Buddizm va zo'ravonlik - Buddhism and violence - Wikipedia

Ushbu maqola bir qator
Dinni tanqid qilish

Buddaviy yozuvlarda zo'ravonlik har qanday shaklda qoralanadi. Aximsa, "shikast etkazmaslik" ma'nosini anglatuvchi atama buddizmda asosiy fazilatdir.[1] Ushbu maqola buddistlarning zo'ravonlikka oid tamoyillarini muhokama qiladi, shuningdek, buddistlar tomonidan zo'ravonlik, shu jumladan, tajovuzkorlik harakatlariga oid ba'zi tarixiy holatlarni keltiradi. Buddistlar siyosiy va ijtimoiy-madaniy motivlar bilan, shuningdek, zohidlar tomonidan zo'ravonlik yoki diniy maqsadlarda.[2] [3] Ushbu tarixiy holatlarga qaramay, Buddaning ta'limoti va yozuvlariga kelsak, buddizm ziddiyatlarni hal qilish uchun zo'ravonlikni taqiqlaydi.[4] Ba'zi buddist jamoalarida zamonaviy zo'ravonlik yoki zo'ravonlikni targ'ib qilish tobora ko'payib bormoqda, xususan Myanma hukumati tomonidan rohinjalarni ta'qib qilish.[5]

Ta'limlar, talqinlar va amaliyotlar

Bhikxus, garchi qaroqchilar sizni ikki qo'lli arra bilan vahshiylarcha oyoq-qo'llaring bilan uzib tashlasalar ham, ularga nisbatan nafrat fikrini paydo qilgan kishi mening ta'limotimni bajarmaydi.

- Kakacūpama Sutta, Majjhima-Nikāya 28 da MN i 128-29[6]

Buddizm turli xil urf-odatlar, e'tiqodlar va ma'naviy amaliyotlarni o'z ichiga oladi Gautama Budda.[7]

Nirvana buddaviylik yo'lining maqsadi va uni yo'q qilishning eng qadimgi va eng keng tarqalgan atamasidir duxha - "azoblanish", "og'riq" yoki "qoniqarsizlik" ni tug'ma ravishda o'z ichiga olgan hayot tabiati.[8] Zo'ravon harakatlar va fikrlar, boshqalarga zarar etkazadigan va ularni buzadigan harakatlar va shu kabi fikrlar, ma'naviy o'sish va o'z-o'zini mag'lub qilish yo'lida to'sqinlik qiladi, bu esa mavjudlik maqsadiga olib keladi va ular odatda malakasiz (akusala) hisoblanadi va olib kelishi mumkin emas Nirvananing maqsadi. Budda tirik jonzotlarni o'ldirish yoki ularga ziyon etkazishni qoralagan va aks ettirishga yoki ongli bo'lishga undaydi (satipatthana ) to'g'ri harakat (yoki xulq-atvor) sifatida, shuning uchun "harakatning o'zi yoki / yoki boshqalarga zarar etkazishi yoki qilmasligi atrofida harakatlarning to'g'riligi yoki noto'g'riligi". Ambalattika-Rahulovada Sutta, Budda aytadi Rahula:

Agar siz, Rahula, tanangiz bilan biron bir ishni qilishni xohlasangiz, tanangiz bilan qilgan ishingiz haqida mulohaza yuritishingiz kerak, shunda: Men tan bilan qilishni xohlaganim, bu zarar etkazishi mumkin bo'lgan tananing ishidir. o'z-o'zidan va boshqalarga zarar etkazishi mumkin bo'lgan va ikkalasiga ham zarar etkazadigan; badanning bu ishi malakasiz (akusala), uning hosilasi azob, natijasi iztirob.[9][10][11]

To'g'ri harakat yoki to'g'ri xatti-harakatlar (samyak-karmānta / sammā-kammanta) ning to'rtinchi tomoni Asil sakkizta yo'l va amaliyotchi o'zini buzilgan yoki o'ziga yoki boshqalarga zarar etkazadigan yo'llar bilan harakat qilmasdan, o'zini faoliyatida axloqan to'g'ri tutishga o'rgatishi kerakligi aytilgan. In Xitoy va Pali Canon, quyidagicha izohlanadi:

Va to'g'ri harakat nima? Dan saqlanish hayotni olib, dan o'g'irlik va noqonuniy ravishda jinsiy aloqa [yoki jinsiy buzuqlik]. Bunga to'g'ri harakat deyiladi.

— Sakkavibhanga Sutta[12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19]

Oddiy izdosh uchun Cunda Kammaraputta Sutta batafsil bayon qiladi:

Qanday qilib tanani harakat qilish orqali uchta usulda poklanish mumkin? Hayotni qabul qilishni tark etgan ma'lum bir odam hayotni olishni rad etadigan holat mavjud. U hamma tirik mavjudotlarning farovonligi uchun mehribon, rahmdil, ... pichog'i qo'yilgan holda yashaydi. Berilmaganni olishdan voz kechib, berilmaganni olishdan tiyiladi. U o'g'ri kabi, qishloqda yoki cho'lda boshqalarga tegishli bo'lgan va ular tomonidan berilmagan narsalarni olmaydi.[20][21][22]

Sarambha "zo'ravonlik bilan birga" deb tarjima qilinishi mumkin. Lobha, dosa va moha bilan to'ldirilgan aql (nafs, nafrat va aldanish) akusala harakatlariga olib keladi. Zo'ravonlik bilan shug'ullanish o'z-o'ziga zarar etkazish shaklidir.[9] Jamiyatdagi zo'ravonlikning rad etilishi buddizmda jamiyat a'zolarining ma'naviy taraqqiyotining zaruriy sharti sifatida tan olingan, chunki zo'ravonlik o'ziga o'xshash hissiyotlarga ega bo'lgan jonzotlarga og'riq keltiradi. Budda keltirilgan Dhammapada "Hamma tayoqdan qo'rqadi, hamma jonini aziz tutadi. O'zini boshqaning o'rniga qo'yib, boshqalarni urmaslik yoki o'ldirmaslik kerak".[9][23][24] Metta (mehribon mehr-oqibat), barcha mavjudotlar uchun cheksiz xayrixohlik ruhiyatini rivojlantirish va karuna, rahm-shafqat insonni qiynayotgan odamni ko'rganingizda paydo bo'ladi, bu munosabat ajoyib yoki ulug'vor, chunki ular tirik mavjudotlarga nisbatan to'g'ri yoki ideal muomala usuli (sattesu samma patipatti).[25] The Sutta Nipata "" Men qanday bo'lsam, ular ham shunday. Men qanday bo'lsam, men ham shundayman "deydi. Parallellikni o'zingiz bilan solishtiring, na o'ldiring va na boshqalarni o'ldirishga majbur qiling. "[9][26][27][28]

Buddizmda, qabul qilish boshpana ichida Dharma -lardan biri Uch marvarid - boshqalarga zarar etkazmaslik kerak sezgir mavjudotlar. The Nirvana Sutra "Qimmatli Dharma-dan panoh topgan holda, uning ongi boshqalarga zarar etkazish yoki zarar etkazishdan xoli bo'lishi kerak".[29] Lardan biri Besh amr buddaviy axloq qoidalari yoki śīla "Men o'ldirishdan saqlanish uchun o'qitish qoidasini o'z zimmamga olaman", deb ta'kidlaydi.[17][30][31][32] Xabarlarga ko'ra Budda "G'alaba nafratni tug'diradi. Mag'lub bo'lganlar azob bilan yashaydilar. Baxtimizga tinchlikparvarlik g'alaba va mag'lubiyatdan voz kechadi".[33][34] Ushbu elementlar buddizmning pasifistik ekanligini va buddistlar tomonidan qilinadigan barcha zo'ravonliklarni, hattoki rohiblar, ehtimol iqtisodiy yoki siyosiy sabablarga bog'liq.[35]

To'g'ri nutqni o'rgatish (samyag-vāc / samma-vaka"Sakkiz martabali yo'lda" har qanday zararli (zararli va qattiq nutq) va bo'linishlarga olib keladigan barcha nutqlarni qoralang, mulohazali va foydali usullar bilan gapirishga undang. The Pali Canon tushuntirdi:

Va to'g'ri nutq nima? Yolg'on gapirishdan, bo'linish nutqidan, haqoratli so'zlardan va bo'sh suhbatlardan saqlanish: Bunga to'g'ri nutq deyiladi.[13][14][15][16][18][12][19][36]

Maykl Jerryson,[37] Ogayo shtatidagi diniy tadqiqotlar bo'yicha dotsent Youngstown davlat universiteti va kitobning hammuallifi Buddistlar urushi, "buddizm qotillik sodir etishda" niyat "ga qaraganda kamroq e'tibor qaratilishi bilan farq qiladi" va "esda tutish kerak bo'lgan birinchi narsa shundaki, odamlarda zo'ravonlikka moyillik bor, shunchaki har bir dinda odamlar bor unda. "[38]

Gananat Obeyesekere, Zo'r professor Antropologiya da Princeton universiteti, "buddistlarning ta'limot an'analarida ... toqat qilmaslik, zo'ravonlikni oqlash, hatto" adolatli urushlar "yoki" muqaddas urushlar "tushunchasi mavjud emas. ... buddistlik ta'limotini zo'ravonlik va murosasizlik mafkurasi bilan mantiqan yarashtirish mumkin emas degan fikrni bildirish mumkin "[23]

Ammo buddizmda zohidlik yoki norozilikning bir shakli sifatida o'zini o'zi zo'rlash va o'limga duchor qilishning uzoq an'analari mavjud,[2] Xitoy rohiblari orasida qat'iyatni ko'rsatish uchun yong'in va kuyishdan foydalanish yoki bu kabi rohiblarning o'zini o'zi yoqib yuborishi misol bo'la oladi. Thích Quảng Đức Vetnam urushi paytida.

Mintaqaviy misollar

Janubi-sharqiy Osiyo

Tailand

Shuningdek qarang: Tailanddagi buddizm

Yilda Janubi-sharqiy Osiyo, Tailand buddistlarning bir necha taniqli zo'ravonlik chaqiriqlariga ega edi. 70-yillarda Fra Kittivutto singari millatchi buddist rohiblar kommunistlarni o'ldirish buddistlarning hech qanday ko'rsatmalariga zid kelmaydi, degan fikrni ilgari surdilar.[39] Jangari tomoni Tailand buddizmi 2004 yilda Tailandning chuqur janubida malay musulmonlari qo'zg'oloni boshlanganda yana taniqli bo'ldi. Dastlab buddist rohiblar mojaroni e'tiborsiz qoldirishdi, chunki ular siyosiy, diniy emas deb qarashdi, lekin oxir-oqibat ular "shaxsiyatni shakllantirish" ni qabul qildilar, chunki amaliy haqiqatlar diniy ideallardan chetga chiqishni talab qiladi.[40]

Myanma

Asosiy maqola: 2013 yil Birma musulmonlarga qarshi tartibsizliklar
Shuningdek qarang: Myanmadagi buddizm
Shuningdek qarang: Myanmadagi inson huquqlari

So'nggi yillarda Davlat tinchligi va taraqqiyot kengashi (SPDC), harbiy rejim ning Birma 1988 yildan 2011 yilgacha assimilyatsiya kampaniyasi doirasida etnik ozchiliklarni, ko'pincha kuch bilan konvertatsiya qilishni qat'iyan rag'batlantirgan. Rejim birma buddaviy millatchiligini madaniy va siyosiy mafkura sifatida qarama-qarshi hukmronligini qonuniylashtirish uchun ko'rishni ilgari surdi, buddizm va uning o'rtasida diniy sinkretizmni yaratishga harakat qildi. totalitar mafkura.[41]

The Safron inqilobi, 2007 yil davomida bo'lib o'tgan bir qator iqtisodiy va siyosiy norozilik namoyishlari talabalar, siyosiy faollar, shu jumladan ayollar va buddist rohiblar tomonidan olib borildi va kampaniya shaklini oldi. zo'ravonliksiz qarshilik, ba'zan ham chaqiriladi fuqarolik qarshiligi.[42]

