Bu, ayniqsa, rivojlanayotgan iqtisodiyotlar misolida to'g'ri keladi, chunki ular an'anaviy donorlar me'yorlariga mos kelmasliklarini sezmaydilar.[18] Odatda talabchan shartlilik yordam evaziga, bu tovar va xizmatlarni sotib olishga yordamni bog'lashni anglatadi, ular rivojlanish uchun an'anaviy yordam standartlarini qiyinlashtirmoqdalar.[19]

Yordamni boshqarish o'zini murakkab, byurokratik va bo'lakli sifatida namoyish etadi, bu raqamlar va koordinatsiyaning aniq nomuvofiqligi bilan bog'liq bo'lib, ular tranzaktsion xarajatlarning oshishiga olib keldi. Bu donorlarning talablari va uchrashuvlari bilan shug'ullanish bo'yicha o'zlarining ichki majburiyatlarini e'tiborsiz qoldirishga majbur bo'lgan pul oluvchi mamlakatlar uchun amal qiladi[20] (mamlakat miqyosidagi imkoniyatlarning etishmasligi va donorlarning talablariga javob berish ustuvorligini hisobga olgan holda), shuningdek donorlar va, pirovardida, benefitsiarlar uchun. Darhaqiqat, har bir loyihada loyihalashtirish, muzokara o'tkazish va amalga oshirish uchun doimiy xarajatlar mavjud bo'lib, ular yakuniy foyda oluvchilar uchun mavjud bo'lgan dollarlarni kamaytiradi.

Xalqaro hamjamiyat samaradorlik masalasini Parij deklaratsiyasi va keyingi Akkra harakat dasturi orqali hal qilganiga qaramay, ushbu kun tartibini amalga oshirish qiyin kechmoqda. Hukumatlar va yordam agentliklari rahbariyat darajasida majburiyatlarni qabul qildilar, ammo hozircha yuqoridan pastga, umumiy maqsadlarga erishishdan boshqa hech narsa qilmadi. Rivojlanishning o'nlab yillari shuni ko'rsatdiki, agar mamlakatlar yordamga bog'liqlikni kamaytirmoqchi bo'lsalar, ular o'zlarining ustuvor yo'nalishlarini belgilab olishlari va ushbu yordamni etkazib berish uchun o'z tizimlariga tayanib, pastdan yuqoriga qarab yondashishlari kerak.[21] Yordamni yanada samarali boshqarish mumkinligi to'g'risida keng kelishuv mavjud,[22] dastur sifati va hisobdorligi to'g'risida qo'ng'iroqqa javob berish.[23]

So'nggi yarim asrda tashqi yordamga 2,32 trillion dollardan ko'proq mablag 'sarflangani va qashshoqlik va mojaroni kamaytirishga teng keladigan ta'siri bo'lmagan holda,[24] va yaqinda Afrika shoxidagi ochlik kabi yangi inqiroz,[25] bu qo'ng'iroq ayniqsa umidsiz bo'lib qoladi. 2011 yil 21 sentyabrda nashr etilgan OECD -Rivojlanishiga ko'maklashish qo'mitasi "Yordam samaradorligi 2005-2010: Parij deklaratsiyasini amalga oshirishda taraqqiyot" hisoboti 2010 yil uchun belgilangan 13 ta maqsaddan faqat bittasi bajarilganligini aniq ko'rsatmoqda.

Yordam samaradorligi bo'yicha 4-darajali yuqori darajadagi forum (HLF) Pusan, Janubiy Koreya, 2011 yil 29 noyabrdan 1 dekabrigacha bo'lgan davrda xalqaro rivojlanish sohasidagi hamkorlik chorrahasida bo'lgan.[26] HLF-4 hech bo'lmaganda shu davrgacha bo'lajak yordamning sifat doirasi bo'yicha tavsiyalar berishi kutilgan edi MRM 2015 yil.[22] Xususan, HLF-4 yaratilishini ta'minladi Samarali rivojlanish bo'yicha global hamkorlik.

OECD yordam samaradorligi bo'yicha ishi (2003 yildan hozirgi kungacha)

The Iqtisodiy hamkorlik va taraqqiyot tashkiloti[27] yordamni samarali taqsimlash bo'yicha xalqaro hamjamiyatning sa'y-harakatlarini muvofiqlashtirishning asosiy funktsiyasiga ega Rivojlanishiga ko'maklashish qo'mitasi yoki DAC.[28] Ushbu qo'mita qoshida turli xil sohalarda yordam samaradorligini oshirish uchun donorlarning sa'y-harakatlarini engillashtiradigan Yordam samaradorligi bo'yicha Ishchi guruh mavjud.[29][30] Yirik xalqaro forum rivojlanayotgan mamlakatlarga ko'p tomonlama va ikki tomonlama donorlar bilan hamkorlik qilish imkoniyatini beradi. WP-EFF Mingyillik rivojlanish maqsadlariga yo'naltirilgan tashabbuslarni ilgari surishda muhim rol o'ynadi. Shuningdek, 2008 yil sentyabr oyida Akkrada yordam samaradorligi bo'yicha uchinchi yuqori darajadagi forum tashkil etildi.[31]

Yordam samaradorligini oshirish bo'yicha ishchi guruhga 2005 yilgi Parij deklaratsiyasining majburiyatlarini bajarish bo'yicha taraqqiyotni o'lchash va rag'batlantirish vazifasi topshirildi[32] va siyosat va yaxshi amaliyot bo'yicha ko'rsatmalar berdi. Ishchi guruh tarkibiga 23 ta DAC a'zo davlatlari, 23 ta rivojlanayotgan mamlakatlar va 11 ko'p tomonlama tashkilotlarning katta siyosiy maslahatchilari kiradi. Ikki tomonlama donorlik tashkiloti, ko'p tomonlama tashkilot va rivojlanayotgan mamlakat sheriklarini o'z ichiga olgan noyob "uch tomonlama" raislik tartibi mavjud. Bu Parij deklaratsiyasida aks ettirilgan sheriklik majburiyatlarini aks ettiradi.[33] WP-EFF, shuningdek, fuqarolik jamiyati tashkilotlari bilan faol muvofiqlashadi. Keng vakolatni samarali ravishda qoplash uchun u Parij deklaratsiyasini monitoring qilish, davlat moliyaviy boshqaruvini, xaridlarini va rivojlanish natijalarini boshqarishni o'z ichiga olgan qiziqish doiralarini o'rganish uchun bir qator qo'shma korxonalar tashkil etdi.

DAC global miqyosdagi yordamga oid noyob va aniq statistik ma'lumotlarni yuritadi va taqdim etadi. Uning statistika bo'yicha ishchi guruhi[34] vaqt o'tishi bilan rivojlanish bo'yicha rasmiy yordamni kuzatib boradi, bu yordam tendentsiyalari bo'yicha tahliliy ishlar va yordam samaradorligini baholash uchun mustahkam asos yaratadi. An'anaviy OECD yordam donorlaridan tashqari, ma'lumotlar yig'ish rivojlanayotgan mamlakatlarga boshqa rasmiy va xususiy oqimlarni ham o'z ichiga oladi.

Rivojlanishiga ko'maklashish qo'mitasining tarmoqlari

Yordam samaradorligini oshirish bo'yicha boshqa ishlarni DAC tarmoqlari amalga oshirmoqda - bu mutaxassislarni birlashtirgan global yo'nalish.

Rivojlanishni baholash tarmog'i[35] yordam faoliyatini mustahkam, xabardor va mustaqil baholashni qo'llab-quvvatlaydi. Ushbu Tarmoq Parij deklaratsiyasini amalga oshirishni baholash kabi yordam samaradorligini birgalikda ko'rib chiqishga yordam beradi. Shuningdek, u baholashda foydalaniladigan standartlar va me'yorlarni takomillashtirish bo'yicha ishlaydi. 30 baholash tarmog'ining a'zolari DACga a'zo barcha mamlakatlar va Afrika Taraqqiyot Banki (AfDB), Osiyo Taraqqiyot Banki (OTB), Evropa tiklanish va taraqqiyot banki (EBRD) va Jahon banki tomonidan baholash rahbarlarini o'z ichiga oladi.

DACning gender tengligi bo'yicha tarmog'i,[36] GENDERNET, integratsiyalashishga yordam beradigan amaliy vositalarni ishlab chiqaradi jinsiy tenglik va ayollarning rivojlanish sohasidagi hamkorlikning barcha jabhalarida imkoniyatlarini kengaytirish. Ayni paytda u Parij deklaratsiyasini amalga oshirishga qaratilgan bo'lib, ayollarning imkoniyatlarini kengaytirish, ularning ta'sirini oshirish uchun yordam samaradorligi harakatlariga qanday qilib aniq birlashtirilishi mumkinligini ko'rsatadigan bir qator etakchi printsiplarni ishlab chiqmoqda.

Atrof muhit va taraqqiyot bo'yicha hamkorlik tarmog'i,[37] ENVIRONET, Parij deklaratsiyasi va Akkra harakat dasturi tomonidan chaqirilganidek, atrof-muhit va iqlim o'zgarishini rivojlanish sohasidagi hamkorlikning barcha jabhalariga integratsiyalashuviga yordam beradi. O'rganilgan saboqlar va eng yaxshi amaliyotlarga asoslanib, Tarmoq Mingyillik rivojlanish maqsadlari yo'nalishi bo'yicha yanada jadal rivojlanishga erishish uchun siyosat koordinatsiyasini va izchilligini oshirish va "yashil o'sish" tomon muvaffaqiyatli siljish yaratish ustida ish olib boradi.

DACning qashshoqlikni kamaytirish bo'yicha tarmog'i,[38] POVNET, qashshoqlikni kamaytirish uchun iqtisodiy o'sishni rag'batlantiradi va o'sish sur'ati va uslubining muhimligini ta'kidlaydi va o'sishni keng va inklyuziv bo'lishini ta'minlashga harakat qiladi. Ushbu tarmoq tomonidan o'tkaziladigan seminarlarning mavzulariga Parij deklaratsiyasi tamoyillarini qishloq xo'jaligi va infratuzilma sohasida qo'llash kiradi.

Boshqaruv va salohiyatni rivojlantirish bo'yicha tarmoq,[39] GOVNET, donorlarga demokratik boshqaruvni qo'llab-quvvatlashda samaraliroq bo'lishiga yordam beradi. Tajriba va saboqlar almashish, ilg'or tajribani aniqlash va tarqatish, siyosiy va tahliliy vositalarni ishlab chiqish uchun forum taklif etadi. U korruptsiyaga qarshi kurash, institutlarni qurish va inson huquqlarini ta'minlash kabi mavzularda muhim nashrlarni yordamning samaradorligi markaziga qo'ydi.

Mojaro va mo'rtlik holatlari tarmog'i[40] boshqaruv va nizolarning oldini olish bo'yicha ekspertlarni ikki tomonlama va ko'p tomonlama hamkorlik bo'yicha agentliklardan, shu jumladan EC, BMT tizimi, XVF, Jahon banki va mintaqaviy banklardan yig'adi. Mingyillik rivojlanish maqsadlariga zo'ravon to'qnashuvlar, odamlarning ishonchsizligi, zaifligi, zaif boshqaruv va beqarorlik tahdidlari ta'sir qiladigan vaziyatlarda rivojlanish sohasidagi hamkorlik va izchil xalqaro harakatlarni yaxshilashga yordam beradi.

DAC, shuningdek, yordam samaradorligining yangi muammolari bo'yicha ishlaydi. 2008 yilda u har yili o'tkazilgan yangi tadqiqotlarning birinchisini nashr etdi, bu yordam samaradorligini oshirishga to'sqinlik qiluvchi ikkita asosiy axborot bo'shliqlariga qarshi kurashish: donorlarning kelajakdagi xarajatlari va yordam donorlarining ko'payishi. Ushbu so'rovnomalar natijalari donorlarga yordamni qaerga yo'naltirish kerakligi to'g'risida aniqroq qaror qabul qilishga va mamlakat miqyosida yordamni bashorat qilishni yaxshilashga yordam beradi. Tarixiy ma'lumotlarning yangi tahlili, shuningdek, mamlakat ichida donorlarning parchalanishi borligini ko'rsatmoqda, bu esa donorlarni o'zaro yaxshi mehnat taqsimotini izlashga undaydi.

DAC taraqqiyot jamoatchiligi o'rtasida savdo rivojlanishning muhim vositasi ekanligi to'g'risida tan olish uchun ish olib bormoqda. Uning maqsadi - "savdo-sotiq uchun yordam" tadbirlarini qo'llab-quvvatlashni kuchaytirish - kambag'al mamlakatlarning muvaffaqiyatli savdo qilish imkoniyatlarini yaratishga yordam beradigan yordam. DAC va OECD Savdo qo'mitasi mutaxassislari savdoning rivojlanishga ta'siri dalillarini tarqatmoqdalar va savdo uchun yordam dasturlarini ishlab chiqish va amalga oshirishni takomillashtirish uchun analitik vositalarni yaratmoqdalar. Bunga Parij deklaratsiyasi tamoyillarini savdo bilan bog'liq yordam faoliyatiga tatbiq etishni kuchaytirish kiradi.

Yordam samaradorligi bo'yicha xulosalar va tanqidlar

Shuningdek qarang: Yordam § Tanqid

Tabiiy ofatlarga yordam ko'rsatishni tashkil etish

Yordam qanday etkazilishi yordamning sifati va miqdoriga ta'sir qilishi mumkin. Ko'pincha ofat holatlarida xalqaro yordam agentliklari mahalliy idoralar bilan hamkorlikda ishlaydi. Ushbu agentliklarning roli bo'yicha turli xil kelishuvlar bo'lishi mumkin va bunday kelishuv etkazib beriladigan qattiq va yumshoq yordam sifatiga ta'sir qiladi.[41]

Mikro-makro paradoks

Pol Mozli va boshqalarning asosiy xulosalari shuni xulosa qiladiki, rivojlanayotgan mamlakatlarda Yalpi ichki mahsulotning yordami va o'sish sur'atlari o'rtasida biron bir muhim bog'liqlik o'rnatish mumkin emas. Buning bir sababi qo'zg'aluvchanlik va yordamning davlat sektoridagi samarasiz xarajatlarga oqib chiqishi.[42]

Shu bilan birga, mikro darajada barcha donor agentliklar muntazam ravishda aksariyat loyihalar va dasturlarning muvaffaqiyati to'g'risida hisobot berishadi. Ushbu kontrast mikro-makro paradoks sifatida tanilgan.

Mozlining natijasini Piter Boon yana tasdiqladi, chunki u yordam samarasiz, chunki u sarmoyalarni emas, balki iste'molni moliyalashtirishga intiladi. Boone shuningdek, mikro-makro paradoksini tasdiqladi.