Namoyishlarga javoban o'nlab namoyishchilar hibsga olingan yoki hibsga olingan. 2007 yil sentyabr oyidan boshlab minglab buddist rohiblar boshchiligidagi norozilik namoyishlari boshlandi va 2007 yil sentyabr oyi oxirlarida hukumatning yangi tazyiqlariga qadar davom etishga ruxsat berildi.[43] Kamida 184 namoyishchi otib o'ldirilgan va ko'plari qiynoqqa solingan. SPDC bo'yicha Birma armiyasi etnik ozchilik aholisiga qarshi harbiy hujumlar bilan shug'ullangan, buzilgan harakatlarni sodir etgan xalqaro gumanitar huquq.[44]

Myanma buddistlar tajovuzining qal'asiga aylangan edi va bunday harakatlar qattiqqo'l millatchi rohiblar tomonidan qo'zg'atilgan.[45][46][47][48][49] Mintaqadagi eng qadimgi jangari tashkilot Demokratik Karen buddistlar armiyasi (DKBA), 1992 yildan beri buddist rohib U Thuzana boshchiligida.[50] So'nggi yillarda rohiblar va terroristik harakatlar millatchi bilan bog'liq 969 harakat ayniqsa Myanma va qo'shni xalqlarda.[51][52] Zo'ravonlik taniqli bo'lgan 2012 yil iyun 200 dan ortiq odam halok bo'lganida va 100,000 atrofida ko'chirilganida.[53][54] 2012 yilga kelib, rohiblar tomonidan "969" harakati (ular orasida taniqli shaxslar ham bor) Wirathu ) yaratishda yordam bergan edi Islomga qarshi mintaqadagi millatchi harakatlar va Myanma buddistlarini boykot qilishga undagan Musulmon natijada xizmatlar va savdolar Birmadagi musulmonlarni ta'qib qilish Buddistlar boshchiligidagi olomon tomonidan. Biroq, aybdorlarning barchasi ham buddistlar emas edi va motivlar diniy kabi iqtisodiy edi.[51][55][56] 2013 yil 20-iyun kuni Wirathu-ning muqovasida eslatib o'tilgan Time jurnali "Buddist terrorning yuzi" sifatida.[57] Ga ko'ra Human Rights Watch tashkiloti Xabarda aytilishicha, Birma hukumati va mahalliy hokimiyat 125 mingdan ziyod odamning majburan ko'chirilishida muhim rol o'ynagan Rohinja xalqi va mintaqadagi boshqa musulmonlar. Hisobotda 2012 yil oktyabr oyida Birma rasmiylari, jamoat rahbarlari va buddist rohiblar tomonidan aholini terror qilish va majburan boshqa joyga ko'chirish uchun turli shaharlarda uyushtirilgan hujumlar aniqlangan.[58] The zo'ravonlik ning Meiktila, Lashio (2013) va Mandalay (2014) - Birmadagi buddistlarning so'nggi zo'ravonliklari.[59][60][61][62]

Buddizmning an'anaviy tinchlik tushunchalarini qattiq tanqid qilgan bir necha kitoblarning muallifi Maykl Jerrison "Birma buddist rohiblari zo'ravonlikni boshlamagan bo'lishi mumkin, ammo ular to'lqinda yurib, ko'proq qo'zg'ata boshladilar. Buddistlarning kanonik matnlari ideallari tinchlikni va pasifizm, haqiqat va me'yorlar o'rtasidagi kelishmovchiliklar ijtimoiy, siyosiy va iqtisodiy ishonchsizlik davrida, masalan, Myanmaning hozirgi demokratiyaga o'tishi davrida osongina rivojlanib boradi. "[63]

Shu bilan birga bir qancha buddistlar rahbarlari Thích Nhất Hạnh, Bxikxu Bodhi, Shodo Xarada va Dalay Lama boshqalar qatori Myanmadagi musulmonlarga qarshi zo'ravonlikni qoraladi va tinchlikka chaqirdi, buddistlarning zarar etkazmaslik, o'zaro hurmat va rahm-shafqat tamoyillari amaliyotini qo'llab-quvvatladi. Dalay-Lama "Budda har doim bizni kechirimlilik, bag'rikenglik, rahm-shafqat haqida o'rgatadi. Agar sizning ongingizning bir burchagida qandaydir tuyg'u sizni urmoqchi bo'lsa yoki o'ldirmoqchi bo'lsa, iltimos, Buddaning e'tiqodini yodda saqlang. Biz Buddaning izdoshlarimiz." Uning so'zlariga ko'ra, "barcha muammolar dialog orqali, suhbat orqali hal qilinishi kerak. Zo'ravonlik foydalanish eskirgan va muammolarni hech qachon hal qilmaydi".[64][65]

Maung Zarni, Birma demokratiyasi himoyachisi, inson huquqlari bo'yicha tashviqotchi va tadqiqotchi London iqtisodiyot maktabi Myanma va Shri-Lankadagi zo'ravonliklar to'g'risida yozgan kishi, bunga yo'l yo'qligini ta'kidlamoqda fundamentalizm buddizmda. "Hech bir buddist bo'la olmaydi millatparvar ", dedi Zarni," Buddistlar uchun mamlakat yo'q. Aytmoqchimanki, "men", "mening" jamoam, "mening" mamlakatim, "mening" irqim va hatto "mening" imonim kabi narsalar yo'q. "[66]

Janubiy Osiyo

Hindiston

Ashokavadana (milodiy 3-asrdan matn) ommaviy ravishda o'ldirilganligini aytadi Ajivikalar ga ta'zim qilgan Buddaning rasmini chizish uchun Nataputta (Mahavira) tomonidan Shoh Ashoka unda 18000 atrofida Ajivikalar o'ldirilgan.[67] Biroq, bu hisob munozarali.[68][69] K.T.S.ning so'zlariga ko'ra Sarao va Benimadhab Barua, Ashoka tomonidan raqib mazhablarni ta'qib qilish haqidagi voqealar mazhablararo targ'ibot natijasida paydo bo'lgan aniq to'qima bo'lib ko'rinadi.[68][69][70] O'sha paytda Buddani inson qiyofasida aks ettirish odati boshlanmagan va matn Nirgrantas va Ajivikalar bilan to'qnash keladi.[71]

Shri-Lanka

Shuningdek qarang: Shri-Lankadagi buddizm, 1915 yil Seylonadagi tartibsizliklar, Mavanella tartibsizliklari, Qora iyul, Shri-Lankadagi 2014 yilgi musulmonlarga qarshi tartibsizliklar va Shri-Lankada 2018 yilgi musulmonlarga qarshi tartibsizliklar

Shri-Lankadagi buddizm noyob tarixga ega va shakllanishida muhim rol o'ynagan Sinhal tili millatchilik o'ziga xosligi. Binobarin, siyosiylashtirilgan buddizm orolda etnik ziddiyatlarga hissa qo'shdi, chunki Sinhalese Buddist aholisi va boshqa ozchiliklar, xususan Tamillar.

Zo'ravonlik Shri-Lanka buddizmga tegishli o'nlab yillar davomida mavjud bo'lgan. Ushbu zo'ravonlik bir necha yil oldin tamal xalqini sinhallarning ko'pchiligi tomonidan ta'qib qilinishi bilan yuzaga kelgan. Biroq, ko'p yillik diskriminatsiyadan so'ng tamilliklar Tamil Eilamning ozodlik yo'lbarslari (LTTE) Shri-Lankaning shimoliy-sharqiy mintaqasi uchun kurash olib bordi va bu tamil aholisi uchun mustaqil davlatga aylanadi. Ushbu fuqarolik urushi o'ttiz yil davom etdi va oxiriga qadar taxminan 40,000 kishining hayotiga zomin bo'ldi. Urush 2009 yil may oyida ko'pchilik Sinhal hukumati LTTE rahbarini o'ldirganida tugadi Velupillay Prabxakaran.[72] Urushdan keyin Shri-Lankada uchta ustun guruh qoldi, shu jumladan Sinhal tili bu aholining 70 foizini (aksariyati buddistlar), 10 foizini tashkil etdi Tamilcha aholisi (asosan hindu) va 10% musulmonlar.[73] Shri-Lankada milliy til yoki din bildirilmaganligi sababli buddizm millatchiligi buddizmda hukmronlik qilayotgan musulmonlardan qo'rqish bilan ko'tarila boshladi. Millatchilik tashkiloti Bodu Bala Sena (BBS) tomonidan boshqariladi Galagoda Aththe Gnanasat.[74] Pyu tadqiqot markazining tadqiqotiga ko'ra musulmonlar soni ko'paymoqda va yaqin 20 yil ichida 35 foizga ko'payishi taxmin qilinmoqda.[4] Biroq, kelgusi o'n yil ichida mamlakatda buddaviylar soni bir oz ko'payishi taxmin qilinmoqda; ammo, 2050 yilga kelib, olimlar[JSSV? ] buddist aholi o'rtasida tug'ilish darajasining pasayishi tufayli aholi 5% gacha kamayishini taxmin qilish.[75]

2011 yil 10 sentyabrda buddist rohiblar Anuradhapuradagi 300 yillik musulmonlar ibodatxonasini vayron qilganlarida, musulmonlarga qarshi ta'qiblarning birinchi yirik misollaridan biri bo'lgan.[7] Hujum paytida politsiya xodimlari bo'lgan bo'lsa-da, hech kim aralashmadi.

2012 yil 20 aprelda taxminan 2000 buddist Dambulldagi masjid oldida norozilik namoyishi o'tkazdi, chunki bino Shri-Lanka buddistlari uchun muqaddas joyda joylashgan edi. Ushbu noroziliklar buddist millatchining tahdidlari sababli masjidning namozni bekor qilishiga sabab bo'ldi, ammo keyingi yakshanba kuni Bosh vazir D. M. Jayaratne masjidni muqaddas joydan ko'chirishga buyruq berdi.[74] O'shandan beri BBS Shri-Lankadagi musulmonlarni kamsitish usuli sifatida shiorlar va targ'ibotlardan foydalangan holda yangi ta'qib qilishni boshladi.

Shri-Lankadagi musulmonlar 250 dan ziyod odamning hayotiga zomin bo'lgan va 500 dan ortiq Shri-Lanka fuqarosining jarohat olgan islomiy terrorchilar tomonidan uyushtirilgan so'nggi 2019 yil aprel oyidagi Pasxa portlashlari bilan militsiya va buddist millatchilar har qachongidan ham ko'proq xavfga duch kelishdi.[76]

Mif-tarixiy ildizlar

Sinhalez buddizm milliy xronikasidagi mif-tarixiy ma'lumotlar Mahavamsa Milodiy VI asrda Shri-Lankada buddizmni ulug'lash uchun buddist rohiblar tomonidan yozilgan kanonik bo'lmagan matn ('Great Chronicle') Sinhal buddistik millatchiligi va jangari buddizm.[77][78][79][80][81][82][83][84][85] Mahavamsa buni ta'kidlaydi Lord Budda Shri-Lankaga uch marta tashrif buyurgan, u buddizmga qarshi bo'lgan kuchlar orolidan qutulgan va xudolarga sinhal ajdodlarini himoya qilishni buyurgan (Shahzoda Vijaya va Shimoliy Hindistondagi izdoshlari) Shri-Lankada buddizmning o'rnatilishi va gullab-yashnashiga imkon berish.[86][87] Ushbu afsona mamlakatni Sihadipa (Sinhalese oroli) va Dhamammadipa (buddizmni saqlab qolish va targ'ib qilish uchun jalb qilingan orol) ekanligi to'g'risida keng tarqalgan sinhal buddistlik e'tiqodiga olib keldi.[88] Boshqacha qilib aytganda, Sinhal buddist millatchilari o'zlarini Buddani deb tutishmoqda tanlangan odamlar va Shri-Lanka oroli buddistlar va'da qilgan erdir.[89][90] Mahavamsa, shuningdek, Buddist jangchi podshohining bayonini tasvirlaydi Dutugamunu, uning armiyasi va Tamil shohiga qarshi kurashayotgan va mag'lub bo'lgan 500 budda rohiblari Elara, kim kelgan Janubiy Hindiston va hokimiyatni egallab olgan Anuradhapura (o'sha paytdagi orolning poytaxti). Dutugamunu minglab odamlarni o'ldirganidan afsuslanganda, sakkiztasi arxatlar (Buddaning ma'rifatli shogirdlari) unga tasalli berish uchun kelgan, u hech qanday haqiqiy gunoh qilmaganligi uchun javob beradi, chunki u faqat hayvonlardan ustun bo'lmagan Tamil kofirlarini o'ldirgan, keyin davom eting: "siz dunyodagi ta'limotga shon-sharaf keltirasiz. Budda turli yo'llar bilan; shuning uchun qalbdan ehtiyot bo'ling, ey odamlarning hukmdori ".[91][92][93]