Yordam samaradorligini baholashda muammolardan biri shundaki, barcha yordamlar iqtisodiy o'sishni ta'minlash uchun mo'ljallanmagan. Ba'zi yordam insonparvarlik maqsadlariga mo'ljallangan; ba'zilari rivojlanayotgan mamlakatlarda odamlar turmush darajasini yaxshilashi mumkin.[43]

Mikro-makro paradoks, shuningdek, baholash amaliyotining etarli emasligi bilan bog'liq. Masalan, an'anaviy baholash texnikasi ko'pincha ijtimoiy ta'sirlarni hisobga olmagan holda, kirish va chiqishlarni ortiqcha ta'kidlaydi. Keng tarqalgan baholash amaliyotining kamchiliklari ta'sirni baholashning yanada qat'iy usullariga bosqichma-bosqich xalqaro tendentsiyani keltirib chiqardi.[44]

O'lik yordam

Zambiyalik iqtisodchi Dambisa Moyo rivojlanish yordamining ashaddiy raqibi bo'lgan va uni "zamonaviy rivojlanish siyosatining eng yomon qarori" deb atagan. Uning kitobi, O'lik yordam yordam qanday qilib kleptrasiyalarni, korrupsiyani, yordamga bog'liqlikni va bir qator zararli iqtisodiy ta'sirlarni va Afrikadagi rivojlanishning shafqatsiz pasayishini rag'batlantirganligini tasvirlaydi. Uning ta'kidlashicha, tashqi yordam hukumatlar uchun haddan tashqari shakllarni rag'batlantirishga yordam beradi ijara haqi va daromadning ijobiy zarbasini ta'minlash orqali Gollandiyalik kasallik. Bundan tashqari, ushbu oson pul hukumatlar bilan ular va ularning saylovchilari o'rtasida tuzilgan shartnomadan chiqish imkoniyatini beradi: ular soliq evaziga jamoat mollarini etkazib berishlari kerakligi to'g'risidagi shartnomada. Qisqacha aytganda, "davlat o'z xalqi oldidagi mas'uliyatidan voz kechishiga imkon beradi".[45] Shuni ta'kidlash kerakki, Moyo hukumatning ikki tomonlama va ko'p qirrali yordamlarini emas, balki xayriya, gumanitar va favqulodda yordamlarni emas, balki uning retseptlarida Xitoyning Afrikadagi rivojlanib borayotgan rolini ta'kidlab, savdo va to'g'ridan-to'g'ri xorijiy investitsiyalarni oshirishni talab qiladi.[46] Moyo, shuningdek, Grameen Bankning keng miqyosli muvaffaqiyati bilan mashhur bo'lgan mikro-moliyalashtirish sxemalari uchun qit'adagi tadbirkorlikni er darajasida boshlashi uchun, yuqoridan pastga yondashuv yordamidan farqli o'laroq, pastdan yuqoriga qarab qurilish olib boradi.

Burnside and Dollar tadqiqotlari (2000)

Burnside va Dollar "sog'lom" institutlari va iqtisodiy siyosati (ya'ni ochiq savdo, fiskal va pul intizomi) rivojlanayotgan mamlakatlarda yordamning YaIM o'sishiga ijobiy va muhim ta'sir ko'rsatayotganligini ampirik dalillar bilan ta'minlaydi; ammo yordam "kambag'al" institutlari va siyosati bo'lgan mamlakatlarda sezilarli darajada kam ta'sir ko'rsatmoqda. Jahon bankining iqtisodchilari sifatida Burnside va Dollar yordam ajratishda tanlab olish tarafdori edilar. Ularning fikriga ko'ra, yordam muntazam ravishda "yaxshi" siyosat bilan bog'liq bo'lgan mamlakatlarga taqsimlanishi kerak.[47]

Burnside va Dollar topilmalari nashr etilganidan buyon jiddiy tekshiruvdan o'tkazildi. Easterly va boshqalar Burnside va Dollar smetasini yangilangan va kengaytirilgan ma'lumotlar to'plami bilan qayta ko'rib chiqdilar, ammo yordam siyosati bo'yicha o'zaro ta'sir o'tkazish muddatini topa olmadilar. Yangi dalillar Burnside va Dollar natijalari statistik jihatdan mustahkam emasligini ko'rsatmoqda.[48]

Hisobdor boshqaruvning yo'qligiga yordam

Daromadlarni yaratish davlat salohiyatini rivojlantirishning muhim ustunlaridan biridir. Soliqqa tortishning samarali usullari davlatga adolatni ta'minlashdan tortib, ta'lim berishga qadar jamoat mollari va xizmatlarini taqdim etishga imkon beradi.[49] Soliq bir vaqtning o'zida davlat va fuqarolar o'rtasidagi munosabatlarni o'rnatadigan hukumatning hisobdorlik mexanizmi bo'lib xizmat qiladi, chunki fuqarolar endi soliqqa tortishga rozilik berishlari bilan bunday xizmat ko'rsatishni kutishlari mumkin. Bunday daromad qobiliyatiga ega bo'lmagan rivojlanayotgan va zaif davlatlar uchun, yordam zarur ko'rinadigan alternativa bo'lishi mumkin, ammo bu institutsional rivojlanishga putur etkazishi mumkin. Davlat daromadlari bo'yicha yordamning yuqori foizlariga ishongan davlatlar soliqlar o'rnatadigan davlat-fuqaro munosabatlaridan qochib, o'z fuqarolari oldida kamroq javobgar bo'lishadi va davlat institutlarini rivojlantirish uchun kamroq imtiyozlarga duch kelishadi.[50] Subpar institutsional mavjudligi va samaradorligidan kelib chiqadigan hukumatning cheklangan imkoniyatlari quyidagilarga olib keladi: «hamma joyda davlat amaldorlarining korrupsiyasi, qonunlar bilan biznesni tartibga solishda amaldagi amaliyot o'rtasidagi katta bo'shliqlar, hattoki kelmaydigan ishchilar, shifokor bo'lmagan shifokorlar, o'qituvchilar o'rgatmang ”.[51]

Sog'lom institutlar yoki hisobdor boshqaruv bo'lmasa, Natan Nunn va Nensi Tsian AQShning Afrika mamlakatlariga ko'rsatadigan oziq-ovqat yordami va fuqarolar urushi hodisalari o'rtasida ijobiy, sababiy aloqani o'rnatish.[52] Ularning farazlariga ko'ra, oziq-ovqat yordami qo'zg'atuvchidir va hukumat daromadlariga ijobiy zarba bo'lib, nazorat qiluvchi hukumatning daromadlarini oshiradi va shuning uchun oziq-ovqat sifatida fuqarolar urushi ehtimoli osonlikcha pulga aylanishi va ziddiyatlarni moliyalashtirish uchun ishlatilishi mumkin. Mualliflar Sharqiy va Markaziy Afrikadagi qo'zg'olon va mojarolarning kelib chiqishini va ularning oziq-ovqat yordami bilan o'zaro bog'liqligini o'lchab, ikkalasi o'rtasida ijobiy va statistik ahamiyatga ega bo'lgan munosabatlarni ko'rsatdilar.

Yordam samaradorligi bo'yicha tadqiqotlar va adabiyotlar

Yordam bo'yicha olib borilgan tadqiqotlarning bir muammosi shundaki, har xil turdagi yordamlar o'rtasida farq yo'q. Qisqa muddatli yordam kabi ba'zi turdagi yordamlar iqtisodiy o'sishga ta'sir qilmaydi, infratuzilma va investitsiyalar uchun ishlatiladigan boshqa yordamlar ijobiy iqtisodiy o'sishga olib keladi.[53] Qabul qiluvchilarni boshqarish sifati bilan turli xil yordam turlari ham o'z ta'sirida ozmi-ko'pmi shartli ekanligi isbotlangan. Masalan, ikki tomonlama yordam, kreditlar va qishloq xo'jaligi sohasiga ko'mak, oziq-ovqat xavfsizligiga potentsial ijobiy ta'sir ko'rsatishda ko'p tomonlama yordam, grantlar va qishloq xo'jaligidan tashqari boshqa sohalarga yordam berishdan ko'ra ko'proq vositachilik qilganligi aniqlandi.[54]

Yordamni ko'paytirish bo'yicha adabiyotlarda paydo bo'layotgan voqealar shuni ko'rsatadiki, yordam turli xil sharoitlarda samarali bo'ladi va yordam ta'siridagi noaniqliklar yordamning o'sishi munosabatlarining ahamiyatini pasaytiradi. Biroq, yordamga qaytish, yutilish qobiliyati va boshqa cheklovlar tufayli kamayib borayotgan rentabellikni ko'rsatadi. Shuningdek, geografik jihatdan qiyin bo'lgan mamlakatlar yordamga nisbatan past samaradorlikni namoyish etishadi va bu mablag'larni ajratishda hisobga olinishi kerak.

Shu sababli, yordamni taqsimlashdagi muammo, yordamning o'sishga ta'sirini kamaytiradigan eng yuqori darajadagi institutsional va siyosiy cheklovlarni aniqlash va yo'q qilishdir. Shunday qilib, haqiqiy muammo cheklovlarni aniqlashga yordam beradigan "o'sish va rivojlanish" diagnostikasi tizimini ishlab chiqishdir. Stefan Shmitz hisobot vazifalari, natijalarga yo'naltirilgan harakatlar va faoliyatni doimiy ravishda baholash yordam samaradorligi uchun juda zarur, deb hisoblaydi, ammo buning uchun siyosiy iroda mavjud bo'lishi kerak.[55]

Ko'pgina olimlar tashqi yordam rejimni o'zgartirishga olib kelishi mumkinmi yoki muxtoriyatlarni demokratlashtirishmi yoki demokratik davlatlarni avtokratiyaga aylantirish mumkinmi deb bahslashmoqdalar. Ushbu olimlarning ba'zilari, g'arbiy donorlar yordamni talab qilganda, oluvchi mamlakatlar demokratik o'zgarishlarni amalga oshirishi kerak bo'lsa, bu o'zgarishlar iqtisodiy o'sishga olib keladi, deb ta'kidlaydilar. Yakob Svensson buning o'rniga hukumatning tashqi yordami allaqachon demokratik davlat bo'lgan qabul qiluvchi mamlakatlarda iqtisodiy o'sishning samarali manbai bo'lishi mumkinligini aniqladi.[56]

So'nggi 25 yil ichida yordam to'rt baravarga oshdi, aksariyat yordamlar hali ham rasmiy donorlar va yangi paydo bo'lgan gigantlar tomonidan kelmoqda. Xitoy va Hindiston. Bundan tashqari, pullar turli yo'llar bilan sarflanmoqda, masalan, bezgak yoki qizamiqni nazorat qilish kabi muayyan muammolarga qarshi kurashish bo'yicha global dasturlarga. Chet elda rivojlanish instituti ish yordamni quyidagi yo'llar bilan qoplashni talab qiladi:

  • Yordam arxitekturasini qayta qurish va yordam samaradorligini oshirish
  • Davlat moliyasini boshqarishni isloh qilish
  • Sektor va mahalliy darajada resurslarni taqsimlash va ulardan foydalanishni kuchaytirish
  • Milliy siyosat va rejalashtirish jarayonlarini takomillashtirish[57]

Akkra kun tartibi va Parij deklaratsiyasi bo'yicha tadqiqotlar

Chet elda rivojlanish instituti tomonidan Efiopiya, Syerra-Leon va Zambiyadagi yuqori martabali siyosatchilar va hukumat amaldorlari bilan yuzma-yuz suhbatlashish asosida o'tkazilgan tadqiqotlar shuni ko'rsatadiki, Akkra kun tartibi (AAA) va Yordam samaradorligi to'g'risida Parij deklaratsiyasi ko'rsatkichlari juda tor aniqlangan va chuqurlik yo'q.[58] "Bashorat qilish" va "shaffoflik" tamoyillari chuqurlikning yo'qligi va muhim kichik o'lchamlarga etarli darajada ahamiyat berilmaganligi, masalan, mahalliy sharoitlarga moslashishga ta'kidlangan. Suhbat davomida qabul qiluvchilarning hukumatlari "bashorat qilish mumkinligi" ni anglatadi, chunki donorlar rejalashtirilgan choraklar davomida mablag 'ajratishlari kerak, Parij deklaratsiyasi har yili ishlaydi va birinchi va to'rtinchi chorak o'rtasida farq qilmaydi. Shuningdek, va'dalar va haqiqiy majburiyatlar o'rtasidagi farqlar, tasdiqlash jarayonini tezlashtirish zarurligi va yordamga aniq va erishish mumkin bo'lgan shartlarni yaratish zarurligi, kichik shartlarga to'liq erishilmaganda pul mablag'larini ushlab qolishning oldini olish kerakligi ta'kidlandi. Donorlarning qarorlari sabablarining oshkoraligi ham juda muhim deb hisoblandi, nega mablag 'ajratilgandan ko'ra kamroq mablag' ajratilganligi, nega oluvchi hukumatning fikri bortga olinmaganligi va nega mablag'larning ma'lum bir foizida "ochiq" bo'lish zarurligi ko'rib chiqildi. texnik yordam (TA) kabi ba'zi faoliyatlarga mo'ljallangan edi. Ushbu suhbatlar va boshqa tadqiqotlar natijasida olingan xulosa shundan iboratki, donorlarni oluvchilar uchun eng muhim uchta masala quyidagilardan iborat:[59]

  • rivojlanishga sodiqlik chuqurligi
  • mamlakat sharoitlariga javob berish va
  • oluvchiga asoslangan siyosatni qo'llab-quvvatlash

Yordam oluvchilar tomonidan ta'kidlangan ushbu donorlik tashkilotlari ushbu masalalarga alohida e'tibor berishadi Afrika taraqqiyot banki (AfDB) va Jahon banki, undan keyin Birlashgan Millatlar Tashkilotining Taraqqiyot Dasturi (BMTTD) va Osiyo taraqqiyot banki (AsDB).

Yordamdan tashqari

Rivojlanayotgan mamlakatlarni qashshoqlikdan qutqarish uchun faqatgina yordamning o'zi etarli emas degan tadqiqot va adabiyotlar soni ko'paymoqda. Yordam haqiqatan ham o'sishga sezilarli ta'sir ko'rsatadimi yoki yo'qmi, u vakuumda ishlamaydi. Donor mamlakatlarning tobora ko'payib borayotgan siyosati savdo, investitsiya yoki migratsiya kabi rivojlanishni to'ldirishi yoki to'sqinlik qilishi mumkin. The Rivojlanish indeksiga sodiqlik tomonidan har yili nashr etiladi Global Taraqqiyot Markazi donor mamlakatlarning rivojlanayotgan dunyoga nisbatan siyosatini ko'rib chiqish va berilgan yordamni oddiy taqqoslash doirasidan tashqariga chiqish uchun shunday urinishlardan biridir. Bu nafaqat yordamning miqdorini, balki sifatini ham hisobga olib, katta miqdordagi bog'langan yordamni bergan davlatlarni jazolaydi.