Dutugamununing qirol Elaraga qarshi olib borgan yurishi adolatsizlikni mag'lub etish emas edi, chunki Mahavamsa Elarani yaxshi hukmdor deb ta'riflagan, balki buddizmni monarxiya monarxiyasi ostida birlashgan Shri-Lanka orqali, hatto zo'ravonlik yordamida tiklash.[94] Buddaning Shri-Lankaga tashrifi haqidagi Mahavamsa hikoyasi (u "Fathchi" deb nomlanadi) buddizmga o'xshash bo'lmagan kuchlarni bo'ysundiradi, Yakkalar (orolning odam bo'lmagan aholisi sifatida tasvirlangan), "ularning qalbiga dahshat" urib, ularni o'z vatanidan haydab chiqarib, oxir-oqibat uning ta'limoti "shon-shuhratda porlashi" kerak, foydalanish uchun kafolat beruvchi deb ta'riflangan. buddizm uchun zo'ravonlik va muallifning buddizm ostida Shri-Lankaning siyosiy birligi hamkorlik qilmaydigan guruhlarni olib tashlashni talab qilishi haqidagi muallifning umumiy xabariga mos keladi.[95]

Neil DeVotta (Siyosatshunoslik dotsenti) ning so'zlariga ko'ra, Mahavamsa-da tasvirlangan mif-tarix "sinhal bo'lmaganlarni insonparvarlashtirishni oqlaydi, agar shunday qilish ularni saqlab qolish, himoya qilish va targ'ib qilish uchun zarur bo'lsa. dhamma (Buddaviylik ta'limoti). Bundan tashqari, bu qonuniylashtiriladi faqat urush doktrinasi, buddizmni himoya qilish uchun urush olib borilishi sharti bilan. Bilan birga Vijaya afsonasi, Lord Lord Buddha Shri-Lanka orolini ombor sifatida belgilagan degan Sinhalese Buddist e'tiqodining asoslarini taqdim etadi. Theravada buddizm. Sinhaliyaliklar orolda yashagan birinchi odamlar (xuddi sinhallardan avvalgi odamlar insoniy bo'lmagan) kabi va shu bilan haqiqiy "tuproq o'g'illari" bo'lgan deb da'vo qilishadi. Bundan tashqari, u orol podshohlari buddizmni himoya qilish va qo'llab-quvvatlash uchun ularga qarashgan degan e'tiqodni o'rnatadi. Ushbu meroslarning barchasi siyosiy buddizm va sinhal buddistik millatchiligi traektoriyasi uchun samara berdi ".[96]

Zamonaviy sinhal-buddist millatchilikning avj olishi

O'n to'qqizinchi asr oxiri va yigirmanchi asrning boshlarida zamonaviy sinhal buddistik millatchiligi paydo bo'lishi bilan yuzaga kelgan o'zgarishlarga munosabat sifatida Angliya mustamlakachiligi,[97] Mahavamsaning eski diniy mif-tarixi (ayniqsa Duthagamani va Elara singhal va tamil etallariga urg'u berilgan)[98]) qayta tiklandi va natijada orolda guruhlararo uyg'unlikka zarar etkazadi. Xezer Selma Gregg yozganidek: "Diniy tanlangan xalq va maxsus naslga oid mahalliy afsonalardan kelib chiqqan zamonaviy sinhal millatchiligi shuni ko'rsatadiki, hatto o'ziga xos tinchlik deb qabul qilingan din ham uning nomidan zo'ravonlik va nafratni kuchaytirishi mumkin."[99]

Xristian missionerlik ta'siriga qarshi sinhallar orasida buddistlar qayta tiklanishi sodir bo'ldi. Inglizlar buyurtma berishdi Sinxala Mahavamsaning tarjimasi (dastlab yozilgan) Pali ), shu bilan uni Sinhal aholisi uchun kengroq qilish.[100] Shu vaqt ichida zamonaviy Shri-Lanka tarixidagi birinchi g'alayon 1883 yilda buddistlar va katoliklar o'rtasida boshlanib, "ikki jamoa o'rtasidagi diniy tafovut kuchayib borayotganini" ta'kidlab o'tdi.[101]

Zamonaviy sinhal buddaviy millatchiligining shakllanishidagi markaziy shaxs buddist revivalist edi Anagarika Dharmapala (1864-1933), u "zamonaviy Sinhalese buddist millatchiligining otasi" deb ta'riflangan.[102] Dharmapala barcha sinhal va buddist bo'lmagan narsalarga qarshi edi. U sinhallarning irqiy jihatdan pok va ustun ekanliklarini ta'kidladi Oriylar esa Dravidian Tamillar pastroq edilar.[103][104] U tamillarni butparast bosqinchilar sifatida tasvirlaydigan Mahavamsa parchalarini keltirib, Tamil va Sinhaliyaliklar Shri-Lankada qariyb 2000 yil davomida halokatli dushmanlar bo'lganligi haqidagi taassurotni ommalashtirdi.[105] U tamillarni "buddizmga qarshi keskin antagonist" deb ta'riflagan.[106] Shuningdek, u orolnikiga nisbatan toqat qilmasligini bildirdi Musulmon ozchiliklar va umuman boshqa dinlar.[107] Dharmapala, shuningdek, "buddizmni va bizning millatchiligimizni unutishdan qutqargan" Shoh Duttagamani ruhida Sinhalese Buddist millatchiligini kuchaytirdi va Orol Sinhal Buddistlariga tegishli ekanligini aniq aytdi.[108] Dharmapala keyingi Sinhalese buddist millatchilariga asos yaratishda aybdor. etnosentrik davlat[109] va bunday davlatni qabul qilishni istamagan ozchiliklarga qarshi dushmanlik uchun.[110]

Siyosatlangan buddizm, etnokratiyaning shakllanishi va fuqarolar urushi

Istiqlolga erishgandan so'ng, Sinhaliyalik Buddist elita Buddistga asoslangan kamsituvchi siyosatni amalga oshirdi etno-millatchi Mahavamsa g'oyasi, orolda Sinhal Buddist hegemonligiga Budda tomonidan tanlangan odamlar sifatida imtiyoz beradi, chunki orol va'da qilingan er hisoblanadi va ozchiliklarni bo'ysundirishni oqlaydi.[111] Sinhaliyalik buddaviy amaldorlar tamil ta'sirining pasayishi buddistlarning madaniy qayta tiklanishini rivojlantirishning zaruriy qismi deb bildilar.[112] Dutthagamani afsonasi, shuningdek, ba'zi bir siyosatchilar bilan sinhal buddistlar hukmronligini o'rnatish uchun ishlatilgan, hatto bunday mif-tarixiy qahramon va faol rohiblar Duttagamaniga taqlid qilish uchun namuna sifatida qarashgan. Maxavamsaning ushbu asosiy qahramoni 20-asr Sinhalese Buddist millatchilari tomonidan Buddizmni himoya qilganligi va Shri-Lankani birlashtirgani tufayli jurnalistlar "Mahavamsa mentaliteti" haqida gapira boshlaganligi sababli keng namunali sifatida tanilgan.[113]

D. S. Senanayake 1947 yilda Shri-Lankaning birinchi bosh vaziri bo'lgan 1939 yilda Sinhalese buddistlari "bitta qon va bitta millat" deb e'lon qilish bilan 1939 yilda orol taqdiri uchun Sinhalese buddaistlarning javobgarligini umumiy Mahavamsa tomonidan qabul qilishni yana bir bor tasdiqladi. Biz tanlangan xalqmiz. Budda uning dinining 5500 ta bo'lishini aytdi [sic ] yil. Bu shuni anglatadiki, biz o'sha dinni saqlovchilar sifatida uzoq umr ko'rishimiz kerak. "[87] Buddistlar rohiblari ozchiliklar hisobiga mustaqillikdan keyingi siyosatga tobora ko'proq qo'shilib, sinhal buddistlik manfaatlarini ilgari surishdi. Walpola Rahula, Shri-Lankaning eng buyuk buddist rohiblari va sinhal buddistik millatchiligining etakchi tarafdorlaridan biri, buddistlar podshosi Duttagamani singan bilan munosabatlarini ishlatib, o'z mavqeini mustahkamlash uchun rohiblarning siyosatga aralashishini targ'ib qilishda katta rol o'ynagan. Rahula, shuningdek, a uchun bahslashdi faqat urush buddizmni tiklash uchun Duttagamani olib borgan urushlar misolidan foydalanib buddizmni himoya qilish to'g'risidagi ta'limot.[114] Rahula "butun Sinhal irqi yosh Gamini [Duttagamani] bayrog'i ostida birlashdi. Bu sinhalliklar orasida millatchilikning boshlanishi edi. Bu Buddizmning yangi tartibi ostida tashkil etilgan sog'lom qonli yangi poyga edi. A deyarli fanatizmga aylangan diniyizm, butun Sinhal xalqini qo'zg'atdi. Buddist bo'lmagan odam inson sifatida qabul qilinmadi. Shubhasiz barcha sinhalliklar buddistlar edi. "[115] Rahulaning asarlari haqida fikr yuritar ekan, antropolog X.L.Seneviratne "bu Rahulaga oddiy jamiyat bilan ijtimoiy munosabatni ulug'laydigan buddizm tarafdori bo'lishiga yaroqli ... ish haqi olish va boshqa moddiy to'lovlar; etnik eksklyuzivizm va buddistlik gegemonligi; siyosatdagi jangarilik; "dinni saqlab qolish" uchun zo'ravonlik, urush va qon to'kish.[116]

1956 yilda Butun Seylon Buddistlar Kongressi (ACBC) orolda buddizmning holatini so'rab, "Buddizmga xiyonat" deb nomlangan ma'ruza chiqardi. Hisobotda buddizm Mahavamsa va undan keyin eslatib o'tilgan tamil bosqinchilari kabi tashqi tahdidlar tufayli zaiflashgan deb ta'kidlandi. G'arb mustamlakachilari. Shuningdek, u davlatdan buddizmni tiklash va rivojlantirish va buddistlik maktablariga imtiyozli imtiyoz berishni talab qildi. Xuddi shu yili, S. W. R. D. Bandaranaike ACBC hisobotidan va uning saylov kampaniyasining asosi bo'lgan tavsiyalaridan foydalanib, uni "siyosatning keng doirasi rejasi" sifatida ishlatgan, bu erda davlatning yagona rasmiy tili sifatida Sinxala tilini joriy etish. Ko'p sonli buddist rohiblar va turli xil sinhal buddaviy tashkilotlari yordamida 1956 yilgi saylovlarda g'olib chiqqanidan keyin Bandaranaike bosh vazir bo'ldi. Bandaranaike Sinhalese Buddist millatchiligi asosida targ'ibot ishlarini olib borgan va Dharmapala va Mahavamsa yozuvlaridan ta'sir o'tkazgan, bu orolning taqdiri singal buddizm tabiatini saqlab qolish hukumatning vazifasi deb ta'kidlagan. Bir marta hokimiyatga kelganida, Bandaranaike 1956 yilni amalga oshirdi Faqat Sinxala akti Sinxalani mamlakatning rasmiy tiliga aylantiradigan va shu sababli barcha rasmiy davlat operatsiyalari Sinhalida amalga oshiriladigan edi. Bu Sinhal tilidan boshqa ma'ruzachilarni ish bilan ta'minlash va ta'lim olish uchun noqulay ahvolga solib qo'ydi. Natijada, Tamillar siyosatga qarshi o'tirishlarni uyushtirish orqali norozilik bildirdilar, bu esa o'z navbatida Buddist rohiblarning qarshi namoyishlarini keltirib chiqardi va keyinchalik buzilib ketdi. tamilga qarshi tartibsizliklar unda yuzdan ortiq odam yaralangan va tamil korxonalari talon-taroj qilingan. Keyin tartibsizliklar butun mamlakat bo'ylab tarqalib, yuzlab odamlarni o'ldirdi. Bandaranaike til siyosatidagi ziddiyatlarni yumshatishga harakat qilib, Tamil rahbarlari bilan murosaga kelishni taklif qildi, natijada 1957 yil pakt bu Tamil tilidan ma'muriy til sifatida Sinxala bilan bir qatorda Tamillarga katta siyosiy muxtoriyat sifatida foydalanishga imkon beradi. Buddist rohiblar va boshqa Sinhal millatchilari bu paktga qarshi ommaviy namoyishlar va ochlik e'lon qilish orqali qarshi chiqdilar.[117] O'sha yili bir tahririyatda bir rohib Bandaranaikedan Mahavamsa o'qishni va uning darslariga quloq solishni iltimos qildi: "[Duttagamani] qilich bilan zabt etildi va erni [Shri-Lanka] bizning dushmanlarimiz [ya'ni tamillar] o'rtasida bo'linmasdan birlashtirdi va davlat tili va din sifatida sinxala va buddizmni o'rnatdi ". 1950-yillarning oxirlarida siyosatchilar va rohiblar Duttagamanining Mahavamsa haqidagi rivoyatlaridan foydalanib, tamil ozchiliklarga bo'lgan har qanday imtiyozga qarshi chiqishlari odatiy holga aylandi.[118]