Rivojlanish uchun yordam modelini qayta ko'rib chiqish

Yordam berish uchun keng tarqalgan tanqidlar bilan bir qatorda muqobillar uchun ko'plab retseptlar keltiring. Mamlakatlar yordamisiz yoki uni qayta ishlashning keskin qayta ko'rib chiqilgan usullari bilan oldinga siljishning ko'plab usullari mavjud. Afrikalik iqtisodchi, Jeyms Shikvati So'zlari, "Afrika muammosini eng yaxshi Afrika xalqi hal qiladi". "Agar yordam to'xtatilsa, siyosiy elita birinchi qurbonlar bo'ladi"[60] chunki ularning oson pul mablag'lari quriydi. Afrikaning muammolarini hal qilish zarurati keskin ko'tarilib, tadbirkorlik va savdo-sotiqning afzalliklari diqqat markaziga kelib, sog'lom institutlarni barpo etish zarurati ham paydo bo'ladi.

Perulik iqtisodchi, Hernando De Soto, o'z kitobida, Kapital sirlari shuningdek, Afrikada o'zini qashshoqlikdan qutqarish uchun zarur bo'lgan boylik boyligi borligini qat'iyan ta'kidlaydi, shunchaki bu boyliklardan boylik yaratishga imkon beradigan institutlar etishmayapti.[61] Aktivlarning yomon hujjatlari va mulk huquqining etishmasligi odamlar o'z mol-mulklarini garovga qo'yib berolmasligini anglatadi, masalan, agar fermer o'z oilasida avlodlar davomida bo'lgan er uchastkasida yashasa, uning fikriga ko'ra, barcha maqsadlar uchun u egalik qiladi. er. Ammo uning mulk huquqi chegaralarini aniq belgilab qo'ygan erga egalik huquqi guvohnomasi yo'q, demak u kredit olish uchun ushbu erni garovga qo'yolmaydi. Ushbu sodda misol nima uchun sarmoyani (va shuning uchun o'sishni) to'xtatib qo'yishini, ishbilarmonlik ruhi mavjud bo'lishi mumkinligini, ammo u bilan shug'ullanish uchun vositalarning yo'qligini tushuntirishga yordam beradi. Shuning uchun javob oddiy ko'rinadi: aktivlarning shaffof hujjatlarini taqdim etadigan va ularni osonlik bilan likvidga o'tkazishga imkon beradigan bunday muassasalarni yaratish. Amalda esa, bu unchalik oddiy bo'lmasligi mumkin va davlatning byurokratik tuzumida kapital ta'mirlashni o'z ichiga oladi. Qanday qilib yordam yaxshiroq institutlarni tarbiyalashga yordam berishi mumkin, bu asosiy savolga aylanadi.

Pol Kollier, ichida Pastki milliard, u "Mustaqil xizmat organlari" deb nomlagan modelni taklif qiladi. Bular hukumatdan mustaqil bo'lgan, yordam va davlat pullarini boshqarish uchun fuqarolik jamiyatini qo'llab-quvvatlaydigan va ushbu mablag 'sarfidan qanday qilib mahsulot ishlab chiqarishni ko'paytirishni aniqlash uchun jamoatchilik fikri va nodavlat tashkilotlarning tekshiruvini o'z ichiga olgan tashkilotlardir.[62]

Uilyam Pasxa voqeani aytib beradi Oq odamning yuki, u erda har yili bezgak bilan kasallangan uch millionga yaqin odamga yordam berish, Afrikaga to'r yuborish kabi oddiy bo'lmasligi mumkin. Ko'pincha, bu to'rlar qora bozorga yo'naltiriladi va ko'proq tadbirkorlik bilan shug'ullanadi, masalan, ulardan baliq ovlash tarmoqlarini yasash uchun. Pasxa hisobotini davom ettiradi, ammo bozorda chivinli to'rlarni arzon narxlarda sotib olish sxemalari joriy etilganda, ulardan foydalanish keskin oshadi.[63] U dunyodagi kambag'allarga yordam berish uchun mahalliylashtirilgan, moslashtirilgan sxemalardan foydalanishni yoqlaydi va qashshoqlik uchun to'liq davo deb da'vo qiladigan keng ko'lamli sxemalarni arzonlashtiradi.

Dambisa Moyo o'z kitobining butun qismini, O'lik yordam yordamga bog'liqlik modelini qayta ko'rib chiqish. She cautions that although “weaning governments off aid won’t be easy”,[64] it is necessary. Primary among her prescriptions is a “capital solution” where African countries must enter the bond market to raise their capital for development, the interconnectedness that globalization has provided, will turn other “pools of money toward African markets in form of mutual funds, hedge funds, pension schemes” etc.[65]

Although a bleak picture is painted of aid, with it comes room for new solutions and new ways of thinking about development

Bog'langan yordam

Bog'langan yordam is defined as project aid contracted by source to private firms in the donor country. It refers to aid tied to goods and services supplied exclusively by donor country businesses or agencies. Tied aid increases the cost of assistance and has the tendency of making donors to focus more on the commercial advancement of their countries than what developing countries need. There are many ways aid can be designed to pursue the commercial objectives of donors. One of such pervasive means is by insisting on donor country products.

Boshqalar ta'kidlashlaricha, donor mamlakatlari mahsulotlariga yordam bog'lash sog'lom fikrdir; bu donor mamlakat biznesini yoki eksportini rivojlantirish uchun yordamdan strategik foydalanishdir. It is further argued that tied aid - if well designed and effectively managed - would not necessarily compromise the quality as well as the effectiveness of aid.[66] Biroq, ushbu dalil, ayniqsa, dastur ma'lum bir loyihalar yoki siyosat bilan bog'liq bo'lgan va tijorat manfaatlari kam bo'lgan yoki umuman bo'lmagan dasturiy yordamga tegishli. It must be emphasized, however, that commercial interest and aid effectiveness are two different things, and it would be difficult to pursue commercial interest without compromising aid effectiveness. Shunday qilib, maksimal darajada rivojlanish g'oyasini tijorat manfaatlarini ko'zlash tushunchasidan ajratish kerak. Bog'langan yordam donorlarning eksport ko'rsatkichlarini yaxshilaydi, mahalliy kompaniyalar uchun biznes yaratadi va ish o'rinlari yaratadi. Shuningdek, bu jahon bozorida xalqaro tajribaga ega bo'lmagan firmalarning fosh qilinishiga yordam beradi.[67]

Boshqa nazariyalar

Despite decades of receiving aid and experiencing different development models (which have had very little success), many developing countries' economies are still dependent on developed countries, and are deep in debt.[68] There is now a growing debate about why developing countries remain impoverished and underdeveloped after all this time. Many argue that current methods of aid are not working and are calling for reducing foreign aid (and therefore dependency) and utilizing different economic theories than the traditional mainstream theories from the West.[69] Historically, development and aid have not accomplished the goals they were meant to, and currently the global gap between the rich and poor is greater than ever,[70] though not everybody agrees with this.[71]

Some scholars argue the problem of development amongst many developing countries through socioeconomic perspectives which study how individuals form organizations amongst each other for all kinds of goals, such as economic matters. Olimlar yoqadi Shimoliy and Weingast claim that modern states are composed of natural states and open access order states whereby open access order states have more positive development than natural states, because in these states, legally binding institutions (rules of the game, customs) allow individuals to freely form impersonal organizations that can attract a large group of people who work or compete with each other economically.[72] The more competition, the more wealth and growth is created. Examples of open access states are many Western countries like the United States and Germany.[73]

In contrast, a natural state (which compromises much of the third world) consists of political elites who try to protect their special privileges by restricting access to the ability to form organizations amongst individuals.[73] These elites must rely on personal communication and the threat of violence to both maintain order and recruit "desirables" into the organizations. Such a set-up not only weakens good governance (as leaders are less accountable) but also leads to weak institutions, where peace is not always assured, as those in control of the means to inflict violence simply restrain themselves out of trust or loyalty, and can easily resort to violence, as has happened in the past (e.g., Biafra against the rest of Nigeria, Bangladesh against the rest of Pakistan).[74]

Ways to improve aid effectiveness

The Paris Declaration embodied a new, broad consensus on what needs to be done to produce better development results.[75] Its principles lay open the possible ways to undertake, which can be interpreted also as the major objectives of good aid: fostering recipient countries' ownership of development policies and strategies, maximizing donors' coordination and harmonization, improving aid transparency and mutual accountability of donors and recipients, just to name a few.[76]

Improving aid transparency and mutual accountability of donors and recipients

The Accra Agenda for Action states that transparency and accountability are essential elements for development results, as well as drivers of progress.[77] Mutual accountability and transparency is one of the five partnership commitments of the Paris Declaration.[78] Through 'transparency', donors and recipients can be held accountable for what they spend and aid can be made more effective by knowing the three Ws of transparency:

  • Who gives money to which recipient?
  • What project is being funded and for what purpose? va
  • Qaerda?[79]

Transparency offers a valuable answer to insecurity, making aid "predictable" and "reliable". Transparency has been shown to improve service delivery and to reduce opportunities for diversion and therefore corruption.[80]

Transparency can be defined as a basic expression of mutual accountability.[81] Mutual accountability can only work if there is a global culture of transparency that demands provision of information through a set of rules and behavioral norms, which are difficult to enforce in the case of official development cooperation. In particular for emerging economy donors and private development assistance, these norms are only at a nascent stage. Xaras[82] suggest to adopt the "regulation through information" approach,[83] which has been developed and has proven its effectiveness in the case of the European integration. In fact, at the international level, when the enforcement of mandatory rules is difficult, the solution could be to provide and make available transparent, relevant, accurate and reliable information, which can be used to reward or sanction individual aid agencies according to their performances. This means establishing a strong culture of accountability within aid, which rewards aid successes but penalizes failures.

To achieve this, literature on the topic[84] suggest that donors should agree on adopting a standardized format for providing information on volume, allocation and results, such as the Xalqaro yordamning shaffofligi tashabbusi (IATI), or other similar standards, and commit to improve recipient countries' databases with technical, financial and informational support. The format should be easily downloadable and with sufficient disaggregation to enable comparison with other data. Making aid data public and comparable among donors, would be likely to encourage a process of positive emulation towards a better usage of public funds. Oxirida, rivojlanish uchun rasmiy yordam (ODA) is a voluntary transfer that depends on the support of donor country taxpayers. Donors should therefore consider improving the transparency and traceability of aid funds also as a way of increasing engagement and support toward aid inside their own country. Moreover, a generalized adoption of IATI would ensure the publication of aid information in a timely way, the compatibility with developing countries' budgets and the reliability of future projections, which would have a strong and positive effect on the predictability of aid.[85]

Finally, to improve accountability while building evaluation capabilities in aid recipient countries and systematically collecting beneficiaries’ feedback, different mechanisms to evaluate and monitor transparency should be considered, such as independent third-party reviews, peer reviews or mutual reviews.[86]

The Global Partnership for Effective Development Cooperation (2011 to present)

The Global Partnership for Effective Development Co-operation (GPEDC) was created at the Fourth High-Level Forum on Aid Effectiveness in Busan in 2011. This platform brings together governments, bilateral and multilateral organisations, civil society, the private sector and representatives from parliaments and trade unions, among others, who are committed to strengthening the effectiveness of their partnerships for development. 161 countries and 56 organisations endorsed the creation of the Global Partnership in the 2011 Busan Partnership agreement.

As a multi-stakeholder platform, the Global Partnership aims to advance the effectiveness of development efforts by all actors in delivering results that are long-lasting and contribute to the achievement of the Barqaror rivojlanish maqsadlari. It provides practical guidance and shares knowledge to boost development impact. It offers a global mechanism to support country-level implementation of the international effectiveness principles agreed in Busan: country ownership, focus on results, inclusive partnerships; and transparency and accountability. As noted in the UN Secretary General's Synthesis report in 2015, the Global Partnership can “help review and strengthen the global partnership for sustainable development”.

The Global Partnership also tracks progress on the implementation of the commitments and actions agreed in Busan through its monitoring framework, which consists of a set of indicators, that focus on strengthening developing country institutions, increasing transparency and predictability of development co-operation, enhancing gender equality, as well as supporting greater involvement of civil society, parliaments and private sector in development efforts.

Global monitoring rounds on development effectiveness commitments

Starting in 2013, the Global Partnership took the lead in facilitating national monitoring exercises of the Busan development effectiveness commitments, which were then condensed into global monitoring reports. This process was a continuation of the Paris Declaration on Aid Effectiveness monitoring surveys, but this time under the leadership of each developing country and relying on multi-stakeholder participation.

2016 global monitoring round

Results from the Global Partnership's 2016 monitoring round reveal important progress towards achieving the development effectiveness goals agreed in Busan in 2011 at the Fourth High-Level Forum on Aid Effectiveness, especially in adopting a decisive focus on results for more impact at the country level, in setting good foundations for more effective partnerships amongst governments, civil society organisation, and the private sector; in improving transparency by making more publicly available information on development co-operation available than ever before, and in enhancing national budgetary systems to better capture development co-operation flows and allocations for gender equality.[87] In contrast, monitoring also reveals an overall need to adapt to a dynamic and evolving development landscape, as well as specific areas where a concerted effort is required to enhance development partnerships and unlock existing bottlenecks, including: increasing the use of countries’ own systems to deliver, manage, and track the impact of development programmes; and making countries’ efforts to strengthen domestic institutions more effective. Engagement and accountability structures at country level around development co-operation also need to become more inclusive and transparent, in order to facilitate meaningful dialogue and joint action.[87]

2018 global monitoring round

The 2018 monitoring round revealed that the 86 participating developing countries have made significant progress in strengthening national development planning, and that overall mutual accountability mechanisms in developing countries are becoming more inclusive. However, the monitoring results highlighted a decline in donor countries’ alignment to developing countries’ priorities and results frameworks; moreover, the forward visibility of development cooperation is decreasing, which contrasts with the global commitment to improving aid predictability. Civil society organisations were also found to be experiencing a deterioration in the conditions and overall environment for them to operate and contribute to development. The monitoring results further revealed that improving the quality of public-private dialogue in developing countries requires increased capacity, strengthened relevance and the inclusion of a wide range of private sector actors.[88]

The International Health Partnership's work on aid effectiveness (2007 to present)

The Xalqaro sog'liqni saqlash bo'yicha hamkorlik (IHP+) is a group of national governments, development partners, fuqarolik jamiyati and others committed to improving the health of citizens in developing countries. The initiative was launched in September 2007, bringing together 26 signatories to sign a Global Compact[89] for achieving the health Mingyillik rivojlanish maqsadlari. As of May 2012, 56 signatories have signed the Global Compact. The partnership is jointly administered by the Jahon Sog'liqni saqlash tashkiloti va Jahon banki.

Improving health and health services is a complex task in any country. It involves coordination between governments, health workers, civil society, parliamentarians, and other stakeholders. Rivojlanayotgan mamlakatlarda sog'liqni saqlash uchun pul ichki va tashqi manbalardan kelib chiqadi. This means governments must work with a range of international development partners. These are increasing in number, use different funding streams and have diverse bureaucratic demands. As a result, efforts can become fragmented and resources can be wasted.

IHP+ puts international principles for aid effectiveness and development cooperation set forth in the Yordam samaradorligi to'g'risida Parij deklaratsiyasi, Accra Agenda for Action and Busan Partnership for Effective Development Co-operation into practice in the health sector by encouraging wide support for a single national health strategy or plan, a single monitoring and evaluation framework, and a strong emphasis on mutual partner accountability. The Partnership aims to build confidence between all in-country stakeholders whose activities affect health.