Buddist rohiblar paktni bekor qilish uchun bosim o'tkazishda katta rol o'ynaganligi sababli, Bandaranaike 1958 yil 9 aprelda "xursandchilik bilan qarsak chalayotgan monaxlar oldida pakt nusxasini" yirtib tashlash bilan ularning talablariga qo'shildi. Pakt bekor qilinganidan ko'p o'tmay, yana bir qator tamilga qarshi tartibsizliklar butun mamlakat bo'ylab tarqalib, yuzlab odamlarni o'ldirgan va minglab odamlarni uylarini tark etgan.[119] 1958 yilgi tartibsizliklar oldidan rohiblarning ritorikasi tamillarni mamlakat va buddizm dushmanlari sifatida qabul qilinishiga hissa qo'shgan. Buddist rohiblar ham, xudojo'ylar ham butun avtonomiya talabiga binoan Tamillarga qarshi kuch ishlatish uchun asosli asos yaratdilar, chunki butun Shri-Lanka Sinhalez buddistlarining va'da qilingan mamlakati va uni himoya qilish rohiblarning roli edi. birlashgan Shri-Lanka. Tamillar, shuningdek, sudxo'r Tamil qiroli Elaraning Mahavamsa haqidagi ma'lumotiga qaraganda, tahlikali interloperlar sifatida tasvirlangan. Rohiblar va siyosatchilar buddist jangchi podshosi Duttagamani haqida hikoya qilib, sinhallarni tamillarga va ularning orolga bo'lgan da'volariga qarshi kurashishga undashdi va shu bilan tamillarga qarshi zo'ravonlikni oqlashdi. Tessa J. Bartolomeusz tushuntirgandek: "tamillarning vatanga bo'lgan da'volari buddistlar hikoyasi bilan bog'langan mafkura bilan uchrashdi, bu urushni adolatli sabab bilan qonuniylashtirdi: Shri-Lankani sinhal-buddistlar uchun himoya qilish".[120] Tamillarni etnik ziddiyatlar ostida tinchlantirish uchun Bandaranaike Sinxala qonunini o'zgartirib, Tamilni Tamil hududlarida ta'lim va hukumatda ishlatishga ruxsat berdi va natijada Buddist rohib nomlangan Talduve Somarama 1959 yil 26 sentyabrda uni o'ldirgan. Rohib uni "o'z mamlakatiga, irqiga va diniga ko'proq foyda keltirish uchun" suiqasd qilganini da'vo qilgan.[121] Shuningdek, rohib Maxavamsani o'qib qisman rahbarlik qilgan degan taxminlar mavjud.[122]

Bandaranaikedan keyin ketma-ket hukumatlar ozchiliklar hisobiga xuddi shu singal buddist millatchilik dasturini amalga oshirdilar. 1972 yilda hukumat o'z konstitutsiyasini qayta yozdi va buddizmga "[Shri-Lanka Respublikasida] birinchi o'rinni" berdi va uni "buddizmni himoya qilish va rivojlantirish uchun davlatning vazifasi" qildi. 1965 yilda yana katta bitimni o'rnatishga intilgan yana bir bitim bilan mintaqaviy muxtoriyat chunki tamillar bekor qilindi (buddist ruhoniylarining ayrim vakillari bu paktga qarshi chiqishda birinchi o'rinda edilar) va 1974 yilda kamsituvchi kvota tizimi Tamillarga universitetlarga kirishni keskin cheklagan, Tamil yoshlari ga chaqirib, radikallashgan mustaqil vatan orolning tamillar hukmronlik qiladigan shimoli-sharqiy mintaqasida tashkil etilishi kerak. 1977 yilda, tamilga qarshi tartibsizliklar butun mamlakat bo'ylab tarqalib, yuzlab tamillarni o'ldirdi va minglab odamlarni uysiz qoldirdi.[123] Etakchi rohib 1977 yildagi tamillarga qarshi qo'zg'olonlarning sabablaridan biri bu Sinhalez Buddist epik qahramoni Duttagamani tamil iblisi bo'lganligi, bu esa haqli qasos olishga olib kelganini da'vo qildi.[124] Boshqa tamilga qarshi qo'zg'olon 1981 yilda otilib chiqqan Yaffna Sinhal politsiyasi va harbiy xizmatchilari Tamil madaniy va diniy arboblarining haykallarini vayron qilgan joyda; hindu ibodatxonasini va tamillarga tegishli do'konlarni va uylarni talon-taroj qildi; to'rtta tamilni o'ldirgan; va Yafna nomidagi ommaviy kutubxonani yoqib yubordi bu Tamillar uchun katta madaniy ahamiyatga ega edi.[112] Jangari bo'lginchi tamil guruhiga javoban LTTE eng katta 13 sinhal askarini o'ldirish tamilga qarshi pogrom 1983 yilda sodir bo'lgan va 2000 dan 3000 gacha tamillarni o'ldirishgan va 70,000 dan 100,000 gacha tamillarni qochqinlar lagerlariga majburlash va oxir oqibat mamlakatni Fuqarolar urushi LTTE va asosan Sinhal buddistlari o'rtasida Shri-Lanka hukumati.[125] 1983 yilgi Tamilga qarshi pogromda buddist rohiblar ba'zi hollarda tartibsizliklar boshchiligida. Kiril Metyu, katta vazir Prezident Jayavardene Vazirlar Mahkamasi va pogromdan oldingi yili Buddizm va Sinhales bilan mamlakatning buddaviy tabiati o'rtasidagi o'zaro munosabatlarni yana bir bor tasdiqlagan Sinhaliyalik Buddist millatchi ham pogrom uchun javobgardir.[126] Tamillarga qarshi pogromdan keyingi bir necha oy ichida Tamillarga qarshi zo'ravonlik uchun ruxsatnomalar matbuotda paydo bo'la boshladi, tamillar Dhamidipaga aralashganlar sifatida tasvirlangan. Duttagamani va Elaraning Mahavamsa haqidagi rivoyati ham Tamillarga qarshi zo'ravonlikni oqlash uchun chaqirilgan. Pogromdan so'ng, orolga bo'lgan huquqlar haqidagi munozaralarni "tuproq o'g'illari" mafkurasi mashhurlikka chaqirgan. Hukumat agenti Shri-Lankaning aniq taqdiri "Theravada buddizmning pok ta'limotini qo'llab-quvvatlash edi" deb e'lon qildi. Bu shuni anglatadiki, Sinhal buddistlari Shri-Lankaga nisbatan muqaddas da'voga ega edilar, tamillar esa bunday qilmadilar, bu zo'ravonlikka chaqirishi mumkin. Sinhalese buddistlar, shu jumladan Shri-Lanka hukumati, Tamilaning o'zlarining alohida vatani degan da'vosiga qarshi turdilar, chunki Sinhal Buddistlari butun mamlakat ularga tegishli ekanligini ta'kidladilar. Boshqa hukumat agenti o'sha paytdagi bosh vazir Jyewardenening paydo bo'lishiga to'sqinlik qilishga urinishlarini bog'ladi Tamil vatani Duttagamani Elara ustidan g'alaba qozondi va "mamlakat hech qachon bo'linishiga hech qachon yo'l qo'ymaydi" deb aytdi va shu bilan Tamillarga qarshi zo'ravonlikni oqladi.[127]

Separatizm uchun tamil jangarilarining kurashi kuchayib borayotgan bir paytda, jangari buddist rohiblar 1986 yilda Shri-Lankaning hududiy birligini saqlab qolish uchun "siyosiy partiyalar bilan ishlashga intilgan" Mavbima Surakime Vyaparaya (MSV) yoki "Vatanni himoya qilish harakati" ni tashkil etishdi. Orol ustidan sinhal buddist suvereniteti ". MSV o'z maqsadlarini oqlash uchun Mahavamsadan foydalangan, bunda tamil tahdidiga qarshi kurashish va Buddist davlatni himoya qilish uchun kuch ishlatilgan. 1987 yilda MSV bilan birga QK (rohiblarni o'z ichiga olgan jangari Sinhal millatchi guruhi) qurol olgan holda imzolanganiga qarshi chiqdi Hind-Shri-Lanka kelishuvi Shri-Lankada hukumatdan Tamil talablariga, shu jumladan, bir qator imtiyozlar berishni talab qilib, Shri-Lankada tinchlik o'rnatishga intildi. hokimiyatning Tamil provinsiyalariga o'tishi. QKP Sangha ko'magida zo'ravonlik kampaniyasini boshladi hukumatga qarshi qo'zg'olon Sinhal millatchilari Shri-Lanka suverenitetiga putur etkazadi deb hisoblaganidek, kelishuvga qarshi turish.[128]

1983 yilda fuqarolar urushi boshlanganidan to 2009 yil oxirigacha buddist rohiblar siyosat bilan shug'ullangan va qarshi chiqqan muzokaralar, sulh bitimlari yoki har qanday hokimiyatni topshirish Tamil ozchiliklariga va mojaroni harbiy yo'l bilan hal qilishni ko'pchilik qo'llab-quvvatladi.[129][130][131] This has led to Asanga Tilakaratne, head of the Department of Buddhist Philosophy in the Postgraduate Institute of Pali and Buddhist Studies in Colombo, to remark that "the Sinhala Buddhist nationalists are ... opposed to any attempt to solve the ethnic problem by peaceful means; and they call for a 'muqaddas urush ' against Tamils".[132] It has been argued that the absence of opportunities for quvvatni taqsimlash among the different ethnic groups in the island "has been one of the primary factors behind the intensification of the conflict".[133] Numerous Buddhist religious leaders and Buddhist organizations since the country's independence have played a role in mobilizing against the devolution of power to the Tamils. Leading Buddhist monks opposed devolution of power that would grant regional autonomy to Tamils on the basis of Mahavamsa worldview that the entire country is a Buddhist promised land which belongs to the Sinhalese Buddhist people, along with the fear that devolution would eventually lead to separate country.[134][135]

The two major contemporary political parties to advocate for Sinhalese Buddhist nationalism are The Janatha Vimukthi Peramuna (JVP) va Jathika Hela Urumaya (JHU) or "National Heritage Party", the latter of which is composed solely of Buddhist monks. According to A. R. M. Imtiyaz, these groups share common goals: "to uphold Buddhism and establish a link between the state and religion, and to advocate a violent solution to the Tamil question and oppose all form of devolution to the minorities, particularly the Tamils". The JHU, in shunning non-violent solutions to the ethnic conflict, urged young Sinhalese Buddhists to sign up for the army, with as many as 30,000 Sinhalese young men doing just that.[136] One JHU leader even declared that NNTlar and certain government servants were traitors and they should be set on fire and burnt due to their opposition to a military solution to the civil war.[137] The international community encouraged a federal tuzilish for Sri Lanka as a peaceful solution to the civil war but any form of Tamil self-determination, even the more limited measure of autonomy, was strongly opposed by hard-line Sinhalese Buddhist nationalist groups such as the JVP and JHU, who pushed for the military solution.[138][139] These groups in their hard-line support for a military solution to the conflict, without any regard for the plight of innocent Tamil civilians,[140] have opposed negotiated settlement, ceasefire agreement, demanded that the Norwegians be removed as peace facilitators, demanded the war to be prosecuted more forcefully and exerted influence in the Rajapaksa hukumati (which they helped to elect), resulting in the brutal military defeat of the LTTE with heavy civilian casualties.[141] The nationalist monks' support of the government's military offense against the LTTE gave "religious legitimacy to the state's claim of protecting the island for the Sinhalese Buddhist majority."[142] Prezident Rajapaksa, in his war against the LTTE, has been compared to the Buddhist king Dutthagamani by the Sinhalese Buddhist nationalists.[143]

Violence against religious minorities

Other minority groups have also come under attack by Sinhalese Buddhist nationalists. Fear of country's Buddhist hegemony being challenged by Christian proselytism has driven Buddhist monks and organizations to demonize Christian organizations, with one popular monk comparing missionary activity to terrorism; as a result, Sinhalese Buddhist nationalists, including the JVP and JHU, who oppose attempts to convert Buddhists to another religion, support or conduct nasroniylarga qarshi zo'ravonlik. The number of attacks against Christian churches rose from 14 in 2000 to over 100 in 2003. Dozens of these acts were confirmed by U.S. diplomatic observers.[144] This anti-Christian violence was led by extremist Buddhist clergy and has included acts of "beatings, arson, acts of sacrilege, death threats, violent disruption of worship, stoning, abuse, unlawful restraint, and even interference with funerals". It has been noted that the strongest anti-West sentiments accompany the anti-Christian violence since the Sinhalese Buddhist nationalists identify Christianity with G'arb which they think is conspiring to undermine Buddhism.[145][146]

In the postwar Sri Lanka, ethnic and religious minorities continue to face threat from Sinhalese Buddhist nationalism.[147][148][149] There have been continued sporadic attacks on Christian churches by Buddhist extremists who allege that Christians conduct unethical or forced conversion.[150] The Pew tadqiqot markazi has listed Sri Lanka among the countries with very high religious hostilities in 2012 due to the violence committed by Buddhist monks against Musulmon va Nasroniy ibodat joylari.[151] These acts included attacking a mosque and forcefully taking over a Seventh-day advent church and converting it into a Buddhist temple.

Extremist Buddhist leaders justify their attacks on the places of worship of minorities by arguing that Sri Lanka is the promised land of the Sinhalese Buddhists to safeguard Buddhism.[152][153] The recently formed Buddhist extremist group, the Bodu Bala Sena (BBS), or Buddhist Power Force, founded by Buddhist monks in 2012, has been accused of inciting the musulmonlarga qarshi tartibsizliklar that killed 4 Muslims and injured 80 in 2014.[154] The leader of the BBS, in linking the government's military victory over the LTTE to the ancient Buddhist king conquest of Tamil king Elara, said that Tamils have been taught a lesson twice and warned other minorities of the same fate if they tried to challenge Sinhalese Buddhist culture.[142] The BBS has been compared to the Toliblar, accused of spreading extremism and communal hatred against Muslims[155] and has been described as an "ethno-religious fascist movement".[156] Buddhist monks have also protested against BMTning Inson huquqlari bo'yicha kengashi resolution that called for an inquiry into humanitarian abuses and possible war crimes fuqarolar urushi paytida.[157] The BBS has received criticism and opposition from other Buddhist clergy and politicians. Mangala Samaraweera, Shri-Lanka Theravada buddisti bo'lib xizmat qilgan siyosatchi Tashqi ishlar vaziri since 2015, has accused the BBS of being "a representation of ‘Taliban’ terrorism’" and of spreading extremism and communal hatred against Muslims.[158][159] Samaraweera has also alleged that the BBS is secretly funded by the Mudofaa vazirligi.[158][159] Anunayake Bellanwila Wimalaratana, deputy incumbent of Bellanwila Rajamaha Viharaya and President of the Bellanwila Community Development Foundation, has stated that "The views of the Bodu Bala Sena are not the views of the entire Sangha community" and that "We don’t use our fists to solve problems, we use our brains".[160] Wataraka Vijitha Thero, a Buddhist monk who condemns violence against Muslims and heavily criticized the BBS and the government, has been attacked and tortured for his stances.[161][162][163]

Buddhist opposition to Sinhala Buddhist nationalism

Sinhala Buddhist Nationalism is opposed to Sarvodaya, although they share many of the same influences like Dharmapala 's teachings for example, by having a focus upon Sinhalese culture and ethnicity sanctioning the use of violence in defence of dhamma, while Sarvodaya has emphasized the application of Buddhist values in order to transform society and campaigning for peace.[164]

These Buddhist nationalists have been opposed by the Sarvodaya Shramadana harakati, a o'z-o'zini boshqarish movement led by the Buddhist Dr. A. T. Ariyaratne and based in Buddhist ideals, who condemn the use of violence and the denial of inson huquqlari to Tamils and other non-Buddhists.[165] Ariyaratne calls for non-violent action and he has been actively working for peace in Sri Lanka for many decades, and has stated that the only way to peace is through "the dispelling of the view of 'I and mine' or the shedding of 'self' and the realization of the true doctrines of the interconnection between all animal species and the unity of all humanity,"[166] buddistlik nuqtai nazaridan ijtimoiy harakatlarni targ'ib qilish. He stated in one of his lectures, "When we work towards the welfare of all the means we use have to be based on Truth, Non-violence and Selflessness in conformity with Awakening of All".[167] Ariyaratne tarafdorlari boshqalarga xizmat qilishda o'zini yo'qotib qo'yish va boshqalarni uyg'otishga undash. Ariyaratne has stated, "I cannot awaken myself unless I help awaken others".[167]

Sharqiy Osiyo

Yaponiya

Shuningdek qarang: Yaponiyada buddizm
Kasumigaseki stantsiyasi yilda Yaponiya, one of the many stations affected during the attack by the Aum Shinrikyo kult

The beginning of "Buddhist violence" in Japan relates to a long history of feuds among Buddhists. The shehe or "warrior monks" appeared during the Heian davri, although the seeming contradiction in being a Buddhist "warrior monk" caused controversy even at the time.[168] More directly linked is that the Ikkō-shū movement was considered an inspiration to Buddhists in the Ikkō-ikki isyon. In Osaka they defended their temple with the slogan "The mercy of Buddha should be recompensed even by pounding flesh to pieces. One's obligation to the Teacher should be recompensed even by smashing bones to bits!"[169]

Davomida Ikkinchi jahon urushi, Japanese Buddhist literature from that time, as part of its support of the Japanese war effort, stated "In order to establish eternal peace in East Asia, arousing the great benevolence and compassion of Buddhism, we are sometimes accepting and sometimes forceful. We now have no choice but to exercise the benevolent forcefulness of 'killing one in order that many may live' (issatsu tashō). This is something which Mahayana Buddhism approves of only with the greatest of seriousness..."[170] Deyarli barchasi Japanese Buddhists temples strongly supported Japan's militarization.[171][172][173][174][175][176] These were heavily criticized by the Xitoy buddistlari of the era, who disputed the validity of the statements made by those Japanese Buddhist supporters of the war. In response the Japanese Pan-Buddhist Society (Myowa Kai) rejected the criticism and stated that "We now have no choice but to exercise the benevolent forcefulness of 'killing one in order that many may live' (issatsu tashō)" and that the war was absolutely necessary to implement the dharma Osiyoda. The society re-examined more than 70 texts written by Nichiren and re-edited his writings, making changes in 208 places, cutting all the statements that disagreed with the state Shinto.[177][178] In contrast, a few Japanese Buddhists such as Ichikawa Haku[179] va Seno’o Girō opposed this and were targeted. During the 1940s, "leaders of the Honmon Hokkeshu and Soka Kyoiku Gakkai were imprisoned for their defiance of wartime government religious policy, which mandated display of reverence for the state Shinto".[180][181][182]Brayan Deyzen Viktoriya, a Buddhist priest in the Sōtō Zen sect, documented in his book Urushdagi Zen how Buddhist institutions justified Yaponiya militarizmi in official publications and cooperated with the Yapon imperatori armiyasi ichida Rus-yapon urushi va Ikkinchi jahon urushi. In response to the book, several sects issued an apology for their wartime support of the government.[183][184]

In more modern times instances of Buddhist-inspired terrorism or militarism have occurred in Japan, such as the assassinations of the Qonli hodisalar ligasi boshchiligidagi Nissho Inoue, a Nichirenist or fascist-nationalist who preached a self-styled Nichiren buddizmi.[183][185][186]

Aum Shinrikyo, Yaponiyaning yangi dini va qiyomatga sig'inish that was the cause of the Tokio metrosidagi zarin hujumi that killed thirteen people and injured more than a thousand, drew upon a sinkretik view of idiosyncratic interpretations of elements of early Indian Buddhism, Tibet buddizmi va Hinduizm, qabul qilish Shiva as the main image of worship, Christian ming yillik dan fikrlar Vahiy kitobi, Yoga va yozuvlari Nostradamus.[187][188] Uning asoschisi, Chizuo Matsumoto, claimed that he sought to restore "original Buddhism"[189] and declared himself "Masih ",[190] Japan's only fully enlightened master and identified with the "Xudoning Qo'zisi ".[191] His purported mission was to take upon himself the gunohlar of the world, and he claimed he could transfer to his followers spiritual power and ultimately take away their sins and bad deeds.[192] While many discount Aum Shinrikyo's Buddhist characteristics and affiliation to Buddhism, scholars often refer to it as an offshoot of Japanese Buddhism,[193] va harakat odatda o'zini qanday aniqladi va ko'rdi.[194]