Shuningdek qarang

Adabiyotlar

  1. ^ Aid Effectiveness and Governance: The Good, the Bad and the Ugly Arxivlandi 2009-10-09 da Orqaga qaytish mashinasi, Daniel Kaufmann, Brookings Institution, 2009
  2. ^ Omaka, Arua Oko (1 June 2016). "Humanitarian Action: The Joint Church Aid and Health Care Intervention in the Nigeria-Biafra War, 1967–1970". Kanada tarixi jurnali. 49 (3): 423–227. doi:10.3138/cjh.49.3.423.
  3. ^ Waal, Alexander De (1991). Yomon kunlar: Efiopiyada o'ttiz yillik urush va ocharchilik. Human Rights Watch tashkiloti. p.2. ISBN  9781564320384.
  4. ^ Lewis D. (2010) "Nongovernmental Organizations, Definition and History" (PDF). In: Anheier H.K., Toepler S. (eds) Fuqarolik jamiyati xalqaro ensiklopediyasi. Springer, Nyu-York, Nyu-York.
  5. ^ Dunning, Thad. "Conditioning the Effects of Aid: Cold War Politics, Donor Credibility, and Democracy in Africa." International Organization 58.02 (2004)
  6. ^ "International Conference on Financing for Development". Un.org. Olingan 2012-12-26.
  7. ^ "Birlashgan Millatlar Tashkilotining Ming yillik rivojlanish maqsadlari". Un.org. 2008-09-25. Olingan 2012-12-26.
  8. ^ "Aid Harmonization: The Collective Efforts to Increase Aid Effectiveness | Banking Sense". Olingan 2019-07-04.
  9. ^ "OECD.org - OECD". www.oecd.org. Olingan 2019-07-04.
  10. ^ [accrahlf.net]
  11. ^ Dinosaurs at work Arxivlandi 2010-07-06 da Orqaga qaytish mashinasi, Rivojlanish va hamkorlik, Jild 36, 2009, No. 12
  12. ^ "IHP+ The International Health Partnership". Internationalhealthpartnership.net. Olingan 2012-12-26.
  13. ^ Garret, Lori. 2007. The Challenge of Global Health. Tashqi ishlar 86 (1):14-38]
  14. ^ "Effective development co-operation - OECD". www.oecd.org. Olingan 2019-07-11.
  15. ^ Fengler, M.G and Kharas, H. Delivering Aid Differently: Lesson from the Field. Brookings Institution, Washington D.C. 2010.
  16. ^ Kharas, H., Makino, K., Jung, W. Catalizing Development. Brookings Institution Press, Washington D.C. 2011
  17. ^ Kharas, H. "Measuring the Cost of Aid Volatility". Wolfensohn Centre for Development, Working Parper 3, Brookings Institution, Washington D.C. 2008
  18. ^ Park, K., "New Development Partners and a Global Development Partnership". In Kharas, H., Makino, K., Jung, W. Catalizing Development, Brooking Institution Press, Washington D.C. 2011.
  19. ^ Kragelund, P. "The Potential Role of Non-Traditional Donors' Aid in Africa", International Center for Trade and Sustainable Development, 2010.
  20. ^ As an example, in 2005, government authorities in Vietnam received 791 missions from donors, which means more than two a day, including weekends and holidays. See, for example, OECD, DAC, "The Challenge of Capacity Development: Working Towards Good Practice", Paris, 2006.
  21. ^ Deutscher, E., and Fyson, S., "Improving the Effectiveness of Aid", Moliya va taraqqiyot, Jild 25, n. 3, The International Monetary Fund, September 2008.
  22. ^ a b Killen, B., "How Much Does Aid Effectiveness Improve Development Outcomes? Lessons from Recent Practice", Busan Background Papers, OECD/DAC, 2011.
  23. ^ MacFarquhar, N., "UN Poverty Goals face accountability questions," The New York Times, on line, September 18, 2010. Available at <https://www.nytimes.com/2010/09/19/world/19nations.html > [accessed on 24 September 2011]
  24. ^ Easterly, W., The White Man’s Burden: Why the West's efforts to aid the rest have done so much ill and so little good. Penguin Press, New York, 2006.
  25. ^ As Jeffrey Sachs wrote in the Guardian, “the Horn of Africa crisis is a warning to the World.” See Sachs, J., "The Horn of Africa crisis is a warning to the world.", Guardian, [on line] July 28, 2011. Accessed on 24 September 2011
  26. ^ OECD, "Aid Effectiveness 2005-10: Progress in implementing the Paris Declaration", OECD Publishing, Paris, 2011.
  27. ^ "OECD.org - OECD". www.oecd.org. Olingan 2018-07-04.
  28. ^ "Development Assistance Committee (DAC) - OECD". www.oecd.org. Olingan 2018-07-04.
  29. ^ "Yordam samaradorligi - Iqtisodiy hamkorlik va rivojlanish tashkiloti". Oecd.org. Olingan 2012-12-26.
  30. ^ "DAC working party on aid effectiveness". ODI. Olingan 2018-07-04.
  31. ^ "Third High Level Forum on Aid Effectiveness - OECD". www.oecd.org. Olingan 2018-07-04.
  32. ^ "Paris Declaration and Accra Agenda for Action - OECD". www.oecd.org. Olingan 2018-07-04.
  33. ^ "Paris Declaration | Open Government Partnership". www.opengovpartnership.org. Olingan 2018-07-04.
  34. ^ "Aid statistics - Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development". Oecd.org. Olingan 2012-12-26.
  35. ^ "Evaluation of development programmes - Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development". Oecd.org. Olingan 2012-12-26.
  36. ^ "Gender equality and development - Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development". Oecd.org. 2012-02-01. Olingan 2012-12-26.
  37. ^ "Environment and development - Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development". Oecd.org. Olingan 2012-12-26.
  38. ^ "Poverty reduction - Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development". Oecd.org. Olingan 2012-12-26.
  39. ^ "Governance and development - Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development". Oecd.org. Olingan 2012-12-26.
  40. ^ [1] Arxivlandi 2008 yil 17-may, soat Orqaga qaytish mashinasi
  41. ^ Henderson, J. Vernon; Lee, Yong Suk (2015). "Organization of Disaster Aid Delivery". Iqtisodiy rivojlanish va madaniy o'zgarishlar. 63 (4): 617–664. doi:10.1086/681277. S2CID  14147459.
  42. ^ Mosley, Paul (1987). Foreign Aid: Its Defense and Reform. Kentukki universiteti matbuoti. ISBN  978-0-8131-1608-2. Olingan 7 dekabr, 2009. Paul Mosley.
  43. ^ Barder, Owen (2009-04-21). "What is Poverty Reduction?". CGD Working Papers. Olingan 2010-06-02.
  44. ^ Faust, Jörg (2009). "Reliable evidence of impact". Rivojlanish va hamkorlik. 36 (1): 14–17. Arxivlandi asl nusxasi 2010-02-27 da.
  45. ^ Moyo, Dambisa (2009). Aid: Why Aid Is Not Working and How There Is a Better Way for Africa. Duglas va Makintayr. ISBN  978-1-55365-542-8.
  46. ^ Moyo, Dambisa (2009). O'lik yordam: Nima uchun yordam ishlamayapti va Afrika uchun qanday yaxshi yo'l bor. Duglas va Makintayr. p. 124.
  47. ^ Burnside, Craig; Dollar, David (September 2000). Amerika iqtisodiy sharhi. 90 (4): 847–868. doi:10.1257/aer.90.4.847. S2CID  14261087.CS1 maint: sarlavhasiz davriy nashr (havola)
  48. ^ Roodman, David (2007). "The Anarchy of Numbers: Aid, Development and Cross-Country Empirics". Jahon bankining iqtisodiy sharhi. 21 (2): 255–277. doi:10.1093/wber/lhm004. hdl:10.1093/wber/lhm004. S2CID  14359188.
  49. ^ Bräutigam, Deborah (2002). "Building Leviathan: Revenue, State Capacity and Governance" (PDF). IDS byulleteni. 33 (3): 1–17. doi:10.1111/j.1759-5436.2002.tb00034.x.
  50. ^ "An Aid-Institutions Paradox? A Review Essay on Aid Dependency and State Building in Sub-Saharan Africa- Working Paper 74". Global Taraqqiyot Markazi. Olingan 2017-05-17.
  51. ^ Pritchett, Lant; Woolcock, Michael; Andrews, Matt (2013-01-01). "Looking Like a State: Techniques of Persistent Failure in State Capability for Implementation" (PDF). Rivojlanishni o'rganish jurnali. 49 (1): 1–18. doi:10.1080/00220388.2012.709614. ISSN  0022-0388. S2CID  14363040.
  52. ^ Nunn, Natan; Nancy Qian (24 September 2010). "Aiding Conflict: The Unintended Consequences of U.S. Food Aid on Civil War". Paper Presented at the BREAD/NBER Conference.
  53. ^ Clemens MA; va boshq. (2011). "Counting Chickens when they Hatch: Timing and the Effects of Aid on Growth". Iqtisodiy jurnal. 122 (561): 590–617. doi:10.1111 / j.1468-0297.2011.02482.x.
  54. ^ Petrikova, Ivica (2015). "Aid for food security: does it work?" (PDF). Xalqaro taraqqiyot muammolari jurnali. 14: 41–59. doi:10.1108/IJDI-07-2014-0058.
  55. ^ "Comprehensive thinking". Arxivlandi asl nusxasi 2010-07-06 da. Olingan 2010-03-11.
  56. ^ Svensson, Jakob. "Aid, Growth and Democracy." Economics and Politics 11.3 (1999): 275-97.
  57. ^ "Qidiruv natijalari". ODI. Olingan 2019-07-04.
  58. ^ Wathne, Cecilie and Hedger, Edward 2009. Aid effectiveness through the recipient lens
  59. ^ "Nashrlar". ODI. Olingan 2019-07-04.
  60. ^ Shikwati, James (2006). "The Future of Africa in the World". Inter Region Economic Network: 6. Arxivlangan asl nusxasi 2013-06-17.
  61. ^ De Soto, Hernando (2000). Kapital sirlari: nega kapitalizm G'arbda g'alaba qozonadi va hamma joyda barbod bo'ladi. Asosiy kitoblar.
  62. ^ Collier, Paul (2007). The Bottom Billion: Why the Poorest Countries Are failing and What Can Be Done about It. Oksford.
  63. ^ Fisih, Uilyam (2006). The White Man's Burden: Why the West's Efforts to Aid the Rest Have Done so Much Ill and so Little Good. New york: Penguin Press.
  64. ^ Dambisa, Moyo. "Dambisa Moyo on why aid has been a disaster for Africa".
  65. ^ Moyo, Dambisa (2009). O'lik yordam: Nima uchun yordam ishlamayapti va Afrika uchun qanday yaxshi yo'l bor. Duglas va Makintayr. p. 79.
  66. ^ Aryeetey, 1995; Sowa 1997.
  67. ^ Tied Aid and Multi-Donor Budgetary Support, Xalqaro taraqqiyot jurnali, Vol 17. Issue 8
  68. ^ улутlaronline.org, klaus kästle -. "First, Second, and Third World - Nations Online Project". www.nationsonline.org. Olingan 2018-03-28.
  69. ^ Mehmet, Ozay, (1995). Mainstream economic development theories have failed to come up with a model that appropriately supports development in developing countries. Westernizing the Third World (Ch 1), Routledge
  70. ^ Westra, Richard (2011). "Renewing Socialist Development in the Third World", Zamonaviy Osiyo jurnali, 41(4): 519-543.
  71. ^ Korotayev A., Zinkina J. On the structure of the present-day convergence. Campus-Wide Information Systems. Vol. 31 No. 2/3, 2014, pp. 139-152
  72. ^ North, D.C; Wallis, J.J; Weingast, R. (2009). Violence and social orders a conceptual framework for interpreting recorded human history. Nyu-York: Kembrij universiteti matbuoti. p. 11.
  73. ^ a b North, D.C; Wallis, J.J; Weingast, R. (2009). Violence and social orders a conceptual framework for interpreting recorded human history. Nyu-York: Kembrij universiteti matbuoti. p. 18.
  74. ^ North, D.C; Wallis, J.J; Weingast, R. (2009). Violence and social orders a conceptual framework for interpreting recorded human history. Nyu-York: Kembrij universiteti matbuoti. p. 21.
  75. ^ "Effective development co-operation - OECD". www.oecd.org. Olingan 2019-07-04.
  76. ^ See OECD, "The Paris Declaration on Aid Effectiveness". 2005 yil 2 mart.
  77. ^ OECD, "The Accra Agenda For Action", 3rd High Level Forum on Aid Effectiveness, September 4, 2008.
  78. ^ OECD, "The Paris Declaration on Aid Effectiveness". 2005 yil 2 mart.
  79. ^ Kharas, H., "Transparency: Changing the Accountability Engagement, and Effectiveness of Aid", in: Kharas, H., Makino, K., Jung, W., "Catalyzing Development", Brookings Institution Press, Washington, D.C. 2011.
  80. ^ Bjorkman, M., Svensson, J., "Power to the People: Evidence from a Randomized Field Experience on Community-Based Monitoring in Uganda", Har chorakda Iqtisodiyot jurnali 124, yo'q. 2: 735-69, 2009.
  81. ^ Mary Robinson’s definition, in the OECD Survey on Monitoring The Paris Declaration, 2008.
  82. ^ See Kharas, H., "Transparency: Changing the Accountability Engagement, and Effectiveness of Aid", in: Kharas, H., Makino, K., Jung, W., "Catalyzing Development", Brookings Institution Press, Washington, D.C. 2011.
  83. ^ Majone, G. "The new European Agencies: regulation by information", Evropa davlat siyosati jurnali 4, yo'q. 2: 262-75, 1997.
  84. ^ See, for example, Pranay, S., and Hubbard, M., "A Future for Aid Data: Research towards a South-South Cooperation Data Categorization to complement on-going IATI Categorizations’", ongoing research, DFID Future of Aid and Beyond Research Competition 2010-11, 2011.
  85. ^ Kharas, H., Makino, K., Jung, W., "Catalyzing Development", Brookings Institution Press, Washington, D.C. 2011.
  86. ^ See Droop, J., Isenman, P., and Mlalazi, B., "Mutual accountability in Aid Effectiveness: International-Level Mechanisms", Briefing Note, n.3, Oxford Policy Management, 2008.
  87. ^ a b OECD/UNDP (2016). Making Development Co-operation More Effective: 2016 Progress Report. Retrieved on 09 Dec 2016 from http://effectivecooperation.org/2016/11/2016-monitoring-report-released/
  88. ^ "Making Development Co-operation More Effective, 2019 Progress Report - GPEDC". www.oecd.org. Olingan 2020-05-20.
  89. ^ PDF-ning Global Compact-dan imzolangan versiyasi Arxivlandi 2012-02-26 da Orqaga qaytish mashinasi

Tashqi havolalar