Shuningdek qarang

Adabiyotlar

  1. ^ Baroni 2002 yil, 3-bet.
  2. ^ a b Barbaro 2010, 120-121-betlar.
  3. ^ Jerryson & Juergensmeyer 2010, 22-bet.
  4. ^ a b "Global musulmon aholining kelajagi". Pyu tadqiqot markazining din va jamoat hayoti loyihasi. 2011-01-27. Olingan 2019-10-13.
  5. ^ Beech, Hannah (2019-07-08). "Buddhists Go to Battle: When Nationalism Overrides Pacifism". The New York Times. ISSN  0362-4331. Olingan 2020-08-07.
  6. ^ Bodhi, Bxikxu (1995). The Middle Length Discourses of the Buddha: A New Translation of the Majjhima Nikāya, Wisdom Publications. p. 223
  7. ^ a b Haviland, Charles (2011-09-15). "S Lanka monks raze Muslim shrine". Olingan 2019-10-13.
  8. ^ Buswell va Lopez 2013 yil, pp. 589.
  9. ^ a b v d Xarris 1994 yil.
  10. ^ Kalupaxana 1992 yil, 105-106 betlar.
  11. ^ Brannigan 2010, 59-bet.
  12. ^ a b Bhikkhu 1996.
  13. ^ a b Bhikkhu 2005.
  14. ^ a b Bhikkhu 2008.
  15. ^ a b "Madhyama Agama, Taisho Tripitaka. 1-jild, № 26, sutra 31 (g分別聖n h諦ng h經nhng)". Kbeta. Arxivlandi asl nusxasi 2008 yil 22-noyabrda. Olingan 28 oktyabr 2008.
  16. ^ a b "Taisho Tripitaka 1-jild, № 32, 814-bet".. Kbeta. Arxivlandi asl nusxasi 2008 yil 22-noyabrda. Olingan 27 oktyabr 2008.
  17. ^ a b Kleyton 2006 yil, 75-bet.
  18. ^ a b Markham & Lohr 2009, 95-bet.
  19. ^ a b Bodhi 2010, pp. 48-58.
  20. ^ Bhikkhu 1997.
  21. ^ Tripāṭhī 2008, pp. 137.
  22. ^ Gnanananda Thero & Jayasinghe 2002, 57-bet.
  23. ^ a b Neusner, Chilton & Tully 2013, 181-bet.
  24. ^ Chitkara 1999, 166-bet.
  25. ^ Thera 1994.
  26. ^ Fausböll 1881, 29-bet.
  27. ^ Reat 1994, 40-bet.
  28. ^ "Sutta Nipata 705". berkleycenter.georgetown.edu. Jorjtaun universiteti. Arxivlandi asl nusxasi 2015 yil 15-iyunda. Olingan 13 iyun 2015.
  29. ^ Gampopa & Gyaltsen Rinpoche 1998, 143-bet.
  30. ^ Sumedho 2014, 249-250-betlar.
  31. ^ Zaun 2002, 9-bet.
  32. ^ Knaster 2010 yil, 64-bet.
  33. ^ Thera 2006, 129-bet.
  34. ^ Mishra 2010 yil, 291-bet.
  35. ^ "Buddhist Ethics". buddhanet. Olingan 6 dekabr, 2013.
  36. ^ Gowans 2004, 176-bet.
  37. ^ Michael Jerryson Qabul qilingan 4 iyul 2017 yil.
  38. ^ Shadbolt 2013.
  39. ^ Jerryson 2011, 110-bet.
  40. ^ Jerryson 2011, 182-186 betlar.
  41. ^ Skidmore 2005 yil, 120-bet.
  42. ^ Roberts & Garton Ash 2011, pp. 354-370.
  43. ^ "UN envoy warns of Myanmar crisis". www.aljazeera.com.
  44. ^ Elaine Pearson (6 August 2008). "Burma: No Rights Reform 20 Years After Massacre | Human Rights Watch". Hrw.org. Olingan 13 oktyabr 2009.
  45. ^ Fuller, Thomas (20 June 2013). "Extremism Rises Among Myanmar Buddhists". The New York Times.
  46. ^ "OPINION: Myanmar's Buddhist terrorism problem".
  47. ^ Siddiqui, Habib (21 October 2012). "Letter from America: Buddhist Terrorism – no longer a myth". Osiyo tribunasi. Olingan 31 mart 2013.
  48. ^ Fuller, Thomas (5 November 2012). "Charity Says Threats Foil Medical Aid in Myanmar". The New York Times. Olingan 1 aprel 2012.
  49. ^ "Buddhists terrorists block aid to Burma Muslims". IRIB Jahon xizmati. 7 Noyabr 2012. Arxivlangan asl nusxasi 2015 yil 11 yanvarda. Olingan 1 aprel 2013.
  50. ^ "Terrorist Organization Profile:Democratic Karen Buddhist Army (DKBA)". The Study of Terrorism and Responses to Terrorism, the University of Maryland. 2013. Arxivlangan asl nusxasi 2013 yil 27-iyulda. Olingan 1 aprel 2013.
  51. ^ a b "Attacks approach Myanmar's biggest cities". Gulf News. 2013 yil 30 mart. Olingan 31 mart 2013.
  52. ^ "Of A Sustained Buddhist Extremism In Sri Lanka". Colombo Telegraph. 2012 yil 11 oktyabr. Olingan 31 mart 2012.
  53. ^ Hodal, Kate (2013-04-18). "Buddhist monk uses racism and rumours to spread hatred in Burma". Himoyachi. London. Olingan 2013-05-30.
  54. ^ "Myanmar govt targets 'neo-Nazi' Buddhist group". Bo'g'ozlar vaqti. 2013-04-08. Arxivlandi asl nusxasi 2013-04-14. Olingan 2013-05-30.
  55. ^ Szep, Jason (8 April 2013). "Special Report - Buddhist monks incite Muslim killings in Myanmar". Reuters. Meiktila. Olingan 23 iyun 2015.
  56. ^ "Myanmar's '969' crusade breeds anti-Muslim malice". GlobalPost. 2013 yil 27 mart. Olingan 26 iyun 2013.
  57. ^ Hannah Beech (1 July 2013). "The Face of Buddhist Terror". Time jurnali.
  58. ^ "All you can do is pray". Human Rights Watch tashkiloti. 2013-04-22. Olingan 2013-05-30.
  59. ^ "Massacre in Central Burma: Muslim Students Terrorized and Killed in Meiktila". Global tadqiqotlar. 2013-05-26. Olingan 2013-05-30.
  60. ^ "Fresh communal riots in Myanmar". Bangkok Post. 2013-03-25. Arxivlandi asl nusxasi 2016-03-03 da. Olingan 2013-05-30.
  61. ^ "Buddhist mobs spread fear among Myanmar's Muslims". Yahoo yangiliklari. 2013-05-30. Olingan 2013-05-30.
  62. ^ "Is 'nationalism' solely to blame for Burma's latest anti-Muslim violence?". Osiyo muxbiri. 2013-05-30. Olingan 2013-05-30.
  63. ^ "How to reverse Buddhism's radical turn in Southeast Asia?". IRIN. 2013 yil 16-iyul. Olingan 24 iyun 2017.
  64. ^ Thích Nhất Hạnh; Bxikxu Bodhi; A. T. Ariyaratne; Chao Khun Raja Sumedhajahn; Phra Paisal Visalo; 8-Arjia Rinpoche; Shodo Xarada; Judit Simmer-Braun; Ajaxn Amaro; Alan Senauke; Chan Xon; Jek Kornfild; Surya Das; Zoketsu Norman Fischer; Tulku Sherdor Rinpoche; 14th Dalai Lama (10 December 2012). "Buddhist Leaders Respond To Violence Against Muslims In Myanmar". huffingtonpost.com. Huffington Post. Olingan 19 iyun 2015.
  65. ^ Lila, Muhammad (22 April 2013). "International Dalai Lama Pleads for Myanmar Monks to End Violence Amid Damning Rights Report". ABC News. Dharamshala. Olingan 19 iyun 2015.
  66. ^ Anuradha Sharma Pujari; Vishal Arora (2014 yil 1-may). "Nirvanaless: Osiyo buddizmining tobora kuchayib borayotgan fundamentalistik yo'nalishi". washingtonpost.com. Washington Post. Olingan 19 iyun 2015.
  67. ^ Jon S. Kuchli (1989). Shoh Akokaning afsonasi: Aokovadanani o'rganish va tarjimasi. Motilal Banarsidass Publ. 232–233 betlar. ISBN  978-81-208-0616-0. Olingan 30 oktyabr 2012.
  68. ^ a b Stiven L. Danver, tahrir. (2010 yil 22-dekabr). Jahon tarixidagi mashhur qarama-qarshiliklar: tarixning qiziq savollarini o'rganish: tarixning qiziq savollarini o'rganish.. ABC-CLIO. p. 99. ISBN  978-1-59884-078-0. Olingan 23 may 2013.
  69. ^ a b Le Phuoc (2010 yil mart). Buddist me'morchiligi. Grafikol. p. 32. ISBN  978-0-9844043-0-8. Olingan 23 may 2013.
  70. ^ Benimadhab Barua (2010 yil 5-may). Ajivikalar. Kalkutta universiteti. 68-69 betlar. ISBN  978-1-152-74433-2. Olingan 30 oktyabr 2012.
  71. ^ The Buddha Image: Its Origin and Development, Yuvraj Krishan, Kalpana K. Tadikonda, Bharatiya Vidya Bhavan, 1996 p. 28
  72. ^ Sri Lanka's Killing Fields (Documentary) | Haqiqiy hikoyalar, olingan 2019-10-13
  73. ^ Beech, Hannah (2019-05-05). "'A New Enemy but the Same Hate': Can Sri Lanka Heal Its Divisions?". The New York Times. ISSN  0362-4331. Olingan 2019-10-13.
  74. ^ a b Imtiyaz, A.R.M.; Mohamed-Saleem, Amjad (2015-02-23). "Muslims in post-war Sri Lanka: understanding Sinhala-Buddhist mobilization against them". Osiyo millati. 16 (2): 186–202. doi:10.1080/14631369.2015.1003691. ISSN  1463-1369. S2CID  143023786.
  75. ^ "Year 2050: 10 Countries Predicted to Have the Highest Buddhist Populations in the World". WorldAtlas. Olingan 2019-10-13.
  76. ^ "Sri Lanka: Muslims Face Threats, Attacks". Human Rights Watch tashkiloti. Olingan 2019-11-02.
  77. ^ Gregg, Heather Selma (2014-01-01). The Path to Salvation: Religious Violence from the Crusades to Jihad. Potomac Books, Inc. p. 75. ISBN  9781612346601. the Mahavamsa is a combination of myth, history, lineage, religion, and politics. It later became a tool for the creation of Sinhalese Buddhist nationalism and a document that determined the divine right of the Sinhalese to inhabit the island.
  78. ^ Zwier, Lawrence J. (1998-01-01). Sri Lanka: War-torn Island. Lerner nashrlari. ISBN  9780822535508. The greatest importance of the Mahavamsa is not as history but as a symbol — and as a motivating force behind Sinhalese nationalism.
  79. ^ Grant, Patrik (2009-01-05). Shri-Lankadagi buddizm va etnik ziddiyat. SUNY Press. p. 51. ISBN  9780791493670. As Heinz Bechert says, the key to modern Sinhala national identity lies in the linking of religion and the people in Sri Lanka's ancient chronicle tradition. As we see, according to the Mahavamsa, Sinhalas are specially chosen by the Buddha and their political unity guarantees the survival of Buddhism in Sri Lanka, just as their political identity is guaranteed by their espousal of Buddhism.
  80. ^ DeVotta 2007, p. 50.
  81. ^ Razak, Abdul; Imtiyaz, Mohamed (2010-03-09). "Politicization of Buddhism and Electoral Politics in Sri Lanka". Rochester, NY: Ijtimoiy fanlarni o'rganish tarmog'i: 36. SSRN  1567618. The Sinhala-Buddhist worldview has been shaped and reshaped by the myths and the monkish chronicles such as the Mahavamsa, Culavamsa which underscore two crucial issues, the rightful heir of the state (Dhammadipa) and Sri Lanka as the repository of Buddhist message. Both these two issues have shaped the popular psyche and political discourses. Iqtibos jurnali talab qiladi | jurnal = (Yordam bering)
  82. ^ Gier, Nicholas F. (2014-08-20). Diniy zo'ravonlikning kelib chiqishi: Osiyo nuqtai nazari. Leksington kitoblari. p. 47. ISBN  9780739192238. Buddhist nationalism has its roots in the Dipavamsa, Mahavamsa, and Culavamsa, texts unique to Sinhalese Buddhism.
  83. ^ O'Greydi, Jon; May, John D'Arcy; Schüttke-Scherle, Peter (2007-01-01). Ecumenics from the Rim: Explorations in Honour of John D'Arcy May. LIT Verlag Münster. p. 371. ISBN  9783825806378. The ethnocentric character of Theravada Buddhism in Sri Lanka, which provides the ideological basis for the present Sinhala Buddhist nationalism, has its roots in the construction of the identity of the Sinhala people as one chosen to safeguard Buddhism. Chosenness here is part of a historical consciousness, mainly supported by post-canonical Pali literature - especially, the Mahavamsa - which, in one of its clauses, justifies killing for the sake of religion.
  84. ^ McGowan, William (2 August 2012). "Buddhists Behaving Badly". Tashqi ishlar. Olingan 2016-02-20. Militant Buddhism there has its roots in an ancient narrative called the Mahavamsa (Great Chronicle), which was composed by monks in the sixth century.
  85. ^ Sailendra Nath Sen (1999). Qadimgi Hindiston tarixi va tsivilizatsiyasi. New Age International. p. 91. ISBN  978-81-224-1198-0.
  86. ^ Deegalle 2006 yil, p. 138.
  87. ^ a b Bartholomeusz 2005, p. 142.
  88. ^ DeVotta 2007, p. 6.
  89. ^ Bartholomeusz 2005, p. 20.
  90. ^ McGowan, William (2 August 2012). "Buddhists Behaving Badly". Tashqi ishlar. Olingan 2016-02-20. The Sinhalese take this as a sign that they are the Buddha's chosen people, commanded to "preserve and protect" Buddhism in its most pristine form.
  91. ^ DeVotta 2007, 7-8 betlar.
  92. ^ Deegalle 2006 yil, p. 153.
  93. ^ "Chapter XXV THE VICTORY OF DUTTHAGAMANI". lakdiva.org. Olingan 2016-02-20. `From this deed arises no hindrance in thy way to heaven. Only one and a half human beings have been slain here by thee, O lord of men. The one had come unto the (three) refuges, the other had taken on himself the five precepts Unbelievers and men of evil life were the rest, not more to be esteemed than beasts. But as for thee, thou wilt bring glory to the doctrine of the Buddha in manifold ways; therefore cast away care from thy heart, O ruler of men!
  94. ^ Grant, Patrik (2009-01-05). Shri-Lankadagi buddizm va etnik ziddiyat. SUNY Press. 48-51 betlar. ISBN  9780791493670. The campaign against Elara is described at some length in the Mahavamsa, and it is clear that Dutthagamini does not move against Elara because the Tamil king was unjust, cruel, or tyrannical. The Mahavamsa points out that Elara was a good ruler, and, when he is killed, Dutthagamini has him cremated honorably, and erects a monument in his memory. In constructing the "Dutthagamini epic" as he does, Mahanama wants to make clear that the heroic task in hand is not the defeat of injustice but the restoration of Buddhism. The overthrow of the Tamil king is required first and foremost because Sri Lanka cannot be united unless the monarch is Buddhist. [...] The main point is the honor Dutthagamini brings "to the doctrine of the Buddha," and this greater good justifies the violence required to bring it about. [...] Mahanama's [author of the Mahavamsa] lesson for monarchs remains consistent: be as strong as you need to be to maintain the Buddhist state; be supportive of the Sangha and willing to defeat the enemy by force.
  95. ^ Bartholomeusz 2005, p. 50.
  96. ^ DeVotta 2007, p. 8.
  97. ^ Gregg, Heather Selma (2014-01-01). The Path to Salvation: Religious Violence from the Crusades to Jihad. Potomac Books, Inc. p. 75. ISBN  9781612346618.
  98. ^ DeVotta 2007, p. 7.
  99. ^ Gregg, Heather Selma (2014-01-01). The Path to Salvation: Religious Violence from the Crusades to Jihad. Potomac Books, Inc. p. 74. ISBN  9781612346618.
  100. ^ Zwier, Lawrence J. (1998-01-01). Sri Lanka: War-torn Island. Lerner nashrlari. ISBN  9780822535508. Because the Mahavamsa was written in Pali, few Sinhalese could read it until its translation. It was the British who made the Mahavamsa a widely distributed work, publishing an English translation of the first part of the Mahavamsa in 1837. The British governor also commissioned the Sinhalese translation of the original and its updates.
  101. ^ DeVotta 2007, p. 40.
  102. ^ DeVotta 2007, p. 14.
  103. ^ "Sri Lankan Tamil Struggle". Association of Tamils of Sri Lanka in the USA. Sangam. Olingan 7 aprel 2017.
  104. ^ Jayavardena, Kumari. "Racial myths debunked". Orol. Olingan 7 aprel 2017.
  105. ^ Zwier, Lawrence J. (1998-01-01). Sri Lanka: War-torn Island. Lerner nashrlari. ISBN  9780822535508. Perhaps more than any other person, Dharmapala was responsible for popularizing the faulty impression that Tamils and Sinhalese had been deadly enemies in Sri Lanka for nearly 2,000 years. He often quoted the Mahavamsa as if it were a completely factual account, and his favorite passages were those that made the Tamils sound like pagan invaders who were ruining the island. Much of his preaching and writing was racist. Dharmapala insisted that the Sinhalese were racially pure Aryans — by which he meant that they had racial ties with north Indians, Iranians, and Europeans. He contrasted the Sinhalese racial line with that of the Dravidian Tamils, which he claimed was inferior.
  106. ^ Grant, Patrik (2009-01-05). Shri-Lankadagi buddizm va etnik ziddiyat. SUNY Press. p. 74. ISBN  9780791493670.
  107. ^ Grant, Patrik (2009-01-05). Shri-Lankadagi buddizm va etnik ziddiyat. SUNY Press. 70-73 betlar. ISBN  9780791493670. Dharmapala holds firm to the conviction that "the founders of monotheistic religions have been invariably bloodthirsty, despotic, and cruel" (418), and he is unremitting in his condemnation of the religious views of Jews, Christians, and Muslims. [...] "The Muhammedans," we learn, are "an alien people" who "by Shylockian methods became prosperous like the Jews" (540), and, like the colonizers, Muslims thrive at the expense of "the Sinhalese, sons of the soil" (540). Muslims are "alien to the Sinhalese by religion, race and language," and, consequently, "there will always be bad blood" (541) between the two groups.
  108. ^ Deegalle 2006 yil, 91-92-betlar.
  109. ^ DeVotta 2007, p. 16.
  110. ^ Grant, Patrik (2009-01-05). Shri-Lankadagi buddizm va etnik ziddiyat. SUNY Press. p. 77. ISBN  9780791493670. One result of Dharmapala's commitment to this all-too clear agenda is that he prepares the way for indignation and anger to be directed against any non-Sinhala group unwilling to accept a Sinhala Buddhist Sri Lanka. After independence, the Tamils were first in line among such groups, and the national hero, Dutthagamini, had already provided an example of how to deal with an earlier version of the same threat.
  111. ^ DeVotta 2007, pp. viii, 11.
  112. ^ a b Knut, Rebekka. "Destroying a Symbol: Checkered History of Sri Lanka's Jaffna Public Library" (PDF). Xalqaro kutubxona assotsiatsiyalari va muassasalari federatsiyasi (IFLA). Olingan 20 fevral 2016.
  113. ^ Grant, Patrik (2009-01-05). Shri-Lankadagi buddizm va etnik ziddiyat. SUNY Press. p. 49. ISBN  9780791493670.
  114. ^ Bartholomeusz 2005, 78-79-betlar.
  115. ^ DeVotta 2007, p. 22.
  116. ^ Deegalle 2006 yil, p. 213.
  117. ^ Gregg, Heather Selma (2014-01-01). The Path to Salvation: Religious Violence from the Crusades to Jihad. Potomak kitoblari, Inc. pp. 81–83. ISBN  9781612346618.
  118. ^ Bartholomeusz 2005, 12-13 betlar.
  119. ^ Ganguly & Brown 2003, 127-128-betlar.
  120. ^ Bartholomeusz 2005, pp. 82-94.
  121. ^ Gregg, Heather Selma (2014-01-01). The Path to Salvation: Religious Violence from the Crusades to Jihad. Potomac Books, Inc. p. 84. ISBN  9781612346618.
  122. ^ Bartholomeusz 2005, 13-14 betlar.
  123. ^ Gregg, Heather Selma (2014-01-01). The Path to Salvation: Religious Violence from the Crusades to Jihad. Potomac Books, Inc. pp. 84–86. ISBN  9781612346618.
  124. ^ Bartholomeusz 2005, p. 94.
  125. ^ Gregg, Heather Selma (2014-01-01). The Path to Salvation: Religious Violence from the Crusades to Jihad. Potomac Books, Inc. pp. 86–87. ISBN  9781612346618.
  126. ^ DeVotta 2007, pp. 19, 30–31.
  127. ^ Bartholomeusz 2005, 87-96-betlar.
  128. ^ Gregg, Heather Selma (2014-01-01). The Path to Salvation: Religious Violence from the Crusades to Jihad. Potomac Books, Inc. pp. 87–88. ISBN  9781612346618.
  129. ^ Deegalle 2006 yil, p. 205.
  130. ^ Bartholomeusz 2005, p. 32.
  131. ^ Marty, Martin E. (1996-07-01). Fundamentalizm va davlat: siyosatni qayta tiklash, iqtisodiyot va jangarilik. Chikago universiteti matbuoti. p. 614. ISBN  9780226508849. the majority of monks explicitly or privately supported and condoned the Sinhalese army's killings of Tamil guerrillas.
  132. ^ Bartholomeusz 2005, p. 160.
  133. ^ Deegalle 2006 yil, p. 186.
  134. ^ Bartholomeusz 2005, 33-34 betlar.
  135. ^ Chatterji, Manas; Jain, B. M. (2008-10-13). Janubiy Osiyoda ziddiyat va tinchlik. Emerald Group nashriyoti. p. 126. ISBN  9781849505345. Many Sinhalese, as Mahavamsa advocates, believe that the entire island is the sacred home of the Sinhalese and Buddhism and thus oppose power-sharing with the Tamils that fundamentally goes beyond the current form of unitary structure.
  136. ^ Razak, Abdul; Imtiyaz, Mohamed (2010-03-09). "Politicization of Buddhism and Electoral Politics in Sri Lanka". Rochester, NY: Social Science Research Network: 9–10. SSRN  1567618. Iqtibos jurnali talab qiladi | jurnal = (Yordam bering)
  137. ^ DeVotta 2007, p. 33.
  138. ^ DeVotta 2007, p. 35.
  139. ^ Ridge, Mian. "Sri Lanka's Buddhist monks are intent on war". Telegraph.co.uk. Olingan 2016-02-20. The monks have used their new power to argue vociferously against any self-determination for the Tamils in the north, opposing even the more limited measure of autonomy that most observers believe is necessary for peace. Instead they are pushing for the bloody military campaign against the Tigers to be stepped up.
  140. ^ DeVotta 2007, p. 28; "The JVP and JHU ardently support a military solution to the conflict and harbor almost no concern for the plight of innocent Tamil civilians."
  141. ^ Razak, Abdul; Imtiyaz, Mohamed (2010-03-09). "Politicization of Buddhism and Electoral Politics in Sri Lanka". Rochester, NY: Social Science Research Network: 33. SSRN  1567618. Human right groups expressed deep concerns about the use of heavy weapons against the Tamil civilians. Human Right Watch in its report on Sri Lanka's war against the LTTE pointed that "the Sri Lankan armed forces have indiscriminately shelled densely populated areas, including hospitals, in violation of the laws of war."119 Evidence gathered by the Times newspaper has revealed that at least 20,000 Tamil people were killed on the Mullaitivu beach by Sri Lanka Army shelling. Iqtibos jurnali talab qiladi | jurnal = (Yordam bering)
  142. ^ a b Mohan, Rohini (2015-01-02). "Sri Lanka's Violent Buddhists". The New York Times. ISSN  0362-4331. Olingan 2016-02-20.
  143. ^ DeVotta 2007, p. 9; "For instance, the military successes against the LTTE under the current Rajapakse government have led to Rajapakse being compared to Duthagamani. Toward the end of 2006, a massive cardboard cut-out of Rajapakse was even erected at the junction at Maradana, Kolombo, proclaiming, "Our President, Our Leader; He is Next to King Dutugemenu."
  144. ^ "Shri-Lanka". AQSh Davlat departamenti. Olingan 2018-10-13.
  145. ^ DeVotta 2007, 41-45 betlar.
  146. ^ "Shri-Lanka". AQSh Davlat departamenti. Olingan 2016-02-20. In late 2003 and in the initial months of this year, there were many serious attacks on Christian churches and also sometimes against pastors and congregants. Over 100 attacks have been reported, and several dozen were confirmed by diplomatic observers.
  147. ^ "2012 yilgi xalqaro diniy erkinlik to'g'risidagi hisobot". www.state.gov. Olingan 2016-02-20. There were reports of abuses of religious freedom. Although the government publicly endorsed religious freedom, in practice there were problems in some areas. Authorities were reluctant to investigate or prosecute those responsible for attacks on churches, Hindu temples, or mosques. While efforts to pass anti-conversion legislation reportedly declined, some Christian groups occasionally complained that the government tacitly condoned harassment and violence aimed at them. Police generally provided protection for these groups at their request. In some cases, the police response was inadequate and local police officials reportedly were reluctant to take legal action against individuals involved in the attacks.
  148. ^ "International Religious Freedom Report for 2013". www.state.gov. Olingan 2016-02-20. There were reports of societal abuses and discrimination based on religious affiliation, belief, or practice. There was an overall decrease in societal respect for religious freedom, as Buddhist nationalist groups led campaigns targeting Muslims and Christians. Buddhist groups attacked churches and mosques.
  149. ^ "International Religious Freedom Report for 2014". www.state.gov. Olingan 2016-02-20. Authorities often did not investigate or prosecute those responsible for attacks on churches, Hindu kovils (temples), and mosques, and protected perpetrators of such violence. Ba'zida mahalliy politsiya va hukumat amaldorlari buddist millatchi tashkilotlar bilan hamjihatlikda harakat qilishgan. Police continued to use a revoked 2011 government circular to coerce unregistered churches to register or be shut down. Eight masked men assaulted the pastor of New Blessing Church in Valaichchenai and his family when they reportedly failed to comply with the "government requirement" to submit a registration letter. In April President Rajapaksa acknowledged for the first time the increase in religiously-motivated violence and established a special religious police unit within the Ministry of Buddha Sasana (doctrine and practice) and Religious Affairs to address complaints. Some religious minorities, however, questioned the sincerity and efficacy of the effort, and the unit took no credible steps during the year to pursue prosecution of perpetrators of violence.
  150. ^ "Shri-Lanka". AQSh Davlat departamenti. Olingan 2016-02-20.
  151. ^ "Religious Hostilities Reach Six-Year High". Pyu tadqiqot markazining din va jamoat hayoti loyihasi. 2014 yil 14-yanvar. Olingan 14 oktyabr, 2019. In Buddhist-majority Sri Lanka, for example, monks attacked Muslim and Christian places of worship, including reportedly attacking a mosque in the town of Dambulla in April 2012 and forcibly occupying a Seventh-day Adventist church in the town of Deniyaya and converting it into a Buddhist temple in August 2012.
  152. ^ Haviland, Charles (September 15, 2011). "Sri Lanka Buddhist monks destroy Muslim shrine". BBC. Olingan 12 oktyabr, 2019. The monk who led the group told the BBC he did it because the shrine was on land that was given to Sinhalese Buddhists 2,000 years ago.
  153. ^ "Sri Lanka Muslims decry radical Buddhist mosque attack - BBC News". BBC yangiliklari. Olingan 2016-02-20. A Dambulla monk told the BBC that the actions were necessary because Sri Lanka was "the only country to safeguard Buddhism".
  154. ^ "Bodu Bala Sena, Sri Lanka's Buddhist ultra-nationalists - CNN.com". CNN. Olingan 2016-02-20. The ultra-nationalist Sinhalese Buddhist organization has emerged as a troubling presence on the Sri Lankan political landscape in recent years, and is blamed by many for inciting the deadly violence in Aluthgama.
  155. ^ "BBSO challenges Mangala equating it to a terrorist outfit | The Sundaytimes Sri Lanka". www.sundaytimes.lk. Olingan 2016-02-20.
  156. ^ "The hardline Buddhists targeting Sri Lanka's Muslims - BBC News". BBC yangiliklari. Olingan 2016-02-20.
  157. ^ McGowan, William (2 August 2012). "Buddhists Behaving Badly". Tashqi ishlar. Olingan 2016-02-20. Another sign of militant Buddhism's enduring power is the government's refusal to confront the human rights abuses committed in the war's final push. President Rajapaksa, who went to Kandy, the cultural capital, immediately after the 2009 victory to genuflect to the country's top Buddhist clerics, has rejected a UN Human Rights Council resolution, passed in March, that called for an inquiry into humanitarian abuses and possible war crimes. Only recently did the Rajapaksa government concede that there were any civilian casualties at all. In fact, as the UNHRC voted on the March resolution, hundreds of Buddhist monks led a prayer vigil in Colombo against it. Hundreds more led protests when it passed.
  158. ^ a b Bandara, Hansani (17 February 2013). "BBSO challenges Mangala equating it to a terrorist outfit". Sunday Times (Shri-Lanka).
  159. ^ a b Bastians, Dharisha (15 February 2013). "Mangala says anti-Muslim campaign is 'playing with fire'". Daily FT. Arxivlandi asl nusxasi 2015 yil 8 dekabrda. Olingan 18 oktyabr 2015.
  160. ^ "BBS does not represent entire Sangha". Daily FT. 12 Mart 2013. Arxivlangan asl nusxasi 2015 yil 24 sentyabrda. Olingan 18 oktyabr 2015.
  161. ^ Mohan, Rohini (3 January 2015). "Sri Lanka's Violent Buddhists". The New York Times. Bangalor. Olingan 14 oktyabr 2019.
  162. ^ "Shri-Lanka: Musulmonlarga qarshi zo'ravonlikni to'xtatish uchun adolat kaliti". Human Rights Watch tashkiloti. 19 iyun 2014 yil. Olingan 18 oktyabr 2015.
  163. ^ "Shri-Lankada mo''tadil rohib musulmonlarga qarshi zo'ravonlikni tanqid qilmoqda". BBC. 19 iyun 2014 yil. Olingan 18 oktyabr 2015.
  164. ^ Pauers, Jon (2009). Marani abadiy yo'q qilish: Damien Keown sharafiga buddist axloqiy insholar. Snow Lion nashrlari. p. 144. ISBN  9781559397889. Olingan 17 iyun 2015.
  165. ^ Tomas Banchoff; Robert Vutnov (2011). Din va inson huquqlarining global siyosati. Oksford: Oksford universiteti matbuoti. p. 178. ISBN  9780199841035. Olingan 17 iyun 2015.
  166. ^ Bond, Jorj. "Buddaviylik ishda: jamiyatni rivojlantirish, ijtimoiy imkoniyatlarni kengaytirish va Sarvodaya harakati". (Kumarian P, 2003) 42
  167. ^ a b Bond, Jorj. "Buddaviylik ishda: jamiyatni rivojlantirish, ijtimoiy imkoniyatlarni kengaytirish va Sarvodaya harakati". (Kumarian P, 2003)
  168. ^ D.Gort, Jerald; Jensen, Genri; H. M. Vroom, Xendrik (2005). Yomonlik va yaxshi chuqurliklarni tekshirish: ko'p dinli qarashlar va amaliy tadqiqotlar. p. 165. ISBN  9042022310.CS1 maint: mualliflar parametridan foydalanadi (havola)
  169. ^ Yaponiya tarixidagi din Jozef M. Kitagava tomonidan, 116-117-betlar
  170. ^ "Kuch ishlatishga buddaviy qarashlar". isme.tamu.edu.
  171. ^ Gier, Nikolas, F. Buddizm va yapon millatchiligi: sheriklikning achinarli xronikasi
  172. ^ Viktoriya, Brayan Deyzen (2006), Zen urushda (Ikkinchi tahrir), Lanham e.a .: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Inc.
  173. ^ Viktoriya, Brayan Deyzen (2010), "D. T. Suzukining urushga aloqadorligining" salbiy tomoni " (PDF), Sharqiy buddist 41/2: 97-138*
  174. ^ Tosh, Jakuelin (2000). Yapon Lotus Mingyilligi. In: Vessinger, Ketrin, Ming yillik, ta'qib va ​​zo'ravonlik, Sirakuz universiteti matbuoti, p.265
  175. ^ Otani Eiichi, "Sharqiy Osiyodagi Nichiren buddizmining missionerlik faoliyati", unda: "Zamonaviy yapon buddizmi va Pan-Osiyoizm", Dinlar tarixi bo'yicha xalqaro uyushmaning 19-Butunjahon Kongressi, Tokio, 2005 yil 28 mart, 21-bet. –22 PDF
  176. ^ Kavase Takaya, "Jodo Shinshu mazhabining mustamlakachilik Koreyasida missionerlik faoliyati"; In: "Zamonaviy Yapon buddizmi va Pan-Osiyoizm", Xalqaro dinlar tarixi assotsiatsiyasining 19-Butunjahon Kongressi, Tokio, 2005 yil 28 mart, 6-7-betlar. PDF
  177. ^ Xue Yu (2013 yil 14 oktyabr). Buddizm, urush va millatchilik: Xitoy rohiblari 1931-1945 yillarda Yaponiya tajovuziga qarshi kurashda. Yo'nalish. p. 208. ISBN  978-1-135-48732-4.
  178. ^ Brayan Viktoriya. Urushdagi Zen, 2006. 87-bet
  179. ^ Ives, Kristofer (2009). Imperial-Way Zen, Hawaiì universiteti matbuoti
  180. ^ Stone, Jaqueline I. (2003). In: Buswell, Robert E. ed. Buddizm ensiklopediyasi, Nyu-York: Makmillan ma'lumotnomasi Lib. ISBN  0028657187, p. 598
  181. ^ Nanzan universiteti, Yaponiya diniy tadqiqotlar jurnali, jild. 13, № 1, 40-bet, 1986 yil mart, http://nirc.nanzan-u.ac.jp/nfile/2324
  182. ^ Din va Amerika madaniyati, Entsiklopediya, 1-bet. 61 ISBN  157607238X
  183. ^ a b Naoko Shimazu (2006 yil avgust). Yaponiyadagi millatchiliklar (Sheffild yapon tadqiqotlari markazi / Routledge). Yo'nalish. p. 89. ISBN  978-0415546843. Olingan 14 may 2015.CS1 maint: mualliflar parametridan foydalanadi (havola)
  184. ^ Urushdagi Zen (2-nashr) Brayan Deyzen Viktoriya, Rovman va Littlefild 2006, ISBN  0-7425-3926-1
  185. ^ Pennington, Brayan K. (2012). Din va zo'ravonlikni o'rgatish. OUP AQSh. p. 89. ISBN  9780195372427.
  186. ^ Iy ま き よ よ う （Makiyo Hori, "「 ぎ の 折伏 ": 血盟 団 事件 事件 に い て」 」（" Inoue Nissho va uning terroristik g'oyalari: qon guruhi qasamyodiga oid ba'zi eslatmalar "） 早 稲 （経Vaseda Siyosatshunoslik va Iqtisodiyot jurnali） 328 b.178 (1996)
  187. ^ Jekson, Brayan Entoni; Jon C. Beyker (2005). Yo'q qilish uchun qobiliyat: beshta terroristik guruhda tashkiliy ta'limni o'rganish. RAND korporatsiyasi. p. 11. ISBN  978-0-8330-3767-1.
  188. ^ Yan Reader (2000). Zamonaviy Yaponiyada diniy zo'ravonlik: Aum Shinrikoning ishi. Gavayi universiteti matbuoti. pp.66–68. ISBN  978-0824823405.
  189. ^ Richard Danzig, Mark Sageman, Terrance Leyton, Lloyd Xou, Xidemi Yuki, Rui Kotani va Zakari M. Xosford (2000). Aum Sinrikyo terrorchilar biologik va kimyoviy qurollarni qanday ishlab chiqarayotgani to'g'risida tushuncha (PDF). Yangi Amerika xavfsizligi markazi. p. 10. Arxivlangan asl nusxasi (PDF) 2016-03-16. Olingan 2013-04-12.CS1 maint: mualliflar parametridan foydalanadi (havola)
  190. ^ Snow, Robert L. (2003). O'lik kultlar: Haqiqiy imonlilarning jinoyati. Greenwood Publishing Group. p.17. ISBN  978-0-275-98052-8.
  191. ^ Keklik, Kristofer Xyu (2006). G'arbni qayta sehrlash: muqobil ma'naviyat, sakralizatsiya, ommaviy madaniyat va madaniyat. Continuum International Publishing Group. p. 300. ISBN  978-0-567-04133-3.
  192. ^ Griffit, Li (2004). Terrorizmga qarshi kurash va Xudoning dahshati. Uilyam B. Eerdmans nashriyot kompaniyasi. p. 164. ISBN  978-0-8028-2860-6.
  193. ^ Xudo yodidagi terror: diniy zo'ravonlikning global ko'tarilishi Mark Juergensmeyer tomonidan, Kaliforniya universiteti matbuoti 2003 yil, 103-bet ISBN  0-520-24011-1
  194. ^ Zaharli kokteyl: Aum Shinrikyoning zo'ravonlik yo'li Ian Reader tomonidan, NIAS nashrlari 1996, 16-bet ISBN  87-87062-55-0

Manbalar